Upload
wilfred-peters
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gewessler, Hörl, Wolkinger
Course: Energy and Sustainable Course: Energy and Sustainable DevelopmentDevelopment
• Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, GDP and Population ↑
• potential of being self-sufficient in primary energy
• 74% fossil, 26% renewable but huge differences among countries
Energy consumption in Latin Energy consumption in Latin America:America:
Policy and Public awareness:Policy and Public awareness:
• Resource Nationalism
• Unstable political regimes → conflicts
• Public awareness very low but many projects and efforts are under way
• Income inequality
Renewable Energy Share in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2007
• Interconnections between countries planned, ongoing projects
• 2003: harmonization Columbia and Ecuador
• Different power frequencies in North and South (interconnections difficult)
• Investment in energy supply infrastructure might be too low according to a report by the Deutsche Bank (2007)
Power Grid Network Structure in Latin America
• High potential – Sun Belt Region
• Few installations yet
• First solar energy park planned in Argentina with a maximum installed potential of 1.2 megawatts
World Map: Amount of Insolation
• potential for wind power is
extraordinarily high• Brazil: 140 GW• Central America/Caribbean:
100GW• Mexico: 40 GW
• wind parks planned or under construction
• Capacity will rise up to 46 GW by 2025
• Brazil’s market size will reach ca. 70% of total installed capacity in LA
Latin American Wind Potential per Country
Wind Energy Production Capacity for Latin
America 1997-2009
• 2007: 660.424 Billion Kilowatt-hours by Hydro Power Plants
• Brazil: 96% of electricity by hydropower (world leader in hydroelectric plants)
• many multi-scale facilities
• potential for small hydroelectric technologies
• high rainfall indices small hydroelectric technologies interesting for remote areas
Itaipu dam Brazil
• Instead of burning, it is possible to use plants as a carbon sink
• store energy in a simply and cost effective way
• trees provide a natural source of energy and additionally carbon-free building materials
• growing biomass is a cheaper and more sustainable energy source than fossil fuels
Currently used biomass energy technologies (CBETs) negative effects:
• low thermal efficiency• significant emissions• leads to respiratory and heart ailments, tuberculosis and blindness• emissions of long-lived (CH4) and short-lived (CO)• significant greenhouse effects• leads to warming of the lower atmosphere• influence water budgets on a regional scale
Advanced biomass energy technologies (ABETs) positive effects:
• deliver higher thermal efficiencies• lower emissions of pollutants• energy savings• co-benefits to health effects• climate change mitigation• assess the barriers to their widespread diffusion
• billion of men, woman and children are forced to live in absolute poverty
• current strategic energy models provide mega cities with energy but not local rural areas
• balance interests between economic growth and the supply of local energy services for poverty reduction