19
ORIGINAL PAPER Globule-rich lavas in the Razjerd district, Qazvin, Iran: a unique volcanic fabric A. Asiabanha & J. M. Bardintzeff Received: 10 November 2012 / Accepted: 11 January 2013 # Saudi Society for Geosciences 2013 Abstract A hypocrystalline silica-rich (6367 wt.% SiO 2 , dacitic composition) lava flow (called G-lava) in the subaerial eruptive sequence of the Alborz Mountains (Razjerd district, Qazvin Province) of northern Iran, contains abundant (4050 vol.%) 0.1- to 5.0-cm globules set in a matrix of rather similar composition and microtexture. Numerous globules have coalesced, showing triple-point junctions with 120° angles. Both phases in the G-lava (globules and matrix) con- tain similar microphenocrysts (plagioclase, ortho- and clino- pyroxene and magnetite) in a trachytic groundmass. However, their mesostasis differ in colour, in composition, in the amount of glass and their amount of volatiles and silica: in the globules the mesostasis is darker and richer in SiO 2 but is volatile poor. Other volcanic materials in the same unit are very similar in composition to the G-lava. The globular fabric was formed with two phases: one poor in volatiles (the globules), the other rich in volatiles (the matrix). The globules are slightly more silicic (66.9 against 64.6 wt.% SiO 2 ), more potassic (3.7 againt 2.8 wt.% K 2 O) and more viscous (of the order of 10 3 to 10 4 ) than the matrix outside the globules. It seems that the two phases (globules and matrix) with different silica and volatiles contents and thus different vesicularities, viscosities and densities, were produced in the dacitic melt due to temperature and pressure drop and magmatic degassing in the volcanic conduit involved fluid-melt exsolution processes. Some of the volatile-rich melt was probably frothy during eruption, producing volcanic bombs and scoria. Keywords Globular texture . Fluid-meltexsolution . Dacite . Qazvin . Iran Introduction In the northern heights of Qazvin Province, situated on the western Alborz zone of North Iran, there is a narrow strip (about 5×15 km in area) of post-Eocene volcanic rocks in thrust-fault contact with Eocene volcanic rocks (Fig. 1). The Eocene volcanic succession in the area initiates with sub- aqueous volcano-sedimentary deposits and then subaerial mafic-felsic lava flows were produced with potassic calc- alkaline to shoshonitic affinities related to a continental collision regime (Asiabanha et al. 2009). The post-Eocene subaerial volcanic succession (200 m in thickness) shows three fresh and unaltered volcanic facies (Fig. 1) that are rhyolitic ignimbrite sheet, shoshonitic basaltic and trachy- basaltic lava flow, latitic and andesitic lava flow (Asiabanha et al. 2012). In the northwestern part of this post-Eocene strip (near Razjerd), the latitic-andesitic facies changes to a curious dacite, the topic of this paper, that shows a hetero- geneous fabric. Here, it exhibits two distinctive and easily separable phases: brown spherical masses (hereafter globules), 0.1 to 5 cm in size, in a pinkgrey matrix of a rather similar composition (Fig. 2a, b). This dacitic lava is herein referred to as a G-lava(G standing for globules). We observe great similarities (textural, mineralogical and even chemical) between the globules and the host. Because of these similarities, previous workers (e.g. Hosseini 1988) were not able to provide a satisfactory explanation for this unusual fabric. A. Asiabanha (*) Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran e-mail: [email protected] J. M. Bardintzeff IUFM, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, 95000 Cergy-Pontoise, France e-mail: [email protected] J. M. Bardintzeff Laboratoire de Pétrographie-Volcanologie and équipe Planétologie, UMR CNRS IDES 8148, Bât. 504, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cédex, France Arab J Geosci DOI 10.1007/s12517-013-0842-4

Globule-rich lavas in the Razjerd district, Qazvin, Iran: a ......Qazvin Province) of northern Iran, contains abundant (40– 50 vol.%) 0.1- to 5.0-cm globules set in a matrix of rather

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • ORIGINAL PAPER

    Globule-rich lavas in the Razjerd district, Qazvin, Iran:a unique volcanic fabric

    A. Asiabanha & J. M. Bardintzeff

    Received: 10 November 2012 /Accepted: 11 January 2013# Saudi Society for Geosciences 2013

    Abstract A hypocrystalline silica-rich (63–67 wt.% SiO2,dacitic composition) lava flow (called G-lava) in the subaerialeruptive sequence of the Alborz Mountains (Razjerd district,Qazvin Province) of northern Iran, contains abundant (40–50 vol.%) 0.1- to 5.0-cm globules set in a matrix of rathersimilar composition and microtexture. Numerous globuleshave coalesced, showing triple-point junctions with 120°angles. Both phases in the G-lava (globules and matrix) con-tain similar microphenocrysts (plagioclase, ortho- and clino-pyroxene and magnetite) in a trachytic groundmass. However,their mesostasis differ in colour, in composition, in the amountof glass and their amount of volatiles and silica: in the globulesthe mesostasis is darker and richer in SiO2 but is volatile poor.Other volcanic materials in the same unit are very similar incomposition to the G-lava. The globular fabric was formedwith two phases: one poor in volatiles (the globules), the otherrich in volatiles (the matrix). The globules are slightly moresilicic (66.9 against 64.6 wt.% SiO2), more potassic (3.7againt 2.8 wt.% K2O) and more viscous (of the order of 10

    3

    to 104) than the matrix outside the globules. It seems that thetwo phases (globules and matrix) with different silica andvolatiles contents and thus different vesicularities, viscositiesand densities, were produced in the dacitic melt due to

    temperature and pressure drop and magmatic degassing inthe volcanic conduit involved fluid-melt exsolution processes.Some of the volatile-rich melt was probably frothy duringeruption, producing volcanic bombs and scoria.

    Keywords Globular texture . Fluid-meltexsolution .Dacite .

    Qazvin . Iran

    Introduction

    In the northern heights of Qazvin Province, situated on thewestern Alborz zone of North Iran, there is a narrow strip(about 5×15 km in area) of post-Eocene volcanic rocks inthrust-fault contact with Eocene volcanic rocks (Fig. 1). TheEocene volcanic succession in the area initiates with sub-aqueous volcano-sedimentary deposits and then subaerialmafic-felsic lava flows were produced with potassic calc-alkaline to shoshonitic affinities related to a continentalcollision regime (Asiabanha et al. 2009). The post-Eocenesubaerial volcanic succession (∼200 m in thickness) showsthree fresh and unaltered volcanic facies (Fig. 1) that arerhyolitic ignimbrite sheet, shoshonitic basaltic and trachy-basaltic lava flow, latitic and andesitic lava flow (Asiabanhaet al. 2012). In the northwestern part of this post-Eocenestrip (near Razjerd), the latitic-andesitic facies changes to acurious dacite, the topic of this paper, that shows a hetero-geneous fabric. Here, it exhibits two distinctive and easilyseparable phases: brown spherical masses (hereafter“globules”), 0.1 to 5 cm in size, in a pink–grey matrix of arather similar composition (Fig. 2a, b). This dacitic lava isherein referred to as a “G-lava” (G standing for globules).

    We observe great similarities (textural, mineralogical andeven chemical) between the globules and the host. Becauseof these similarities, previous workers (e.g. Hosseini 1988)were not able to provide a satisfactory explanation for thisunusual fabric.

    A. Asiabanha (*)Department of Geology, Faculty of Science,Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Irane-mail: [email protected]

    J. M. BardintzeffIUFM, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, 95000 Cergy-Pontoise,Francee-mail: [email protected]

    J. M. BardintzeffLaboratoire de Pétrographie-Volcanologie and équipePlanétologie, UMR CNRS IDES 8148, Bât. 504,Université Paris-Sud,91405 Orsay Cédex, France

    Arab J GeosciDOI 10.1007/s12517-013-0842-4

  • An apparent lack of similar cases in other parts of theworld is just one reason for uncertainties in explaining thephenomenon. In this paper, we describe an example of thisglobular texture from Iran, discuss different hypotheses forgenesis and propose the tentative explanations of its originbased on field, petrographic and chemical data.

    Geological setting

    Geologically, the study area is part of the post-Eocenevolcanic succession in the Alborz magmatic assemblage ofnorthern Iran. According to Asiabanha et al. (2012), thesuccession was produced by subaerial explosive eruptionsfollowed by effusive eruptions. (1) The rhyolitic ignimbriticsheet underlain by a thicker lithic breccia is the product ofthe gas-rich explosive eruptions. (2) Lava flows, including

    shoshonitic basalt and trachybasalt, latite and andesite, over-lie the first event products across a reddish soil horizon.

