25
Guidelines to T ECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR MONOGRAPH REVIEW Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia Convention of the United States Monograph Review Committee (MRC) Approved by HPCUS Board of Directors for posting April 2014 1

Guidelines to Technical Information Requirements for Monograph … · 2014-06-27 · manufacturing methods are used, these shall be referenced. If noncompendial methods or processes

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Guidelines to TECHNICAL INFORMATION

    REQUIREMENTS

    FOR MONOGRAPH REVIEW

    Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia Convention

    of the United States

    Monograph Review Committee (MRC)

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 1

  • Table of Contents 1. FOREWORD 4

    1.1 Minimum Standards 4 1.2 Best Practices 4

    2. ADMINISTRATIVE 5

    2.1 Cover letters 5 2.2 Contact information 5 2.3 Presentation Content and Format 5

    3. GENERAL INFORMATION 6

    3.1 Nomenclature 6 3.2 Structure 6 3.3 General Properties 7

    4. MANUFACTURE 10

    4.1 Manufacturer(s) 10 4.2 Description of Manufacturing Process and Process 11 4.3 Control of Materials 11

    5. CONTROL OF DRUG SUBSTANCE 14

    5.1 Specification 14 5.2 Validation of Analytical Procedures 14

    6. REFERENCE STANDARDS OR MATERIALS 14

    6.1 Non-official Reference Standards 14

    7. SPECIAL STORAGE CONDITIONS 15

    7.1 Special Storage Conditions 15

    8. STABILITY 15

    8.1 Stability of Clinical Batches 15

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 2

  • 9. TOXICOLOGY AND SAFETY 15

    9.1 General Toxicological Requirements

    10. LITERATURE REFERENCES 17

    10.1 Important publications referenced in the report 17

    11. REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT 17

    11.1 Title Page 17 11.2 Introduction 17 11.3 Table of Contents 17 11.4 List of Abbreviations and Definition of Terms 18 11.3 Content 18

    12. REFERENCES 21

    12.1 Regulatory References

    13. APPENDICES 26

    13.1 Consolidated Monograph Review Checklist 26

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 3

  • 1. FOREWORD

    The following guidelines are presented to help monograph sponsors for homeopathic medicines assemble and present Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) and Safety information in a manner and format consistent with the expectations of the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia Convention of the United States (HPCUS) Monograph Review Committee (MRC) for approval; and to help guide reviewers who examine monograph submissions to ensure that expected standards of quality are being upheld. These guidelines contain two specific types of criteria: requirements and best practice recommendations. Requirements are recognized by language that is definitive, such as “should” [shall] or “will include”, while best practice recommendations will use qualifiers such as “is recommended”. For monograph approval, the submitted CMC and Safety information must meet all requirements.

    Monograph reviewers are instructed to ensure the following criteria are met:

    • The definition, description, nomenclature and general properties of the raw material offered for inclusion within the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS) are adequately described (Section 3).

    • The Manufacturing locations, processes and control of materials are identified where appropriate (Section 4).

    • The structure elucidation and characterization of the raw material, active principles of complex drug substances and their impurities, are, where appropriate, defined (Section 5).

    • The quality, storage conditions and stability of the raw material, are, where needed, clearly stated.

    • The safety of the starting material is established on a basis that allows for appropriate calculation of OTC, Rx and, where appropriate, external attenuations levels.

    1.1 Requirements A requirement that must be met for approval of the monograph. Non-compliance with these requirements will likely cause non-approval of a monograph. Requirements will be periodically updated as needed. Requirements contained within these guidelines for monograph submission are recognizable by

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 4

  • language that implies a required element, placement in the left column of the document, and appearance in the text as regular font.

    1.2 Best Practice Recommendation: Suggested method or practices or particular point that should be considered when conducting development and documentation of the raw material. Best practices will be updated as standards evolve. Best practice recommendations contained within these guidelines for monograph submission are recognizable by language describing the element as “recommended”, placement in the right column of the document, and appearance in the text as italicized font.

    REQUIREMENTS RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES

    2. ADMINISTRATIVE

    2.1 Cover letters

    Cover letters shall be addressed to the Editor of the HPCUS

    Description of what the sponsor is requesting of the HPCUS and the MRC.

    2.2 Contact Information

    Corporate name, address, Phone number

    Contact/agent, phone number, street and

    email addresses.

