Harvard's Physics department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity on You Tube

8/14/2019 Harvard's Physics department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity on You Tube

1/116

ewton's - Kepler's Ultimatum to Alfred Nobel Prize winner Physicists Stup

here are no physicists after us only "University" Idiots like Space time Relativistic Quantum and Strings mechanics is not physics

Real time Universal MechanicsNewton's - Kepler's equations solved wrong for 350 years1001 new real time physics formulas

Changing physics and the History of physicsAnnexing quantum strings and all other mechanics to classical mechanics and deleting relativit

It is the math formulas that matches a physics experiment resultsNewton's - Kepler's equations solved wrong for 350 years

Real time Newton's - Kepler's mechanicsProfessor Joe Nahhas July 4th 1973

[email protected]

ad my Lips: Joe Nahhas will end Alfred Nobel Mafia of Physics and physicists stupThere is one and only one Mechanics

Real time universal mechanicsReal time mechanics is the natural law of past present and future of mechanic

For 400 years Newton's - Kepler's were formulated and solved wrong.The new real time solution of Newton's Kepler's equations deletes modern physics whichis

based on relativistic quantum string time travel mechanicsand matches experimentswith unprecedented accuracy to change physics and the history of physics in its entirety.Modern Physics is based on relativistic quantum string time travel mechanics. Time iscaveman and modern man scale of convenience and is not Alfred Nobel dimension for tim

travel regardless of what all Alfred Nobel time travel "Physicists" have to say about it. Timtravel is not physics and accepting time travel as physics in classrooms and using it inscientific calculations by Physicists changed physics to stupidity and scientists to at leastpalm readers and stupidity can only lead to more stupidity and more stupidity in fraud.This is the proof of 110 years of Alfred Nobel Prize winner Physicists stupidity and fraud. not saying that Alfred Nobel physics is stupid or fraud; I can prove it stupid and fraud anthis document is Modern Physics death certificate


2/116

For 350 years Newton and all others miss formulated 400 years old Kepler'smechanics observations and Laws wrong and gave equations that have been solvedwrong for 350 years and introduced Alternative physics based proofs made forlooting money because after over a century of time traveling physics and physiciststhe only proof of time travel is that physicists have no proof of time travel and the

collective value of Modern Physics is the value of 110 years of Nobel prize winnerphysics of stupidity because Modern Physics is stupidity itself. The correct and newformulation and solution of Newton's - Kepler's equations exposed 400 years ofwrong physics and physicists and exposed 110 years of Nobel prize winner modernrelativistic quantum and strings mechanics as stupidity itself. The new solutions ofNewton's - Kepler's equations erases 400 years of physics and re-write physics andthe history of physics in its entirety; annexes quantum mechanics to classicalNewton's - Kepler's equations mechanics and deletes relativity theory in its entirety.The name is Joe Nahhas and I am handing Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists theirphysics back.

Real time Universal Mechanics annexing all mechanics to classical mechanics anddeleting relativity.All there is in the universe is objects of mass m at a location r = r (x, y, z) = (length,width, height). The state of any object in the Universe isS = m r (x, y, z)State = mass x location; this is real time mechanical law of the UniverseWhat is wrong in all of physics is taking time dependent measurements wron

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.We can only see and measure something that had happened. What wemeasure in not what happened. We measure in present time an eventthat happened in past time. That is we measure past events in presenttimePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delaysReal time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays

physicsWhat one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event +relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real timerelativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delays


3/116

Quantum = classical + relativity

Quantum - classical = relativity

Real time classical - classical = classical time delaysOne and only one mechanics

Stupidity is Modern physics and stupid is modern physicists. I can say thatbecause I can prove that and it is not just one stupid physicist but 400,000 strongstupid physicists and for all past 400 long years and 1001 "Universities" andresearch centers and it is not just one proof but it is a full line of 1001 iron cladproofs of Modern physicists stupidity and at the top is 110 years of Alfred NobelPrize winner physicists Space - to imaginary time - back to space jumpingcontinuum stupidity. Any thing that does not fit in three dimensional space (x, y, z)= (length, width, height) is not physics and Space - to time - back to space fourdimensional jumping continuum (x, y, z, t) = (length, width, height, imaginarytime) or ten dimensional string theories is not physics and building physics on space- to time - back to space Imaginary jumping continuum is stupidity itself because itis not real and it odes not exist and without a proof and it is not related to anythingthat can describe nature because Nature have not shown that it is made out a morethan three dimensions and this road physicists chosen is not only the wrong roadbut it had led to the downfall of physics from science to stupidity and all modernphysics roads has one end and is a dead end and a dead end is the stupidity ofspace- to imaginary time - back to space Alfred Nobel prize winner physics of

stupidity . I can prove that space - to imaginary time - back to space is stupidityitself and I can prove that Modern physics space - t0 Imaginary time - back to spaceJumping continuum is not physics and the sign of a moron halo above physicistshead and the logo of Physicists stupidity. The purpose of this book is not justpresent new ideas but to bring down the house with new ideas and the new idea isbringing back physics and send Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics back to senderwith Kepler's regards Newton's signature and my two middle fingers!

Did you know that all of humanity is yet to learn how to use a telescope or a microscope or any equipmentthat uses a signal to take a correct time dependent measurement in all of sciences?

Let me give an example of the 400,000 Physicists of space - to imaginary time - back to spacejumping stupidity and how time dependent measurement were taken wrong and led to modern"University" professors stupidity and how the 400 years old mistake were used for the firstexperimental proof of space-time relativistic quantum mechanics stupidity of physics andphysicists, or, Albert Einstein's - space-time - quantum relativistic stupidity physics that is taughtin classrooms and used in scientific calculations as the basis of Modern physics of stupidity.


4/116

Physicists and Astrophysicists and all others are yet to learnhow to use a telescope

If you drive a bicycle in a circle then your angular speed is:

The angular speed is ' = orbital velocity/ radius = v/rPhysicists and Astrophysicists measure the motion of planets around the Sun or they measureorbital speed v and they measure the average radial distance r to measure the angular speed.They can not measure planets motion angular speed around the Sun directly.In day time there is Sun and they can not see planetsAt night time there is no Sun and they can see the planetsSo, astronomers measure planets motion around the moving sun through an imaginaryAstronomical sphere attached to moving Earth and fixed stars and Earth- Sun motion isknown then they transfer the planets motion around the Sun data to the Sun from the datacollected on Earth and everything would be relative to the sun and we can know the datarelative to the Sun like in this table from Earth data transfer to the sun.

The angular speed is ' = v/rFor Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/secIf you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", thenAnd W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per centuryIf it is measured for planet Mercury thenW" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88)W"= 70.29 arc second per century

Astronomers and physicists in 1859 found that there are more of 43 arc sec per century.How did that happen?

Time travel!

Or 150,000 living stupid idiots physicists with PhD's and Nobel Prizes spending their life timesbullying about time travel and "Crown Jewels" of quantum mechanics and looting billions in

Planet Distance r X 106km

PlanetOrbit T

Orbit speedv in km/sec

LessEarthspeed

Spinspeedkm/sec

Angularvelocity; v/rarc sec/ century

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74


5/116

funds and garbage for science for a data transfer with a toddler arithmetic failure when datawas transferred from Earth to Sun a time delay happened with data was transferred becausedata transfer from Earth to Sun means motion and everything else has to move with it and inthis case Mercury data transfer from Earth to Sun should add an angular velocity of Mercury'svelocity divided by the distance the data were transferred. It is a time delay correction and not

space - time travel.The time delay is:

W" = (v/R) (180/) (3600) (26526/T); R = Earth - Sun DistanceFor MercuryW" = (47.9/149,600,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century

I have had known about this for almost four decades. As a starter; let me show youhow to outsmart Nobel Prize winner scientists one of them or all at one time . Ifound Alfred Nobel physicists silly to say the least in summer of 1972. In 1969 I was

12 in 5th grade going to 6th grade and I studied the circle in that year. In kindergarden and elementary school early years young kids are taught to waste time colorand scribble and I attempted to draw and my drawings of human faces and naturecame out as pieces of geometrical figures like a face came out with a triangular jawand circular eyes and oval lips and I realized that I would be better if my drawingswere geometrical figures. From third grade and to 5th grade I had a set of rulersand a compass and knew how to draw a circle and concentric circles. When I studied

circles I learned about angular speed by dividing the circumference x d by timetraveled or v = d /tand not the diameter by time traveled d/t. One of the thingsmy teacher mentioned was the angle traveled () per time (t) or the angular speed

