Upload
magdalen-lambert
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Governance issues in the central bank investment function: the case of Banca d’Italia
Sovereign Investment PartnershipsExecutive Forum on Central Bank Reserves
and Official Sector Asset Management
Washington, April 27-29, 2009
Franco Passacantando, Managing DirectorCentral Banking, Markets and Payment System Area
2
USD 27,3%*
GOLD 60,2%
GBP 5,2%
YEN 5,8%
CHF 0,3%
Source: Annual Report
*The figure includes temporary operations in USD, carried out within the USD Term Auction Facility programme, for an amount of USD 6.141 mln.
Official reserves(forex EUR 32,4 bln; gold EUR 48,9 bln)
Investment portfolio(EUR 91,0 bln)
Funds & ETFs 1%Equities 5,2%
Other bonds 0,3%
Govt. Bonds 93,6%
Others 1,2%
Banca d’Italia’s financial portfolios(as of Dec 31st 2008)
3
The main drivers of change
Changing environment
Weakening of the links between reserve management and foreign exchange policy, after the introduction of the euro as a single currency
Growing importance of the return generated by the Bank’s foreign reserves and investment portfolio
Pressure to increase efficiency , effectiveness
Enhance specialization
Avoid duplications and exploit synergies
Enhancing horizontal and vertical governance
Enhance independence of risk management and control
Protect governing bodies from reputational risk
4
The recent reform (Dec. 2008)
NOW BEFORE
Risk Management Department
Middle Office
(RM e asset allocation, Op. Risk)
Financial Investment Department
Front Office Back Office
Central Banking Department
Mon. Pol. ELA
Mon. Policy and Exch.Rate Dept.
Mon. Pol. Reserves(F.O., B.O., M.O.)
Asset Management Dept.
Own Fund(F..O., B.O., M.O.)
ELA
5
Departments involved and respective functions
Central Banking Department: monetary policy operations, foreign exchange interventions, financial stability-related functions (ELA).
Financial Investment Department: investment of the Bank's own funds, foreign currencies, gold reserves and reserves held on behalf of the ECB.
Risk Management Department: assessment and control of financial and operational risk on all assets of the Bank; proposals for strategic and tactical asset allocation.
7
1. The merger between reserve management and own funds management activities
Why?
Integrated approach towards asset management
Efficiency reasons
Increasing similarities between fx reserve portfolio and investment portfolio
Exploit the synergies arising from the concentration of investment activities within a single team
Avoid duplications and costs related to the ‘twin’ dealing rooms (we merged 3 dealing rooms into a single one!)
Moving towards an integrated risk management approach at enterprise-wide level
8
The merger between reserve management and own funds management activities (ctd.)
The institutional reasons why a central bank holds foreignreserves and own funds are different.
Foreign reserves must be characterised by a particularly low risk return profile and high liquidity.
The merger between operational and decision making structures does not prevent the definition of different profiles for different components of the portfolio.
However, risks of using ‘inside information’ can be mitigated.
Issues
9
2. The separation between investment activity and monetary policy implementation
An adequate degree of segregation mitigates the risk that inside information about monetary policy actions is used when performing investment activities (Chinese Wall) Reputational benefits
Synergies arising by single structures and unique teams for monetary policy and investments are very limited, as the two activities are quite different by nature.
Why?
Issues
One back office for monetary policy (whose volumes have increased enormously with the recent financial crisis), one back office for investments A duplication to be avoided?
Financial stability-related activities (ELA) are increasingly linked with monetary policy operations.
10
3. The separation of the risk management function from operational activities
Why?
Achieve a higher degree of independence of the risk manager/controller
Stimulate a constructive ‘debate’ between risk managers and portfolio managers
Issues
Excessive distance between risk managers and portfolio managers may exacerbate tensions and develop diverging professionalities
Single reporting line at the level of Managing Director
High-level coordination achieved through Risk and Investment Committees
11
The decision making process for the investment offoreign reserves and own funds – The Committees
Strategic and Financial Risk Committee
Members
Main Activities
One Board Member (Chairman)Managing Directors for: Central Banking, Markets and Payment Systems, Economic Research, Accounting and Control AreasHeads of: Risk Dept., Investment Dept., Central Banking Dept.
Supports the Governor’s decisions on investments. Assesses the Bank’s strategic asset allocation and risk budgeting. Evaluates investment results. Strenghtens the consistency between the Bank’s financial decisions and its balance-sheet developments.
Frequency Semi-annual
12
The Committees (ctd.)
Investment Committee
Members Managing Director for Central Banking, Markets and Payment Systems Area (Chairman) Heads of: Risk Dept., Investment Dept., Central Banking Dept. Two members of the Research Department.
Main activities Assesses the tactical allocation of investments in foreign reserves and
own funds. Evaluates results for each investment portfolio.
Frequency Bi-monthly
13
The decision making process - Interactions
GOVERNORStrategic and Financial Risks Committee (SFRC)
Investment Committee
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS
Strategic asset alloc.Risk budget/limits
Tactical bmks (within the limits set by
SFRC)
PROPOSAL
APPROVAL
Risk Management Dep. Strategic Benchmark
ProposalsRisk Management
Dep.
Tactical Benchmark Proposals
Active management by Investment Dep.