    Asiabanha et al. (2012) concluded using mineral chemistrydata and petrographic evidence that the magma chamber hadbeen evolved by differentiation, magma mixing and vesicula-tion. Andesites of this succession are the main products ofsuch chemical disequilibrium.

    The exceptional globule-bearing outcrop (G-lava), themain subject of this paper, of dacitic composition, is seenin the same level as those containing the andesitic lava flowsin the neighbouring district (Abazar).

    Field relations and volcanic fabrics

    Two dominant volcanic units are seen in the Razjerd area:(1) A brown pyroxene-phyric shoshonitic basalt composed

    Fig. 1 Geological map of theRazjerd district, Iran

    Fig. 2 Field photographs ofglobule-rich lava in the Razjerddistrict. a A hand specimen of aglobule-rich lava; b outcrop ofthe same lava; c coalescence ofglobules in the direction offlow; and d two ellipsoidal-shaped volcanic bombs in theG-lava unit

    Arab J Geosci

  • of phenocrysts of zoned plagioclase (An33–74), zoned ensta-tite, augite, olivine (partially weathered into iddingsite) andFe–Ti oxides (total phenocrysts, >50 vol.%) in a trachytic ormicrolitic matrix containing the same minerals together withscarce microlites of sanidine and a hyaline mesostasis. (2)Shoshonitic basalt is overlain by a thick (about 100 m)grey–black unit of dacite lava that contains lenses of scori-aceous material (Fig. 3). Although the same unit, mainlyandesitic, is found throughout the area, it has a unique fabricand chemical composition (dacitic) only in the Razjerddistrict. In Razjerd, the lava contains 0.1–5.0 cm sphericalglobules (40–50 vol.%) embedded in a matrix with nearlythe same composition and texture, and with little apparentdifference between globules and matrix (Fig. 2a, b). Most ofthe globules have coalesced together in the direction of flow(Fig. 2c). In the same area, abundant ellipsoidal-shapedvolcanic bombs (up to 50 cm long) are also found(Fig. 2d) that are chemically more similar to the matrix ofthe G-lava rather than globular masses (see below).

    Analytical methods

    Many samples were prepared for microprobe analyses, espe-cially from the G-lava, because an initial analysis of handspecimens suggested that the two distinctive phases (globulesand matrix) may contain different minerals. The minerals and

    mesostases in the volcanic rocks were assessed and analysedusing a CAMECA SX 100 (15 kV, 10 nA) electron microprobeat the Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, France(Tables 1, 2, and 3). Kα lines were used. The analysed stan-dards were diopside for Si, Ca and Mg; Fe2O3 for Fe; MnTiO3for Ti andMn; Cr2O3 for Cr; albite for Na; and orthoclase for Kand Al. Counting times were 10 s for both peaks and back-ground, with a 5-μm defocused beam.

    SEM (Philips XL 30) analyses (60 s counting time, 1 nA,water-free analyses, recalculated to 100) and back scatteredelectron microphotographs were made at the UniversitéParis-Sud Orsay, CNRS-IDES, France (Table 4).

    Reflection infrared (IR) spectrometry analyses were per-formed with a Bruker Vector 22 FTIR spectrophotometerattached to a Bruker Hyperion 2000 IR microscope with a×15 Cassegrain objective, numerical aperture of 32, at theCentre de Spectroscopie Infrarouge of the Muséum Nationald’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France. The IR spectra wereobtained in reflection mode on polished thin sections.

    For whole-rock geochemical analysis, samples were se-lected from G-lava, scoria and volcanic bombs and wereanalysed using inductively coupled plasma (ICP)–massspectrometry at the Actlab Laboratory, Canada (Table 5).Samples were crushed and pulverised in an agate mill, andanalysed using the lithium metaborate/tetraborate fusionICP Whole-Rock Package. A portion of sample pulp wasmixed with flux (lithium metaborate, LiBO2) to lower themelting point. The mixture was then heated in a mufflefurnace until molten. After cooling, the fused mass wasdigested in 5 % HNO3, and the resulting clear solutionwas analysed.

    Petrography and mineral chemistry

    The main lava flows of the study area are described heretexturally and mineralogically.

    Globule-bearing hypocrystalline lava

    As noted earlier, a level of andesitic composition is foundthroughout the wider region, but it is only in the study areaaround Razjerd that the lava has a dacitic composition andcontains abundant (40–50 vol.% and locally up to 60 vol.%)spherical globules. Despite the apparent distinctive differ-ences between globules and matrix in outcrops and handspecimens, their petrographic characteristics, including tex-ture and mineral assemblage, crystal size and crystal amountare very similar. The only difference is in the colour of theglass (Fig. 4). Indeed, we observed that the micropheno-crysts of plagioclase (An25–67), enstatite, diopsidic augite(Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 5) and magnetite, set in a trachytichypocrystalline matrix, are seen in both phases (globules

    Fig. 3 Scoriaceous inliers (about 30 cm thick) in the globule-rich lavathat is bordered by white lines

