Upload
steve-richards
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
1/22
HAVS
Chris Pugh
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
2/22
HAND ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME
Common condition
Serious
Preventable
Partly understood
Potentially disabling
Primarily affects men during their economically activeyears
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
3/22
HAVS is a general term embracing various kinds ofdamage including
Vascular
Characteristically episodic blanching of fingers due to
arterial/arteriolar spasm, with subsequent reactive
hyperaemia (painful)
usually precipitated by cold
occurs more frequently in winter
lasts 1 minute 1 hour (approx)
normal finger colour between attacks
normal blood flow returns spontaneously or on
deliberate re-warming
symptoms such as finger pain, numbness, coldness,
loss of dexterity and co-ordination may occur during
attacks
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
4/22
Sensorineural
Not precipitated by temperature changes and tend to be
constant. May include:
tingling (persistently and not just on exposure)
numbness
loss of manual dexterity
reduced sensitivity to touch/temperature
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
5/22
Musculoskeletal
muscle fatigue and reduction in grip strength
Possible periarticular ossification and osteoarthritis
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
6/22
Whats the Size of the Problem?
In the UK 5 million exposed to HAV
2 million at risk of developing HAVS
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
7/22
What is the prognosis?
Vascular symptoms:
become more severe with continuing exposure
may improve with a reduction or cessation of exposure
any improvement may take several years
age of subject, severity of disease at cessation of exposure and
duration of exposure after onset of symptoms influence prospects ofimprovement
Neurological symptoms:
Limited evidence of improvement after cessation of exposure;appears to occur at even slower rate than improvement in vascular
symptoms
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
8/22
Is there any treatment?
No generally recognised effective treatment, but some
evidence that treatment with Ca+-channel antagonists
may result in both symptomatic and objective improve-ment, even with continuing exposure
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
9/22
Who is at risk?
At risk individuals are those who regularly and frequently use:
hand held power tools
hand guided powered machinery
hand fed machinery
e.g. chainsaws, rock drills, scabblers, grinders, sanders, concretebreakers, riveting hammers, needle guns, rock drills, chippinghammers, road breakers, ballast tampers, linishers, pedestalgrinders, strimmers etc., etc.
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
10/22
Does exposure vary?
Yes it can vary enormously between workers
in a single worker from day to day
even where the same tool is in use for the same task
Variables include: tool type, how its being used and its condition
the strength of grip used
Impulsive tools tend to give higher exposures than rotary
action tools. Environmental conditions
Note: manufacturers exposure data may notreflect field exposure.
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
11/22
Vibration at Work Regulations
To implement Physical Agents (Vibration)Directive
To control exposure to HAV and wholebody vibration
Due to become law in July 2005
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
12/22
Transitional Period
Relates to limit values
Allows them to be exceeded until 2010 forequipment in use by 2007 BUT ONLY WHERE
LATEST TECHNICAL/ORGANISATIONALDEVELOPMENTS DO NOT ALLOW LIMITS TOBE COMPLIED WITH
Limits do apply to new equipment after 2007
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
13/22
Requirements
Eliminate risk or if not reasonablypracticable reduce to a minimum
Carry out risk assessment and review itregularly
Assess exposure levels
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
14/22
Exposure Values
These are triaxial sums and assume an 8hour working day
Exposure action value (EAV) 2.5 m/s2
A(8)
Exposure limit value (ELV) 5.0 m/s2 A(8)
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
15/22
If EAV exceeded
Carry out program of organisational andtechnical measures to reduce exposure toa minimum
Appropriate to activity
Consistent with risk assessment
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
16/22
What measures?
Alternative ways of working whicheliminate need to hold vibrating equipment
Appropriate tool for task, least possiblevibration
Ensuring tool accessories suitable and ingood condition
Minimise time on tool e.g. by job rotation
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
17/22
What if ELV exceeded
It shouldnt be!!
If it is immediate measures need to betaken to reduce it below the ELV
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
18/22
Other duties
Provide information and training
Carry out health surveillance onindividuals exposed at or above EAV
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
19/22
HSE Enforcement?
Possible areas
Enforcement of ELV
Emphasis on control of risk to much
measurement to little control
Health Surveillance
?lower below EAV
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
20/22
How is it caused?
Vascular
Either disorder of sympathetic nervous system leading to
vasospasm, orLocal damage to blood vessels, resulting in tendency
to episodic vasospasm
Sensorineural
HAVS is known to be associated with a loss of dermal nerve fibres.In very severe cases gross damage to peripheral trunks may be
found
Musculoskeletal
Unclear whether reported reductions in muscle strength result from
muscular or neurological damage. Osteoarthritis and periarticular
ossification at the elbow are said to occur in users of tools which
generate percussive vibration
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
21/22
Stockholm grading (vascular)
Vascular component
0 No attacks
1V Mild Occasional attacks affecting onlythe tips of one or more fingers
2V Moderate Occasional attacks affectingdistal and middle (rarely alsoproximal phalanges of one ormore fingers
3V Severe Frequent attacks affecting all
phalanges of most fingers
4V Verysevere
As in stage 3, with trophicchanges in the fingertips
7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION
22/22
Sensorineural component
Stage Description
OSN Vibration-exposed but no symptoms
ISN Intermittent numbness with or without
tingling
2SN Intermittent or persistent numbness,reduced sensory
3SN Intermittent or persistent numbness,
Reduced tactile discrimination