13
MAGAZINES o NBM&CW o Lifting & Specialized Transport o MGS Architecture o Indian Infra. & Tenders Week NEWS ARTICLES o Repairs & Rehabilitations o Waterproofing / Const. Chemicals o Concrete o Roads & Pavements o Bridges o Computer Softwares o Formwork & Scaffolding o Flooring o Glass o PEB / ROOFING PEB / Prefab / Steel Structures Tensile Structures Roofing & Cladding o Miscellaneous Plumbing & Sanitaryware Car Parking Others Project Mgmt / Arbitration / Consultant o Architects & Project Watch o Green / Tall Construction o Metro & Tunneling o Case Studies o Precast Construction PRODUCTS o Scaffolding / Formwork o Waterproofing / Repair o Chemicals / Admixtures / Additives o Roofing / Cladding / PEB PEB / Prefab Roofing / Cladding Tensile Fabric Rollforming Machine Fasteners / Accessories o Building Materials Doors & Windows Plumbing & Sanitaryware Iron & Steel Geo Synthetic / Geo hazard Solution Plywood

Hangar

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ssss

Citation preview

  • MAGAZINES

    o NBM&CW

    o Lifting & Specialized Transport

    o MGS Architecture

    o Indian Infra. & Tenders Week

    NEWS

    ARTICLES

    o Repairs & Rehabilitations

    o Waterproofing / Const. Chemicals

    o Concrete

    o Roads & Pavements

    o Bridges

    o Computer Softwares

    o Formwork & Scaffolding

    o Flooring

    o Glass

    o PEB / ROOFING

    PEB / Prefab / Steel Structures

    Tensile Structures

    Roofing & Cladding

    o Miscellaneous

    Plumbing & Sanitaryware

    Car Parking

    Others

    Project Mgmt / Arbitration / Consultant

    o Architects & Project Watch

    o Green / Tall Construction

    o Metro & Tunneling

    o Case Studies

    o Precast Construction

    PRODUCTS

    o Scaffolding / Formwork

    o Waterproofing / Repair

    o Chemicals / Admixtures / Additives

    o Roofing / Cladding / PEB

    PEB / Prefab

    Roofing / Cladding

    Tensile Fabric

    Rollforming Machine

    Fasteners / Accessories

    o Building Materials

    Doors & Windows

    Plumbing & Sanitaryware

    Iron & Steel

    Geo Synthetic / Geo hazard Solution

    Plywood

  • Glass Fitting / materials

    Floorings

    Lighting

    Insulation

    Others

    o Computer Softwares

    o Car Parking

    o Kitchen

    o Paints

    o Miscellaneous

    o Elevators / Escalators

    EQUIPMENTS

    o Earthmoving

    o Road Construction

    o Concrete

    o Cranes / Material Handling

    o Crushing & Mining

    o Tipper Truck / Hauler / Dumper

    o Foundation / Piling Rigs / Drilling / Breakers

    o Surveying & Testing

    o Brick / Paver Plant & Prescast

    o Rental / Special Transport

    o Equipment Finance

    o Spare Parts / Engines / Lubricants

    o Other Equipment

    REPORTS

    o Construction / Infra Industry

    o Equipment / Machinery

    o Event Report

    o Project / Site Report

    o Production Facility / Warehouses

    INTERVIEWS

    SUBSCRIPTION

    PEOPLE WATCH

    EVENTS

  • View Online

    Download Latest Issue

    Previous Issues

  • View Online

    Download Latest Issue

    Previous Issues

    View Online

    Download Latest Issue

    Previous Issues

  • View Online

    Download Latest Issue

    Previous Issues

    Print

    Email

    Design of Long Span Steel Structures and Hangars [With Eave Bracing Concept]

    Amit Bharana, President, ERA BUILDSYS Ltd.

    The majority of industrial buildings are made out of steel for obvious reasons of high

  • strength/weight ratio. A study, on the Efficient Design of Large span hangars/structures, ensuring

    lighter foundations is presented.

    Introduction

    Amit Bharana

    Structure with Span larger than 40 m can be regarded as long span structures and need to be

    carefully designed keeping a balance of all the aspects like its weight, deflections (sway) and

    foundation forces. There are many combinations of designing large spans, like conventional truss

    & RCC column combination, truss & steel columns, Pre-engineered building (PEB) etc.

    These days with the concept of PEB, the major advantage we get is the use of high strength steel

    plates (usually Fe 350), lighter but high strength cold form purlins, and 550 Mpa Galvalume

    profiled sheets. The use of PEB not only reduces the weight of the structure because high tensile

    steel grades are used but also ensures quality control of the structure. In the following study, we

    have designed a hangar using this modern concept of PEB.

