Upload
lillian-mcnulty
View
220
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Guiseppe GettoPh.D. Candidate
Rhetoric and Writing
Lansing/East Lansing, MI• Lots of non-profits and community-based
organizations and individuals i.e. neighorbhood organizations, teachers/schools,
food co-op, mentoring programs
Michigan State University (East Lansing)• Capital Area Community Media Center
Media creation, technology consulting, project management, tech/media workshops, service-learning students working with community orgs
• Graduate program in Rhetoric/Writing• WRA 135: FYC and service-learning class
Me/my colleagues• Activism/volunteering experience• Invested in community outreach and
multimedia writing• Service-learning and FYC teachers
My dissertation• Collected data on the collaborative writing
processes of students doing multimedia projects with community partners
Infrastructure=organizational structure + cultural practice • (Star and Ruhleder, Grabill, Cushman, and
Devoss)• i.e. CACMC, 4-H Mentorship Program, Central
Elementary art classroom, CAL Documentary Lab, classes in Rhetoric/Writing (taken), classes in WRAC (taught)
Local public=publicly active community• (Long, Matthews, Dewey)• i.e. a public is a community that purposefully
rhetorically effects other communities
Multimedia writing=remixing/remediating various modes of writing for rhetorical purposes• (Halbritter, Cushman, Wysocki, Bolter and
Grusin, Selber, Michel, Sheridan, and Ridolfo)
Capacity building=adding to an organizations ability to do work• (Craig, Flicker et al)
Infrastructures can be repurposed to remix/remediate in different ways, ways that build various capacities of community organizations
• WRA 135 – Writing: Public Life in America Service-learning through writing/civic engagement
<Becomes>
• WRA 135 – Rhetoric/Writing: Citizenship, Service-Learning, and Community media Service-learning through multimedia writing
Website for 4-H Mentorship Program
Video for Eric Staib, Art Teacher at Central Elementary School
Collaboration was very different than existing studies have shown
• The success-based model (Knievel) There is something called ‘successful collaboration’
which is knowable ahead of the writing situation
• vs…the iterative model??? (Getto, forthcoming) Collaboration is always already a kairotic endeavor Writers make do with materials, people, knowledges
available What will be successful is not known until completion
of writing process Success becomes evident through iteration
From one group’s member check video
2 student groups studied + 1.5 semesters taught=some impact on local infrastructures• Increased literate/rhetorical abilities of local
organizations• New version of WRA 135• Local non-profit leaders learning how to be
community partners for service-learners• Students learning how to work with each
other and community partners
Infrastructures are pervasive and rhetorical
• Work, school, social life, community organizations All structures and practices that affect a writer’s ability
to write in various, future situations
• Building sustainable infrastructures is probablistic (and hence rhetorical), meaning:
It’s never certain Changes aren’t permanent Foregrounding certain practices (iterative collaboration,
valuing knowledges of all those involved, capacity-building) maximizes probability of success