44
General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

General Explanations of the

Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals

Department of the Treasury March 2014

Page 2: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014
Page 3: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

General Explanations

of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015

Revenue Proposals

Department of the Treasury March 2014

This document is available online at: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/Pages/general explanation.aspx

Page 4: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BALANCED BUDGET AND EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT (BBEDCA) BASELINE .......................................... 1

Permanently Extend Increased Refundability of the Child Tax Credit ............................... 2 Permanently Extend Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for Larger Families and Married

Couples ................................................................................................................... 4 Permanently Extend the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) ................................. 6

RESERVE FOR LONG-RUN REVENUE-NEUTRAL BUSINESS TAX REFORM .................................................................................................................. 9

INCENTIVES FOR MANUFACTURING, RESEARCH, CLEAN ENERGY, AND INSOURCING AND CREATING JOBS ............................................................................. 10

Provide Tax Incentives for Locating Jobs and Business Activity in the United States and Remove Tax Deductions for Shipping Jobs Overseas........................................... 10

Enhance and Make Permanent the Research and Experimentation (R&E) Tax Credit ... 12 Extend and Modify Certain Employment Tax Credits, Including Incentives for Hiring

Veterans ................................................................................................................ 13 Modify and Permanently Extend Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit ............. 16 Modify and Permanently Extend the Deduction for Energy-Efficient Commercial

Building Property.................................................................................................. 18

TAX RELIEF FOR SMALL BUSINESS ............................................................................. 20 Extend Increased Expensing for Small Business .............................................................. 20 Eliminate Capital Gains Taxation on Investments in Small Business Stock .................... 22 Increase the Limitations for Deductible New Business Expenditures and Consolidate

Provisions for Start-Up and Organizational Expenditures .................................. 24 Expand and Simplify the Tax Credit Provided to Qualified Small Employers for Non-

Elective Contributions to Employee Health Insurance ......................................... 26

INCENTIVES TO PROMOTE REGIONAL GROWTH................................................... 28 Modify and Permanently Extend the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) .......................... 28 Restructure Assistance to New York City, Provide Tax Incentives for Transportation

Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 29 Reform and Expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)................................... 31

Allow Conversion of Private Activity Bond Volume Cap into Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs) .................................................................................................. 31

Encourage Mixed Income Occupancy by Allowing Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)-Supported Projects to Elect a Criterion Employing a Restriction on Average Income .................................................................................................... 33

Change Formulas for 70 Percent PV and 30 Percent PV Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs) .................................................................................................. 35

Add Preservation of Federally Assisted Affordable Housing to Allocation Criteria ....... 37 Make the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Beneficial to Real Estate Investment

Trusts (REITs) ....................................................................................................... 38 Implement Requirement That Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)-Supported

Housing Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse ........................................................ 40

Page 5: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

ii

REFORM U.S. INTERNATIONAL TAX SYSTEM .......................................................... 42 Defer Deduction of Interest Expense Related to Deferred Income of Foreign

Subsidiaries ........................................................................................................... 42 Determine the Foreign Tax Credit on a Pooling Basis .................................................... 44 Tax Currently Excess Returns Associated with Transfers of Intangibles Offshore .......... 45 Limit Shifting of Income Through Intangible Property Transfers .................................... 47 Disallow the Deduction for Excess Non-Taxed Reinsurance Premiums Paid to

Affiliates ................................................................................................................ 48 Restrict Deductions for Excessive Interest of Members of Financial Reporting Groups . 49 Modify Tax Rules for Dual Capacity Taxpayers ............................................................... 51 Tax Gain from the Sale of a Partnership Interest on Look-Through Basis ...................... 53 Prevent Use of Leveraged Distributions from Related Corporations to Avoid Dividend

Treatment .............................................................................................................. 55 Extend Section 338(h)(16) to Certain Asset Acquisitions ................................................. 56 Remove Foreign Taxes From a Section 902 Corporation’s Foreign Tax Pool When

Earnings Are Eliminated....................................................................................... 57 Create a New Category of Subpart F Income for Transactions Involving Digital Goods or

Services ................................................................................................................. 58 Prevent Avoidance of Foreign Base Company Sales Income through Manufacturing

Services Arrangements.......................................................................................... 60 Restrict the Use of Hybrid Arrangements That Create Stateless Income ......................... 61 Limit the Application of Exceptions Under Subpart F for Certain Transactions That Use

Reverse Hybrids to Create Stateless Income ........................................................ 62 Limit the Ability of Domestic Entities to Expatriate ......................................................... 64

REFORM TREATMENT OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE INDUSTRY INSTITUTIONS AND PRODUCTS ..................................................................................... 66

Require that Derivative Contracts be Marked to Market with Resulting Gain or Loss Treated as Ordinary .............................................................................................. 66

Modify Rules that Apply to Sales of Life Insurance Contracts ......................................... 69 Modify Proration Rules for Life Insurance Company General and Separate Accounts .. 71 Expand Pro Rata Interest Expense Disallowance for Corporate-Owned Life Insurance 73

ELIMINATE FOSSIL FUEL PREFERENCES .................................................................. 75 Eliminate Oil and Natural Gas Preferences .......................................................................... 75

Repeal Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Credit .................................................................. 75 Repeal Credit for Oil and Natural Gas Produced from Marginal Wells ......................... 76 Repeal Expensing of Intangible Drilling Costs ................................................................ 77 Repeal Deduction for Tertiary Injectants ......................................................................... 79 Repeal Exception to Passive Loss Limitation for Working Interests in Oil and Natural

Gas Properties ...................................................................................................... 80 Repeal Percentage Depletion for Oil and Natural Gas Wells .......................................... 81 Repeal Domestic Manufacturing Deduction for Oil and Natural Gas Production .......... 83 Increase Geological and Geophysical Amortization Period for Independent Producers to

Seven Years ........................................................................................................... 84 Eliminate Coal Preferences ................................................................................................... 85

Repeal Expensing of Exploration and Development Costs............................................... 85 Repeal Percentage Depletion for Hard Mineral Fossil Fuels .......................................... 87

Page 6: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

iii

Repeal Capital Gains Treatment for Royalties ................................................................. 89 Repeal Domestic Manufacturing Deduction for the Production of Coal and Other Hard

Mineral Fossil Fuels ............................................................................................. 90

OTHER REVENUE CHANGES AND LOOPHOLE CLOSERS...................................... 91 Repeal the Excise Tax Credit for Distilled Spirits with Flavor and Wine Additives ........ 91 Repeal Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) Method of Accounting for Inventories ........................ 93 Repeal Lower-Of-Cost-or-Market (LCM) Inventory Accounting Method ........................ 94 Modify Depreciation Rules for Purchases of General Aviation Passenger Aircraft ........ 95 Repeal Gain Limitation for Dividends Received in Reorganization Exchanges .............. 96 Expand the Definition of Substantial Built-In Loss for Purposes of Partnership Loss