    Arab J Geosci

  • Tab

    le1

    Chemical

    compo

    sitio

    nsof

    selected

    mineralsfrom

    glob

    ules

    ofG-lava

    Label

    8687

    9091

    103

    104

    106

    109

    158

    137a

    102

    108

    7071

    7274

    9596

    97Cpx

    -cCpx

    -mCpx

    -cCpx

    -rOpx

    -cOpx

    -rOpx

    Opx

    Opx

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag-c

    Plag-m

    Plag-r

    Plag

    Plag-c

    Plag-r

    Plag

    Mineral

    SiO

    251

    .09

    52.38

    51.79

    52.44

    53.95

    53.61

    54.37

    52.33

    54.40

    68.21

    54.49

    53.20

    55.23

    53.06

    55.37

    57.24

    53.60

    65.46

    61.20

    TiO

    20.52

    0.45

    0.33

    0.38

    0.25

    0.24

    0.18

    0.30

    0.23

    0.16

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.15

    0.00

    Al 2O3

    2.36

    2.45

    1.53

    1.92

    1.19

    1.43

    1.28

    1.66

    0.90

    18.83

    27.50

    29.43

    27.99

    29.42

    27.84

    26.24

    28.60

    19.78

    22.78

    Cr 2O3

    0.08

    0.05

    0.02

    0.00

    0.06

    0.02

    0.00

    0.06

    0.03

    0.01

    0.04

    0.05

    0.03

    0.01

    0.00

    0.05

    0.00

    0.02

    0.00

    Fe 2O3

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.61

    1.04

    0.70

    0.97

    0.73

    0.73

    0.90

    0.85

    0.74

    1.00

    FeO

    8.51

    8.84

    8.23

    8.30

    16.40

    16.21

    16.95

    18.61

    16.53

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    MnO

    0.41

    0.44

    0.45

    0.44

    0.71

    0.63

    0.75

    0.68

    0.63

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.05

    0.01

    0.00

    0.04

    0.03

    0.01

    0.00

    MgO

    14.80

    14.06

    15.58

    15.66

    24.70

    24.97

    24.56

    23.63

    24.81

    0.02

    0.07

    0.07

    0.10

    0.05

    0.05

    0.05

    0.06

    0.03

    0.05

    CaO

    20.74

    20.69

    20.52

    20.16

    1.43

    1.47

    1.38

    1.70

    1.41

    3.14

    10.40

    12.38

    10.59

    12.00

    10.78

    9.08

    11.38

    4.40

    6.48

    Na 2O

    0.26

    0.36

    0.28

    0.31

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.04

    0.01

    6.04

    5.29

    4.47

    5.63

    4.64

    5.42

    6.29

    4.98

    5.96

    5.94

    K2O

    0.02

    0.05

    0.01

    0.00

    0.02

    0.01

    0.00

    0.02

    0.01

    2.95

    0.48

    0.28

    0.38

    0.37

    0.46

    0.66

    0.39

    2.07

    1.89

    P2O5

    0.02

    0.01

    0.02

    0.04

    0.01

    0.04

    0.03

    0.01

    0.01

    0.05

    0.03

    0.04

    0.03

    0.03

    0.01

    0.04

    0.04

    0.00

    0.06

    NiO

    0.04

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.04

    0.03

    0.00

    0.00

    0.04

    0.06

    0.04

    0.02

    0.00

    0.02

    0.05

    0.02

    SrO

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.08

    0.00

    0.00

    0.07

    0.00

    0.10

    0.00

    0.00

    BaO

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.06

    0.39

    0.00

    0.07

    0.04

    0.00

    0.00

    0.09

    0.00

    0.00

    0.11

    Cl

    0.00

    0.02

    0.00

    0.01

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.00

    0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.01

    F0.10

    0.04

    0.21

    0.00

    0.20

    0.06

    0.02

    0.00

    0.23

    0.00

    0.07

    0.00

    0.13

    0.11

    0.00

    0.03

    0.00

    0.04

    0.13

    Total

    98.89

    99.83

    98.87

    99.66

    98.84

    98.67

    99.53

    99.10

    99.19

    100.42

    99.37

    100.84

    101.16

    100.44

    100.76

    100.70

    100.07

    98.70

    99.60

    Si

    1.91

    1.95

    1.93

    1.94

    1.98

    1.97

    1.99

    1.94

    1.99

    3.00

    2.48

    2.40

    2.48

    2.40

    2.49

    2.57

    2.43

    2.93

    2.75

    Ti

    0.02

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    Al

    0.10

    0.11

    0.07

    0.08

    0.05

    0.06

    0.06

    0.07

    0.04

    0.98

    1.48

    1.56

    1.48

    1.57

    1.47

    1.39

    1.53

    1.04

    1.21

    Cr

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Fe3

    +0.08

    0.01

    0.13

    0.03

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.04

    0.02

    0.02

    0.04

    0.02

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    Fe2

    +0.18

    0.27

    0.13

    0.23

    0.48

    0.50

    0.52

    0.54

    0.49

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Mn

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Mg

    0.83

    0.78

    0.86

    0.87

    1.35

    1.37

    1.34

    1.31

    1.35

    0.00

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ca

    0.83

    0.83

    0.82

    0.80

    0.06

    0.06

    0.05

    0.07

    0.06

    0.15

    0.51

    0.60

    0.51

    0.58

    0.52

    0.44

    0.55

    0.21

    0.31

    Na

    0.02

    0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.51

    0.47

    0.39

    0.49

    0.41

    0.47

    0.55

    0.44

    0.52

    0.52

    K0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.17

    0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.02

    0.12

    0.11

    P0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ni

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Sr

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ba

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Cl

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Arab J Geosci

  • and matrix) (Fig. 4a, b). In the matrix, the finer microlites ofplagioclase and thin rims around the larger micropheno-crysts are richer in potassium (up to Or20). Interestingly,across the borders between globules and matrix, the flowdirection indicated by the microlites continues unchanged(Fig. 4a, b). In some cases, the same crystal is situatedexactly between globule and matrix that is to say with onepart in a globule and the other part in the matrix. Moreover,numerous globules have coalesced, and are even embeddedtogether (Fig. 2c). Sometimes, triple point junctions withangles of 120° are displayed (Fig. 4c). Of note, all theminerals and even the mesostasis are fresh and unaltered.Furthermore, vesicles and cavities are not occupied by sec-ondary materials. A few inliers of scoriaceous material, as acontinuous unit, with similar mineralogical and chemicalcompositions to the host, are seen in the G-lava (Fig. 3).

    Scoria

    The occurrence of scoria lenses in the G-lava unit (Fig. 3) isinterpreted to be related to an increase in volatile contents inthe chamber at a near surface level, and the consequentformation of foam-rich horizons in the melt. The petro-graphic considerations show that the vesicles in the scoriahave not been occupied by secondary minerals (Fig. 4d).

    Groundmass in G-lava

    The less content of glass in the globule with respect to thematrix in G-lava is worth noting. The colour of the meso-stasis (as reflected in the refractive indices) is darker in theglobule (Fig. 4a, b) than in the matrix. To elucidate thesituation in the G-lava, the mesostasis of both the globulesand matrix were analysed using a microprobe (Table 3) anda SEM (Table 4, Fig. 6).

    Glass of the matrix, analysed with a microprobe (Table 3),contain 73–74 wt.% SiO2, that correspond to 37–38 wt.% ofnormative quartz and 11–12 wt.% Al2O3. Totals are about94–95 wt.% that witness of 5–6 wt.% of fluids, as thedifference between the analytical total and 100 is consideredto represent volatiles, especially water (Anderson 1979).Glasses analysed in bombs are nearly the same. It wasimpossible to analyse globule groundmass with the micro-probe as the size of the phases are too small (less than5 μm).

    SEM observations have been made (Fig. 6; Table 4).Globules are Si and K richer than the matrix.

    The matrix contains glass phases 10–20-μm wide (77–79 wt.% SiO2 and 14–15 wt.% Al2O3 when recalculated to100). These analyses are consistent with those obtained withmicroprobe presented in Table 3.

    The groundmass phases in the globules have small sizes(less than 5-μm wide) and are in small amount. They areTa

    ble

    1(con

    tinued)

