Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
February 2013
PAWL Committee Members
Maureen Devaney
Co-Executive Director
Vision for Equality, Inc.
Audrey Coccia Co-Executive Director Vision for Equality, Inc. Sheila Stasko, Statewide Manager PA Waiting List Campaign Lisa Tesler, Policy Coordinator
Ned Whitehead, Project Assistant
Mary Saunders, Project Assistant
Mark Murphy, Executive Director Disability Rights Network Ilene Shane, Esq.
Nancy Murray, President, Arc Greater Pittsburgh Nathaniel Williams, PhD President & CEO Human Works Affiliates Deb Leasure, Coordinator Mentors
Kaye Lenkner, Coordinator SAU1
Teri Brewer, Trainer SAU1
Oscar Drummond, Self Advocate
Ashley Parks, Self Advocate
Nancy Richey, Parent Tom Carasiti, Parent Karin Annerhed-Harris Communications Manager, VFE
In case you missed it, here is an
excerpt from the Governor’s budget
address:
"I'd like to share with you my
experience on a visit I made recently
to Vision for Equality, a social ser-
vice agency in Philadelphia. I met
with families who had adult sons and
daughters with severe intellectual
disabilities.
Because of their conditions they face
challenging lives. And it became
even more challenging because
they "aged-out" of the services
the state provides for children.
They were put on a waiting
list—a waiting list that delays
their access to the help that
would allow them to work, to live
at home, to enjoy a full measure
of life's experiences.
But these families would not let
these disabilities and the waiting
list stand in the way of their
dreams.
continued pg. 15
Governor Corbett proposed $20M for the Waiting List
Next Year. What Do We Need to Do Now?
1. We need to keep the momentum going!
2. We can not become complacent.
3. We need to make sure funding gets to the people. 4. Make sure you are a waiting list subscriber to receive email updates.
www.pawaitinglistcampaign.org
Governor Corbett Speaks of the Waiting List
at His Budget Address
2
H i, I am Oscar
Drummond. I am a
young man, active in my
community, living in my
own apartment, and I
just happen to have
disabilities. I use a
wheelchair, need 24/7
supports, and have oth-
er medical issues. It can
be hard for people to understand me.
For most of my life I lived with my Mom. But like any
other young man, I knew it was time for me to get
my own place. My mom was worried about that.
She told me about all the things I could not do, and
that I would have to depend on other people –
strangers. She knew some folks worked with people
with disabilities for the wrong reasons, to be in con-
trol and to have power over someone else.
Even so, Mom did not stand in my way. I spoke up
about what I needed to live my life and to be healthy
and safe. It took a few years to try and teach sever-
al providers until I found the one that understands
that how I live my life is up to me, and supports me
to live just the way I want. Was it hard? YES! Was it
worth it? ABSOLUTELY!
I live in my own apartment now. I choose when I get
up and go to bed, what I eat and what I wear. I am
involved in my church, do lots with my family, and go
places with my friends. I work as a trainer for
people with disabilities and use the money I earn to
go on vacations.
I give back to my community by volunteering a lot of
my time to serve as a Board member of a local
agency as well as the President of the Board of Self
Advocates United as 1, a group of people with ID/
DD from all over PA.
My agency has a van dedicated to my use, and I get
all the supports I need for my physical and medical
needs right in my home.
Part of my volunteer work has taken me to visit with
folks who live in institutions. I hear from them what
their life is like. Many have no doors on their bed-
room, and very few have a key. Most share a room
and did not choose the person they room with. Their
belongings are often “borrowed” by staff or other resi-
dents. They do not choose when to go to bed or
what time to get up. Many are not “allowed” in the
kitchen and do not choose when or what to eat.
They do go places, but almost always as a group and
someone else decides when and where. They watch
TV in a room with others and do not get to choose for
themselves what to watch. Most of their days are
spent on the grounds going from building to building
and rarely seeing the “real” world.
I have learned there are many reasons why
people still live in institutions – and I have learned
that there are solutions. The supports people need
are not always available in the community – so pro-
viders need to work to increase what is available, and
ODP must make sure there is enough funding to sup-
port those needs.
Families do not always know the many ways
people can be supported – through participant
directed services where folks hire their own staff, to
day programs, and other services – but there are
ways they can learn, like through the trainings offered
all over the state by the PA Training Partnership.