Transfers ............................................................................................................... 98 Extend Partnership Basis Limitation Rules to Nondeductible Expenditures .................... 99 Limit the Importation of Losses under Related Party Loss Limitation Rules ................. 100 Deny Deduction for Punitive Damages .......................................................................... 101 Modify Like-Kind Exchange Rules for Real Property .................................................... 102 Conform Corporate Ownership Standards ..................................................................... 103 Prevent Elimination of Earnings and Profits Through Distributions of Certain Stock .. 105

BUDGET PROPOSALS ......................................................................................107

INCENTIVES FOR JOB CREATION, CLEAN ENERGY, AND MANUFACTURING ............................................................................................................ 108

Provide Additional Tax Credits for Investment in Qualified Property Used in a Qualifying Advanced Energy Manufacturing Project ........................................ 108

Designate Promise Zones ............................................................................................... 110 Provide New Manufacturing Communities Tax Credit .................................................. 113 Provide a Tax Credit for the Production of Advanced Technology Vehicles ................. 114 Provide a Tax Credit for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Alternative-Fuel Commercial

Vehicles ............................................................................................................... 116 Modify Tax-Exempt Bonds for Indian Tribal Governments ........................................... 117 Extend the Tax Credit for Cellulosic Biofuels ................................................................ 120 Modify and Extend the Tax Credit for the Construction of Energy-Efficient New

Homes ................................................................................................................. 121 Reduce Excise Taxes on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to Bring Into Parity with

Diesel .................................................................................................................. 123

INCENTIVES FOR INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE ...................................... 124 Create the America Fast Forward Bond Program ......................................................... 124 Allow Current Refundings of State and Local Governmental Bonds ............................. 127 Repeal the $150 Million Non-hospital Bond Limitation on Qualified Section 501(c)(3)

Bonds................................................................................................................... 130 Increase National Limitation Amount for Qualified Highway or Surface Freight Transfer

Facility Bonds ..................................................................................................... 131 Eliminate the Volume Cap for Private Activity Bonds for Water Infrastructure ............ 132 Increase the 25-Percent Limit on Land Acquisition Restriction on Private Activity

Bonds................................................................................................................... 134

Page 7: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

iv

Allow More Flexible Research Arrangements for Purposes of Private Business Use Limits................................................................................................................... 135

Repeal the Government Ownership Requirement for Certain Types of Exempt Facility Bonds................................................................................................................... 137

Exempt Foreign Pension Funds from the Application of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) ................................................................................ 138

TAX CUTS FOR FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS ......................................................... 139 Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for Workers without Qualifying

Children .............................................................................................................. 139 Provide for Automatic Enrollment in Individual Retirement Accounts or Annuities (IRAs),

Including a Small Employer Tax Credit, and Double the Tax Credit for Small Employer Plan Start-Up Costs............................................................................ 141

Expand the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit ........................................................ 145 Extend Exclusion from Income for Cancellation of Certain Home Mortgage Debt ....... 147 Provide Exclusion from Income for Student Loan Forgiveness for Students in Certain

Income-Based or Income-Contingent Repayment Programs Who Have Completed Payment Obligations ........................................................................................... 149

Provide Exclusion from Income for Student Loan Forgiveness and for Certain Scholarship Amounts for Participants in the Indian Health Service (IHS) Health Professions Programs ......................................................................................... 150

Make Pell Grants Excludable from Income and from Tax Credit Calculations............. 152

UPPER-INCOME TAX PROVISIONS .............................................................................. 154 Reduce the Value of Certain Tax Expenditures .............................................................. 154 Implement the Buffett Rule by Imposing a New “Fair Share Tax” ................................ 156

MODIFY ESTATE AND GIFT TAX PROVISIONS ....................................................... 158 Restore the Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax Parameters in

Effect in 2009 ...................................................................................................... 158 Require Consistency in Value for Transfer and Income Tax Purposes .......................... 160 Require a Minimum Term for Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRATs) .................... 162 Limit Duration of Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax Exemption ....................... 164 Coordinate Certain Income and Transfer Tax Rules Applicable to Grantor Trusts ...... 166 Extend the Lien on Estate Tax Deferrals where Estate Consists Largely of Interest in

Closely Held Business ......................................................................................... 168 Modify Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) Tax Treatment of Health and Education

Exclusion Trusts (HEETs)................................................................................... 169 Simplify Gift Tax Exclusion for Annual Gifts ................................................................. 170 Expand Applicability of Definition of Executor .............................................................. 172

REFORM TREATMENT OF FINANCIAL INDUSTRY INSTITUTIONS AND PRODUCTS........................................................................................................................... 173

Impose a Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee ................................................................ 173 Require Current Inclusion in Income of Accrued Market Discount and Limit the Accrual

Amount for Distressed Debt ................................................................................ 175 Require that the Cost Basis of Stock That is a Covered Security Must be Determined

Using an Average Basis Method ......................................................................... 176

Page 8: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

v

LOOPHOLE CLOSERS ...................................................................................................... 177 Tax Carried (Profits) Interests as Ordinary Income ...................................................... 177 Require Non-Spouse Beneficiaries of Deceased Individual Retirement Account or Annuity

(IRA) Owners and Retirement Plan Participants to Take Inherited Distributions Over No More than Five Years ........................................................................... 179

Limit the Total Accrual of Tax-Favored Retirement Benefits ......................................... 181 Conform Self-Employment Contributions Act (SECA) Taxes For Professional Service

Businesses ........................................................................................................... 184

OTHER REVENUE RAISERS ........................................................................................... 187 Increase Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund Financing Rate by One Cent and Update the Law

to Include Other Sources of Crudes .................................................................... 187 Reinstate Superfund Taxes ................................................................................................. 188

Reinstate and Extend Superfund Excise Taxes .......................................................... 188 Reinstate Superfund Environmental Income Tax ....................................................... 189

Increase Tobacco Taxes and Index for Inflation ............................................................ 190 Make Unemployment Insurance Surtax Permanent ....................................................... 191 Provide Short-Term Tax Relief to Employers and Expand Federal Unemployment Tax

Act (FUTA) Base ................................................................................................. 192 Enhance and Modify the Conservation Easement Deduction............................................. 193

Enhance and Make Permanent Incentives for the Donation of Conservation Easements ........................................................................................................... 193

Eliminate the Deduction for Contributions of Conservation Easements on Golf Courses ............................................................................................................... 195

Restrict Deductions and Harmonize the Rules for Contributions of Conservation Easements for Historic Preservation .................................................................. 196

Eliminate Deduction for Dividends on Stock of Publicly-Traded Corporations Held in Employee Stock Ownership Plans ...................................................................... 197

REDUCE THE TAX GAP AND MAKE REFORMS ....................................................... 199 Expand Information Reporting ........................................................................................... 199

Require Information Reporting for Private Separate Accounts of Life Insurance Companies........................................................................................................... 199

Require a Certified Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) from Contractors and Allow Certain Withholding............................................................................................ 200

Modify Reporting of Tuition Expenses and Scholarships on Form 1098-T.................... 201 Provide for Reciprocal Reporting of Information in Connection with the Implementation

of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ...................................................... 203 Improve Compliance by Businesses ................................................................................... 205

