Generator Testing - ccj- · PDF fileGenerator Testing Power Users Conference Nov. 3-4, 2015 Bert Milano, consultant ... Polarization Index Test • PI testing stator windings is fairly

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Generator Testing Power Users Conference

    Nov. 3-4, 2015

    Bert Milano, consultant

    [email protected]

    Littleton, Colorado

    303-973-8479

    1

  • AC and DC Test Procedures

    Refer to IEEE standards and

    guides for procedures, test

    voltages etc.

    2

  • AC Tests

    AC High Potential Test

    Corona Probe Test

    Power Factor

    Partial Discharge. To be covered by

    others

    3

  • DC Tests

    Insulation Resistance (IR)

    Polarization Index (PI)

    DC High Potential Voltage Withstand

    IEEE Timed Voltage Step

    DC Ramp

    Reverse Energization

    4

  • DC Testing Currents

    Leakage

    Conduction

    Polarization Capacitive

    Polarization Absorption ***

    molecular orientation very slow!

    Decays, hours, asphalt vs. epoxy

    Degree of cross linking

    5

  • DC Insulation Resistance

    Comments:

    Resistance corrected for temperature

    Sensitive to moisture, contamination

    Temperature correction issues

    Instrumentation

    1 minuteAbsorption current

    6

  • Polarization Index Test

    PI testing stator windings is fairly common

    If PI decreases Insulation quality concern

    leakage, conduction, water, moisture,

    contamination or deterioration

    For applied step voltage V:

    PI = I1 minute / I10 minute Where I is the total insulation current:

    leakage ,conduction, absorption (cap.0)

    7

  • Polarization Index Test

    PI = I1 (leakage + conduction + absorption)

    I10 (leakage + conduction + absorption)

    Leakage and Cross linking

    8

  • Polarization Index Test

    Reading obtained at 0.5 minute ***

    Every minute to 10 minutes

    Ratio, no units, size and temperature fairly

    independent

    Numbers greater than 2 acceptable

    High PI number comments

    9

  • Polarization Index Test

    Significant Digits

    0.5/0.07 = 7.14. Wrong

    7 Correct

    Can raise concerns over the years

    Commercial test sets. excellent

    10

  • Polarization Index Test

    Below 2 winding wet, dirty, contaminated

    Instrumentation accuracy

    Thermal/PD damage/aging may affect IA

    0.5 minute reading

    Plot the data

    See IEEE standards for further analysis

    My paper

    11

  • Absorption Current Response

    IA=VCKT-n

    Where V is the applied voltage step

    C is the capacitance

    T is time

    K is the insulation constant

    n is the absorption exponent

    K and n can change with aging/damage

    12

  • n Log10(PI)

    IIA

    1 10

    Time (minutes)

    I

    IA (per IEEE)

    13

  • PI Test

    Why the 0.5 minute

    reading?

    &

    Why plot?

    14

  • PI I1/I10

    1

    I=IA

    10

    Time (minutes)

    0.1

    15

  • Crystal Bar Log-Log Plot

    New bar,11.5 kV (rated13.8 kV), 35 MVA

    Epoxy mica insulation, hydro unit

    Excellent insulation (new)

    Bar never placed in service

    5 kV PI, inflection at 1.5 minutes

    Error without the plot trending issue

    16

  • Figure 2 Crystal Bar

    0.0001

    0.001

    0.01

    0.1

    0.1 1 10

    Time (minutes)

    Cu

    rren

    t (u

    A)

    PI = 27.8

    K = 1.43E-3

    n = 1.44PI = 64

    K = 1.46E-3

    n = 1.81

    0.017 uA

    0.0155 uA

    17

  • Crystal Bar Ramp Test Plot

    Figure 3: Ramp DC test of a single stator (Crystal Power Plant) bar with and without grading treatment

    shorted

    Normal Grading Treatment Not Altered Grading Treatment Shorted

    18

  • Insulation Ageing

    n & K, related to insulation characteristics

    IA=VCKT-n

    Damage mainly near line end & front coils

    Thermal - chemical changes

    Mechanical - radial forces/damage

    Voltage - Partial Discharge conductive

    byproducts

    19

  • PI Differences Between Phases

    New 6.9 kV winding passed:

    Acceptable 5 kV PI, passed 16 kV dc and 14 kV ac tests

    PI test (2.00, 3.21 and 4.51)

    Failed the Ramp DC test with distinction!