    2.3 Presentation, Content and Format

    Proposed monograph shall include both a descriptive section (Main monograph) and a Quality section (Standards and Controls monograph) in the format described by the Editor.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 5

  • Documentation supporting the Main and Standards and Controls monographs shall be presented in a format consistent with the Report Format and Content (see Section 11).

    Navigation – Submissions shall be in electronic format with an active table of contents

    3. GENERAL INFORMATION

    3.1 Nomenclature

    The drug substance shall be identified using current scientific nomenclature as follows:

    Botanical raw materials: Scientific Name: USDA GRIN Taxonomy name. Family, Genus, species, variety and chemo-type.

    Zoological raw materials: USDA Taxonomy name, Family, Genus, species, variety, tissue, fluid, part of organ, organ.

    Chemical raw materials: International Nonproprietary Name or Official name. IUPAC, CAS.

    It is recommended that the sponsor make reasonable attempts to provide other official nomenclature and synonyms:

    Other Pharmacopoeia Names

    Other Homeopathic Names

    Synonyms: English, Latin, French, German, Spanish, Italian, other

    It is recommended that any surrogate species within the genus or chemical class used as an active or marker compound reference shall be described according to the guidelines of nomenclature referenced under 3.1.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 6

  • 3.2 Structure

    For botanical and zoological raw materials, the chemical class of constituents or characteristic markers, if known, shall be described.

    For chemical raw materials, confirmation of the proposed chemical structure based on spectral data (especially 2D NMR and IR) and/or other relevant analytical data shall be provided, if applicable.

    Impurities

    Information on impurities shall be provided as applicable. Appropriate limits shall be established based on safety considerations and manufacturing experience and stability data.

    If applicable, any stereochemistry, including diastereoisomers and enantiomers of chemical starting materials shall be described.

    For chemical raw materials, schematic amino acid sequence glycosylation sites or other post-translational modifications and relative molecular weight, if applicable, shall be described.

    For peptides, characterization shall include data on the amino acid sequence, and, when relevant, peptide map. For DNA products, characterization shall include nucleic acid sequence, DNA melting point, and side chain modifications when applicable.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 7

  • 3. 3 General Properties

    For chemical raw materials, a list of physicochemical and other relevant properties of the drug substance shall be provided.

    It is recommended that the country of origin be described for botanical and zoological raw materials, and for naturally occurring chemical raw materials if applicable or relevant.

    The natural habitat and geographical It is recommended that distribution of the plant, alga, macroscopic information be included about fungi, or animal shall be provided. the current sources of the

    substance, including its geographical location and whether it is cultivated or harvested from the wild.

    It is recommended that information be included if the critical habitat of the species has been determined to be endangered or threatened.

    It is recommended that information be included if the species is an endangered or threatened species under the Endangered Species Act or the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.

    It is recommended that information be included if the species is entitled to special

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 8

  • protection under some other Federal law or international treaty to which the United States is a party.

    For botanical raw materials, the part of plant and stage of development shall be provided.

    Sponsor shall describe whether fresh or dried Botanical material was used.

    The morphological, histological and anatomical description (including gender, if applicable) shall be provided for zoological raw materials.

    These guidelines do not address Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) as starting raw materials. Sponsors are invited to discuss starting raw materials originating from genetically modified organisms directly with the MRC as necessary.

    For zoological raw materials, the age, health status, method of breeding and feeding of animals, immunization techniques (immune sera) with description of antigens, culture media (microbial strains) shall be described, if applicable.

    For zoological raw materials, the conditions of slaughter and dissection of animals, shall be described, if applicable.

    For zoological raw materials, an assessment of the risk of infectivity including viral, bacterial and prionic

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 9

  • diseases, shall be provided.

    For raw materials of viral origin: the method of inactivation shall be described.

    For chemical raw materials, any biological activity, if applicable, shall be described.

    Any Distribution controls on the starting material imposed by any regulatory authority shall be described.

    It is recommended that the sponsor make reasonable attempts to identify any addictive properties of the drug substance including literature review and abuse liability studies.

    It is recommended that Safe Handling Practices be included when such information can help protect laboratory personnel from unusual or unnecessary danger.

    4. MANUFACTURE

    4.1 Manufacturer(s)

    Sponsor shall provide the name, address, and responsibility of each manufacturer, including contractors, and each production site or facility for batches of homeopathic drug product referenced in the clinical submission.

    4.2 Description of Manufacturing

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 10

  • Process and Process Controls

    Sponsor shall identify manufacturing methods and processes used to manufacture batches of the homeopathic drug product used in clinical development of the drug substance. If compendial manufacturing methods are used, these shall be referenced. If noncompendial methods or processes are used, these shall be explained and described with the same level of detail as the primary process.

