Upload
harold-farmer
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems
• Status
• Ongoing research• Needs for MJO• Bulk formula in ocean models
• Plans
New Marine Aspects Section• Peter Janssen (head)• Ocean/Sea Ice• Waves
Serving all time scales: analysis, medium range, monthly and seasonal
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
Delayed Ocean Re-Analysis ~ORAS4 (NEMOVAR)
Real Time Ocean Analysis
ECMWF:
Forecasting Systems
ECMWF:
Forecasting Systems
Medium-Range (10-day)Partial coupling
Medium-Range (10-day)Partial coupling
Seasonal ForecastsFully coupled
Seasonal ForecastsFully coupled
Extended + Monthly Fully coupled
Extended + Monthly Fully coupled
Ocean model
Atmospheric model
Wave model
Atmospheric model
Ocean model
Wave model
Oce
an Init
ial
Condit
ions
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
Monthly Forecasts needs
• Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) is corner stone for monthly forecasting (as ENSO is for seasonal)
• It influences NAO regimes (Cassau et al 2008) and predictability over Europe (Vitart)
• MJO forecasts needs interactive ocean, good representation of ocean mixing (high vertical
resolution)
Woolnough et al, MWR 2007
Anomaly Correlation
Persisted SST anomalies
OGCM (10 m vertical res)
Mixed layer (1 m vertical res)
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
MJO revisited: PC1 and PC2
• Models have improved: Even Persisted SST
crosses the 0.6 value after day 20.
• Performance of persisted SST anomaly,
current practice, is easy to beat by
introducing coupling with the ocean.
• Not much differences between 1D KPP and
3D NEMO (10m level thickness) Now there is a diurnal layer scheme in the
atmosphere NEMO mixing better than HOPE?
• The Observed SST (even weekly product) still
better than coupling
• What is the performance with OSTIA?
• Can we expect to beat observed SST?Courtesy of Eric de Boisseson
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
Bulk formula modifications (Hersbach, Janssen 2008)
OLD-NEW: Taux OLD-NEW: Mixed Layer Depth OLD-NEW: SST
• Ultimately: to use the same bulk formula as in the atmosphere model (IFS)
• First Sensitivity: modify the empirical function for the drag coefficient as a function of wind speed to simulate the results from the IFS. It produces stronger drags for high winds.
• Impact on windstress ~ 10%. It impacts mixed layer depth. It reduces SST errors
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF
Plans
• Implement Sea Ice model• Coupled it to monthly and seasonal forecasts• Initialization of the sea-ice model
• Improve the Air-Sea interaction physics• Bulk formula for estimation of fluxes (include wave effects, use IFS formula)• Impact of waves in ocean mixing
• Improve Air-Sea interaction software infrastructure• Single executable
• Develop software for a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Reanalyses System (timeline uncertain)