Upload
marily-m
View
220
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LNG,Market
Citation preview
MARAN GAS MARITIME Inc.
•1
MARAN GAS MARITIME INC
The Perfect Balance of Efficiency and Reliability
Athens ~ June 7, 2011
LNG Market OutlookBy: Richard Gilmore
SIAM CONFERNECE
MARAN GAS MARITIME Inc.
ANGELICOUSSIS SHIPPING GROUP THE FLEET: NO
Operating 32
On Order 16
Sub-Total 48
Operating* 36
On Order 4
Bareboat out 7
Sub-Total 49
Operating 7
On Order 3 LNG/C
Sub-Total 10
TOTAL 105
•DRY CARGO
• avg. age 8.2 years
•TANKERS
• avg. age 6.9 years
•LNG / LPG
• avg. age 3.7 years
• (897,000 cubic meters)
•Fleet as at April 2011•* 15 Tankers are under Management but owned by 3rd party.
Page 1
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 3
LNG Fleet Development
The LNG fleet has expanded rapidly over the last decade – +300% since 2000• The last ten years has seen fleet growth
of 14% (CAGR) but in the next five years growth is expected to slow to ~2% until the end of the decade when growth is expected to increase in support of new projects
• Past growth led by Qatari projects who ordered 45 Q-flex/Q-max vessels between 2004 and 2007 for deliveries between 2007 and 2010
• Ship sizes are not growing over time on a linear basis – current preferences 155,000 – 160,000 cbm
• Propulsion preference has shifted from Steam Turbine to the more efficient D/TFDE systems
• The existing LNG orderbook represents 14% of the overall number of vessels on the water, with 49 vessels on order and 356 currently trading
Historical LNG Fleet Development Historical LNG Fleet Development
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 20140
100
200
300
400
500
600
CBM # of Vessels
14% CAGR
9% CAGR
cbm millions # of vessels
2% CAGR
LNG OrderbookLNG OrderbookLNG Fleet by SizeLNG Fleet by Size
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
<100 122-129 130-139 140-149 150-157 160-170 171-177 Q-Flex Q-Max
# of vessels
Existing (356) To be Delivered (49)
49
14%
0
10
20
30
40
50
LNG0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
# of ships % of Fleet
Source: Poten & Partners
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 4
LNG Demand & Supply
LNG Demand • East of Suez
- Weak industrial demand in major Asian industrial countries (except Japan)- Volatile international commodity prices- Excess volumes being absorbed by Japan, Taiwan, China, India and the
West- Impact of lost Japanese nuclear capacity on LNG markets remains
uncertain, but expect nuclear capacity to remain offline for an extended period
• West of Suez- US unconventional gas supplies are limiting LNG demand- Contracting industrial demand in the US, EU & UK- Price arbitrage between US and Europe determining product deliveries- Availability of storage is a key driver – limited in Europe and Asia
• There is growth, but how best to secure access to it- New markets –Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Middle East- Existing markets – United States, Europe, Asia
LNG Supply• Significant new capacity coming online
- New projects coming on-line include Pluto, PNG, Gorgon, Angola LNG- Gladstone LNG, QCLNG, Donggi Senoro and Prelude have recently taken
FID- Anticipate Wheatstone FID in 2011 and Browse and Pacific LNG FID in
2012- Less certain on West Africa / North Africa project development- A total of 281 MMt/y of LNG supply expected by 2015
• Regionalization of trade is re-emerging with the Middle East acting as the “swing” supplier
• Anticipate tight supply market in 2014 through 2016 as delays effect grassroot developments
• Role and position of Qatar increasing in importance – swing supplier, supplier of last resort, quickest to market
LNG DemandLNG Demand
104 108 110125 132 142
159174 174 183
221242
254266 272 281
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Mill
ion
Tons
of L
NG
LNG SupplyLNG Supply
114 119 122 130 137 147166 172 176 184
222243
256 266 272 281
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Mill
ion
Tons
of L
NG
Source: Poten & Partners
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 5
New LNG Supply Projections
Growing LNG supplies • Current supplies: ~220 Mmtpa
• Anticipated ~110 Mmtpa of new supplies by 2020 originating from:
- Australia
- Nigeria (NLNG 7 and Brass)
- Angola
- Papua New Guinea
Export projects are experiencing slower growth than originally anticipated at the end of last decade: • Shale gas exploitation
• Global recession contracting industrial demand growth
• Lower than expected gas prices in the west
• Inflationary pressure on input / EPC costs
Over 90 vessels will be needed to cover the ship requirements from new projects by 2020
Incremental Supply from Future LNG Projects and Ship RequirementsIncremental Supply from Future LNG Projects and Ship Requirements
Projection of New LNG Supplies, CumulativeProjection of New LNG Supplies, Cumulative
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Mill
ion
Tons
of L
NG
Australia Canada FPSO's Indonesia Papua New Guinea Algeria Angola Egypt Equatorial Guinea Nigeria
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020+
Mill
ion
Tons
of L
NG
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Ship
Req
uire
men
ts (1
65,0
00m
3 eq
uiv.