    Label

    8687

    9091

    103

    104

    106

    109

    158

    137a

    102

    108

    7071

    7274

    9596

    97Cpx

    -cCpx

    -mCpx

    -cCpx

    -rOpx

    -cOpx

    -rOpx

    Opx

    Opx

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag-c

    Plag-m

    Plag-r

    Plag

    Plag-c

    Plag-r

    Plag

    F0.01

    0.01

    0.03

    0.00

    0.02

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.03

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.02

    Sum

    3.99

    4.01

    4.01

    3.99

    3.99

    4.00

    3.99

    4.00

    4.01

    4.85

    5.03

    5.00

    5.04

    5.03

    5.01

    5.02

    5.00

    4.87

    4.95

    AlIV

    0.09

    0.05

    0.07

    0.06

    0.02

    0.03

    0.01

    0.06

    0.01

    AlV

    I0.01

    0.06

    0.00

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.04

    0.01

    0.03

    Wollaston

    ite45

    .19

    44.05

    45.24

    42.20

    2.96

    3.01

    2.83

    3.50

    2.90

    Enstatite

    44.86

    41.64

    47.79

    45.63

    71.50

    71.08

    70.05

    68.20

    71.44

    Ferrosilite

    9.95

    14.31

    6.97

    12.17

    25.54

    25.91

    27.12

    28.30

    25.66

    Ortho

    clase

    19.95

    2.79

    1.59

    2.15

    2.18

    2.56

    3.72

    2.27

    13.96

    11.51

    Albite

    62.15

    46.56

    38.91

    47.99

    40.26

    46.41

    53.57

    43.25

    61.07

    55.22

    Ano

    rthite

    17.90

    50.65

    59.50

    49.85

    57.57

    51.03

    42.70

    54.48

    24.97

    33.26

    Calculatio

    nsarebasedon

    four

    catio

    nsforpy

    roxenesandeigh

    tox

    ygensforplagioclases

    ccore,m

    middle,rrim,Plagplagioclase,Cpx

    clinop

    yrox

    ene,Opx

    orthop

    yrox

    ene

    aSam

    ple13

    7=microliteless

    than

    15μm

    long

    Arab J Geosci

  • Tab

    le2

    Chemical

    compo

    sitio

    nsof

    selected

    mineralsfrom

    thematrixof

    G-lava

    Label

    114

    117

    118

    121

    160

    162

    151

    124

    125

    126

    128

    140a

    143a

    144a

    145a

    148

    150a

    155a

    Opx

    Opx

    -cOpx

    -rOpx

    Opx

    -cOpx

    -rCpx

    Plag-c

    Plag-r

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Mineral

    SiO

    253

    .83

    54.37

    54.41

    54.42

    54.45

    53.87

    50.74

    53.56

    53.96

    64.31

    53.47

    54.63

    64.09

    57.60

    68.97

    51.81

    56.71

    59.03

    TiO

    20.08

    0.20

    0.12

    0.18

    0.19

    0.12

    0.37

    0.00

    0.04

    0.20

    0.04

    0.00

    0.09

    0.10

    0.27

    0.00

    0.03

    0.00

    Al 2O3

    0.72

    0.71

    0.70

    1.54

    0.62

    1.13

    1.99

    28.71

    28.79

    21.03

    28.80

    28.71

    20.44

    24.72

    16.78

    29.51

    26.20

    24.30

    Cr 2O3

    0.01

    0.00

    0.04

    0.04

    0.06

    0.05

    0.06

    0.00

    0.00

    0.03

    0.05

    0.02

    0.02

    0.05

    0.03

    0.00

    0.00

    0.03

    Fe 2O3

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.82

    0.70

    0.87

    0.84

    0.90

    0.82

    0.89

    1.15

    0.86

    0.69

    0.77

    FeO

    16.49

    16.27

    15.98

    16.20

    16.46

    16.06

    8.43

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    MnO

    0.62

    0.62

    0.62

    0.61

    0.67

    0.77

    0.29

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.05

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    MgO

    25.56

    25.54

    25.46

    24.23

    25.55

    25.05

    15.08

    0.07

    0.06

    0.03

    0.09

    0.05

    0.01

    0.06

    0.07

    0.06

    0.02

    0.04

    CaO

    1.40

    1.47

    1.53

    1.73

    1.50

    1.46

    20.02

    11.51

    11.65

    6.79

    11.62

    10.85

    4.26

    7.19

    2.36

    12.41

    8.61

    7.62

    Na 2O

    0.00

    0.06

    0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.03

    0.31

    4.81

    4.81

    4.38

    4.69

    4.73

    6.43

    6.84

    5.81

    4.01

    6.38

    6.28

    K2O

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.33

    0.33

    1.94

    0.27

    0.44

    1.94

    0.73

    2.61

    0.32

    0.57

    1.15

    P2O5

    0.01

    0.02

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.08

    0.03

    0.02

    0.07

    0.02

    0.07

    0.04

    0.07

    0.06

    NiO

    0.02

    0.05

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.07

    0.00

    0.02

    0.02

    0.00

    0.05

    0.02

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.05

    0.00

    SrO

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.07

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    BaO

    0.00

    0.18

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.03

    0.08

    0.23

    0.10

    0.05

    0.30

    0.04

    0.10

    0.00

    0.14

    0.24

    Cl

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.00

    0.03

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    F0.11

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.11

    0.00

    0.27

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.03

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.15

    0.11

    Total

    98.81

    99.47

    98.89

    98.98

    99.52

    98.67

    97.31

    100.12

    100.45

    99.87

    100.06

    100.46

    98.54

    98.24

    98.25

    99.02

    99.58

    99.60

    Si

    1.98

    1.99

    1.99

    1.99

    1.99

    1.98

    1.93

    2.43

    2.44

    2.86

    2.43

    2.46

    2.88

    2.63

    3.07

    2.38

    2.57

    2.67

    Ti

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.01

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Al

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.07

    0.03

    0.05

    0.09

    1.54

    1.53

    1.10

    1.54

    1.52

    1.08

    1.33

    0.88

    1.60

    1.40

    1.29

    Cr

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Fe3

    +0.04

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.05

    0.03

    0.02

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.03

    0.04

    0.03

    0.02

    0.03

    Fe2

    +0.47

    0.50

    0.49

    0.50

    0.50

    0.49

    0.21

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Mn

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.02

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Mg

    1.40

    1.39

    1.39

    1.32

    1.39

    1.37

    0.85

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ca

    0.06

    0.06

    0.06

    0.07

    0.06

    0.06

    0.82

    0.56

    0.56

    0.32

    0.57

    0.52

    0.21

    0.35

    0.11

    0.61

    0.42

    0.37

    Na

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.42

    0.42

    0.38

    0.41

    0.41

    0.56

    0.61

    0.50

    0.36

    0.56

    0.55

    K0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.02

    0.11

    0.02

    0.03

    0.11

    0.04

    0.15

    0.02

    0.03

    0.07

    P0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ni

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Sr

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Ba

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Cl

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    Arab J Geosci

  • silica rich (93.5–97 wt.% SiO2 and 2–4 wt.% Al2O3 insample R1b; 88–91 wt.% SiO2 and 6–7 wt.% Al2O3 insample R2b).

    A border of quenched glass (5–15 μm wide) separatesglobules from their matrix. In detail, it presents a heteroge-neous chemical composition from core to rim: 69 to 59 wt.%SiO2, 19 to 7 wt.% Al2O3 and 7 to 26 wt.% FeO (Table 4).These values are in the range of those of the whole rock G-lava analyses, except for iron. Note that the border ofquenched glass is wider (15 μm) in sample R1b that containlarger (3–5 mm wide) globules, than in sample R2b (4–10 μm) that contain smaller globules (1 mm wide). Notethat some crystals are situated in part in globule and in partin matrix, cross the border.

    No vesicles are observed inside globules and matrix butvesicles (10–100 μm) appeared in the matrix close to theglobules and all around them (Fig. 6). Note that thesevesicles are not spherical, that could be explained by thedeformation of the whole molten rock by fluidality, asevidenced by microliths orientation.

    Samples were analysed by reflection IR spectrometry(Fig. 7). Glass of matrix spectra presents two bands at1,092 and 785 cm−1. This is typical of volcanic glass andlooks like obsidian (Lipari, Italy) spectrum with a band at1,085 cm−1.

    Quenched border spectrum seems typical of a glass dueto two reflection bands at 1,046 and 793 cm−1 and moreovera phonon mode at 1,110 cm−1. This asymetric band shape isknown from amorphous and vitreous siliceous phases.

    For globule, analyses are more difficult because of thevery small size of the groundmass phases (less than 5 μm).So, obtained analyses (spot size=40×40 μm) mainlycorrespond to mixing between several phases. We observetwo large bands: one around 1,000 cm−1 that could correspondto microliths, the other around 1,120 cm−1 that couldcorrespond to the silica phase analysed with SEM. Thissecond band is concordant with silica phase as crystoballite,tridymite and lechatelierite.

    Whole-rock chemistry

    Major element chemistry

    Figure 8 shows the chemical compositions of the samples onthe TAS diagram of Le Maitre et al. (2002). Some importantobservations are as follows:

    1. Although the chemical composition of the andesitic unitin the adjacent area (i.e. Abazar district) falls in theandesitic field (Fig. 8), the G-lava from the study area(Razjerd district) occupies the dacite field. Note, how-ever, that the modal compositions of the samplesTa

    ble

    2(con

    tinued)

    Label

    114

    117

    118

    121

    160

    162

    151

    124

    125

    126

    128

    140a

    143a

    144a

    145a

    148

    150a

    155a

    Opx

    Opx

    -cOpx

    -rOpx

    Opx

    -cOpx

    -rCpx

    Plag-c

    Plag-r

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    Plag

    F0.01

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.01

    0.00

    0.04

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.02

    0.02

    Sum

    4.01

    4.00

    3.98

    3.98

    4.00

    3.99

    3.99

    5.05

    4.99

    4.81

    5.01

    4.97

    4.88

    4.99

    4.77

    5.00

    5.02

    5.00

    AlIV

    0.03

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.01

    0.02

    0.07

    AlV

    I0.01

    0.02

    0.02

    0.06

    0.01

    0.03

    0.02

    Wollaston

    ite2.87

    2.93

    3.09

    3.61

    3.02

    2.97

    43.28

    Enstatite

    72.87

    71.52

    71.65

    70.10

    71.25

    71.66

    45.35

    Ferrosilite

    24.26

    25.55

    25.26

    26.30

    25.73

    25.37

    11.36

    Ortho

    clase

    1.89

    1.89

    13.58

    1.61

    2.60

    12.66

    4.30

    19.50

    1.83

    3.26

    6.70

    Albite

    42.27

    41.93

    46.54

    41.49

    42.98

    63.97

    60.54

    65.71

    36.18

    55.39

    55.84

    Ano

    rthite

    55.83

    56.18

    39.88

    56.90

    54.42

    23.38

    35.16

    14.79

    61.99

    41.35

    37.46

    Calculatio

    nsarebasedon

    four

    catio

    nsforpy

    roxenesandeigh

    tox

    ygen

    forplagioclases

    ccore,rrim,Plagplagioclase,Opx

    orthop

    yrox

    ene

    aSam

    ples

    140,

    143,

    144,

    145,

    150and15

    5=microlites

    less

    than

    30μm

    long

    Arab J Geosci

  • (plag≈25 vol.%, px≈3 vol.% and opaque of ≤2 vol.%)are not so different than those of an andesite. It seemsthat such a compositional shift is caused by magmadifferentiation near the surface.

    2. In the G-lava, globules contain more SiO2 and K2O(that confirm SEM analyses), and a lower LOI thanthe matrix (Table 5, samples G1 and GF1). This resultis confirmed by the occurrence of silica phase inglobules observed with SEM.

    3. The chemical compositions of other volcanic productsfrom the study area (including volcanic bombs and

    scoria) do not differ from the G-lavas (Table 5;Fig. 8). The high values for LOI in the scoria(4.30 wt.% in sample R8; Table 5) confirm the highvolatile contents of the scoria, that witness of foam-richhorizons.