/t = v/r; r = radius.I practiced these formulas that summer of 1969 Hippie days and Wood stocks andmusic and a man on the moon. In summer of 1969 I drew three concentric circles:

One with radius r (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet MercuryTwo with radius r (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet VenusThree with radius r (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet Earth

And assigned three speeds dreaming of space travel watching the space race

One with speed v (m) for bicycle one and named it after first planet MercuryTwo with speed v (v) for bicycle two and named it after second planet VenusThree with speed v (e) for bicycle three and named it after third planet EarthThen I made the division and got the angular speedsOr velocity/radius /t = v/r; with units of radians/second


6/116


7/116

When v (m)/r (m) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (m) added to itAnd when measured at Perihelion it still had a v (e)/ T (m) r (m) added to it

Per a century 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m); T (Mercury) = 88days

In degreesW = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/)In minutesW '= 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60)In secondsW" = 36528 days v (e)/ T (m) days r (m) x (180/) (60) (60)

= 43.0 "per century.With v (e) {Erath speed - Earth spin speed} = [28.9 km/sec - 0.0465 km/sec] and r

(m) 58.2 x 10 9m = mean distance of planet mercury from the sun.W"(m) = [v (e)/ r (m)] [36528/T (m)] (180/) (3600) = 43.0"/centuryFor planet Mercury

The mistake is for Planet Venus is v (e)/r (v); or, light aberrationWhen v (v)/r (v) was measured it was always had v (e)/r (v)

T (v) = 224.7, v (e) = [28.9 km/sec - 0.0465 km/sec]; r (v) = 58.2 x 10 9mW"(m) = [v (e)/ r (v)] [36528/T (v)] (180/) (3600) = 9.0"/centuryFor Planet Venus

The concentric games I played in 5th grade drawings and multiplying and dividingnumbers gave me a hint and an idea in summer of 1972 when I read about

planetary motion around the sun from a book about astronomers named CopernicusGalileo Kepler's and Newton

These numbers 43.0"/centuy and 9.0"/century are used as the First of the experimentalproofs of Modern physics and they were the first proof of Einstein's general relativitytheory.

Math page I

Abstarct: Le Verrier mistake

Actual value is ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v (e)]/rUsed value: ' = v/r = v (m)/rMissing Value ' = [v* (e) + v (e)]/rThe Mistake is '(e) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (180/) (3600) (36526/T)

And v* (e) = Earth orbital velocity = 29.8 km/secAnd v (e) = Earth rotational velocity = 0.465And v* - v = 29.335km/sec


8/116

With Areal r' = h = r v; ' = v/r Kepler's lawOr Angular Velocity ' = v/r from my 5th grade book Arithmetic bookThe 400 years Mistake is measurements of ' = v/rIf we are measuring this angular velocity from Earth for Mars then:Astronomers use:

This, ' = v/r = v (m)/r = velocity of Mercury / Distance of Mercury from the SunBut the Actual value is ' = v/r = v (m)/r + [v* (e) + v (e)]/rThe Missing Value '(e) = [v* (e) + v (e)]/r is the mistakeAnd '(e) = [v* (e) + v (e)]/r radians/secondThe Mistake is '(e) = [v* (e) +/- v (e)]/r (180/) (3600) (36526/T)

For MercuryAnd v* (e) = Earth orbital velocity = 29.8 km/secAnd v (e) = Earth rotational velocity = 0.465And v* - v = 29.335km/secAnd r (Mercury) = (58.2 x 106 km)And r = Mercury's (planet) mean distance

And ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106

km) radians/second= [(29.335km/sec)/ (58.2 x 106 km)] [(180/) (3600) (36526/88)] arc sec /century= 43.1" arc-sec/100 years

For Venus: ' = (29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)= [(29.335km/sec)/ (108.2 x 106 km)] [(180/) (3600) (36526/224.7)]= 9.09" arc-sec/100 years

Or W" = (29.8 - 0.065/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88) = 43.0 " /century

This mistake of 43 seconds of an arc in measuring the orbital speed of planetmercury is taken as planet Mercury plays hide and seek disappearing in time and

coming later somewhere else!Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space - time as a visual Illusionat 14 made me realize that not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics andphysicists are wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.

But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972

Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered anotherone that gave me the same results

Math page IIBut the Actual value is ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a]And v (M) = [GM/ (m + M) a]And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a] + v (M) = [Gm/ (m + M) a]

= [G (m + M)/ a]


9/116

And ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r= [G (m + M)/ a] Radians per seconds

In degree per century

Then ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T)

Advance of Perihelion

Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solutionWith m = 0.23 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 mAnd M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 88 daysWith ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/centuryThen ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)

= 43.0 arc sec per centuryVenus Advance of perihelion motion solution

With m = 4.868 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 108.2 x 109 mAnd M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 224.7 daysWith ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/centuryThen ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)

= 9.0 arc sec per century

These damn Arithmetic mistakes are the stupid things called experimental proofs ofmodern space - to imaginary time - back to space claims of modern physics comingout of the "magic sock" of University Professors physics. The 43 seconds of an arcper century is presented by "University" physicists proudly as the first experimentalproof of time travel taught by Nobel Prize winners to their PHD's students in four

years! All of Modern Physics experimental proofs are rigging like this!

This data transfer problem has a formula

Real time = Event time + time delays

The mistake is

Real time = Event time


10/116

Then make - believe relativity theory came to explain the time delays puzzlesthrough making up stuff like space - to imaginary time - back to space Hollywoodstudios make - believe time travel physics.

Quantum mechanics came to explain the visual illusion seen in the lab one time you

find things in event time and one time you find things in real time andyou dig yourface again? What?

Time t is a human made scale for our convenience and comfort in understandingevents and time is not a dimension like space (x, y, z) = (length, width, height) toallow space - to time - back to space jumping continuum (x, y, z, t) = (length,width. height, imaginary time) used and taught by physicists regardless of what allthe 150,000 Modern living physicists have to say about it and regardless of what thedead 250,000 physicists had to say about it because physicists have no proof ofspace - time continuum (x, y, z, t) physics; I care the less what Nobel Prizewinners or anyone had to say about it either because we can travel in space andunless physicists have a time travel bus with Einstein driving they can keep thetrash to themselves. The only proof of space - to imaginary time - back to spacecontinuum is that Physicists have no proof of space - to imaginary time - back tospace continuum. What physicists claim as space - time travel continuum or theprocess of jumping from space - to imaginary time - back to space continuum (x, y,z, t) experimental proofs are nothing and add up to a smoke of nothing. Space-time is nothing more than absolute garbage and a signature of "University"Professors fraud and stupidity. Building modern physics on space-time made physicsa stupidity taught in classrooms and made scientific calculations as good as gypsyfortune telling and all the Nobel Prizes that was won based on space time physics I

can prove it as wrong physics and wrong physics is space -time confusion of physicsbecause it is all a made out visual illusions and nothing more than PHD idiots andNobel PHD Idiots taking time dependent measurements wrong for 350 years andbullying humanity for funds. Space - Time continuum is not physics because I canprove it as visual illusion and a visual illusion only. It is time for change; regimechange. It is not just Einstein Feynman and all other 110 years of Nobel prizewinners bullying physicists are wrong but what I am writing is that all physicist arewrong for past 350 years and I dare all to prove me wrong. My name is Joe Nahhasand I am the greatest physicist of all time and here it is your chance to look andyour chance to have a say and if you can prove me wrong then I will delete it and

go work at Macdonald's but for now I can say without hesitation that sending the150,000 living Modern space time Physicists to work at Macdonald's has no negativeeffect on the subject of Physics and on the contrary it would have a much positiveeffect and nothing has better positive effect than taking stupidity out of classroomsand out of scientific calculations. Here it is and remember Macdonald's is hiring:

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.We can only see and measure something that had happened. What we


11/116

measure in not what happened. We measure in present time an eventthat happened in past time. That is we measure past events in presenttimePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]

Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delaysReal time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delaysphysicsWhat one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event +relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real timerelativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delays

Quantum = Newton + relativity

= t + ( - t)Real time = Event time + time delays = t + (x) + (y) = t (/t)

= t e t;/t = e t; t = arc tan (v/c) = t [cosine t + sine t] = (x) + (y) = t cosine t + t sine t (x) = t cosine t = t {1 - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = (x) - t = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] (y) = sine t = sine arc tan (v/c)

This is time delays and this formula (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Erases Einstein's relativity stupidity and Feynman quantum mechanicsstupidity in its entirety and all of relativity and quantum mechanics based

theories

This following High school math formula

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

Is the greatest one mistake physicists make every day and it is the oneformula that has to be accounted for in every day physics work and in


12/116

every time, time dependent measurements are made and every timesignals and not measuring tape is used as means of measurements. Thisone mistake is the mother of all mistakes in human history of science andit is as old as physics itself. This one mistake not new and it goes back tothe start of science because light had been studied for all of past

centuries and this one mistake is a rule of nature and a mistake thatnever been accounted for and outlasted all physicists of past centuriesand it is one that nature has and was missed and in the process creepyphysics called Modern physics called relativistic quantum mechanics andall physics that was based on relativistic quantum mechanics and wasmade to explain the consequences of this one mistake when this onemistake is a beautiful and a simple rule of nature.

