17
Glycolysis Inhibition and its Effect of Doxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblas- toma Jonathan F. Bean, Yi-Yong Qui, Songtau Yu, Sandra Clark, Fei Chu, Mary Beth Madonna PII: S0022-3468(14)00046-3 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.037 Reference: YJPSU 56668 To appear in: Journal of Pediatric Surgery Received date: 24 January 2014 Accepted date: 27 January 2014 Please cite this article as: Bean Jonathan F., Qui Yi-Yong, Yu Songtau, Clark Sandra, Chu Fei, Madonna Mary Beth, Glycolysis Inhibition and its Effect of Doxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblastoma, Journal of Pediatric Surgery (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.037 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

�������� ����� ��

Glycolysis Inhibition and its Effect of Doxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblas-toma

Jonathan F. Bean, Yi-Yong Qui, Songtau Yu, Sandra Clark, Fei Chu,Mary Beth Madonna

PII: S0022-3468(14)00046-3DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.037Reference: YJPSU 56668

To appear in: Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Received date: 24 January 2014Accepted date: 27 January 2014

Please cite this article as: Bean Jonathan F., Qui Yi-Yong, Yu Songtau, ClarkSandra, Chu Fei, Madonna Mary Beth, Glycolysis Inhibition and its Effect ofDoxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblastoma, Journal of Pediatric Surgery (2014), doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.037

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.

Page 2: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Glycolysis Inhibition and its Effect of Doxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblastoma

Jonathan F. Bean1,2

, Yi-Yong Qui2, Songtau Yu

2, Sandra Clark

2,

Fei Chu2, Mary Beth Madonna

1,2

Institutions:

1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of

Chicago

2. Cancer Biology and Epigenetics, Children’s Hospital of Chicago Research Center

Corresponding Authors: Fei Chu, Mary Beth Madonna

Mailing Address:

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Department of Pediatric Surgery

225 E. Chicago Avenue, Box 63

Chicago, IL 60611

Email Addresses: [email protected]; [email protected]

Page 3: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract

Background/Purpose: A common trait among cancers is the increased level of glycolysis

despite adequate oxygen levels to support aerobic respiration. This has been shown

repeatedly in different human malignancies. Glycolysis inhibitors, especially 3-

bromopyruvate, have been shown to be effective chemotherapeutic agents. The effect of

glycolysis inhibition upon chemotherapy resistance is relatively unknown.

Methods: Wild-type and doxorubicin-resistant lines of neuroblastoma (SK-N-SH and SK-

N-Be(2)C) were used in this study. Using an MTT assay, the IC50 of 3-BrPA was

determined. Subsequently, doxorubicin-resistant cell lines were treated with 3-

bromopyruvate, doxorubicin, and 3-bromopyruvate with doxorubicin. Additionally, a

luminescence ATP detection assay was used to measure intracellular ATP levels, and a

lactate assay was used to determine intracellular lactate levels. All experiments were

repeated in hypoxic conditions.

Results: Treatment with 3-bromopyruvate and doxorubicin significantly decreased the

mean cell viabilities at 24, 48, and 72 hours in normoxic conditions. A similar response

was replicated in hypoxic conditions. Treatment with 3-bromopyruvate significantly

decreased intracellular ATP and lactate levels.

Conclusion: Glycolysis inhibitors such as 3-bromopyruvate could prove to become an

effective means by which chemotherapy resistance can be overcome in human

neuroblastoma.

Keywords: glycolysis inhibition; neuroblastoma; ATP; 3-bromopyruvate; doxorubicin;

Page 4: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Introduction

Early in the 20th

century, Warburg showed that a common trait of cancer cells is

the increased metabolic demand and increased utilization of glycolysis for energy

production.[Warburg 1956] This has been shown to be true in cancer cells that are

incubated in ambient oxygen levels ample to support aerobic respiration. As opposed to

non-malignant cells, cancers cells utilize glucose more rapidly, they have increased

production of lactate, and they have decreased demands for oxygen.[Bustamante 1977,

Wolf 2011] This inherent difference between malignant and non-malignant cells offers an

approach to treat cancer that would allow specificity of drug treatment against malignant

cells while sparing the non-malignant cells.