Some people do not have families to help them figure
things out – but if there are well trained, dedicated
supports coordinators, they could get what they need
in the community.
Living in the community saves taxpayers a lot of money as well. The cost to keep a person in a state center is over two hundred thousand dollars. continued pg. 8
Oscar’s Self-Determined Life
3
The Facts are ...
Pennsylvania Waiting List Campaign Fact Sheet
January 2013
The Pennsylvania Waiting List Campaign’s goal is to end the devastation of Waiting Lists for persons with intellectual disabili-ties and autism who are in need of services through the Pennsylvania Office of Developmental Programs. The waiting list is comprised of self advocates, families, caregivers who are registered with the system and waiting for funding for services and supports, and also providers, agencies and supporters who work with us to reach our common goals.
Emergency Category – People need services immediately; their health and safety is at risk right now!
Critical Category – People need services within two years to stay safe and healthy.
Planning – People will need services within the next 5 years.
The Pennsylvania Waiting List Campaign asks for $20 million and a Five Year Plan
We are asking to follow the 5 recommendations and the five year financial plan as outlined in the
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT ON THE WAITING LIST FOR
COMMUNITY-BASED SERVICES from 2008.
http://jsg.legis.state.pa.us
Provide services for those on the emergency list in FY 2013/2014 = $20 million for 1200 people
Commit to allocate funding sufficient to eliminate the emergency list within 3 years.
Formulate a fiscal plan for the critical and planning categories going forward through FY 2017/18, using the systemic approach outlined in the Waiting List Report.
"“During the course of my tenure, the goal is to eradicate that waiting list," Governor Corbett
told about 50 advocates, people with disabilities and family members during a recent event at
Vision for Equality in Philadelphia.
4,187 Emergency
Category
6,694
Critical
Category
4251 Planning
Category
People Waiting
15,132 as of January
31, 2013
4
All of these terms refer to a situation in which an
individual with an intellectual disability lives with
and shares life experiences with another person,
couple or family. It means that people mutually
decide to live together. It does not just mean a
place to live. It means that people share their
lives: care for each other, spend holidays and
family vacations together, and introduce each
other as “a member of my family”.
Many people with intellectual disabilities prefer to
live in a family setting and be a member of a fami-
ly as opposed to living in a community home with
housemates and staff. For example, a person
who was institutionalized at a young age may nev-
er have had the chance to live with a family. A
person who lived in a very dysfunctional family as
a young child may never have truly enjoyed the
benefits of living with a caring and supportive fam-
ily. Some people with intellectual disabilities de-
velop strong and caring relationships with staff at
community programs and decide that they would
like to be together as a family.
However, some families of people with intellectual
disabilities find it difficult to accept having their
family member become part of someone else’s
family. This is especially true when a person with
behavioral challenges living with their biological
family goes to live with another family. It is difficult
for the biological family to understand how anoth-
er family can care for the person and they could
not. Or, when an adult with a disability decides
that he would like to live with a staff person from
his community recreation program rather than with
his parents.
The person, couple or family who share their lives
with a person with an intellectual disability may be
referred to as ‘the shared living provider’, ‘mentor’,
‘host family’, ‘life sharer’ or other similar term.
Shared Living - Family Living - Life Sharing
What is it?
submitted by Nancy Murray
. . . some families of people with disabilities are asking if they can be the life-sharer for their brother, sister,
cousin or grandchild.
All of these terms describe a situation in which the
family lives with the person with a disability and
provides whatever support the person needs to
have an everyday life. Usually, the shared living
arrangement is in the person’s, couple’s or family’s
home or apartment, but people could also live in
the home of the person with a disability. The
shared living provider is typically compensated fi-
nancially, and/or the person may receive benefits
such as room and board. The shared living provid-
er may work for a provider organization as a full
time staff or contracted staff person. Or, the
shared living provider may have a private agree-
ment to provide supports to a person.
As shared living, family living and life sharing have
become service options in more states for people
with disabilities, some families of people with disa-
bilities are asking if they can be the life-sharer for
their brother, sister, cousin or grandchild. Given
the increasing shortage of direct care staff, state
budget crises, and the waiting lists for services for
people with disabilities, states are beginning to ex-
plore issues, including:
Compensating family members as life-
sharers,
Developing policy on when and how fami-
lies as life-sharers will be approved,
Deciding which family members will be
compensated,
Deciding if should there be limitations on
the supports/care provided,
Deciding whether family members should
be expected to meet the same qualifications
and attend the same trainings as non-family
members?