    4.3 Control of Materials

    It is recommended that information on the quality and control of materials used in the manufacture of the drug substance be provided and that information demonstrating the materials meet standards appropriate for their intended use should be provided, as appropriate.

    For botanical raw materials, a certificate of authenticity signed by a person who is appropriately qualified shall be provided.

    For botanical raw materials a macroscopic, and where applicable, a microscopic description of the plant and/or part used for clinical development against a voucher specimen shall be provided.

    Sponsor shall provide a photo of the voucher specimen.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 11

  • For botanical raw materials, a description of the appearance of the resulting tincture shall be provided.

    For botanical raw materials, a Chromatographic and or Spectrographic fingerprint is required. For zoological and chemical raw materials, Chromatographic and or Spectrographic fingerprints shall be provided, if applicable.

    All publicly available quality standards/methods for the drug substance shall be provided, if available.

    It is recommended that any marker compounds used in the suggested analytical methods be described.

    It is recommended that heavy metals limits for raw materials be provided and justified.

    It is recommended that for Botanical and Zoological raw materials, microbial limits be provided and justified

    It is recommended that residual pesticides, parent, or metabolites for botanical and zoological raw materials be identified.

    It is recommended that limits for adventitious toxins (e.g. botanicals: aflatoxins) in botanical and zoological raw materials be provided.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 12

  • Limits for foreign materials or adulterants shall be provided.

    Moisture content limits for chemical starting materials shall be provided.

    For chemical raw materials, a chemical or biological quantitative assay shall be provided. For botanical & zoological raw materials, the same shall be provided, if applicable.

    For zoological raw materials, a risk analysis or other evaluation of viral security shall be provided.

    For zoological raw materials, a risk analysis or other evaluation of TSE security shall be provided.

    When considering specifically the risk of transmission of TSE, raw and starting materials, excipients as well as reagents participating in the manufacturing process namely from bovine, ovine and caprine origin, and any other TSE susceptible species, shall comply with FDA guidelines regarding transmission of TSE. For zoological raw materials intended for manufacturing sarcodes, a Veterinary certificate of wholesomeness shall be

    It is recommended that limits for total ash for botanical raw materials be provided.

    It is recommended that moisture content limits for botanical and zoological raw materials be provided, if applicable.

    Based on risk analysis, it is recommended that appropriate limits for radioactivity be provided. .

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 13

  • provided.

    For any analytical procedures that are not referenced in an FDA recognized standard reference, a complete description of analytical procedures and appropriate validation data shall be provided.

    A Certificate of analysis for the raw material used in clinical batches shall be provided.

    5. CONTROL OF DRUG SUBSTANCE

    Specifications for the raw material shall be provided.

    Analytical procedures for the raw material used for the clinical batches shall be provided.

    6. REFERENCE STANDARDS OR MATERIALS

    Non-official Reference Standards It is recommended that when a national or international reference standard is not available, a sponsor's internal reference material that is representative of multiple source points may be used as a reference material, against which batches would be tested prior to their release. If this is the case, it is recommended that the sponsor's internal reference material be described.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 14

  • 7. SPECIAL STORAGE CONDITIONS

    Special storage conditions

    Any special storage conditions necessary to maintain the stability of the starting materials (and subsequent attenuations, if applicable) shall be described.

    8. STABILITY

    Stability

    Sponsor shall demonstrate that the starting material met specifications at the time the active ingredient was manufactured and the dosage form remained stable throughout the duration of the clinical studies.

    9. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION

    9.1 General Toxicological Requirements: Substances currently lawfully marketed as dietary supplements or otherwise without known safety concerns will often not require more than an integrated summary of available medical and toxicological databases. Substances not otherwise lawfully marketed or with known or potential safety concerns shall require up to a full battery of pharmacology and toxicology information. Sponsors shall provide experimental and or bibliographic evidence of safety within the following areas as necessary: Acute and repeat dose toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 15

  • reproductive toxicology, local tolerance , antigenicity, immunotoxicity, dependence, metabolites, impurities, other toxicology information For both risk classifications sponsors are referred to the HPCUS Toxicology and Safety Committee document: Guideline to Toxicological Information Requirements for Admission of a Homeopathic Substance into the HPUS

    10. LITERATURE REFERENCES

    10.1 Important Publications Referenced in this Report

    All publications cited in this submission shall be provided in English or translations upon request. Functioning links to internet sources are acceptable.