3-Bromopyruvate (3-BrPA), an inhibitor of hexokinase II and thus an inhibitor of

glycolysis, has been shown to be a potent chemotherapeutic agent. [Bhardway 2010,

Geschwind 2002, Levy 2012, Liu 2009, Munoz-Pineda 2003, Pereira 2009, Xu/Pelicano

2005] Many studies have shown the efficacy of 3-BrPA against various tumors,

including: breast, colon, hepatocellular, lymphoma, neuroblastoma, pancreatic, among

other cancers. Furthermore, 3-BrPA has been shown to effective as a monotherapy

against chemotherapy-resistant tumors.

Despite many studies showing the efficacy of glycolytic inhibitors against and

array of cancer cells, there have been relatively few studies examining the effect on

chemotherapeutic-resistant cancers of glycolysis inhibition in conjunction with standard

chemotherapeutic regimens on cancer cell response. One study showed that 3-BrPA

chemopotentiated the effects of platinum-based chemotherapeutics on colon and breast

Page 5: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

cancer cells.[Strandburg 2008] Another study demonstrated that 3-BrPA had a synergistic

effect with rapamycin in treatment of lymphoma and leukemic cells.[Xu/Pelicano 2005]

To date, there have been no studies examining the effects of 3-BrPA on the anti-cancer

effects of doxorubicin (Dox) on Dox-resistant human neuroblastoma.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 3-BrPA upon Dox-resistant

human neuroblastoma cells as well as the effects of 3-BrPA on the response of Dox-

resistant tumor cells to treatment with Dox.

Methods

Human neuroblastoma (SK-N-SH and SK-N-Be(2)C) cell lines were purchased

from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MA). Medium and fetal bovine

serum were obtained from Mediatech (Herndon, VA) and Atlanta Biologicals (Atlanta,

GA), respectively. Doxorubicin (Dox), 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)2,5-diphenyl

tetrazolium bromide (MTT), and 3-bromopyruvic acid (3-BrPA) were purchased from

Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Initially, the IC50 of 3-BrPA was determined for wild-type and Dox-resistant

strains of both SK-N-SH and SK-N-Be(2)C using the MTT (2-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-

yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide) assay. Cells for each cell line were seeded into 96-

well plates (1x103 cells/well) and 3-BrPA was applied in a logarithmic manner from

10-7

M to 10-3

M. Untreated control groups were created for comparison. After 96 hours,

each well of the 96-well plate was treated with MTT (10 µL of 5 mg/ml solution) and

incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. Then 100 µL of 10% SDS/0.01 mmol/L HCL was added

to each well of the 96-well plate in order to solubilize the cells. The plate was then

Page 6: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

incubated for 15 hours at 37°C. The colorimetric absorbance of each well was determined

using an activation wavelength of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 650 nm. Percent

cell viability for each treatment group was compared to the untreated control wells.

Next, cells were plated into four groups (Control, 3-BrPA treatment, Dox

treatment, and 3-BrPA+Dox treatment) using 6-well plates (6x104 cells/well). Each plate

was incubated at 37°C for 24, 48, and 72 hours in normoxic, ambient oxygen, conditions.

After each incubation period, cell viability for each treatment group was determined

using trypan blue staining and cell counting using a hemocytometer.

Subsequently, ATP levels were determined using the ATPLite Luminescence

ATP Assay kit (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). Using white opaque, 96-well CulturPlates

(PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA), cells were plated into each well (1x103 cells/well). Four

treatment groups were created using equivalent concentrations of 3-BrPA, Dox, and 3-

BrPA+Dox as in the 6-well plates. An untreated control group was used for comparison.

