3
The Great Deadener by Estella Aviles In the plays Hamlet and Waiting for Godot, the protagonists are each given a task to complete by an authority figure: Vladimir and Estragon must wait for Godot day after day, and Hamlet must find it in himself to revenge his father’s murder by taking his uncle’s life. Though these tasks differ greatly in nature, they share a certain nearimpossible quality, which may lead one to question why one task (Vladimir and Estragon’s) is achieved while the other (Hamlet’s) is left undone. The main reason for this is habit: specifically, that the former task can be completed without sacrificing habit, while the latter can not. To reach the point where we can definitively say this, however, we must step back and examine the tasks of these plays more closely, as well as the nature of the conflicts that arise from them. In Waiting for Godot, action is virtually nonexistent, and the whole of the play centers around the conflict of interest Vladimir and Estragon face because of this. They are called to stay and wait for Godot, to refrain from action and remain dutifully at attention, ready for the moment when Godot finally comes. They do so in the hope that Godot will provide them with a better life. Godot is said to own a large estate and keep many servants, and the two vagabonds believe they may find a place there. Though reduced to pitiful circumstances, they do not leave and search for another potential master, but return day after day to wait for Godot to come. By contrast, Hamlet’s conflict stems from a command to act. In this situation, the ghost of Hamlet’s father plays the same role to Hamlet that Godot plays to Vladimir and Estragon. The spirit is the only authority Hamlet seems to feel any obligation to, and Hamlet is tied to him with the same lifealtering strength that ties Vladimir and Estragon to Godot. Just as the latter two center their every day around Godot’s request that they wait, so too Hamlet centers his every day around his dead father’s wishes. Unlike Vladimir and Estragon, however, Hamlet finds himself unable to do as his Godotfigure commands. This leads us to the question of why of what is so different in these two situations. The obvious answer to this question is that Godot has asked Vladimir and Estragon to do something easy and Hamlet Sr. has asked Hamlet to do something hard. It can hardly be argued that coming to a particular place and waiting for someone else to show up is more difficult than taking the life of another human being. This answer, however, is flawed in that it underestimates the significance of Godot’s request to Vladimir and Estragon. I will not speculate as to which of the two tasks are more difficult, but I will argue that neither is easily done. The heart of the difficulty of Vladimir and Estragon’s task lies in the fact that it never ends. Godot is never going to come. And yet they must continue, for the rest of their lives, to come to the same place each day and wait for something that will never come to pass. Their lives become an eternal, meaningless cycle, and though they may become dissatisfied with this situation (as they express throughout the play), they have no escape from it other than death. While of a very different nature than Hamlet’s mission, this is undeniably a significant commitment. Having established that Hamlet Sr.’s call to action and Godot’s call to inaction are both incredibly difficult commands, we may readdress the question of why Godot’s instruction is possible for Vladimir and Estragon to carry out, while that of Hamlet Sr. is not possible for Hamlet to carry out. To do this, we can look at the characters’ own reasoning for their actions.

hamlet godot comparison

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

an analysis of text

Citation preview

  • TheGreatDeadenerbyEstellaAviles

    IntheplaysHamletandWaitingforGodot,theprotagonistsareeachgivenatasktocompletebyanauthority

    figure:VladimirandEstragonmustwaitforGodotdayafterday,andHamletmustfinditinhimselftorevengehis

    fathersmurderbytakinghisuncleslife.Thoughthesetasksdiffergreatlyinnature,theyshareacertain

    nearimpossiblequality,whichmayleadonetoquestionwhyonetask(VladimirandEstragons)isachievedwhilethe

    other(Hamlets)isleftundone.Themainreasonforthisishabit:specifically,thattheformertaskcanbecompleted

    withoutsacrificinghabit,whilethelattercannot.Toreachthepointwherewecandefinitivelysaythis,however,we

    muststepbackandexaminethetasksoftheseplaysmoreclosely,aswellasthenatureoftheconflictsthatarisefrom

    them.