For example, this equation explains the first experimental proof of space -time travel and the first experimental of experimental proof generalrelativity theory dearest to Einstein applied to planet mercury.

(x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]Where t = 100 years = 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 seconds

And using the 1/2 cycle measurements

(x) /2 = - t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] secondsAnd v = v (m) [Mercury] - v (e) [Earth]

= 47.9 km/sec - 29.8 km/sec = 18.1 km/secOr W" = (15/2) (x) = (7.5)t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)] arc seconds

W" = 7.5 x 100 x 23.9345 x 3600 x sine [(1/2) arc tan (18.1/300,000)]= 43.0" arc seconds per 100 years

Another example: this equation explains the much bragged about 1/5amplitude of Richard Feynman experimental proof of space - to imaginarytime - back to space stupidity travel and the experimental proof of his"crown jewel"

This following High school math formula (x) = - 2 t sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]

With n = v/c = 1/1.33 = 3/4 (x) = 1/5

Visual Illusions deception are common in modern physics becausemodern physics study light and light spectrum and the entire spectrum ormatter that has mass m and a location r. When light is used as signals tomeasure motion of traveling objects motion and mass from within atraveling lab everything that is measured will include time delays and will


13/116


14/116

Modern physicists made this mistake one way or another starting with Newton'shimself. Its origin is when measurements are taken of moving objects.

Kepler'sAreal speed lawstold us about this mistake

Or, r (1) ' (1) = r (2) '(2) = location x speed = constant= Areal velocity

Or, ' (1) = {[r (2)/ r (1)]} ' (2)And ' (1) - ' (2) = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2)

' = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} ' (2)This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion

The angular speed is ' = v/rFor Mercury: ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/secIf you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", thenAnd W" = (v/r) (180/) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per centuryIf it is measured for planet Mercury thenW" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/) (3600) (26526/88)W"= 70.29 arc second per century

Or, W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2)

What is the angular visual Illusion that would be seen when measured

from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 10

6

And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

And W" (2) = 70.29 arc sec /century

W" = {{[r (2)/ r (1)]} - 1} W" (2) W" = {{ [58.2/ 149.6]} - 1} 70.29 = 43.0" arc per century


15/116

We went to the Lab and measured the force between two balls and theforce measurements was fit into an equation that came out as

Newton's Gravitational law told us about this mistakeNewton changed Kepler's law correctly from:

T/a = 4 /GMTo T/a = 4 /G (M + m)

That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data are centeredat the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this:

T (1)/a = 4 /GM and

T (2) /a = 4 /G (M + m)

When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as shown:

The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton

T (1) = T (2) [M/ (M + m)]

And 2/ T (1) = [2 / T (2)] (1 + m/M)

And ' (1) = ' (2) (1 + m/M)

And ' (2) = ' (1) / [1 + (m/M)] [1 - m/ (2M)]

This approximation was not on the original work

And ' (2) - ' (1) = ' (1) [1 / [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

Planet Distance r X 106km

PlanetOrbit T

Orbit speedv in km/sec

LessEarthspeed

Spinspeedkm/sec

Angularvelocity; v/rarc sec/ century

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74


16/116

And ' (2) - ' (1) - ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 /T] [m/2M) = - m/MT radians/T

W " (calculated) = [- m/MT] (180/ degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days

With m = 0.32 x1024 kg

And M = 2.0 x1030

kgT = 88 days

W' (calculated) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years

There are many more ways to get to prove that the 43 seconds of an arc of Planet Mercuryaxis tilt in 100 years is just an arithmetic mistake

One of the ways that can be used to explain it is making up stuff like Einstein did and that ismaking up stuff. For example making up another gravitational force

Einstein added k/ r4

to Newton's - Kepler's Gravitational force laws F = - GmM/rOr, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/rBecame Einstein's Gravitational law to explain the 43 arc sec per centuryOr, F = - GmM/r + k/ r4; Einstein law

Einstein has no proof of the existence of this extra force + k/ r4

He used and dwelled on the arithmetic mistake to claim that this is due to time travel

This make - up physics or rigging made by Einstein is fraud

Let us make - up a force and prove the same thing Einstein proved!

How about a force of inverse cube law - k/rLet us use this make - up and beat Alfred Nobel Physicists

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Acceleration = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

And

S = m r; State = mass x distance

P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rVelocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in mass

F =d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t


17/116


18/116

F = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)]+2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1)= [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1)= [-GmM/r] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:First r = r[cosine + sine ] = rr (1)

Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r'[- sine + cosine ]

= r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Define (1) = -sine +cosine ;And with r (1) = cosine + sine

Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1)And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1)

Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t= r" r(1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t = (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = - k/ r; Inverse Cube Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's law (2)

With m = constant

Then d r/dt - 'r = - k/ r (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 (2)

From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = hFrom (1), ' d r/ d - 'r = - k/ mr

And ' [d r/ d - r] = - k/ mrAnd d r/ d - r = - (k/mh) r

And d r/ d - r [1 - (k/mh)] = 0

And r (, 0) = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]}

From (2) d (r')/d t = 0; r' = h

Then 2rr'' + r'' = 0Dividing by r'

We get 2 (r'/r) + (''/') = 0And 2 (r'/r) = - ''/' = 2 tAnd r = r (0, 0) Exp { [1 - (k/mh)]} Exp t


19/116

And ' = ' (, 0) Exp - 2 tOrr = r (0, 0) Exp [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]

And ' = ' (0, 0) Exp -2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t]

And ' = (' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t] - sine 2 [{ [1 - (k/h)]} + t]}And ' - ' (0, 0) = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]And ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ [1 - (k/mh)]} + t]

If k = Gm M ; h = 2 a b/TThen ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (GMT/4ab)]} + t]

Taking Kepler's: T/4a = 1/GM = 1/G MAnd GM = 4a/ T; GM T = 4a And (GMT/4ab) = a /b

Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine [{ (1 - a /b)} + t]If = mb/aMThen ' = - 2 ' (0, 0)] sine [{ [1 - (m/ M)]} + t]If = 0Then ' = - 2 ' (0, 0) sine tAnd ' (0, 0) = h/r = 2ab/Ta (1 - )

= 2a (1 - )/Ta (1 - ) = 2 (1 - )/T (1 - ) And ' = - 4 (1 - )/ T (1 - ) sine t

With T = arc tan v/c


20/116

If m/ M


21/116

and not as a Newton's gravitational force or Einstein's space-time confusion of force or anyother force and this new gravitation equation is:With d (m r)/dt (m r) ' = [-GmM/r]Exp(m / M r) Nuclear gravity Equation (1)And (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)

Solution:All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a locationr = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment= change of location + change of mass= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = dS/dt = Total force= m (dr/dt) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (dm/dt) r= m + 2m'v +m" r; = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = rr (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r ' (1) ; = (r" - r')r(1) + (2r'' + r ")(1)r = location; v = velocity; = accelerationF = m + 2m'v +m" rF = m [(r"-r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)]+2m'[r' r (1) + r ' (1)] + (m" r) r (1)

= [d (m r)/dt - (m r) '] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (mr')/d t] (1)

= [-GmM/r] r(1)

------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational LawProof:First r = r[cosine + sine ] = rr (1)Define r (1) = cosine + sine Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r'[- sine + cosine ]