Deciding whether legal guardians can be
paid care givers?
continued on pg. 11
5
S tacie likes living in her little town in Northeast
PA because everybody seems to know her and
really care about her. They worry about her and
what is going to happen when she graduates. She
has a lot of friends through school. Stacie is a
young lady who has just turned 21 in November of
2012. This is her last year of high school and she
will be aging out of school in June 2013. Stacie
has been part of the Children and Youth Services
until her 21st birthday. She had been moved be-
tween 7 different foster homes since she was 6
years old. On her 21st birthday, Stacy was
dropped by CYS. She has no Home and Commu-
nity Waiver Services. Her funding is currently be-
ing paid through Base Funds from the County.
They are paying for her Life Share at the moment,
but are not sure how long that funding will be able
to last.
Stacie is not alone. Her twin sister is living in a Life
Share situation also. Together, the county is pay-
ing over $52,000 for the two young ladies.
That doesn’t take into account any other sup-
ports and services that they will need when they
graduate or the need to transition into work and
community opportunities.
Stacie has lived 2 ½ years with Miss Thomas as
her Lifeshare Family. Miss Thomas was coach-
ing the JV team at her local school. Stacie came
out for basketball one year. She had to work
through some things with her participating due to
her age. She had gone through her graduation
exercise with her class but had come back to
continue her education until she was 21. Stacie
came to a few practices, but really didn’t like all
the work that went into getting ready for the sea-
son. Miss Thomas asked Stacie if she would like
to be a part of the basketball program without
having to do all the running. Stacie was given the
title of Assistant Coach. She became a shining
light for the basketball program. Stacie doesn’t
sugar coat it, she tells it to the players like it is.
When Miss Thomas was promoted to the Varsity
Girls basketball job, Stacie came with her. Stacie
and the coach and the girls from the team have
built a friendship that continues to this day. Miss
Thomas tells of the story about going to see an
Elvis impersonator after this past year’s season.
Stacie attended all the home games. She had
her Assistant Coach shirt that she wore to the
games. The student athletes were very support-
ive of her. They would laugh and carry on with
her but they also respected her and looked out for
her at school. Miss Thomas is hoping that Stacie
will be able to continue to be a part of the basket-
ball program under the new girl’s basketball
coach.
Meet Stacie! by Ned Whitehead, Stacie’s Advocate
Stacie with Governor Corbett
continued pg. 9
6
PUNS – Top Priority for Those Who Wait by Lisa Tesler
This year’s waiting list initiative was great news for more than a thousand families in Pennsylvania and re-
minded us of the importance of good data and accurate PUNS forms.
For those of you who are new, the Prioritization of Urgency of Need for Services (PUNS) is the evaluation
tool used by the Office of Developmental Programs to understand how many people with intellectual disabil-
ities need services, what types of services they need, and when they need them. The data collected is
used to identify the scope of the waiting list and how dramatic the needs are for people. When the waiting
list initiative was passed by the legislators and signed by Corbett as part of the budget, the PUNS form was
the basis for the funding allocation. Unfortunately for some elderly caregivers, they were not identified as
over the age of 60 on their form…and therefore were not “counted” in the data that drove the budget deci-
sions. The state discovered that approximately 350 elderly caregivers were not properly counted in the da-
ta, and therefore were not budgeted for and could not receive waiver funding this year.
As family members, we need to make sure our PUNS are updated each year and that all the relevant cate-
gories are marked yes. The PUNS is the gateway to services and the data is essential for ODP,DPW, the
legislators and the Governor to grasp the scope of the problem.
