Upload
bita
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHAPTER2222 -
IUFoST Wo
� 2009 Else
Nanotechnology andApplications in Food SafetyBita Farhang
Contents
I. Introduction 402II. Potential Food Applications 403
II.A. Food packaging 403II.B. Detection of foodborne pathogens and their toxins 406II.C. Detection of chemicals and contaminants 407II.D. Nanodevices for identity preservation and tracking 407
III. Regulation 408IV. Conclusion 408References 409
Abstract
Nanotechnology involves research and technology development at theatomic, molecular, and macromolecular levels, aimed at creating andusing structures, devices, and systems with novel properties andfunctions based on their small size. It is strategically a very importantresearch field with considerable industrial potential.
Over the past few years nanotechnology has rapidly becomea significant component in the food industry, applications ranging fromsmart packaging to interactive foods. Major food producers are presentlyusing nanotechnology to improve food quality but the future belongs tonew products and processes and customization of such products, as thenanofood market worldwide is expected to increase monetarily to over$20.4 billion in 2010.
Indeed, nanotechnology could provide innovative answers to currentproblems concerning food safety. Recent developments show manyapplications of nanotechnology that improve the quality and safety offood products; for example, nanosensors to detect pathogens andcontaminants and nanodevices to identify preservation and tracking. Infood packaging, nanomaterials are being developed with enhancedmechanical and thermal properties to improve protection of foodsagainst exterior mechanical, thermal, chemical, or microbiological effects.Some potential uses in food packaging include modifying permeationbehavior of foils, increasing barrier properties, improving mechanical andheat-resistance properties, developing active antimicrobial and antifungal
rld Congress Book: Global Issues in Food Science and Technology ISBN 9780123741240
vier Inc. All rights reserved.
401
402 Bita Farhang
surfaces, and sensing and signaling microbiological and biochemicalchanges.
Given the importance of this novel technology in making food safe toeat, this chapter will provide insights into the potential benefits ofnanotechnology in food safety.
I. INTRODUCTION
Recent trends in global food production, processing, distribution, and
preparation are creating an increasing demand for food safety research to
ensure a safer global food supply. Food safety is therefore an increasingly
important public health issue and governments all over the world are
intensifying their efforts to improve food safety procedures. These efforts are
also in response to an increasing number of food safety problems and rising
consumer concerns (WHO, 2006).
One of the new technologies to improve food safety is nanotechnology,
which is the manipulation or self-assembly of individual atoms, molecules,
or molecular clusters into structures, the purpose of which is to create
materials and devices with new or vastly different properties (Joseph and
Morrison, 2006).
This new technology deals with controlling the properties of matter
with dimensions between 1 and 100 nanometers. One nanometer is equal
to one billionth of a meter, and is about the size of a small molecule
(ElAmin, 2005). Therefore it can be said that nanotechnology focuses on
the characterization, fabrication, and manipulation of biological and non-
biological structures smaller than 100 nanometers. Structures on this scale
have been shown to have unique and novel functional properties (Weiss
et al., 2006).
Nanotechnology will enable the manufacture of high-quality products at
a very low cost and fast pace. It is commonly referred to as a generic
technology that offers better-built, safer, longer-lasting, cheaper, and
smarter non-food products with wide applications in consumer households,
the communications industry, and medicine field, however there is even
more potential in the agriculture and food industry (Warad and Dutta,
2006).
According to a recent report by the consulting company, Cientifica, the
value of nanotechnologies in the food industry reached $410 million in
2006, with applications restricted primarily to food packaging for improved
gas barrier protection and improved nutraceutical delivery systems. Today
more than 200 companies around the world are active in research and
development. The United States is the leader followed by Japan and China.
The Asian market, comprising more than 50% of the world’s population,
Nanotechnology and Applications in Food Safety 403
will be the biggest market for nanofood by 2010 with China leading
(Moraru et al., 2003).
