Upload
orpah
View
45
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Geoscience Professionalism and Ethics. University of Calgary Department of Geoscience – March 17, 2009. Unlock your potential. Best profession Solid foundation Opens many doors technical & non-technical national & international My background. Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Geoscience Professionalism and EthicsUniversity of Calgary Department of Geoscience – March 17, 2009
Unlock your potential
Best profession
Solid foundation
Opens many doors technical & non-technical national & international
My background
Objectives
Recognize the ethical obligations of professional licensing
Outline the scope and purpose behind the Code of Ethics (as upheld by APEGGA)
Illustrate how the fundamental principles of ethical conduct may be interpreted and applied
3U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
APEGGA Membership
APEGGA is the second largest self-governing association in Alberta and the third largest Engineering & Geoscience association in Canada.
All Members 1990 - 2008
25000
27500
30000
32500
35000
37500
40000
42500
45000
47500
50000
52500
55000
57500
60000
62500
65000
0-Ja
n-00
4-Nov
-06
8-Sep
-13
13-J
ul-20
18-M
ay-2
7
22-M
ar-3
4
24-J
an-41
29-N
ov-4
7
3-Oct
-54
7-Aug
-61
11-J
un-68
16-A
pr-7
5
18-F
eb-8
2
23-D
ec-8
8
28-O
ct-95
1-Sep
-02
6-Ju
l-09
10-M
ay-1
6
15-M
ar-2
3
Year
# o
f M
emb
ers
Outline
Objectives
Professionalism
What makes Professional Practice different?
Rock Solid Professionalism
Self Governance
Geoscience Professional Ethics
The APEGGA Code of Ethics
The APEGGA Rules of Conduct
A few case histories
5U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
What is APEGGA?
The Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
The body given responsibility to regulate the professions
Your Professional Association
Mandatory membership/licensure
Not a Technical Society
ASAP: APEGGA Student Advantage Program
APEGGA’s Authority
The Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Professions Act
•Privilege of self-governance
•Right to title
•Exclusive scope of practice
•Defines practice
•APEGGA’s role
•Governance
Professionalism
Advanced/specialized knowledge
Intensive study and preparation
Continued professional development
Good judgment
High standards
Leadership
Ethical conduct
Duty to protect the public interest
8U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Rock Solid Professionalism
9U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
What makes Professional Practice Different?
Skilled Practice Education, preparation, knowledge,
skill and continued study
Ethical Conduct Code of Ethics, a set of shared
values and personal integrity
Duty to the Public Obligation, trust and respect
10U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Self Governance
A profession also accepts responsibility to regulate its members and services
In Alberta, this task falls to APEGGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta)
Changes to the Act
“All members shall recognize that professional conduct is founded upon integrity,
competence, dignity and devotion.” 11U of A Geoscience March 10,
2009
Questions?
Geoscience and Professional Ethics
The word “ethics” comes from the Greek word “ethos”
The study of standards of right and wrong
Deals with moral conduct, duty and judgment: the relationships between people
Deals with the moral implications of the options available to an informed individual
Signifies a shared commitment to strive for excellence
13U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
The APEGGA Code of Ethics
The purpose of the Code of Ethics is:
To outline principles of professionalism
To distinguish appropriate conduct
To provide a vision of service to society
14U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
The APEGGA Rules of Conduct
Professional engineers, geologists and geophysicists shall:
1. In their areas of practice, hold paramount the health, safety and welfare of the public, and have regard for the environment.
2. Undertake only work that they are competent to perform by virtue of their training and experience.
3. Conduct themselves with integrity, honesty, fairness and objectivity in their professional activities.
4. Comply with applicable statutes, regulations and bylaws in their professional practices.
5. Uphold and enhance the honour, dignity and reputation of their professions, and thus, the ability of the professions to serve the public interest.
15U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Professional Service
1. The public
2. His or her practice (employer or clients)
3. Others (peers, third parties and the professional association)
4. The law
5. The profession
The Code defines five groups that professionals must serve:
16U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Questions?
Rule 1: Health, Safety and Welfare of the Public
“Holding paramount . . .” Takes precedence over all other
considerations
Safe workplaces and projects
The Alberta Occupational Health and Safety Act, Regulations and Code
“Lead by example”
“Considering the public interest”
18U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Case History #1
Stan Dard, P.Eng., was responsible for supervising the perforating procedures for the well casing opposite a potential gas-producing zone. There was no fluid within the casing. Therefore, after perforation, the flow of natural gas would not be contained by the hydrostatic pressure of fluid within the producing formation.
Kim Berlite, P.Geol., who was familiar with operations at the well site and knew that the well could produce significant volumes of gas at a high formation pressure, had correctly selected the depth intervals at which the casing was to be perforated.