If you need services within 5 years, you need a PUNS form. It’s just that simple. If you need a service,
make sure your supports coordinator marks it “yes”. If you need services immediately (within 6 months),
make sure you are in the Emergency Category. Sounds simple, but clearly some mistakes have been
made.
continued on pg. 14
PUNS as of January 31, 2013
By Region, County Joinder, Urgency of Needs and Age Group
Age Group Critical Emergency Planning Grand Total
01: Age 17 or Below 1,611 450 1,598 3,659
02: Age 18 to 20 1,483 835 665 2,983
03: Age 21 275 427 56 758
04: Age 22 to 29 1,051 985 493 2,529
05: Age 30 to 39 671 499 529 1,699
06: Age 40 to 49 718 389 439 1,546
07: Age 50 to 59 582 417 297 1,296
08: Age 60 or Above 303 185 174 662
Grand Total 6,694 4,187 4,251 15,132
PUNS Numbers show that people of all ages are on the waiting list.
7
D ear Wanda,
I have heard a lot
about waiting lists for services
through the county programs and
about the PA Waiting List Cam-
paign, but my child has autism.
Does the waiting list include people with autism? Can
I go to the County MH/ID Office to get on the list?
Does this list include people waiting for the Adult Au-
tism Waiver?
Thanks,
Just Getting Started
Dear Just Getting Started:
Good Questions! Some people with Autism
will qualify for services through the Intellectual
Disability System and/or the Mental Health System
and should go to their county office to apply for ser-
vices. People who have both autism and intellectual
disability could be on the waiting list for ID services,
and many are. The Bureau of Autism Services is not
associated with the County ID programs or offices. In
order to apply for the Adult Autism Waiver or the Adult
Community Autism Program, you need to
contact them directly at 1-866-539-7689. Their
programs serve individuals 21 and older.
The Bureau of Autism Services does not main-
tain a waiting list, but keeps an interest list. There are
approximately 840 people with autism on the “Interest
List.”
The Bureau will mail out applications to those people
on the interest list as funding becomes available to
serve them. The Autism system does not use a
PUNS form to prioritize need.
Please visit www.autisminpa.org for additional
Information.
Wanda
D ear Wanda,
I heard about the Waiting List initiative at a
Partnership Training last fall and was so excited that I
called my Supports Coordinator (SC) right away to ask
her if my daughter (graduate, 2012) would get services
this year. My SC said that there were no new waiver
slots, that my sources were wrong. I then followed up
with the County people, and they confirmed that my
daughter was identified as a potential waiver enrollee.
And in fact, she did get the waiver in early December.
Question…if the budget was signed in July, why
didn’t my SC have information about the Waiting List
Initiative? Why are SC’s not up to date with systems
information? This isn’t the first time that this has hap-
pened…just last month I was told that they were NOT
using the new Outcomes process yet.
Thanks,
SC is Behind the Times
Dear Times:
We at the Waiting List Campaign strive to pro-
vide you and all families and self
advocates the most up to date information about the
system, the waiting list funding, and other
policy issues that impact services available. Please
continue to keep yourself educated and informed. The
Training Partnership for People with Disabilities and
Families is a great way to stay on top of things.
We don’t understand why some Supports Coor-
dination entities do not keep their staff well informed.
SCs have many hours of mandatory trainings to attend,
and should be receiving alerts and other resources to
stay on top of any changes.
If the problem continues, as a waiver participant,
your daughter can change her Support Coordination
Agency. You should also share your concern with the
County/AE, the Regional Office and the state by calling
the toll free customer service line at the Office of Devel-
opmental Programs. 1-888-565-9435.
Knowledge is Power!
Wanda
8
Oscar’s Self Determined Life continued from pg. 2
Many people served in the community use the Person Family Directed Supports waiver, which has a cap of
only $30,000.
I know families of people with disabilities were often told that an institution was the best place for their loved
one. They were hidden away “for their own good”. I don’t know why my family chose to keep me at home,
but I am thankful that they did. If I was in an institution I would feel like I was in prison.
When I visit institutions, I tell folks about the supports I get and the life I lead. They have lots of questions
and comments. I will never forget one young man who uses a wheelchair and a communication device.
After talking with him, he said, “if he can do that, so can I!”
Tell legislators to fund the waiting list to keep people out of institutions. It is the right thing to do.
Find us on Facebook at
PA Waiting List Campaign
Waiting List Initiative and Waivers Explained
Submitted by Patricia McCool, Bureau Director Department of Public Welfare, Office of
Developmental Programs, Bureau of Supports for Persons with an Intellectual Disability
This fiscal year brought about an exciting
opportunity for the Office of Developmental
Programs (ODP) to partner with the PA Waiting List
Campaign to implement a waiting list initiative!