    11. REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT

    11.1 TITLE PAGE

    11.2 INTRODUCTION

    11.2.1 Brief introductory statement highlighting the principle Chemical, Physical, Manufacturing and Safety properties of the substance for review.

    11.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Table of contents shall be provided two steps down from the heading. For example:

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 16

  • 11.3 Report Format and Content 11.3.1 Table of Contents

    11.3.1.1 Topic of Interest

    Additional levels may be added as necessary.

    The table of contents shall be in an active format for easy navigation by reviewers.

    11.4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITION OF TERMS

    11.5 GENERAL INFORMATION

    11.5.1 Nomenclature

    11.5.1.1 Scientific naming 11.5.1.1 Synonyms

    11.5.2 Structure

    11.5.2.1 Chemical class 11.5.2.2 Surrogate markers 11.5.2.3 Structural formula 11.5.2.4 Stereochemistry 11.5.2.5 Molecular formula 11.5.2.6 Molecular weight 11.5.2.7 Amino acid sequence

    11.5.3 General Properties

    11.5.3.1 Physico-chemical properties

    11.5.3.2 Country of origin 11.5.3.3 Natural Habitat/Geographical distribution 11.5.3.4 Part of plant/Stage of development 11.5.3.5 Botanical fresh or dry 11.5.3.6 Morphological, histological, anatomical description 11.5.3.7 Current sources of the drug substance 11.5.3.8 Age, health status and cultivation of donor animals 11.5.3.9 Conditions of slaughter 11.5.3.10 Risk assessment of infectivity viral, bacterial, prionic 11.5.3.11 Method of inactivation for drug substances of viral origin 11.5.3.12 Biological activity 11.5.3.13 Any distribution controls imposed by regulatory authorities

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 17

    http:11.5.3.13http:11.5.3.12http:11.5.3.11http:11.5.3.10

  • 11.5.3.14 Critical habitat assessment (endangered) 11.5.3.15 Species endangered 11.5.3.16 Safe handling practices

    11.6 MANUFACTURE

    11.6.1 Manufacturer(s) 11.6.2 Manufacturing process

    11.6.3 Control of Materials

    11.6.3.1 Quality and control of materials

    11.6.3.2 Botanical certificate of authenticity 11.6.3.3 Macroscopic description 11.6.3.4 Microscopic description 11.6.3.5 Photo of voucher specimen 11.6.3.6 Appearance 11.6.3.7 Chromatic or spectrographic fingerprint 11.6.3.8 Publicly available quality methods 11.6.3.9 Heavy metals 11.6.3.10 Microbial limits 11.6.3.11 Residual pesticides 11.6.3.12 Adventitious toxins 11.6.3.13 Foreign material or adulterants 11.6.3.14 Total ash 11.6.3.15 Moisture content 11.6.3.16 Radioisotope contamination 11.6.3.17 Quantitative assay 11.6.3.18 Certification of viral security 11.6.3.19 Certification of TSE security 11.6.3.20 Certificate of wholesomeness 11.6.3.21 Description of analytical procedures 11.6.3.22 Certificate of analysis

    11.7 CONTROL OF THE DRUG SUBSTANCE

    11.7.1 Specification 11.7.2 Validation of analytical procedures

    11.8 REFERENCE STANDARDS

    11.8.1 Non-official reference standards

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 18

    http:11.6.3.22http:11.6.3.21http:11.6.3.20http:11.6.3.19http:11.6.3.18http:11.6.3.17http:11.6.3.16http:11.6.3.15http:11.6.3.14http:11.6.3.13http:11.6.3.12http:11.6.3.11http:11.6.3.10http:11.5.3.16http:11.5.3.15http:11.5.3.14

  • 11.9 SPECIAL STORAGE CONDITIONS

    11.9.1 Special storage conditions

    11.10 STABILITY

    11.10.1 Stability of clinical batches

    11.11 TOXICOLOGY

    11.11.1 Acute toxicity 11.11.2 Repeat dose toxicity 11.11.3 Genotoxicity

    11.11.4 Carcinogenicity 11.11.5 Reproductive toxicology 11.11.6 Local tolerance 11.11.7 Antigenicity 11.11.8 Immunotoxicity 11.11.9 Dependence 11.11.10 Metabolites 11.11.11 Impurities 11.11.12 Other toxicology information

    11.12 LITERATURE REFERENCES

    11.12.1 Literature References used in this report

    11.13 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

    12 REFERENCES

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 19

    http:11.11.12http:11.11.11http:11.11.10

  • (1) Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States. www.hpus.org. (2) United States Pharmacopoeia. General Chapters. www.usp.org. (3) European Pharmacopoeia. General Chapters. www.edqm.eu. (4) Guidance for Industry. Botanical Drug Products. U.S. Department of Health and

    Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. June 2004. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0 70491.pdf

    (5) Guidance for Industry. INDs for Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies, Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls Information. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. May 2003. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from on line at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0 70567.pdf.

