Upload
judge-florentino-floro
View
369
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention andUrgent Omnibus Motions – G.R. No. 199034
Citation preview
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Supreme Court of the Philippines
En Banc - M A N I L A
GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO, Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199034Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al., Respondents.X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -XJOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO,Petitioner, -versus- G.R. No. 199046Hon. LEILA M. DE LIMA, et al.,Respondents.X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -XJUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., (C/o Engr. Benjamin V. Floro, #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan City, 3020 Bulacan; incumbent De Jure RTC, Br. 73, Malabon Presiding Judge by virtue of SC En Banc Resolution dated 12 April, 2011 and Destiny vis-à-vis Fate & Faith )Petitioner-in-Intervention. For: Intervention, etc.
X-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention and Urgent Omnibus Motions –
I. For Leave of Court, to Docket, Admit and Grant Petitioner’s Intervention Case, and Motion for Leave of Court to Pay Docket- Legal Fees; and in the Alternative, to Waive Payment of Docket Fees and Permit Intevenor to Litigate as Pauper (having been Jobless Judge in pretend world since July 20, 1999, the longest suspension in history or 12 years and 3 months),
II. To Note, Consider and Include in the Judgment, Petitioner’s Letter-Concurring and Dissenting Opinion (which Predicts the Fate, Faith & Destiny of PGMA and this Honorable Court vis-à-vis the P-Noy Presidency [WE, with bated breath, await “the”/“its” Termination, that is, the Prophet says (per the Ultimate Pink and Violet Lights, He is not pre-destined to finish his term!): this is impeccably foretold in the SC Twin (Intervention) Pleadings (Annexes “A, A-1”) filed by Judge Floro on February 4 & March 5, 2010 (in G.R. No. 191002, etc., Arturo M. de Castro vs. JBC, et al.; inscribed therein is the foretold Prophecy on the Faith / Fate of President GMA, her Successor, P-Noy, the Chief Justice and the Forthcoming Dire Pains, Horrible Deaths, Famine, Disasters, Suicides, Accidents, Global Millennium Earthquakes, inter alia,
1
vis-à-vis the 38 Visions-Apparitions of/to Judge Floro of the Blue Madonna, etc. vis-a-vis this standoff case ),
Download this Pleading:
Chief Justice Renato C. Corona, and the MEMBERS, En Banc, Supreme Court, Padre Faura, Manila.
Your Honors,
COMES NOW, the undersigned petitioner-in-intervention, Judge
Florentino V. Floro, Jr. (hereinafter referred to as intervenor "Judge Floro,"
for brevity), as concerned citizen, taxpayer and litigant, by himself and for
himself, AND WITH LEAVE OF COURT, most respectfully states:
Opening Statement
Respondents, in the (legal) battle field: Terrorizing the Supreme Court
Legal and virtual NONSENSE : (Like-a-goldfish Filipino TV News Host)
Arnold Clavio remarked that Tele Novelas (like “Amaya” and “Kokak” would
end soon due to the prime time 24/7 soap opera called “Gloria and Di-Lema”.
The respondents are continuously intimidating not only the Supreme
Court Justices but even the entire Judicial Department, saying, that they will
dance “Tinikling” in the streets and would make “Sumbong” to their Gods, if
the petitioner PGMA will stubbornly and repeatedly violate the copyright law
[by making “Putong” upon her neck to head, the 3 kilos metal brace-Crown
(which is, but a duplicate of Minita Viray Chico Nazario’s Damocles Sword
hanging on Judge Floro’s head since July 20, 1999, when her Honor, Flerida
Ruth-Romero, as her swan song signed the CURSED SC Resolution suspending
the 3 mystic dwarves LUIS, Armand and Angel, for ordering Judge Floro to
inflict illness, horrible, slow and painful deaths, car accidents, mystic fires and
even psychic suicides upon his crab mentality “enemigos”)].
Sino po ba namang Pilipino ang hindi matatakot! Kahit sa karsada,
mabubulagta ka na lang: a) on October 7, 2011, about 11:00 a.m., the son of ex-
SC Justice Jose Vitug, at the Padre Faura main road, told me that cancer healer
2
nun, Sister Raquel Reodica, RVM, miserably failed to heal the metastasis
(cancer) of his sister-in-law, “tepok” daw; and b) when I asked the chief of
staff [of ex-JBC Member Atty. J. Conrado Parado Castro (who was abducted by
the space ship of LUIS on the Super Moon dawn of 4:00 a.m. to Neverland at
the 3 duendes’ Kingdom at Osaka, Japan and Jupiter)] to receive copy of my
Motion for Reinstatement (for her new “amo” JBC Member MARIA
MILAGROS FERNAN-CAYOSA), I did sense that she was so afraid of the
epidemic encircling the Court’s corridors of power; she stated that Fridays
Healing Masses are being held for my Ateneo Law School Class 1982
classmate DCA Nimfa Cuesta-Vilches afflicted with Pancreas Stage IV
(metastasis), one of the most dreaded illness.
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion
FLORO, J.:
The Prophecy: (Not) Strictly Politics - Vengahan ng Vengahan, Open
Display of Power, Fate-Survival of Benigno Simeon Cojuanco Aquino III,
Physical Hurting of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (Coinciding with
her Irreversible Downfall on the 5th of November, 2011, the 58th Natal Day
of Mystic Judge Florentino Floro, who was bestowed on that day the
Ultimate Pink Lights, the most powerful in the entire universe in addition
to the Ultimate Violet light of Annihilation) and the Faith/Suffering of the
Filipino Nation vis-à-vis Conditional Global Annihilation, 1999-2012.
When Judge Floro's 12 years suspension case (A.M. No. RTJ-99-1460,
"OCAD vs. Judge Florentino Floro") was called (on the morning of April 12,
2011, or just 11 days from April 1, 2011 when his “Supplemental Omnibus
Motion for Reinstatement”, inter alia” was filed, and exactly 5 years and 3
hours after Luzviminda Delgado Puno died in pain at St. Luke's Hospital, just 5
days after the Court released the March 31, 2006 promulgated Cursed Minita
Viray Chico-Nazario 75 pages "Psychosis" dwarf Judgement), it was clear that
not one among the members of this Court was suggesting that that intervenor
3
Judge Floro has no constitutional rights that this Court must vigilantly protect.
No one was saying that Judge Floro should not be granted any remedy. The
bone of contention before the Court was, simply, whether to allow Judge Floro
his right to due process by giving him the right to continue in office as de jure
Judge or to accept his alternative and conditional offer of resignation after full
reinstatement, with full payment of back wages, economic and other legal
benefits, under the law and settled jurisprudence. On this matter, the vote of this
Court was unaminous (Annex I), as the SC En Banc Resolution of April 12,
2011, did GRANT Judge Floro's "Supplemental Omnibus Motion for
Reinstatement, inter alia" dated 1 April, 2011(Annex II).
A. The Right of the State to be Heard
versus the Right Claimed by
Petitioners vis-a-vis the Mystic
Curse of the 3 duendes, LUIS,
Armand and Angel (12 years
longest suspension in world history
– Ultimate Pink & Violet Light,
from Jupiter & Osaka, Japan)
The Rules of Court and jurisprudence prescribe very stringent
requirements before a Judge can be suspended or removed from service.
Among these is the requirement under A.M. NO. 01-8-10-SC that Judges of
lower courts can only be displined after the requirements of filing of complaint,
answer, investigation and reports are duly complied with by the OCAD.
A Complaint or Memorandum Report (filed by Justice Alfredo L.
Benipayo et al., who is now suffering the massive stroke) that contained false
charges can have many consequences among which are: (a) the co-conspirators
can suffer cancer or massive stroke, inter alia, under the Golden Rule of
Karma, (b) the person making the false testimony can be punished under the
"curse" jurisprudence for contempt of the 3 duendes, placing a stain in their
blood up to the 4th generation and (c) the person making the false submissions
4
can be punished by abduction of outer space ships resulting to car accidents,
horrible, slow and painful deaths, including psychic suicides.
On December 8, 1998, Judge Floro displayed in his Br. 73, RTC,
Malabon sala the written prediction of “Erap will not finish his term” (Annex
D). This written document is just 6 meters beside the Br. 74, RTC, Malabon
Sala of Judge, now SC Justice Bienvenido L. Reyes. Ponente, Justice Minita
Viray Chico-Nazario ruled:
"xxx. It is weird for respondent Judge to state in one of his pleadings in
this case that President Estrada would not finish his term as President.
It is unusual and queer of him to state in his calling card that he is a
graduate of Ateneo de Manila, second honors, bar topnotcher with a
grade of 87.55%. xxx. As narrated by the audit team, Judge Floro was
circulating calling cards bearing his name as the Presiding Judge of
RTC, Branch 73, Malabon City, and indicating therein that he is a "bar
exams topnotcher (87.55%)" and with "full second honors" from the
Ateneo de Manila University, A.B. and LL.B. xxx.”
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/mar2006/am_rtj-99-
1460_2006.html (“OCAD vs. Judge Floro”)
On October 10, 2000, Judge Floro, upon cross-examination questions by
witness and by Acting Investigator Romulo S. Quimbo, replied that “Erap will
remain this year, but next year (2001) he will not finish his term! (Annex “M,
M-1”).
