1
218 recognise that no really satistactory method exists for pinpointing in animals the factors that predispose to death from coronary artery disease in man. The section of the guidelines concerned with the use of additives is more dubious. The committee proposes to draw up a permitted list of additives based on long- term surveys of pipe smokers, on the experience in other countries with additives in cigarettes, and on toxicity tests. There will also be a prohibited list. The committee is taking on a colossal task, particularly with the volatile flavouring agents which often consist of mixtures of large numbers of constituents each present in trace amounts. Is the committee aware, too, that chemicals such as plasticisers may get into smoke as a result of the way cigarette filters are made ? Since it has no statutory authority, the Hunter Committee recommends the Secretary of State to obtain assurances from any company proposing to market, in the United Kingdom, a product containing a tobacco substitute that it will abide by the guidelines. It is to be hoped that this proposed voluntary system will work efficiently and be seen to do so. At present, for those who cannot or are unwilling to quit the cigarette habit, the progressive introduction of substi- tutes which produce little tar and tar which is claimed to be less carcinogenic for mouse skin than tobacco tar 10,11 offers the best prospect for the future. But somewhere along the line of increasing the proportion of substitute in the substitute-tobacco blend it will be necessary to add flavours and possibly nicotine for the product to be acceptable. A cautious start has been made to making this possible. HAIR DYES AND CANCER IN carcinogenicity experiments laboratory animals are customarily fed, injected, or painted with the chemical under test and then observed for the rest of their lifespan for any increase in tumour incidence compared with controls. Such experiments are lengthy and highly expensive, and can cope with only small numbers of chemicals. The possibility that many cancers in man may be due to synthetic chemicals introduced into the environment has highlighted the need for much more rapid and inexpensive test sys- tems. One of the most promising new tests measures the ability of chemicals to induce revertant mutation in, for example, histidine-requiring bacterial mutants. Tests of this sort can give results in a matter of days and can be used to screen large numbers of com- pounds. Their validity depends on the assumption that most carcinogens are also mutagens. Already in tests. using known carcinogens and harmless analogues a very high correlation has been found between muta- genicity and carcinogenicity. 12 This finding is suppor- ted by fundamental investigations on the mechanism of action of many carcinogens which show that all are electrophilic reactants or can be converted by meta- bolism into such agents. - These reactive chemicals can interact extensively with D.N.A., which may be the target site for both carcinogenic and mutagenic 10. Hall, R. A., Furlong, R. A. Chemical Engineering, Nov. 11, 1974, p. 90. 11. Farley, C. General Practitioner, Sept. 13, 1974, p. 18. 12. Ames, B. N., Durston, W. E., Yamasaki, E., Lee, F. D. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 1973, 70, 2281. effects and so account for the close correlation between the two properties. Work carried out independently in the United States and England 13,14 using the bacterial mutant system (together with mammalian microsomes to convert pro-drugs to their active form) has shown that the great majority of semipermanent hair dyes are muta- genic in their own right or can be converted to muta- gens by liver microsomes. Thus these agents, which are known to be absorbed through the skin, must be regarded as potential carcinogens in man. This is a controversial observation, since earlier tests using dogs and rodents have not implicated hair dyes as carcinogens, although there is some preliminary epidemiological evidence of a higher incidence of lung cancer in beauticians. On p. 226 Dr Searle and his colleagues say that their carcinogenicity tests in mice " could indicate some activity ". These observations are a far cry from the reported statement that hair dyes may carry the same high risk as cigarette smoking. This is speculation, but the convincing evidence associating bacterial mutagenicity with carcinogenicity cannot be discounted. Obviously there is urgent need for a thorough re-evaluation of the toxicology and carcinogenicity of hair-colourant constituents using all available methods. Among other things, this controversy may establish, once and for all, whether the bacterial system is a reliable screening method for potential carcinogens. DISINFECTANTS AGAINST SQUALOR SQUALID conditions may necessitate squalid measures. Although it is convenient and safe to deal with urinals either by using disposables or by employing an efficient washer/steriliser, these metbods are often judged to be too expensive. Thus, all too often, the routine is soaking in tanks or baths of disinfectant. Where this potentially, dangerous procedure must be used, it is clearly important to use the right disinfectant in the right way. Some years ago Christie 15 described a system using a clear soluble phenolic fluid, with regular topping up between changes, which stood up to microbiological testing. Now Dr Emmerson and Mrs Franks (p. 232) report another trial of the same method (using a less expensive product) which was well controlled both microbiologically and by chemical analysis. It is unfortunate that such practices are still in use in Britain; but, while they are, it is important that disinfectants should be correctly chosen, purchased, and used. Although much has been written about the use of disinfectants, there has been too long a delay in offering official advice about the selection and purchase of specific products. There are indications, however, that such advice may before long be made available to those who need it. This, if heeded, will avoid confusion, ensure the use of effective disinfectants, and spare readers of medical journals the chore of reading too many articles on this subject. 13. Searle, C. E., Harnden, D. G., Venitt, S., Gyde, O. H. B. Nature, 1975, 255, 506. 14. Ames, B. N., Kammen, H. O., Yamasaki, E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2433. 15. Christie, D. R. Lancet, 1967, i, 112.

