1
COUNTY ATLAS SERIES ATLAS C–11, PART B, PLATE 7 OF 10 Bedrock Hydrogeology STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATERS GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF MOWER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Dclp Digital base map composite: Roads and county boundaries—Minnesota Department of Transportation GIS Statewide Base Map (source scale 1:24,000) Hydrologic features—U.S. Geological Survey Digital Line Graphs (source scale 1:100,000) Digital base map annotation—Minnesota Geological Survey. Project data compiled from 1997 to 2001 at the scale of 1:100,000. Universal Transverse Mercator projection, grid zone 15, 1983 North American datum. Vertical datum is mean sea level. GIS data and metadata available through the DNR Waters website: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters BEDROCK HYDROGEOLOGY By Moira Campion 2002 MAP EXPLANATION Well Label If shown, ground-water age in years, estimated by carbon-14 30,000 Map Symbols TM This information is available in an alternative format on request. This map was compiled and generated using geographic information systems (GIS) technology. Digital data products are available from DNR Waters. This map was prepared from publicly available information only. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the factual data on which this map interpretation is based. However, the Department of Natural Resources does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or any implied uses of these data. Users may wish to verify critical information; sources include both the references here and information on file in the offices of the Minnesota Geological Survey and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Every effort has been made to ensure the interpretation shown conforms to sound geologic and cartographic principles. This map should not be used to establish legal title, boundaries, or locations of improvements. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. The DNR Information Center Twin Cities: (651) 296-6157 Minnesota Toll Free: 1-888-646-6367 Telecommunication Device for the Hearing Impaired (TDD): (651) 296-5484 TDD Minnesota Toll Free: 1-800-657-3929 DNR Web Site: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us ©2002 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, and the Regents of the University of Minnesota U.S. 63 Waltham Brownsdale Racine Lansing Maple View I-90 Grand Meadow U.S. 218 Elkton Adams U.S. 218 Lyle Le Roy Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Elevation (feet above sea level) Cedar River Cedar River Cedar River ( ) Cedar River ( ) Cedar River ( ) Cedar River I-90 Robinson Creek ( ) Dexter Root River Rose Creek Roberts Creek ( ) Upper Iowa River ( ) Austin I-90 Dubuque Formation Upper Cedar Valley aquifer Lower Cedar Valley aquifer Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer Galena Group aquifer Chickasaw shale Potentiometric contour of aquifers in feet above mean sea level—Contour interval is 20 feet. Dashed where contour is uncertain. Arrow indicates general direction of ground- water movement. Upper Cedar Valley Spillville-Maquoketa Lower Cedar Valley Upper Cedar Valley Lower Cedar Valley Spillville-Maquoketa Wells measured for static water level Dcvu Dcvl Dsom Ogal Greater than 75 feet of till cover CROSS-SECTION EXPLANATION Recent—Water entered the ground since 1953 (10 or more tritium units). Well screen color shows recent water. Mixed—Water is a mixture of recent and vintage waters (0.8 to less than 10 tritium units). Well screen color shows mixed water. Vintage—Water entered the ground before 1953 (less than 0.8 tritium units). Well screen color shows vintage water. Upper Cedar Valley aquifer Sand and gravel deposits Undifferentiated till Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer Lower Cedar Valley aquifer Dubuque Formation Chickasaw shale Galena Group aquifer St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood map unit* Very old—Water with carbon-14 age greater than 10,000 years before present. Well screen color shows vintage water. In feet above mean sea level. Contour interval is 20 feet. Arrow indicates general direction of ground- water movement If shown, ground-water age in years, estimated by carbon-14 Vintage water shallower than mixed water SV 18,000 Spring associated with stream Ground-water flow into the cross section Ground-water flow out of the cross section Odub Dclc LOCATION DIAGRAM Upper Cedar Valley Spillville-Maquoketa Lower Cedar Valley *The Decorah Shale and Glenwood Formation both act as confining units, but the intervening Platteville Formation is a thin aquifer. Combined, these units are treated as a confining unit. 28,000 9000 6 5 7 3 90 90 218 5 6 56 2 1 20 7 63 4 90 20 6 218 2 3 4 11 14 1 8 8 7 5 7 7 1 105 56 14 16 3 3 4 56 7 105 5 56 16 16 16 16 56 T 102 N T 104 N R 18 W R 17 W R 16 W R 15 W R 14 W T 101 N T 103 N R 14 W R 15 W R 16 W R 17 W R 18 W T 104 N T 103 N T 102 N T 101 N 92°45' 93°00' 43°45' 43°30' 43°45' 43°30' 