14
Glass Fiber Reinforcement Polymer A Comparison with Traditional Reinforcement Matthew Williams

Glass Fiber Final Project

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Glass Fiber Final Project

Glass Fiber Reinforcement PolymerA Comparison with Traditional Reinforcement

Matthew Williams

Page 2: Glass Fiber Final Project

Motivation

- Structural concentration with an interest in bridge design

- Studied alternative reinforcement in Advanced Concrete Technology

- Steel corrosion is a major infrastructure concern

- Epoxy coating is ineffective and stainless steel is expensive

Page 3: Glass Fiber Final Project

Traditional Steel Reinforcement

Pros- Cheap- Provides ductile failure- Good strength to

weight ratio

Cons- Susceptible to corrosion- Coatings offer little protection- Cause of majority of bridge

repairs- Environmental impacts

Page 4: Glass Fiber Final Project

What Is GFRP- Glass fiber cured in

epoxy resin- Provides superior

strength in the longitudinal direction

- Recommended safety factor of 0.85-0.7 for flexural design

http://www.build-on-prince.com/glass-fiber.html#sthash.9iOUBSVO.dpbs

Page 5: Glass Fiber Final Project

Glass Fiber Reinforcement

Pros- Corrosion resistance- Lightweight- 3 times tensile strength

of steel

Cons- Cost- Glass fibers do react with

concrete - Brittle failure- Availability

Page 6: Glass Fiber Final Project

Comparing Reinforcements- Adam et al. 2015 experimentally tested 10 GFRP

reinforced beams- Compared with FEM analysis- Want to try and replicate displacements that were

achieved.- Nanni 2003 states that serviceability may be more

important than strength.- Additionally, went to run FEM analysis comparing

displacement and stress distributions in FRP vs. Steel.

Page 7: Glass Fiber Final Project

Experimental vs. FEM Method

Page 8: Glass Fiber Final Project

Steel vs. GFRP Method

Page 9: Glass Fiber Final Project

Results

Page 10: Glass Fiber Final Project

Results

Page 11: Glass Fiber Final Project

FEM Stress Distribution

GFRP

Steel

Page 12: Glass Fiber Final Project

Conclusions

- Difficult to replicate experimental results with software

- Proper stress distributions were replicated- Higher neutral axis was achieved- GFRP displacements were greater as

expected

Page 13: Glass Fiber Final Project

Questions?

Page 14: Glass Fiber Final Project

ReferencesAdam, Maher A., et al. "Analytical and experimental flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers bars."Construction and Building Materials 84 (2015): 354-366.

Aguiñiga, F., H. Estrada, and J. I. Cruz. "Effects of Cyclic Loading on Structural Performance of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Elements." Structures Congress 2006@ Structural Engineering and Public Safety. ASCE, 2006.

Karbhari, V. M., et al. "Durability gap analysis for fiber-reinforced polymer composites in civil infrastructure." Journal of Composites for Construction 7.3 (2003): 238-247.

Nanni, Antonio. "North American design guidelines for concrete reinforcement and strengthening using FRP: principles, applications and unresolved issues."Construction and Building Materials 17.6 (2003): 439-446.

Sim, Jongsung, and Cheolwoo Park. "Characteristics of basalt fiber as a strengthening material for concrete structures." Composites Part B: Engineering 36.6 (2005): 504-512.