Nanotechnology can be used in food processing and storage as nano-
composites for plastic film coatings in food packaging, as antimicrobial
nanoemulsions for decontamination of food equipment, in packaging, and
as food nanotechnology-based antigens to detect biosensors for identifica-
tion of pathogen contamination (Salamanca-Buentello et al., 2005).
II. POTENTIAL FOOD APPLICATIONS
The application of nanotechnology and nanoparticles in food processing is
emerging rapidly (ElAmin, 2006). According to reports, five out of ten of
the world’s largest food and beverage companies are currently investing in
nanotechnology research and development (R&D) (Nanotechwire report,
2005).
Nanotechnology has the potential to impact many aspects of the world’s
food and agricultural systems. Some examples of the important links that
nanotechnology has to the science and engineering of these agricultural and
food systems are (Weiss et al., 2006):
� Food security
� Disease treatment delivery methods
� New tools for molecular and cellular biology
� New materials for pathogen detection
� Protection of the environment.
According to a study by Mallika et al. (2005), uses for nanotechnology in
the food industry, in addition to food security, include design of new food
products, nutrient and flavor encapsulation, microbiological food safety,
food biotechnology, beverage filtration, nano biosensors, restoring cellular
damage in foods, and food packaging. Thus, nanotechnology has the
potential to improve food quality and safety significantly. There are many
new applications of this novel technology for improving food safety in
particular (to be discussed in this chapter) such as:
� Food packaging
� Detection of foodborne pathogens and their toxins
� Detection of chemicals and contaminants
� Identity preservation and tracking.
II.A. Food packaging
Packaging is a critical key to ensuring the safety of food products. Nano-
technology can improve packaging material and its functionality and
404 Bita Farhang
consequently ensure food safety and consumer protection. Today, food
packaging and monitoring of products are a major focus of food-industry-
related nanotechnology R&D. Packaging that incorporates nanomaterials
can be ‘smart,’ which means it can respond to environmental conditions or
repair itself, or even alert a consumer about contamination and/or the
presence of pathogens. According to an industry analyst the current U.S.
market for active, controlled, smart packaging of foods and beverages is an
estimated $38 billion, and will surpass $54 billion by 2008 (ETC Group
Report, 2004). Nanotechnology makes food packaging intelligent, smart
and long-lasting, providing better safety against bacteria and microorganisms
than traditional market packaging methods. It is predicted that nanotech-
nology will change 25% of the worldwide food-packaging business in the
next decade, which means over $30 billion annually in the market
(Nanotechwire report, 2005).
Developing smart packaging to optimize product shelf life has been the
goal of many companies. Such packaging systems would be able to repair
small holes/tears, respond to environmental conditions (e.g. temperature
and moisture changes), and alert the customer if the food is contaminated.
For example, nanomaterials, which are materials with a microstructure of
characteristic length on the order of a few, typically 1–100 nanometers,
could be developed to modify the permeation behavior of foils, increase
barrier properties (mechanical, thermal, chemical, and microbial), improve
mechanical and heat-resistance properties, develop active antimicrobial and
antifungal surfaces, and sense and signal microbiological and biochemical
changes (De Jong, 2005; Joseph and Morrison, 2006).
Plastics are increasingly being used in food packaging, but there are
concerns about their ability to allow the exchange of oxygen, carbon
dioxide, water, and aroma components, which could compromise the
quality and safety of packaged foods. However nanocomposites, which are
high-barrier materials, are a potential solution to this problem (Lagaron,
2006). High-barrier materials are good barriers against oxygen, water
vapor, and aromas and also offer good barrier properties under different
packing, handling, shipping, and storage conditions.
For instance the polymer–clay nanocomposite has emerged as a novel
food-packaging material due to several benefits, such as its enhanced
mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties (Ray et al., 2006). Its use has
improved plastic packaging of food products. For example, the Bayer
Company produces a transparent plastic film containing nanoparticles of clay.