92°30' 92°45' 93°00' 92°30' Racine Meadow Grand Le Roy Taopi Adams Creek Rose Austin Maple View Brownsdale Waltham Dexter Elkton Lyle Lansing Varco Sargeant UDOLPHO WALTHAM SARGEANT PLEASANT VALLEY RACINE FRANKFORD GRAND MEADOW DEXTER AUSTIN WINDOM LE ROY LODI NEVADA LYLE CLAYTON RED ROCK LANSING MARSHALL BENNINGTON C e d a r R i ve r Mill Pond Ramsey W olf C re ek D o b bins C r e e k M ur phy Creek O rc h a r d C r e e k W o o d b u ry C reek C e dar R iv e r R o s e C reek O tter C r e ek Little Cedar R iver Up p er Iowa R iver L i t t le I o w a R iv er N o r t h B r anch U p p e r I o w a Ri ver South Branch Root R iv er D eer C re ek Deer Cre ek So ut h F o rk B e ar C reek N o r t h Creek Bear Fork C r e ek R o b i n son C r e ek North B r a n ch R o ot R iv er R o berts Creek C a r e y 1 6 31 36 1 36 6 1 6 31 36 31 1 6 6 1 36 31 1 36 6 31 36 31 1 6 1 6 31 36 31 36 1 6 1 6 31 36 31 36 1 6 31 1 36 6 31 1 31 36 31 6 31 6 1 36 6 31 1 31 36 36 36 36 31 31 1 6 1 36 6 1 31 6 Upper Cedar Valley Spillville-Maquoketa Lower Cedar Valley 1200 1200 1200 SV SV SV SV SV Characterization of Bedrock Hydrogeology This plate displays the Mower County aquifer system in map and cross-section views. This presentation provides practical information about the hydrogeology in the county, which is crucial to understanding ground-water supply and management issues. The information also was essential to the development of the pollution sensitivity map on Plate 9. Concepts that require more detailed explanation are discussed on Plate 8 and in the Technical Appendix. The interpretation of the bedrock hydrogeology was modified from a historical one-aquifer system to a sequence of several aquifers and confining units. This approach has been used by hydrogeologists in Iowa and Minnesota (see Plate 2, Part A). The presence of regional shale confining units provides protection from surface contamination in areas with limited, low-permeability glacial cover. Mapping the shallow confining units at a countywide scale provides an opportunity to avoid drilling unnecessarily deep wells for drinking water supply. Regulators who know the location of the regional shale units can target aquifers that may be hydrologically protected from surface contamination. This can reduce drilling costs for municipalities and residents who depend on ground water for drinking water, irrigation, and industry. The bedrock aquifers, confining units, and major mapped faults in the county are shown on the map, and a pattern overlies the area where till thickness is greater than 75 feet. Cretaceous deposits are thin and discontinuous; they are not shown on the map or cross sections. The potentiometric surfaces for the three uppermost aquifers are shown with 20-foot contours of different colors, as well as the locations of wells used to develop the potentiometric contours. The locations of wells sampled for geochemistry and for residence time information from tritium and carbon-14 age dating are also displayed. The cross sections show the arrangement of aquifers and confining units at depth and colored residence time interpretations based on the age- dating results from the sampled wells. All sampled wells have been projected onto the closest cross section. No well is more than 2 miles from a cross section. See Plate 8 for a description of radiometric dating of ground water. The map shows potentiometric contours of the Upper Cedar Valley, Lower Cedar Valley, and Spillville-Maquoketa aquifers. The small data points showing the well locations used to develop these surfaces are displayed in colors corresponding to the contours. There are few locations where wells from shallower and deeper aquifers are close enough to one another to be used as nests for a point-by-point comparison of water-level information from different aquifers. Enough data points exist, however, to show that the potentiometric surface of each aquifer is different. The potentiometric differences between the Upper Cedar Valley and the Lower Cedar Valley aquifers are subtle in the southeastern part of the county. Greater differences appear in the center of cross-section E–E. The difference between the potentiometric surfaces of the Lower Cedar Valley and the Spillville-Maquoketa is most obvious in the center of the map and in the center of cross-section C–C. Generally, ground water flows from east-central Mower County to the south and west in the Upper and Lower Cedar Valley aquifers. In the northeast, ground water in the Spillville- Maquoketa aquifer flows from the center of the county to the north. In the northwest, ground water in the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer flows south through potentiometric troughs toward the Cedar River discharge area. Generally, potentiometric differences are smallest at the Cedar and Little Iowa rivers, which are regional discharge areas. Recent ground water was found in samples from 12 wells based on tritium dating. Nine of the wells with samples of recent water have till cover less than 