Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global Fund. Katja Roll External Relations and Partnerships

Green Climate Fund TCGeneva, 9 September 2011

Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global Fund.

Katja Roll External Relations and Partnerships


Overview

Key Themes

• The Model of the Global Fund• Governance at the country – CCM• Grant Implementation arrangements – PR• Experience with Multi-Stakeholder Engagement


The Global Fund

Mandate and Model • Created in 2002 to finance the scale up of prevention, treatment and

care programs against the three diseases

• Global Fund model is based on country ownership, multi-stakeholder engagement and performance-based funding

• Total pledges available = US$ 30.6 billion

• To date, USD 22.4 billion approved, USD 14 billion disbursed

• Grants in 150 countries of which 90% are low and low-middle income countries

• Approximately 1/3 of granted resources is being channelled through civil society organisations


The Global Fund

Evolution of Funding (2002-2010)


The Global Fund

Contributions Top 10 Public Donors (2002-2010)

Total contributions from public donors (2002-2010):US$ 18.1 billion (95% of the total)


The Global Fund

Key Actors• The Global Fund Board• The Global Fund Secretariat• The Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM)• The Technical Review Panel • The Principal Recipient (PR)• Sub Recipients• The Local Fund Agent (LFA)• The Global Fund Trustee• The Office of Inspector General (OIG)• Technical Partners


Donor Voting Block: Germany, Canada, Switzerland European Commission (Belgium,

Portugal, Finland) France, Spain Italy Japan Point Seven United Kingdom, Australia United States of America Private Foundations Private Sector

Implementing Voting Block: Eastern Europe Eastern Mediterranean Eastern and Southern Africa Latin America and the Caribbean South East Asia Western and Central Africa Western Pacific Developed Country NGO Developing Country NGO NGO rep of communities living with

the diseases

Non-voting Board Members World Health Organization World Bank UNAIDS Global Fund Partners (RBM, Stop TB, UNITAID) Board Designated Non-Voting Swiss Member

10 10

Governance at the global level

Composition of the international Board


Governance at the country level

The Country Coordinating Mechanism

Why a (new) mechanism?

•Kofi Annan 2000: Need new mechanism because no other funding model existed that:

–Could move resources fast and efficiently (i.e. NOT UN, not WB)

–Was unencumbered by excessive politics (i.e. bilateral efforts)

–Integrated both public and private efforts (i.e. donors either funded NGOs directly or government directly, but couldn’t seem to bring the two together)


• Coordinate the development and submission of national proposals

• Nominate the Principal Recipient

• Oversee implementation of approved grants including assessment of Principal Recipient’s performance

• Approve any reprogramming and submit requests for continuation of funding

• Ensure linkages and consistency between Global Fund grants and other national health and development programs


The CCM: Roles and Responsibilities


• Transparent selection process for non-government sector

• Membership of affected communities

• Transparent proposal solicitation and review

• Transparent process for PR nomination

• Broad stakeholder input in proposal and oversight plan

• Conflict of interest policy


The CCM: Eligibility Criteria



The CCM: Composition – Global Perspective

Composition by Sector

Strong recommendation that CCMs have 40% representation of non-governmental bodies.



The CCM: Leadership by sector

EDU7% FBO

6%

GOV29%

ML/BL13%

NGO24%

KAP2%

OTH1%

PLWD13%

PS5%

EDU7%

FBO2%

GOV71%

ML/BL1%

NGO11%

KAP1%

OTH0%

PLWD3%

PS4%

Chair Distribution Vice Chair Distribution


Grant Implementation

The Principle Recipient = Lead Implementer

•Signs a grant agreement with the Global Fund•Is legally responsible for the implementation of the approved proposal•Receives disbursement from the Global Fund’s Trustee •Is responsible for disbursed funds – including funding disbursed to/through Sub-Recipients•Reports on results to the Global Fund (through Local Fund Agent)•Reports on progress to the CCM


Requirements and Assessment and Scrutiny of PRs1) Capacity Description in the proposal

2) PR Assessment (after proposal approval) Is done by the Local Fund Agent (LFA) Looks into the following areas:

– Financial Management and Systems– Program Management – Sub-recipient Management – Pharmaceutical and Health Product Management and – Monitoring and Evaluation.

3) Conditions Precedent and management actions

4) Progress against agreed programmatic targets and conditions precedents decides upon disbursement


Multiple Implementer

Dual-Track Financing (DTF)Recommendation that each proposal includes a government

Principal Recipient (PR) and a non government Principal Recipient. If a proposal does not include both government and non-government PRs, it should contain an explanation of the reason

Globally approximately 35% of GF resources are implemented by PRs from the non-government sector- Round 8: 48% of proposals with DTF - Round 9: 41% of proposals with DTF - Round 10: 32% of proposals with DTF

Engagement of local civil society PRs is increasing across all the regions


Performance Experience

Principal Recipient Rating by Sector

Civil Society PRs show very good results!


Thank you very much.Especially for questions and comments.

Documents

Green Climate Fund TC Geneva, 9 September 2011 Enhanced Direct Access – The approach of the Global Fund. Katja Roll External Relations and Partnerships