Through a very successful series of discussions,
the Governor and the legislature agreed to support
this waiting list for 430 individuals though the
Consolidated Waiver and 700 through the PFDS
Waiver.
The Consolidated Waiver initiative was
designed to primarily support individuals who were
on the waiting list who also had at least one elderly
caregiver. The PFDS initiative was designated to
support individuals who were graduating in June
2012 who would need services to continue to grow
in their own community. Through further discus-
sions with the budget office, ODP staff learned that
while we could enroll more individuals than were
included in the initiatives, we could not exceed the
amount of funding that was allocated.
ODP staff did meet with the budget office staff
and proposed to use a small portion of the
Consolidated Waiver capacity to address the
needs of individuals who meet the criteria con-
tained in the unanticipated emergency category.
This was approved by the budget office.
ODP requested that the Administrative Entities
(AE) submit the names of the individuals in their
county who were graduating in June 2012 who
would be able to utilize the PFDS Waiver to meet
their needs, the graduating individuals who would
require Consolidated Waiver Capacity and the
same information for any individual who had
graduated in June 2011 who remained on the
PUNS list as unserved.
A similar list was requested from the AE was to
identify individuals in the Emergency Category of
PUNS who had at least one elderly caregiver who
would need the Consolidated waiver to
address their needs, and who would need the PFDS Waiver to meet their needs. continued on pg. 15
9
Last year we received $17.8 M for the waiting list. That meant every one of the 700 High School
graduates should have received funding. 400 aging caregivers in emergency category who are over 60
should have received funding. This year the announcement was made that $20 Million will be made
available.
How Can We Support the Waiting List?
1. Call, email, write or visit your legislator.
2. You might need to do this many times.
3. You need to get your friends and neighbors
on board to support this cause.
4. Visit pawaitinglistcampaign.org website
and visit on Facebook.
5. Take your son, daughter, or best friend
with you on legislative visits.
When Do We Begin?
1. Now is a good time to begin fostering a rela-
tionship and informing your legislator about
the need for adequate funding.
2. Watch timing. There are certain times of the
year when activities must happen. That’s
when we ask you to put some extra ‘oomph’
into making those calls or visits.
What Should You Avoid?
1. Talking about many issues at once. Focus.
2. Lot’s of small talk. You have 20 minutes to get your message across.
3. Never threaten. You want to be able to work with and go back to the legislator.
4. Guessing at answers. If you do not know the answer, say so. Then state that you will find
out the correct information and get back to them. They’ll respect your honesty.
5. Going to the meeting unprepared. You can pull information off the PA website or call the
office for more information. It helps to go in prepared.
Always, Always, Always, say “thank you.”
What Do We Need To Do Now?
continued from pg. 1
Meet Stacie! continued from pg. 5
Stacie also has been serving the past 2 years as assistant track coach. Stacie helps set up the hurdles and
other events. She says that she helps with everything. Even when it is cold and rainy, she goes to the track
meets. She gives papers for keeping score to the score keeper. Another job is to tell Starter when you are
ready the runners are ready.
Stacie has also participated in Key Club through the school and works at the local theatre. She gets to clean
and gets to see people. Stacie says she has lots of free tickets to go to the movies.
Without funding for Home and Community Based Waivers, Stacy will lose out on all of the connections she
has been able to make through her school and community. Stacie would lose out on her “Everyday Life.”
10
Join the PA Waiting List Campaign listserve.
Send your email addresses to
Sheila Stasko [email protected]
Troy is in need of funding so he can be supported
out in the community after graduation. With this
funding he can put his transitional skills from school
to work and so he can be a productive member of
our community. He is also in need of funding so he
can receive the necessary services and supports
that he needs so he can continue to live at home
with us and remain healthy and safe when no one
else in our home is available to be with him.
The funding for Troy would be a life line for him and
our family so he can live his everyday life out in the
community where he belongs and to be as inde-
pendent as possible. We are asking you to please
provide the necessary funding for Troy so our family
can stay whole and allow the rest of us to continue
to keep our jobs so we can provide for our family
and not have to be forced to rely on the welfare
system for other services.
M y son, Troy Morgan is 21 and
participated in his graduation ceremonies in 2011
with his classmates. He returned to school for the
past two years to finish his education. Now that
he is 21, he will have no choice but to exit the
education system this year.