= r' r (1) + r ' (1)

Define (1) = -sine +cosine ;And with r (1) = cosine + sine

Then d [ (1)]/d t= ' [- cosine - sine = - ' r (1)And d [r (1)]/d t = ' [-sine + cosine ] = ' (1)

Define = d [r' r (1) + r ' (1)] /d t= r" r(1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' ' r (1) + r " r (1) +r 'd [ (1)]/d t

= (r" - r') r (1) + (2r'' + r ") (1)

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)


22/116

And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

(2): d (mr')/d t = 0

Then mr' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r' = h

And (1): d r/dt - r ' = -GmM/rLet m r =1/uThen d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r/dt = -h'du/d = - hu [du/d]

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Nuclear Gravity (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

-hu [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = -GMu [1 ( m/M) u]; m/M r


23/116

Planet Mercury 43" seconds of arc per century elliptical orbit axial rotation rate

Einstein has a similar equation

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/ (r) Einstein's Space-time (1)

And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)With r (, 0) = a (1 )/[1 + cosine ( )]And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T)(3600)=43.03''

Newton's force -GmM/r if corrected to [ GmM/r] Exp (m /M r) gives exact solutionwithout make-believe 20th century confusion of physics unless you have been to time travelbuss station of a 1956 live Elvis show! Then I will bow

Then (Venus) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Venus)] = 8.426826168''

And (Earth) = [43.03''] [T/2T (Earth)] = 5.184''

The advance of perihelion of Venus and Earth never been measured but badly approximatedand deduced and the reason for that is the very small value and Venus looks like a star andnot a planet. For centuries Astronomers are yet to have reliable data of Venus like its rotationvelocity. In recent years astronomers gave 6.5 km/sec for its rotational speed from its lightspectrum; however, V= 2r/p; r = Venus radius and p = Venus rotational period comes to fewmeters per seconds and not few kilometers per second indicating 400 years of astronomy thatclaims to know how the Universe was born and how it will end when the have no clue thespeed of a planet that can been seen 24/7 from satellites.

Einstein equation is

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/ (r) Einstein's Space-time (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

With r (, 0) = a (1 )/ [1 + cosine ( )]

And = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''

There is nothing unique about itIt is a made up physics

It works on plant Mercury

It does not work anywhere else


24/116

In 1959 there was an article in science magazine that said if Relativity is to be testedproperly then it should be applied to binary stars or two stars systems.

Relativity theory failed the test with two star systems and this equation failed and itfailed it very bad and yes this formula:

Or, = [6GM/ac (1 )] radians/second x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) = 43.03''

Does not work anywhere else

Why Nobel Prize winners insist on teaching this formula and teaching relativity theory whenEinstein's relativity theory is proven wrong is a signature of the scientific character:Nobel Prize winner physicists are representative of the big institutions Mafia and a Nobelprize winner physicist will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs moneyprestige and a cut in the hundreds of millions of dollars the institution that backed him up andreceived massive funding for their research boats dogs and mistresses.

We went to the Lab andIn the Lab the force between two balls was measured: F = -GmM/rAnd Newton F = m And got this equation

ThenWith d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)

With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

Then he solved his equation like this

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)


AndS = m r; State = mass x distanceP = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rVelocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in massF =d P/d t = d S/d t = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

= m d r/d t + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r


25/116

F = m d r/d t + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) rForce = Change of momentumF = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r

F = - GmM/r

Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/rThenWith d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)

With d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (r')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

The solution is as followsFrom 2: With m = constant; then d (mr')/d t = 0And m d (r')/d t = 0And d (r')/d t = 0And r' = h

With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/rWith m = constantThen m [d r/ d t - r '] = - Gm M/ rAnd [d r/ d t - r '] = - G M/ r

Let r =1/uThen d r/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = - h d u/d And d r /d t = - h 'du/d = - h u [du/d]

And - h u [du/d] - (1/u) (hu) = - G Mu

Or, [du/ d] + u = G M/ h u = G M/ h + A cosine And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h + A cosine ]

= (h/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah/ GM) cosine ]= (h/GM)/ (1 + cosine )

Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )

This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this equationand we got the motion equation: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Which is the equation ofan ellipse with eccentricity and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis b = a [1 - ]and two foci one equals to c = a, and the other foci location equals to - c = - a. Or themotion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with the other ball at one of the


26/116

foci +/- a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a) on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b)on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again with angle of rotation . If this law to work on twoplanets instead of two balls like planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers shouldsee this motion of a planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.

When astronomers turned their telescopes to confirm the force law F = -GmM/r and see ifplanetary motion around the Sun abide by this law and attempt to see a planet moves in anellipse around the sun with the sun at one of the foci of that ellipse, they saw an ellipse withrotating axes instead.

Solution of-GmM/r: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] they did not see this

But insteadthey saw thisThat is they saw r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] tThis is the equation of an ellipse with rotating axes.The difference is /t = [(r)+ (r)] tAnd (r) = 0Are Newton's - Kepler's laws wrong?

Einstein and 110 years of Nobel Prize winner physicists said Hell Ya they are wrong

Relativity theory in its entirety said Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

Quantum mechanics Physicists had been saying Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong

Modern Physics is based on Newton's - Kepler's laws are wrong100,000 PHD living physicists said Newton's laws are wrong100,000 PHD dead physicists said Newton's laws are wrong100,000 PHD Physicists web pages said Newton's laws are wrongModern physicists brag about the assumption that Newton's equations were wrong and thatrelativity theory and quantum mechanics and other theories are needed to explain newexperimental results

Now who is wrong the experimenter in the Lab who measured F = -GmM/r

Or, Einstein is wrong?And Einstein added k/r4

And made F = -GmM/r + k/r4

And made new equations and deleted Newton's equation

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r + k/r4; Einstein's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)


27/116

And the New solution became: r (, t) = a (1-)/ [(1+ cosine ( - w)]Where w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/centuryG = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 mM = 2 x 1030 kgAnd T = 88 days for planet Mercury to give

Where w" = [6GM/ Ta (1- )] (180/) (36526) (3600) arc-sec/century= 43.0" arc sec/centuryAnd this was experimentally correct?The world sided with Einstein because the theory fits with the experiment

When Einstein formulas were used on binary stars motion it failed!Binary stars is a two stars system and should behave like a planet and a sun or one starmoving around the other star in the same manner a planet moves around the Sun

Why Physicists and Astrophysicists insist on Einstein's formula when there is dozens of

documented cases where Einstein's formulas fail?Scientists added rotational distortions term to rescue relativity theory and quantummechanics because both are based on space time stupidity beside + k/r4term to come closerto experimental results and for every hit it missed a thousand times. It is not only Einsteinis wrong but all physicists and astrophysicists are yet to know how to use atelescope!

There is nothing wrong with the experimenter in the Lab or F = -GmM/rAnd there is nothing wrong with Newton's - Kepler's equations

These equations are correct

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

Real time = Event time + time delaysThe old solution is an event time orbit solutionOr, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )]

The real time orbit solution is: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)

+ (r)] t

The difference between the two solutions is time delays visual effects thatexplains planet Mercury's motion or any motion for that matter correctlyevery time without space - time relativistic confusions or stupidity physics

"Apparent advance of perihelion is given by this formula"


28/116

Their real time orbit produces an angular visual effect of:W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

With v* = Mercury's velocity = 47.9 km/secAnd v = Mercury's spin velocity of 3m/sec

And c = light velocity of 300,000 km/secAnd = 0.206And (1-)/ (1-) = 1.552And v+ v* = 47.9 km/sec + 3km/sec = 47.9 km/secGiving an angular rotation rate of W" = 43.0"

This formulaW" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 yearsW" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (47.9/300,000) arc seconds/100 years

= 43.0" arc sec /century

Said that Physicists are idiots and Astro physicists have no clue how to usethe telescope. Why? Because it works on every planetary system orsatellite system without any exception

For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved wrong.For 350 years Newton's - Kepler's equations were solved in event timeI have had known about this for almost four decades

Newton's Kepler's solution in real timeReal time two body problem

In Polar coordinates

With d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)And d (mr')/d t = 0 Central force law (2)

(2): d (mr')/d t = 0

Then mr' = constant= H (0, 0)= m (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r (0, 0) '(0, 0)= m (0, 0) r (0, 0) '(0, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, 0)] h (, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, 0)] [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, t)] [r (, t)] [' (, t)]= [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, t)]= [m(, 0) m(0,t)][ r(,0)r(0,t)]['(, 0) ' (0, t)]