    Trace element chemistry

    Table 5 shows the abundance of trace elements in differentvolcanic products from the study area. These data are plot-ted as spider diagrams (Fig. 9) that enable comparisons of

    Table 3 Chemical microprobe analyses and CIPW normative compositions of mesostasis in matrix of G-lavas and in bombs

    Label 123 141 142 147 204 206Matrix Bombs

    SiO2 74.18 73.60 73.26 72.97 71.10 66.39

    TiO2 0.50 0.47 0.52 0.35 0.33 0.19

    Al2O3 12.05 11.23 11.94 11.32 14.29 16.81

    Cr2O3 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.01

    FeO 0.63 0.81 0.62 0.93 0.94 1.17

    MnO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01

    MgO 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.07 0.11

    CaO 0.30 0.17 0.71 0.56 1.72 3.15

    Na2O 2.96 2.91 3.33 2.47 3.97 4.98

    K2O 4.75 5.09 4.07 5.00 3.74 2.81

    P2O5 0.09 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.08 0.12

    NiO 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.04 0.06

    SrO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    BaO 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.06 0.15

    Cl 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.04

    F 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.27 0.00

    Total 95.66 94.56 94.82 93.91 96.66 95.88

    CIPW norm

    Quartz 38.40 37.06 36.92 38.19 30.18 20.07

    Corundum 1.71 0.79 0.84 0.92 0.78 0.14

    Orthoclase 28.04 30.05 24.03 29.51 22.08 16.59

    Albite 25.02 24.60 28.15 20.88 33.56 42.10

    Anorthite 0.91 0.39 3.33 2.52 8.01 14.84

    Diopside

    Hypersthene 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.40 0.17 0.41

    Magnetite 0.19 0.32 0.93

    Ilmenite 0.52 0.69 0.52 0.67 0.63 0.36

    Hematite 0.38 0.49 0.37 0.43 0.33

    Apatite 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.09 0.17 0.26

    Densitya (kg/m3) 2,092 2,043 2,057 2,032 2,157 2,166

    Viscositya (Pa.s) 1.77E+04 1.15E+04 1.22E+04 9.32E+03 1.85E+04 1.02E+04

    Viscosityb (Pa.s) 4.78E+03 9.69E+02 1.32E+03 5.52E+02 9.89E+03 2.73E+03

    Density calculated according to Bottinga and Weil (1972); and viscosity calculated according to Bottinga and Weil (1972) and Shaw (1972)a Bottinga and Weil (1972)b Shaw (1972)

    Arab J Geosci

  • Tab

    le4

    SEM

    glassanalyses

    (recalculatedto

    100)

    Sam

    ple

    R1b

    R1b

    R1b

    R2b

    R2b

    R1b

    R1b

    R2b

    R1b

    R1b

    R1b

    R1b

    Globu

    leMatrix

    Border

    Point

    No.

    A6

    A7

    A11

    B40

    B41

    A13

    A16

    B39

    A18

    A32

    A33

    A34

    Precise

    Scan3×3μm

    Scan5×5μm

    Core

    Rim

    SiO

    293

    .59

    95.19

    97.01

    88.46

    90.72

    78.12

    77.35

    78.95

    67.27

    59.09

    68.52

    61.35

    TiO

    20.27

    0.22

    0.11

    0.12

    0.00

    0.63

    0.30

    0.53

    0.75

    0.18

    0.81

    0.20

    Al 2O3

    4.25

    3.30

    2.00

    7.40

    6.21

    14.85

    14.07

    14.01

    18.72

    7.55

    14.67

    9.02

    FeO

    0.27

    0.18

    0.33

    0.36

    0.33

    0.79

    0.82

    0.58

    7.08

    26.12

    9.65

    22.96

    MnO

    0.00

    0.18

    0.00

    0.00

    0.00

    0.11

    0.00

    0.00

    0.21

    0.43

    0.23

    0.00

    MgO

    0.07

    0.11

    0.15

    0.05

    0.05

    0.07

    0.11

    0.05

    2.77

    2.24

    2.93

    2.55

    CaO

    0.13

    0.13

    0.02

    0.31

    0.33

    0.22

    0.25

    0.17

    0.75

    0.86

    0.90

    0.96

    Na 2O

    0.33

    0.40

    0.20

    0.62

    0.64

    1.48

    2.14

    1.30

    0.24

    0.33

    0.20

    0.48

    K2O

    1.09

    0.29

    0.18

    2.68

    1.72

    3.73

    4.96

    4.41

    2.21

    3.20

    2.09

    2.48

    Total

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    100.00

    CIPW

    norm

    Quartz

    87.19

    91.25

    94.97

    73.93

    79.71

    54.72

    45.28

    54.13

    50.91

    33.20

    52.00

    38.37

    Corun

    dum

    2.29

    2.09

    1.44

    2.92

    2.70

    7.98

    4.73

    6.79

    14.58

    1.98

    10.45

    3.80

    Ortho

    clase

    6.43

    1.71

    1.06

    15.82

    10.15

    22.02

    29.28

    26.03

    13.05

    18.89

    12.34

    14.64

    Albite

    2.79

    3.38

    1.69

    5.24

    5.41

    12.51

    18.09

    10.99

    2.03

    2.79

    1.69

    4.06

    Ano

    rthite

    0.64

    0.64

    0.10

    1.54

    1.64

    1.09

    1.24

    0.84

    3.72

    4.26

    4.46

    4.76

    Hyp

    ersthene

    0.17

    0.58

    0.37

    0.12

    0.12

    0.17

    0.27

    0.12

    8.67

    20.02

    9.72

    17.05

    Magnetite

    0.28

    0.11

    5.65

    18.56

    7.84

    16.98

    Hem

    atite

    0.21

    0.26

    0.26

    0.05

    0.51

    0.44

    0.37

    Ilmenite

    0.14

    0.42

    0.15

    0.21

    0.84

    0.57

    0.44

    1.43

    0.34

    1.54

    0.38

    Density

    a(K

    g/m

    3)

    2,27

    12,27

    62,26

    32,28

    42,27

    82,32

    52,31

    92,31

    32,53

    42,89

    32,56

    928

    00

    Viscosity

    a(Pa.s)

    1.84

    E+11

    3.36

    E+11

    4.35

    E+11

    1.75

    E+10

    5.32

    E+10

    5.51

    E+08

    1.72

    E+08

    6.92

    E+08

    2.04

    E+06

    2.24

    E+03

    8.47

    E+05

    7.05

    E+03

    Viscosity

    b(Pa.s)

    1.29

    E+06

    1.55

    E+06

    1.75

    E+06

    8.35

    E+05

    1.08

    E+06

    3.73

    E+05

    4.56

    E+05

    3.77

    E+05

    3.72

    E+04

    5.01

    E+03

    7.11E+04

    8.99

    E+03

    aBottin

    gaandWeil(197

    2)bShaw

    (197

    2)

    Arab J Geosci

  • Table 5 Chemical whole-rock analyses and CIPW normative compositions of volcanic rocks from the Razjerd area, Qazvin, Iran

    Sample No. G1 GF1 R1 R2 R5 R8 R13Globule Matrix (outside the globule) G-Lava Bomb Scoria Shoshonitic Basalt

    SiO2 66.90 64.60 64.80 65.40 65.40 63.00 45.20

    TiO2 0.39 0.40 0.38 0.39 0.38 0.39 1.66

    Al2O3 15.80 15.45 15.55 15.80 15.50 15.85 17.15

    Cr2O3

  • the trace element patterns for globules and matrix from the G-lava (Fig. 9c, f), G-lava and shoshonitic basalt (Fig. 9a, d),scoria, volcanic bomb and G-lava (Fig. 9b, e).

    As shown in these plots, there are similarities in the trace-element patterns for materials from the G-lavas (globules,matrix, bombs, scoria and globule-free lava), including en-richment in LREEs compared with HREEs (by a factor ofabout 10), negative anomalies of Eu, Ba, Ta and Ti andpositive anomalies of Th and Ce.

    The spider diagram pattern for shoshonitic basalt differsfrom the patterns for the G-lava and related rocks (globules,scoria and bombs). As shown in Fig. 9d, the G-lava showsmore depletion in MREEs than the shoshonitic basalt.

    Physical parameters

    Different physical parameters (temperature, pressure andvolatile content) could significantly modify density andviscosity of a melt (e.g. Bardintzeff 1992; Wohletz 1999).In that way, Kushiro et al. (1976) have shown that an

    addition of 4 wt.% of fluids in an andesitic melt wouldreduced its viscosity by a factor of 20.