After 48 hours of incubation at 37°C in normoxic, ambient oxygen, conditions, the ATP

levels were determined for each treatment group. Initially, 50μL of the provided

mammalian cell lysis solution was added to each well of the microplate and the plates

were mixed on an orbital shaker for 5 minutes to lyse the cells and stabilized the ATP.

50μL of the provided Luciferase/Luciferin substrate solution was applied to each well of

the microplate and mixed on the orbital shaker for 5 minutes. The plate was dark adapted

for 10 minutes and luminescence of each well was measured using a microplate reader to

determine relative ATP levels of each treatment group.

Intracellular lactate levels were determined using a lactate assay kit (Sigma-

Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). In the same manner as the cell viability studies, we plated the

Page 7: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

neuroblastoma cells into 6-well plates and re-created the four treatment groups (Control,

3-BrPA treatment, Dox treatment, and 3-BrPA+Dox treatment). After 48 hours of

incubation at 37°C in normoxic, ambient oxygen, conditions, the intracellular lactate

levels were determined for each treatment group and compared to controls.

Cell viability, ATP level, and intracellular lactate studies were repeated in

hypoxic conditions. This was achieved by incubating the cell culture plates at 37°C in a

modular hypoxia incubator chamber (Billups-Rothenberg, Del Mar, CA) filled with 89%

N2, 10% CO2, 1% O2 gas. The cell viability in hypoxia for SK-N-SH was measured for

each drug treatment group at 12, 24, and 36 hours of incubation in hypoxia; the ATP

level for each drug treatment group was measured after 12 hours of incubation in

hypoxia.

Each experiment was completed three times with differing passages of each cell

line to create experimental replicates.

Results

The IC50 of 3-BrPA for wild-type and Dox-resistant SK-N-SH as well as for SK-

N-Be(2)C was determined by MTT assay. The IC50 of 3-BrPA for SK-N-SH was 3.1x10-

5M and for SK-N-Be(2)C the IC50 was 7.6x10

-6M.

After determination of the IC50 of each cell line, the sub-IC50 treatment

concentrations of drugs for the SK-N-SH cells was chosen to be 2x10-5

M for 3-BrPA and

1x10-5

M for Dox and for SK-N-Be(2)C the drug concentrations of 3-BrPA and Dox were

5x10-6

M and 5x10-5

M, respectively.

The Dox-resistant cells were plated into 6-well culture plates. Four groups were

created including a 3-BrPA treatment group, a Dox treatment group, a 3-BrPA+Dox Fig 1; Table 1

Page 8: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

treatment group, and finally an untreated control group. These groups were incubated at

normoxic conditions for 24, 48, and 72 hours and then using trypan blue staining the cell

viability was determined.

Figure 1 and Table 1 show significant decreases in the mean cell viabilities for

those cells treated with 3-BrPA+Dox compared to those cells treated with either 3-BrPA

or Dox alone. At 24, 48, and 72 hours, 3-BrPA synergizes with Dox to decrease the

overall mean cell viability of those neuroblastoma cells treated with either drug

independently.

We repeated these experiments in hypoxic conditions. As stated previously, for

the SK-N-SH cells, it was necessary to shorten the incubation period due to the increased

susceptibility of that cell line to the effects of hypoxia. As can been seen in Table 1, the

synergistic effects of 3-BrPA in combination with Dox was preserved in hypoxia.

We replicated the 3-BrPA treatment group, Dox treatment group, the 3-

BrPA+Dox treatment group and the control using 96-well white opaque culture plates for

both SK-N-SH and SK-N-Be(2)C for the ATP studies. The results are shown in Table 2.

We saw that treatment with 3-BrPA consistently decreased the total amount of ATP in

both normoxia as well as hypoxia.

Finally, the intracellular lactate studies revealed that treatment with 3-BrPA

decreases lactate levels compared to controls. (Figure 2) This decrease in lactate levels

was significant in normoxic conditions.