On January 9, 1999, 6:00 a.m., the feast of the Black Nazarene of
Quiapo, Manila, Judge Floro was bestowed the divine vision of a), b) global
apparitions of the Virgin Mary and global millennium earthquakes from 1999-
2012, and c) VP Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo would be badly hurt. On the 3rd
Friday of June, 2001, Judge Floro released this prophecy, entitled “The Gifts of
Prophecy and Spiritual Healing dated Good Friday”, 13 April 2001, Annex D-
1) to SC Justice Consuelo Ynares-Santiago (the mastermind of Judge Floro’s
dismissal according to Atty. Mario Ongkiko, and) soon afer Erap failed to finish
5
his term on January 20, 2001. Forthwith, petitioner PGMA suffered her 1 st
hurting: “GMA, hurting, alarmed” (Annex D-2, PDI: the Marcelo scam,
December 8, 2001).
On June 20, 2003, Judge Floro filed his “C.J. Davide Impeachment”
Motion to Lift Suspension, inscribing therein the prophecy of the fate of
PGMA, FVR & Jose de Venecia (Annexes H, H-1 & H-2). Judge Floro
repeatedly inserted in his 2003-2004, Motions to Lift Suspension (among the
more than 60 Motions to Lift Longest Cursed Suspension he filed), the
irreversible downfall of PGMA which would coincide with her physical
hurting.
On August 29, 2003, Judge Floro undertook his 7 th journey to Paoay,
Ilocos Norte and stood still 7 meters off the very name “Conchita Claudio
Carpio” plate hanging at the house of Don Lucas Carpio and cursed the entire
place and house (Annex “L-3”). He filed the nth Motion to Lift Suspension
asking the Ponente SC Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales to grant Judge Floro
plain mercy. Judge Floro, in his 6th Journey to Paoay, predicted the appointment
of both Morales and Callejo on August, 2002 (Annex C).
On December 7, 2003, Judge Floro wrote his DOS MIL TRES
PROPHECY of “Visions of Pains” dated 7 December, 2003 Motion to Lift
Suspension (Annex I).
Judge Floro, on June, 2004, intervened in the certiorari lawsuit
regarding the opposition Koalisyon ng Nagkakaisang Pilipino (KNP) per Davao
City Rep. Ruy Elias Lopez, to stop a joint session of Congress from canvassing
the votes for president and vice president. Floro asked the Court to declare a
failure of elections and order the COMELEC to conduct special presidential
elections. Floro also asked the Supreme Court to declare Noli de Castro as
acting President, as Solomonic solution to the political crisis.
In the Fernando Poe, Jr. presidential candidate disqualification case,
Floro was reported as "Espiritistang Judge Ididipensa si Da King." (Bagong
6
Tiktik February 17, 2004), "Psychic Phenomena gagamitin sa FPJ Case."
Manila Standard Today, on February 24, 2004, reported - "Poesition" papers
were submitted by intervenor Judge Florentino Floro for FPJ, and by his
classmate Victorino Fournier against FPJ for his disqualification.
Judge Floro repeatedly wrote in the FPJ pleadings: "Bago na ang
Presidente sa 2004!" (this predictions was repeatedly written in more than 2
Motion to Lift Suspension filed on 2003)(G.R. No. 161434, March 3, 2004,
Tecson vs. Comelec). Ominous sign: before the start of the oral argument,
Tecson passed 7 inches off Judge Floro - On September 28, 2007, 8:30 p.m,
Senior Superintendent Francisco Uyami, Pasig police chief stated that Maria
Jeanette Tecson, 40, a lawyer, was found dead (in a state of rigor mortis) inside
room 204 at the Richmond Hotel, San Miguel Avenue, Pasig City (with her
throat slit and with cuts on her wrist).
B. Respondent's Counsel, Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz,
Solicitor General, Must Explain Why He Is
Claiming That The State's Constitutional
Right Is Being Violated, When The 2003
Claimed Violation By Judge Floro Was
Caused By His Own IBP Administrative
Issuance-Denial Of Judge Floro's On Bended
Knees Letters-Appeals for Justice I & II
On September 10 & 19, 2003, Judge Floro repeatedly asked IBP President
Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz, for audience. Cadiz refused and failed to grant mercy to
the on bended knees plea for compassion of Judge Floro. Judge Floro filed the
“Letters Appeals for Justice I & II” (“Annex J, K”). Judge Floro merely asked
the IBP to write to the Court to decide Judge Floro’s case, just that. Cadiz
passed by Judge Floro, 2 meters off, and never gave the dwarf Judge a damn
chance to be heard. An IBP Resolution denying Judge Floro’s Appeal was
issued and mailed to Judge Floro. The 3 duendes burned them and cursed the
IBP Presidency.
7
To a certain degree, the doctrine on equitable estoppel should guide the
hand of this Solicitor. In its simplest sense, estoppel prevents a Cadiz from
disclaiming his previous act, to the prejudice of Judge Floro who relied on the
representations created by such previous act: “E, 2 klase ba ang batayan ng
Hustisya? Kapag may 3 duende ka, di ka papatulan ng IBP? E, worst, it was
the guiding palms of Pura Angelica Santiago, the daughter of SC Justice
Ynares-Santiago, who did influence Anselmo in ruling negative for the duende
Judge. Multo ng Legal Karma sa kaniyang opisina, bilang successor ng
pinakamalupit na OCAD Adminstrator at former SolGen Alfredo Logronio
Benipayo, and takot na bumabalot sa puso niya! ", remarked Judge Floro. “The
logic behind the doctrine comes from the common societal value that a person
must not be allowed to profit from his own wrong", wrote MARIA LOURDES
P. A. SERENO, Associate Justice (dissenting opinion, in these cases). Put
differently, the 3 dwarves did cast a mystic imprecation upon the Office of the
Solicitor General way back when Benipayo was in bad health thereat. For now,
and just for this time, to use same argument against Petitioner PGMA must
necessarily fail.
Thus, the acts which respondent’s counsel, Cadiz, claims to have
violated the State’s constitutional rights are the acts of its Solicitor, and
consequently, its own, under the rule on temporal punishment under Canon Law
and the Law of Moses, including the 3 immutable laws of curse, karma and
spell of the 3 duendes.
[Judge Floro also filed on bended knees “Letters-Appeals” that his case be
decided by the Court, to a) the PJA, dated September 5 & October 23, 2003, 1 st
& 2nd Letters-Appeals, and b) the Ateneo, ALAFI, dated September 19, 2003,
Annexes “K, L-1, L ”].
C. The Ponente Chico-Nazario Faced The Risk Of
"Divine Retribution" Frontally, And Failed To
Ensure The 3 Duendes That She Was Not
Unduly Favoring Davide, Jr., Teresita
8
Cruz-Sison & Alfredo L. Benipayo To
The Prejudice Of The Mystic-Jobless Judge,
And To Have Done This, She Failed to Allow
The Helpless Magistrate To Be Heard Before
The Cursed Dismissal Judgment & Appeals.
The court cannot evade the question that is uppermost in the minds of
many – is the Chico-Nazario 75 pages Judgment a good or bad law? Was it
driven by Atty. Teresita Cruz-Sison’s desire to get even, after Judge Floro did
predict her massive stroke before JBC Member Justice Campos and published
to Dr. Cecilia Villegas, Psychiatrist, on September 19, 1998? Why did C.J.
Davide, Jr. opted to consult "Spirit Questors" regarding the recurring and
lingering illnesses of his brothers Jorge and Jose, who both died on 2004,
including the never ending pain of his father Hilario, Sr. who died after the
dwarf Decision was released, because of the Decision of the Avengers, LUIS,
Armand and Angel? Why did Alfredo Logronio Benipayo evade the
investigatory and judicial process (2 disbarment cases filed by Judge Floro
against them as co-conspirators) regarding their liabilities for certain alleged
criminal acts? If the risk of flight, then, by petitioner PGMA is high, then this
Court must adopt either of the following approaches: (1) grant the right to
travel, and (2) to allow prosecution after the term of P-Noy, just these options,
nothing more, period. Petitioner PGMA cannot obtain justice from the
Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan, during the P-Noy term, for her investigation
and trial would be moro-moro, a farce, so to speak.
On November 3, 2006, Judge Floro filed with the Court and submitted an
Original pleading with the Office of Justice Nazario Biblically Imprecating the
Justices based on Psalms 109 and 73 (PDI, “Psychotic Judge enlists help of 3
dwarfs against SC”, Annex “G”.
On December, 2006, Judge Floro wrote and published his first book, when
he wrote the death of Rod Nazario, inter alia, on page 359 (Annex “F”): “LUIS
to Nazario: Mark my work, she will regret it!” Forthwith, Rod Nazario,
9
husband of Justice Minita suffered heart by-pass and was inflicted cancer by the
3 duendes on 2007, expiring on September 23, 2009 due to metastasis, or Stage
IV Cancer.
