Upload
sara-mcdowell
View
221
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project:
FSIS Results of Models Verification Testing
June 5, 2002
Dr. Columb RigneyUnited States Department of Agriculture
Food Safety and Inspection ServiceOffice of Public Health and Science
Number Name Location
P 165H OK Foods Inc. Heavener, OKP 165S OK Foods Inc. Ft. Smith, ARP 177 ConAgra Poultry Companies Gainesville, GAP 192 Gold Kist Inc. Guntersville, AL P 206 Pilgrims’ Pride Corporation Nacogdoches, TX P 290 Townsends Inc. Siler City, NCP 341 Golden Rod Broilers Inc. Cullman, ALP 468 Townsends of Arkansas Inc. Batesville, ARP 517 Marshall Durbin Poultry Co. Hattiesburg, MS P 548 Cagle’s Inc. Collinsville, AL
The 20 Young Chicken Establishments comprising FSIS Organoleptic Verification and
Pathogen Reduction/HACCP Microbial Data
Number Name Location
P 584 Pilgrims’ Pride Corporation Mount Pleasant, TX P 687 Columbia Farms Inc. West Columbia, SC P 727 Simmons Foods Inc. Southwest City, MO P 758 Choctaw Foods Inc. Carthage, MSP 810 Pilgrims’ Pride Inc. Moorefield, WVP 1249 Georges Chicken LLC Edinburg, VAP 1307 Marshall Durbin & Co. Inc. Jasper, ALP 6505 Norman W. Fries Inc. Claxton, GAP 7987 Amick Processing Inc. Batesburg, SCP 20245 Cagle’s – Keystone Foods LLC Albany, KY
The 20 Young Chicken Establishments comprising FSIS Organoleptic Verification and
Pathogen Reduction/HACCP Microbial Data
HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project:
FSIS Results of Organoleptic Verification Testing
• Performed on randomly selected carcasses from all production lines • Performed by FSIS Verification Inspectors
• Performed as two - 10 bird tests per line per shift
• Performed at a minimum frequency of 50 scheduled tests per shift • Performed independently of unscheduled tests conducted at the discretion of the IIC/SVMO
FSIS Organoleptic Verification Testing:Other Consumer Protection
OCP-1 Condition - Animal Diseases airsacculitis, arthritis, ascites, avian leukosis complex, avian tuberculosis, cadaver, carcinoma, enteritis, erysipelas, generalized inflammatory process, nephritis, osteomyelitis, pericarditis, sarcoma, salpingitis, and tenosynovitis
OCP-2 Condition - Miscellaneous breast blister, bruises, external
mutilation, fractures, localized inflammatory process, overscald, and sores/scabs
Other Consumer Protection (OCP) Performance Standard Categories
OCP-3 Contamination - Digestive Content ingesta
OCP-4 Dressing Defects - Other bile, extraneous material, feathers, lung, oil gland, and trachea
OCP-5 Dressing Defects - Digestive Tract Tissue bursa of fabricius, cloaca, crop, esophagus, and intestine
Other Consumer Protection (OCP) Performance Standard Categories
FSIS Models Results from Verification Testing OCP-1: Condition - Animal Diseases
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Pilot Performance Standard = 1.7 %
FSIS Models Results from Verification Testing OCP-2: Condition - Miscellaneous
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Pilot Performance Standard = 52.5 %
FSIS Models Results from Verification Testing OCP-3: Contamination - Ingesta
0
15
30
45
60
75
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f Car
cass
es w
ith D
efec
ts
Pilot Performance Standard = 18.6 %
FSIS Models Results from Verification Testing OCP-4: Dressing Defects - Other
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Pilot Performance Standard = 80.0 %
FSIS Models Results from Verification Testing OCP-5: Dressing Defects - Digestive Tract Tissue
0
15
30
45
60
75
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Pilot Performance Standard = 20.8 %
• Performed on randomly selected carcasses from all production lines
• Performed by FSIS Verification Inspectors
• Performed as eight-10 bird tests per line per shift
• Performed independently of unscheduled tests conducted at the discretion of IIC/SVMO
FSIS Organoleptic Verification Testing:Food Safety
FS-1 Condition - Infectious septicemia, toxemia
FS-2 Contamination - Digestive Content fecal material
Food Safety (FS)Performance Standard Categories
FSIS Models Results from Verification TestingFS-1: Condition - Infectious
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Performance Standard = Zero Tolerance
12th Position = 0.1 %
FSIS Models Results from Verification TestingFS-2: Contamination - Fecal Material
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f C
arc
ass
es
wit
h D
efe
cts
Performance Standard = Zero Tolerance
12th Position =1.5 %
HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project:
FSIS Results of Pathogen Reduction/HACCP Microbial Verification Testing
• Performed on randomly selected carcasses
• Performed by FSIS personnel
• Performed as a whole bird rinse
• Performed as a sample set of 51 carcasses
• Performed similarly in traditional and models establishments
FSIS PR/HACCP Microbial Verification Testing: Young Chickens (Broilers) -Salmonella
FSIS PR/HACCP Verification Data Salmonella - Traditional Systems
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f Car
cass
es w
ith P
ositi
ve R
esul
ts
FSIS PR/HACCP Verification Data Salmonella - HIMP System
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Establishment
% o
f Car
cass
es w
ith P
ositi
ve R
esul
ts
FSIS PR/HACCP Verification Data:Salmonella
02468
10121416182022
Establishment
Nu
mb
er o
f Salmonella
Po
sitiv
e C
arca
sses
Iden
tifie
d in
51
Car
cass
Sam
ple
Set
0 01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Each bar or color coded '0' represents a completed sample set.
Sample sets collected under traditional systems are coded in green.
Sample sets collected under the HIMP system are coded in violet.
* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Denotes that a sample set was not completed prior to entering HIMP.
Maximum number of positives to achieve standard = 12_______________________________________________________________
FSIS PR/HACCP Verification Data:Salmonella
02468
10121416182022
Establishment
Nu
mb
er o
f Salmonella
Po
sitiv
e C
arca
sses
Iden
tifie
d in
51
Car
cass
Sam
ple
Set
0 0 * 0 0
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Each bar or color coded '0' represents a completed sample set.
Sample sets collected under traditional systems are coded in green.Sample sets collected under the HIMP system are coded in violet.
* Denotes that a sample set was not completed prior to entering HIMP.
Maximum number of positives to achieve standard = 12__________________________________________________________
Salmonella Verification Testing - Performance Standard 20.0 %2001 National Verification Average (All Establishments - ‘A’ Sets)
11.9 %
Salmonella Prevalence - 20 Establishments - Traditional 7.6 %
Salmonella Prevalence - 20 Establishments - HIMP 8.0 %
FSIS PR/HACCP Microbial Verification Testing Summary: Young Chickens (Broilers)
• 9 of 20 establishments exhibited a lower Salmonella prevalence (%) in traditional systems.
• 9 of 20 exhibited a lower Salmonella prevalence (%) in models (HIMP).
• 1 of 20 establishments exhibited no change in Salmonella prevalence (%) between traditional and models (HIMP).
• 1 of 20 establishments had too few microbial tests completed in traditional to be comparable to testing in models (HIMP).
FSIS PR/HACCP Microbial Verification Testing Summary: Young Chickens (Broilers)
Completed Sample Sets Passed Failed
20 Establishments - Traditional Systems 45 2
20 Establishments - HIMP System 22 1
FSIS PR/HACCP Microbial Verification Testing Summary: Young Chickens (Broilers)