Upload
janice-miles
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
VUV photon absorption in warm dense matterJ. Meyer-ter-Vehn and A. Tronnier
Max-Planck-Institute for Quantum Optics, Garching, GermanyV. Krainov (MIFT, Moscow)
0.5
1
1.5
2
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
/F
T TB Fk T
1 s,effv T
Al (solid density)
DESY VUV-FEL (FLASH) parameters 2006
1.5 *1012 photons= 32.3 nm (38 eV)
40 -50 fsfocus: 20 – 35 m
presently
implies
Pulse energy: ≈10 µJPulse power: 250 MWIntensity: ≤ 1014 W/cm2
heats metals up to ≈ few eV
38 eV photons
Al foil
Major problem for DESYpeak intensity experimentsis presently to reduce thefocal spot.
Now campaign for 2 m focus!
VUV-photon interaction model:Collisional absorption and photo-ionisation
Dispersion relation
2T rk k ic
Light intensity
I ~ |E |2 ~ exp(-x)
Dielectric function for quasi-free electrons (Drude model)
2
2
11
1 /p
Tei
collision frequency e <<
2
2 2 2
1
1
p
pc
What we used so far at MPQ
Laser absorption ( = 0.8 m) in Al versus
intensity (temperature)
Expt: Price et al.,PRL 75, 252 (1995)
Eidmann et al., PRE62, 1202 (2000)
Al refl.
Photon absorption by inverse Bremsstrahlung
x
p
p
Z
Start from spontaneous Bremsstrahlung emission rate
( , )spe ip p p
dR n
d
Do not forget about stimulated emission :
1( )tot sh
pe peR R n
stimulatedemission
22 30
2
8 ph
Ecn
Photon number per quantum state
2
3 2
( ) /( ', ) 64 '
3 ( ') (1 exp( 2 '))(exp( 2 ) 1)
d F dd p p p
d c p p p
Use differential cross-section (Sommerfeld, atomic units):
/Z p
24 /( )pp p p
221 /p pp
Absorption by Inverse Bremsstrahlung
Z x
p
p
( , )aR p p
Photon absorption rate
1
( , ) ( )
( , ) ( )
ph
aphsp
e
E E
E E
p p dZ d
p p dZ d n
R pn
R p
Ratio of absorption and emission rate only depends on final state densities:
Total absorption rate:
22 30
2
8 ( , ) ( , )( , )tot
t a i
p p p pp p
Ec d dw R n p p
d d
stim. emission
2 2p p
absorption2 2p p
Parameter plane of radiative Coulomb scattering
(I) Fast electrons (Born approx.)
2 2
30
3
2
3
it
Z n Ew
p
(II) Slow electrons (p3/Z>1) V.Krainov, JETP 92, 960 (2001)
2 2 30
3 3
2
3lni th
tth
Z n E pw
p Z
(III) Slow electrons (p 3/Z<1) V. Krainov, J.Phys.B33, 1585 (2000)
2 202/33
11.65 i
t
Z n E
pw
Z
p
Z
2p
3
1p
Z
3
1p
Z
fastslow
electrons
high low frequency
(I)
(II)(III)
1
2 2 30
3 3
2
3lni th
tth p
Z n E pw
p Z
Spitzer
result
Fermi average <1/p> including Pauli blocking
3
3
2 3 1ln
12( ) 1 ( ) 1 F
e
yF
y zF
zp d p e
en h p
Tf f h e
T
p
p
Integration over Fermi sphere ( , , ):/ By k T / Bz k T 2 / 2F B F Fk T p m
h
F
Collision frequency (slow electrons):
33 2
0 3
2/3
2 2 1.32/ ( , )e th
th
eff t
Zn pE
p Zv w F T h
( , ) 2
th F
F
p pF T h
p p
1/ 23
min , 1 for T 04 F F
T h
T
1 for T
( ) /( ) 1 1Bk Tf e 3
32( )( ) e p
hn f d p
Collision frequency (interpolated model)
3
3
2/31.32
22 2 ( , )ln 1e th
th
eff
Zn pF T h
p Zv
max( , )p
Fermi correction
0.5
1
1.5
2
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
/ FT T
B Fk T
effv
Al (solid density)
h=1 eV
h=10 eV
h=100 eV
(>p)
log
eff
1 0.1 10 100 1000
Te (eV)
Maximum Temperature (Te) and Transmisson vs Intensity
100 fs pulse of38 eV photons
50 nm Al foil
FLA
SH
20
06
550 eV
FLA
SH
20
06
Heating and expansion of 50 nm Al foil at 1015 W/cm2
38 eV photonsAl foil
Density Electron temperature
Al (T=300 K)100 nm
XUV
VUV transmission data as function of photon energyin cold Al compared with present model
L edge
plasmafrequency
presentmodel for T=300 K
Keenan et al. (2002)
Rus exp. 2006
DESY exp. 2006
DESY exp.