    The tentative calculated results of density and viscosity inthe volcanic materials of the Razjerd district by the 2010improved MAGMA program (Wohletz 1999) are presentedin Table 6. As shown, the globules are dramatically moreviscous (about 103–104 orders in magnitude) and denser(about 100–200 kg/m3 more) than the matrix outside theglobules. Also, other ejecta, such as bombs and scoria havemore or less viscosities similar than those of the matrix ofG-lavas (outside the globules). As a comparison, theshoshonitic basaltic neighbouring lava has a higher densityfor a strong lower viscosity (Table 6; Fig. 10).

    Discussion

    Spherical figures, at different scales, are exhibited in thevolcanic rocks of different magmatic provinces around theworld in very various conditions including: weathering,

    Table 5 (continued)

    Sample No. G1 GF1 R1 R2 R5 R8 R13Globule Matrix (outside the globule) G-Lava Bomb Scoria Shoshonitic Basalt

    Ta 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2

    W 2 2 2 2 2 3 1

    Tl

  • hydrovolcanism, nucleation, magma mixing/mingling, mag-matic immiscibility and fluid-melt exsolution.

    Weathering

    At first glance, it might have been thought that the easilyseparated globules in the Iran samples are secondary inorigin (possibly the result of weathering or devitrification,e.g. Lasaga and Kirkpatrick 1981) or that they differ incomposition from the matrix. But the detailed petrographi-cal observations reported here show otherwise. It means thatthe absence of devitrified products, such as spherulites andor axiolites and also unfilled vesicles (Fig. 4d) even in thescoria horizons show that these samples are completely

    fresh and unaltered without any post-solidification effects.Also, we did not observe the secondary minerals, such aschlorite and secondary silica after hyaline mesostasis and orsericite after feldspar. Still, the colour contrast in the glassymesostasis of the globules and the matrix (Fig. 4a, b) havebeen well preserved. Because of this, it can be concludedthat the volcanic rocks in the succession were notundergone the deuteric and or low-temperature alterations(e.g. weathering, diagenesis and so on).

    Hydrovolcanism

    Spherical features are produced by hydrovolcanic process-es at different scale, as pillow-lavas (Wohletz and

    Fig. 4 Microphotographs ofvolcanic rocks from the Razjerddistrict (PPL). a Two globulesembedded in the matrix withthe same texture andmineralogy (note thedifferences in colour betweenthe mesostasis in the globulesand matrix); b trachytic texturethat continues across theboundary between matrix andan embryonic globule; c threecoalesced globules with triplepoint junctions meeting atangles of 120°; and d vesiculartexture in the scoriaceoushorizon with its unfilledvesicles and cavities

    Fig. 5 Representative chemicalcompositions of feldspars (a)and pyroxenes (b) in G-lavas.The compositions of mineralsin both phases (globules andmatrix) are rather similar (seetext)

    Arab J Geosci

  • Fig. 6 Backscattered electronSEM images (scale isindicated). a Globules insidematrix. Note the occurrence ofvesicles all around the globules;b detail of the matrixgroundmass (glass is dark); cdetail of the globulegroundmass (silica phase isdark); d detail of a globule(lower left) and matrix (upperright) and quenched glassbetween; e K elementcartography of (d) (1.25 hcounting time). Light areasindicate greater amount of K; fSi element cartography of (d)(1.25 h counting time). Lightareas indicate greater amountof Si; g vesicles in the matrixbetween two globules. Note thesame orientation of microliths(trachytic fluidal texture) inglobule and matrix. h detail ofthe quenched glass and vesiclesbetween a globule (lower left)and matrix (upper right)

    Fig. 7 Reflection infrared spectrometry of groundmass of matrix andglobule. Normalized reflectance scale in arbitrary unit vs. wave num-ber; 666 cm−1 is atmospheric CO2 band. a Spectra of glass of matrixand of glass of the border between globule and matrix (spot size=100×25 μm; spectra were acquired between 1,300 and 650 cm−1; and

    spectral repetition, 120 times) and obsidian of Lipari (Italy, sample F.Fröhlich) for comparison. b Spectra of groundmass of globule (spotsize=40×40 μm; spectra were acquired between 1,350 and 650 cm−1;and spectral repetition, 500 times) and of lechatelierite, Libyan DesertGlass (Fröhlich 1989) for comparison

    Arab J Geosci

  • McQueen 1984), accretionary lapillis (Schumacher andSchmincke 1995) and peperites (Corsaro and Mazzoleni2002; Donaire et al. 2002; Jerram and Stollhofen 2002).

    But it is clear that our case study is very different, as Iranianglobules are not vitreous as pillows and are one magnitude ofsize less; they do not present concentric structures as accre-tionary lapillis and have the same chemical composition astheir matrix that differ from the peperites.

    Nucleation

    Spherules, also named varioles, mm to cm in size, sometimesmore, are globular structures widespread in komatiites and insome basalts, especially in Archean volcanic sequences (Gélinaset al. 1977; Arndt and Nisbet 1982; Fowler et al. 1986, 2002;Arndt and Fowler 2004). Different types of varioles have beendescribed, linked to different origins (alteration, magma min-gling and immiscibility?).

    Moreover, formation of varioles could be explained bynucleation in magma with high volatile contents (Arndt andFowler 2004). This could involve crystals growth accordingto cooling of superheated liquids and/or loss of volatiles,and then form spherical structures.

    It is possible that variations of volatile contents in liquid,involving nucleation and crystal growing have played a rolein the formation of Iranian G-lavas.

    Fig. 8 Chemical compositions of rock samples from the Razjerddistrict, as shown in the TAS diagram of Le Maitre et al. (2002). Rocks(shoshonitic basalt, shoshonitic trachybasalt and andesite) from neigh-bouring Abazar district (Asiabanha et al. 2012) are plotted for com-parison. Abbreviations: A andesite, B basalt, BA basaltic andesite, BTAbasaltic trachyandesite, D dacite, T trachyte, TA trachyandesite, TBtrachybasalt, TD trachydacite, R rhyolite. Analyses were recalculatedto 100 % on a LOI-free basis

    a

    b

    c

    d

    e

    f

    Fig. 9 Spider diagrams forvolcanic products from theRazjerd district in MORB-(Pearce 1983) and chondrite-normalised (Boynton 1984)plots

    Arab J Geosci

  • Magma mixing/mingling

    Some globule-bearing rocks have been interpreted in termsof magma mixing and mingling (e.g. Clark et al. 1987;Eichelberger 1980; Freundt and Schmincke 1992). Freundtand Schmincke (1992) defined a general type of texture asan “emulsion texture” in which sharply defined roundishbodies of one component are suspended in the other coherentcomponent.

    Schreiber et al. (1999) described one example fromWesterwald in Germany where a globule-rich horizon isfound at the contact between a latitic dyke and a trachytichost. On its border with the trachyte, the latite forms severalfinger-like smaller dykes. With increasing distance from themain body of latite, the small fingers turn into schlieren thatare finally dispersed as small spherical inclusions or glob-ules. The prominent mineralogical and chemical contrastsbetween globules and their matrix are worth noting (forexample, enrichment of Nb, Rb, Th and Zr in the globulesand depletion in Ca, Mg, Ti, Fe, Sr and Ba, globules show adepletion in MREEs). Moreover, Schreiber et al. (1999)stated that the globules were developed in the magma cham-ber before eruption. Because of the apparent chemical con-trasts between the globules and the host rock, Schreiber et al.(1999) concluded that they formed as a result of magmamingling. On contrary, Iranian globules studied in thispaper have the same chemical composition as the matrix allaround.

    Magmatic immiscibility

    Immiscibility is the contrary of the mixing: a single-phaseliquid is becoming unstable and separated spontaneously intwo immiscible phases. Such a phenomenon has been ob-served by Creig since 1927. It is well known in glassinclusions, especially in an andesitic context (West Indies,Kamtchatka). In the groundmass of andesitic lavas of MonteArci, Sardinia, red brown vitreous spheres, less than 3 μm indiameter, TiO2 (17 wt.%) and P2O5 (7 wt.%) rich but silica(30 wt.%) poor are scattered inside a clear glass of daciticcomposition (Clocchiatti 1979). By experimentation, an im-miscibility field has been defined (Philpotts 1979; Roedder1951). At a larger scale, such phenomenon is invoked toexplain the genesis of peculiar magmas as carbonatites(Hamilton et al. 1979; Peterson 1990).

    According to Anderko and Pitzer (1993) and Botcharnikovet al. (2004), increasing activity of H2O in the shallow-depthcrustal magmatic settings resulted into increasing immiscibilitytend in the fluids. Visser and Koster van Gross (1979) notedthat minor additions of nonsilicate anions have significanteffects on liquid immiscibility.

