Upload
charity-gaynor
View
234
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Forum V On Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity
2 - 5 April 2007
Sandton Convention Center, Gauteng, South Africa
Sub-theme 2:
Taking stock through monitoring and evaluation
Workshop 3: Evaluating the impact of corruption
Marianne Camerer
Co-founder, International Director
http://www.globalintegrity.org
OutlineOutline
MONITORING AND EVALUATIONMONITORING AND EVALUATIONThe challengeThe challengeA common understanding of corruptionA common understanding of corruptionThe causes and consequences of corruption The causes and consequences of corruption Methods to measure corruptionMethods to measure corruptionMethods to monitor anti-corruptionMethods to monitor anti-corruptionThe 2006 Global Integrity Report and IndexThe 2006 Global Integrity Report and IndexEvaluating anti-corruption reformsEvaluating anti-corruption reformsQuestions to considerQuestions to consider
The ChallengeThe Challenge
Corruption is a universal problem with negative developmental Corruption is a universal problem with negative developmental consequencesconsequences
What do we know about controlling corruption?What do we know about controlling corruption? One of the most significant challenges facing policymakers and One of the most significant challenges facing policymakers and
advocates is how to diagnose and prioritize anti-corruption reforms advocates is how to diagnose and prioritize anti-corruption reforms and interventions and interventions
Difficult decisions must be made on how to spend limited financial Difficult decisions must be made on how to spend limited financial and political capital on reform effortsand political capital on reform efforts
Often, the process has been a “best guess” effort based on Often, the process has been a “best guess” effort based on perceptionsperceptions
A common understanding of A common understanding of CorruptionCorruption
Corruption is the (ab)use or (mis)use of entrusted Corruption is the (ab)use or (mis)use of entrusted public power and the public interest for private public power and the public interest for private gain or interests (World Bank, Transparency gain or interests (World Bank, Transparency International)International)
CCorruption = orruption = MMonopoly onopoly ++ DDiscretion iscretion -- AAccountability (Robert Klitgaard, Controlling ccountability (Robert Klitgaard, Controlling Corruption, 1998)Corruption, 1998)
The causes of corruptionThe causes of corruption
SocialSocial CulturalCultural PoliticalPolitical EconomicEconomic InstitutionalInstitutional IndividualIndividual IdeologicalIdeological
The consequences of corruptionThe consequences of corruption
Negatively impacts investment and growthNegatively impacts investment and growth Creates risk and uncertaintyCreates risk and uncertainty Distorts public expenditure and resource allocationDistorts public expenditure and resource allocation Negatively impacts industrial policies and business Negatively impacts industrial policies and business
developmentdevelopment Undermines democracyUndermines democracy Exacerbates poverty and inequalityExacerbates poverty and inequality Leads to a breakdown in political trustLeads to a breakdown in political trust
Methods to Measure CorruptionMethods to Measure Corruption(Kaufmann, Kraay, Mastruzzi 2006)(Kaufmann, Kraay, Mastruzzi 2006)
Gathering the Gathering the informed informed viewsviews of relevant stakeholders of relevant stakeholders (surveys of firms, public officials, individuals, NGOs, (surveys of firms, public officials, individuals, NGOs, donors, private sector)donors, private sector)
Tracking a countries’ Tracking a countries’ institutional featuresinstitutional features (information on (information on opportunities/incentives for corruption, such as opportunities/incentives for corruption, such as procurement practices, budget transparency etc) procurement practices, budget transparency etc)
Careful and specific Careful and specific audits of specific projectsaudits of specific projects
Methods to monitor anti-Methods to monitor anti-corruptioncorruption
What do we know about controlling corruption?What do we know about controlling corruption? Controlling corruption is about limiting abuses of powerControlling corruption is about limiting abuses of power Controlling corruption is linked to the practices and Controlling corruption is linked to the practices and
institutions that promote democratic governanceinstitutions that promote democratic governance Credible information gathered by local actors according to Credible information gathered by local actors according to
a transparent methodology can assista transparent methodology can assist Monitoring implies a time dimension that can track Monitoring implies a time dimension that can track
changes and adjust interventions accordinglychanges and adjust interventions accordingly
The 2006 The 2006 Global IntegrityGlobal Integrity Report Report Primarily an in-depth diagnostic tool for decision-Primarily an in-depth diagnostic tool for decision-
makersmakers
Country ReportsCountry Reports Country FactsCountry Facts Corruption TimelineCorruption Timeline Reporter’s Notebook Reporter’s Notebook Integrity Indicators (#292 questions)Integrity Indicators (#292 questions) Integrity ScorecardIntegrity Scorecard
Global Integrity IndexGlobal Integrity IndexTransparently quantifies anti-corruption and national integrity
systems by assigning scores to indicatorsPotentially able to benchmark and monitor trends in reform
efforts
An investigative report on anti-corruption mechanisms in 43 countries
2006 Countries (43)
Latin America
Argentina, Brazil, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua
Europe
Bulgaria, Montenegro, Romania, Russia, Serbia
Southeast Asia
Cambodia*, Indonesia, The Philippines, Vietnam
Sub-Saharan Africa
Benin, DRC, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe
Middle East and North Africa
Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, The West Bank*, Yemen
South and Central Asia
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, India, KyrgyzRepublic, Nepal, Pakistan, Tajikistan
North America
USA15 repeated from 2004
The Global Integrity Index:The Global Integrity Index:
The The existenceexistence of institutional mechanisms that prevent of institutional mechanisms that prevent abuses of power (i.e. corruption)abuses of power (i.e. corruption)
The The effectivenesseffectiveness of those anti-corruption mechanisms of those anti-corruption mechanisms
The The accessaccess that citizens have to those mechanisms to that citizens have to those mechanisms to hold public officials accountablehold public officials accountable
Institutions of Governance: Institutions of Governance: 6 key dimensions6 key dimensions23 sub-categories23 sub-categories
292 discrete indicators - clear codebook criteria292 discrete indicators - clear codebook criteria
I. I. Civil Society, Public Information Civil Society, Public Information and Mediaand MediaCivil Society Organizations; Media; Public Civil Society Organizations; Media; Public Access to Information Access to Information
II. II. ElectionsElectionsVoting and Citizen Participation; Election Voting and Citizen Participation; Election Integrity; Political FinancingIntegrity; Political Financing
III. III. Government AccountabilityGovernment AccountabilityExecutive Accountability; Legislative Executive Accountability; Legislative Accountability; Judicial Accountability; Accountability; Judicial Accountability; Budget ProcessBudget Process
IV. IV. Administration and Civil ServiceAdministration and Civil ServiceCivil Service Regulations; Whistle-Blowing Civil Service Regulations; Whistle-Blowing Measures; Procurement; PrivatizationMeasures; Procurement; Privatization
V. V. Oversight and RegulationOversight and RegulationNational Ombudsman; Supreme Audit Institution; National Ombudsman; Supreme Audit Institution; Taxes and Customs; Financial Sector Taxes and Customs; Financial Sector Regulation; Business Licensing and RegulationRegulation; Business Licensing and Regulation
VI. VI. Anti-Corruption and Rule of LawAnti-Corruption and Rule of LawAnti-Corruption Law; Anti-Corruption Agency; Anti-Corruption Law; Anti-Corruption Agency; Rule of Law; Law EnforcementRule of Law; Law Enforcement
Using the Integrity IndicatorsUsing the Integrity Indicators The Integrity Indicators offer a toolkit to policymakers, civil society The Integrity Indicators offer a toolkit to policymakers, civil society
advocates, and private sector actors by identifying strengths and advocates, and private sector actors by identifying strengths and weaknesses in a national governance structure.weaknesses in a national governance structure.
Armed with that insight, decision makers can make more informed Armed with that insight, decision makers can make more informed decisions and address the greatest weaknesses (while supporting decisions and address the greatest weaknesses (while supporting mechanisms that work well) in a system. mechanisms that work well) in a system.
All actors have a common frame of reference and can All actors have a common frame of reference and can track track progressprogress in real-time to gauge effectiveness and ensure reform in real-time to gauge effectiveness and ensure reform efforts remain on track. efforts remain on track.
Evaluating anti-corruption reformsEvaluating anti-corruption reforms
A multi-dimensional national strategy that includes a long term, A multi-dimensional national strategy that includes a long term, structured and sequenced approach to entrench integrity reformsstructured and sequenced approach to entrench integrity reforms
Political commitment to combat corruption wherever it occurs Political commitment to combat corruption wherever it occurs including being subject to scrutinyincluding being subject to scrutiny
Enforcement of comprehensive anti-corruption legislation across Enforcement of comprehensive anti-corruption legislation across the public and private sectorthe public and private sector
Sufficient resources, skills, independence and powers to anti-Sufficient resources, skills, independence and powers to anti-corruption bodiescorruption bodies
Constant review, research and evaluation of areas most prone to Constant review, research and evaluation of areas most prone to corruptioncorruption
A partnership approach that includes all stakeholdersA partnership approach that includes all stakeholders
Questions to considerQuestions to consider How will we know when anti-corruption reforms have been effective How will we know when anti-corruption reforms have been effective
and successful? and successful? – What are the measures of success? What are the measures of success? – In what ways are countries rewarded by effectively addressing corruption?In what ways are countries rewarded by effectively addressing corruption?
Are certain anti-corruption controls more important than others?Are certain anti-corruption controls more important than others? What is the relationship between perception and reality when it What is the relationship between perception and reality when it
comes to monitoring and evaluating anti-corruption reforms?comes to monitoring and evaluating anti-corruption reforms? What about double standards, both internally and externally?What about double standards, both internally and externally?