The nanoparticles are dispersed throughout the plastic and are able to block
oxygen, carbon dioxide, and moisture from reaching fresh meats or other
foods. The nanoclay also makes the plastic lighter, stronger, and more heat-
resistant (Brody, 2006). According to Avella et al. (2005), biodegradable
Nanotechnology and Applications in Food Safety 405
starch/clay nanocomposite films can also be used for food packaging while in
a similar study Lagaron et al. (2006) showed that nanocomposites can improve
the quality and safety of packaged food.
As mentioned, researchers are even experimenting with materials that
will change their properties to address outside environmental factors such as
temperature or humidity. For instance, imagine an ice cream carton that
would tighten its existing molecular structure to prevent heat from affecting
the contents if left in the back of an automobile on a hot summer day (ETC
Group Report, 2004).
Zinc oxide and magnesium oxide nanoparticles, two in a range of nano
ingredients produced by advanced nanotechnology, could also have anti-
microbial properties. Nanotechnology researchers in the UK reported that
both zinc oxide and magnesium oxide are effective in killing microor-
ganisms (Patton, 2006). According to another research group in the UK
(University of Leeds), nanoparticles of magnesium oxide and zinc oxide
are indeed highly effective at destroying microorganisms and therefore
could have applications in food packaging (Food Production Daily
Report, 2005).
With different nanostructures, plastics can achieve various levels of gas/
water vapor permeability to fit the requirements of preserving fruits, veg-
etables, beverages, and other foods. By adding nanoparticles, food processors
can also produce bottles and packages that are more resistant to light, have
stronger mechanical and thermal performance, and are less gas absorptive.
These properties can significantly increase the shelf life, efficiently preserve
flavor and color, and facilitate transportation and usage. Further,
nanostructured film can effectively protect the food from invasion of bacteria
and microorganisms and ensure food safety. With embedded nanosensors in
the packaging, consumers will be able to ‘read’ the condition of the food
inside (Asadi and Mousavi, 2006).
Meanwhile, scientists at the University of Strathclyde (Glasgow) have
developed ‘intelligent ink’ by using light-sensitive nanoparticles that only
detect oxygen. The patented ink could be used for labels on any food, and
because it is inexpensive, it is suitable for use in large numbers. The ink
could also be used to indicate if the original modified atmosphere inside
a package has changed (Dunn, 2004).
At Kraft foods Inc, as well as at Rutgers University in the U.S., scientists
are developing an electronic tongue for inclusion in packaging. This consists
of an array of nanosensors that are extremely sensitive to gases released by
food as it spoils, causing the sensor strip to change color as a result, giving
a clear visible signal of whether the food is fresh or not ( Joseph and
Morrison, 2006).
406 Bita Farhang
II.B. Detection of foodborne pathogens and their toxins
Foodborne diseases are a widespread and growing public health problem,
both in developed and developing countries. In industrialized countries, the
percentage of people suffering from foodborne diseases each year has been
reported to be up to 30%. In the U.S., for example, there are around 76
million cases of foodborne diseases estimated to occur each year, resulting in
325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths (WHO report, 2006).
The presence of microorganisms in food is a natural and unavoidable
occurrence. Researchers are continuously searching for sensitive tools that
are fast, accurate, and ultrasensitive. In recent years, there has been much
research activity in the area of sensor development for detecting pathogenic
microorganisms (Bhunia and Lathrop, 2003). The more exciting of nano-
technology applications is the development of nanosensors that can be
placed in food production and food distribution facilities, and in the
packaging itself to detect the presence of everything from E. coli and Listeria
to Campylobacter and Salmonella (Russell, 2005; Sage, 2007).
The ever-present need for rapid and sensitive assay methods to detect
foodborne pathogens, particularly Salmonella, has led to increased
incorporation of biosensor technology into microarray and other platforms.
The use of mimetics and aptamers has been added to these procedures.