On December 14-20, 2006, Judge Floro, on bended knees filed several
applications for work, job and trabajo, to the offices of: his classmates, Rene
Tale, DOJ Rene Tale, DOJ Leo Dacer III+, Usec. Atty. Manuel Gaite, Mayor
Jerry P. Trenas, State Counsel, respondent Ricardo Paras III; and based on the
Letter of Exec. Sec. E. Ermita’s, E. Perez, Judge Floro, filed many letters
searching for work to the offices of Cerge M. Remonde, Margarito B. Teves,
Raul M. Gonzalez, Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Alberto G. Romulo, Sen. Kiko
Pangilinan, Sen. Jamby A.S. Madrigal, Sen. Manny Villar, President Erap
Estrada per Cong. JV Bautista; all these were done, after Judge Floro’s requests
for Job, were turned down by his own counsel, Rene AV Saguisag and Comelec
Chair Benjamin Abalos (Annexes “E, E-1 to E-8”).
Fortunately, all of them or their loved ones did suffer what petitioner
PGMA is suffering now, in one way or another, depending on the dish or menu
of the 3 duendes. Put differently, a revolving health curse is caused by the
ultimate Violet light of LUIS, the King of kings of elementals in the universe.
“Florentino says he predicted Joseph "Erap" Estrada's
presidential downfall and prayed that present incumbent
Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would survive her endless political
battles. Looking ahead, he reckons Arroyo's power will end
soon and the nation will suffer as a result.”
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?
pp_cat=30&art_id=26375&sid=9641493&con_type=3
Florentino and the three dwarves, Saturday, September 02, 2006, The
Standard, Hong Kong (Annex “__”).
10
IN VIEW THEREOF , I vote to: (a) grant the right to travel, and (b) to
allow prosecution of PGMA after the term of P-Noy, just these options, nothing
more, nothing less, period. Petitioner PGMA cannot obtain justice from the
Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan, during P-Noy’s term, for her investigation
and trial would be moro-moro, a farce, so to speak.
Attribution: The format and many sentences were borrowed from the
Dissenting Opinion of Justice Sereno. Judge Floro states that this pleading, like
all his pleading since 1996, are all CODED (writen in cryptology, that is, the
secret events that will happen are inserted therein via the ultimate Violet lights).
Motion to Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution
(upholding the DOJ-Comelec panel report)-Election Sabotage Charges
dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18
November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas.
Urgent Motions – a) to Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC,
Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-
Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and b) to Join-Add-Consolidate
all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts
or Tribunals in these consolidated cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent
powers of courts), to prevent mockery of justice, and multiplicty of suits.
On November 18, 2011, at 10:00 p.m. Senate President Juan Ponce
Enrile delivered a long lecture upon Pastor Quibuloy, live via Channel 39.
Enrile said the the Supreme Court has the final say on the case of PGMA. He is
partly true, since Judge Floro already wrote the Prophecy and Fate both of
PGMA, P-Noy vis-à-vis the High Tribunal in his Intervention in the landmark
cases of “Arturo M. De Castro vs. JBC, et al.” (February, 2010, Annexes I, II).
Enrile added that the Executive and Judicial Departments must coordinate, and
he remarked that there must be a reaching out between the President and the
Chief Justice.
11
Such reaching out can happen only in land of fruits and nuts. For it is
written by the Prophet and Angel of Death, that only the Ultimate Violet Light
of LUIS, which is being flashed, solely pens the past, present and future in this
drama anthology. Not even the stars and the moon can inscribe any chapter of
this legal standoff, wise or otherwise.
History teaches PGMA and her enemies how to play the game: a)
Marcial Bonifacio was used by Ninoy against Marcos, but the former was
slaughtered right at the place where PGMA did dream on November 15, 2011
to fly high to Singapore and conduct her psychic travels to other parts of the
planet to evade punishment. In other words, she is arguing against her destiny,
which was already carved by Judge Floro, way back in 2003-2005, when the
JBC repeatedly, that is, 7 times nominated Justice Alfredo L. Benipayo. Judge
Floro repeatedly filed Motions to Lift Suspension and told the Court:
“The nomination of Benipayo by the JBC and the submission of his
name to the President initiate the downfall of the 14 th President or
rather the 15th, since FPJ is the de jure …!”
At this juncture, Judge Floro requests this Court to take judicial notice of
the fact that his 91% in Criminal Law Procedure (under Dean Antonio L.
Gregorio, Ateneo Law School, Annex “____”) is a standing 10 years unbroken
record (from 1975-1985 by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians) qualifies him to be
considered a legal luminary in the field of Criminal Procedure. With that, Judge
Floro writes the following master thesis on the gross ignorance of the law and
gross misconduct of Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas vis-à-vis the
mockery of judicial process by some Members of the COMELEC En Banc.
This Court, in the case of Demetria, formulated the rule that mere
newpaper reports can be the basis of administrative case against Magistrates.
[EN BANC, A.M. No. 00-7-09-CA. December 19, 2001, In Re: Derogatory
News Items Charging Court of Appeals Associate Justice Demetrio G. Demetria
with Interference on Behalf of a Suspected Drug Queen: Yu Yuk Lai
12
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2001/dec2001/am_00_7_09_ca.htm]
The following news reports (on the fact and timeline of COMELEC
En Banc Resolution upholding the DOJ-Comelec panel report-Election
Sabotage Charges dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest
dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus
Mupas) are set forth, to prove - that what Brillantes and Mupas did, are not only
a) gross violations of their Lawyer’s Oath of Office (“to do justice to every
man”), but their actuations rendered the b) Charges, the Orders and Warrants of
Arrests, as 100% scraps of papers, duly cursed. A law student from Harvard
Law School at Pampanga, coached by a smart Ateneo Law School Class 1982,
another Blue Eagle, with Royal Blood, can easily comprehend these “balita”:
“Crown o’ thorns” - this “Minerva brace” should be worn for three months, St.
Luke Hospital doctors say. In his 1967 essay “Tyranny of the Urgent,” Charles
Hummel warned: “Our greatest danger is letting urgent things crowd out the
important.”
Timeline – Judicial Sabotage
“The Commission on Elections decided, by a 5-to-2 vote, to file poll
sabotage charges against GMA.”
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96741/time-of-visitation-spurned
Time of visitation spurned?
By Juan Mercado Cebu Daily News Saturday, November 19th, 2011
*****
“PGMA lawyers just filed an urgent motion questioning the jurisdiction
(of the Pasay City Regional Trial Court) and that’s the first thing that should be
hurdled first. They said the charges should be have been filed before the
Ombudsman and the Sandiganbayan, taking into consideration that Arroyo is a
government official.
13
Even before the warrant was issued, it would be impossible for the judge
to read the charge in two days. The judge would have to be a “superman” to be
able to read the entire document filed by the DOJ-Comelec panel.”
http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?
articleId=749721&publicationSubCategoryId=63
GMA camp denounces railroading
By Paolo Romero (The Philippine Star) November 19, 2011
*****
"The Comelec also railroaded its own resolution because
Commissioner [Armando] Velasco had said that he took no part because he
wanted time to study the joint panel resolution before voting. That meant the
Comelec voted to charge Mrs. Arroyo with electoral sabotage even without
reading the joint panel resolution. The Comelec ruling was highly questionable
since the credibility of Comelec chairman Sixto Brillantes and Justice Secretary
Leila de Lima was suspect, considering they were lawyers for the opposition
during the Arroyo administration.”
http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideNews.htm?f=2011/november/19/
news6.isx&d=2011/november/19
Gloria allies question Comelec’s intensions by Maricel Cruz, Saturday,
November 19, 2011
*****
"It was impossible for a judge to assess and render a decision on the
charges within one day. This recommendation of the Comelec has to be
presented in court which will carry out its own assessment and analysis to
judicially determine the existence of probable cause. The evidence is so thick
that even the two commissioners (of the Comelec) were not able to finish
reading it.
As it happens, Pasay RTC Judge Jesus Mupas, to whom the case was
raffled, ordered the arrest of Arroyo at 4.30 p.m. Police went to St. Luke’s
14
Hospital in Taguig City where Arroyo is confined and served the arrest warrant
at 6.30 p.m.
The Comelec had set a meeting at 9 a.m. or two hours before the SC en
banc. The independence of the Comelec, an independent constitutional body,
had been tarnished for taking part in the “railroading” of the case.
“They filed these charges in this court simply as a matter of expediency in
order to obtain the arrest warrant. This is a clear violation of the president’s
human rights by this government.”
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96617/gloria-arroyo-lawyers-moro-moro-de-lima-
justice-served
Gloria Arroyo lawyers: ‘Moro-moro’; De Lima: Justice served
By Christian V. Esguerra, Niña Calleja Philippine Daily Inquirer Saturday,
November 19th, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/world/asia/philippines-arrests-ex-
president-gloria-macapagal-arroyo.html
Philippines’ Ex-President Is Arrested on Fraud Charges
By FLOYD WHALEY November 18, 2011
*****
November 18, 2011
7 a.m. - "And though he was reportedly sick Comelec Chairman Sixto
Brillantes left the hospital to preside over an en banc session. Brillantes called
for an emergency meeting at 7 a.m. on Friday and the resolution was approved
by a vote of 5 to 2. Commissioners Armando Velasco and Lucenito Tagle, both
Arroyo appointees, abstained from the vote. Velasco said there wasn't enough
time to make an informed decision. “I'm not yet ready to decide on the merits
kasi nakikita ko voluminous ‘yung records kaya mahirap naman na pabigla-
bigla ang desisyon,”said Velasco.