Troy has worked very hard for the past 4 years
with his hearing support teacher to transition him
into the adult community. Troy has always been
accepted in our community. He has twin brothers
who had participated in sports while in school
and Troy attended their activities with us a family.
Our twins both opted to go to a nearby college so
they could live at home and continue to help us
with Troy as much as they could. The twins grad-
uated from college in December 2012 and now
have jobs working in the gas field. Troy’s dad and
I both work also.
In June of 2013 when the educational doors
close for Troy it will be impossible for us, as a
family, to continue to provide the 24/7 constant
supervision that Troy requires and yet remain
healthy and safe at home or in the community.
Bob and I have jobs which require extensive trav-
el and some overnight stays. Providing care for
Troy became a problem when the twins left home
for employment and would work up to 14 hours a
day, for several weeks at a time.
The Graduate submitted by Mary Saunders, Parent
Blake Troy Grant
11
Shared living continued from pg. 4
Many adults with disabilities and families of people of intellectual disabilities look forward to having a dia-
logue with the Office of Developmental Programs to develop policy on family members as life-sharers. If
the Office of Developmental Programs is sincere about putting the best practices of Everyday Lives and
Self-Determination into action, then family members as life-sharers presents an exciting opportunity!
Maintaining Momentum for Graduates by Nancy Richey, Parent
When a young adult with intellectual disabilities ages
out of the school system at 21, it is a critical time to
keep up the momentum and action toward finding his
or her place in the community, be in the workplace or
other type of day activities. Over the past several
years there has been a waiting list initiative in the
state budget that is intended to enroll these new
graduates into Medicaid waivers as quickly as
possible. The idea is that here is where we can
begin to end the wait and most meaningfully, and
cost effectively, launch real lives in the community
setting.
This is a wonderful thing indeed. However, by nature
of when those funds become available, there is a six-
month lag period for graduates and their families
between when they are informed that they will be
receiving the waiver and when they actually
receive it. So, during those six months of waiting,
families are forced to piece together support for their
graduate. This can mean that either parent might
have to quit working to stay at home with their son or
daughter, creating the ripple effect of lost
income for the family and even loss of their home.
Not to mention, the hard-earned skills and strengths
of the graduate are lost due to lack of structure and
continued learning, thus wasting years and years of
educational investment in that individual student.
Plus, mental health issues can quickly arise due to
the idle time, isolation, and disappointment.
A simple solution would be to budget funds
EARLIER for the student approaching gradua-
tion. For instance, if Mary is in scheduled to
finish high school in June 2015, what if her
waiver funding was budgeted for a half year
before graduation so that there could be a
gapless and seamless transition to her life in the
community? Yes, this would take some careful
planning, but it would most definitely best serve
our young adults, preserve our families and
homes, and simply make the most sense in
terms of the passage from the educational
system to the community system of services
and supports.
12
Meet the Carasiti Family Submitted by Tom and Teri Carasiti
W e live in Pike County and are the parents of
3 sons. Our youngest, Glenn, is age 21 and is
intellectually disabled. Last June, Glenn graduat-
ed from Wallenpaupack Area High School. Prior
to graduation, we were devastated to learn his
development would end and he would be on a
waiting list with about 15,000 others hoping for
programs or services. It was difficult to imagine
that after an investment of 18 years of specialized
education and countless task repetitions, Glenn
would be idle at home without a
chance to use or develop new
skills. Glenn was facing adulthood
with no hope for work and opportu-
nities to pursue his place in a
productive community.
With thanks to Vision for Equality,
other advocates around the state,
and our executive and
legislative leaders, funding was
added to the state’s budget to address graduates
and other emergency candidates on the waiting
list. This fall Glenn was able to return to the shel-
tered work program where he was previously
trained during his last 2 years of high school.
The funds have made all the difference for Glenn.
Like the rest of us, he feels so much more self-
worth having a job and saving for things he likes,
e.g. train or super hero magazines, DVDs, electric
piano, clothes with his favorite tractor logos, and
much more. Human Resource Center in Pike
County created the work program. It’s a ware-
house where Glenn and his peers package, label,
and box products for eleven area businesses.
Some of the products end up on shelves in na-
tional chain stores throughout the country. He is
exceptionally proud, in his own words: “I’m an
adult, I’m responsible, and I have a job.
