Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WAAS Ionospheric Research at Stanford
Andrew Hansen
30 June 1998
Abstract
This presentation summarizes the WAAS ionospheric research conducted by the WADGPS Laboratory at Stanford
University including primarily tomographic estimation, ionospheric data collection, and high �delity WAAS simulation. The
fundamental physical resource for the work is the National Satellite Test Bed (NSTB) reference network. The coupling of live
data from the NSTB and the theoretical algorithms developed at Stanford has realized a working WAAS prototype with the
capability of exploring operational di�culties and the sensitivities to natural variations such as the ionosphere. We present
performance results for both live and synthetically disturbed conditions.
Electronic copy is available under \Presentations" at http://www.stanford.edu/�ahansen/ on the Web.
Purview
� Real-time tomographic estimation
{ real-time estimation algorithm
{ ionospheric reconstructions
{ hardware bias calibration
{ navigation performance
� Ionospheric data collection
{ continuous real-time ionospheric parameters (DDai)
{ post processing of 1Hz NSTB data (Nusawardhana)
� High-�delity WAAS simulation facility (EPeterson)
{ ionospheric disturbances
{ clock/SA modelling
{ orbit disturbances
{ measurement noise
AJHansen 6/30/98
Wide Area Di�erential GPS Navigation (WAAS)
MS
r
ionoclockephemeris
GPS
GEO
RS
ethernet
1 2
3 N
ionosphere
δ
AJHansen 6/30/98
Wide area Ionospheric Corrections
Reference observations spatially correlated by the ionosphere areassembled into continental scale estimates
-130 -110 -90 -7010
20
30
40
50
60
70
Correlated user ranging errors are corrected by projecting theestimate onto the local SV geometry
AJHansen 6/30/98
Tomography, Solution to an Inverse Problem
Medical Imaging (CAT scan) Ionospheric Imaging (GPS)
AJHansen 6/30/98
Real-time Ionosphere Estimation Methodologies
3D Tomography 2D Thin Shell
AJHansen 6/30/98
Vertical Basis of EOF's
heig
ht (
km)
0 0.05 0.10
100
200
400
500
600EOF #1
−0.2 −0.1 0 0.1 0.20
100
200
300
400
500
600EOF #2
−0.2 −0.1 0 0.1 0.20
100
200
300
400
500
600EOF #3
AJHansen 6/30/98
Energy Spectrum of Electron Density Distribution
0 5 10 15 20 250
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Energy in Ionospheric Spectra (IRI90)
SSN = 150
SSN = 60
BandwidthConstraint
ModelResiduals
AJHansen 6/30/98
National Satellite Test Bed (NSTB)
Network of dual-freq receivers (Trimble, Ashtech, NovAtel)connected in real-time via multicast UDP to central serverplatform (DEC Alpha 4100s).
AJHansen 6/30/98
Software IFB Calibration
� Relative IFBs simple if receivers collocated
� Single network wide bias is tolerable in position domain (�clock)
� Remote IFB calibration necessarily relies on a model ionosphere
� IFB must pass through a non-linearity to be observed
� One such transformation is obliquity factor (2D iono model)
� Using a 3D model, receiver IFB is addressed directly
AJHansen 6/30/98
Interfrequency Bias Calibration
IFB1
Tgd
Ne(r,t)
IFB2
Tgd
IFB
Ne(r,t)
Tgd
IFB
Ne(r,t)
Tgd
IFB
Ne(r,t)
AJHansen 6/30/98
Tomographic IFB Calibration
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50−20
−15
−10
−5
0
5
10
15
UT (hr)
L 1/L2 IF
B (m
)
Interfrequency Bias Calibration (40 receivers)
AJHansen 6/30/98
Tomographic Tgd Calibration
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50−5
0
5
10
UT (hr)
T gd (m
)
Group Delay Calibration (27 SVs)
AJHansen 6/30/98
Real-time Tomographic Reconstructions
Electron Density @ 100W Vertical Reduction @ 350km
2530
3540
4550
55
200
300
400
500
6000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
x 10−11
N latitude
Ne @ 100W UT 13:49
altitude (km)
Ne
(#/m
^3)
−140−120
−100−80
−60−40
20
30
40
50
600
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
W longitudeN latitude
vert
ical
del
ay (
m)
AJHansen 6/30/98
Horizontal System Performance (25 March 1998)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
σ Hm
ajor
(m
)
8
7
6
5
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
HPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Horizontal Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (103466 epochs)