Tagle only saw the Department of Justice (DOJ)-Comelec panel report
earlier Friday. He wonders why an emergency meeting was called only hours
before the Supreme Court tackled the Arroyo travel issue. “We preempted the
Supreme Court, dapat hinantay muna,” said Tagle.
But Comelec Commissioner Rene Sarmiento admitted that the
possibility of former President Arroyo leaving the country forced their hand.
15
“May manifest attempt to leave the country so this was factored by the en banc.
So we have to resolve right away ‘yung kaso,” said Sarmiento."
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/comelec-possibility-gma-flight-
forced-decision
Comelec: Possibility of GMA flight forced decision
by Anthony Taberna, ABS-CBN News 11/18/2011
*****
11:26 a.m. – The Comelec-DOJ panel investigating the alleged massive
election cheating in the 2007 senatorial elections filed election sabotage
charges against former President Arroyo, former Maguindanao Governor
Andal Ampatuan Sr. and former Comelec election supervisor Lintang Bedol.
The Comelec asked for a hold departure order against the three.
11:54 a.m. – Comelec Chairman Sixto Brillantes Jr. said the poll body did not
rush in deciding to file the electoral sabotage charges. He said the joint panel’s
recommendations were received by the Commission on Nov. 16.
12:12 p.m. – Electoral sabotage case was raffled off to RTC Branch 112 Pasay
Judge Jesus Mupas.
1:16 p.m. – The high court, voting 8-5 in a special en banc session, stays and
reiterates the TRO it issued last Tuesday.
3:25 p.m. – Lacierda said the TRO is not yet final and executory because
Arroyo’s legal team has yet to comply with some conditions stated in the TRO.
4:04 p.m. – Pasay Regional Trial Court Judge Br. 112, Jesus Mupas found
probable cause in the complaint filed in his sala and issued warrants of arrest
against Arroyo, Ampatuan, and Bedol.
4:09 p.m. – Pasay court turned over arrest warrants to the Pasay City police.
National Capital Region Police Director then ordered the Southern Police
District to serve the warrants of arrest on Arroyo at the St. Luke’s Medical
Center in Bonifacio Global City, Ampatuan at the Bicutan detention facility,
and Bedol at the Philippine National Police (PNP) Custodial Center in Camp
Crame.
Atty. Joel Pelicano, Clerk of Court of Pasay RTC 112, said Judge Jesus
Mupas found probable cause after Arroyo was charged with electoral sabotage
by the Commission Elections (Comelec). “Kapag may kaso na isinampa at na-
16
raffle sa isang branch, ang gagawin ng husgado ay alamin kung may existence
of probable cause to issue a warrant of arrest for the court to acquire
jurisdiction over the person of the accused,” explained Pelicano.
Pelicano said a hold departure order (HDO) is only a motion and will be
issued if found meritorious by the court. He said the issuance of a HDO will be
deliberated on Monday.
Meanwhile, the Arroyo camp filed an urgent omnibus motion to hold in
abeyance the issuance of warrant of arrest against the former president.
However, Judge Mupas had already left when the motion was filed. The motion
will also be discussed on Monday.
Aside from the former President, Mupas also issued arrest warrants for
former Maguindanao Gov. Andal Ampatuan Sr. and former election supervisor
Lintang Bedol Friday morning.
-- Report from Dexter Ganibe, radio dzMM
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/metro-manila/11/18/11/nothing-unusual-
gma-arrest-warrant-court
Nothing unusual with GMA arrest warrant: court
abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011
*****
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo has asked the Pasay Regional
Trial Court (RTC) to suspend its proceedings on the electoral sabotage case
filed against her, saying the Sandiganbayan, and not the RTC, should have
jurisdiction over the case.
The Arroyo camp filed a consolidated and urgent motion before the
sala of Pasay RTC 112 Judge Jesus Mupas, asking the court to suspend the
proceedings and objecting to the judge's issuance of an arrest warrant against
Arroyo. The motion noted that the anti-graft court, Sandiganbayan, should have
jurisdiction over the case considering that Arroyo was a public official when
the alleged crimes were committed. It also objected to the issuance of an arrest
warrant, saying Arroyo's right to due process was violated by the arrest order.
The NBI team is using unmarked vehicles to make the trip from Manila to
Taguig City.
17
Lambino said that the case should have been lodged before the
Sandiganbayan because Mrs. Arroyo, who is now serving as representative of
Pampanga's 2nd district, is a public official.
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/gma-files-objection-arrest-
warrant
GMA files objection to arrest warrant
abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011 11:44 AM
*****
4:25 p.m. – Justice Secretary Leila de Lima said Mrs. Arroyo is compelled to
remain in the country to face electoral sabotage charges.
4:33 p.m. – Arroyo decided not to proceed to the NAIA, canceled Singapore
Airlines flight reservations.
6:30 p.m. – Arroyo was arrested on electoral sabotage charges filed before the
Pasay Regional Trial Court by the Comelec and DOJ.
- Sr. Supt. James Bucayu led the Southern Police District (SPD) team that
served the warrant of arrest on the former President while she lay on the
hospital bed in St. Luke’s Medical Center in Taguig.
- In the hospital room was the former First Gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo and
Arroyo’s legal team. The SPD posted two personnel outside the hospital room
to stand guard and keep Arroyo in police custody.
- Bucayu said the arresting team read the contents of the arrest warrant to
Arroyo who, upon her lawyers’ advice, waived the reading of the former
President’s rights as an accused in a criminal case—also known as Miranda
rights.
- Bucayu also said the other steps in the booking process, including the taking
of the mug shots and fingerprinting will be done the next day at the hospital at a
convenient time for the former President.
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/239005/nation/ex-pres-arroyo-arrested-timeline-
of-day-that-was
Ex-Pres. Arroyo arrested: Timeline of day that was
11/18/2011
*****
18
“University of the Philippines Professor Prospero de Vera and political
strategist Malou Tiquia told ANC that what happened on Friday shows the
country still has a weak democracy. They believe that the filing of a court case
against Arroyo was rushed just to prevent her from traveling abroad. "The
political spectacle and telenovela is a sad commentary on our political
institutions and worst on our political leaders," de Vera said. "This is the worst
phase of democracy... the way it should not be. "Unfortunately because of the
decision of executive, they had to end up to potential crisis situation, even
ordinary citizens are divided," she said. "Napaka-dangerous nangyari."
Senator Francis Escudero agrees that due process was followed, but
he thinks the timing of the electoral sabotage case is questionable.
Senator Edgardo Angara, meanwhile, believes that the government is defying
the Supreme Court's decision. "Dapat ang sinunod dito ay ang mataas na korte
at hindi ang lower court," he said. The case filed by the joint Commission on
Elections and Department of Justice panel in Pasay appeared as an
“afterthought” in the face of the legal argument Arroyo could not be barred
from leaving without being formally charged in court. The panel was hoping
that the Pasay Regional Trial Court would immediately issue an arrest warrant
against the ex-President, who is facing a nonbailable offense. “You cannot cure
an unauthorized ban simply by filing a case after. It may be interpreted as an
afterthought,” Angara told reporters.
Asked if the RTC judge could issue a hold departure order on Arroyo
on the same day that the electoral sabotage case had been filed, Angara said in
Filipino: “I think it would be much of a harassment already if that happens.”
Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III hailed the SC en banc decision affirming its
TRO and requiring De Lima to show cause why she should not be cited in
contempt for defying its order. “The decision in favor of the right to travel is an
affirmation of the rule of law for all, without fear or favor,” he said. “I salute
the Supreme Court. I’m sure the executive department was expecting that. In
basketball, the DOJ is committing a violation called forcing through.”
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/96547/senators-divided-over-electoral-sabotage-
case-vs-arroyo
Senators divided over electoral sabotage case vs Arroyo
19
By Christian V. Esguerra Philippine Daily Inquirer Friday, November 18th,
2011
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/18/11/judiciary-executive-battle-
worries-analysts
Judiciary-executive battle worries analysts
abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/19/2011
*****
Gross misconduct, professional indiscretion and gross ignorance of the law.
“Rule 3.01, Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct mandates that a
judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence. Indeed,
competence and diligence are prerequisites to the due performance of judicial
office. 5 Section 3, Canon 6 of the New Code of Judicial Conduct requires
judges to maintain and enhance their knowledge and skills to properly perform
their judicial functions, thus:”
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/february2011/MTJ-09-1737.html
A.M. No. MTJ-09-1737 Conquilla vs Judge Bernardo February 9, 2011
*****
Petitioner additionally scores on the fact that respondent Sandiganbayan
issued the warrant for his arrest based solely on the 2nd June 1992 Resolution
of the Office of the Ombudsman and the 16th January 1995 Memorandum of the
Office of the Special Prosecutor. He has a point. The issuance of a warrant of
arrest is one of grave responsibility on the part of the issuing judge. While the
judge need not himself examine the complainant and his witnesses, he, however,
must personally evaluate the report and supporting documents submitted by the
prosecutor regarding the existence of probable cause and, only on the basis
thereof can he validly and correspondingly issue a warrant of arrest.