Require Greater Electronic Filing of Returns ................................................................ 205 Implement Standards Clarifying When Employee Leasing Companies Can Be Held Liable

for Their Clients’ Federal Employment Taxes.................................................... 207 Increase Certainty with Respect to Worker Classification ............................................. 209 Increase Information Sharing to Administer Excise Taxes ............................................. 212

Strengthen Tax Administration ........................................................................................... 213 Impose Liability on Shareholders to Collect Unpaid Income Taxes of Applicable

Corporations ....................................................................................................... 213

Page 9: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

vi

Increase Levy Authority for Payments to Medicare Providers with Delinquent Tax Debt ..................................................................................................................... 215

Implement a Program Integrity Statutory Cap Adjustment for Tax Administration ...... 216 Streamline Audit and Adjustment Procedures for Large Partnerships .......................... 217 Revise Offer-in-Compromise Application Rules ............................................................. 220 Expand Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Access to Information in the National Directory

of New Hires for Tax Administration Purposes .................................................. 221 Make Repeated Willful Failure to File a Tax Return a Felony ...................................... 222 Facilitate Tax Compliance with Local Jurisdictions ...................................................... 223 Extend Statute of Limitations where State Adjustment Affects Federal Tax Liability .... 224 Improve Investigative Disclosure Statute ....................................................................... 226 Require Taxpayers Who Prepare Their Returns Electronically but File Their Returns on

Paper to Print Their Returns with a Scannable Code ........................................ 227 Allow the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to Absorb Credit and Debit Card Processing

Fees for Certain Tax Payments........................................................................... 228 Provide the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with Greater Flexibility to Address

Correctable Errors.............................................................................................. 229 Make E-Filing Mandatory for Exempt Organizations .................................................... 231 Authorize the Department of the Treasury to Require Additional Information to be

Included in Electronically Filed Form 5500 Annual Reports and Electronic Filing of Certain Other Employee Benefit Plan Reports ............................................... 232

Impose a Penalty on Failure to Comply with Electronic Filing Requirements .............. 234 Provide Whistleblowers with Protection from Retaliation ............................................. 235 Provide Stronger Protection from Improper Disclosure of Taxpayer Information in

Whistleblower Actions ........................................................................................ 236 Index All Penalties For Inflation .................................................................................... 237 Extend Paid Preparer Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) Due Diligence Requirements to

the Child Tax Credit............................................................................................ 238 Extend Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Authority to Require a Truncated Social Security

Number (SSN) on Form W-2 ............................................................................... 239 Add Tax Crimes to the Aggravated Identity Theft Statute .............................................. 241 Impose a Civil Penalty on Tax Identity Theft Crimes ..................................................... 242 Allow States to Send Notices of Intent to Offset Federal Tax Refunds to Collect State Tax

Obligations by Regular First-Class Mail Instead of Certified Mail ................... 243 Explicitly Provide that the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service

(IRS) Have Authority to Regulate All Paid Return Preparers ............................ 244 Rationalize Tax Return Filing Due Dates So They Are Staggered ................................. 245 Increase the Penalty Applicable to Paid Tax Preparers Who Engage in Willful or

Reckless Conduct ............................................................................................... 247 Enhance Administrability of the Appraiser Penalty ....................................................... 248

SIMPLIFY THE TAX SYSTEM ......................................................................................... 249 Simplify the Rules for Claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for Workers

Without Qualifying Children............................................................................... 249 Modify Adoption Credit to Allow Tribal Determination of Special Needs ..................... 250 Simplify Minimum Required Distribution (MRD) Rules ................................................. 251

Page 10: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

vii

Allow All Inherited Plan and Individual Retirement Account or Annuity (IRA) balances to be Rolled Over Within 60 Days .......................................................................... 253

Repeal Non-Qualified Preferred Stock (NQPS) Designation ......................................... 255 Repeal Preferential Dividend Rule for Publicly Traded and Publicly Offered Real Estate

Investment Trusts (REITs)................................................................................... 256 Reform Excise Tax Based on Investment Income of Private Foundations ..................... 258 Remove Bonding Requirements for Certain Taxpayers Subject to Federal Excise Taxes

on Distilled Spirits, Wine, and Beer.................................................................... 259 Simplify Arbitrage Investment Restrictions .................................................................... 261 Simplify Single-Family Housing Mortgage Bond Targeting Requirements ................... 263 Streamline Private Business Limits on Governmental Bonds......................................... 264 Exclude Self-Constructed Assets of Small Taxpayers from the Uniform Capitalization

(UNICAP) Rules.................................................................................................. 265 Repeal Technical Terminations of Partnerships............................................................. 267 Repeal Anti-Churning Rules of Section 197 ................................................................... 268 Repeal Special Estimated Tax Payment Provision for Certain Insurance Companies .. 269 Repeal the Telephone Excise Tax ................................................................................... 271 Increase the Standard Mileage Rate for Automobile Use by Volunteers ....................... 272

USER FEE ............................................................................................................................. 273 Reform Inland Waterways Funding ................................................................................ 273

OTHER INITIATIVES ........................................................................................................ 274 Allow Offset of Federal Income Tax Refunds to Collect Delinquent State Income Taxes

for Out-of-State Residents ................................................................................... 274 Authorize the Limited Sharing of Business Tax Return Information to Improve the

Accuracy of Important Measures of the Economy .............................................. 275 Eliminate Certain Reviews Conducted by the U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax

Administration (TIGTA) ...................................................................................... 277 Modify Indexing to Prevent Deflationary Adjustments ................................................... 278

TABLES OF REVENUE ESTIMATES .......................................................... 279 Table 1: Revenue Estimates of Adjustments to the Balanced Budget and Emergency

Deficit Control Act (BBEDCA) Baseline............................................................ 279 Table 2: Revenue Estimates of Reserve for Long-Run Revenue-Neutral Business Tax

Reform Proposals................................................................................................ 280 Table 3: Revenue Estimates of FY 2015 Budget Proposals............................................ 282

Page 11: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

75

ELIMINATE FOSSIL FUEL PREFERENCES

Eliminate Oil and Natural Gas Preferences

REPEAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY (EOR) CREDIT Current Law The general business credit includes a 15-percent credit for eligible costs attributable to EOR projects. If the credit is claimed with respect to eligible costs, the taxpayer’s deduction (or basis increase) with respect to those costs is reduced by the amount of the credit. Eligible costs include the cost of constructing a gas treatment plant to prepare Alaska natural gas for pipeline transportation and any of the following costs with respect to a qualified EOR project: (1) the cost of depreciable or amortizable tangible property that is an integral part of the project; (2) intangible drilling and development costs that the taxpayer can elect to deduct; and (3) deductible tertiary injectant costs. A qualified EOR project must be located in the United States and must involve the application of one or more of nine listed tertiary recovery methods that can reasonably be expected to result in more than an insignificant increase in the amount of crude oil which ultimately will be recovered. The allowable credit is phased out over a $6 range for a taxable year if the annual average unregulated wellhead price per barrel of domestic crude oil during the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins (the reference price) exceeds an inflation adjusted threshold. The credit was completely phased out for taxable years beginning in 2011, because the reference price ($74.71) exceeded the inflation adjusted threshold ($42.91) by more than $6. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The credit, like other oil and gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the credit must ultimately be financed with taxes that result in other distortions, e.g., in reductions in investment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Proposal The proposal would repeal the investment tax credit for enhanced oil recovery projects for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 12: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