Discussion

In this study of the effects of 3-BrPA on Dox-resistance in human neuroblastoma,

we have successfully shown that use of glycolytic inhibitors can effectively overcome the

Table 2

Fig 2

Page 9: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

chemotherapy resistance mechanisms in this cancer and improve its response to treatment

with doxorubicin. Treatment of Dox-resistant neuroblastoma cells with 3-BrPA

significantly improved the response of these cells to treatment with Dox over treatment

with either 3-BrPA or Dox alone. Furthermore, our evidence shows that this effect is

present in both normoxic as well as hypoxic conditions.

Prior studies of the use of glycolytic inhibitors such as 3-BrPA have repeatedly

shown the efficacy of glycolytic inhibitors in the treatment of various malignancies; but

prior to this study, few have focused on the effects of glycolysis inhibition on

chemotherapy resistance. In the 1970’s, multidrug resistance was shown to be mediated

through a transmembrane glycoprotein named P-glycoprotein. [Endicott 1989]

Subsequently, further studies revealed that P-glycoprotein is a member of the ATP-

binding cassette family, functions as an ATPase, and needs ATP in order to function.

[Shapiro 1994] This transmembrane protein actively transports chemotherapeutic drugs

from the intracellular space to the extracellular space conferring chemotherapy resistance.

Chemotherapy resistance in neuroblastoma is mediated through the MDR1 gene and P-

glycoprotein. Since various studies have shown that 3-BrPA decreases the levels of

intracellular ATP, it would be reasonable to assume that these drugs would also have an

effect on chemotherapy resistance. [Geschwind 2004, Ko 2001]

Through our study, we revealed that indeed treatment of Dox-resistant

neuroblastoma cells with 3-BrPA improved the response of those cells to Dox. As tumors

of any cancer often have areas of differing oxygen tensions, it was logical to test if this

effect was also present in hypoxic conditions. We were able to show through incubating

Page 10: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

these cancer cells in hypoxic conditions that the effect of 3-BrPA persisted despite

decreased ambient oxygen.

Through the use of the luminescence ATP detection system, we were able to see

that 3-BrPA decreased the total amount of intracellular ATP. Interestingly, the total

amount of ATP in the SK-N-SH control cell lines were greater that those of the SK-N-

Be(2)C cell lines despite plating equivalent numbers of cells in each ATP study. This

difference is possibly due to a higher baseline metabolic rate in the SK-N-SH cells and

would also account for the increased susceptibility of that line to hypoxia thus

necessitating decreased incubation intervals in the hypoxic chamber.

Finally, the lactate assay revealed that intracellular lactate levels were decreased

in our neuroblastoma lines when glycolysis was inhibited with 3-BrPA. Of note, the

lactate levels between the 3-BrPA treatment groups and the 3-BrPA+Dox treatment

groups showed no difference compared to the controls in the hypoxic environment. We

suggest that this reflects the overall baseline upregulation of lactate production of

neuroblastoma when exposed to a hypoxic environment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have found that in human neuroblastoma there is equal efficacy

of 3-BrPA against wild-type and Dox-resistant cell lines. Furthermore, we showed that 3-

BrPA seems to enhance the response of Dox-resistant neuroblastoma to treatment with

Dox and this enhancement exists in both normoxic conditions as well as hypoxic

conditions. Finally, our study suggests that this increased response of Dox-resistant cells

to treatment with Dox is mediated through decreased levels of glycolysis. Further work is

needed to more fully investigate the mechanism of action of 3-BrPA in the enhancement

Page 11: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

of chemotherapeutic susceptibility. This future work could prove to be the basis of a

unique mode of overcoming chemotherapy resistance in neuroblastoma.

References

1. Warburg O: On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956; 123:309-314.

2. Bustamante E, Pederson P. High aerobic glycolysis of rat hepatoma cells in culture:

Role of mitochondrial hexokinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977; 74: 3735-3739.

