Upload
lamphuc
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
• Introduction • BP’s North Sea Strategy • Procurement and Supply Chain Management
(PSCM) Process • Context and Challenges
– 50% Cost Challenge – Wells Decommissioning
• Questions
Agenda - GWO
Forward-Looking Statements During the course of this presentation we may make forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future performance of the company. No reliance should be placed on forward looking statements which are included only to provide indicative information and should always be considered in conjunction with an assessment of the political, economic, social and legal environment in which BP operates. Such forward looking statements speak only as of the time of this presentation today. Accordingly BP does not undertake any obligation to update or revise them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than that as required by applicable laws.
Cautionary Note
• Lower for longer but demand steadily increasing to 2035
• Greater focus on competitive incumbent positions
• Significant potential remaining in UKCS
• Norway – repositioned: focus the business in the UKCS
• UK strategy evolving Shetland
Central North Sea
Decommissioning
Oil Pipelines
Natural Gas Pipelines
OBO Pipelines
Value focus & growing production
North Sea Region Portfolio
BP North Sea growing our business
Share Fair 2015 – now executing and strategy evolving…
Focus Maximise Invest
Safety Focus on our people Deliver the plan to 2020 Modernize & Transform Build our future
• Safety remains No. 1
• No accidents,
• No harm to people,
• No damage to the environment
• Control of our hydrocarbons every day
• Continue to invest in and compete for capability & skills
• Technical development
• Clear career paths
• Leverage global workforce
• Build leadership skills
• Recognition & inclusion
• Delivery never compromises safety
• Clear plans, KPI, milestones by asset
• Every team, every person understands how they contribute
• Drive efficiency, continuous improvement.
• Communicate and recognise progress
• Leverage strong incumbent resource base
• Develop position WOS
• Invest and sustain CNS
• Strong medium term opportunity set
• 3-5 exploration wells 2017
• Active participation in licence rounds
• Simplify & lighten the load
• Use technology to create a transformation
• Improve IT and communication equipment.
• Get our existing systems working for us.
• Prioritised technology plan for the region to identify new technology
• Transform our business culture
• Direct supplier relationships for more critical activity
BP Supply Chain Process
Sp
end
$
Criticality/Complexity
Supplier Engagement Matrix
• We need supply chain help to improve efficiency and meet challenges
• We’ll listen to all credible offers
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
9 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
Year of Spud
Cos
t $M
M/1
000f
t
Year of Spud
Average dry hole cost / 1000ft rose from $0.5mm in 2000 to $3.5mm in 2014
Average completed well cost / 1000ft rose from $1mm in 2000 to $6mm in 2014
Cos
t $M
M/1
000f
t
BP North Sea Context
Industry Context
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
10 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
50% Cost Challenge – Region Objective
Continue work on previous initiatives and seek opportunities to reduce every component of well cost. A review of well cost escalation since ~2003-2005 identified the following areas as having particularly high increases and are being scrutinised
• Tangibles: 2x increase
• Mud, Chemical and Engineering Support: 2x – 4x increase
• Cement, Additives and Engineering Support: 2x – 3x increase
• Casing Running Services: 0x - 3x increase
• Directional Drilling, MWD and LWD: 2x – 4x increase
• Diving and ROV: 2x – 3x increase
• Wellhead Maintenance: 2x - 4x increase
• Mud Logging and Wellsite Geo – 2x - 3x increase
• Logistics: 3x - 5x increase
Focus not limited to these areas, but these are the most significant
What further opportunities are there to reduce costs?
• We know we’ve drilled the same wells for much less cost before
• More of this is coming from different scope and choices than inflation
• If you only had 50% of the budget how would you deliver the well?
• What are we doing differently in terms of well design, specification, equipment / bulk selection, re-use, personnel, operational practices or contingencies?
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
11 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
50% Cost Challenge – Scope Clarity & Active Management
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
12 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
50% Cost Challenge – Progress & Needs
Our Challenge:
• Continue and build on the work done to date and reset expectations on cost targets.
• Target reduction in well costs by 50% from end 2015 baseline
We are:
• Using a Minimum Technical Scope approach from the start to explicitly justify in design choices.
• Rigorously assessing what we really need to purchase and rent for equipment and services to execute the design - and how long we need it for
• Keeping detailed information on spend and progress towards the 50% target from 2015 baseline
• Making progress on our aspiration of top quartile delivery on all our wells
We need:
• Early engagement with you to identify:
• Where we can eliminate unnecessary cost and scope, or do things a different way
• Ways to achieve the same design outcome with less expensive or more efficient equipment and services – including appropriate use of technology
It’s not all about cheaper rates – there is much more scope for cost reduction in efficient use of appropriate equipment and services, and judicious choices of when and how much of them we use
We already have great examples where good ideas from suppliers have resulted in a cheaper, simpler and safer outcome on well activity - without talking about rates. We need more.
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
14 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
Decommissioning Expenditure
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
$ m
illio
n gr
oss (
est)
Decommissioning Spend 2016 – 2025*
• 125 platform wells
• 80 subsea wells
• Wells range from 5-40 years old
• Mix of oil and gas producers and injectors
• Current estimate >15 years wells activity *Based on current expected CoP dates
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
15 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
Risks/Opportunities (Wells)
+ -
Technology Development
Well integrity
Scope Identified
Work Platform
Contracting strategy
Efficient Campaigns
Develop and deploy priority technology to market
Existing tech not optimised for P&A, access reduces as P&A activity ramps up
Early surveillance helps descope P&A ops
Well conditions increases P&A workscope
Reduce Workscope through early subsurface characterisation & risk based isolation strategy
Workscope larger than forecasted
Alternative rig strategy/SIMOPS plan developed
Rig requires start-up/ refurbishment/recertification
New contracting strategy drives better performance
Rates higher than estimated. Supply is tight as demand increases
Batched operations, people/process/equipment efficiencies through bundling activity
P&A operations performed ad-hoc without strategic planning and integration
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
16 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
Decommissioning Technology Focus Areas
We need help in developing & deploying the following areas: • Efficient Material Removal
• Lasers, Milling, Melting/Corroding, Cutters, Swedging, Tubular Deposit Removal
• Logging / Surveillance • Through tubing logging, Multistring gas detection, Solids ID, Alternative barriers verification
• Subsea Annulus Access
• Pressure Monitoring, Annular remediation,
• Effective Barrier Creation & Verification • Shale, Salt, Barite, Thermite Tools, Cementing Around Control Lines
• Riserless Subsea P&A
• Well Control Systems
• Pressure Monitoring • Remote Annulus Monitoring, Deep Barrier Monitoring, Long Term Suspension, Riser less
P&A, Dual Deep Plug
Draft : For review and discussion purposes only. Requires legal review for consistency and fact checking.
18 BP Confidential 2 November 2016
Feedback
All enquiries should be addressed to; [email protected] We will endeavour to respond to all enquiries within 30 days