HAVSPRESENTATION

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    1/22

    HAVS

    Chris Pugh

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    2/22

    HAND ARM VIBRATION SYNDROME

    Common condition

    Serious

    Preventable

    Partly understood

    Potentially disabling

    Primarily affects men during their economically activeyears

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    3/22

    HAVS is a general term embracing various kinds ofdamage including

    Vascular

    Characteristically episodic blanching of fingers due to

    arterial/arteriolar spasm, with subsequent reactive

    hyperaemia (painful)

    usually precipitated by cold

    occurs more frequently in winter

    lasts 1 minute 1 hour (approx)

    normal finger colour between attacks

    normal blood flow returns spontaneously or on

    deliberate re-warming

    symptoms such as finger pain, numbness, coldness,

    loss of dexterity and co-ordination may occur during

    attacks

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    4/22

    Sensorineural

    Not precipitated by temperature changes and tend to be

    constant. May include:

    tingling (persistently and not just on exposure)

    numbness

    loss of manual dexterity

    reduced sensitivity to touch/temperature

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    5/22

    Musculoskeletal

    muscle fatigue and reduction in grip strength

    Possible periarticular ossification and osteoarthritis

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    6/22

    Whats the Size of the Problem?

    In the UK 5 million exposed to HAV

    2 million at risk of developing HAVS

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    7/22

    What is the prognosis?

    Vascular symptoms:

    become more severe with continuing exposure

    may improve with a reduction or cessation of exposure

    any improvement may take several years

    age of subject, severity of disease at cessation of exposure and

    duration of exposure after onset of symptoms influence prospects ofimprovement

    Neurological symptoms:

    Limited evidence of improvement after cessation of exposure;appears to occur at even slower rate than improvement in vascular

    symptoms

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    8/22

    Is there any treatment?

    No generally recognised effective treatment, but some

    evidence that treatment with Ca+-channel antagonists

    may result in both symptomatic and objective improve-ment, even with continuing exposure

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    9/22

    Who is at risk?

    At risk individuals are those who regularly and frequently use:

    hand held power tools

    hand guided powered machinery

    hand fed machinery

    e.g. chainsaws, rock drills, scabblers, grinders, sanders, concretebreakers, riveting hammers, needle guns, rock drills, chippinghammers, road breakers, ballast tampers, linishers, pedestalgrinders, strimmers etc., etc.

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    10/22

    Does exposure vary?

    Yes it can vary enormously between workers

    in a single worker from day to day

    even where the same tool is in use for the same task

    Variables include: tool type, how its being used and its condition

    the strength of grip used

    Impulsive tools tend to give higher exposures than rotary

    action tools. Environmental conditions

    Note: manufacturers exposure data may notreflect field exposure.

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    11/22

    Vibration at Work Regulations

    To implement Physical Agents (Vibration)Directive

    To control exposure to HAV and wholebody vibration

    Due to become law in July 2005

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    12/22

    Transitional Period

    Relates to limit values

    Allows them to be exceeded until 2010 forequipment in use by 2007 BUT ONLY WHERE

    LATEST TECHNICAL/ORGANISATIONALDEVELOPMENTS DO NOT ALLOW LIMITS TOBE COMPLIED WITH

    Limits do apply to new equipment after 2007

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    13/22

    Requirements

    Eliminate risk or if not reasonablypracticable reduce to a minimum

    Carry out risk assessment and review itregularly

    Assess exposure levels

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    14/22

    Exposure Values

    These are triaxial sums and assume an 8hour working day

    Exposure action value (EAV) 2.5 m/s2

    A(8)

    Exposure limit value (ELV) 5.0 m/s2 A(8)

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    15/22

    If EAV exceeded

    Carry out program of organisational andtechnical measures to reduce exposure toa minimum

    Appropriate to activity

    Consistent with risk assessment

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    16/22

    What measures?

    Alternative ways of working whicheliminate need to hold vibrating equipment

    Appropriate tool for task, least possiblevibration

    Ensuring tool accessories suitable and ingood condition

    Minimise time on tool e.g. by job rotation

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    17/22

    What if ELV exceeded

    It shouldnt be!!

    If it is immediate measures need to betaken to reduce it below the ELV

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    18/22

    Other duties

    Provide information and training

    Carry out health surveillance onindividuals exposed at or above EAV

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    19/22

    HSE Enforcement?

    Possible areas

    Enforcement of ELV

    Emphasis on control of risk to much

    measurement to little control

    Health Surveillance

    ?lower below EAV

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    20/22

    How is it caused?

    Vascular

    Either disorder of sympathetic nervous system leading to

    vasospasm, orLocal damage to blood vessels, resulting in tendency

    to episodic vasospasm

    Sensorineural

    HAVS is known to be associated with a loss of dermal nerve fibres.In very severe cases gross damage to peripheral trunks may be

    found

    Musculoskeletal

    Unclear whether reported reductions in muscle strength result from

    muscular or neurological damage. Osteoarthritis and periarticular

    ossification at the elbow are said to occur in users of tools which

    generate percussive vibration

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    21/22

    Stockholm grading (vascular)

    Vascular component

    0 No attacks

    1V Mild Occasional attacks affecting onlythe tips of one or more fingers

    2V Moderate Occasional attacks affectingdistal and middle (rarely alsoproximal phalanges of one ormore fingers

    3V Severe Frequent attacks affecting all

    phalanges of most fingers

    4V Verysevere

    As in stage 3, with trophicchanges in the fingertips

  • 7/31/2019 HAVSPRESENTATION

    22/22

    Sensorineural component

    Stage Description

    OSN Vibration-exposed but no symptoms

    ISN Intermittent numbness with or without

    tingling

    2SN Intermittent or persistent numbness,reduced sensory

    3SN Intermittent or persistent numbness,

    Reduced tactile discrimination