24
George Tillinghast, Rebecca Stein, Mike Surian Tom Dinetta, Jon Richardson

George Tillinghast, Rebecca Stein, Mike Suriani Tom Dinetta, Jon Richardson

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

George Tillinghast, Rebecca Stein, Mike Suriani

Tom Dinetta, Jon Richardson

BattleBots- The Legacy

• BattleBots IQ competition April 2007• Integrate engineering knowledge and

creativity• Contact: Nola Garcia

– BattleBots IQ Program Director

Design Problem:

• To create a battling robot that is both highly maneuverable and formidable in combat.

• Bot can withstand damage and immobilize opponent

Design Requirements:

• Must meet all safety requirements • Must weigh between 60lbs and 120lbs• Must be mobile and remotely controlled• Must protect itself• Must be capable of inflicting damage

Design Wants:

• Invertible

• Tank drive

• Low center of gravity

• Multiple weapons

• Electric motors

Possible Solutions:

Solution Research: Weapon

Wedge Hammer Saw

Spinner Rammer

Solution Research: Drive Element

• Tank drive-Maximum mobility, ultimate simplicity

-Utilizes two separate motors for turning

• Walking -Consume large amounts of power

-Easy to Damage

Solution Research: Electronics

• Motors-Voltage, power, weight, price

• Speed Controllers-Range of speeds, tolerance, durability-Popular brands: IFI Robotics, Vantec, 4DQ

• Radio Controllers-One link for each: motor, weapon, on-off switch

Preliminary Design

+ =

Inverted Wedge Flipping Robot:

-Armor

-Flipping Arm

-Drive Train

-Electronics

Design: Armor

• Materials– Titanium Alloy (Exterior)

• Withstand largest load, smallest weight• Difficult to machine

– Aluminum (Interior) • Protected by Titanium• Lightweight, easy to machine

• Design– Invertible Parallelogram– Ultimate Defense

Design: Lifting Arm• Purpose

– Dynamic offensive weapon– Lift and toss an enemy

• Design– Moves in arc motion– Flush with body

• Advantages– High offensive damage – “Unlimited” firing cycles

Lifting Arm – Power• Linear Actuators

– Background• Small power screw• Limited only by battery

– Requirements• High load capacity• Reasonable speed

– Cost• Around $100

Lifting Arm - Considerations

• Engineering analysis– Dynamic analysis

• Define motion of arm• Identify necessary

dimensions

– Stress analysis • Identify points of high

stress• Choose appropriate

material

Design: Drive Train

• Tank drive– Maximum mobility – Achieve 4 wheel drive

• Bi-axial support– Wheel protection– Additional support

• Invertible

Drive Train - Components• Motors

– Range in power• 3hp to 9hp• 2000rpm to 5000rpm

– Requires speed reduction• Chain and sprocket

– High efficiency– Low cost– Easy to configure

• Minimal precision required

Design: Electronics• Wireless communication between Operator and Bot• Converts user commands into motor operations• Senses Bot hardware failure• Controls the Bot’s Primary weaponry

Electronics: System Overview

3

32

5

1

4

Electronics: Central Control Unit

• Microchip PIC18F8520• Code written in C or

assembly language• Dual control unit:

– Basic Hardware Functionality

– Specialized Hardware Functionality

Electronics: Communications and Speed Control

• RS-422 Modems– 900 MHz frequency channel– 5 standard channels and 35

“competition” channels

• Victor 884 Speed Controller– Controls Bot motor functions– Can output 3%-100% of the

input power

Design Schedule and

Cost Analysis

Design Schedule

Cost Analysis

Shell/Body $1,669.00

Lifting Arm $459.00

Drive Train $1,283.00

Electronics $729.24

Total $4,140.00

Conclusion

• Design approach will yield a competitive robot

-Impenetrable titanium shell

-Deadly lifting arm

-Invertible wedge defense

-Maneuverability and accuracy