    (6) Guidance for Industry. Residual Solvents in Drug Products Marketed in the United States. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. November 2009. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0 70621.pdf.

    (7) Guidance for Industry. Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation, Chemical Manufacturing and Controls Documentation. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance. August 2000. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM1 22858.pdf.

    (8) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG). Guidance on Module 3 of the Homeopathic Medicinal Products Dossier. November 2007. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/79.html.

    (9) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG). Points to Consider on Safety of Homeopathic Medicinal Products of Biological Origin. July 2007. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/79.html.

    (10) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG). Points to Consider on Safety of Homeopathic Medicinal Products of Botanical, Mineral, and Chemical Origin. July 2007. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/79.html.

    (11) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG). Points to Consider on Stability Testing of Homeopathic Medicinal Products. July 2009. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from on line at http://www.hma.eu/79.html.

    (12) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG). Points to Consider on Safety of Homeopathic Medicinal Products of Biological Origin. July 2007. Last downloaded August 1, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01-About_HMA/Working_Groups/HMPWG/2007_07_safety_MP_BO.pdf

    ( 13) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG) Introduction to the List of First Safe Dilutions. May 10, 2010 Last downloaded August 1, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01-About_HMA/Working_Groups/HMPWG/2010_05_HMPWG_First_Safe_Dilutions. pdf

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 20

    http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01http://www.hma.eu/79.htmlhttp://www.hma.eu/79.htmlhttp://www.hma.eu/79.htmlhttp://www.hma.eu/79.htmlhttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM1http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM0http:www.edqm.euhttp:www.usp.orghttp:www.hpus.org

  • (14) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG) Structure of the List of First Safe Dilutions. May 10, 2010 Last downloaded August 1, 2013 from online at http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01-About_HMA/Working_Groups/HMPWG/2010_05_HMPWG_Stucture_of_List_of_ FSD.pdf

    (15) Homeopathic Medicinal Products Working Group (HMPWG) Assessment Report Template First Safe Dilution. May 10, 2010 Last downloaded August 1, 2013 from online at: http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01-About_HMA/Working_Groups/HMPWG/2010_05_FSD_assessment_report_list.pdf

    (16) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q1A Stability Testing of New Drug Substance and Products. February 2003. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/stability-testing-of-new-drug-substances-and-products.html.

    (17) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q1B Stability Testing: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. November 1996. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/stability-testing-photostability-testing-of-new-drug-substances-and-products.html.

    (18) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q1C Stability Testing for New Dosage Forms. November 1996. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/stability-testing-for-new-dosage-forms.html.

    (19) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q1D Bracketing and Matrixing Designs for Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products. February 2002. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/bracketing-and-matrixing-designs-for-stability-testing-of-new-drug-substances-and-products.html.

    (20) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q1E Evaluation for Stability Data. February 2003. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/evaluation-of-stability-data.html.

    (21) World Health Organization, WHO Technical Report Series No. 953 2009. Stability Testing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Finished Pharmaceutical Products. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/38700550/Who-Technical-Report-Series-No-953-2009.

    (22) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q2 Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology. October 1994/November 1996. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/validation-of-analytical-procedures-text-and-methodology.html.

    (23) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q3A Impurities in New Drug Substances. October 2006. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-in-new-drug-substances.html.

    (24) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q3B Impurities in New Drug Products. June 2006. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-in-new-drug-products.html.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 21

    http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-in-new-drughttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-in-new-drughttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/validation-of-analyticalhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/38700550/Who-Technical-Report-Series-No-953-2009http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/evaluation-of-stabilityhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/bracketing-andhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/stability-testing-for-newhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/stability-testinghttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/qualityhttp://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01http://www.hma.eu/fileadmin/dateien/Human_Medicines/01

  • (25) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q3C Impurities: Guideline for Residual Solvents. February 2011. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-guideline-for-residual-solvents.html.