Incorporating nanoparticles, particularly fluorophores and quantum dots in
various procedures, has decreased the size of instrumentation while increasing
automation, sensitivity, and rapidity of results (Goldschmidt, 2006).
This exciting possibility of combining biology and nanoscale technology
into sensors not only holds the potential of increased sensitivity, it signifi-
cantly reduces the response-time to sense potential problems. A bioanalytical
nanosensor would be able to detect a single virus particle long before the virus
multiplied and long before symptoms are evident in plants or animals. Some
examples of potential applications for bioanalytical nanosensors are detection
of pathogens, contaminants, environmental characteristics (light/dark,
hot/cold, wet/dry), heavy metals, and particulates or allergens (Scott and
Chen, 2003).
Nanocantilevers, which look like tiny diving boards made of silicon, are
one of the types of nanoscale materials being studied as part of general
nanotechnology research. Cantilever structures are the simplest of micro-
electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) and can be easily micro-machined and
mass produced. The ability to detect extremely small displacements makes the
cantilever beams an ideal device for detection of extremely small forces and
stresses (Datskos et al., 2004). Nanocantilevers could be used as future
detectors because they vibrate at different frequencies when contaminants
stick to them, revealing the presence of dangerous substances. Nanocantilevers
Nanotechnology and Applications in Food Safety 407
coated with antibodies to detect certain viruses attract different densities – or
a quantity of antibodies per area – depending on the size of the cantilever. The
nanocantilever devices are immersed into liquid containing antibodies to
allow the proteins to stick to the nanocantilever surface (ElAmin, 2006). Also,
a nanocantilever device developed using DNA biochips, to detect pathogens
in different food products, has been applied successfully (Sage, 2007).
II.C. Detection of chemicals and contaminants
The contamination of food due to chemical hazards is a worldwide public
health concern and a leading cause of trade problems internationally.
Contamination may occur through environmental pollution of the air,
water, and soil, as in the case of toxic metals, dioxins, or the intentional use
of various chemicals, such as pesticides, animal drugs, and other
agrochemicals. Also, there are some naturally occurring toxins such as
mycotoxins, marine biotoxins, and cyanogenic glycosides that can
contaminate food (WHO, 2006). Therefore the detection of these chem-
icals in foods is critical, whereupon nanotechnology can provide a rapid
means to detecting such materials through biosensors (Hanna, 2006).
II.D. Nanodevices for identity preservation and tracking
Identity preservation (IP) is a system that creates increased value by
providing customers with information about the practices and activities used
to produce a particular crop or other agricultural product. Quality assurance
of agricultural products’ safety and security could be significantly improved
through IP at the nanoscale. Nanoscale IP holds the possibility of contin-
uous tracking and recording of history that a particular agricultural product
experiences and, further, can improve identity preservation of food and
agricultural products (Scott and Chen, 2003).
In another study by Lachance (2004), use of traceability systems for
ensuring safety and quality of nutraceutical foods and pharmaceutical
products is discussed. A composite safety system, termed intelligent product
delivery system (IPDS), is proposed for preventing introduction of chemical
and/or microbiological hazards into these products by bioterrorism. IPDS is
based on the integration of three existing technologies:
1. Global positioning systems for location of crop field or place of
manufacture
2. Bar codes
3. HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point).
It is further suggested that the IPDS can be coupled by developing rapid
nanotechnology marker assays for ensuring traceability throughout the
processing and packaging process.
408 Bita Farhang
III. REGULATION
The safety of nanoproducts has become the focus of increasing attention.