    Design Philosphy

    The design under discussion is a 42 meter clear span hangar for aircrafts maintenance. We have

    designed this Hangar in 3D on STAAD software, for proper simulation of the load distribution

    uniformly in three co-ordinates system i.e. X, Y and Z. All the Basic loads i.e. Dead, Live, Wind,

    Temperature, seismic etc have been taken into consideration for designing of the frames. The

    structure has been designed under enclosed as well as open condition for application of wind

    loads, because of the opening & closing of the large sized Hangar Door.

    The basic philosophy of rigid frame design is by adopting FIXED or PINNED column base conditions. A fixed column base is always a sturdy frame and helps in controlling allowable

    deflection (side sway) in the frames. Steel designers always prefer fixed base to pinned base

    frames. On the contrary, for foundation designers the design of foundations becomes a nightmare

    particularly in large span buildings. In fixed base design, the frame is rigid, but transfers heavy

    moments to the foundations. On weak soil, designing foundations becomes tedious task.

    Likewise for pinned support, the frame does not transfer any moment to the foundation and only

    vertical & horizontal reactions affect the design of foundation. It looks simple but in case of

    large spans, controlling deflections of frame in pinned base condition is a challenging task.

    To control this deflection, the simplest way is to increase the Geometrical properties/sectional

    sizes of frame, but it is not advisable as it adds to the tonnage of the whole building, adding not

    only to the seismic forces but also adding to the cost subsequently. We need a solution wherein

  • the sway of the frame can be controlled and the section sizes are also not increased.

    The best way we could find is to BRACE the frame to control the excess deflection. In the present case we have provided bracing at eave level (braced eave) on both sides of the structure

    along the length for this purpose. Span of this Eave bracing is taken approximately L / 10 of each

    side. We can observe in the following example that eave bracing is of a great help in controlling

    Horizontal deflections and leading to lighter foundation design.

    Example

    To conclude above, as example hangar has done with following parameters having both side

    hangar doors with following details:

    Span = 42 m

    Length = 76 m

    Bay Spacing = 7.6 m

    Clear Ht. = 10 m

    Wind Speed = 50 m/s

    Roof Slope = 1 in 10

    Alternate 1 (Fixed Base Design)

  • In fixed base, due of uniform moment distribution at base as well as eave, the straight column of

    section size Web = 1275 X 8 mm and Flange = 375 X 16 mm have been used. By using these

    dimensions of frame, the deflection is allowed in control. Please refer Table 1.

  • As regards foundation forces, the moment (Mz) is approximately 165 MT and vertical force (Fy)

    is 41 MT at the base of the column, which is being transferred to foundation. Please refer forces

    generated at base of frame in Table 2.

    For above forces a tentative size of Isolated foundation is worked out as under -

  • Eccentricity (e)

    e = (Mz/Vy) = (165 / 41) = 4.03

    The length of the pedestrian (L/6) should be greater than eccentricity (e).

    i.e. L/6 > e

    L > 6e

    L > 6 X 4.03 = 24.18 m 25 m (At Single Side)

    Thus, it may be observed that the open foundation for this type of frame will be highly

    impractical & uneconomical and only solution is to provide pile foundation, which will again be

    time consuming & expansive.

    Alternative 2 (Pinned Base design)

    As second option, the same structure has designed with Pinned Base condition, now we can have

  • tapered columns where moment (Mz) at the base will be ZERO. Only lateral (Fx) and vertical

    (Fy) forces will be acting. Please refer forces generated at base of frame in Table 3.

    Due to zero moment we could design very light foundation (Sub-structure) for the same

    structure.

    It may be observed that the foundation forces are very limited and a small isolated foundation

    can be design for the columns.

    But at the same time, in pinned base, the deflections of the Portals in lateral as well as

    longitudinal direction will become critical parameter. And in case no special provision is made to

    control this deflection, the frame will have a considerable sway. Therefore for control of

    deflection, the provision of Eave Bracing (braced eave as highlighted) longitudinally on both

    sides of the structure has been made.

  • Span of this Eave bracing should be approximately span / 10 of each side. For 42 m span the

    width of eave bracing used 42/10 m = 4.2 m 4 m at each side (see below 3 D model)

    For comparison between the same sizes of frames with & without using the eave bracing, the

    deflection resulted in the framed are given in Table 4 and 5.

  • As per codal provisions, deflection allowed in columns is (H/150) that is 66 mm. In case of

    braced eave structure, deflection value was under control with 60 mm in longitudinal direction,

    however at the same time, the value was much more than allowable deflection in case the eave

    bracing is not provided i.e. 7566 mm which is very high.

    Thus Eave Bbracing Concept is very beneficial in large span structures with pinned base concept

    and since no moment is transferred to base level, the design of foundation is also very

    economical.

    NBMCW January 201