Upload
cornelius-mckinney
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Going NegativeThe 2015-2016 Surveillance Topic
Outline for the topic
I. Categories of neg ground
-Go over the specific arguments we have
II. Dealing with Advantages
III. Thoughts on the Topic
I. Categories of Neg Ground
OR – how surveillance could possibly be good / plan bad.
A. Political reasons
B. Economic Benefits
C. Surveillance Good
D. Theoretical/philosophical
A. Political Reasons we shouldn’t curtail
Politics DisadTrade-off DisadUS Credibility Based DisadsPresidential Power
The Nationalized Internet Disad
US pushing for multi-stakeholderNo one trusts us because
surveillanceNationalized internet good
B. Economic Reasons we shouldn’t
Spending/Budget Trade-offsAff specific Economic Benefits – tech companies, etc.
The Offshoring Disad
What is offshoring? Tech and IT companies leaving And developing foreign companies – brazil, euro-
cloud Surveillance fears driving those decisions Offshoring good for the economy
C. Surveillance Good
What we are looking for, we need to know
What is the reason the government is doing it – defenders of the government
The Terrorism Disad
Surveillance is done to prevent terror plots
Several justifications- get intelligence on ongoing plots
- get information on people
- deter people
- having to get a warrant is slow
Terrorism unchecked would be bad
Theoretical/Philosophical Problems
Kritiks – arguments about the justifications of the plan OR advantages
- Don’t trust the government – - A. will use new rights to exploit you- B. racist / gendered / etc
- Rights for Who? –
- Security Based Decision Making –
- Capitalist / Neoliberal
The ‘Borders’ Kritik
The aff is necessarily about ‘domestic surveillance’- Protect americans at the expense of
others- Won’t have rights if we say who doesn’t
have them- Universal understanding of rights is
better
II. Dealing With Advantages
What are the big categories of advantages to expect: US international credibility Rights / Democracy / Tyranny People being mistreated Surveillance fails / backfires
Options for Answering Advantages
Impact Defense – Be prepared to minimize that listBe prepared to compare
Counterplans – something else to solve those advantages
Solvency Based Answers – the plan doesn’t solve that problem
III. Thoughts on the Topic
A. What can we expect to debate The topic is proposed to be about
Wiretapping/NSA/Secrecy The topic will be about other forms
Immigration / borders Drugs – War on Drugs, FDA, etc. Weather/NASA Crime/Policing
B. How do I prepare to go negative?- list of advantages to answer
- what is your neg position
- Does your neg position apply to all of the affs?
- Topicality
- Add another neg position
- Make sure your approach is well rounded
C. Your judging pool wants to vote aff