    Winding rejected per DC ramp test

    20

  • PI Differences Between Phases

    Extreme conduction current

    2 phases failed

    Traced to water in 3 coils brazing

    Epoxy is not waterproof, once wet,

    delaminates, appears as insufficient

    impregnation, and stays delaminated

    PI after repairs: 3.25, 2.94, and 3.97

    21

  • Voltage (kV)

    Me

    as

    ure

    d C

    urr

    en

    t (

    A)

    FIGURE : Unacceptable ramped high-voltage DC test results

    Scale Change

    22

  • 1 Minute High Potential

    Withstand Test

    Why one minute?

    23

  • High Potential Test

    Answer:

    That is about how long a test

    engineer can hold his breath!

    24

  • AC and DC High Potential

    Withstand Testing Go no go tests

    No information as to quality

    Insulation either passes or fails

    Insulation good for 3 to 5 years ! If tested

    to the appropriate voltage

    25

  • High Potential Test

    Main objection to DC Testing:

    It stresses the end winding insulation

    And AC high-pot doesnt stress or Test

    the end windings

    26

  • Why DC Test

    Response:

    End winding has same voltage rating!

    Why not test the end winding?

    Contamination, cracks

    Grading Treatment

    27

  • High Potential Test

    End winding AC voltage during operation

    Ac voltage distribution

    Coil insulation capacitance ..high

    Air space capacitance low

    Thickness and Dielectric constant

    Voltage appears across the air gap,

    not the insulation

    28

  • 29

  • High Potential Test

    End winding DC voltage during operation

    1 minute test

    Absorption current decay.

    IR very high

    Ia determines the voltage distribution

    Voltage 15-30% of test value better (more

    searching) than the AC test

    30

  • DC High Potential Test

    Secondary objection:

    DC testing is hazardous to insulation 1959

    Response: GE promoted 0.1 Hz test set!!

    Absorption current to the rescue

    1 minute test: conduction current is much

    too low to affect the internal stress, BB

    31

  • When Contaminated End Turns

    Both tests stress the end windings

    End Winding Condition:

    Aging minimal

    Mechanical minimal

    Thermal minimal

    Voltage minimal

    32

  • Selecting the Test Voltage

    Warning:

    Hi-Pot Testing at a very low voltage is an

    unconscious decision to run the unit to

    failure.

    Testing is Insurance

    33

  • AC / DC Test Voltage Ratio

    Reclamation (2 or 3 efforts)

    EPRI and others

    No significant differences between ac & dc

    The Best study

    Brown Boveri Review, April/May 1968,

    Vol. 55, pages 208-214, Direct-Voltage

    Testing of the Insulation of Windings for

    Rotating Machines

    34

  • BB: AC/DC Test V Ratio 1.56

    35

  • AC / DC Test Voltage Ratio

    VDC maintenance test Voltage:

    1.7 times 85% = 1.44

    Still lower than the 1.56!!

    36

  • AC / DC Test Voltage Ratio

    K factors for new insulation are larger, and

    as the insulation ages the K factor drops.

    Brown Boveri states This may be taken as

    evidence that long-term changes (fatigue)

    are revealed earlier by a DC test.

    37

  • AC / DC Test Voltage Ratio

    So:

    Decide if you want your end of life winding

    to fail in service or under test

    There are other more valuable tests to

    assess without the risk of failure

    DC Ramp

    Corona Probe

    38

  • DC Ramp Testing

    39

  • Ramp DC Testing Synopsis

    Valuable non-destructive test

    Does not damage insulation

    Early warning and early termination

    Automated 16.67 V/sec, or 1kV/sec

    It is a very low-frequency test

    Current plotted against voltage (time)

    40

  • Ramp DC Testing Synopsis

    Trend over time

    Comparative analysis also of value

    Phase-to-phase

    Sister units

    Excellent repeatability

    41

  • Ramp DC Test Description

    Ramp DC Test results provide information on the following current components (see next slide example): Capacitive

    Absorption

    Leakage/Conduction

    The ramp linearizes absorption component

    Capacitive component response to ramp is a constant current

    Provides ability to analyze individual insulation current components

    Thus any non-linear response provides diagnostic value Leakage/Conduction

    42

  • IA ~ 2.6 A

    Icon. or IL ~ 0.5 A

    IC ~ 18.6 A

    Example Ramp Test

    43

  • Capacitive Component

    I = C times V