    (26) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q5A Viral Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology Products Derived from Cell Lines of Human or Animal Origin. September 1999. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/viral-safety-evaluation-of-biotechnology-products-derived-from-cell-lines-of-human-or-animal-origin.html.

    (27) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q6A Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances. October 1999. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/specifications-test-procedures-and-acceptance-criteria-for-new-drug-substances-and-new-drug-produc.html.

    (28) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q6B Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Biotechnological/Biological Products. March 1999. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/specifications-test-procedures-and-acceptance-criteria-for-biotechnologicalbiological-products.html.

    (29) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. November 2007. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/good-manufacturing-practice-guide-for-active-pharmaceutical-ingredients.html.

    (30) Guidance for Industry Single Dose Acute Toxicity Testing for Pharmaceuticals U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance. August 1996. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidanc es/ucm079270.pdf

    (31) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). S1A Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. November 1995. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/need-for-carcinogenicity-studies-of-pharmaceuticals.html.

    (32) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). S1B Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals. July 1997. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/testing-for-carcinogenicity-of-pharmaceuticals.html.

    (33) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). S1C Dose Selection Studies for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals March 2008. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Safety/S1C_R2/St ep4/S1C_R2__Guideline.pdf

    (34) International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). S2 Guidance on Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals Intended for Human Use. November 2011. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/guidance-on-

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 22

    http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/guidance-onhttp://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Safety/S1C_R2/Sthttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/testing-forhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safetyhttp://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidanchttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/good-manufacturinghttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/specifications-testhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/qualityhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/viral-safety-evaluationhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/quality-single/article/impurities-guideline-for

  • genotoxicity-testing-and-data-interpretation-for-pharmaceuticals-intended-for-human-use.html.

    (35) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S3A Note for Guidance on Toxicokinetics: The Assessment of Systemic Exposure in Toxicity Studies. October 1994. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/note-for-guidance-on-toxicokinetics-the-assessment-of-systemic-exposure-in-toxicity-studies.html.

    (36) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S3B Pharmacokinetics: Guidance for Repeated Dose Tissue Distribution Studies. October 1994. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/pharmacokinetics-guidance-for-repeated-dose-tissue-distribution-studies.html.

    (37) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S4 Duration of Chronic Toxicity Testing in Animals (Rodent and NON Rodent Toxicity Testing). September 1998. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/duration-of-chronic-toxicity-testing-in-animals-rodent-and-non-rodent-toxicity-testing.html.

    (38) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S5 Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products & Toxicity to Male Fertility. November 2000. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/detection-of-toxicity-to-reproduction-for-medicinal-products-toxicity-to-male-fertility.html.

    (39) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S6 Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology – Derived Pharmaceuticals. June 2011. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/preclinical-safety-evaluation-of-biotechnology-derived-pharmaceuticals.html,

    (40) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S7A Safety Pharmacology Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals. November 2000. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/safety-pharmacology-studies-for-human-pharmaceuticals.html.

    (41) International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH). S8 Immunotoxicity Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals. Septemer 2005. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/immunotoxicity-studies-for-human-pharmaceuticals.html.

    (42) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Food and Drug Administration Part 210 and 211. Current Good Manufacturing Practices in Manufacturing, Processing, Packaging and Holding of Drugs. Last downloaded April 10, 2013 from online at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=210 and http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=211.

    Approved  by HPCUS Board  of Directors for posting April  2014 23

    http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=211http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=210http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safetyhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safetyhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safetyhttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/detection-of-toxicity-tohttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/duration-of-chronichttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/pharmacokineticshttp://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/note-for-guidance-on

  • Approved  by  HPCUS  Board  of  Directors  for  posting  April  2014   24    

    13.

    APPENDIX

  • Approved  by  HPCUS  Board  of  Directors  for  posting  April  2014   25    

    13.

    APPENDIX CONT’D

    Structure BookmarksGuidelines to. TECHNICAL INFORMATION. REQUIREMENTS. FOR MONOGRAPH REVIEW. Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia. Convention. of the United States. Monograph Review Committee (MRC) 1. FOREWORD REQUIREMENTS .RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES 2.1 Cover letters 2.2 Contact Information 2.3 Presentation, Content and Format 3.1 Nomenclature 3.2 Structure 3. 3 General Properties 11.1 TITLE PAGE 11.3 Report Format and Content. 11.3.1 Table of Contents .11.3.1.1 Topic of Interest.