9
Update: August 2011 Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

  • Upload
    ginny

  • View
    44

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards. Update: August 2011. Overview of Regulation Specifications. * Assumes manufacturers fully use A/C credit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Update: August 2011

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Page 2: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Overview of Regulation Specifications

* Assumes manufacturers fully use A/C credit** Proposed CAFE standard by NHTSA. It is equivalent to 163g/mi plus CO2 credits for using low-GWP A/C refrigerants.“** In April 2010, Canada announced a target of 153 g/km for MY2016. Value in brackets is estimated target for MY2016, assuming that during

2008 and 2016 the fuel efficiency of the LDV fleet in Canada will achieve a 5.5% annual improvement rate (the same as the U.S.). This estimate is used in the accompanying charts.

Page 3: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Historical fleet CO2 emissions performance andcurrent or proposed standards

Page 4: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Historical fleet fuel economy performance andcurrent or proposed standards

Page 5: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Historical fleet fuel consumption performance and current or proposed standards

Page 6: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Total and annual percentage CO2 reduction with enacted and proposed targets

Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate.** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 17% for the MY 2012-2016, and 35% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine 17% and 35% to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.

Page 7: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Total and annual percentage fuel economy improvement with enacted and proposed targets

Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate.** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 15% for the MY 2012-2016, and 46% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine the two values to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.

Page 8: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Four markets absolute and annual rate comparison

8

Page 9: Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Thank you

Washington DC • San Francisco • Brusselswww.theicct.org

+1 202 534 1617www.twitter.com/TheICCT

9