75 feet thick. For most of the central and northeastern parts of the county, ground water gets progressively older with depth. This is a typical way for water to infiltrate from the land surface into the bedrock aquifers. However, there are areas shown on cross- sections A–Aand C–Cwhere samples of vintage waters were found shallower than the samples of mixed waters in deeper nearby wells. In southwest and southeast Mower County, the distribution of recent, mixed, and vintage samples on the cross sections is different from the rest of the county. Recent and mixed waters are found at great depths. Recent and mixed waters found at depth indicate focused recharge. Faulting and sinkholes are also found in the western portion of C–Cand D–Dand the eastern portion of E–Eand F–F. The presence of faulting and karst features may be a factor in focused recharge. These residence time patterns are discussed in more detail on Plate 8. Mower County has an abundant supply of high-quality drinking water in the bedrock aquifers found throughout the county. Ground water in the two uppermost bedrock aquifers flows from the east-central part of the county to the south and west. In the northeast, ground water in the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer flows from the center of the county generally to the north. Results of age dating show that till thicker than 75 feet can restrict infiltration from the land surface to the bedrock aquifers. The faults and karst features in the west and southeast may contribute to the focused recharge of the bedrock aquifers from the land surface. REFERENCES CITED Green, J. A., Mossler, J. H., Alexander, S. C., and Alexander, E. C., Jr., 1997, Karst hydrogeology of Le Roy Township, Mower County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-2, 2 pls., scale 1:24,000. Libra, R. D., and Hallberg, G. R., 1985, Hydrogeologic observations from multiple core holes and piezometers in the Devonian carbonate aquifers in Floyd and Mitchell counties, Iowa: Iowa Geological Survey Open File Report 85-2, Part 1, p. 1–19. 1200 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 1200 1100 1000 900 1300 1100 1000 900 800 700 1300 1200 1100 1000 1300 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 1200 1100 1000 700 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1000 1100 1200 1300 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 600 800 18,000 16,000 6000 2500 6000 7500 9000 35,000 6000 9000 7500 10,000 8000 43,000 28,000 3000 7500 10,000 Tritium units: 1 Casing depth: 695 feet Depth completed: 911 feet 2500 16,000 18,000 7500 6000 9000 35,000 3000 6000 8000 43,000 Tritium units: less than 0.8 Casing depth: 930 feet Depth completed: 1035 feet 6000 A B C D E F ABCDEFA B C D E F FEDCBAUppermost Bedrock Aquifers and Confining Units Potentiometric Contour 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES SCALE 1:100 000 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KILOMETERS Aquifer or confining unit Symbol Well Symbols Shape indicates aquifer type Spillville-Maquoketa Upper Cedar Valley Lower Cedar Valley St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan Galena Group Color indicates tritium age Recent—Waters with tritium concentrations of 10 tritium units (TU) or more entered the ground water since 1953. Mixed—Waters with 0.8 to 10 TU are a mixture of recent and vintage. Quaternary Fault line Spring Vintage—Waters with less than 0.8 TU entered the ground water before 1953. MULTIAQUIFER SYSTEM IN DEVONIAN AND UPPER ORDOVICIAN BEDROCK IN MOWER COUNTY Most of the previous hydrogeologic studies in Mower County describe a single, thick bedrock aquifer underlying the county. This study presents the Devonian and upper Ordovician bedrock as a sequence of carbonate aquifers separated by shale units. Hydrogeologists in Iowa (Libra and Hallberg, 1985) first classified the rocks as regionally extensive carbonate and shale units that compose a regional system of aquifers and confining units. John Mossler used this approach to classify the stratigraphy of these carbonates and shales on Plate 2, Part A. Green and others (1997) also described these rock units as aquifers and confining units similar to those in Iowa. Pump test data and residence time information in this study supported this approach to characterizing the carbonate and shale units. This approach also has practical benefits. With approval from the Minnesota Department of Health, wells may be completed in some shallow carbonate units beneath regional shale units. This change would reduce required depths of well completion by 300 feet to 500 feet and reduce construction costs by several thousand dollars per well. The information below includes the rock unit name, aquifer symbol (where applicable, boldface in parentheses), bedrock symbol (in parentheses), and details about the rock units. A geologic column and more information about these aquifers are in the Technical Appendix. Upper Cedar Valley Aquifer (Dcvu) (Dcuu and Dcum). The Lithograph City