76

REPEAL CREDIT FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCED FROM MARGINAL WELLS Current Law The general business credit includes a credit for crude oil and natural gas produced from marginal wells. The credit rate is $3.00 per barrel of oil and 50 cents per 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas for taxable years beginning in 2005 and is adjusted for inflation in taxable years beginning after 2005. The credit is available for production from wells that produce oil and natural gas qualifying as marginal production for purposes of the percentage depletion rules or that have average daily production of not more than 25 barrel-of-oil equivalents and produce at least 95 percent water. The credit per well is limited to 1,095 barrels of oil or barrel-of-oil equivalents per year. The credit rate for crude oil is phased out for a taxable year if the annual average unregulated wellhead price per barrel of domestic crude oil during the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins (the reference price) exceeds the applicable threshold. The phase-out range and the applicable threshold at which phase-out begins are $3.00 and $15.00 for taxable years beginning in 2005 and are adjusted for inflation in taxable years beginning after 2005. The credit rate for natural gas is similarly phased out for a taxable year if the annual average wellhead price for domestic natural gas exceeds the applicable threshold. The phase-out range and the applicable threshold at which phase-out begins are 33 cents and $1.67 for taxable years beginning in 2005 and are adjusted for inflation in taxable years beginning after 2005. The credit has been completely phased out for all taxable years since its enactment. Unlike other components of the general business credit, which can be carried back only one year, the marginal well credit can be carried back up to five years. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The credit, like other oil and gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the credit must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g. underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Proposal The proposal would repeal the production tax credit for oil and natural gas from marginal wells for production in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 13: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

77

REPEAL EXPENSING OF INTANGIBLE DRILLING COSTS Current Law In general, costs that benefit future periods must be capitalized and recovered over such periods for income tax purposes, rather than being expensed in the period the costs are incurred. In addition, the uniform capitalization rules require certain direct and indirect costs allocable to property to be included in inventory or capitalized as part of the basis of such property. In general, the uniform capitalization rules apply to real and tangible personal property produced by the taxpayer or acquired for resale. Special rules apply to intangible drilling costs (IDCs). IDCs include all expenditures made by an operator (i.e., a person who holds a working or operating interest in any tract or parcel of land either as a fee owner or under a lease or any other form of contract granting working or operating rights) for wages, fuel, repairs, hauling, supplies, and other expenses incident to and necessary for the drilling of wells and the preparation of wells for the production of oil and natural gas. In addition, IDCs include the cost to operators of any drilling or development work (excluding amounts payable only out of production or gross or net proceeds from production, if the amounts are depletable income to the recipient, and amounts properly allocable to the cost of depreciable property) done by contractors under any form of contract (including a turnkey contract). IDCs include amounts paid for labor, fuel, repairs, hauling, and supplies which are used in the drilling, shooting, and cleaning of wells; in such clearing of ground, draining, road making, surveying, and geological works as are necessary in preparation for the drilling of wells; and in the construction of such derricks, tanks, pipelines, and other physical structures as are necessary for the drilling of wells and the preparation of wells for the production of oil and natural gas. Generally, IDCs do not include expenses for items which have a salvage value (such as pipes and casings) or items which are part of the acquisition price of an interest in the property. Under the special rules applicable to IDCs, an operator who pays or incurs IDCs in the development of an oil or natural gas property located in the United States may elect either to expense or capitalize those costs. The uniform capitalization rules do not apply to otherwise deductible IDCs. If a taxpayer elects to expense IDCs, the amount of the IDCs is deductible as an expense in the taxable year the cost is paid or incurred. Generally, IDCs that a taxpayer elects to capitalize may be recovered through depletion or depreciation, as appropriate; or in the case of a nonproductive well (“dry hole”), the operator may elect to deduct the costs. In the case of an integrated oil company (i.e., a company that engages, either directly or through a related enterprise, in substantial retailing or refining activities) that has elected to expense IDCs, 30 percent of the IDCs on productive wells must be capitalized and amortized over a 60-month period. A taxpayer that has elected to deduct IDCs may, nevertheless, elect to capitalize and amortize certain IDCs over a 60-month period beginning with the month the expenditure was paid or incurred. This rule applies on an expenditure-by-expenditure basis; that is, for any particular taxable year, a taxpayer may deduct some portion of its IDCs and capitalize the rest under this

Page 14: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

78

provision. This allows the taxpayer to reduce or eliminate IDC adjustments or preferences under the alternative minimum tax. The election to deduct IDCs applies only to those IDCs associated with domestic properties. For this purpose, the United States includes certain wells drilled offshore. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The expensing of IDCs, like other oil and gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the subsidy for oil and natural gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Capitalization of IDCs would place the oil and gas industry on a cost recovery system similar to that of other industries and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal expensing of IDCs and 60-month amortization of capitalized IDCs. IDCs would be capitalized as depreciable or depletable property, depending on the nature of the cost incurred, in accordance with the generally applicable rules. The proposal would be effective for costs paid or incurred after December 31, 2014.

Page 15: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

79

REPEAL DEDUCTION FOR TERTIARY INJECTANTS Current Law Taxpayers are allowed to deduct the cost of qualified tertiary injectant expenses for the taxable year. Qualified tertiary injectant expenses are amounts paid or incurred for any tertiary injectants (other than recoverable hydrocarbon injectants) that are used as a part of a tertiary recovery method to increase the recovery of crude oil. The deduction is treated as an amortization deduction in determining the amount subject to recapture upon disposition of the property. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The deduction for tertiary injectants, like other oil and natural gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for oil and gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Capitalization of tertiary injectants would place the oil and natural gas industry on a cost recovery system similar to that of other industries and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal the deduction for qualified tertiary injectant expenses for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2014.

Page 16: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

80

REPEAL EXCEPTION TO PASSIVE LOSS LIMITATION FOR WORKING INTERESTS IN OIL AND NATURAL GAS PROPERTIES Current Law The passive loss rules limit deductions and credits from passive trade or business activities. Deductions attributable to passive activities, to the extent they exceed income from passive activities, generally may not be deducted against other income, such as wages, portfolio income, or business income that is not derived from a passive activity. A similar rule applies to credits. Suspended deductions and credits are carried forward and treated as deductions and credits from passive activities in the next year. The suspended losses and credits from a passive activity are allowed in full when the taxpayer completely disposes of the activity. Passive activities are defined to include trade or business activities in which the taxpayer does not materially participate. An exception is provided, however, for any working interest in an oil or natural gas property that the taxpayer holds directly or through an entity that does not limit the liability of the taxpayer with respect to the interest. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The special tax treatment of working interests in oil and gas properties, like other oil and natural gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the working interest exception for oil and natural gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Eliminating the working interest exception would subject oil and natural gas properties to the same limitations as other activities and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal the exception from the passive loss rules for working interests in oil and natural gas properties for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 17: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

