Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global warming and changes in geographic range of plant pests:
the case of the pine processionary moth Th m t p pit mpThaumetopoea pityocampa
Alain ROQUES Alain ROQUES INRA Zoologie Forestière
Orléans, France
Global climate warmed up by ca. 0.5ºC during the 20th century
… and is predicted to change even more in the future
EEA Report No 4/2008
Rise by 1 6°C predicted by IPCC scenariosRise by 1- 6°C predicted by IPCC scenarios
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Direct and indirect impact of global change on insect species of global change on insect species
Δ temperatureΔ rainfallΔ isolationΔ extreme events
Δ CO2, CH4, O3, NO,…
Natural i lit
y,
rate
,
Host plantsenemies Competitors
rviv
al, F
erti
velo
pmen
t rD
ispe
rsal
Insect Population
Sur
Dev
R bi & R i Z l 2010
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Robinet & Roques, Integrative Zoology 2010
Is the insect response linear ? What is the biological significance of a 1°C increase i l in annual mean temperature ?
Annual mean Winter Summer
EEA Report No 4/2008
Assymetry in warming: Minimal vs. maximal temperatures; season (warming in spring, summer, autumn and winter will not have the same effects because of the insect development stages); regions, same effects because of the insect development stages); regions, …
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Survive or die: the importance of an (even li ht) i i i t t tslight) increase in winter temperatures
Under temperate latitudes, low temperatures constitute a key factor limiting the range through minimal, letal thresholds of development for the various stages of the insect (egg, larva, adult)
The northern (and altitudinal) movement of the isotherms corresponding to letal minimal thresholds allow the insects to expandexpand
Climate change may remove/relocate barriers that delimit the insect rangeg
URTICLIM and ECONET-Balkans: 2 recent projects to precise PPM expansion and adaptations at the front edge
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
PPM, a mediterranean insect with a winter larval developmentp
A model for climate change (IPCC)
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
A clear expansion in latitude and altitude observed since the 1990s in Europe- Example: FrancePPM distributionbetween 1969 and 1979 PPM distributionin 2005-2006
PPM distributionin 2010-2011
PPM distributionin 2010-2011
and pioneer colonies detected between 2003 and 2011
Source: INRA Orléans
Source: CTGREF report (1980)
Orléans, northward edge defined on
Source: INRA Orléans, northward
Source: INRA Orléans, northward report (1980)8 km grid cells
northward edge defined on 8 km grid
ll
northward edge defined on 8 km grid
llcellscells
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
A 100 km latitudinal shift in the Paris basin since 1972 with a significant acceleration since 1992with a significant acceleration since 1992
Northwards shift near Paris
Robinet et al. 2010
Unpubl. data
- by 2.6 km/yr from 1972 to 2011- by 5.5 km/yr from 1996 to 2011
whilst mean winter temperature increased by 1°C
19711992199620052011
7
8
9
ure
(°C
)
1994-2003
by 1 C
3
4
5
6
nim
um te
mpe
ratu
0
1
2
3M
ean
of m
in
1972-1990
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
A similar expansion in altitude in the Italian AlpsTrend of total infested area (>1 nest/tree) and mean elevation of the i f t d i th di t i t N S l f T ti t l Al t th infested area in the district Non-Sole of Trentino, central Alps, at the northern edge of the distribution range of T. pityocampa
y = 7.97x ‐ 1510R² = 0.575
18002000
1000
1200
a (m
)
Altitude Area Linear (Altitude)
- 7.0 m/yr on sunny side
- 2.9 m/yr on 1000120014001600
600
800
1000
d area
(ha)
nfested are a
shaded side
200400600800
200
400
Infested
altitud
e of i
0200
01985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010M
ean
YearBattisti et al. unpublished
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Winter warming up= release of the thermal constraints preventing range expansion
TEMPERATURE
constraints preventing range expansion
>-16°C + Battisti et al. 2005
Realized Feeding Threshold (RFT)
T nest > 9°C(day)
Activation T
T air > 0°C(following night)
Potential feeding T
IMMEDIATE SURVIVAL
g
FEEDING
LONG-TERM SURVIVAL
Buffo et al. 2007
SURVIVAL
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
The natural expansion is clearly related to the release of thermal constraints to developmentrelease of thermal constraints to development
1992 1996 2000 2004 h1992-1996PARIS
MelunMelunPARIS
2000-2004PARIS
Melun2004
MelunPARIS
er t
o M
arch
Orléans19921996
Orléans Orléans19921996
2004
Orléans
ays
Oct
obe
ToursTours ToursTours
No more barrier:Thermal barrier: fee
ding
da
No more barrier:
All the Paris basin became favourable
Thermal barrier:
Expansion not possible
Num
ber
of
Robinet et al. , Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007
N
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Contradictory effects of climate change and role of extreme events: the 2003 heatand role of extreme events: the 2003 heat
Winter 2002- 2003: Warming up favorable to the survival of the populations all over the range
Summer 2003: Heat waves affecting differently the
HEAT
Su e 003 eat a es a ect g d e e t y t epopulations according to regions and topography
COLLAPSE
HISTORICAL
T>40°C
T>30°C Flight Eggs Larvae
Flight Eggs Larvae
Italian Al
ParisBasin
ALTITUDINAL EXPANSION
g ggAlps
Summer Autumn
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
The low flight capabilities of females limits the natural expansionthe natural expansion
Robinet et al. Biol. Inv. 2011
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
An apparent paradox:th i i f t i f t d the expansion is faster in non-forested areas
Black pine the prefered host densely planted as ornamentals along motorways Black pine, the prefered host, densely planted as ornamentals along motorways, in schools, on village places, …acts as relays for the expansionNiche saturation is more rapid than in forests and females have to move
Agricultural Beauce:A pine every Km
Mean = 1 05 km
A pine every Km
km
Mean = 1,05 km
Distance to the nearest pine
km
If ♀ flight ~ 3-5 km⇒ 98% of the pines available
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Development of a model of natural expansion in the Paris basinin the Paris basin
Diffusion model using a Diffusion model using a diffusion coefficient of 3km, a mortality function based on the feeding indicator (TD>9 and TN>0), taking into account i d i i h i
< 1 pin/ha1-10 pins/ha10-50 pins/ha
pine density in the carrying capacity, and with a threshold temperature Wc=2.78°C for the mean of daily temperatures from October to March.