The judge may, if he finds it needful, require the submission of
additional affidavits of witnesses or papers to aid him in arriving at a
conclusion on the existence or absence of probable cause. In Ho vs.People, the
Court, positing that the issuing judge must have sufficient supporting
documents, besides the bare report of the prosecutor, upon which to make an
independent judgment, has said:
20
"x x x (T)he judge cannot rely solely on the report of the prosecutor in
finding probable cause to justify the issuance of a warrant of arrest. Obviously
and understandably, the contents of the prosecutor's report will support his own
conclusion that there is reason to charge the accused of an offense and hold
him for trial. However, the judge must decide independently. Hence, he must
have supporting evidence, other than the prosecutor's bare report, upon which
to legally sustain his own findings on the existence (or nonexistence) of
probable cause to issue an arrest order. This responsibility of determining
personally and independently the existence or nonexistence of probable cause is
lodged in him by no less than the most basic law of the land. Parenthetically,
the prosecutor could ease the burden of the judge and speed up the litigation
process by forwarding to the latter not only the information and his bare
resolution finding probable cause, but also so much of the records and the
evidence on hand as to enable His Honor to make his personal and separate
judicial finding on whether to issue a warrant of arrest."
The point is: he cannot rely solely and entirely on the prosecutor's
recommendation, as Respondent Court did in this case.
Although the prosecutor enjoys the legal presumption of regularity in the
performance of his official duties and functions, which in turn gives his report
the presumption of accuracy, the Constitution, we repeat, commands the judge
to personally determine probable cause in the issuance of warrants of arrest.
This Court has consistently held that a judge fails in his bounden duty if he
relies merely on the certification or the report of the investigating officer."
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1998/dec1998/134307_vitug.htm
CONCURRING OPINION, VITUG, J.:
Cojuangco Jr vs Sandiganbayan - J. Vitug's Opinion: 134307
*****
The judicial determination of probable cause, on the other hand, is one
made by the judge to ascertain whether a warrant of arrest should be issued
against the accused. The judge must satisfy himself that based on the evidence
submitted; there is necessity for placing the accused under custody in order not
to frustrate the ends of justice. If the judge finds no probable cause, the judge
cannot be forced to issue the arrest warrant.
21
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/june2009/171188.htm
June 19, 2009 People vs. Castillo, J. Quisimbing
*****
“Section 6(a), Rule 112 of the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure
clearly provides: SEC. 6. When warrant of arrest may issue. — (a) By the
Regional Trial Court. — Within ten (10) days from the filing of the complaint or
information, the judge shall personally evaluate the resolution of the prosecutor
and its supporting evidence. He may immediately dismiss the case if the
evidence on record clearly fails to establish probable cause. If he finds
probable cause, he shall issue a warrant of arrest, or a commitment order if the
accused has already been arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge
who conducted the preliminary investigation or when the complaint or
information was filed pursuant to section 7 of this Rule. In case of doubt on the
existence of probable cause, the judge may order the prosecutor to present
additional evidence within five (5) days from notice and the issue must be
resolved by the court within thirty (30) days from the filing of the complaint or
information.
Pursuant to the aforementioned provision, the RTC judge, upon the filing of an
Information, has the following options: (1) dismiss the case if the evidence on
record clearly failed to establish probable cause; (2) if he or she finds probable
cause, issue a warrant of arrest; and (3) in case of doubt as to the existence of
probable cause, order the prosecutor to present additional evidence within five
days from notice, the issue to be resolved by the court within thirty days from
the filing of the information.
It bears stressing that the judge is required to personally evaluate the
resolution of the prosecutor and its supporting evidence. He may immediately
dismiss the case if the evidence on record clearly fails to establish
probable cause.”
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/december2009/182336.htm
G.R. No. 182336, December 23, 2009, J. Nachura, Ong vs. Genio.
*****
The foregoing (timeline of) judicial sabotage was dramatically
performed by (the conspiracy of highest order in the dwarf Kingdom at Osaka,
22
Japan), Mupas & his Branch Clerk of Court, as Atty. Joel Pelicano, principals
by direct participation, and Brillantes, as co-conspirator.
How could RTC Judge Mupas have issued the Order of Arrest at 4:04
p.m. when the expediente from electronic raffle of 12:12 p.m. was delivered to
his sala about 12:30 p.m.? Even if Mupas did not read the records, still, it would
take more time to draft, type and finalize the Court Order.
OCAD Adminstrator Midas Marques should, therefore, be ordered by
the Court to sequester Mupas at Tagaytay, to attend Newly Appointed Judge’s
Seminars (on the Rules on Criminal Procedure and Legal Ethics).
The Judicial and Bar Council, on the other hand, on its legal conscience,
should issue a TRO valid for 10 years to prevent Mupas from applying for
promotion to the CA or Sandiganbayan.
COMELEC Chair Brillantes on the other hand, must be detained in the
Ospital ng Maynila, pending his review of the Rule 137, Rules of Court, on
Disqualifacation, lest the ghost of FPJ haunt him as it did make “takot” to Ben
Abalos, even if Jun Lozada failed to bewitch this golf pulot boy, who rose from
rags to riches because of his sweet tonque which regulary emits sugar lights,
unlike the eyes and palms of Judge Floro which emit mystic fires that burned
his Comelec Office, the Court of Appeals, RTC Malabon, MTC Muntinlupa
and the Session Hall of the Supreme Court, as the dwarves please.
“With admittedly eight volumes of evidence, affidavits and
documents submitted to the Regional Trial Court of Pasay City, it would
be a Herculean task to wade through the voluminous records and would
be physically impossible for a judge to determine probable cause in less
than four hours to justify the issuance of a warrant of arrest.” The judge
should not follow hook, line and sinker the prosecutor’s certification of a
probable cause. More is required by the constitution. The inordinate and
precipitate haste in the issuance of the warrant of arrest brazenly violates
Section 14 of the Bill of Rights which provides that ‘no person shall be held to
answer for a criminal offense without due process of law.”
23
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/11/20/11/lagman-hits-
%E2%80%9Cinordinate-haste%E2%80%9D-gma-arrest
Lagman hits “inordinate haste” in GMA arrest
abs-cbnNEWS.com 11/20/2011 11:56 AM
November 18, 2011
7 a.m. - "And though he was reportedly sick Comelec Chairman Sixto
Brillantes left the hospital to preside over an en banc session. Brillantes
called for an emergency meeting at 7 a.m. on Friday and the resolution
was approved by a vote of 5 to 2. Commissioners Armando Velasco and
Lucenito Tagle, both Arroyo appointees, abstained from the vote. Velasco
said there wasn't enough time to make an informed decision. “I'm not yet
ready to decide on the merits kasi nakikita ko voluminous ‘yung records
kaya mahirap naman na pabigla-bigla ang desisyon,”said Velasco.
11:26 a.m. – The Comelec-DOJ panel investigating the alleged massive
election cheating in the 2007 senatorial elections filed election sabotage
charges …
12:12 p.m. – Electoral sabotage case was raffled off to RTC Branch 112 Pasay
Judge Jesus Mupas.
4:04 p.m. – Pasay Regional Trial Court Judge Br. 112, Jesus Mupas found
probable cause in the complaint filed in his sala and issued warrants of arrest
against Arroyo, Ampatuan, and Bedol.
4:09 p.m. – Pasay court turned over arrest warrants to the Pasay City police.
National Capital Region Police Director then ordered the Southern Police
District to serve the warrants of arrest on Arroyo at the St. Luke’s Medical
Atty. Joel Pelicano, Clerk of Court of Pasay RTC 112, said Judge Jesus Mupas
found probable cause …
6:30 p.m. – Arroyo was arrested on electoral sabotage charges filed before the
Pasay Regional Trial Court by the Comelec and DOJ.
- Sr. Supt. James Bucayu led the Southern Police District (SPD) team that
served the warrant of arrest on the former President while she lay on the
hospital bed…
24
Nature of the Petition-in-intervention
Intervenor Judge Floro, in support of the instant pleading, cites Section 1, Rule 19 of the Rules of Court, which provides: “A person who has legal interest in the matter in litigation or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both, or is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in the custody of the court or of an officer thereof may, with leave of court, be allowed to intervene in the action. The court shall consider whether or not the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties, and whether or not the intervenor’s rights may be fully protected in a separate proceeding.”
Pursuant to the foregoing rule, this Honorable Court has repeatedly held that a motion for intervention shall be entertained when the following requisites are satisfied: (1) the would-be intervenor shows that he has a substantial right or interest in the case; and (2) such right or interest cannot be adequately pursued and protected in another proceeding. As concerned citizen, mystic judge, prophet, visionary, citizen and taxpayer, undersigned intervenor is also deemed to have the standing to raise the instant constitutional issued, for it is ruled in many cases, like in "Kilosbayan vs. Ermita and Gregory S. Ong,” G.R. No. 177721 that, "Petitioners have standing to file the suit simply as xxx taxpayers since the matter involves an issue of utmost and far-reaching Constitutional importance xxx. Standing has been accorded and recognized in similar instances.” (Vide: Francisco, Jr. v. The House of Representatives, G.R. No. 160261, November 10, 2003, 460 SCRA 830; Tatad v. Secretary of the Department of Energy, G.R. No. 124360, November 5, 1997, 281 SCRA 330; Gonzales vs. Narvasa, G. R. No. 140835. August 14, 2000).