81

REPEAL PERCENTAGE DEPLETION FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS WELLS Current Law The capital costs of oil and natural gas wells are recovered through the depletion deduction. Under the cost depletion method, the basis recovery for a taxable year is proportional to the exhaustion of the property during the year. This method does not permit cost recovery deductions that exceed basis or that are allowable on an accelerated basis. A taxpayer may also qualify for percentage depletion with respect to oil and natural gas properties. The amount of the deduction is a statutory percentage of the gross income from the property. For oil and natural gas properties, the percentage ranges from 15 to 25 percent and the deduction may not exceed 100 percent of the taxable income from the property (determined before the deductions for depletion and domestic manufacturing). In addition, the percentage depletion deduction for oil and natural gas properties may not exceed 65 percent of the taxpayer’s overall taxable income (determined before the deduction for depletion and with certain other adjustments). Other limitations and special rules apply to the percentage depletion deduction for oil and natural gas properties. In general, only independent producers and royalty owners (in contrast to integrated oil companies) qualify for the percentage depletion deduction. In addition, oil and natural gas producers may claim percentage depletion only with respect to up to 1,000 barrels of average daily production of domestic crude oil or an equivalent amount of domestic natural gas (applied on a combined basis in the case of taxpayers that produce both). This quantity limitation is allocated, at the taxpayer’s election, between oil production and natural gas production and then further allocated within each class among the taxpayer’s properties. Special rules apply to oil and natural gas production from marginal wells (generally, wells for which the average daily production is less than 15 barrels of oil or barrel-of-oil equivalents or that produce only heavy oil). Only marginal well production can qualify for percentage depletion at a rate of more than 15 percent. The rate is increased in a taxable year that begins in a calendar year following a calendar year during which the annual average unregulated wellhead price per barrel of domestic crude oil is less than $20. The increase is one percentage point for each whole dollar of difference between the two amounts. In addition, marginal wells are exempt from the 100-percent-of-net-income limitation described above in taxable years beginning during the period 1998-2007 and in taxable years beginning during the period 2009-2011. Unless the taxpayer elects otherwise, marginal well production is given priority over other production in applying the 1,000-barrel limitation on percentage depletion. A qualifying taxpayer determines the depletion deduction for each oil and natural gas property under both the percentage depletion method and the cost depletion method and deducts the larger of the two amounts. Because percentage depletion is computed without regard to the taxpayer’s basis in the depletable property, a taxpayer may continue to claim percentage depletion after all the expenditures incurred to acquire and develop the property have been recovered.

Page 18: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

82

Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. Percentage depletion effectively provides a lower rate of tax with respect to a favored source of income. The lower rate of tax, like other oil and natural gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for oil and natural gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Cost depletion computed by reference to the taxpayer’s basis in the property is the equivalent of economic depreciation. Limiting oil and gas producers to cost depletion would place them on a cost recovery system similar to that of other industries and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal percentage depletion with respect to oil and natural gas wells. Taxpayers would be permitted to claim cost depletion on their adjusted basis, if any, in oil and natural gas wells. The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 19: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

83

REPEAL DOMESTIC MANUFACTURING DEDUCTION FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION

Current Law A deduction is allowed with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities (the manufacturing deduction). For taxable years beginning after 2009, the manufacturing deduction is generally equal to nine percent of the lesser of qualified production activities income for the taxable year or taxable income for the taxable year, limited to 50 percent of the W-2 wages of the taxpayer for the taxable year. The deduction for income from oil and natural gas production activities is computed at a six-percent rate. Qualified production activities income is generally calculated as a taxpayer’s domestic production gross receipts (i.e., the gross receipts derived from any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of qualifying production property manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted by the taxpayer in whole or significant part within the United States; any qualified film produced by the taxpayer; or electricity, natural gas, or potable water produced by the taxpayer in the United States) minus the cost of goods sold and other expenses, losses, or deductions attributable to such receipts. The manufacturing deduction generally is available to all taxpayers that generate qualified production activities income, which under current law includes income from the sale, exchange or disposition of oil, natural gas or primary products thereof produced in the United States. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The manufacturing deduction for oil and natural gas effectively provides a lower rate of tax with respect to a favored source of income. The lower rate of tax, like other oil and natural gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for oil and natural gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Proposal The proposal would retain the overall manufacturing deduction, but exclude from the definition of domestic production gross receipts all gross receipts derived from the sale, exchange or other disposition of oil, natural gas or a primary product thereof for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014. There is a parallel proposal to repeal the domestic manufacturing deduction for coal and other hard mineral fossil fuels.

Page 20: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

84

INCREASE GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL AMORTIZATION PERIOD FOR INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS TO SEVEN YEARS Current Law Geological and geophysical expenditures are costs incurred for the purpose of obtaining and accumulating data that will serve as the basis for the acquisition and retention of mineral properties. The amortization period for geological and geophysical expenditures incurred in connection with oil and natural gas exploration in the United States is two years for independent producers and seven years for integrated oil and natural gas producers. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The accelerated amortization of geological and geophysical expenditures incurred by independent producers, like other oil and natural gas preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in the oil and natural gas industry than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is detrimental to long-term energy security and is also inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy, reducing our reliance on oil, and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for oil and natural gas must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Increasing the amortization period for geological and geophysical expenditures incurred by independent oil and natural gas producers from two years to seven years would provide a more accurate reflection of their income and more consistent tax treatment for all oil and natural gas producers. Proposal The proposal would increase the amortization period from two years to seven years for geological and geophysical expenditures incurred by independent producers in connection with all oil and natural gas exploration in the United States. Seven-year amortization would apply even if the property is abandoned and any remaining basis of the abandoned property would be recovered over the remainder of the seven-year period. The proposal would be effective for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2014.

Page 21: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

85

Eliminate Coal Preferences

REPEAL EXPENSING OF EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS Current Law In general, costs that benefit future periods must be capitalized and recovered over such periods for income tax purposes, rather than being expensed in the period the costs are incurred. In addition, the uniform capitalization rules require certain direct and indirect costs allocable to property to be included in inventory or capitalized as part of the basis of such property. In general, the uniform capitalization rules apply to real and tangible personal property produced by the taxpayer or acquired for resale. Special rules apply in the case of mining exploration and development expenditures. A taxpayer may elect to expense the exploration costs incurred for the purpose of ascertaining the existence, location, extent, or quality of an ore or mineral deposit, including a deposit of coal or other hard-mineral fossil fuel. Exploration costs that are expensed are recaptured when the mine reaches the producing stage either by a reduction in depletion deductions or, at the election of the taxpayer, by an inclusion in income in the year in which the mine reaches the producing stage. After the existence of a commercially marketable deposit has been disclosed, costs incurred for the development of a mine to exploit the deposit are deductible in the year paid or incurred unless the taxpayer elects to deduct the costs on a ratable basis as the minerals or ores produced from the deposit are sold. In the case of a corporation that elects to deduct exploration costs in the year paid or incurred, 30 percent of the otherwise deductible costs must be capitalized and amortized over a 60-month period. In addition, a taxpayer that has elected to deduct exploration costs may, nevertheless, elect to capitalize and amortize those costs over a 10-year period. This rule applies on an expenditure-by-expenditure basis; that is, for any particular taxable year, a taxpayer may deduct some portion of its exploration costs and capitalize the rest under this provision. This allows the taxpayer to reduce or eliminate adjustments or preferences for exploration costs under the alternative minimum tax. Similar rules limiting corporate deductions and providing for 60-month and 10-year amortization apply with respect to mine development costs. The election to deduct exploration costs and the rule making development costs deductible in the year paid or incurred apply only with respect to domestic ore and mineral deposits. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The expensing of exploration and development costs relating to coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels, like other fossil-fuel preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in fossil-fuel production than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy

Page 22: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

86

and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Capitalization of exploration and development costs relating to coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels would place taxpayers in that industry on a cost recovery system similar to that employed by other industries and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal expensing, 60-month amortization, and 10-year amortization of exploration and development costs with respect to coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels. The costs would be capitalized as depreciable or depletable property, depending on the nature of the cost incurred, in accordance with the generally applicable rules. The other hard-mineral fossil fuels for which expensing, 60-month amortization, and 10-year amortization would not be allowed include lignite and oil shale to which a 15-percent depletion rate applies. The proposal would be effective for costs paid or incurred after December 31, 2014.

Page 23: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

87

REPEAL PERCENTAGE DEPLETION FOR HARD MINERAL FOSSIL FUELS Current Law The capital costs of coal mines and other hard-mineral fossil-fuel properties are recovered through the depletion deduction. Under the cost depletion method, the basis recovery for a taxable year is proportional to the exhaustion of the property during the year. This method does not permit cost recovery deductions that exceed basis or that are allowable on an accelerated basis. A taxpayer may also qualify for percentage depletion with respect to coal and other hard-mineral fossil-fuel properties. The amount of the deduction is a statutory percentage of the gross income from the property. The percentage is 10 percent for coal and lignite and 15 percent for oil shale (other than oil shale to which a 7½-percent depletion rate applies because it is used for certain nonfuel purposes). The deduction may not exceed 50 percent of the taxable income from the property (determined before the deductions for depletion and domestic manufacturing). A qualifying taxpayer determines the depletion deduction for each property under both the percentage depletion method and the cost depletion method and deducts the larger of the two amounts. Because percentage depletion is computed without regard to the taxpayer’s basis in the depletable property, a taxpayer may continue to claim percentage depletion after all the expenditures incurred to acquire and develop the property have been recovered. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. Percentage depletion effectively provides a lower rate of tax with respect to a favored source of income. The lower rate of tax, like other fossil-fuel preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in fossil-fuel production than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Cost depletion computed by reference to the taxpayer’s basis in the property is the equivalent of economic depreciation. Limiting fossil-fuel producers to cost depletion would place them on a cost recovery system similar to that of other industries and reduce economic distortions. Proposal The proposal would repeal percentage depletion with respect to coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels. The other hard-mineral fossil fuels for which no percentage depletion would be allowed include lignite and oil shale to which a 15-percent depletion rate applies. Taxpayers

Page 24: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

88

would be permitted to claim cost depletion on their adjusted basis, if any, in coal and other hard-mineral fossil-fuel properties. The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 25: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

89

REPEAL CAPITAL GAINS TREATMENT FOR ROYALTIES Current Law Royalties received on the disposition of coal or lignite generally qualify for treatment as long-term capital gain, and the royalty owner does not qualify for percentage depletion with respect to the coal or lignite. This treatment does not apply unless the taxpayer has been the owner of the mineral in place for at least one year before it is mined. The treatment also does not apply to income realized as a co-adventurer, partner, or principal in the mining of the mineral or to certain related-party transactions. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The capital gain treatment of coal and lignite royalties, like other fossil-fuel preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in fossil-fuel production than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for coal and lignite must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Proposal The proposal would repeal capital gains treatment of coal and lignite royalties and would tax those royalties as ordinary income. The proposal would be effective for amounts realized in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 26: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

90

REPEAL DOMESTIC MANUFACTURING DEDUCTION FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COAL AND OTHER HARD MINERAL FOSSIL FUELS

Current Law A deduction is allowed with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities (the manufacturing deduction). For taxable years beginning after 2009, the manufacturing deduction is generally equal to nine percent of the lesser of qualified production activities income for the taxable year or taxable income for the taxable year, limited to 50 percent of the W-2 wages of the taxpayer for the taxable year. Qualified production activities income is generally calculated as a taxpayer’s domestic production gross receipts (i.e., the gross receipts derived from any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of qualifying production property manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted by the taxpayer in whole or significant part within the United States; any qualified film produced by the taxpayer; or electricity, natural gas, or potable water produced by the taxpayer in the United States) minus the cost of goods sold and other expenses, losses, or deductions attributable to such receipts. The manufacturing deduction generally is available to all taxpayers that generate qualified production activities income, which under current law includes income from the sale, exchange or disposition of coal, other hard-mineral fossil fuels, or primary products thereof produced in the United States. Reasons for Change The President agreed at the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels so that the United States can transition to a 21st-century energy economy. The manufacturing deduction for coal and other hard mineral fossil fuels effectively provides a lower rate of tax with respect to a favored source of income. The lower rate of tax, like other fossil-fuel preferences the Administration proposes to repeal, distorts markets by encouraging more investment in fossil-fuel production than would occur under a neutral system. This market distortion is inconsistent with the Administration’s policy of supporting a clean energy economy and cutting carbon pollution. Moreover, the tax subsidy for coal and other hard-mineral fossil fuels must ultimately be financed with taxes that cause other economic distortions, e.g., underinvestment in other, potentially more productive, areas of the economy. Proposal The proposal would retain the overall manufacturing deduction, but exclude from the definition of domestic production gross receipts all gross receipts derived from the sale, exchange or other disposition of coal, other hard-mineral fossil fuels, or a primary product thereof. The hard mineral fossil fuels to which the exclusion would apply include lignite and oil shale to which a 15-percent depletion rate applies. There is a parallel proposal to repeal the domestic manufacturing deduction for oil and natural gas companies. The proposal would be effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.