3. Wolf A, Agnihotri S, Micallef J, et al. Hexokinase 2 is a key mediator of aerobic

glycolysis and promotes tumor growth in human glioblastoma multiforme. J. Exp. Med.

2011; 208: 313-326.

4. Bhardway V, Rizvi N, Lai MB, Lai JC, Bhushan A: Glycolytic enzyme inhibitors

affect pancreatic cancer survival by modulating its signaling and energetics. Anticancer

Res 2010; 30:743-749.

5. Geschwind J, Ko Y, Torbenson M, et al. Novel therapy for liver cancer: direct

intraarterial injection of a potent inhibitor of ATP production. Cancer Res. 2002; 62:

3909-3913.

6. Levy AG, Zage PE, Akers LJ, et al: The combination of the novel glycolysis inhibitor

3-BrOP and rapamycin is effective against neuroblastoma. Invest New Drugs 2012;

30:191–199.

7. Liu XH, Zheng XF, Wang YL: Inhibitive effect of 3-bromopyruvic avid on human

breast cancer MCF-7 cells involves cell cycle arrest and apoptotic induction. Chin Med J

2009; 122:1681-1685.

8. Munoz-Pineda C, Ruiz-Ruiz C, de Almodovar C, et al. Inhibition of glucose

metabolism sensitizes tumor cells to death receptor-triggered apoptosis through

Page 12: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

enhancement of death-inducing signaling complex formation and apical Procaspase-8

processing. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 12759-12768.

9. Pereira da Silva AP, El-bacha T, Kyaw N, et al: Inhibition of energy producing

pathways of HepG2 cells by 3-bromopyruvate. Biochem J. 2009; 417: 717-726.

10. Xu RH, Pelicano H, Zhou Y, et al: Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: a novel

strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and

hypoxia. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 613-621.

11. Strandburg Ihrlund L, Hernlund E, Khan O, Shoshan MC. 3-bromopyruvate as

inhibitor of tumour cell energy metabolism and chemopotentiator of platinum drugs.

Molecular Oncology 2008; 2: 94-101.

12. Xu RH, Pelicano H, Zhang H, et al. Synergistic effect of targeting mTOR by

rapamycin and depleting ATP by inhibition of glycolysis in lymphoma and leukemia

cells. Leukemia 2005; 19: 2153-2158.

13. Endicott J, Ling V.The biochemistry of P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resistance.

Annual Rev Biochem 1989; 58: 137-171.

14. Shapiro A, Ling V. ATPase Activity of purified and reconstituted P-glycoprotein

from chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(5): 3745-3754.

15. Geschwind JF, Georgiades CS, Ko YH, Pedersen PL. Recently elucidated energy

catabolism pathways provide opportunities for novel treatment in hepatocellular

carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2004; 4: 449-57.

16. Ko YH, Pedersen P, Geschwind JF. Glucose catabolism in the rabbit VX2 tumor

model for liver cancer: characterization and targeting of hexokinase. Cancer Lett 2001;

173: 83-91.

Page 13: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure and Table Legends. (See attached files for the .jpeg images)

Figure 1. Cell viability at 24, 48, and 72 hours of incubation of SK-N-SH and SK-N-

Be(2)C Dox-resistant cells with 3-BrPA, Dox, or 3-BrPA+Dox compared to controls.

Table 1. Mean cell viabilities at 24, 48, and 72 hours for each experimental treatment

group as well as p-values.

Table 2. Relative ATP Levels

Figure 2. Intracellular lactate levels of SK-N-SH in normoxia and hypoxia.