50-100 pins/ha> 100 pins/ha
o Octobe to a c
Model fitted with the 1981-2004 data, then tested for 2005, and finally fed with the « less worst » climatic scenario « less worst » climatic scenario of GIEC (B2: doubling of CO2 between 1975 and 2100, mean increase of annual temperature of 2.3°C) to predict until 2050
R bi 2006
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Robinet, 2006
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Comparison predicted- realized
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine Robinet et al.,
20095 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
2009
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
4
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
TN Oct Mars - Orléans
4
5
6
Minimal temperature Oct- March (°C)
0
1
2
3
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016
PARIS
Ch t
Paris intra-
FontainebleauChartres
Orléans Montargisintra-muros reached in 2025 ?
Orléans
Gien0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine
0 – 0.01 nest / pine0.01 – 1 nest / pine1 – 5 nests / pine5 – 10 nests / pine in 2025 ?
NeversBourges
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
5 – 10 nests / pine10 – 50 nests / pine> 50 nests / pine
3456 Minimal temperature
Oct- March (°C)
0123
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Is the expansion only natural ? At least 9 isolated colonies recently detected far beyond the front
2003 (40 km)2007 (40 km)
2008(190 km)
2008(50 km)
Front 2005-2006
Were do they come from ? The expanding area or far beyond ?y p g y
How can they survive far beyond the natural front ?
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Robinet et al. Biol. Inv. 2011
DNA+ parasitoid analysis congruent Isolated colonies = mostly long-distance jumpsIsolated colonies = mostly long-distance jumps
First rank DNA microsatellites microsatellites assignements
Robinet et al Biol Inv 2011
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Robinet et al. Biol. Inv. 2011
The likely pathway: The trade of mature trees moving PPM pupae
Translocation of large trees
The trade of mature trees moving PPM pupae
Translocation of large trees (« grow » faster) is spatially moving a mini- ecosystem with nymphal stages in soil. If transported before the late 1990s, the moth offspring could not survive the harsh winter conditions in northern areas conditions in northern areas. At present, the combination of global warming and translocation of large pine trees is susceptible of large pine trees is susceptible to allow long-distance jump, the moth being considered as an invader
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Global warming allow translocated PPM to establish self sustaining colonies far beyond the natural rangeself-sustaining colonies far beyond the natural range
Ob i (F h G b d )
0.45
0.549
49.2
Metz SaarebrückenKarlsruhe
49
49.2
Obernai (French- German border):
0 25
0.3
0.35
0.4
48 2
48.4
48.6
48.8
ObernaiStrasbourg
NancyKarlsruhe
48 2
48.4
48.6
48.8
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
47 6
47.8
48
48.2
Basel47 6
47.8
48
48.2
0.05 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.247.6
période 1988-1997 période 1998-2007
6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.247.6
Establishment impossible in the early 1990s; colonies established since stab s e t poss b e t e ea y 990s; co o es estab s ed s ce2007 from accidental transportation with black pines used for runabouts
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Urban heated islands: PPM survival is even favoured in large cities once colonized favoured in large cities once colonized
Pontoise Severe 15-day cold period in the 75 8%Pontoise
2009
PARIS
Severe 15 day cold period in the Paris basin during January 2009
-12 5-1379.1%
75.8%75.9%
81.7%
2009
PARIS
2004
2009
-12
12.5
-1375.1%
74.0%2004
2009
1972
1992
1996
Orléans
-14
Nb hours where T<070.5%71.6%1972
1992
1996
Orléans1972 OrléansAbsolute minimum T
1972 Orléans
% larval survival
Robinet et al Biol Inv 2011
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Robinet et al. Biol. Inv. 2011
Slope and insolation, key factors for the altitudinal expansionfor the altitudinal expansion
Probability of presence
LowLikely
+0°C+1°C+2°C+3°C+4°C
Likely
Non évaluée (> 1900 m)
Very likely
Val Venosta (Italy)
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Take- home messagesg
PPM is naturally expanding northwards and upwards with global y p g p gwarming
A large part of Europe is at present favourable to establishment but PPM colonizes it slowly (ca 5km/ yr) due to the limited flight but PPM colonizes it slowly (ca 5km/ yr) due to the limited flight capabilities of females
Colonies accidentally introduced into favourable areas with mature ytrees are likely to establish, especially in urban areas
Insolation, which may-be not affected by global warming, constitutes a threshold for nest heatingconstitutes a threshold for nest heating
The actual expansion finally results from the combination of global warming, the development of ornamental pine plantations, and the
lg p p p
increasing trade of mature trees from already- infested areas.
ESFA, Parma, 9 June 2011
Thank you for your attention !
ICBI2009, Fuzhou, 2-6 November 2009