The perforating company, acting under the supervision of Mr. Dard, proceeded to perforate the dry casing. The perforating tools and cable were blown from the well by a significant, uncontrolled flow of high-pressure gas. A nearly unmanageable amount of natural gas flowed from the well, creating hazards to equipment and placing several lives at risk.
Fortunately, the well was brought under control and capped without injury to the workers. This might not have been accomplished under other circumstances — for example, if the gas flow had been greater, or if the gas had contained hydrogen sulphide. 19U of A Geoscience March 10,
2009
Case History #1: Discussion
Rule 1 of the Code was clearly violated
Failure in communication between two technical professionals endangered the lives of fellow workers
Kim failed to caution Stan about the high gas zone; Stan should have consulted Kim before deciding on perforating procedures
Could have caused significant economic loss and damage to the environment
20U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Rule 2: Competence and Knowledge
Scope of responsibility
Presentation of qualifications
Expressing opinions and engaging experts
Stamping and signing documents
Continuing professional competence
21U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Case History #2
A geophysical consulting company, LMN Geophysical Inc., was awarded an assignment to design a drilling program, interpret data, evaluate the potential of the field, and prepare a report for use by a client to raise capital from the public. The company president, Cy Smick, P.Geoph., assumed both corporate and professional responsibility for the professional practice of the company. He maintained custody of the permit stamp and only he was authorized to affix and sign it before completed documents were issued.
The assignment came at a time when the company was extremely busy, Mr. Smick assigned Dee S. Covery, P.Geoph., to direct and control the project. However, she was not able to devote as much attention to the assignment as she believed was needed to provide an adequate level of professional direction.
When it was completed, Ms. Covery discussed the report with Mr. Smick. Although she believed that the project staff had performed their respective duties responsibly and well, Ms. Covery expressed concern that she had not been able to properly supervise the work. She explained that for this reason she had not affixed her professional stamp to the final report. The president accepted this explanation and, without further review, affixed and signed LMN's permit stamp to the report and mailed it to the client.
The report was accepted and used to develop a prospectus for distribution to potential investors. Several years later, an error was discovered in the report, which had the effect of overstating the investment potential by a factor of three.
The client sued LMN and named Smick and Covery in the lawsuit. One of the investors complained to APEGGA. 22U of A Geoscience March 10,
2009
Case History #2: Discussion
Who should bear the major responsibility - LMN’s president or the geophysicist?
Mr. Smick - neglected to review Ms. Covery’s workload and neglected to review report himself
Ms. Covery could have handled the situation better (should have informed Mr. Smick that she would be unable to provide suitable supervision)
23U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Rule 3: Integrity, Honesty, Fairness and Objectivity
Acting fairly
Expressing opinions in public
Maintaining confidentiality
Conflict of interest
Having recommendations overruled
24U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Case History #3
Aurest Corporation has been advised by a pollution-control agency that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into an adjacent lake. The agency has also advised Aurest of the minimum standard that must be met.
In an effort to convince the agency that the lake will still meet established environmental standards after receiving the manufacturing wastes, the corporation employs Rick Titude, P.Eng., to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report.
After completion of his studies, but before completion of any written report, Rick concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the lake below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly. Rick orally advises Aurest Corporation of his findings. Subsequently, the corporation terminates Rick’s contract with full payment for his services performed and instructs him not to render a written report to the corporation.
Thereafter, Rick learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that Aurest has presented information to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
25U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Case History #3: Discussion
Does Rick have an ethical obligation to report his findings?
Should first consider obligations to the public
How should he go about reporting these findings? Should have rendered a written report
Should find a way to see that his findings are considered at the hearing
Does he have any obligations to notify Aurest? Should contact to clarify whether his findings have been included
or not
Explain that he has a professional obligation to advise the regulatory agency
26U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Rule 4: Statutes, Regulations and Bylaws
Due Diligence
Being aware of the law Federal, provincial and municipal
Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Professions Act and its regulations
Responsible environmental management
Making clients and employers aware of the law
27U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Rule 5: Honour, Dignity and Reputation
Advertising and presentations
Conduct toward other professionals
Reviewing work of other professionals
Supervising members-in-training
Personal behaviour and conduct
Discrimination and human rights
28U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Summary
Professionals are no better than anyone else, just better prepared
Professionals are supported by the twin pillars of ethical behaviour and skilled, knowledgeable practice
APEGGA is its members: it is a self-governing entity and enforces its own act, the Alberta Engineering, Geological and Geophysical Professions Act
Geoscientists hold to the same code of ethics as Engineers, but have a greater responsibility for the environment
29U of A Geoscience March 10, 2009
Questions?