Page 14: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 1

Page 15: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure 2

Page 16: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. IC50 values for SK-N-SH and SK-N-Be(2)C

SK-N-SH Wild-Type (95% CI) DoxR-6 (95% CI)

2.3x10-5M (1.9x10-5M to 3.0x10-5M) 3.1x10-5M (2.4x10-5M to 4.1x10-5M) SK-N-Be(2)C

Wild-Type (95% CI) DoxR-5 (95% CI) 4.6x10-6M (2.7x10-6M to 7.5x10-6M) 7.6x10-6M (3.9x10-6M to 1.5x10-5M)

Table 2. Percentage Mean cell viabilities at 24, 48, and 72 hours for each experimental treatment group as well as corresponding p-values

SK-N-SH DoxR-6 (Normoxia)

Control 3-BrPA Dox 3-

BrPA+Dox p-value (Dox vrs 3-

BrPA+Dox) 24

hours 87.03 ±

1.53 39.92 ±

2.57 41.23 ±

3.54 11.35 ±

1.69 p < 0.0001

48 hours

71.95 ± 2.47

34.03 ± 5.00

32.95 ± 2.86

4.42 ± 1.64 p < 0.0001

72 hours

83.42 ± 1.36

55.12 ± 2.46

45.20 ± 2.70

8.40 ± 1.40 p < 0.0001

SK-N-Be(2)C DoxR-5 (Normoxia)

Control 3-BrPA Dox 3-

BrPA+Dox p-value (Dox vrs 3-

BrPA+Dox) 24

hours 80.44 ±

3.45 37.10 ±

2.41 32.31 ±

5.15 7.61 ± 1.54 p = 0.0001

48 hours

70.37 ± 2.28

27.58 ± 2.53

31.88 ± 3.94

5.97 ± 1.13 p < 0.0001

72 hours

77.68 ± 1.75

32.06 ± 2.25

34.18 ± 4.69

3.11 ± 1.03 p < 0.0001

SK-N-SH DoxR-6 (Hypoxia)

Control 3-BrPA Dox 3-

BrPA+Dox p-value (Dox vrs 3-

BrPA+Dox) 24

hours 53.10 ±

3.35 22.38 ±

4.12 25.87 ±

4.86 10.83 ±

1.99 p = 0.0169

48 hours

22.00 ± 1.58

10.42 ± 0.76

13.62 ± 1.70

4.43 ± 1.21 p = 0.0013

72 hours

1.70 ± 0.85 - - - -

SK-N-Be(2)C DoxR-5 (Hypoxia)

Control 3-BrPA Dox 3-

BrPA+Dox p-value (Dox vrs 3-

BrPA+Dox) 24

hours 89.80 ±

3.46 35.05 ±

4.00 26.20 ±

2.64 6.38 ± 1.31 p < 0.0001

48 hours

67.67 ± 4.33

32.75 ± 3.11

20.33 ± 1.95

5.73 ± 1.43 p = 0.0001

72 69.27 ± 26.20 ± 17.58 ± 3.78 ± 1.11 p < 0.0001 hours 5.32 2.56 0.99

Page 17: Glycolysis inhibition and its effect in doxorubicin resistance in neuroblastoma

ACC

EPTE

D M

ANU

SCR

IPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AAP Discussion

Glycolysis inhibition and its Effect On Doxorubicin-Resistance in Neuroblastoma –

Jonathan Frederick Bean, MD, Chicago, IL

Discussant: DR. Cynthia DOWNARD, Louisville, KY

One quick question that I have is the 3-bromopyruvate is that a viable

in vivo model or will it kill the animals?

Response: DR. BEAN: Yes, it is. It actually has been used in

hepatocellular carcinoma, and actually in rat models, and they

are starting to use them in human studies now.

Discussant: DR. Jed Nuchtern. Houston, TX: I just wanted to

congratulate you on an excellent study. This very nice paper is

probably the beginning of some consensus that is arising in the

field of oncology about the central role that the mitochondria

may actually play in chemotherapy resistance. There was some

very nice work presented at the COG meeting recently showing that

if the mitochondria are changed in some way in a resistant tumor,

it doesn't matter what chemotherapy you give, it's not going to

work, so this I think is also a very interesting fact and

interesting study to bring to our attention that just shows that

as we go forward we really have to think about the mitochondria,

sort of a neglected organelle if you will.