Upload
wendi
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Group Intention effects on REG. Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005. From Margins of Reality. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Group Intention effects on REG
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
From Margins of Reality
“…Deliberate investigations of group interactions with
physical systems and processes, beginning with
multiple operator experiments…or others
testing various implications of the model for group behavior,
could be instructive.”(p.328)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Overview of Method
1. Compile group operator data.
2. ShortREG Analysis Panel
a. Calculate basic statistics: mean, standard deviation.
b. Graph REG output.
c. Implement Excel to compute Chi2.
3. Conduct Chi2 test on PSY/ORF 322 (2005): high, low, baseline, total.
4. Analyze results.
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Our Working Data
Group Data SetSerie
sDates Conducted
Operators
Age Range
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.712 6 11/11 – 11/19/1998 N/A 19-22
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.921 12 03/28 – 04/14/2005 3 – 10 19-22
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.703 7 02/24 – 03/11/1999 ~12 4th Grade
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 10 03/21 – 05/26/2000 ~12 4th Grade*
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.716 8 03/23 – 05/31/2001 ~12 4th Grade
Tower Hill School TWRHLL.720 1 11/29/1999 ~15 High School
[Calibration Data] CALIB.991 33 (older) N/A N/A
[Calibration Data] CALIB.995 6 (recent) N/A N/A*A class of second graders operated series #10 of HILLSBOR.704
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Aggregate Means
Group Data Set Series High Baseline Low
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.712 6 99.73 99.89 100.13
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.921 12 100.01 100.039 100.26
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.703 7 99.72 99.679 99.80
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 1-9 100.08 99.91 99.97
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 10 99.23 100.48 100.18
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.716 8 99.82 99.96 99.98
Tower Hill School TWRHLL.720 1 98.8 99.67 100.42
[Calibration Data] CALIB.991 33 NA 99.99 NA
[Calibration Data] CALIB.995 6 NA 99.95 NA
Total Hillsboro 703, 704, 716 24 99.24 100.48 100.19
Total PSY/ORF 712, 921 18 99.93 100.00 100.15
Total Calibration 991, 995 39 NA 99.98 NA
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Aggregate Standard Deviations
Group Data Set Series High Baseline Low
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.712 6 6.93 6.96 6.93
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.921 12 7.07 7.19 7.07
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.703 7 7.18 7.14 7.22
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 1-9 7.07 6.95 7.28
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 10 7.46 6.78 7.72
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.716 8 7.08 7.04 7.07
Tower Hill School TWRHLL.720 1 7.09 7.17 6.90
[Calibration Data] CALIB.991 33 NA 7.08 NA
[Calibration Data] CALIB.995 6 NA 7.07 NA
Total Hillsboro 703, 704, 716 24 7.09 7.04 7.17
Total PSY/ORF 712, 921 18 7.07 7.12 7.07
Total Calibration 991, 995 39 NA 7.075 NA
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Chi2 Test
Group Data Set Series High Baseline Low
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.712 6 1.69 0.29 0.44
PSY/ORF 322 HIP.921 12 0 0.5 3.33
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.703 7 2.11 3.01 1.03
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 1-9 0.3 0.32 0.02
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.704 series 10 2.34 0.94 0.14
Hillsboro School HILLSBOR.716 8 1.02 0.04 0.01
Tower Hill School TWRHLL.720 1 5.76 0.44 0.71
[Calibration Data] CALIB.991 33 NA 0.42 NA
[Calibration Data] CALIB.995 6 NA 1.48 NA
Total Hillsboro 703, 704, 716 24 4.32 3.9 1.12
Total PSY/ORF 712, 921 18 1.03 0.09 3.39
Total Calibration 991, 995 39 NA 1.91 NA
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Calibration (Older)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Calibration (Recent)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Calibration (Total)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Hillsboro (2nd Grade, 2000)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Hillsboro (4th Grade, 1999)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Hillsboro (4th Grade, 2000)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Hillsboro (4th Grade, 2001)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Hillsboro (Total)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Tower Hill (High School)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
PSY/ORF 322 Class (1998)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
PSY/ORF 322 Class (2005)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
PSY/ORF 322 Class (Total)
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
PSY/ORF 322 Detailed Data (2005)High Baseline Low
Group # Boys # Girls Total Mean St. Dev. Mean St. Dev. Mean St. Dev.
1 3 1 499.3 7.0632 99.39 7.1589 99.06 6.7716
99.36 7.7035 100.48 7.8759 100.39 6.4164
2 3 4 7100.96 7.233 *98.93 7.6624 99.62 7.8801
100.49 6.8586 99.18 6.3634 99.32 7.4181
3 2 3 5100.04 7.0952 99.75 7.216 100.29 7.249
99.25 7.3214 100.21 7.0629 100.72 6.781
4 4 1 599.45 6.8555 100.42 6.6533 100.47 7.1102
100.34 7.3803 101.03 6.545 100.49 7.334
5 2 3 5100.9 6.5636 99.67 6.8579 100.33 2.6384
100.95 6.8111 99.67 6.921 99.96 7.0495
6 3 1 499.29 6.7864 99.03 7.6613 101.18 6.4187
100.46 7.5417 *101.44 6.6656 100.93 6.9388
7 2 1 3100.25 7.0873 100.47 7.5951 100.16 7.2247
*98.5 7.6719 *101.52 6.8039 100.19 6.4129
8 5 3 899.46 7.918 *101.69 7.5018 100.31 7.0305
100.05 6.6308 100.63 7.4815 99.27 7.0394
9 5 1 6100.06 7.068 99.21 6.6139 99.93 6.9765
*101.29 6.9679 100.36 6.9971 100.33 6.8003
10 7 1 8100.15 7.0787 99.51 7.4759 101.02 7.829
100.41 7.0095 99.85 7.234 *101.56 6.936
11 4 6 1099.05 6.649 100.69 7.6419 99.51 6.8909
100.23 6.8222 100.5 7.6337 100.24 7.1352
12 4 1 5100.76 6.9865 99.2 6.7659 101.13 7.0891
99.24 6.3789 98.94 7.3686 99.91 7.1437
Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005
Chi2 Analysis, Conclusions
Chi2 Square Analysis of PSY/ORF Data
Intention Chi2 DF
High 24.0944 24
Baseline 32.5726 24
Low 21.8700 24
TOTAL 78.5370 72
Notes:1. For both groups of PSY/ORF 322 classes there is a very evident mean shifting
in the opposite direction of intention.2. This is also the case for the aggregate data of the Hillsboro school students and
the one class of high school students from Tower Hill.3. While it would be convenient to attribute this effect to the machine, calibration
data indicates a nearly perfect mean and standard deviation without intentions.