Formation, the Coralville Formation, and the Hinkle and Eagle Center Members of the Little Cedar Formation form a shallow bedrock aquifer. The Lithograph City unit contains many joints, fractures, and bedding planes enlarged by solution resulting in a well-developed conduit network and high permeability (Green and others, 1997). The Coralville unit contains shale beds that may be several feet thick but are discontinuous (Libra and Hallberg, 1985). Most permeability in this aquifer is fracture related, with water moving through joints or bedding planes. The lower part of the aquifer has less solution-related permeability than the Lithograph City. This aquifer is up to 110 feet thick. Chickasaw Shale (Dclc). This silty shale has low permeability and hydrologically separates the Upper Cedar Valley above from the Lower Cedar Valley underneath. It has been mapped on Plate 2, Part A, and is clearly shown on the gamma log in the Technical Appendix. In western Mower County, buried stream valleys dissect it. This unit is 36 feet to 43 feet thick in southeastern Mower County and 15 feet to 20 feet thick in western Mower County. Lower Cedar Valley Aquifer (Dcvl) (Dclp). The Bassett Member of the Little Cedar Formation forms a thin aquifer (Green and others, 1997) and is 40 feet to 70 feet thick. The upper and lower parts of the Pinicon Ridge Formation contain shale and shaly dolostone that may act as confining units. The Pinicon Ridge Formation is 20 feet to 47 feet thick. These shaly units were not mapped in Part A, and the distribution of data for this study is inconclusive regarding the ability of the Pinicon Ridge shales to hydrologically separate the Lower Cedar Valley aquifer from the underlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer. However, results from a pump test in Le Roy provide local evidence that the shales from the Pinicon Ridge do separate the Lower Cedar Valley aquifer from the underlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer (Green and others, 1997). Spillville-Maquoketa Aquifer (Dsom) (Dspl and Omaq). The Spillville and Maquoketa formations form a single aquifer unit in Mower County. The porosity and permeability in the upper part of the Spillville is due to fractures and in the lower part is due to fossil features (Plate 2, Part A). The upper part of the Maquoketa has extensive fracturing possibly because of exposure at the surface before the deposition of the overlying Spillville Formation. The lower part of the Maquoketa has many thin shale units and grades into the underlying Dubuque Formation, which together hydrologically separate the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer from the Galena Group aquifer. The Spillville and Maquoketa formations together are up to 170 feet thick. Dubuque Formation (Odub). This formation consist of limestone interbedded with thin to medium beds of calcareous shale. It is a confining unit that separates the overlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer from the underlying Galena aquifer and is 23 feet to 35 feet thick. Galena Group Aquifer (Ogal) (Ogal). The Galena Group, which is an important regional aquifer, comprises the Stewartville Formation, Prosser Limestone, and Cummingsville Formation. The Stewartville and Prosser both have more well-developed porosity and permeability than the Cummingsville and form an aquifer. The greatest permeability of the group occurs where the aquifer is near the surface and has well-developed karst features. Total thickness of this group is 200 feet to 205 feet. Decorah Shale–Platteville Formation–Glenwood Formation (Odpg). These three formations are treated collectively because they are found between two extensive regional aquifers. Only the Decorah Shale and Glenwood Formation have predictable low-permeability characteristics. They effectively separate the Galena Group aquifer from the underlying St. Peter Sandstone and have a combined thickness of 45 feet to 50 feet. The Platteville Formation is a thin limestone aquifer (30 feet thick) between the Decorah Shale and the Glenwood Formation. Although it is not heavily used for water supply, the Glenwood Formation can transport large quantities of water. Geologic Units and Aquifers Potentiometric Contour Cross-Section Symbols Dcvu Dclc Dclc Dcvu Dcvl Dcvu Dcvu Dclc Dclc Dcvl Dcvu Dclc Dsom Dclc Dcvl Dsom Dsom Odub Dsom Dcvl Dsom Odub Dsom Dsom Dcvl Dcvl Dclc Dcvu Dcvu Dclc Dcvu Dclc Dcvu Dcvu Dcvu Dcvl Dclc Dcvu Dcvu Dcvu Dcvu Dclc Dcvu Dcvu Dcvu Dcvl Dclc Dcvl Dsom Dsom Dsom Odub Ogal Dsom Dsom Dsom Dcvl Ogal Odub Dsom Dsom Dsom Dsom Dcvu Dclc Dcvl Dcvu Dsom Dcvu Dcvu Dclc Dcvu Dsom Ogal Dcvl Upper Iowa River ( ) 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES SCALE 1:146 000 0 2 4 6 8 KILOMETERS VERTICAL EXAGGERATION X 40 1280 1260 1300 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200 1240 1280 1300 1320 1260 1240 1220 1200 1180 1160 1180 1180 1200 1220 1240 1240 1260 1280 1320 1300 1320 1340 1200 1220 1200 1240 1220 1260 1240 1280 1300 1200 1260 DNR Waters

GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF MOWER COUNTY, MINNESOTAfiles.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/mapping/cga/c11... · Plate 8 for a description of radiometric dating of ground water

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

COUNTY ATLAS SERIESATLAS C11, PART B, PLATE 7 OF 10

Bedrock Hydrogeology

STATE OF MINNESOTADEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCESDIVISION OF WATERS

GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF MOWER COUNTY, MINNESOTA

Dclp

Digital base map composite:Roads and county boundariesMinnesota Department of Transportation GIS Statewide Base

Map (source scale 1:24,000)Hydrologic featuresU.S. Geological Survey Digital Line Graphs (source scale 1:100,000)Digital base map annotationMinnesota Geological Survey.

Project data compiled from 1997 to 2001 at the scale of 1:100,000. Universal TransverseMercator projection, grid zone 15, 1983 North American datum. Vertical datum is mean sealevel.

GIS data and metadata available through the DNR Waters website: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters

BEDROCK HYDROGEOLOGY

By

Moira Campion

2002

MAP EXPLANATION

Well Label

If shown, ground-water age in years, estimated bycarbon-14

30,000

Map Symbols

TM

This information is available in an alternative format on request.

This map was compiled and generated using geographic information systems (GIS)technology. Digital data products are available from DNR Waters.

This map was prepared from publicly available information only. Every reasonableeffort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the factual data on which this mapinterpretation is based. However, the Department of Natural Resources does not warrantthe accuracy, completeness, or any implied uses of these data. Users may wish to verifycritical information; sources include both the references here and information on file in theoffices of the Minnesota Geological Survey and the Minnesota Department of NaturalResources. Every effort has been made to ensure the interpretation shown conforms tosound geologic and cartographic principles. This map should not be used to establish legaltitle, boundaries, or locations of improvements.

Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the MinnesotaDepartment of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color,national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance,age, or disability. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 LafayetteRoad, St. Paul, MN 55155-4031; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior,Washington, DC 20240.

The DNR Information CenterTwin Cities: (651) 296-6157Minnesota Toll Free: 1-888-646-6367Telecommunication Device for the

Hearing Impaired (TDD): (651) 296-5484TDD Minnesota Toll Free: 1-800-657-3929DNR Web Site: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us

2002 State of Minnesota,Department of Natural Resources, and theRegents of the University of Minnesota

U.S. 63

Waltham

Brownsdale Racine

Lansing

Maple View

I-90Grand

Meadow

U.S. 218

Elkton

Adams

U.S. 218

Lyle

Le Roy

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)

E

leva

tion

(fee

t abo

ve s

ea le

vel)Cedar River

Cedar River

Cedar River ( )

Cedar River ( )

CedarRiver ( )

Cedar River

I-90RobinsonCreek ( )

Dexter

RootRiver

RoseCreek

Roberts Creek ( )

UpperIowa River ( )

Austin

I-90

Dubuque Formation

Upper Cedar Valley aquifer

Lower Cedar Valley aquifer

Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer

Galena Group aquifer

Chickasaw shale

Potentiometric contour of aquifers in feetabove mean sea levelContour interval is20 feet. Dashed where contour is uncertain.Arrow indicates general direction of ground-water movement.

Upper Cedar Valley

Spillville-Maquoketa

Lower Cedar Valley

Upper Cedar Valley

Lower Cedar Valley

Spillville-Maquoketa

Wells measured for static water level

Dcvu

Dcvl

Dsom

Ogal

Greater than 75 feetof till cover

CROSS-SECTION EXPLANATION

RecentWater entered the ground since 1953 (10 or more tritium units).Well screen color shows recent water.

MixedWater is a mixture of recent and vintage waters(0.8 to less than 10 tritium units). Well screen color shows mixed water.

VintageWater entered the ground before 1953 (less than 0.8 tritium units).Well screen color shows vintage water.

Upper Cedar Valley aquifer

Sand and gravel deposits

Undifferentiated till

Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer

Lower Cedar Valley aquifer

Dubuque Formation

Chickasaw shale

Galena Group aquifer

St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer

Decorah-Platteville-Glenwood map unit*

Very oldWater with carbon-14 age greater than 10,000 years before present.Well screen color shows vintage water.

In feet above mean sea level.Contour interval is 20 feet. Arrowindicates general direction of ground-water movement

If shown, ground-water age in years,estimated by carbon-14Vintage water shallower than mixed waterSV

18,000

Spring associated with streamGround-water flow into the cross sectionGround-water flow out of the cross section

Odub

Dclc LOCATION DIAGRAM

Upper Cedar Valley

Spillville-MaquoketaLower Cedar Valley

*The Decorah Shale and Glenwood Formation both act as confining units, but the interveningPlatteville Formation is a thin aquifer. Combined, these units are treated as a confining unit.

28,000

9000

6

5

7

3

90

90

218

5

6

56

2

1

20

7

63

4

90

20

6

218

2

3

4

11

14

1

8

8

7

5

7

7

1

105

56

14

16

3

3

4

56 7

105

5

56

16

16

16

16

56

T 102 N

T 104 N

R 18 W R 17 W R 16 WR 15 W R 14 W

T 101 N

T 103 N

R 14 WR 15 W

R 16 WR 17 WR 18 W

T 104 N

T 103 N

T 102 N

T 101 N

9245'9300'

4345'

4330'

4345'

4330'9230'9245'9300'

9230'

