113
Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Geographic Isolation Scenarios

  • Upload
    moesha

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Geographic Isolation Scenarios. Purpose. Understand which basins affect which areas of the bay and by how much. Procedure. Set the Susquehanna at Tier 3 loads and all other watersheds at 2000 levels Record the relative change in attainment for each criterion and designated use area - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Page 2: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Purpose

• Understand which basins affect which areas of the bay and by how much

Page 3: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Procedure

• Set the Susquehanna at Tier 3 loads and all other watersheds at 2000 levels

• Record the relative change in attainment for each criterion and designated use area

• Repeat for each basin

Page 4: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Progress

• All basins completed

• Results are provisional

Page 5: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Other Considerations

• Final criteria curves not implemented

• Final model applications areas not decided

• Final designated use boundaries and clarity depths not decided

• Problem with the interpolator

Page 6: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - CB3MH

7

2620

0 1

57

9

10

10

39

10

85

6470

9789

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DO open water DO Deep Water DO Deep Channel Chlorophyll spring Chlorophyllsummer

Clarity

Page 7: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Sample OutputCB3MH

BasinDO open

waterDO Deep

WaterDO Deep Channel

Total 4.65 12.98 17.54Susquehanna 3.30 9.29 12.79MD Western Shore 0.60 0.49 0.40MD Eastern Shore 0.26 1.19 1.09Patuxent 0.03 0.06 0.15Potomac 0.28 1.41 2.36Rappahannock 0.03 0.09 0.15York 0.03 0.06 0.13James 0.07 0.27 0.31VA Eastern Shore 0.04 0.12 0.16Tier3 4.49 17.12 20.18

% Attainment Increase

Page 8: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

DO Deep Water CB3MH

Susquehanna72%

MD Western Shore4%

MD Eastern Shore9%

Patuxent0%

Potomac11%

Rappahannock1%

York0%

James2%

VA Eastern Shore1%

Page 9: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Graphical Output - absolute changeEffectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Main Bay

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 10: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Normalized OutputCB3MH

BasinDO open

waterDO Deep

WaterDO Deep Channel

lbs of => N N NSusquehanna 0.076 0.213 0.293MD Western Shore 0.114 0.093 0.076MD Eastern Shore 0.027 0.122 0.112Patuxent 0.029 0.065 0.156Potomac 0.012 0.059 0.098Rappahannock 0.011 0.031 0.049York 0.009 0.021 0.044James 0.006 0.020 0.023VA Eastern Shore 0.037 0.104 0.139Tier3 0.043 0.165 0.194

% Attainment Increase per million lbs

Page 11: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Graphical Output - NormalizedRelative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Main Bay

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 12: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Absolute Dissolved Oxygen Open Water

Absolute Dissolved Oxygen Deep Water

Legend<Null>

ESMD

James

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

SAME

Susquehanna

York

Page 13: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Absolute ClarityAbsolute Dissolved Oxygen Deep Channel

Legend<Null>

ESMD

James

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

SAME

Susquehanna

York

Page 14: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Absolute Spring Chlorophyll Absolute Summer Chlorophyll

Legend<Null>

ESMD

James

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

SAME

Susquehanna

York

Page 15: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Results

• Problems (red areas)

• Who has biggest impact

• Who has biggest relative effectiveness

Page 16: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Channel - Main Bay

#N/A 0

20

39

4 #N/A #N/A #N/A#N/A 1

10

10

10

#N/A #N/A #N/A#N/A

99

70

51

86

#N/A #N/A #N/A0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 17: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Channel - Main Bay

0

5

10

15

20

25

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 18: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Channel - Main Bay

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 19: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Channel - Potomac

#N/A #N/A 9#N/A #N/A

9

#N/A #N/A

82

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 20: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Channel - Potomac

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 21: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Channel - Potomac

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 22: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - Main Bay

#N/A 0

26

38

9 3 0 #N/A#N/A 3

10

10

10

94 #N/A#N/A

97

64

52

8189

96

#N/A0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 23: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Main Bay

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 24: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Main Bay

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 25: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - Patuxent

#N/A #N/A

23

#N/A #N/A

10

#N/A #N/A

67

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Page 26: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Patuxent

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 27: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Patuxent

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 28: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - Potomac

#N/A #N/A

29

#N/A #N/A

10

#N/A #N/A

61

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 29: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Potomac

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 30: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Potomac

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 31: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - Rappahannock

#N/A #N/A

19

#N/A#N/A #N/A

10

#N/A#N/A #N/A

71

#N/A0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Page 32: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Rappahannock

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 33: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Rappahannock

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 34: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - York

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0 0#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 6 5#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

94 95

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Page 35: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - York

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 36: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - York

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mil

lio

n l

bs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 37: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Deep Water - Eastern Shore

53

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

10

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

37

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Page 38: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Eastern Shore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 39: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Deep Water - Eastern Shore

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 40: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - Main Bay

0 0 7 4 0 0 1 02 5

99

2 4 8 3

98 95

85 88

98 9691

97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 41: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Main Bay

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 42: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Main Bay

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 43: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - Patuxent

0 0 42 3

9

98 97

87

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Page 44: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Patuxent