With mr' = constantDifferentiate with respect to time


29/116

Then 2mm'r' + 2mrr'' + mr" = 0Divide by mr'Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + "/' = 0This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[ (m) + (m)]And 2(r'/r) = 2[ (r) + (r)]

And "/' = -2{ (m) + (r) + [ (m) + (r)]}Then (m'/m) = [ (m) + (m)]Or d m/m d t = [ (m) + (m)]And dm/m = [ (m) + (m)] d tThen m = m (0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t

m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) Exp [ (m) + (m)] tWith initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (, 0)And m = m (, 0) m (0, t) = m (, 0) Exp [ (m) + (m)] t; Exp = ExponentialAnd m (0, t) = Exp [ (m) + (m)] tSimilarly we can get

Also, r = r (, 0) r (0, t) = r (, 0) Exp [ (r) + (r)] tWith r (0, t) = Exp [ (r) + (r)] t

Then '(, t) = {H(0, 0)/[m(,0)r(,0)]}Exp{-2{[(m) + (r)]t + [(m) + (r)]t}} -----IAnd '(, t) = ' (, 0)]} Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t}} --------------------IAnd, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t)And ' (0, t) = Exp {-2{[ (m) + (r)] t + [ (m) + (r)] t}Also '(, 0) = H (0, 0)/ m (, 0) r (, 0)And '(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (0, 0)r (0, 0)]}

With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r = -GmM/mr

And d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ (mr)Let m r =1/uThen d (m r)/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = -H d u/d And d (m r)/dt = -H'du/d = - Hu [du/d]

-Hu [du/d] - (1/u) (Hu) = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) Mu[du/ d] + u = Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ H

t = 0; m (0, 0) = 1u = Gm (, 0) M/ H + A cosine =Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0)

And m r = 1/u = 1/ [Gm (, 0) M (, 0)/ h (, 0) + A cosine ]= [h/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ {1 + [Ah/ Gm (, 0) M (, 0)] [cosine ]}= [h/Gm (, 0) M (, 0)]/ (1 + cosine )

Then m (, 0) r (, 0) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] m (, 0)Dividing by m (, 0)Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+cos)


30/116

This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem which is the equation ofan ellipse of semi-major axis of length a and semi minor axis b = a (1 - ) and focus lengthc = aAnd m r = m (, t) r (, t) = m (, 0) m (0, t) r (, 0) r (0, t)Then, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] {Exp [(r) + (r)] t} ---------------------------------- II

This is Newton's time dependent equation that is missed for 350 yearsIf (m) 0 fixed mass and (r) 0 fixed orbit; thenThen r (, t) = r (, 0) r (0, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] Exp i (r) tAnd m = m (, 0) Exp [i (m) t] = m (, 0) Exp (m) t

We Have '(0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r (0, 0) = 2ab/ Ta (1-) = 2a [ (1-)]/T a (1-) = 2 [ (1-)]/T (1-)

Then '(0, t) = {2 [ (1-)]/ T (1-) } Exp {-2[ (m) + (r)] t= {2 [ (1-)]/ (1-) } {cosine 2[ (m) + (r)] t - sin 2[ (m) + (r)] t}

And '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1- 2sin [ (m) + (r)] t}- 2i '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t

Then '(0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2sine [ (m) t + (r) t]}- 2 '(0, 0) sin [ (m) + (r)] t cosine [ (m) + (r)] t

' (0, t) = Real ' (0, t) + Imaginary (0, t)Real (0, t) = '(0, 0) {1 - 2 sine [ (m) t (r) t]}

Let W (calculated) = ' (0, t) (observed) = Real (0, t) - '(0, 0)

= -2'(0, 0) sine [ (m) t + (r) t]= -2[2 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [ (m) t + (r) t]

W (Cal) = -4 {[ (1-)]/T (1-) ]} sine [ (m) t + (r) t]

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, thenWith, v = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity; v/c = tan (m) T; v*/c = tan (r) T*Where T = spin period; T* = orbital period

And (m) T = Inverse tan v/c; (r) T*= Inverse tan v*/cW (ob) = -4 [ (1-)]/T (1-) ] sine [Inverse tan v/c + Inverse tan v*/c] radiansMultiplication by 180/

W (ob) = (-720/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } sine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degreesand multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

W (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } xsine {Inverse tan [v/c + v*/c]/ [1 - v v*/c]} degrees/100 years


31/116

Approximations I

With v


32/116

At Perihelion: d r/d t - r ' = - GM/r = - r '; d r/d t = 0Then r ' = GM/rA quick answer by Newton would be

And First ' = [GM/r] Kepler's findingsFrames are related by the quotient of their velocities = arc tan (v m/ v n) and theadvance of perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or thequantity tan = (v m/ v n)= [(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)] = Earth speed and spin/Mercury speed and spinAdvance of perihelion Period is given by:Kepler's equation: = [GM/r] [(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]In arc sec / century

Then = {[GM/r]} 1/2{[(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T) = 43"/centuryG = gravitational constantM = sun massr = Mercury - Sun distance

These equations are correct


What is wrong is Modern space - time confusion of Physics

Real time = Event time + time delaysThe old solution is an event time orbit solutionOr, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )]

Nahhas' Equations:r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [

(r)+

(r)] t

W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

Being able to find new physics formulas that explain space - time as a visual Illusionat 14 made me realize that not only Einstein is wrong but all of physics andphysicists are wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.

But this was not the only find I discovered in summer of 1972

Kepler's equations were there to read and I discovered anotherone that gave me the same results

Math page IIBut the Actual value is ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a]


33/116

And v (M) = [GM/ (m + M) a]And v (m) = [GM/ (m + M) a] + v (M) = [Gm/ (m + M) a]

= [G (m + M)/ a]And ' = v/r = [v (m) + v (M)]/r

= [G (m + M)/ a] Radians per secondsIn degree per century

Then ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T)

Advance of Perihelion

Mercury Advance of perihelion motion solutionWith m = 0.23 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 58.2 x 109 m

And M (0) = 2 x 1030

kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109

meters; T = 88 daysWith ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/centuryThen ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (58.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)

= 43.0 arc sec per centuryVenus Advance of perihelion motion solution

With m = 4.868 x 10-6 M (0) and M = 1 M (0); G = 6.673 x 10- 11; a = 108.2 x 109 mAnd M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696 x 109 meters; T = 224.7 daysWith ' = { [G (m + M)/ a]} x (180/) (36526/T) (3600) arc sec/centuryThen ' = { [6.673 x 10- 11 x 2 x 1030]/ (108.2x109)]} (180/) (36526/88) (3600)

= 9.0 arc sec per century

In summer of 1973 I decided to tackle relativity and relativity theory starts withMichelson and Morley experiment.

One of the beautiful things I remember about old city of Beirut before the start ofthe civil war in June 1973 and exploded in April 1975 is the abundance ofentertainment. Reading as a cheap entertainment was/is available to people ofLebanon where I was born and on Sundays during summer time the old Martyr

square and surrounding areas side walks that changed to a flea market of used andnew books and open publishing houses beside restaurants and movie theatres.There on the streets of old Beirut from 1968 - 1974 I walked through the greatestlibrary I knew. Scientists are made in JR High. College is an opportunity to becomeone. On those summers I bought books and magazines in many subjects and in twolanguages that I can read write and speak that is English and Arabic. I started withCartoon magazines then short stories then long stories then Lyrics of western music


34/116

to novels or crafts to philosophy or science and everything that was there and I canafford and looked interesting. One of the books I bought was how to make a reel ofcartoon movies.

In summer of 1973 at age 15 I made a reel of the progress of light Points to see

how this space - time in the frame work of Michelson and Morley experiment workand after few weeks and piles of drawings I realized the theory behind theexperiment is fraud and could never work. I realized that the theory is in stationarytime and what is measured is in real time proving my earlier finding which is ifsomeone to measure others motion like measuring planets motion around the sunfrom earth and not from the sun then there will be errors from planets to earth andthese were not being accounted for.

Newton's equations should be wrong too because Newton did the same mistakewhen he changed Kepler's laws.

In summer of 1974 I figured something else wrong and what was wrong withNewton's changing Kepler's law.