The Legal Standing of the Petitioner & The Propriety of this Petition
As mystic judge, prophet, visionary, Petitioner filed this case as a taxpayer and concerned citizen of the Philippines, believing upon his compelling, prophetic and transcendental interest to intervene, based on the 1987 Constitution; further, intervenor has faith, that the current judicial controversy transcends the person, ambition and destiny of the Chief Justice, P-Noy and PGMA, because this matter has far-reaching implications in the quest of truth, justice, and dismissal of corruption. Furthermore, the resurrection of judicial independence, in particular, carries ominous significance in the life of this country. The Eternal Word Television Network of Mother Angelica proclaimed that “One who has access to truth and visions or apparitions and fails to share the same, is guilty of GUILT.” Judicial sabotage of the High Tribuanal and entire Judiciary (by Judge Mupas and COMELEC Chair Brillantes) utterly displays not only gross ignorance of the law, gross misconduct, professional incompetence and indiscretion, but their actuations, if not restrained and punished by this Court of Last Resort, will ultimately, and in no uncertain terms, enlarge in the greatest manner, under the law of karma and spell, the Ombudsman Curse.
25
Transcendental Grounds and Extraordinary Merits-Circumstances of Judge Floro’s Intervention, inter alia
The following evidence of the highest character is submitted in support of his intervention and nominations, thusly:
i) Judge Floro is a visionary, clairvoyant and prophet. He has accurately predicted in his “Angel of Death” 1996 and other editions, more than 800 dire prophecies with impeccability. Since 2008, he had been bestowed more than 38 visions and apparitions of the Virgin Mary and the Eucharist, with vivid images and unequivocal messages duly filed with this Court of last resort.1
ii) Judge Floro accurately predicted in writing the downfall of Erap, angioplasty and massive stroke of Justice Alfredo L. Benipayo, 5 Court Mystic Fires, surgery of Davide, Jr., with 2004 deaths of his brothers Jose and Jorge, and lung cancer death of Diego Gutierrez, the verbal and written predictions of the SC appointments of Justices Corona, De Leon, Jr., Capio-Morales, Callejo, Sr., Teresita de Castro (in Wikipedia), Brion, del Castillo (by phone to Atty. Gregorio M. Batiller, Jr.), Chief Justices Davide, Jr., Panganiban and Puno’s appointment against Quisumbing and Miriam Defensor-Santiago, by 3 hours card reading with Marilyn Puno Santiago, at the most sacred SC Conference hall.2
1 ? http://twitter.com/judgefloro
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118999288641229392.html?mod=psp_free_today
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5261856.stm
http://www..lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2006/mar2006/am_rtj-99-1460_2006.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Florentino_Floro&oldid=291975074
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Judgefloro&oldid=16482677
http://www.blogger.com/profile/08050768475939438767
2 http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/resolutions/2006/nov/am_2006_24_sc.htm [A.M. No. 2006-24-SC. November 14, 2006] JUDGE FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR. v. MRS. MARILYN PUNO SANTIAGO AND JASMIN MATEO Nov 14 2006
http://www.malaya.com.ph/01252010/news11.htmlMONDAY JANUARY 25, 2010
Cerge M. Remonde was the 7th of President Arroyo’s aides who died during her tenure. 9 others have been hospitalized for illness. The other deaths among the Cabinet during the Arroyo administration were political adviser Jose Ma. Rufino Jr., who died of liver cancer, and foreign secretary Blas Ople, who died after a heart attack on board a plane bound for Taiwan. On April 7, 2009, a Bell 412 presidential helicopter carrying four of Arroyo’s trusted officials crashed in the mountains of Ifugao province. They were supposed to prepare the activities for her arrival in the province the following day. Killed in the crash were Jose Capadocia, press undersecretary for operations and media relations, together with
26
iii) Judge Floro predicted the September 23-24, 2009 dire tragedies - (ROPE) Rod Nazario, lung cancer death after 2006 heart surgery, Ondoy, Pepeng and Global Millennium Earthquakes, Haiti and Chile, World Record Extra-judicial Killings of 30 journalists in Ampatuan Massacre – when the Court, on June 3, 2008, or exactly 25 years after LUIS, Armand and Angel appeared to his brother, Robert, expunged from the Rollo, his Motions to Enthrone- Consecrate the Eucharist and Mary in the 5 mystic fires courts he predicted, including the enthronement of Minita Viray Chico-Narario.
iv) Judge Floro accurately predicted the consecutive deaths of Cerge M. Remonde, Jose Capadocia, press undersecretary for operations and media relations, together with Appointments secretary Marilou Frostrom, surgeries and illnesses of Aquilino Pimentel, Jr., spinal pinched nerves, Alberto Romulo, heart surgery, Raul Gonzalez, kidney transplant, Pryde Teves, bombed grandson of Margarito Teves, after said officers denied Floro’s December 2006 Applications for job, work and trabajo .
v) Judge Floro holds the Ateneo Law School 1975-1985 unbroken record (not duplicated by 10 Ateneo Valedictorians, of 91% in criminal law review under Dean Antonio L. Gregorio, the No. 1 terror professor Ateneo ever had); he placed 12th in the 1983 Philippine Bar Examination, with a very high bar rating of 87.55% in one of the hardest examination in Philippine history (only 21.3% passed; 65% of both Ateneo and University of the Philippines College of Law students failed because of the taxation bar subject). This rating ties with that of SC Justice Antonio T. Carpio.
Appointments secretary Marilou Frostrom, Presidential Management Staff assistant director Perlita Bandayanon, and presidential senior military aide Brig. Gen. Carlos Clet. Also killed were the pilot, Maj. Rolando Sacatani, co-pilot Capt. Alvin Alegata, Clet’s aide Quarter Master 3rd Class Demilyn Reyno, and crewman Sgt. Roe Gem Perez. Serving under the Arroyo government also carries health risks. Gabriel Claudio has resigned as Arroyo’s political adviser to focus on treatment for his worsening congenital scoliosis and compressed spinal nerves, despite having undergone spinal surgery. Raul Gonzalez was replaced as justice secretary and appointed to the less stressful job of chief presidential legal counsel shortly after nearly losing his life from bleeding ulcers brought about by kidney problems. Finance Secretary Margarito Teves once got hospitalized due to pancreatitis, a sign of stress. Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo has undergone heart surgery. Monetary Board member Ignacio Bunye suffered from slipped disc when he was press secretary. Emilia Boncodin had a kidney transplant when she was budget secretary. Other Cabinet officials who have undergone medical treatment are: then Executive Secretary Renato de Villa, who underwent heart bypass; then presidential chief of staff Rigoberto Tiglao (and now ambassador to Greece), who also had heart bypass; and former presidential chief of staff and now Supreme Court Justice Renato Corona, who was treated for ulcers, two spinal cord surgeries. Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita and national security adviser Norberto Gonzales have been advised by their doctors to monitor their blood sugar and cholesterol level. – With Regina Bengco
http://www.mainlib.upd.edu.ph/ipn/details.php?id=2006101135960183
27
vi) Judge Floro became immortal in world history on April 7, 2006.3
“[g]reat cases like hard cases make bad law.” - Northern Securities Co. v. United
States, 193 US 197 (1904),[307](Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., dissenting)
“The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion. No person can be punished for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or non-attendance.”- Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947) Hugo Black
Judge Floro, per his 91% criminal law Ateneo record, is a legal luminary of higher caliber than all the sophisticated legal hypocrites. “Not even Chief Justice Davide, can hold the candle that you … and still you are proud of horses, predictions, healing … I told you to choose … be a judge or a priest …!” Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr.”
PGMA prophecy: The Fate and Faith of the Small President
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=30&art_id=26375&sid=9641493&con_type=3
Florentino and the three dwarves Saturday, September 02, 2006
Florentino says he predicted Joseph "Erap" Estrada's presidential downfall and prayed that present incumbent Gloria Macapagal Arroyo would survive her endless political battles. Looking ahead, he reckons Arroyo's power will end soon and the nation will suffer as a result.
Greed, anger, hatred, vendetta and ambition – Destiny and Prophecy
8. Erap never imagined that his very own appointees would jail him. When Floro predicted De Leon, Jr.’s appointment per request of Hermosisima, Jr., this nasty De Leon, Jr., who laughed at Floro’s lightning teeth (in 1996 at Dulcinea, Greenbelt chance meet, when the Prophet said, “See you in the Supreme Court!”) - ridiculed Erap in Channel 2 News, as he did bite his last McDo Burger and for 12 hours, Floro was there gazing and dancing-jumping as De Leon, Jr. was operated, suffered and died. Bingo! PGMA does not hold the necks of Justices, when ambitions are there roaming around like the elfs.