Racine

MeadowGrand

Le Roy

Taopi

Adams

CreekRose

Austin

Maple View

Brownsdale

Waltham

Dexter

Elkton

Lyle

Lansing

Varco

Sargeant

UDOLPHO

WALTHAM

SARGEANT

PLEASANTVALLEY

RACINE

FRANKFORD

GRANDMEADOW

DEXTER

AUSTIN

WINDOM

LE ROY

LODINEVADALYLE

CLAYTON

RED ROCK

LANSING

MARSHALL BENNINGTON

Cedar

R

iver

Mill PondRamsey

Wolf Creek

Dobb

ins

Cre

ek

MurphyCreek

Orc hard

Cr eek

Woodbury Creek

Ceda

r

Rive

rRos e Creek

Otter Creek

Little

Cedar

River

Upper

Iowa

R iver

L ittl

e

Iow

a

Rive

r

Nor

thB

ranc

hUp

p

er I

ow

aR

iver

South

Branch

Roo

t

River

Deer Creek

Deer

Cree

k

South Fork

Bear

Creek

North

Cree

kBearFork

Creek

Robin

son

Creek

North

Bra

nch

Root

Riv

er

Ro berts Creek

C

ar

ey

16

31 36

1

36

616

31 36 31

1661

3631

1

36

6

31 36 31

1616

31 36 3136

1616

31363136

16

31

1

36

6

31

1

313631

6

31

6

1

36

6

31

1

31

36

36

3636 31

31

1 6 1

36

61

31

6

Upper Cedar Valley

Spillville-Maquoketa

Lower Cedar Valley1200

1200

1200

SV

SV

SV

SVSV

Characterization of Bedrock Hydrogeology

This plate displays the Mower County aquifer system in map and cross-sectionviews. This presentation provides practical information about the hydrogeology inthe county, which is crucial to understanding ground-water supply and managementissues. The information also was essential to the development of the pollutionsensitivity map on Plate 9. Concepts that require more detailed explanation arediscussed on Plate 8 and in the Technical Appendix.

The interpretation of the bedrock hydrogeology was modified from a historicalone-aquifer system to a sequence of several aquifers and confining units. Thisapproach has been used by hydrogeologists in Iowa and Minnesota (see Plate 2, PartA). The presence of regional shale confining units provides protection from surfacecontamination in areas with limited, low-permeability glacial cover. Mapping theshallow confining units at a countywide scale provides an opportunity to avoiddrilling unnecessarily deep wells for drinking water supply. Regulators who knowthe location of the regional shale units can target aquifers that may be hydrologicallyprotected from surface contamination. This can reduce drilling costs for municipalitiesand residents who depend on ground water for drinking water, irrigation, and industry.

The bedrock aquifers, confining units, and major mapped faults in the countyare shown on the map, and a pattern overlies the area where till thickness is greaterthan 75 feet. Cretaceous deposits are thin and discontinuous; they are not shown onthe map or cross sections. The potentiometric surfaces for the three uppermostaquifers are shown with 20-foot contours of different colors, as well as the locationsof wells used to develop the potentiometric contours. The locations of wells sampledfor geochemistry and for residence time information from tritium and carbon-14 agedating are also displayed. The cross sections show the arrangement of aquifers andconfining units at depth and colored residence time interpretations based on the age-dating results from the sampled wells. All sampled wells have been projected ontothe closest cross section. No well is more than 2 miles from a cross section. SeePlate 8 for a description of radiometric dating of ground water.

The map shows potentiometric contours of the Upper Cedar Valley, LowerCedar Valley, and Spillville-Maquoketa aquifers. The small data points showing thewell locations used to develop these surfaces are displayed in colors correspondingto the contours. There are few locations where wells from shallower and deeperaquifers are close enough to one another to be used as nests for a point-by-pointcomparison of water-level information from different aquifers. Enough data pointsexist, however, to show that the potentiometric surface of each aquifer is different.The potentiometric differences between the Upper Cedar Valley and the Lower CedarValley aquifers are subtle in the southeastern part of the county. Greater differencesappear in the center of cross-section EE. The difference between the potentiometricsurfaces of the Lower Cedar Valley and the Spillville-Maquoketa is most obviousin the center of the map and in the center of cross-section CC. Generally, groundwater flows from east-central Mower County to the south and west in the Upper andLower Cedar Valley aquifers. In the northeast, ground water in the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer flows from the center of the county to the north. In the northwest,ground water in the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer flows south through potentiometrictroughs toward the Cedar River discharge area. Generally, potentiometric differencesare smallest at the Cedar and Little Iowa rivers, which are regional discharge areas.

Recent ground water was found in samples from 12 wells based on tritiumdating. Nine of the wells with samples of recent water have till cover less than 75feet thick. For most of the central and northeastern parts of the county, ground watergets progressively older with depth. This is a typical way for water to infiltrate fromthe land surface into the bedrock aquifers. However, there are areas shown on cross-sections AA and CC where samples of vintage waters were found shallowerthan the samples of mixed waters in deeper nearby wells. In southwest and southeastMower County, the distribution of recent, mixed, and vintage samples on the crosssections is different from the rest of the county. Recent and mixed waters are foundat great depths. Recent and mixed waters found at depth indicate focused recharge.Faulting and sinkholes are also found in the western portion of CC and DDand the eastern portion of EE and FF. The presence of faulting and karst featuresmay be a factor in focused recharge. These residence time patterns are discussed inmore detail on Plate 8.