Math Pages III: Newton Changed Kepler's law from T/a = 4 /GM to T/a = 4 /G(M + m) and introducing an error like this T (1)/a = 4 /GM and T (2) /a = 4 /G (M +m)When Newton changed Kepler's equation he created the advance of perihelion as shown:

The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton

T (1) = T (2) [M/ (M + m)]And 2/ T (1) = [2 / T (2)] (1 + m/M)And ' (1) = ' (2) (1 + m/M)And ' (2) = ' (1) / [1 + (m/M)] [1 - m/ (2M)]

This approximation was not on the original workAnd ' (2) - ' (1) = ' (1) [1 / [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

And ' (2) - ' (1) - ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 /T] [m/2M) = - m/MT radians/TW " (calculated) = [- m/MT] (180/ degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = daysW' (observed) = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years; by

Newton.This was the 3rd formula that I found to explain the 43 seconds of an arc per centuryfor mercury beside Einstein's space - timeW" (observed) = 6GM/Tac (1 - ) = [6 / T (1 - )] (v/c) ; v =orbital velocityW " (observed) = [6 / T (1 - )] (v/c) (180/ degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 (century)W " (observed) = [1080x 36526x 3600/ T (1 - )] (v/c) arc sec/ 100 years Einstein


35/116

Newton and Einstein made the same mistake because their formula was rigged to cater for planet Mercuryusing different reference time frames and introducing mistakes. First mistake was Newton's mistake

because using different frames of reference introduces time delay errors. When Newton changed frames ofreference he took mass m and implemented = m [M/ (M + m)] and we stuck with an error or shortagefactor in mathematical form amount to M/ (M + m). After Newton astronomers were puzzled by theperihelion advance of planet Mercury not investigating its origin. The time delay error to changing framesof reference is this formula for the angle at closet approach is:

Then I found another oneMath pages IV

This is how in 1973 at age 15 found space -time to be a joke.First ' = [GM/r] Kepler's findings

Second: If ' is seen as ' + ; = period of advance of perihelion:Then, (' + ) = [GM/r]

When I read Michelson and Morley experiment I found it defective. They theory is inone time frame and the experiment set up is in another time frame and the two timeframes are related by the quotient of their velocities = arc tan (v m/ v n) and theadvance of perihelion is the opposite of the Michelson experiment or thequantity tan = (v m/ v n)= [(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]Advance of perihelion Period is given by:

Kepler's Nahhas equation: = [GM/r] [(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]

In arc sec / centuryThen = {[GM/r]} 1/2{[(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T)]= 42.98 arc sec per century for mercury

Where v* = orbital speed of earth; v = spin speed of earthAnd v** = orbital speed of observed Planet and v = spin speed of observed Planet

And r = mean distance f planet from the sun

Is there any more?Then = {[G (m + M)/r]} 1/2{[(v* +/- v)/ (v** +/- v)]} 1/2 [(180/) (3600) (36526/T)]

Is there anymore?

Has to beIf space-time is visual effects then I should be able to find the values of

planet Mercury and Venus from a time perspective

Find the time dependent formula and change the value of time in seconds to anangle in arc seconds by multiplying by 15.

In 1974 I got this


36/116

Math pages V

Abstract: Ending relativity from classrooms and scientific calculations startswith ending Nobel Prize winner Physicists wrong physics and it starts with the

grand mistake called relativity theory. Relativity theory is based on the fact thatlight measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure lightprojections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but wemeasure r cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequenceinstead of measuring time T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here isthe experimental proof of it.

Your eyes

A000 00000 0000 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 (2)0 0 00 (1)0 0 (3)0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0

1 2 3The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1 and

2 and 3 is ABIf the angle between ray 1 and AB is (1)If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (2)

If the angle between ray 1 and AB is (3)Then C (1) cosine (1) = C (2) cosine (2) = C (3) cosine (3) = c = ABYou want experimental proof?


37/116

Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the lightprojections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion and stars tosolve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars better than all is

If an object at location A sends light signals in all directions at time at t = 0 where B1 is;And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured. AB1 is theorizedand AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine ; = arc tan (v/c)B1B2 /AB1 = sine ; AB2/AB1 = cosine ; B1B2/AB2 = tan Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time = t cosine

A Light V E L O C I T Y B2O O O O O O O O O O

O C OO O

O OO V O

O OO O

O OO O

OB1

= t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}} - t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}Astronomers use 1/2 cycleThen ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v


38/116

For Venus Velocity instead of Earth's VelocityThat is: 35.1[Venus orbital speed] + 6.52 [Venus spin speed] - 29.8 = 11.82 km/secHalf - ( - t)/2 = - 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) = 4.592821605Of arc sec per centuryFull ( - t) = - 2 x 3.75 x [36526 x 24 x 3600] x (11.82/300,000) = 9.18654321

Of arc sec per centuryAfter 400 years of stupidity in reading telescopes it is time to tell the crooks and idiots:

( - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c)

This is the proof of relativity stupidityThen In 1975 with school life ended I became a practicing Physicist at age 17.

In 1975 I found complex numbers and it changed everything.

Math pages VI

= (x) + (y) = t e (x) = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}}(x) - t = 2 t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}Astronomers use 1/2 cycleThen ( - t)/2 = - t sine {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; If v


39/116

After 400 years of stupidity in reading telescopes it is time to tell the crooks and idiots:

( - t)/2 = 3.75 t (v/c) In 1974 I had found Schaum's outline series and in 1975 I bought three of them

and in 1975 I had a dozen and in 1976 I had a shelf full of them and every solutionand mechanics book I could put my hands on

= t + ( - t)Real time = Event time + time delays = t + (x) + (y) = t (/t)

= t e t;/t = e t; t = arc tan (v/c) = t [cosine t + sine t] = (x) + (y) = t cosine t + t sine t

(x) = t cosine t = t {1 - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = (x) - t = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (y) = sine t = sine arc tan (v/c)

Then it hit me hard in 1976

Where in Mechanics I can find this equation?

Math pages VII

= t

e

t;/t =

e

t; t = arc tan (v/c)

Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.We can only see and measure something that had happened. What wemeasure in not what happened. We measure in present time an eventthat happened in past time. That is we measure past events in presenttimePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delays

Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physicsWhat one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delaysQuantum = Newton + relativity


40/116

= t + ( - t)Real time = Event time + time delays = t + (x) + (y) = t (/t) = t e t;/t = e t; t = arc tan (v/c) = t [cosine t + sine t] = (x) + (y) = t cosine t + t sine t (x) = t cosine t = t {1 - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = (x) - t = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (x) = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]} (y) = sine t = sine arc tan (v/c)This is time delays and this formula erases Einstein's relativity in its entirety and all ofrelativity based theories (x) = - 2 sine [(1/2) arc tan (v/c)]}Relativistic confusions is time delays

In 1976 I started figuring out the whole thing

Chapter one: Real time mathematics

Real time location

An object at an absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factorof[(r)] t and a rotation motion factor of[ (r)] t is introduced to a total factor of[(r)+ (r)] t and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as: S = r[(r)+ (r)] t

1- Real time: We can not see or measure something that did not happen.We can only see and measure something that had happened. What wemeasure in not what happened. We measure in present time an eventthat happened in past time. That is we measure past events in presenttimePresent time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + relativistic time delaysReal time = event time + real time relativistic delaysReal time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays physics

What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic delaysWhat happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects.Observer time = traveller time + time delaysReal time = absolute time + time delaysReal time = Event time + time delays

= t + ( - t) Equation 1- a = t + Equation 1- b


41/116

2 - Real time location

An object at of absolute location r when measured in real time a translational or decay factor

of[(r)] t

and a rotation motion factor of[ (r)] t

is introduced to a total factor of[(r)

+

(r)] t and the location of an object r when measured in real time it will measure as:

S = r[(r)+ (r)] t Equations 2

3 - A - Real time location along the line of measurement andB - Real time location Perpendicular to the line of measurement.