HAIR DYES AND CANCER

  • Upload
    voliem

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: HAIR DYES AND CANCER

218

recognise that no really satistactory method exists

for pinpointing in animals the factors that predisposeto death from coronary artery disease in man. Thesection of the guidelines concerned with the use ofadditives is more dubious. The committee proposesto draw up a permitted list of additives based on long-term surveys of pipe smokers, on the experience inother countries with additives in cigarettes, and ontoxicity tests. There will also be a prohibited list. Thecommittee is taking on a colossal task, particularly withthe volatile flavouring agents which often consist ofmixtures of large numbers of constituents each presentin trace amounts. Is the committee aware, too, thatchemicals such as plasticisers may get into smoke as aresult of the way cigarette filters are made ?

Since it has no statutory authority, the HunterCommittee recommends the Secretary of State to

obtain assurances from any company proposing tomarket, in the United Kingdom, a product containinga tobacco substitute that it will abide by the guidelines.It is to be hoped that this proposed voluntary systemwill work efficiently and be seen to do so. At present,for those who cannot or are unwilling to quit thecigarette habit, the progressive introduction of substi-tutes which produce little tar and tar which is claimedto be less carcinogenic for mouse skin than tobaccotar 10,11 offers the best prospect for the future. Butsomewhere along the line of increasing the proportionof substitute in the substitute-tobacco blend it will be

necessary to add flavours and possibly nicotine for theproduct to be acceptable. A cautious start has beenmade to making this possible.

HAIR DYES AND CANCER

IN carcinogenicity experiments laboratory animalsare customarily fed, injected, or painted with thechemical under test and then observed for the rest oftheir lifespan for any increase in tumour incidencecompared with controls. Such experiments are lengthyand highly expensive, and can cope with only smallnumbers of chemicals. The possibility that manycancers in man may be due to synthetic chemicalsintroduced into the environment has highlighted theneed for much more rapid and inexpensive test sys-tems. One of the most promising new tests measuresthe ability of chemicals to induce revertant mutation in,for example, histidine-requiring bacterial mutants.

Tests of this sort can give results in a matter of daysand can be used to screen large numbers of com-pounds. Their validity depends on the assumptionthat most carcinogens are also mutagens. Already intests. using known carcinogens and harmless analoguesa very high correlation has been found between muta-genicity and carcinogenicity. 12 This finding is suppor-ted by fundamental investigations on the mechanismof action of many carcinogens which show that all areelectrophilic reactants or can be converted by meta-bolism into such agents. - These reactive chemicals caninteract extensively with D.N.A., which may be thetarget site for both carcinogenic and mutagenic10. Hall, R. A., Furlong, R. A. Chemical Engineering, Nov. 11,

1974, p. 90.11. Farley, C. General Practitioner, Sept. 13, 1974, p. 18.12. Ames, B. N., Durston, W. E., Yamasaki, E., Lee, F. D. Proc. natn.

Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 1973, 70, 2281.

effects and so account for the close correlation betweenthe two properties.Work carried out independently in the United States

and England 13,14 using the bacterial mutant system(together with mammalian microsomes to convert

pro-drugs to their active form) has shown that thegreat majority of semipermanent hair dyes are muta-genic in their own right or can be converted to muta-gens by liver microsomes. Thus these agents, whichare known to be absorbed through the skin, must beregarded as potential carcinogens in man. This is acontroversial observation, since earlier tests usingdogs and rodents have not implicated hair dyes as

carcinogens, although there is some preliminaryepidemiological evidence of a higher incidence of lungcancer in beauticians. On p. 226 Dr Searle and hiscolleagues say that their carcinogenicity tests in mice" could indicate some activity ". These observationsare a far cry from the reported statement that hairdyes may carry the same high risk as cigarette smoking.This is speculation, but the convincing evidenceassociating bacterial mutagenicity with carcinogenicitycannot be discounted. Obviously there is urgent needfor a thorough re-evaluation of the toxicology andcarcinogenicity of hair-colourant constituents usingall available methods. Among other things, this

controversy may establish, once and for all, whetherthe bacterial system is a reliable screening method forpotential carcinogens.

DISINFECTANTS AGAINST SQUALOR

SQUALID conditions may necessitate squalid measures.Although it is convenient and safe to deal with urinalseither by using disposables or by employing an

efficient washer/steriliser, these metbods are often

judged to be too expensive. Thus, all too often, theroutine is soaking in tanks or baths of disinfectant.Where this potentially, dangerous procedure must beused, it is clearly important to use the right disinfectantin the right way. Some years ago Christie 15 describeda system using a clear soluble phenolic fluid, withregular topping up between changes, which stood upto microbiological testing. Now Dr Emmerson andMrs Franks (p. 232) report another trial of the samemethod (using a less expensive product) which waswell controlled both microbiologically and by chemicalanalysis.

It is unfortunate that such practices are still in usein Britain; but, while they are, it is important thatdisinfectants should be correctly chosen, purchased,and used. Although much has been written about theuse of disinfectants, there has been too long a delay inoffering official advice about the selection and purchaseof specific products. There are indications, however,that such advice may before long be made available tothose who need it. This, if heeded, will avoid confusion,ensure the use of effective disinfectants, and sparereaders of medical journals the chore of readingtoo many articles on this subject.13. Searle, C. E., Harnden, D. G., Venitt, S., Gyde, O. H. B. Nature,

1975, 255, 506.14. Ames, B. N., Kammen, H. O., Yamasaki, E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci.,

U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2433.15. Christie, D. R. Lancet, 1967, i, 112.