Mower County has an abundant supply of high-quality drinking water in thebedrock aquifers found throughout the county. Ground water in the two uppermostbedrock aquifers flows from the east-central part of the county to the south and west.In the northeast, ground water in the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer flows from thecenter of the county generally to the north. Results of age dating show that till thickerthan 75 feet can restrict infiltration from the land surface to the bedrock aquifers.The faults and karst features in the west and southeast may contribute to the focusedrecharge of the bedrock aquifers from the land surface.

REFERENCES CITED

Green, J. A., Mossler, J. H., Alexander, S. C., and Alexander, E. C., Jr., 1997, Karsthydrogeology of Le Roy Township, Mower County, Minnesota: MinnesotaGeological Survey Open-File Report 97-2, 2 pls., scale 1:24,000.

Libra, R. D., and Hallberg, G. R., 1985, Hydrogeologic observations from multiplecore holes and piezometers in the Devonian carbonate aquifers in Floyd andMitchell counties, Iowa: Iowa Geological Survey Open File Report 85-2, Part1, p. 119.

1200

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

1200

1100

1000

900

1300

1100

1000

900

800

700

1300

1200

1100

1000

1300 1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

1200

1100

1000

700

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1000

1100

1200

1300

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

700

600

500

600

800

18,000

16,000

6000

2500

6000

7500

9000

35,000

6000

9000

7500 10,000

8000

43,000

28,000

3000

750010,000

Tritium units: 1Casing depth: 695 feetDepth completed: 911 feet

2500

16,000

18,000

7500

6000

9000

35,000

3000

6000

8000

43,000

Tritium units: less than 0.8Casing depth: 930 feetDepth completed: 1035 feet

6000

A

B

C

D

E

F

A

B

C

D

E

F

A

B

C

D

E

F

F

E

D

C

B

A

Uppermost Bedrock Aquifers and Confining Units

Potentiometric Contour

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES

SCALE 1:100 000

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KILOMETERS

Aquifer orconfining unit SymbolWell Symbols

Shape indicates aquifer type

Spillville-Maquoketa

Upper Cedar ValleyLower Cedar Valley

St. Peter-Prairie du Chien-JordanGalena Group

Color indicates tritium age

RecentWaters with tritium concentrations of 10 tritiumunits (TU) or more entered the ground water since 1953.

MixedWaters with 0.8 to 10 TU are a mixture of recentand vintage.

Quaternary

Spillville Maquoketa

Cedar Valley UpperCedar Valley Lower

St. Peter-Prairiedu Chien-JordanGalena

Quaternary

Aquifername

AquiferCode

Lithologiccode on map

Quaternary

DSOM

DCVUQ

DCVL

Fault line

Spillville Maquoketa

Cedar Valley UpperCedar Valley Lower

St. Peter-Prairiedu Chien-JordanGalena

Quaternary

Aquifername

AquiferCode

Lithologiccode on map

Quaternary

DSOM

DCVUQ

DCVL

Spring

VintageWaters with less than 0.8 TU enteredthe ground water before 1953.

MULTIAQUIFER SYSTEM IN DEVONIAN ANDUPPER ORDOVICIAN BEDROCK IN MOWER COUNTY

Most of the previous hydrogeologic studies in Mower County describe a single, thick bedrock aquifer underlying the county. This studypresents the Devonian and upper Ordovician bedrock as a sequence of carbonate aquifers separated by shale units. Hydrogeologists in Iowa(Libra and Hallberg, 1985) first classified the rocks as regionally extensive carbonate and shale units that compose a regional system ofaquifers and confining units. John Mossler used this approach to classify the stratigraphy of these carbonates and shales on Plate 2, Part A.Green and others (1997) also described these rock units as aquifers and confining units similar to those in Iowa. Pump test data and residencetime information in this study supported this approach to characterizing the carbonate and shale units. This approach also has practicalbenefits. With approval from the Minnesota Department of Health, wells may be completed in some shallow carbonate units beneath regionalshale units. This change would reduce required depths of well completion by 300 feet to 500 feet and reduce construction costs by severalthousand dollars per well.

The information below includes the rock unit name, aquifer symbol (where applicable, boldface in parentheses), bedrock symbol (inparentheses), and details about the rock units. A geologic column and more information about these aquifers are in the Technical Appendix.