S = r[(r)+ (r)] t = r [(r)] t (r) t

S = S x + S y = r [(r)] t [cosine t+ sine t]

Real time location along the line of measurement isS x = r [(r)] tcosine t Equations 3- aS x = r [(r)] t [1 - sine t]Real time location perpendicular to the line of measurement isS y = r [

(r)] tsine t Equations 3 - b

4 - Real time location in rectangular coordinates

Location r = x+ y + z k

Velocity v = (d x/d t)(d y/d t) + (d z/d t) k

Acceleration = (dx/dt)(dy/dt) + (dz/dt) k

S = r [(r)+ (r)] t

S = [x+ y + z k] [(r)+ (r)] t Equations 4

5 - Real time location in Polar Coordinates

Location r = rr (1)

Velocity v = r' r (1) + r ' (1)


S = rr (1)[(r)+ (r)] t Equations 5


42/116

6 - Real time location in Cylindrical coordinates system

Location r = (1) + z

Velocity v = ' (1) + r ' (1) + z';

Acceleration = ( " - ') (1) + (2 '' + ") (1) + z''

S = r [(r)+ (r)] t

S = [ (1) + z][(r)+ (r)] t Equations 6

7 - Real time location in Spherical coordinates system

Location r = r [r, , ] = rr (1)Velocity v = r' r (1)+ r ' sine (1)+ r '(1)Acceleration = [r" - r ('sine + ')] r (1)+ [1/rsine ] [d (r ' sine )/d t] (1) + {(1/r) [d (r')/d t] - r ' sine cosine } (1)S = rr (1)[(r)+ (r)] t Equations 7

8 - Real time VelocityLet S = r [(r)+ (r)] t

Then Velocity = P = d S /d t = {[(d r/ d t) + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] tP = {[v + r[ (r) + (r)]} [(r)+ (r)] t Equation 8

9 - Real time AccelerationF =d P/ d t = d S/ d tF = { + 2 [ (r) + (r)] v - [ (r) + (r)] r} [(r)+ (r)] t Equation 9

10 - A - Real time location rotational aberration along the line of measurement andB-Real time location rotational aberration perpendicular to the line of measurement

Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocityVelocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line ofmeasurement velocity

Along the line of measurementThen S x = r [(r)] t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] Equation 10 - aPerpendicular to line of measurementsAnd S y = r [

(r)] tsine arc tan (v/c) Equation 10 - b

11 - Real time location motion rotational aberrations Visual effects:A - Along the line of measurement


43/116

B - Perpendicular to the line of measurementS x = r [(r)] t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)]With (r) = 0ThenS x = r [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] Equation 11 - a

With (v/c)


44/116

14 - Time delays conceptsA - Along the line of measurementB - Perpendicular to the line of measurementC - Real time delays

S = r[(r)

+ (r)] t

S = c And r = c t = t [(r)+ (r)] t = t {cosine [ (r) + (r)] t + sine [ (r) + (r)] t}With (r) = 0Taking (r) t = arc tan (v/c); v = velocity; c = light or signal velocityVelocity v could be orbital, or, spin, or, orbital and spin and it is a perpendicular to the line ofmeasurement velocityWith = 0; = t [ (r)] t

And = t [cosine t + sine t]And (x) = t cosine t = t [1 - 2 sine ( t/2)] = (x) - t = - 2 t sine ( t/2) (x) = t cosine (r) t = t [1 - sinearc tan (v/c)] (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c)With (v/c)


45/116

= - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/- v*)/c]sec/ century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v +/-v*)/c] arc sec/century

Since idiots are idiots and some times 1/2 period scientists use instead of a full period youwould find many cases that two Astrophysicists give an answer and one double the other'sanswer like in the most famous case in astronomy and that would be Dr Guinan of VillanovaUniversity with DI Herculis apsidal motion of 0.65 1985 and DR Martynov of 1.3 in 2008.

Earth velocity is 29.8 km/secVenus velocity is 35.1km/secMars velocity is 47.9 km/secDI Herculis is 103.5 km/secIn case of mercury they use 1/2 cycle or use Venus orbit to calculate Mercury because

Mercury is closer to the sun and disappears more than Venus and Venus is a bright planetthat looks like a star.

In the original calculation of 1859 the used 1/2 cycle because of theproximity of Mercury to the SUN

And = - 15x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/centuryWith v = 47.9 km/sec and v* = 29.8

= - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(47.9 - 29.8)/c] arc

sec/century = 43.0 arc second per century

Then they later came and used Venus as reference for measuring andused full cycle because Venus look like a morning star and can be seenbetter

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Mercury - Orbital velocity ofVenus = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 - 35.1/300,000)sec

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (47.9 -35.1/300,000)= 43.0 arc per century for mercury.

Venus is bright like a star and it is used to calculate Mercury's orbit.

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Venus - Orbital velocity ofEarth


46/116

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan (35.1 -29.8/300,000)

= 8.3 arc sec per century for Venus

Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit.

This same formula applies to stars = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

DI HerculisIt all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

V* (p) = [GM/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/secV* (s) = [Gm/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec

With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2 =103.5887398km/secAnd v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398 = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan[(133.39)/300,000]

= 1.3 arc sec/centuryIn the 1/2 period method = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine arc tan [(v - v*)/c] arcsec/century

= 1.3 /2 = 0.65

Go to NASA Website SAO/NASA see how their PHD'S are more like of GED'S and type:Apsidal motion 1985 and pick up the article written by Villanova 5th gradesAnd then type: Apsidal motion 2010 and pick up the article written by the same KinderGardeners Dr Edward Guinan and Frank Maloney

16 - Time delays and the creation of elementary particles

Looting DOE and other USA government institutions is a common place because corporateacademia of western nations will say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobsmoney prestige Nobel Prizes and no physics and because western politician are corporatecorrupt and shallow science educated politicians and will give a bucket of money for a

bucket full of nothing because money is not coming out from their pockets and they have noclue what they are paying except they are told it is good! It is stinking well and they arepaying nothing and nothing is dark energy. To prove dark energy exists for a scientificallyignorant government and looting scientists, scientists took a bucket with a phototuberegistering flashes between two elevations. The difference in count is taken as proof of theexistence of elementary nuclear particles and dark energy. I Joe Nahhas have had accusedwestern scientists of fraud since July 4th, 1973 and this article is part of the proof that at least88.88 % of western physicists published work is fraud and fraud is dark energy.


47/116

Introduction: The elimination of relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter ofscience. The death ofE = mc in inevitable because it was based on visual illusion. VisualIllusions is a characteristic of the nuclear world and they are a result of bad measurements.Measurements are done wrong for past 350 years starting with Newton.

Want to see how E = mc trick? It is shown below but for now read thisTime dilations tricks are scatter experiments. I taught in colleges for few years and I can

explain it and it is called Scatter and not time dilations.

Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays PhysicsT is real time = t is event time + [T - t; real time - event time]

T = t + [T- t]T = TT = t [T/t]T/t = e ; = arc tan (v/c) this is the magic sock equation for lootingT = t e = t [cosine + sine ]T = T (x) + T (y) = t [cosine + sine ]T (x) = = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine (/2) = T (x) - t = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]} = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

With (v/c) = 1/n = 1/1.0003 = n = index of refraction of air = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]} /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.0003)]} /t = - 0.292787177

N = N (0) e /t = - 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e- 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}

N = N (0) e /t = - 0.292787177

N = N (0) e- 0.292787177

In an MIT 1962 video that is sold and distributed around the world two gentlemen had a Bucketwith a photo sensor inside it registering flashes between two elevations at a mountain top andat sea level

The vertical showers of - Meson were counted through a horizontal counter:On a mountain top of 1.943 km height ....... 564 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hourAt sea Level.......................................... 412 flashes caught on screen and counted in one hourThis count is given as experimental proof of the existence of - Mesons and time dilations.

Is this time dilation?Absolutely not!