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 45: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Patuxent

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 46: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - Potomac

0 0 53 6

9

97 94

86

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 47: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Potomac

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 48: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Potomac

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

POTTF POTOH POTMHGre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 49: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - Rappahannock

0 0 0 01 1 6 5

99 9994 95

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Page 50: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Rappahannock

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 51: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Rappahannock

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 52: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - York

0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 2 1 3 5 3

99 99 98 99 97 95 97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Page 53: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - York

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 54: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - York

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 55: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - James

0 0 0 01 1 1 3

99 99 99 97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Page 56: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - James

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 57: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - James

0

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

0.014

0.016

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 58: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - DO Open Water - Eastern Shore

2 0 0 0 0 08

4 6 7 6 1

9096 94 93 94

99

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Page 59: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Eastern Shore

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en

pe

rce

nta

ge

po

ints

ga

ine

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 60: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - DO Open Water - Eastern Shore

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.1

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 61: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - Main Bay

2 4 0 0 1 8 8 656

2 2 3

6 66

9489

98 98 96

86 86 89

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 62: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Main Bay

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 63: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - Patuxent

5 3 1

44

4

91 93 94

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Page 64: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Patuxent

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 65: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - Potomac

0 0 24 25

95 9893

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 66: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Potomac

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 67: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - Rappahannock

2 0 1 04 2 3 2

9498 97 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Page 68: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Rappahannock

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 69: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - York

0 0 0 0 1 3 22 2 2 2 34 5

98 98 98 98 9692 93

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Page 70: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - York

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 71: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - York

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 72: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - James

6 1 1

215

4 3

7

8996 97

73

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Page 73: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - James

-5

0

5

10

15

20

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 74: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - James

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 75: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Spring - Eastern Shore

0 1 0 0 0 02 3 2 3 2 2

98 96 98 97 98 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Page 76: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Eastern Shore

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 77: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll spring - Eastern Shore

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 78: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - Main Bay

0 2 4 1 0 0 0 034

54 2 3 2 2

96 94 9195 98 97 98 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 79: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - Main Bay

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en

pe

rce

nta

ge

po

ints

ga

ine

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 80: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - Patuxent

37

19

5

8

8

5

55

73

90

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Page 81: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - Patuxent

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 82: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - Potomac

23

1 2

8

4 4

69

95 94

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 83: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - Potomac

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 84: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - Rappahannock

18

0 0 0

6

2 2 2

76

98 98 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Page 85: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - Rappahannock

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 86: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - York

0 0 0 0 2 0 02 2 2 23 3 2

98 97 98 9895 97 97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Page 87: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - York

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 88: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - James

27

1 0 0

8

4 2 2

65

95 98 98

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Page 89: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - James

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 90: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Chlorophyll Summer - Eastern Shore

112

0 2 0 05

7

24

2 3

94

81

9894

98 97

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Page 91: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Chlorophyll summer - Eastern Shore

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 92: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - Main Bay

62

5259

43 41 4036 36

9

9

9

98 8

8 8

30

40

32

48 51 5155 56

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Page 93: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Main Bay

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 94: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Main Bay

-0.01

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

CB1TF CB2OH CB3MH CB4MH CB5MH CB6PH CB7PH CB8PHGre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 95: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - Patuxent

2925 28

78

8

6367

63

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Page 96: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Patuxent

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 97: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Patuxent

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

PAXTF PAXOH PAXMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 98: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - Potomac

62

51

32

8

8

8

30

41

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Page 99: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Potomac

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 100: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Potomac

0

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

0.014

POTTF POTOH POTMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 101: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - Rappahannock

43

13

29

55

8

6

6

8

49

81

65

37

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Page 102: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Rappahannock

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 103: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Rappahannock

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

RPPTF RPPOH RPPMH PIAMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 104: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - York

38

17

27

44

1722 24

8

6

8

8

6

77

54

76

65

49

7771 68

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Page 105: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - York

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 106: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - York

-0.01

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

PMKTF PMKOH MPNTF MPNOH YRKMH YRKPH MOBPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 107: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - James

50

33

22

12

8

7

8

6

42

61

71

82

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Page 108: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - James

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 109: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - James

-0.005

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

0.025

0.03

0.035

0.04

0.045

0.05

JMSTF JMSOH JMSMH JMSPH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 110: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Criteria Achievement - Clarity - Eastern Shore

41

87

40 43

32

9

8

9

87

8

6

51

4

52 50

61

85

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Page 111: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Eastern Shore

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Page 112: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Relative Effectiveness of Reductions - Clarity - Eastern Shore

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.1

EASMH CHOOH CHOMH1 CHOMH2 TANMH POCMH

Gre

en p

erce

nta

ge

po

ints

gai

ned

per

mill

ion

lbs

red

uce

d

Susquehanna

MD Western Shore

Patuxent

Potomac

Rappahannock

York

James

MD Eastern Shore

VA Eastern Shore

Tier3 Average

Page 113: Geographic Isolation Scenarios

Still to Come

• New interpolator runs.• Revise with new criteria bioreference

curves, designated use boundaries, and clarity depths.

• After tidal fresh allocations are made, do a similar analysis to inform the final allocation decisions.