Berkeleytables
2B
DC 3 1/31.44
i
k Tme
n
13 1DC 10 s
Temperature (K)
Au
Exp
13 1DC 10 s
Temperature (K)
Ag
Exp
DC limit -> 0 of compares surprisingly well with data
obtained from measured electric and thermal conductivities
eff
Conclusions
• For VUV interaction with warm dense matter, the the Drude-Fermi description appears to be adequate, when combined with radiative Coulomb scattering appropriate for`slow electrons´, as derived by Krainov.
• A simple analytical expression is derived for the collision frequency, covering the full temperature range from solids to plasma and photons ranging from optical to X-rays.
• It is in reasonable agreement with existing data.
First Transmission ExperimentFirst Transmission Experiment
Measured by Measured by Sokolowski-Sokolowski-Tinten, Tinten, Tschentscher Tschentscher Krzywinski, Juha, Krzywinski, Juha, Sobierajski et alSobierajski et al
Deduced absorption length in cold AL: L=130 nm
Light propagation in plasma
p
k
p2 = 4e2n/m
plasma frequency
2 = p2 /(1+ie/) + k2 c2
dispersion relation
EL=E0 exp{ikr-it}
plane wave
(k2 - 2/c2) EL = (4i/c2) j
Maxwell equation
j = -enu
-iu = -(e/m) EL - eu
electron current
du/dt collisions
lightpropagates
reflection
0.5 1 1.5 2
11015
21015
31015
41015
51015
61015
71015
0.5
1
1.5
2
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
0.5
1
1.5
20
51015
11016
h=1 eV
h=10 eV
h=100 eV
log
eff
1 0.1 10 100 1000
Te (eV)
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
14.5
15
15.5
16
16.5
10 10001001
heV)
log
eff
300
K Te = 10 eV
Te = 1 keV
12
32 2
02/33
1 / 3
2 / 3
2 4
315 3
1 i
t
Z n Ew
pZ
Inverse bremsstrahlung rate for slow electrons (Krainov,J.Phys.B33,1585(2000))
12
32 2
02/33
1 / 3
2 / 3
2 4 2
3 215 3
1 i th
tth
Z n E pw
p pZ
1.32 ( , )F T h
( , ) 2
th F
F
p pF T h
p p
1/ 23
min , 1 for T 04 F F
T h
T
1 for T
Absorption by Inverse Bremsstrahlung
Z x
1p
2p
1 2( , )aR p p
x
1p
2p
Z
Photon emission rate (spontaneous)
2 1 2( , )spe ip p
dR p m n
d
Photon absorption rate
Total photon emission rate
1( )tot sh
pe peR R n
stimulatedemission
22 30
2
8 ph
Ecn
Photon number per quantum state
Rates are related by detailed balance
2 2
1 1
1 2
1
2 1
2
1
( , ) ( )
( , ) ( )
ph
aphsp
e
E E
E E
p p dZ d
p p dZ d n
R pn
R p
1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2( , ) ( , ) ( , )tot sp spa ph e ph ep p p p p p p pR n R n R
absorption stim. emission
total absorption
Total photon emission rate
1( )tot sh
pe peR R n
stimulatedemission
22 30
2
8 ph
Ecn
Photon number per quantum state
Photon absorption by inverse Bremsstrahlung
Photon absorption rate:
'eppB uStimulated emission rate:
'appB u
20/ 2 / 8du E
(radiation energy density)
Detailed balance(Einstein relations)
3 2' 0
3' 8
epp
pp
B u c E
A d
' 'e app p pB B
2
3 2
( ) /64 '( ', )
3 ( ') (1 exp( 2 '))(exp( 2 ) 1)
d F dp dd p p
c p p p
Spontaneous photon emission rate:
' ( ', )pp iA pn d p p
Bremsstrahlung cross-section:
XFEL Heating with 3 keV photons
Specific energy deposited:
e(J/g) = (cm2/g) I(W/cm2) (s)
100fsI = 1014 -1018 W/cm2
3.1 keV photons
e = 104 -108 J/gcm2/ggold opacity
1 keV 5 Gbar
Collosional absorption wave vector (from dispersion relation)
light intensity
absorption coefficient (e)
2
2 2 2
1
1 /
pe
pc
2
2
11
1 / 2p
re
k k ic i
I ~ |E |2 ~ exp(-x)
Unique feature: Explore absolute peak of photo-absorption in solid-density matter
ph
oto
-ab
sorp
tion
photo-ionisationLaser
Electrons
nc
10 100 10001h (eV)
as a function ofphoton energy
ph
oto
-ab
sorp
tion
10 100 10001T (eV)
plasmasolid
TTFermi
as a function oftemperature
Foils as Ultra-Fast Switches
1810 W/cm2h = 30 eV
50 nm Al foil
1.0
0.0
0.5
transmission
absorptionreflection
6 fs
0 10 20time (fs)