Page 27: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

98

EXPAND THE DEFINITION OF SUBSTANTIAL BUILT-IN LOSS FOR PURPOSES OF PARTNERSHIP LOSS TRANSFERS Current Law Under section 743(b), a partnership does not adjust the basis of partnership property following the transfer of a partnership interest unless the partnership has made an election under section 754 to make basis adjustments or the partnership has a substantial built-in loss. If an election is in effect or the partnership has a substantial built-in loss, adjustments are made with respect to the transferee partner to account for the difference between the transferee partner’s proportionate share of the adjusted basis of the partnership property and the transferee’s basis in its partnership interest. These adjustments are intended to adjust the basis of partnership property to approximate the result of a direct purchase of the property by the transferee partner. Prior to 2004, section 743(b) applied only if the partnership made an election under section 754. To prevent the duplication of losses, Congress amended section 743 to mandate section 743(b) adjustments if the partnership had a substantial built-in loss in its assets. Section 743(d) defines a substantial built-in loss by reference to the partnership’s adjusted basis – that is, there is a substantial built-in loss if the partnership’s adjusted basis in its assets exceeds by more than $250,000 the fair market value of such property. Reasons for Change Although the 2004 amendments to section 743 prevent the duplication of losses where the partnership has a substantial built-in loss in its assets, it does not prevent the duplication of losses where the transferee partner would be allocated a net loss in excess of $250,000 if the partnership sold all of its assets in a fully taxable transaction for fair market value, but the partnership itself does not have a substantial built-in loss in its assets. Proposal The proposal would amend section 743(d) to also measure a substantial built-in loss by reference to whether the transferee would be allocated a net loss in excess of $250,000 upon a hypothetical disposition by the partnership of all of the partnership’s assets, immediately after the transfer of the partnership interest, in a full taxable transaction for cash equal to the fair market value of the assets. The proposal would apply to sales or exchanges after the date of enactment.

Page 28: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

99

EXTEND PARTNERSHIP BASIS LIMITATION RULES TO NONDEDUCTIBLE EXPENDITURES Current Law Section 704(d) provides that a partner’s distributive share of loss is allowed only to the extent of the partner’s adjusted basis in its partnership interest at the end of the partnership year in which such loss occurred. Any excess is allowed as a deduction at the end of the partnership year in which the partner has sufficient basis in its partnership interest to take the deductions. Section 704(d) does not apply to partnership expenditures not deductible in computing partnership taxable income and not properly chargeable to capital account. Reasons for Change Even though a partner’s distributive share of nondeductible expenditures reduces the partner’s basis in its partnership interest, such items are not subject to section 704(d), and the partner may deduct or credit them currently even if the partner’s basis in its partnership interest is zero. Proposal The proposal would amend section 704(d) to allow a partner’s distributive share of expenditures not deductible in computing the partnership’s taxable income and not properly chargeable to capital account only to the extent of the partner’s adjusted basis in its partnership interest at the end of the partnership year in which such expenditure occurred. The proposal would apply to a partnership’s taxable year beginning on or after the date of enactment.

Page 29: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

107

BUDGET PROPOSALS

The Administration’s proposals, which begin the process of reducing the deficit and reforming the Internal Revenue Code, will strengthen the economy and provide support to middle-income families. These proposals provide support for job creation and incentives for investment in infrastructure, help make work pay by expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit for workers without qualifying children, and help families save for retirement and pay for college and child care. They also reduce the deficit and make the tax system fairer by eliminating a number of tax loopholes and reducing tax benefits for higher-income taxpayers. The Administration’s proposals that affect receipts are described below.

Page 30: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

177

LOOPHOLE CLOSERS

TAX CARRIED (PROFITS) INTERESTS AS ORDINARY INCOME Current Law A partnership is not subject to Federal income tax. Instead, an item of income or loss of the partnership retains its character and flows through to the partners, who must include such item on their tax returns. Generally, certain partners receive partnership interests in exchange for contributions of cash and/or property, while certain partners (not necessarily other partners) receive partnership interests, typically interests in future profits (“profits interests” or “carried interests”), in exchange for services. Accordingly, if and to the extent a partnership recognizes long-term capital gain, the partners, including partners who provide services, will reflect their shares of such gain on their tax returns as long-term capital gain. If the partner is an individual, such gain would be taxed at the reduced rates for long-term capital gains. Gain recognized on the sale of a partnership interest, whether it was received in exchange for property, cash, or services, is generally treated as capital gain. Under current law, income attributable to a profits interest of a general partner is generally subject to self-employment tax, except to the extent the partnership generates types of income that are excluded from self-employment taxes, e.g., capital gains, certain interest, and dividends. Reasons for Change Although profits interests are structured as partnership interests, the income allocable to such interests is received in connection with the performance of services. A service provider’s share of the income of a partnership attributable to a carried interest should be taxed as ordinary income and subject to self-employment tax because such income is derived from the performance of services. By allowing service partners to receive capital gains treatment on labor income without limit, the current system creates an unfair and inefficient tax preference. The recent explosion of activity among large private equity firms and hedge funds has increased the breadth and cost of this tax preference, with some of the highest-income Americans benefiting from the preferential treatment. Proposal The proposal would tax as ordinary income a partner’s share of income on an “investment services partnership interest” (ISPI) in an investment partnership, regardless of the character of the income at the partnership level. Accordingly, such income would not be eligible for the reduced rates that apply to long-term capital gains. In addition, the proposal would require the partner to pay self-employment taxes on such income. In order to prevent income derived from labor services from avoiding taxation at ordinary income rates, this proposal assumes that the gain recognized on the sale of an ISPI would generally be taxed as ordinary income, not as capital gain. To ensure more consistent treatment with the sales of other types of businesses, the Administration remains committed to working with Congress to develop mechanisms to assure

Page 31: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

178

the proper amount of income recharacterization where the business has goodwill or other assets unrelated to the services of the ISPI holder. An ISPI is a carried interest in an investment partnership that is held by a person who provides services to the partnership. A partnership is an investment partnership if substantially all of its assets are investment-type assets (certain securities, real estate, interests in partnerships, commodities, cash or cash equivalents, or derivative contracts with respect to those assets), but only if over half of the partnership’s contributed capital is from partners in whose hands the interests constitute property not held in connection with a trade or business. To the extent (1) the partner who holds an ISPI contributes “invested capital” (which is generally money or other property) to the partnership, and (2) such partner’s invested capital is a qualified capital interest (which generally requires that (a) the partnership allocations to the invested capital be in a same manner as allocations to other capital interests held by partners who do not hold an ISPI and (b) the allocations to these non-ISPI holders are significant), income attributable to the invested capital would not be recharacterized. Similarly, the portion of any gain recognized on the sale of an ISPI that is attributable to the invested capital would be treated as capital gain. However, “invested capital” will not include contributed capital that is attributable to the proceeds of any loan or other advance made or guaranteed by any partner or the partnership. Also, any person who performs services for an entity and holds a “disqualified interest” in the entity is subject to tax at rates applicable to ordinary income on any income or gain received with respect to the interest. A “disqualified interest” is defined as convertible or contingent debt, an option, or any derivative instrument with respect to the entity (but does not include a partnership interest, stock in certain taxable corporations, or stock in an S corporation). This is an anti-abuse rule designed to prevent the avoidance of the proposal through the use of compensatory arrangements other than partnership interests. Other anti-abuse rules may be necessary. The proposal is not intended to adversely affect qualification of a real estate investment trust owning a carried interest in a real estate partnership. The proposal would be effective for taxable years ending after December 31, 2014.

