10
“To bleed or not to bleed” Developing Individualized Treatment Plans for Adult Patients with Hemophilia 1 Adult Hemophilia Program of BC, St. Paul’s Hospital Sandra Squire Physiotherapist Dr. Shannon Jackson Medical Director Kam McIntosh Clinical Nurse Educator Claude Bartholomew Social Worker Dr. Pat Camp Research Mentor Deb Gue, Clinical Nurse Specialist Dr. Paul Yenson, Hematologist

Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

  • Upload
    bcpsqc

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

“To bleed or not to bleed”

Developing Individualized Treatment Plans for Adult Patients with Hemophilia

1

Adult Hemophilia Program of BC, St. Paul’s Hospital

Sandra Squire PhysiotherapistDr. Shannon Jackson Medical DirectorKam McIntosh Clinical Nurse EducatorClaude Bartholomew Social WorkerDr. Pat Camp Research MentorDeb Gue, Clinical Nurse SpecialistDr. Paul Yenson, Hematologist

Page 2: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Background

• Inherited

• Mostly Men

• They bleed !– Pre 1950’s -> lived until 20’s– 1980-1990’s -> tainted blood– Now -> safe treatment– Intravenous self-infusion

2

Page 3: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

What do we mean by "bleeds”?

Knee Joint

Page 4: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Comprehensive Care

• Since 1972 in BC• Strong interdisciplinary collaboration

– Since 2004 at Providence Health (St. Paul’s)– Support self-treatment at home

Engagement with patients

Home infusion record base

Preventative > Reactive Philosophy

2004

Now Individualization

Page 5: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Realization

• Improvement from before but still bleeding• Can we do better?

– To bleed or not to bleed • PHC Research Challenge 2012• Supporting novice interdisciplinary research

Page 6: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Prospective observational study

1. Baseline bleeding frequency on current prophylaxis

2. Shared decision making -> new treatment plan**Often from 2-3 times per week to DAILY injections**Lowering doseMeasuring lowest level in patients blood

3. Follow up measures 4 and 12 months after:-bleeding frequency-amount of factor infused-physical activity-quality of life

6

** PHC Research Challenge **

Page 7: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Results – Joint bleeds

• 12 patients @ 4 months– 75% ZERO bleeds

• 12 patients added

• Now 24 patients– Sustained results – ? Improving w/ time

Page 8: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Other outcomes

• Physical activity– 90% measured as sedentary at baseline and 4 months

• Quality of life– No change at 4 months

• Factor utilization– Amount prescribed– Overall consumption ( 29%– Consumption to treat bleeds 50%

Page 9: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

Reflection

• Patient involvement– Control of day to day lives– Adaptability– Working relationship with team

• Foundation of communication and trust

Page 10: Georgia a. c6. to bleed or not to bleed. sandra squire et al

What now?

• Continue!• Acknowledge

– Our patients

• Knowledge translation – Video…