    InWaitingforGodot,actionisvirtuallynonexistent,andthewholeoftheplaycentersaroundthe

    conflictofinterestVladimirandEstragonfacebecauseofthis.TheyarecalledtostayandwaitforGodot,torefrain

    fromactionandremaindutifullyatattention,readyforthemomentwhenGodotfinallycomes.Theydosointhehope

    thatGodotwillprovidethemwithabetterlife.Godotissaidtoownalargeestateandkeepmanyservants,andthetwo

    vagabondsbelievetheymayfindaplacethere.Thoughreducedtopitifulcircumstances,theydonotleaveandsearch

    foranotherpotentialmaster,butreturndayafterdaytowaitforGodottocome.

    Bycontrast,Hamletsconflictstemsfromacommandtoact.Inthissituation,theghostofHamlets

    fatherplaysthesameroletoHamletthatGodotplaystoVladimirandEstragon.ThespiritistheonlyauthorityHamlet

    seemstofeelanyobligationto,andHamletistiedtohimwiththesamelifealteringstrengththattiesVladimirand

    EstragontoGodot.JustasthelattertwocentertheireverydayaroundGodotsrequestthattheywait,sotooHamlet

    centershiseverydayaroundhisdeadfatherswishes.UnlikeVladimirandEstragon,however,Hamletfindshimself

    unabletodoashisGodotfigurecommands.Thisleadsustothequestionofwhyofwhatissodifferentinthesetwo

    situations.

    TheobviousanswertothisquestionisthatGodothasaskedVladimirandEstragontodosomething

    easyandHamletSr.hasaskedHamlettodosomethinghard.Itcanhardlybearguedthatcomingtoaparticularplace

    andwaitingforsomeoneelsetoshowupismoredifficultthantakingthelifeofanotherhumanbeing.Thisanswer,

    however,isflawedinthatitunderestimatesthesignificanceofGodotsrequesttoVladimirandEstragon.Iwillnot

    speculateastowhichofthetwotasksaremoredifficult,butIwillarguethatneitheriseasilydone.Theheartofthe

    difficultyofVladimirandEstragonstaskliesinthefactthatitneverends.Godotisnevergoingtocome.Andyetthey

    mustcontinue,fortherestoftheirlives,tocometothesameplaceeachdayandwaitforsomethingthatwillnever

    cometopass.Theirlivesbecomeaneternal,meaninglesscycle,andthoughtheymaybecomedissatisfiedwiththis

    situation(astheyexpressthroughouttheplay),theyhavenoescapefromitotherthandeath.Whileofaverydifferent

    naturethanHamletsmission,thisisundeniablyasignificantcommitment.

    HavingestablishedthatHamletSr.scalltoactionandGodotscalltoinactionarebothincredibly

    difficultcommands,wemayreaddressthequestionofwhyGodotsinstructionispossibleforVladimirandEstragonto

    carryout,whilethatofHamletSr.isnotpossibleforHamlettocarryout.Todothis,wecanlookatthecharacters

    ownreasoningfortheiractions.

  • ThemainforcesdrivingVladimirandEstragonseemtobehope,habit,andfear.Vladimirmentions

    allthesemotivationsatdifferentpointsoftheplay,beginningwithhopeintheplaysfirstscene,demonstratedbyhis

    linesWhatsthegoodoflosingheartnow,thatswhatIsayandOneofthethieveswassaved.Itsareasonable

    percentage(Beckett,ActI).Hekeepsthisoptimismforanimpressivelylongtime,asfarastheendofActI,wherehe

    says,Tomorroweverythingwillbebetter(Beckett,ActI).Heeventuallylosesthishopeandfallsbackonhabitinthe

    secondact,statingthathabitisagreatdeadenerandcontinuingwithhisusualinteractionswithEstragonandGodots

    dailymessenger(who,asusual,instructsthementocomebacktomorrow)withresignation(Beckett,ActII).Finally,

    heendswithfearinthelastscene,replyingtoEstragonsquestionofwhatwouldhappeniftheystoppedwaitingon

    Godotwiththestatementhedpunishus(Beckett,ActII).Thiscombinationofmotivatorsleavesthemliterally

    unabletoactagainstGodot.Inthefinallineoftheplaytheyresolvetoleaveandthecurtainfallsastheystand

    immobile(Beckett,ActII).