    Roedder and Stalder (1988) stated that the pressure dropwill certainly affect the onset of immiscibility in the ascendingmagma through the surface. Moreover, Giggenbach (1987)and Shmulovich and Churakov (1998) observed that subsur-face magmatic degassing can occur at low, near-surface pres-sures if the magma chambers are connected to the surface.

    Table 6 Computational water content, viscosity and density values of volcanic samples of the Razjerd area with MAGMA program (Wohletz1999)

    Volcanic materials SiO2 (wt.%) H2O (wt.%) Viscositya (Pa.s) Viscosityb (Pa.s) Densityb (kg/m3)

    Globule 66.90 0.85 1.70E+06 5.01E+04 2,495

    Matrix 64.60 3.84 9.36E+03 7.99E+03 2,386

    Bomb 65.40 3.34 1.98E+04 1.82E+04 2,399

    Scoria 63.00 5.34 1.88E+03 4.22E+03 2,341

    Shoshonitic basaltic lava 45.20 2.79 1.06E+02 2.13E+02 2,806

    a Shaw (1972)b Bottinga and Weil (1972)

    Fig. 10 Variation diagrams ofviscosity (in Pascal seconds)against silica (a) and H2O (inweight per cent) (b) based onthe results of Table 6. Asshown, the H2O content andviscosity of globules (filledcircle) in G-lava are less andmore than matrix (open circle),respectively. Other symbols:cross, bomb; star, scoria; andrectangle, shoshonitic basalt

    Arab J Geosci

  • The forming of two immiscible melts by magmatic degass-ing in the Campanian Ignimbrite of central Italy was reported bySignorelli et al. (2001). Elsewhere, Kratzmann et al. (2009)attributed colour differences in glassy bands of pumice lapilliin the Hudson volcano of Chile to variations in vesiculation. Asimilar interpretation was made by Davidson et al. (2004) forbanded pumice clasts from the Damavand volcano in Iran.

    Although chemical compositions of the samples studiedin this paper could show some evidence of magmatic im-miscibility, the chemical differences between the globulesand matrix of the G-lava are not considerable. Globule andmatrix contain respectively 67.6 and 67.4 wt.% of SiO2, 8.9and 9.5 wt.% of (FeOt+MgO+MnO+TiO2+CaO+P2O5)and 23.5 and 23.1 wt.% of (Al2O3+K2O+Na2O). Note thatthese compositions are very close to the immiscibility fielddescribed by Roedder (1951). But G-lava differs from mostcases study of magma immiscibility, which result in twoclearly different in composition melts (Roedder 1978, 1979;Charlier and Grove 2012). Thus, it seems that it is notprobable that the G-lavas could result from a magmaticimmiscibility process.

    Fluid-melt exsolution

    Although G-lavas occur in the same stratigraphic level than theandesitic lavas located in the neighbouring area (Asiabanha etal. 2012), the whole rock chemical composition of G-lava in theRazjerd district correspond to a dacite. The two lavas (andesiteand dacite) exhibit rather similar petrographic characteristics.We note an increase of SiO2, K2O and H2O and a decrease ofFe2O3, MgO and CaO from andesite to dacite. According tothese three arguments (field, petrography and geochemistry), itcan be envisaged that the andesitic melt was locally differen-tiated into the dacitic liquid. During such a process, theevolving melt might be oversaturated in the volatile contents.Thus, the occurrence of scoriaceous horizons and also theabundant volcanic bombs can be explained by the vesiculationof magma followed by an increase in volatile contents inthe chamber at the near surface levels, and the consequentformation of foam-rich horizons in the melt.

    We note that there is not any H2O-bearing mineral phasethat is likely due to volatile vesiculation in the shallow levels.

    For explaining the distinctive differences in H2O contentsof globules and matrix, it could be envisaged that the fluid-melt exsolution occurred in the volcanic conduit. Veksler(2004) suggested that the aluminosilicate melts at pressuresbelow 1 GPa and temperatures less than 900 °C may haveexsolved two aqueous fluids of contrasting density andsalinity. It seems that the dacite magma in the Razjerddistrict was experienced a magmatic degassing due to sig-nificant pressure drop. The silica-richer liquid separatedfrom the matrix as the spherical masses. Moreover, theconsequential contrast in viscosities might have contributed

    to the formation of two distinct phases: the globules andtheir matrix.

    Aqueous fluid exsolution from silicate melts in the late-stageof crystallisation process was proposed firstly by Brögger(1890) and later by Jahns and Burnham (1969) for generationof granitic pegmatites. Also, the role of fluxing components(including H2O, B, F and P) in reduction of melting/crystallisa-tion temperatures and also the immiscibility fields was stated byLondon (2005).

    On the other hand, Merritt (1924a, b) advocated viscoussilicate gels as the pegmatite-forming medium, and gel-based models for pegmatites have been proposed againmore recently (e.g. Merino 1999; Taylor et al. 2002).According to London (2005), the concentration of H2O orother fluxing components needed to form gels.

    Moreover, Halter and Webster (2004) stated that phaseseparation occurs when the solubility of the volatile phasesin the silicate melt is exceeded. So, the bulk system enters animmiscibility domain where two or more phases (typically asilicate melt and an aqueous fluid) is favoured over a singlemixed liquid.

    Different evidences in the Razjerd district confirm thatthe G-lava might be formed by exsolution of a silicatemelt/gel (globules) from the aqueous fluid (matrix): enrich-ment of globules in SiO2 relative to matrix; the highercrystallinity of the globules than the matrix; the molten stateof globules during eruption; the chemical distinctivechanges across the quenched border of globules.

    Concluding remarks

    Razjerd district lavas situated on western Alborz Ranges,Northern Iran, present an unusual and peculiar case study inwhere a hypocrystalline dacitic lava (G-lava) contains abun-dant 0.1- to 5.0-cm spherical masses (or globules) set in amatrix of nearly similar composition and microtexture. TheG-lava level contains scoriaceous lenses, ellipsoidal-shapedejecta or volcanic bombs. Stratigraphically, this level isunderlain by shoshonitic basaltic lava.

    Spherical globules of the G-lava are arranged in thedirection of lava flow, and many have coalesced. The lineararrangement of microlites of plagioclase across the contactsof globules and matrix and also triple point junction withangles of 120° confirms that the globules were in a liquidstate during eruption and during flowing of lava. Theirabundance (up to 60 vol.%) in particular horizons presentsa stratified appearance.

    The globules and their matrix are very similar in mineral-ogy and texture. In both phases, the microphenocrysts ofplagioclase (An25–67), augite, enstatite and magnetite are em-bedded in a trachytic groundmass. However, because of dif-ferences in colour between the mesostasis of the globules

    Arab J Geosci

  • (darker) and matrix (clearer), it is evident that they are notentirely of the same composition.

    The field, petrographic and chemical considerations us-ing whole-rock chemistry, microprobe analysis, SEM anal-ysis and reflection IR spectrometry show that:

    1. Despite of apparent similarities, the globules are a fewricher in Si and K and poorer in LOI components.

    2. The globules were covered by a quenched border (5–15 μm in thickness) that is heterogenous in composi-tion. It means that the Si and Al proportions are de-creased and Fe content is increased from core to rim(Fig. 11).

