Upload
lekhuong
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DRAFT ZONING CHANGES to implement Mandatory
Housing Affordability (MHA) Admiral
åå
åå
åå
¿
¿
¿
¿¿
¿ ¿¿¿ ¿¿¿
¿¿¿¿ ¿ ¿¿ ¿¿ ¿
¿¿
¿
¿
¿
¿¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
¿
45TH
AVE
SW
46TH
AVE
SW
47TH
AVE
SW
39TH
AVE
SW
WS E
VA
HT83
48TH
AVE
SW
WS E
VA
HT63
WA
LNU
T AV
E SW
WS E
VA
HT44
SW HILL ST
42N
D A
VE S
W
WS E
VA
ER
EDI
VLE
B
SW LANDER ST
ALKI TRAIL
SW WALKER ST
SW HINDS ST
WS E
VA
HT73
SUNSET AVE SW
SW SPOKANE ST
FERR
Y AV
E SW
SW COLLEGE ST
WS E
VA
TS14
WS E
VA
HT
04
SW SEATTLE ST
PALM
AVE
SW
SW HOLGATE ST
SW OLGA ST
SW MASSACHUSETTS ST
BONAIR DR SW
SW WAITE ST
49TH
AVE
SW
50TH
AVE
SW
SW HANFORD ST
SW GRAYSON ST
VICTORIA AVE SW
SW STEVENS ST
PRESCOTT AVE SW
WS E
VA
HC
RA
SW FOREST ST
SW PRINCE ST
BRO
OK
AVE
SW
SW SUMNER WAY
SW STEVENS ST
SW HILL ST
SW HINDS ST
WS E
VA
HT73
SW HOLGATE ST
BELV
IDER
E AV
E SW
48TH
AVE
SW
SW COLLEGE ST
42N
D A
VE S
W
50TH
AVE
SW
50TH
AVE
SW
WS E
VA
DN24
49TH
AVE
SW
44TH
AVE
SW
WA
LNU
T AV
E SW
41ST
AVE
SW
48TH
AVE
SW
SW LANDER ST
ALKI T
RAIL
49TH
AVE
SW
SW WALKER ST
47TH
AVE
SW
50TH
AVE
SW
CALI
FORN
IA A
VE S
W
SW ADMIRAL WAY
49TH
AVE
SW
SW HANFORD ST
HARBOR AVE SW
WS E
VA
HT73
HIAWATHA PLAYFIELD
SEACREST PARK
DUWAMISH HEAD GREENBELT
FAIRMOUNT PARK
HAMILTON VIEWPOINT
PARK
BELVEDERE PARK
CALIFO
RNIA
PLACE
COLLEGE
STREET RAVINE
Madison
Lafayette
West SeattleHigh School
LR3
| LR
3 (M
)
NC2-65 | NC2-75 (M)
NC
2P-4
0 | N
C2P
-55
(M)
LR1 | LR1 (M)
NC
2-40
| N
C2-
55 (M
)
MR | MR (M
)
LR3 |
LR3 (
M)
Sing
le F
amily
|R
esid
entia
l Sm
all L
ot (M
)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
3 (M
2)
NC3-65 | NC3-75 (M)
LR3 | LR3 (M)
NC
3P-4
0 | N
C3P
-55
(M)
LR3 | LR3 (M)
LR3
RC
| LR
3 R
C (M
)
LR2 RC | LR2 RC (M)
LR2 | LR2 (M)
LR3
| LR
3 (M
)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
1 (M
1)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
2 (M
1)
LR2
| LR
3 (M
1)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
1 (M
1)
Sing
le F
amily
| N
C2-
40 (M
1)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
1 (M
1)
LR2
| LR
2 (M
)
LR1
| LR
1 (M
)
Sing
le F
amily
| LR
1 (M
1)
NC
2P-3
0 |
NC
2P-4
0 (M
)Si
ngle
Fam
ily |
LR1
(M1)
NC
2P-4
0 | N
C2P
-55
(M)
Residential Urban Village
Solid areas have a typical increase in zoning (usually one story)
Hatched areas have a larger increase in zoning or a change in zone type.
Residential Small Lot (RSL)cottages, townhouses, duplexes/triplexes similar in scale to single family zones
Seattle Mixed (SM)buildings with a mix of
Lowrise (LR)
proposed zoningwhite labels identify changes:
MHA requirementsvary based on scale of zoning change(residential proposal shown)
zone categoriesfollow the links below to see examples of how buildings could look under MHA
urban villagesareas designated for growth in our Comprehensive Plan
Existing boundary
Seattle 2035 10-minute walkshed
Proposed boundary
Open space
å Public school
Light rail
Bus stop
!Á
October 19, 2016
Midrise (MR)apartments with 7-8 stories
Lowrise 3 (LR3) max height 50 ft.
Lowrise 1 (LR1) max height 30 ft.Lowrise 2 (LR2) max height 40 ft.
townhouses, rowhouses, or apartments
Highrise (HR)apartments with heights of 240-300 ft.
Industrial Commercial (IC)MHA applies only to commercial uses
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)mixed-use buildings with 4-9 stories
Commercial (C)auto-oriented commercial buildings
seattle.gov/HALAInteractive web map
existing zone | draft MHA zone
HALA.Consider.it
(M) 6% of homes must be affordable or a payment of $13.25 per sq. ft
(M1) 9% of homes must be affordable or a payment of $20.00 per sq. ft
(M2) 10% of homes must be affordable or a payment of $22.25 per sq. ft
Admiral
This is a harsh transition to adjacent SF neighborhoods.
No parking zone for school bus access is needed.
Some thought that the UV boundary could be expanded here,
to provide more transition.
Concerns about how to bu�er adjacent neighborhoods from
redevelopment along CA.
Consider stepping down the heights of buildings next to the
playground.
Protect view corridor
Zone LR3 to take advantage of school play ground
Higher density
Valuable open space
Proposed heights are okay here
Crosswalks and through-block connections across California Ave are needed, due to long blocks. Also, better sidewalks are needed in this area.
DISCUSSED AT MULTIPLE TABLES:Upzoning along California makes sense, though there is some concern about the height increase.
Need better transition around LR3/SF edgesSenior housing feels
disconnectedSome felt 55’ is an appropriate height here. Others wanted to keep NC-40 and preserve small businesses.
Upzone for more a�ordability.
Tra�c bottleneck concerns.
Some wanted to Rezone this to RSL if California height limit is reduced, but others disagreed. Another table thought LR2 could work here.
DISCUSSED AT MULTIPLE TABLES:Expand UV boundary here
Concerns that California is becoming a cavern, even under existing zoning. Some requested lower heights.
Some felt this is too big a jump in scale. Lower to LR1 or RSL.
School
Park
ADMIRAL URBAN VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD WORKSHOPFebruary 11, 2017
FEEDBACK ON PROPOSED URBAN VILLAGE ZONING CHANGES*
Zone change opportunity noted at discussion
Existing feature noted at discussion
Potential adjustment to the Urban Village boundary
Additional Commercial Areas(Future Opportunity)
Zone Change Feedback
Boundary Adjustments / Other Feedback
Key Neighborhood Assets
Opportunities or concerns expressed at discussion
* Please also see table discussion notes and summaries.