    However,ifthesereasonsareenoughtoforceobedience,surelyHamletwouldhavebeenableto

    obeyhisownfathersorder.Thereisnolackofmotivationonhisparttodoso:hecertainlyhasfear,statingthathis

    deadfathersappearancehorridlyshake[shis]disposition(Shakespeare,ActI,SceneIV),andhehasakindofhope

    thathisfathersspiritwillresteasierafterClaudiusisdead,asthereisnootherreasonfortheghosttomakethe

    request.Whatshouldbeevenmoremotivatingistheobviouslovehehad,andstillhas,forhisfather,asevidencedin

    hisdescriptionofhisfatherintheclosetsceneashavingagraceseatedon[his]browaformindeed,whereevery

    goddidseemtosethisseal,togivetheworldassuranceofaman(Shakespeare,ActIII,SceneIV).Yetsomehow,

    despitethesemanyandpowerfuldrivingforces,Hamletisunabletocarryouthisfathersorders.Somethingabouthis

    situationisdifferentfromthatofVladimirandEstragon,whoareunabletodoanythingbutfollowtheirorder.

    AnotabledifferencethatmayshedsomelightonthisisthatunlikeVladimirandEstragon,Hamlet

    doesnothavehabitonhisside.Tocarryouthisfathersorders,Hamletmustbreakthepatternofhislifeinadramatic

    way,andconsideringhislifeuptothispoint,itishardlysurprisinghefindsthisimpossibletodo.Hamletisyoung,a

    prince,andusedtoacomfortablelifestyle.Heisascholar,notawarriorlikehisfather,andisevenreferredtoassuch

    byOpheliainthenunneryscene(Shakespeare,ActIII,SceneI).Committingmurderwillinevitablyendthislifestyle,

    andnomatterhowstronglyhewishesforjustice,hecannotbringhimselftogivethis,hishabit,up.Whilehis

    performanceofmadnesscertainlychallengesthisthought,consideringthewayitchangeshisrelationshipswiththose

    aroundhim,HamletsliferemainsfarmorestablethiswaythanwerehetokillthekingofDenmark.

    Furthermore,Hamletcannotbuildupahabitinthewayhiscounterpartsdo.ForVladimirand

    Estragon,Godotscommandwaslikelyasmallsacrificeinitially,simplywaitingforoneday.Whentheseconddayof

    waitingcame,itiseasytoseehowtheywouldconvincethemselveshewouldcome,thistime.Thispatterncouldthen

    continuewiththesubsequentdaysfallingslowlyintoapatternuntilwaitingseamlesslybecamehabit.Hamlethasno

    suchtransitionavailabletohim:hemustmakeadecisivemovethatwilldrasticallychangehislife.IfVladimirand

    Estragonareunabletoactagainsttheirauthorityfigure,Hamletisunabletoactinaccordancewithhis.Habit,then,

    wouldseemtobethetruedeterminingfactorbehindthecharactersability(orinability)tofulfillthetasksgivento

    them

  • Evenmoretellingisthecharactersdesiretoactoutofhabit.VladimirandEstragonoftenfantasize

    aboutwhattheirliveswerelikepriortothedaytheybeganwaitingforGodot,aswellaswhatitwouldbeliketocease

    waitingforhim.Aspreviouslymentioned,theyevenresolvetogoaway.Hamlet,meanwhile,istormentedimmensely

    byhisdesiretobringjusticetoClaudius.Hetalksfrequentlyofhisdesiretoact,andofhisdisgustwithhimselffor

    delaying.Yetinbothcases,itisnotthecharactersdesiresthatwinthebattle,noreventheirfearofpunishmentfrom

    theonewhohascommandedthem.Instead,itishabit.

    Theimportanceofhabitraisesmanyquestionsaboutbothoftheseplays.HadHamletbeenmoreinthehabitofkillingforinstance,hadhebeenasoldierfreshfrombattleattheplaysbeginningwouldhehavebeenabletoavengehisfathersdeath?IfHamletwerealreadyacriminal,andnotusedtoacomfortableoreasylifestyle,wouldhehavebeenabletokillClaudius?IfGodotweretofinallyappeartoVladimirandEstragon,wouldtheywelcomeorfearhim,giventhegreatdisruptionthiswouldbringtotheirdailyhabit?Whilesuchspeculationisbeyondthescopeofthispaper,thesequestionsareworthmentioning.HabitisnotoftenemphasizedindiscussionsofHamletinparticular,andsoopensupaslewoffascinatingquestionsfordiscussion.