Despite the rapid commercialization of nanotechnology, no nano-specific
regulations exist anywhere in the world. Most regulatory agencies remain in
an information-gathering mode, lacking the legal and scientific tools,
information, and resources they need to adequately oversee exponential
nanotechnology market growth (Azonano report, 2008). The U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) claims that it regulates ‘products, not technol-
ogies.’ Nevertheless, the FDA expects that many products of nanotechnology
will come under the jurisdiction of many of its centers; thus, the Office of
Combination Products will likely absorb any relevant responsibilities (Tarver,
2007). The FDA regulates a wide range of products, including foods, cos-
metics, drugs, devices, and veterinary products, some of which are produced
utilizing nanotechnology or contain nanomaterials. Acting Commissioner of
the FDA initiated the Nanotechnology Task Force (Task Force) in 2006 to
help address the questions regarding adequacy and application of regulatory
authorities (FDA Nanotechnology Task Force, 2007).
On the other hand, the European Commission aims at reinforcing
nanotechnology and, at the same time, boosting support for collaborative
R&D on the potential impact of nanotechnology on human health and the
environment via toxicological and ecotoxicological studies. The Commis-
sion is performing a regulatory inventory, covering EU regulatory
frameworks that are applicable to nanomaterials (chemicals, worker
protection, environmental legislation, product specific legislation, etc.). The
purpose of this inventory is to examine and, where appropriate, propose
adaptations of EU regulations in relevant sectors (Cordis, 2008).
IV. CONCLUSION
Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the most innovative technologies to
occur in decades and has the potential to improve food quality and safety.
Currently a lot of research has been done on nanotechnology application in
the areas of food packaging, and the detection of pathogens and contami-
nants. Nanotechnology will change the packaging industry by modifying
the structure of packaging materials at the molecular level. As mentioned,
the most beneficial application of nanotechnology is in food packaging.
A self-cleaning coating at the nanoscale and an antimicrobial packaging
coating has already been applied successfully as well as a polymer
nanocomposite for barrier protection. For food manufacturers, using
nanotechnology can mean gaining a more competitive position. While in
the long term, consumers may benefit from advances in nanotechnology as
Nanotechnology and Applications in Food Safety 409
new methods for improving the safety and quality of food products are
developed and applied, the products still need to be regulated to ensure
safety and consumer protection.
REFERENCES
Asadi, G., and Mousavi, M. (2006). Application of nanotechnology in food packaging.Proceedings of 13th IUFoST World Congress 2006. Nantes, France. Website: http://iufost.edpsciences.org
Avella, M., De Vlieger, J.B., Emanuela Errico, M.A., Fischer, S.B., Vacca, C.P., and GraziaVolpe, M.C. (2005). Biodegradable clay nanocomposite films for food packaging ap-plications. Food Chem. 93(3): 467–474.
Azonano report (2008). Federal Agency Officials Meet to Discuss the Regulation ofNanotechnology, Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics, Devices and Biologics. Website: www.azo-nano.com/news.asp?newsID¼5699
Bhunia, A.K., and Lathrop, A. (2003). Foodborne pathogen detection. In: McGraw-HillYearbook of Science & Technology, pp. 320–323. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,New York.
Brody, A.L. (2006). Nano and food packaging technologies converge. Food Technology60(3): 92–94.
Cappello, J. (2000). Overview of Nanotechnology: Risks, Initiatives and Standardization.Website: http://www.asse.org/practicespecialties/articles/nantechArticle.php
Cientifica Report. (2006). Nanotechnologies in the Food Industry. Website: www.cientifica.com/www/details.php?id¼47
Cordis report on safety aspects of nanotechnology. (2008). Available from http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/safety.htm
Datskos, P.G., Thundat, T., and Lavrik, V.N. (2004). Micro and Nanocantilever Sensors.Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Vol. X: 1–10. Website: www.mnl.ornl.gov/Publications/Datskos-2004a.pdf
De Jong, L. (2005). Nanotechnology in action. Intern. Food Ingredients 5: 107–108.Dunn, J. (2004). A mini revolution. Food Manufacture 79(9): 49–50.ElAmin, A. (2005). UK nanotechnology research directed at food industry. Website: http://
www.nutraingredients.com/news/ng.asp?id¼72148ElAmin, A. (2006). Nanocantilevers studied for quick pathogen detection. Website: http://
www.foodproductiondaily.com/news-by-product/news.aspETC Group Report. (2004). Down on the farm: The Impact of nano-scale Technologies
on Food and Agriculture. Website: http://www.etcgroup.org/en/Food Production Daily Report. (2005). Nanotech discovery promises safer food
packaging. Website: http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/news/ng.asp?n¼59980-nanotech-discovery-promises
Goldschmidt, M.C. (2006). The use of biosensor and microarray techniques in the rapiddetection and identification of salmonellae. J. AOAC Intern. 89(2): 530–537.