Upper Cedar Valley Aquifer (Dcvu) (Dcuu and Dcum). The Lithograph City Formation, the Coralville Formation, and the Hinkleand Eagle Center Members of the Little Cedar Formation form a shallow bedrock aquifer. The Lithograph City unit contains many joints,fractures, and bedding planes enlarged by solution resulting in a well-developed conduit network and high permeability (Green and others,1997). The Coralville unit contains shale beds that may be several feet thick but are discontinuous (Libra and Hallberg, 1985). Mostpermeability in this aquifer is fracture related, with water moving through joints or bedding planes. The lower part of the aquifer has lesssolution-related permeability than the Lithograph City. This aquifer is up to 110 feet thick.

Chickasaw Shale (Dclc). This silty shale has low permeability and hydrologically separates the Upper Cedar Valley above from theLower Cedar Valley underneath. It has been mapped on Plate 2, Part A, and is clearly shown on the gamma log in the Technical Appendix.In western Mower County, buried stream valleys dissect it. This unit is 36 feet to 43 feet thick in southeastern Mower County and 15 feetto 20 feet thick in western Mower County.

Lower Cedar Valley Aquifer (Dcvl) (Dclp). The Bassett Member of the Little Cedar Formation forms a thin aquifer (Green and others,1997) and is 40 feet to 70 feet thick. The upper and lower parts of the Pinicon Ridge Formation contain shale and shaly dolostone that mayact as confining units. The Pinicon Ridge Formation is 20 feet to 47 feet thick. These shaly units were not mapped in Part A, and the distributionof data for this study is inconclusive regarding the ability of the Pinicon Ridge shales to hydrologically separate the Lower Cedar Valleyaquifer from the underlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer. However, results from a pump test in Le Roy provide local evidence that the shalesfrom the Pinicon Ridge do separate the Lower Cedar Valley aquifer from the underlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer (Green and others,1997).

Spillville-Maquoketa Aquifer (Dsom) (Dspl and Omaq). The Spillville and Maquoketa formations form a single aquifer unit in MowerCounty. The porosity and permeability in the upper part of the Spillville is due to fractures and in the lower part is due to fossil features (Plate2, Part A). The upper part of the Maquoketa has extensive fracturing possibly because of exposure at the surface before the deposition ofthe overlying Spillville Formation. The lower part of the Maquoketa has many thin shale units and grades into the underlying DubuqueFormation, which together hydrologically separate the Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer from the Galena Group aquifer. The Spillville andMaquoketa formations together are up to 170 feet thick.

Dubuque Formation (Odub). This formation consist of limestone interbedded with thin to medium beds of calcareous shale. It is aconfining unit that separates the overlying Spillville-Maquoketa aquifer from the underlying Galena aquifer and is 23 feet to 35 feet thick.

Galena Group Aquifer (Ogal) (Ogal). The Galena Group, which is an important regional aquifer, comprises the Stewartville Formation,Prosser Limestone, and Cummingsville Formation. The Stewartville and Prosser both have more well-developed porosity and permeabilitythan the Cummingsville and form an aquifer. The greatest permeability of the group occurs where the aquifer is near the surface and haswell-developed karst features. Total thickness of this group is 200 feet to 205 feet.

Decorah ShalePlatteville FormationGlenwood Formation (Odpg). These three formations are treated collectively because theyare found between two extensive regional aquifers. Only the Decorah Shale and Glenwood Formation have predictable low-permeabilitycharacteristics. They effectively separate the Galena Group aquifer from the underlying St. Peter Sandstone and have a combined thicknessof 45 feet to 50 feet. The Platteville Formation is a thin limestone aquifer (30 feet thick) between the Decorah Shale and the GlenwoodFormation. Although it is not heavily used for water supply, the Glenwood Formation can transport large quantities of water.

Geologic Units and Aquifers

Potentiometric Contour Cross-Section Symbols

Dcvu

Dclc

Dclc

DcvuDcvl

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dclc

Dclc

Dcvl

Dcvu

Dclc

Dsom

Dclc

Dcvl

Dsom

Dsom

OdubDsom

Dcvl

Dsom

Odub

Dsom

DsomDcvl

Dcvl

Dclc

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dclc

Dcvu

Dclc

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dcvl

Dclc

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dcvu Dcvu

Dclc

Dcvu

Dcvu

DcvuDcvl

Dclc

Dcvl

Dsom

Dsom

Dsom

Odub

Ogal

Dsom

Dsom

Dsom

Dcvl

Ogal

Odub

Dsom

Dsom

Dsom

Dsom

DcvuDclc

Dcvl

Dcvu

Dsom

Dcvu

Dcvu

Dclc

Dcvu

Dsom

Ogal

Dcvl

Upper IowaRiver ( )

1 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES

SCALE 1:146 000

0 2 4 6 8 KILOMETERS

VERTICAL EXAGGERATION X 40

1280

1260

1300

1280

1260

1240

1220

1200

1240

1280

1300

1320

1260

12401220

1200

1180

1160

1180

1180

1200

1220

1240

1240

1260

1280

1320 1300

1320

1340

1200

1220

1200

1240

1220

1260

1240

1280

1300

1200

1260

DNRWaters