Upload
jamuna
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Welcome to Stockholm Resilience Centre – Research for Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Governance networks in a changing climate. Christian Stein Symposium The Governance of Adaptation 22 -23 March 2012 - Amsterdam, Netherlands . Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Welcome to Stockholm Resilience Centre– Research for Governance of Social-Ecological Systems
Governance networks in a changing climate
Christian Stein
Symposium The Governance of Adaptation22-23 March 2012 - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Outline
1. Why a network perspective might be useful2. Social network analysis as a method & theory 3. Agricultural water management an example4. Preliminary findings and reflections
Governance of adaptation…
• involves a range of actors related to each other through complex governance arrangements, i.e. networks
Figure: adapted from Bodin and Crona 2009
Adaptive governance
• recognize the crucial role of cross-scale interactions and argue for tapping into or establishing boundary spanning social networks
• entails “an implicit assumption about the establishment of social networks“, i.e. a notion of network management or network governance.
Carlsson and Sandström 2008
Why a network perspective?
• Adaptation strategies are often biophysically and/or socially linked
• Functional interdependencies occur, and• Actors are forced to operate in the context of
networks to find comprehensive solutions to interconnected problems
Source: Young 2002; Koppenjan and Klijn 2004
• Can be used for analyzing across different sectors and scales
• Focuses on relationships between social entities and the implications of these relationships
Figure: Ernstson et al 2010
Social network analysis
Social networks…• are more than just neat pictures
(also analytical)
1 2 3 4 5 6 ROW | Attributes
6
5
4
3
2
1
CO
LUM
N
25 Female
23 Male
22 Male
56 Female
18 Female
Governance networks are:
• reoccurring (formally or informally) institutionalized relationships that shape governance processes and outcomes
Source: Newig et al 2010
The AgWater Solutions Project
Aims to improve the livelihoods of poor and marginalized smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia through agricultural water management (AWM) solutions.
Agriculture in a changing climate
Burkina Faso: Relation between rainfall and cereal production
The need for adaptation
• Dry spells impact yields 2 out of every 3 harvests and cause the failure of 1 out of 5 in sub-Saharan Africa
• Increasing variability in precipitation patterns and extreme weather events due to climate change
• Agricultural water management -key for adaptation to climate change
Stylized networks illustrating the network approach
Analyse the social network structure
Identify opportunities and constrains
Figure: Ernstson et al 2010
Summary of case study areas
Country Watershed No of actors (surveyed)
Size (km2)
Burkina Faso Nariale 76 1060Tanzania Mkindo 70 913Zambia Mwembeshi 71 4118
Basic building blocks for modelling a system as a network• Actors
o Organizations influencing NRM in the watersheds• Relationships
o Reciprocated collaborative relationships regarding NRM
• Attributes o Type of organization, up-/downstream, scale etc.
• Boundarieso “Problemsheds” (def. spatially and relationally)
Data collection
• Social-ecological inventory• Interviews, group
discussions and organisational survey
• Multi-scale assessment, complemented by PGIS livelihood assessment and hydrological modelling
Networks of collaborative relations
Key actors in the system
Cohesive subgroups
Tanzania, Mkindo
Findings
• Informal networks play a crucial role in the management and governance of natural resources
• Local (informal) governance arrangements are often not recognized by higher level authorities
Finding cont.
• At the landscape level the social networks become more fragmented, i.e. limited horizontal interaction
• Local governance arrangements are often disconnected from the broader (formal) governance context, i.e. limited vertical interaction
Implications for the governance of adaptation
• Lack of clear implementation pathways • Adaptation strategies should acknowledge and
may benefit from building upon existing social structures
• Social network analysis provides a promising approach to systematically describe and analyse certain aspects of social complexity
Some reflections
• Social network analysis– is an interesting approach to systematically describe
and analyse multi-actor and multi-scalar governance arrangements
– can makes hidden actors and relationships visible – does not capture the political nature of (cross scale)
interactions, e.g. weak conceptualization of power
Thank you for listening!
Future research
• Scale-crossing brokers– A quantitative approach
• Intermediary & boundary organizations – What functions do they perform and why?
• The problem of institutional fit– Politics of rescaling
Social networks - just one perspective
Overall research context
How to…balance water for humans and nature in agricultural systems
Multi scalar challenge
Figure: Barron 2008
Cross-scale interactions in SES
Figure: adapted from Ernstson 2010
Cross-scale interactions
Figure: Cash et al 2006
Scale
• Multi-scale assessment
• Focal scale – Meso-scale (10-
10.000km2)
Research questions
• What actors are there? • How do they relate to each other:
– Horizontally, and – Vertically
• Who are the influential actors? • What influence do relational patterns have on
governance process and outcomes?
Analytical dimension
• Institutional interplay – Horizontally – Vertically
• Key actors– Influence– Scale crossing
brokers