Hanna, L. (2006). Sensors and sensing – opportunities for the food industry.Food Manufacturing Efficiency (Special theme: Modeling and simulation) 1(1):55–56.
Helmut Kaiser Consultancy. (2005). Study: nanotechnology in food and food processingindustry worldwide. Websites: http://www.hkc22.com/nanofood.html; http://www.who.int/foodsafety/en/; http://www.who.int/foodsafety/chem/en/; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs237/en/
Joseph, T., and Morrison, M. (2006). Nanotechnology in agriculture and food, Institute ofnanotechnology. Website: http://www.nanoforum.org/dateien/temp/nanotechnology%20in%20agriculture%20and%20food.pdf?20032007152346
410 Bita Farhang
Lachance, P.A. (2004). Nutraceutical/drug/anti-terrorism safety assurance through trace-ability. Toxicology Letters (Nutraceutical and functional food industries: aspects on safetyand regulatory requirements) 150(1): 25–27.
Lagaron, J.M. (2006). Higher barriers and better performance. Food Engineer. Ingredients31(2): 50–51.
Mallika, C. (2005). Nano-technology: applications in food industry. Indian Food Industry24(4): 19–21, 31.
Moraru, C.I., Panchapakesan, C., Huang Q., Takhistov, P., Liu S., and Kokini J. (2003).Nanotechnology: A new frontier in food science. Food Technol. 57: 25–27. Website:http://members.ift.org/NR/rdonlyres/5F641E00-290A-4EB0-93D7-C02171FF5D17/0/1203moraru.pdf
Patton, D. (2006). Australian nanotech firm promises better food packaging film. Website:http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/news
Ray, S., Quek, S.Y., Easteal, A., and Chen, X.D. (2006). The potential use of polymer-claynanocomposites in food packaging. Intern. J. Food Engineer. 2(4): 22–25. Website:http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol2/iss4/art5/
Russell, E. (2005). The nuts & bolts of nanoscience. Intern. Food Ingredients 5: 103–105.Sage, L. (2007). Detecting pathogens on produce. Analytical Chemistry 79(1): 7–8.Salamanca-Buentello, F., Persad, D.L., Court, E.B., Martin, D.K., Daar, A.S., and Singer, P.A.
(2005). Nanotechnology and the Developing World. PLoS Med 2(5): e97 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097.
Scott, N., and Chen, H. (2003). Nanoscale science and engineering of agriculture and foodsystems. Report submitted to Cooperative State research, Education and ExtensionService (CSREES), U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Website: http://www.nseafs.cornell.edu
Taver, T. (2007). IFT scientific summery on Food nanotechnology. Website: http://members.ift.org/NR/rdonlyres/E725D811-3620-4CC1-8AAD-40E2BF66CE7E/0/1106Nano.pdf
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Nanotechnology Task Force report. (2007). Website:http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/taskforce/report2007.pdf
Warad, H.C., and Dutta, J. (2006). Nanotechnology for agriculture and food systems–Aview. Asian Institute of nanotechnology. Website: http://www.foresight.org/publica-tions/weekly0026.html
Weiss, Jochen, Takhistov, Paul, and McClements, D. Julian (2006). Functional Materials inFood Nanotechnology. J. Food Sci. 71(9): R107–RR116.