Nobody can predict except the Prophet Judge Floro, how the divided votes of SC Justices would be cast in the final hours of Carpio, Corona, and Brion, inter alia, with the dressed in immaculate white de Castro, CJ-spare-tire dark filly-in-waiting. Not even PGMA could predict if she would appoint the Chief Justice. With bated breath let us take a break with this Comedy of Errors:3NBI Deputy Director Gutierrez, 64 passes away May 21, 2002
? http://www.google.com.ph/search?hl=tl&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=3JE&q=judge+florentino+floro&btnG=Maghanap&meta=&aq=f&oq= Resultang 1 - 10 sa halos 184,000 para sa judge florentino floro . (0.09 segundo)
28
Intervenor Judge Floro had and has no illusion that he could even be nominated, but he did file the application on February 4, 2010, so that what he did prophecy to Arturo D. Brion (in 2001 inside his Pandacan home, while eating Art’s pancit canton and NUTS amid Tonette taking one of the 5 Floro Spanish Cards), would be fulfilled, and now he is there as God of Faura, gazing at jobless-homeless Judge Floro’s horrible pleading. Intervenor repeats: “I decided to endure my sufferings, since I was punished by the Supreme Court Justices, for consulting dwarves!” – Judge Floro
February 4, 2010 TV5 Televised Prophecy of Judge Floro on the Chief Justice issue vis-à-vis PGMA and FG Mike Arroyo’s Destiny: The FG Accident on February 18, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MB2JVdrT0M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bZ1Z40RBOo
Judge Florentino Floro Eyes Chief Justice Post
February 4, 2010, 26-pages Verified Application for Philippine Chief Justice by Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.; Judge Floro's Nomination of Atty. Henry R. Villarica, Atty. Gregorio M. Batiller, Jr., SC Associate Justices Arturo D. Brion and Conchita Carpio-Morales - TEN: The Evening News, TV 5, Associated Broadcasting Company, 10:30 - 11:30 p.m., February 4, 2010, No. 3 News (by Andrea Bautista)
There at TV5, Judge Floro said:
“Please do not edit this: PGMA will survive her political battles but in the end she will be hurt no time frame etc. which written prophecy I did publish per HK Standard Sept 2006 and in 2001 per 20 court pleadings in the SC.”
"Judge Floro also issued a PREDICTION on the fate of incumbent President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo whom he opted to be appointed Chief Justice, by: ....."
Judge Floro Prophecy - "xxx in the end, HE (referring to First Gentleman Mike Arroyo who suffered Feb 18 vehicular accident) would be ... he would SUFFER." (2:04 to 2:09)
NOTE that Judge Floro did not commit a grammatical error, but in mystic trance, his voice and speech were altered to prophecy the February 18 FG accident, which is true OMEN of the no time frame HURTING of PGMA.
So, FG Mike Arroyo was badly hurt in accident as OMEN, after Floro’s TV5 Feb 4 TV appearance broadcast, as prefatory to the final downfall of PGMA, and the nation’s greatest sufferings, as Fatima, Lourdes and other Marian Global Apparitions, reiterated conditionally.
29
Mike Arroyo escapes serious injury in car accidentInquirer.net - Tj Burgonio - Feb 18, 2010
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20100218-253924/Mike-Arroyo-escapes-serious-injury-in-car-accident MANILA, Philippines—First Gentleman Jose Miguel Arroyo was slightly hurt in a vehicular accident en route to the Wack-Wack Golf and Country ... Corona and Carpio are both haunted by so many filed JBC oppositions and if a pending case is filed, though barred by the impeachment provisions of the Constitution, then Brion might be the buddy-buddy alter for CJ, of Corona.
The Omen and Stern Warning
A final word. Judge Floro issues a stern warning upon any and all who contradicted and would unlawfully change PGMA’s destiny as prophesied by him in The Standard before Sam Chambers, 2006, re - 2001 prediction on PGMA. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo survived her political battles and is in pain. Look what happened to her tormentors FPJ and Cory Aquino, and to Erap, etc. Newspaper pundits could not explain this, and stated that Gloria was lucky. Erap is finished in political history since his neighbor Bernardo P. Pardo confirmed Flerida Ruth Romero’s suspension of Judge Floro on July 20, 1999. Gloria is not lucky. She is the only President who works 24/7, second only to Ferdinand E. Marcos. She is guided by spirit guides, in the same manner, that Judge Floro is. Benipayo and Nazario would live their lives, and they will never ever forget Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. and the 3 mystic dwares.
“Rod Nazario, the former business manager of Manny Pacquiao, and widely recognized as the man who gave the current pound-for-pound king his break on US soil, passed away at the age of 74 on Thursday morning at the Perpetual Help Hospital in Las Pinas, Metro Manila. Nazario, who became involved in the fight game during the time of Tanny Campo in the 1950s, had been diagnosed with lung cancer last year. Nazario even celebrated his birthday last Sept. 12 and over the weekend, Pacquiao dropped by the hospital and wished him well. Fightnews would like to express its condolences to the family of Nazario.”
http://lib1000.dlsu.edu.ph/search/Y?SEARCH=World-Famous+Mystic&SORT=D&searchscope=19
August 4, 2006 and August 28-29, 2006 - Judge Floro was not allowed to enter the house of Justice Nazario at 9 pm, and she instructed her lawyer, PS, Atty. Tolentino, etc., not to entertain Judge Floro, respectively.
In pages 357/399 of the 404 Pages First Book of Judge Floro, 2006, ISBN 9789716916195 "World-famous Mystic Armand, LUIS and Angel, the Three Dwarves MEET THE JUDGE, Psychic and Healing Martyr or Filipino Justice," LUIS, the King of kings of elementals ordered Judge Floro to write the Prophecy:
http://cid-e76bfff86f9a213f.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/judgefloro%5E_book.pdf
30
"FINAL WORD OF JUDGE FLORO TO JUSTICE MINITA VIRAY CHICO-NAZARIO” - Cursed 75 pages decision of Justice Minita Viray Chico-Nazario (Annex XXX)
On March 12, 2004, when hope was lost for Justice Nazario, only LUIS through Judge Floro, PUBLICLY, CONSTITUTIONALLY and by SPIRITUAL weapon, fought to enthrone MINITA, as God destined her to be the 15th Supreme Court Justice who would be the instrument to clean the corrupt judiciary and to PEN the landmark Decision which should have championed Justice. But she instead buried the truth awaiting its burial in her tomb. The 2 pages which MARKED her destiny is reproduced hereunder as LIVING proof that LUIS did prophesy her ASCENCION to the GOLDEN THRONE as GODDESS OF FAURA. Nazario's husband Rod, age 74, former Manny Pacquiao manager, passed away on September 24, 2009 after having undergone by-pass operation in 2006 and underwent chemo-therapy for his lung cancer, a day before
typhoon Ondoy devastated the Philippines.”+
Relief
PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is respectfully prayed to this Honorable Court – to Note and Grant the –
Verified Petition (With Leave of Court) for Intervention and Urgent Omnibus Motions –
I To Docket, Admit and Grant Petitioner’s Intervention Case, with Motion for Leave of Court to Pay Docket-Legal Fees ; and in the Alternative, to Waive Payment of Docket Fees and Permit Intevenor to Litigate as Pauper (having been Jobless Judge in pretend world since July 20, 1999 or 12 years and 3 months),
II. To Note, Consider and Include in the Judgment, Petitioner’s Letter-Concurring and Dissenting Opinion (which Predicts the Fate and Destiny of PGMA and this Honorable Court vis-à-vis the P-Noy Presidency (WE, with bated breath, await “the”/“its” Termination, that is, the Prophet says (per the Ultimate Pink and Violet Lights, He is not pre-destined to finish his term!): this is impeccably foretold in the SC Twin (Intervention) Pleadings filed on February 4 & March 5, 2010 (in G.R. No. 191002, etc., Arturo M. de Castro vs. JBC, et al.; inscribed therein is the foretold Prophecy on the Faith / Fate of the Incumbent President GMA, the Next Leader, P-Noy, the Next Chief Justice and the Forthcoming Dire Pains, Horrible Deaths, Famine, Disasters, Suicides, Accidents, Global Millennium Earthquakes vis-à-vis the 38 Visions-Apparitions of/to Judge Floro of the Blue Madonna, etc. vis-a-vis this standoff case ).
III. To Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution (upholding the DOJ-Comelec Panel Report)-Election Sabotage Charges
31
dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas,
IV. And to Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and To Join-Add-Consolidate all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts or Tribunals in these Consolidated Cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent Powers of Courts), to Prevent Mockery of Justice, Judicial Sabotage and Multiplicty of Suits.
It is further prayed to the Court, that the instant pleading filed by the undersigned be given due course, considered and GRANTED, in view of the extraordinary circumstances above-submitted. Other reliefs and remedies, just and equitable under the circumstances are likewise prayed for.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I signed this pleading, application, nomination – motion, this 18th day, Friday of November, 2011, at Malolos City, 3000 Bulacan, Philippines for Manila, Metro Manila.
Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.,Petitioner-in-Intervention,
Cel. # 0915-5330008, c/o Benjamin V. Floro , #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN,
Tel. # (044) 840-8176[I.D. Number: RTCJ-317 / EDP Number: 38676300; ROLL OF ATTORNEY’S NO. 32800,
Pg. No. 60, Book No. XIV].
VERIFICATION and Certification of Non-Forum Shopping
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )Malolos City, BULACAN ) S.S.
I, Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr., movant, petitioner, under oath, depose/say, that:
I am the intervenor-movant-petitioner in these cases. I caused the preparation, signed and read the instant pleading, and all the contents/allegations thereof are true and correct of my own personal knowledge or based on authentic records.
I CERTIFY (a) that I have not theretofore commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court, tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of my knowledge, no such other action or claim is pending therein; (b) if there is such other pending action or claim, I will file a complete statement of the present status thereof, but there is none; and (c) if I should thereafter learn that the same or similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, I shall report that fact within five (5) days therefrom to the court wherein his aforesaid complaint or initiatory pleading has been filed.
Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.
32
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 18th day of November, 2011, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2010.
DOC. NO. , PAGE NO. , BOOK NO. , SERIES OF 2011.
BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public,
Until Jan.31, 2011, PTR NO. 4048722, 11- 25’10,
Atty.’s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 813840, 11-21,’10
MCLE COMP. III0019636, 12- 21-‘10 Malolos, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary
NOTICE and Urgent Request to be Granted a Special, Appropriate Reserved Seat in the Oral Argument as Intervenor
TO: The Clerk of Court, En Banc, Supreme Court, En Banc, Manila,
Please AGENDUM this pleading-motions and submit them forthwith to the Supreme Court, En Banc, upon receipt hereof, for its deliberation and resolution. It is respectfully request that undersigned be Granted a Special, Appropriate Reserved Seat in the Oral Argument as Intervenor.
Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR.
COPY FURNISHED-SERVED:
(By Registered Mail with Return Card): Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copies of this pleading was made by registered mail with return card upon herein parties:
Attys. ESTELITO P. MENDOZA, IVY D. PATDU and HYACINTH E. RAFAEL, Law Office of Estelito P. Mendoza & Associates Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 4th Floor Dynavision Building 108 Rada St., Legaspi Village
33
Makati City; Tel: +63 281 700 16Fax: +63 2 810 5513; emai: [email protected];
Attys. ANACLETO M. DIAZ, MARIA ROSARIO Z. DEL ROSARIO, CHRISTIAN B. DIAZ and ANALENE V. BALISONG, Law Firm of Diaz Del Rosario & Associates Co-counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 6th Floor Padilla Bldg., F. Ortigas, Jr. Road (formerly Emerald Avenue) Ortigas Center, Pasig City Tel: 634 8481,636 1608 Fax: 634 8481
Attys. FERDINAND S. TOPACIO and JOSELITO O. LOMANGAYA, Topacio Law Office Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199046 Suite 107 Skyway Twin Towers, H. Javier Street, Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Tels: 571-0270; 616-4627 Fax: 571-1626 Email: [email protected]
Office of the Solicitor General Anselmo Cadiz,134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, Makati CityTel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037Email: [email protected] Copies of the Registry Receipts are attached above, while the ORIGINALS of the Registry Receipts are attached with the last pages of the Petition-in-intervention.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )City of Malolos, Bulacan ) S.S.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
I, Judge Florentino Floro, as Petitioner-in-intervention, with residence, address at c/o Benjamin V. Floro , #23 Saluysoy, Meycauayan, 3020 BULACAN, after being duly sworn, depose and say:
That on November 21, 2011, I served copies with annexes of the following pleading/paper by registered mail with return card in accordance with Rule 13, inter alia, of the Revised Rules of Court.Nature of Pleading/PaperPetition-in-Intervention In PGMA vs Leila De Lima, et al. , etc. G.R. Nos. 199034, 199046.
The addressee(s) are as follows:(By Registered Mail with Return Card): Explanation: Due to lack of messenger, and impracticality, service of copies of this pleading was made by registered mail with return card upon herein parties: by depositing the copies with annexes in the Plaridel, Bulacan post office, in sealed envelopes, plainly addressed to the parties or their counsels at their offices, with postage fully pre-paid, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after ten (l0) days if undelivered, as evidenced by the registry receipts attached herewith.
Attys. ESTELITO P. MENDOZA, IVY D. PATDU and HYACINTH E. RAFAEL, Law Office of Estelito P. Mendoza & Associates Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 4th Floor Dynavision Building
34
108 Rada St., Legaspi Village Makati City; Tel: +63 281 700 16Fax: +63 2 810 5513; emai: [email protected];
Attys. ANACLETO M. DIAZ, MARIA ROSARIO Z. DEL ROSARIO, CHRISTIAN B. DIAZ and ANALENE V. BALISONG, Law Firm of Diaz Del Rosario & Associates Co-counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199034 6th Floor Padilla Bldg., F. Ortigas, Jr. Road (formerly Emerald Avenue) Ortigas Center, Pasig City Tel: 634 8481,636 1608 Fax: 634 8481
Attys. FERDINAND S. TOPACIO and JOSELITO O. LOMANGAYA, Topacio Law Office Counsel for Petitioner in G.R. No. 199046 Suite 107 Skyway Twin Towers, H. Javier Street, Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Tels: 571-0270; 616-4627 Fax: 571-1626 Email: [email protected]
Office of the Solicitor General Anselmo Cadiz,134 Amorsolo St. Legaspi Village, Makati CityTel. Nos. 818-6381 Fax Nos. 817-6037Email: [email protected] Copies of the Registry Receipts are attached above, while the ORIGINALS of the Registry Receipts are attached with the last pages of the Petition-in-intervention.
Judge FLORENTINO V. FLORO, JR., affiant
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me, on this 21st day of November, 2011, here at Malolos City, Bulacan, affiant exhibited to me his CTC NO. CC12005 # 21783592, issued at Malolos, Bulacan, on 2-27, 2010.
DOC. NO. , PAGE NO. , BOOK NO. , SERIES OF 2011.
BERNAR D. FAJARDO Notary Public,
Until Jan.31, 2011, PTR NO. 4048722, 11- 25’10,
Atty.’s Roll No. 33633, IBP OR # 813840, 11-21,’10
MCLE COMP. III0019636, 12- 21-‘10 Malolos, Bulacan, (044) 662-5335 Celp. # 0906-9669792, Secretary
35
I. To Declare Null and Void, the a) COMELEC En Banc Resolution (upholding the DOJ-Comelec Panel Report)-Election Sabotage Charges dated 18 November, 2011, b) the Order and Warrant Arrest dated 18 November, 2011, issued by Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas.
II. To Join/Include as Nominal Party, Br. 112, RTC, Pasay City Judge Jesus Mupas (under Sec. 11, Misjoinder and Non-Joinder of Parties, Rule 3, Rules of Court) and To Join-Add-Consolidate all other Necessary-Related Causes of Actions Pending in any other Courts or Tribunals in these Consolidated Cases (under Rule 135, Sec. 5, Inherent Powers of Courts), to Prevent Mockery of Justice, Judicial Sabotage and Multiplicty of Suits.
Downfall of the 14th President of the Republic of the Philippines
On the feast of the Black Nazarene, at exactly 6:00 a.m., January 9, 1999, Judge Floro was bestowed his first vision (of 38) of the a) and b) global millennium massive earthquakes & several world apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary and the physical hurting of VP Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.
This vision was written and repeatedly published as Prophecy to the High Tribunal per Court Pleadings on April 13, 2001, July 20, 2003, 2004 & 2005, in HK Standard newspaper on September 2, 2006 and in the Ombudsman Curse dated 3 June, 2011.
36
"Hindi totoong napakasama ni Gloria. Tanong ko lang: a) bakit si Marcos, gumagapang na sa hirap ng sakit na Lupus, hindi pa pinayagang umuwi ni Corazon mula sa Hawaii? b) bakit si Cory naghirap sa colon cancer, gaya ni VP Doy na halos maglulupasay sa sahig sanhi ng walang lunas na karamdaman? c) bakit si FVR, ganun din ang sinapit ng kaniyang anak, damay pa ang kapatid nitong binangga ng elf at 3 beses inoperahan? d) bakit nakulong ng 69.1 buwan si Erap vis-a-vis 68.1 buwang Benipayo suspension ni Judge Floro na tinanggal ni Minita noong ika-7 ng Abril, 2006? e) bakit bumagsak si Arroyo kasabay at eksakto sa kaniyang "physical hurting" noong ika-58th na kaarawan ni Judge Floro ayon a Prediksyon ng 3 duende? Bakit 11 tragedha ang dinanas ng bansa mula ng sinumpa ng Anghel ng Kamatayan ang pagkakatalaga kay Carpio-Morales?
Dahil ba napakasama nilang lahat? Dahil ba napakabulok ng mga buto nila? Dahil ba sukdulan ang mga kasalanan ng kanilang mga magulang at mga anak?
Hindi, kundi, naganap ang mga itinakda ni LUIS, ayon sa Ultimate Violet and Pink Lights ni Judge Floro upang
37
matanggap, mamasdan at malaman ng buong mundo, na sa buong kalawakan, ang pangalan ni Judge Floro ay: "Pinagpala, Powerful", Element 115, Angel of Death, Prophet, Visionary ...
Mula ng ginawa sa Genesis ang sangkalibutan, si Judge Floro lang ang may mga mata at mga palad, na kahit anong oras, ay maaaring makita ng kahit sino mang tao, ang mga mistikong liwanag, ang langit, kalawakan, pati si na si Kristo at Maria ..." - Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr.
38