48/116


49/116

Then N (x) = = N (0) cosine = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)And m (x) = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)

A- N (x) = N (0) cosine arc tan (1/d)N (x) = 564 cosine arc tan (1/1.07)N (x) = 412.089522

B - T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)T (x) = (1.943/300,000) cosine arc tan (1/1.07)T (x) = 2.054368496 x 10-6 sec

C - We should have m = m (0) cosine arc tan (v/c)

If you use T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan (1/1.07) = - 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}And / t = 2 t sine {1/2[arc tan (v/c)]}And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/n)]}And / t = 2 sine {1/2[arc tan (1/1.393)]}And / t = 0.187647931

And m = m (0)e t/ = m (0)e 1/0.187647931And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three

With a made up imaginary particle proof of existence and a made - up measured life timenow mass become an easier made -up. When the mass of - Muon were to be measuredcloud chambers were used using Aerosols and Aerosols have a refractive index of 1.393,from published data and if we take n as 1.393,And m = 206.79 m (e) (1979) data --------------------------- Three

What happened is the amount of diffracted electrons was considered as the mass of a newparticle when it is an average of 206.79 electrons. What I am saying is that the "Atom" iswhite man trash and thanks to: or (564 - 412) x [564/4l2] 206.7917 -15 - Real time Straight lineS = r[(r)+ (r)] tWith (r) = 0Then S = r[ (r)] t = r [cosine t+ sine t]Let r = r = v t Then S = v t [cosine t+ sine t]

S x + S y = v t [cosine t] + v t [ sine t]

Along the line of measurement


50/116

Sx = v tcosine tPerpendicular to the line of measurementS y= v t sine t

At time of measurement w t = arc tan (v/c)Sx = v tcosine arc tan (v/c)

S y= v t sine arc tan (v/c)

If v = cThen Sx = v tcosine arc tan (v/c) = c tcosine arc tan (c/c) = c t cosine (/4) = c t / 2S y= v t sine arc tan (v/c) = c tsine arc tan (c/c) = c t sine (/4) = c t / 2S = c tIf r = r(0)Sx = r(0)cosine arc tan (v/c) = r(0) [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]S y= r(0) sine arc tan (v/c)

If v


51/116


52/116

= - 4 (b/a) (v/c) / T (1 - ) = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ T (1 - ) } (v/c)

24 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects in arc sec/ century.{S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c)

{(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) 25 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet mercury in arc sec/ century.{S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) {(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) With = .206, T = 88; v = v* + v; v* = orbital velocity = 47.9 km/sec v = spin speed ofobserver on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. v = v* + v = 48.2 km/sec; v (mercury) = 3 m/sAnd W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c)

= [-720x36526x3600/88] (1.552) (48.2/300,000) = 43.10 Arc sec /century

26 - Advance of Perihelion visual effects of Planet Venus in arc sec/ century.{S x P/2 (x) - (r '/2)} 2/a (1 - ) } = - 4 {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) {(180/) (36526) (3600)} = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) With = .206, T = 244.7; v = v* + v; v* = orbital velocity = 35.12 km/sec v = spin speedof observer on earth = 0.3km/sec Europe. And v (Mercury) = 6.52km/secv = v* + v = 41.94 km/secAnd W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c)

= [-720x36526x3600/244.7] (1.00761) (41.94/300,000) = 8.17 Arc sec /century

27 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc sec/centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

29 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/ centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36526/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

30 - Binary stars apsidal motion in arc degree/yearW" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

31 - Binary stars apsidal motion delays in arc degree/cycleW" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

32 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per century:W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

33 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /centuryW" (calculated) = [-720x36528/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

34 - Global Positioning Systems in arc second per year:


53/116

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

35 - Global Positioning Systems in arc degree per year:W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

36 - Global Positioning Systems delays in arc degree per cycle:W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

37- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per cycle:W" (calculated) = [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

38- Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per day:W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

39- Global Positioning Systems delays in second per cycle:W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) arc sec/ century

40 - Global Positioning Systems delays in second per day:U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[ (1 - )]/ (1 - ) } (v/c) sec/day

41 - Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/dayU (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) sec/day

42- Application of Global positioning system

GPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period; = 0And v = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed;

And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/secondThen v* +/- v = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/secondWe subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are oppositeGPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc

W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) ]} [(v +/- v*)/c] seconds/dayW" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] seconds of arc /1 dayW" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by24hours/360degress = 15

U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/dayU = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day

43 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays = [16 G M/c] [1 +/- (v/v*)]

44 - Interplanetary telecommunications around the Sun round trip time delays Nahhasconstant


54/116

(0) = 16 G M/c = 247.597 s

45 - Mars telecommunications around the sun time delays Shapiro's historical mistake = [16 G M/c] [1 + (v/v*)] = 250 s

46 - Circular motion Advance of starting point visual effectsW" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] (v/c) arc sec/ century; = 0

47- Time Factor

S x= r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]S x = r [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]If (v/c) = (1/n) = (1/ refractive index) and the velocity is constant in absolute valueOr S x = c (x) and r = c t; then (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (v/c)]Along the line of measurement

(x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]Perpendicular to the line of measurementS y = r sine arc tan (v/c)S y = r sine arc tan (v/c)And (y) = t sine arc tan (v/c) = t sine arc tan (1/n)48 - Reines and Cowans: 1953 Savannah River Neutrino experiment historical mistakeAlong the line of measurement (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]With t = 25 sAnd n of water = 1.33 < n < 1.44 = n of tri ethyl benzene (x) = t [1 - sine arc tan (1/n)]

4.67 s < (x) < 5 sAfter I knew how timing and visual illusion scientists have had created a world ofphysics that does not exist

Relativity theory and quantum mechanics must be wrong1 - Special relativity theory Space time illusion that no one know how?a- Length contractionb - Time dilationsc - Constant velocity of lightd- Momentume - Mass

f- Mass energy

2 - Dark energy that is there but not detected3 - Elementary particles4 - Big bang5- Expanding Universe?Etc.


55/116

What is the Alternative?

Newton's equations solved wrong for 350 years

Abstract: This is the real time solution to the problem of planetary system motion aroundtheir motion sun and the solution to the 350 years advance of perihelion/apsidal motionpuzzle. This is the proof that the motion of planets around their mother sun is an ellipse anda real time "apparent" visual effect advance of perihelion/ apsidal motion.


Real time solution is:Real time orbit: r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+cos)] [(r)+ (r)] t

Real time mass m = m (, 0) [(m)+ (m)] t

"Apparent advance of perihelion"W" (cal) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[ (1-)]/ (1-) } [(v+ v*)/c] arc seconds/100 years

Proof:With (2): d (mr')/d t = 0

Then mr' = constant= H (0, 0)= m (0, 0) h (0, 0); h (0, 0) = r (0, 0) ' (0, 0)= m (0, 0) r (0, 0) '(0, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] [' (, 0)]= [m (, 0)] h (, 0); h (, 0) = [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]

= [m (, 0)] [r (, 0)] ['(, 0)]= [m (, t)] [r (, t)] [' (, t)]= [m (, 0) m (0, t)] [r (, 0) r (0, t)] [' (, t)]= [m (, 0) m (0, t)] [r (, 0) r (0, t)] ['(, 0) ' (0, t)]

With mr' = constantDifferentiate with respect to timeThen 2mm'r' + 2mrr'' + mr" = 0Divide by mr'Then 2 (m'/m) + 2(r'/r) + "/' = 0This equation will have a solution 2 (m'/m) = 2[ (m) + (m)]

And 2(r'/r) = 2[ (r) + (r)]And "/' = -2{ (m) + (r) + [ (m) + (r)]}

Then (m'/m) = [ (m) + (m)]Or d m/m d t = [ (m) + (m)]And dm/m = [ (m) + (m)] d tThen m = m (0) [(m)+ (m)] t


56/116

And m = m (0) m (0, t); m (0, t) = [(m)+ (m)] tWith initial spatial condition that can be taken at t = 0 anywhere then m (0) = m (, 0)And m = m (, 0) m (0, t) = m (, 0) [(m)+ (m)] tAnd m (0, t) = Exp [ (m) + (m)] tSimilarly we can getAlso, r = r (, 0) r (0, t) = r (, 0) [(r)+ (r)] tWith r (0, t) = [(r)+ (r)] t

Then '(, t) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (, 0)r (, 0)]} -2{[(m)+ (m)] +[(m)+ (m)]} t

And '(, t) = ' (, 0)] -2{[(m)+ (m)] +[(m)+ (m)]} tAnd, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t)And ' (0, t) = -2{[(m)+ (m)] +[(m)+ (m)]} tAlso '(, 0) = H (, 0)/ m (, 0) r (, 0)And '(0, 0) = {H (0, 0)/ [m (0, 0)r (0, 0)]}With (1): d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -GmM/r = -GmM/mr

And d (m r)/dt - (m r) ' = -Gm (, 0) m (0, t) M/ (mr)Let m r =1/uThen d (m r)/d t = -u'/u = - (1/u) (') d u/d = (- '/u) d u/d = -H d u/d And d (m r)/dt = -H'du/d = - Hu [du/d]

-Hu

Documents

Harvard's Physics department DR Lisa Randall's Relativity Stupidity on You Tube