We pay him $10 a day which he saves for his next
purchase goal. He recently bought an electric fire-
place and heater for his room and is now saving for
four late 1990s train catalogs. If not for the admin-
istration finding the funds, he would be home idle and
regressing in skills, development, self esteem and
ultimately depression would be added to his many
challenges in life. Without state and federal funding
for these programs, Glenn would have sixty years
ahead of him with no goals or dreams.
Every year Glenn makes a
Christmas list. He has no
problem with ideas and it’s
usually at least a full page
long. He’ll start in October
and adds to the list right up to
Christmas. This year it was
December and he hadn’t
started his list. We asked him,
“Glenn, where’s your Christ-
mas list?” His answer, “No, I don’t need a Christmas
list. I have a job. I make money and can buy things.”
Though severely intellectually disabled, Glenn has
made the connection between working and having
pride in what he’s accomplished through his earnings.
Additionally, the funding has helped many families
avoid the terrible decision of which parent quits work
to remain at home with their adult son or daughter;
possibly reducing a household income by 50% and
risk losing their home. Or making a single parent
choose between going on welfare or keeping their job
but risking their son or daughter’s safety being home
alone.
We’ll continue to work with Vision for Equality to en-
courage our state’s leaders to provide for others who
need programs or services to participate in their
communities.
13
Restore Human Services Funding: Support HB 315 Submitted by PAWL
Repesentative Gene DiGirolamo, (R) Bucks Coun-
ty, chair of the House Human Services Committee
has introduced House Bill 315, a
supplemental appropriation bill that restores
$84 million in Human Services funding that was
cut as part of the fiscal year 2012-2013 state
budget. If it passes, the cuts would be restored
immediately, making a critical difference for many
individuals and behavioral health organizations
across the state.
In his memorandum to the General Assembly,
DiGirolamo says, “This legislation will return the
line items to their funding levels from FY 11/12.
There is sufficient money on the balance sheet for
this fiscal year that allows us to make these badly
needed restorations without adversely affecting
our cushion for the current year or impeding the
carry over for next fiscal year”.
As of February 2013, the following representatives
have signed on:
DiGirolamo, Bishop, O'brien, Pashinski, Parker,
Brownlee, Haluska, O'Neill, Haggerty, Neilson, Der-
mody, Boback, Longietti, V. Brown, Stephens, God-
shall, Santarsiero, Millard, Cohen, Scavello, Carroll,
Readshaw, Schlossberg, Caltagirone, Hess, Kortz,
Thomas, Gibbons, Murt, Mahoney, Hahn, Kinsey,
Youngblood, Deluca, Molchany, Matzie, Galloway,
Fabrizio, Cruz, Delissio, Maher, Simmons, P. Daley,
Freeman, R. Brown, Harkins, Heffley, Ravenstahl,
Deasy, Schlegel Culver, Quinn, Briggs, Davidson,
Goodman, B. Boyle, Farry, Dean, Bradford, Sims,
Sturla, Neuman, Snyder, Reese, D. Costa, White and
Kula.
If your representative is not in this list, urge him/her
to support HB 315 to restore the funding that was cut
last fiscal year. If your representative is on
the list, thank him/her.
YOU can make a difference. Write a letter to your representative or visit him/her and tell your story. Describe
how the cuts have impacted the life of your loved one and your family. Explain how the funding restoration will
help. This is an opportunity to restore Human Services funding and prevent more cuts and to make a
critical difference for many individuals and behavioral health organizations across the state. Act NOW!
Tom Corbett Sheila Stasko
Governor PAWL Manager
14
PUNS continued from pg. 6
After conversation with the PA Waiting List Campaign, ODP determined that 75% of the PFDS Capacity and
60% of the Consolidated Capacity (minus the 50 held back for unanticipated emergencies) would be commit-
ted to the AEs based on the data they submitted. Following those guidelines, ODP distributed 523
waiver capacity to the AEs to address individuals who graduated in June 2012 who would have their needs
best served through the PFDS Waiver. For individuals with an elderly caregiver, 228 capacity was committed
to the community. Additionally, two AEs identified that they had no need for Consolidated Waiver but could
support 12 individuals with an elderly caregiver through the PFDS and those capacity were distributed.
