56
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Government Policy and Government Policy and Market Failures Market Failures

Government Policy and Market Failures

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

about market failures

Citation preview

Government Policy and Market FailuresGovernment Policy and Market Failures
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Laugher Curve
Q. How many economists does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A. Eight. One to screw it in and seven to hold everything else constant.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Introduction
Economists use the invisible hand framework to determine whether the government should intervene in the market.
Invisible hand framework – perfectly competitive markets lead individuals to make voluntary choices that are in society’s interest.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Market Failures
Market failure – the invisible hand pushes in such a way that individual decisions do not lead to socially desirable outcomes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Market Failures
When a market failure exists, government intervention into markets to improve the outcome is justified.
Government failure occurs when government intervention does not improve the situation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Externalities
Externalities are the effect of a decision on a third party that is not taken into account by the decision-maker.
Externalities can be either positive or negative.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Externalities
Negative externalities occur when the effects of a decision not taken into account by the decision-maker are detrimental to others.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Externalities
Positive externalities occur when the effects of a decision not taken into account by the decision-maker is beneficial to others.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Negative Externality Example
When there is a negative externality, marginal social cost is greater than marginal private cost.
A steel plant benefits the owner of the plant and the buyers of steel.
The plant’s neighbors are made worse off by the pollution caused by the plant.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Negative Externality Example
Marginal social cost includes all the marginal costs borne by society.
It is the marginal private costs of production plus the cost of the negative externalities associated with that production.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Negative Externality Example
When there are negative externalities, the competitive price is too low and equilibrium quantity too high to maximize social welfare.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Negative Externality
A Positive Externality Example
Private trades can benefit third parties not involved in the trade.
A person who is working and taking night classes benefits himself directly, and his co-workers indirectly.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Positive Externality Example
Marginal social benefit equals the marginal private benefit of consuming a good plus the positive externalities resulting from consuming that good.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Positive Externality
D0 = Marginal private benefit
D1 = Marginal social benefit
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Alternative Methods of Dealing with Externalities
Externalities can be dealt with via:
Direct regulation.
Incentive policies.
Voluntary solutions.
Direct Regulation
Direct regulation –the amount of a good people are allowed to use is directly limited by the government.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Direct Regulation
Direct regulation is inefficient, not efficient.
Inefficient – achieving a goal in a more costly manner than necessary.
Efficient achieving a goal at the lowest cost in total resources without consideration as to who pays those costs.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Incentive Policies
Incentive policies are more efficient than direct regulatory policies.
The two types of incentive policies are either taxes or market incentives.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Tax Incentive Policies
A tax incentive program uses a tax to create incentives for individuals to structure their activities in a way that is consistent with the desired ends.
The tax often yields the desired end more efficiently than straight regulation.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Tax Incentive Policies
This solution embodies a measure of fairness about it – the person who conserves the most pays the least tax.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Tax Incentive Policies
A way to handle pollution is through a tax called an effluent fee.
Effluent fees – charges imposed by government on the level of pollution created.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Regulation Through Taxation
Marginal social benefit
Marginal private cost
Marginal social cost
Market Incentive Policies
Market incentive program – market participants certify they have reduced total consumption – their own and/or other’s – by a specified amount.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Market Incentive Policies
A market incentive program is similar to the regulatory solution.
The amount of the good consumed is reduced.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Market Incentive Policies
A market incentive program differs from a regulatory solution.
Individuals who reduce consumption by more than the required amount receive marketable certificates that can be sold to others.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Voluntary Reductions
Voluntary reductions allow individuals to choose whether to follow what is socially optimal or what is privately optimal.
Economists are dubious of voluntary solutions.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Voluntary Reductions
A person’s willingness to do things for the good of society generally depends on the belief that others will also be helping.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Voluntary Reductions
The socially conscious will often lose their social conscience when they believe a large number of other people are not contributing.
This is example of a free rider problem – individuals’ unwillingness to share in the cost of a public good.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Optimal Policy
An optimal policy is one in which the marginal cost of undertaking the policy equals the marginal benefit of that policy.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Optimal Policy
Resources are being wasted if a policy isn’t optimal.
What is saved by reducing the program is worth more than what is lost from the reducing the program.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Optimal Policy
Some environmentalists want to totally eliminate pollution.
Economists want to reduce pollution to the point where marginal costs of reducing pollution equals the marginal benefits.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Optimal Policy
Optimal level of pollution – the amount of pollution at which the marginal benefit of reducing pollution equals the marginal cost.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Public Goods
Nonexclusive – no one can be excluded from its benefits.
Nonrival – consumption by one does not preclude consumption by others.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Public Goods
The closest example is national defense.
Technology can change the public nature of goods.
Roads are an example.
Public Goods
Once a pure public good is supplied to one individual, it is simultaneously supplied to all.
A private good is only supplied to the individual who bought it.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Public Goods
With private goods, the focus is on the individual.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Public Goods
In the case of a public good, the social benefit of a public good is the sum of the individual benefits.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Public Goods
Adding demand curves vertically is easy to do in textbooks, but not in practice.
This is because individuals do not buy public goods directly so that their demand is not revealed in their actions.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Market Value of a Public Good
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
0.50
Price
1
2
3
Quantity
.80
.60
.40
.20
1.00
Informational Problems
Real-world markets often involve deception, cheating, and inaccurate information.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Informational Problems
When there is a lack of information, buyers and sellers do not have equal information, markets may not work properly.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Informational Problems
Economists call such market failures adverse selection problems.
Adverse selection problems – problems that occur when a buyer or a seller have different amounts of information about the good for sale.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Policies to Deal with Informational Problems
Regulate the market and see that individuals provide the correct information.
Government licenses individuals in the market and requires them to provide full information about the good being sold.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Market in Information
Information is valuable, and is an economic product in its own right.
Left on their own, markets will develop to provide information that people need and are willing to pay for it.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Market in Information
If the government regulates information, then markets for information will not develop.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Licensing of Doctors
Currently all doctors practicing medicine are required to be licensed.
Licensing of doctors is justified by informational problems.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Licensing of Doctors
Some economists argue that licensure laws were established to restrict supply, not to help the consumer.
Instead of licensing doctors, the government could give the public information about which treatments work and which do not.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Licensing of Doctors
Providing information rather than licensing would give rise to consumer sovereignty.
Consumer sovereignty – the right of the individual to make choices about what is consumed and produced.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
An Informational Alternative to Licensure
In this scenario, the government would require doctors to post their:
Grades in college.
References.
An Informational Alternative to Licensure
This information alternative would provide much more useful information to the public than the present licensing procedure.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Government Failures and Market Failures
Market failures should not automatically call for government intervention.
Why? Because governments fail too.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Government Failures and Market Failures
Government failure occurs when the government intervention in the market to improve the market failure actually makes the situation worse.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Reasons for Government Failures
Governments do not have an incentive to correct the problem.
Governments do not have the information to deal with the problem.
Intervention in the markets is almost always more complicated than it initially looks.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Reasons for Government Failures
The bureaucratic nature of government intervention does not allow fine tuning.
Government intervention leads to more government intervention.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
THANK YOU