Error (m)
Alarm Epochs: 0
System Unavailable
Failures: 0
HPLWAAS
Normal Operation> 99.999%
HP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
104
AJHansen 6/30/98
Vertical System Performance (25 March 1998)
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
σ V (
m)
4
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Vertical Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (103650 epochs)
Error (m)
Alarm Epochs: 3
System Unavailable
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
99.997%Normal Operation
VP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
AJHansen 6/30/98
Vertical System Performance, Tomo IFBs (25 March 1998)
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
σ V (
m)
4
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Vertical Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (103466 epochs)
Error (m)
Alarm Epochs: 5
System Unavailable
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
99.995%Normal Operation
VP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
AJHansen 6/30/98
Vertical System Performance, Dual freq (25 March 1998)
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
σ V (
m)
4
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Vertical Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (103464 epochs)
Error (m)
Alarm Epochs: 16
System Unavailable
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
99.985%Normal Operation
VP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
AJHansen 6/30/98
Ionospheric Data Collection (NSTB)
� 40+ calibrated (IFB,SNR) receivers at 29 locations
� Dual-frequency carrier smoothed code (multipath free)
� Multi-resolution (10/300/1800 sec) �lter bank for data reduction
� Receiver archive data format
{ time history per SV pass
{ entries are time PRN El Az IL1 N� � slip
{ 1� 11
2MB per day (� 12GB per year)
{ slip index denotes detected bias break not a receiver ag
� High level (Matlab) archive interrogation
AJHansen 6/30/98
Software Simulator for WAAS
GPS Almanac
* SV Clock Models* Orbit Disturbances
* SV Ephemeris
Σ ∆Φ
Iono Delay
Σ
WAAS Simulator
Tropo Delay
Σ
Multipath
Synthetic Truth Data
WG2 Message
LOS Signal
Propagation
ArcataNominal Models
Bangorpr,
ColumbusSNR, Dopp
Great Falls
����������
Greenwood
GenerateWAASCorrection
TMS
* Spatial Dependence
* Anomalous Behavior* Temporal Dependence
Ionospheric Correlation
IonosphericDisturbanceDatabase
������
���������������
���������
����������������
�����������������������������������
�����������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������������������
TRS Observables
AJHansen 6/30/98
Ionospheric Disturbance Scenario
� Nominal models
{ 26 SV Constellation (no GEOs)
{ background iono model based on PIM
{ SNR receiver model with live data, Dai (IEEE PLANS, 1998)
{ tropo model from WAAS MOPS
{ multipath model, Enge, et.al (Proc. IEEE, 1995)
{ 27 reference receivers, 2 monitors
� Injected electron density enhancement
{ Gaussian bubble layer at 300(km)
{ 500 (km) 1-� centered at 35N, 100W
{ amplitude is 25% of nominal
{ �xed in solar-magnetic coordinates
� Truth available in both pseudo-range and position domain
AJHansen 6/30/98
Horizontal System Performance (Simulated Iono)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
σ Hm
ajor
(m
)
12
11
10
9
8
7
5
4
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
HPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Failures: 0
HPLWAAS
Horizontal Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (20989 epochs)
Error (m)
Continuity Threats: 0
System Unavailable
Normal Operation> 99.999%
HP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
AJHansen 6/30/98
Vertical System Performance (Simulated Iono)
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
σ V (
m)
4
3
2
1
0
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
Failures: 0
Integrity
Vertical Performance at FAA Tech Center − 0x0121 (20989 epochs)
Error (m)
Continuity Threats: 0
System Unavailable
Failures: 0
VPLWAAS
Normal Operation> 99.999%
VP
L WA
AS (
m)
Num
ber
of P
oint
s pe
r P
ixel
100
101
102
103
AJHansen 6/30/98