ODP also worked with the Waiting List Campaign to identify which entity of the Partnership would be respon-
sible for providing training to new enrollees and their families to ensure they understand the waiver and what
is provided, as well as the ISP process. That information was distributed to each AE with their Capacity Com-
mitment letters.
As of the beginning of February, 293 individuals were enrolled in the PFDS for the graduate initiative and 10
for the elderly caregiver category. In the Consolidated Waiver 141 individuals have been enrolled in the elder-
ly caregiver initiative.
If you need services within 5 years, you need a PUNS form. It’s just that simple. If you need a service, make
sure your supports coordinator marks it “yes”. If you need services immediately (within 6 months), make sure
you are in the Emergency Category. Sounds simple, but clearly some mistakes have been made.
The forms should reflect your situation accurately. You can answer YES to as many situations that apply to
you. Make sure you review the Final HCSIS form that is mailed to you after the meeting to check for mis-
takes. Make sure you have the dates your child is aging out of children’s services or graduating from school
reflected on the form. Make sure that you understand what you can do if you disagree with the way the Sup-
ports Coordinator submitted your information.
For more information on how the form is supposed to be used, visit www.The Training Partnership.org
website to look at the PUNS Manual or read the quick FAQ regarding the PUNS form. You can request
information and ask questions through your Supports Coordinator and their supervisor.
PAWL welcomes Bev Makereth as new
Acting Secretary of the
Department of Public Welfare.
and
Fred Lokuta as Deputy Secretary,
Office of Developmental Programs
15
Time to PUSH the Name Change...
From the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
to the Department of Human Services to
help change public perception and to better
reflect the programs it manages.
URGENT!
LET’S GET THIS DONE!
CONTACT YOUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE AND
ASK THEM TO SIGN ON TO
REPRESENTATIVE TOM MURT’S BILL.
We Can.
We Will.
We Must.
End the Wait!
Governor Speaks continued from pg. 1
Brittany Stevens is here today with her
mother, Harlena Morton. Harlena wakes up at 4:30
every morning. She makes sure Brittany has physi-
cal therapy. She makes sure Brittany has a lunch
ready for later in the day.
All Brittany wanted was a chance to work, to
have the same opportunity as the rest of us. She
might have needed our help, but because we gave
her that help last year, she is ready to chart her own
course. A course fueled by courage,
passion and an independent spirit.
Because of our commitment last year,
Brittany is now off the waiting list. Her story and
those of so many parents and sisters and
brothers are tales of the every-day heroism shown
by the families and friends of our neighbors with
special needs.
That waiting list is a powerful metaphor for what
has gone wrong in our society. We need to act now
and we must not turn our backs on all the other Brit-
tany's who are out there currently on the waiting list.
That is why I am counting on the General Assembly
to join with me to make certain we pass this next
round of funding for expanded services for people
with intellectual disabilities.”
Waiting List Initiative and Waivers
Explained
continued from pg. 8
In the next few weeks, ODP will be distrib-
uting the remainder of the waiting list initiative capac-
ity to the Administrative Entities. The priorities for the
graduates will be any newly identified individuals
who graduated in June 2012, any individuals who
graduated in June 2010 or 2011 and then individuals
who will graduate in June 2013 who are on the emer-
gency wait list and are identified by the Administra-
tive Entity as being the highest priority.
The remainder of the Consolidated Waiver waiting list initiative capacity for the individuals who meet the elderly caregiver criteria will be distributed based on the identification by the Administrative Entities.
Overall, this has been a wonderfully collabo-
rative experience. We are ready to wrap up FY 12-13
and move on to a new initiative for FY 13-14! Thanks
to all the work the PA Waiting List campaign has
done to secure these wonderful opportunities for the
citizens of Pennsylvania!
16
Pennsylvania Waiting List Campaign Headquarters
4540 Best Station Road Slatington, PA 18080
Phone: 267-765-0301
www.pawaitinglistcampaign.org
Number of People Waiting
Total: 15,132 Emergency: 4,187
Critical: 6,694 Planning: 4,251
PUNS: 01.31.2013
Funded by
The Disability
Rights Network
of
Pennsylvania
Vision for Equality, Inc.
For the PA Waiting List Campaign
718 Arch Street, 6N
Philadelphia, PA 19106