    3. The size of glassy mesostasis in the globules is smaller(

  • Soufriere volcano, West Indies and Cerro Chiquito, Guatemala.Terra Nova 4:553–566

    Botcharnikov RE, Behrens H, Holtz F, Koepke J, Sato H (2004) Sulfurand chlorine solubility in Mt. Unzen rhyodacitic melt at 850 °Cand 200 MPa. Chem Geol 213:207–225

    Bottinga YA, Weil DF (1972) The viscosity of magmatic silicateliquids: a model for calculation. Am J Sci 272:438–473

    Boynton WV (1984) Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements:meteorite studies. In: Henderson P (ed) Rare earth element geo-chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 63–114

    Brögger WC (1890) Die Mineralien der Syenitpegmatitgänge derSüdnorwegischen Augit- und Nephelin-syenite. Zeitschrift fürKristallographie und Mineralogie 16:1–63

    Charlier B, Grove TL (2012) Experiments on liquid immiscibilityalong tholeiitic liquid lines of descent. Contrib Mineral Petrol164:27–44

    Clark S, Spera FJ, Yuen DA (1987) Steady state double-diffusiveconvection in magma chambers heated from below. In: MysenBO (ed) Magmatic processes: physicochemical principles. Geo-chemical Society, Special Publication, pp. 289–305

    Clocchiatti R (1979) Découverte dans la mésostase des laves à affinitéandésitique du Monte Arci (Sardaigne occidentale) de verresriches en titane et phosphore et élargissement du domaine d’im-miscibilité entre liquides silicatés. Comptes Rendus de l’Académiedes Sciences, Paris 289:607–610

    Corsaro RA, Mazzoleni P (2002) Textural evidence of peperites insidepillow lavas at Acicastello Castle Rock (Mt. Etna, Sicily). JVolcanol Geotherm Res 114:219–229

    Creig JW (1927) Immiscibility in silicate melts. Am J Sci 13:133–154Davidson J, Hassanzadeh J, Berzins R, Stockli DF, Bashukooh B,

    Turrin B, Pandamouz A (2004) The geology of Damavand Volcano,Alborz Mountains, Northern Iran. Geol Soc Am Bull 116:16–29

    Donaire T, Sáez R, Pascual E (2002) Rhyolitic globular peperites fromthe Aznalcóllar mining district (Iberian Pyrite Belt, Spain): physicaland chemical controls. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 114:119–128

    Eichelberger JC (1980) Vesiculation of mafic magma during replenishmentof silicic magma reservoirs. Nature 288:446–450

    Fowler AD, Jensen LS, Peloquin SA (1986) Varioles in Archean basalts:products of spherulitic crystallization. Canadian Mineralogists25:275–289

    Fowler AD, Berger B, Shore M, Jones MI, Ropchan J (2002) Super-cooled rocks: development and significance of varioles, spheru-lites, dendrites and spinifex in Archean volcanic rocks, AbitibiGreenstone Belt, Canada. Precambrian Res 115:311–328

    Freundt A, Schmincke HU (1992) Mixing of rhyolite, trachyte andbasalt magma erupted from a vertically and laterally zoned reser-voir, composite flow P1, Gran Canaria. Contrib Mineral Petrol112:1–19

    Fröhlich F (1989) Deep-sea biogenic silica: new structural andanalytical data from infrared analysis—geological implications. TerraNova 1:267–273

    Gélinas L, Brooks C, Trzcienski WE (1977) Archean variolitesquenched immiscible liquids. Can J Earth Sci 13:210–230

    Giggenbach WF (1987) Redox processes governing the chemistry offumarolic gas discharges from White Island, New Zealand. ApplGeochem 2:143–161

    Halter WE, Webster JD (2004) The magmatic to hydrothermal transitionand its bearing on ore-forming systems. Chem Geol 210:1–6

    Hamilton DL, Freestone IC, Dawnson JB, Donaldson CH (1979)Origin of carbonatites by liquid immiscibility. Nature 279:52–54

    Hosseini M (1988) Magmatic immiscibility in a dacitic lava. In:Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of Geological Society of Iran.(in Farsi)

    Jahns RH, Burnham CW (1969) Experimental studies of pegmatitegenesis: I. A model for the derivation and crystallization ofgranitic pegmatites. Econ Geol 64:843–864

    Jerram DA, Stollhofen H (2002) Lava-sediment interaction in desertsettings; are all peperitelike textures the result of magma-waterinteraction. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 114:231–249

    Kratzmann DJ, Carey S, Scasso R, Naranjo JA (2009) Compositionalvariations and magma mixing in the 1991 eruptions of Hudsonvolcano, Chile. Bull Volcanol 71:419–439

    Kushiro I, Yoder HS Jr, Mysen BO (1976) Viscosities of basalt andandesite melts at high pressures. J Geophys Res 81:6351–6356

    Lasaga AC, Kirkpatrick RJ (1981) Kinetics of geochemical processes.Mineralogical Society of America, pp. 1–398

    Le Maitre RW, Streckeisen A, Zanetti B, Le Bas MJ, Bonin B,Bateman P, Bellieni G, Dudek A, Efremova S, Keller J,Lameyre J, Sabine PA, Schmid R, Sørensen H, Wooley AR(2002) Igneous rocks, a classification and glossary of terms.(Recommendations of the international union of geologicalsciences subcommission on the systematics of igneous rocks).Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    London D (2005) Granitic pegmatites: an assessment of current conceptsand directions for the future. Lithos 80:281–303

    Merino E (1999) Origin of agates and other supposed vesicle fillings;an overlooked reaction to produce silica gels in basalt flows. EOSTrans Am Geophys Union 80:1122

    Merritt CA (1924a) The function of gels in the formation of pegmatitesand of quartz and carbonate veins. M.Sc. thesis, University ofManitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    Merritt CA (1924b) The function of colloids in pegmatitic growths.Proc Trans R Soc Can 17:61–68

    Middlemost EAK (1989) Iron oxidation ratios, norms and the classificationof volcanic rocks. Chem Geol 77:19–26

    Pearce JA (1983) Role of the sub-continental lithosphere in magmagenesis at active continental margins. In: Hawkesworth CJ, NorryMJ (eds) Continental basalts and mantle xenoliths. Shiva,Nantwic, pp 230–249

    Peterson TD (1990) Petrology and genesis of natrocarbonatite. ContribMineral Petrol 105:143–155

    Philpotts AR (1979) Silicate immiscibility in tholeiitic basalts. J Petrol20:99–118

    Roedder E (1951) Low temperature liquid immiscibility in the systemK2O–FeO–Al2O3–SiO2. Am Mineral 36:282–286

    Roedder E (1978) Silicate liquid immiscibility in magmas and in thesystem K2O–FeO–Al2O3–SiO2: an example of serendipity. GeochimCosmochim Acta 42:1597–1617

    Roedder E (1979) Silicate liquid immiscibility in magmas. In: YoderHS Jr (ed) The evolution of the igneous rocks. Fiftieth Anniver-sary Perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 15–57

    Roedder E, Stalder HA (1988) “Pneumatolysis” and fluid-indusionevidence for crystal growth from a vapour phase. Mem GeolSoc India 11:1–12

    Schreiber U, Anders D, Koppen J (1999) Mixing and chemical inter-diffusion of trachytic and latitic magma in a subvolcanic complexof the Tertiary Westerwald (Germany). Lithos 46:695–714

    Schumacher R, Schmincke HU (1995) Models for the origin of accre-tionary lapilli. Bull Volcanol 56:626–639

    Shaw HR (1972) Viscosities of magmatic silicate liquids: an empiricalmethod of prediction. Am J Sci 272:870–893

    Shmulovich KI, Churakov SV (1998) Natural fluid phases at hightemperatures and low pressures. J Geochem Explor 62:183–191

    Signorelli S, Vaggelli G, Romano C, Carroll MR (2001) Volatileelement zonation in Campanian Ignimbrite magmas (PhlegreanFields, Italy): evidence from the study of glass inclusions andmatrix glasses. Contrib Mineral Petrol 140:543–553

    Taylor MC, Sheppard JB, Walker JN, Kleck WD, Wise MA (2002)Petrogenesis of rare-element granitic aplite–pegmatites: a

    Arab J Geosci

  • new approach. International Mineralogical Association Gen-eral Meeting Program with Abstracts, 18:260

    Veksler IV (2004) Liquid immiscibility and its role at the magmatic-hydrothermal transition: a summary of experimental studies. ChemGeol 210:7–31

    Visser W, Koster van Gross AE (1979) Effects of P2O5 and TiO2 onliquid-liquid equilibria in the system K2O-FeO-Al2O3-SiO2. Am JSci 279:970–988

    Wohletz KH (1999) MAGMA: Calculates IUGS Volcanic RockClassification, Densities, and Viscosities. Los Alamos NationalLaboratory computer code LA-CC 99–28, Los Alamos NewMexico

    Wohletz KH, McQueen RG (1984) Experimental studies of hydro-magmatic volcanism. In.: Studies in geophysics, explosive volca-nism: inception, evolution, and hazards. National Academy Press,Washington, pp. 158–169

    Arab J Geosci

    Globule-rich lavas in the Razjerd district, Qazvin, Iran: a unique volcanic fabricAbstractIntroductionGeological settingField relations and volcanic fabricsAnalytical methodsPetrography and mineral chemistryGlobule-bearing hypocrystalline lavaScoriaGroundmass in G-lava

    Whole-rock chemistryMajor element chemistryTrace element chemistryPhysical parameters

    DiscussionWeatheringHydrovolcanismNucleationMagma mixing/minglingMagmatic immiscibilityFluid-melt exsolution

    Concluding remarksReferences