)New LNG Production - Atlantic
New LNG Production - Pacific
Project Ship Requirement
Source: Poten & Partners
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 6
LNG Trade Route Proliferation
• LNG trade has grown by 7% CAGR since 2000
• A short-term LNG market has developed over the last 10 years
2010 Global LNG Trade Routes2010 Global LNG Trade Routes
1990 Global LNG Trade Routes1990 Global LNG Trade Routes
2000 Global LNG Trade Routes2000 Global LNG Trade Routes
1980 Global LNG Trade Routes1980 Global LNG Trade Routes
100%
Short-term Long-term
100%
Short-term Long-term
2%
98%
Short-term Long-term
Via Peru
21%79%
Short-term Long-term
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 7
Growth in LNG Ships/Terminals/Projects
Year Up to 1979
Up to 1989
Up to 1999
Up to Present
LNG Ships
40 60 106 360
Import Terminals
11 23 36 84
Export Terminals
8 16 25 53
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 8
Regional Trade Flow Affected by Prevailing Global LNG Market
LNG is priced either by reference to oil or to a gas-on-gas market• Liquidity of gas-on-gas markets
enables the establishment of a market price
• Gas-on-gas markets enable trading and diversions
• JCC linked Asian LNG prices are well above liquid market gas prices in the Atlantic Basin
• Recent loss of power generation in Japan has further increased prices in the Far East
Disparity of gas pricing is expected to continue for some time • Additional LNG demand from Japan
will accelerate the tightening of LNG supply markets
• NBP and Henry Hub prices are likely to remain disconnected
• Bearish outlook on US gas pricing with potential increases coming from the growing re-export trade
• South American demand continues to rise
Price Indexations & Factors affecting Long-Term ContractsPrice Indexations & Factors affecting Long-Term Contracts
Henry Hub
NBPOil Product
JCC
Counter-SeasonalPremium
Gas-on-gas market Oil linked market
Equator
Henry Hub
Asia Pacific –usually linked to Japanese Crude Customs prices
(lags a few months)
Price is Crude Oil factor +/- a
constant
Europe –indexation to
either crude or oil products (often based on rolling
averages)
Gas prices determined by gas-on-gas competition
Abundant unconventional
supply
High South American imports
High Middle Eastern imports
High growth in spot
delivered to Europe
Loss of Japanese coal
and nuclear
High demand growth across
Asia
Increased production
Factors increasing prices
Factors decreasing prices
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 9
Nuclear Outages in Japan Result in Higher LNG Requirements
31% of Power Generation capacity in Japan’s Eastern region is currently shut down
Outages at Japanese Nuclear facilities will result in additional LNG import requirements• ~11 MMt/y in 2011
• Japan’s LNG demand will reach 77.8 MMt/y in 2011
Japan’s LNG demand growth in the medium to long-term is driven by the expected absence of any additions in nuclear capacity and a drive towards gas in the power sector
Japan’s LNG future remains uncertain• Market participants are now having to re-evaluate
both near term and long term strategies• Thus far limited if any effect in the shipping market
as a result of recent events
Japan, Eastern Region, Total Power Generation Capacity Before and After EarthquakeJapan, Eastern Region, Total Power Generation Capacity Before and After Earthquake
Japan, Eastern Region, Electricity Production by Fuel TypeJapan, Eastern Region, Electricity Production by Fuel Type
0102030405060708090
100
Before After
OtherInterconnectionsHydroOilGas (Boiler)Gas (CCGT)CoalNuclear
GW
44%
19%
30%
1%5%1%
67%
5%
9%
4%6%9%
Gas
Coal
Nuclear
Imports
Hydro
Oil
Before March 10, 2011 After March 12, 2011
Source: Poten & Partners
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 10
Unconventional Gas is having an Impact
North American Unconventional Gas (UG) maintain significant downward pressure on Henry Hub prices
Coal Bed Methane (CBM) for LNG export in Australia and Indonesia
In the long term increasing UG availability could impact LNG demand in areas such as China, India and Europe
Impact of Unconventional Gas per RegionImpact of Unconventional Gas per Region
Source: Poten & Partners
Canada (Shale Gas)Current LNG application at Kitimat, planned mid-decade start-up
USA (Shale Gas)Setting market clearing Henry Hub price
Australia (CBM)Imminent application as feed gas to LNG
Indonesia (CBM)Imminent application as feed gas to LNG
China (Shale Gas)Additional domestic production Post 2020
Europe (UG)Additional domestic production Post 2020
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 11
Shale Gas Economics are Driving North American Price Levels
US Gas market is not resource-constrained for the foreseeable future US is now the world’s largest gas producer Unconventional gas has gone from ~15% of US production
in 1990 to more than 50% in 2008 Long term Henry Hub projections are around $5 / MMBtu
North American Shale Gas Cost of Service (i.e., breakeven cost)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$/MMB
tu
2010 Monthly HH Prices
Max: $5.25/MMBtu
Avg: $4.24/MMBtu
Min: $3.35/MMBtu
Woo
dford
Horn
Rive
r
Marce
llus
(new
tax)
Hayn
esvil
le(T
exas
)
Faye
ttevil
le
Barn
ett
Hayn
esvil
le(L
ouisi
ana)
Marce
llus
North American Shale Gas Cost of Service (i.e., breakeven cost)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$/MMB
tu
2010 Monthly HH Prices
Max: $5.25/MMBtu
Avg: $4.24/MMBtu
Min: $3.35/MMBtu
Woo
dford
Horn
Rive
r
Marce
llus
(new
tax)
Hayn
esvil
le(T
exas
)
Faye
ttevil
le
Barn
ett
Hayn
esvil
le(L
ouisi
ana)
Marce
llus
Source: Poten & Partners
MONTH 2009© POTEN & PARTNERSJune 2011 Page 12
Shale Gas Economics are Driving North American Price Levels
US Gas market is not resource-constrained for the foreseeable future US is now the world’s largest gas producer Unconventional gas has gone from ~15% of US production
in 1990 to more than 50% in 2008 Long term Henry Hub projections are around $5 / MMBtu
North American Shale Gas Cost of Service (i.e., breakeven cost)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$/MMB
tu
2010 Monthly HH Prices
Max: $5.25/MMBtu
Avg: $4.24/MMBtu
Min: $3.35/MMBtu
Woo
dford
Horn
Rive
r
Marce
llus
(new
tax)
Hayn
esvil
le(T
exas
)
Faye
ttevil
le
Barn
ett
Hayn
esvil
le(L
ouisi
ana)
Marce
llus
North American Shale Gas Cost of Service (i.e., breakeven cost)
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$/MMB
tu
2010 Monthly HH Prices
Max: $5.25/MMBtu
Avg: $4.24/MMBtu
Min: $3.35/MMBtu
Woo
dford
Horn
Rive
r
Marce
llus
(new
tax)
Hayn
esvil
le(T
exas
)
Faye
ttevil
le
Barn
ett
Hayn
esvil
le(L
ouisi
ana)
Marce
llus
Source: Poten & Partners
Thank you!