Page 32: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

217

STREAMLINE AUDIT AND ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURES FOR LARGE PARTNERSHIPS Current Law The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) established unified audit rules applicable to all but certain small partnerships. These rules require the tax treatment of all “partnership items” to be determined at the partnership, rather than the partner, level. The rules also require a partner to report all partnership items consistently with the partnership return, unless the partner notifies the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of any inconsistency. The IRS may challenge the reporting position of a partnership by conducting a single administrative proceeding to resolve the issue with respect to all partners. Nevertheless, the IRS must still assess any resulting adjustment against each of the taxpayers who were partners in the year in which the misstatement of tax liability arose. In addition, any partner can request an administrative adjustment or a refund for his own separate tax liability and participate in partnership-level administrative proceedings. The TEFRA partnership rules also require the IRS to give notice of the beginning of partnership-level administrative proceedings and any resulting administrative adjustment to all partners whose names and addresses are furnished to the IRS. For partnerships with more than 100 partners, however, the IRS generally is not required to give notice to any partner whose profits interest is less than one percent. Because “[the TEFRA] audit and adjustment procedures for large partnerships are inefficient and more complex than those for other large entities,”1 the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 established streamlined audit and adjustment procedure, as well as a simplified reporting system, for electing large partnerships (ELPs), which are generally defined as partnerships that have 100 or more partners during the preceding taxable year and elect to be treated as an ELP. Under the streamlined ELP audit and adjustment procedures, the IRS generally makes adjustments at the partnership level that flow through to the partners for the year in which the adjustment takes effect. Thus, the current-year partners’ share of current-year partnership items of income, gains, losses, deductions, or credits are adjusted to reflect partnership adjustments that take effect in that year. The adjustments generally will not affect prior-year returns of any partners (except in the case of changes to any partner’s distributive shares). Unlike the TEFRA partnership rules, only the partnership can request a refund and the partners of an ELP do not have the right to participate in partnership-level administrative proceedings. Under the ELP audit rules, the IRS need not give notice to individual partners of the beginning of an administrative proceeding or of a final adjustment. Instead, a notice of partnership adjustments is generally sent to the partnership, and only the partner designated by the partnership may act on behalf of the partnership. In addition, the ELP regime allows for simplified reporting to the IRS.

1 House Conference Report No. 105-220.

Page 33: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

218

Reasons for Change The present TEFRA partnership audit and adjustment procedures for large partnerships remain inefficient and more complex than those applicable to other large entities. Although the ELP regime was enacted to mitigate the problem, few large partnerships have elected into the ELP regime. In addition, there has been substantial growth in the number and complexity of large partnerships, magnifying the difficulty of auditing large partnerships under the TEFRA partnership procedures. Proposal The proposal would mandate the streamlined ELP audit and adjustment procedures, but not the simplified reporting, for any partnership that has 1,000 or more partners at any time during the taxable year, a “Required Large Partnership” (RLP).

An RLP, like an ELP, would not include any partnership if substantially all the partners are: (1) individuals performing substantial services in connection with the partnership’s activities, or personal service corporations the owner-employees of which perform those services; (2) retired partners who had performed those services; or (3) spouses of partners who had performed those services. An RLP will continue to be treated as an RLP unless it can demonstrate that the number of partners fell below the 1,000 partner threshold for the 60-month period ending with the last day of its most recently ended taxable year. An RLP, however, may elect to continue to be an RLP. In addition, a partnership that has 100 or more partners at any time during the taxable year may elect to be an RLP. If a partnership makes an election provided for in the prior two sentences, the election cannot be revoked for any year without the consent of the Secretary. For purposes of determining whether a partnership has 1,000 or more partners, any person that owns an interest directly or indirectly in the partnership through one or more pass-thru partners (as defined in section 6231(a)(9)) is treated as a partner. The proposal would require any partnership, estate, trust, S corporation, nominee, or other similar person (“pass-through person”) that owns a direct interest in another pass-through person (“lower-tier pass-through person”) to provide to the lower-tier pass-through person the information necessary for the lower-tier pass-through person to determine the number of owners that the pass-through person has. A pass-through person and a lower-tier pass-through person may agree that the pass-through person need not provide the above information to the lower-tier pass-through person if the parties determine the information is not necessary to determine that the lower-tier partnership has 1,000 or more partners. The partnership would be required to certify that it had at least 1,000 partners at some time during the taxable year by filing an RLP return. The treatment provided by the certification would be binding on the partnership, all partners of the partnership, and on the IRS. Thus, if a partnership incorrectly filed an RLP return, the RLP procedures would continue to apply for that taxable year. Conversely, if a partnership incorrectly failed to file an RLP return, the TEFRA partnership audit procedures would continue to apply to the partnership for that taxable year.

Page 34: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

219

The proposal, however, would provide that if a partnership incorrectly failed to file an RLP return, the period of limitations on assessment would not expire before the date that is three years after the date that the Secretary determined that an RLP return should have been filed. This would allow the IRS sufficient time to carry out the TEFRA partnership procedures. In addition, the partnership would be treated as an RLP for the partnership’s taxable year ending on or after the date the Secretary determines and notifies the partnership that an RLP return should have been filed. For example, if on June 1, 2016, the Secretary determines and notifies a calendar-year partnership that it incorrectly failed to file an RLP return for its 2014 taxable year, the partnership would be treated as an RLP for its taxable year ending December 31, 2016. If a partnership incorrectly failed to file the proper return, a penalty will be imposed on the partnership equal to the product of $5,000 multiplied by the number of direct and indirect partners of the partnership. The partnership would be liable for any penalty imposed by this provision. No penalty will be imposed if the partnership establishes that there was reasonable cause for, and the partnership acted in good faith with respect to, incorrectly failing to file the proper return. The proposal would also make simplifying changes to the existing ELP regime. The proposal would eliminate the requirement that an ELP provide information returns to its partners within 2½ months following the close of its taxable year and, instead, require the information returns be provided by the time required for non-ELP partnerships. Additionally, the definition of an ELP would be amended to provide that the number of persons who were partners in the partnership must equal or exceed 100 at any time during the partnership taxable year, as opposed to in the preceding partnership taxable year. The proposal would allow the Secretary to promulgate regulations to further define these rules, including rules to ensure that taxpayers do not transfer partnership interests with a principal purpose of utilizing the RLP regime to alter the taxpayers’ aggregate tax liability, and rules to address foreign pass-through partners including, where appropriate, treating a foreign pass-through partner that is a partnership as an RLP. The proposal would apply to a partnership’s taxable year ending on or after the date that is two years from the date of enactment.

Page 35: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

245

RATIONALIZE TAX RETURN FILING DUE DATES SO THEY ARE STAGGERED Current Law Individuals are generally required to file their income tax returns by April 15 of the year following the close of the taxable year. An individual may request a six-month extension of time to file his or her income tax return. Calendar year corporations (i.e., corporations with a tax year ending on December 31), including S corporations, are required to file their income tax returns by March 15 of the year following the close of the taxable year. Fiscal year corporations (i.e., corporations with a tax year ending on a date other than December 31), including S corporations, are required to file their income tax returns by the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year. Corporations may request an automatic six-month extension of time to file their income tax returns. In addition, corporations classified as S corporations are required to provide shareholders with a copy of the Schedule K-1 by the due date (including extensions) of the S corporation’s income tax return. Calendar year partnerships are required to file the Form 1065 with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and furnish a copy of the Schedule K-1 to each partner by April 15 of the year following the close of the taxable year. For fiscal year partnerships, the due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year. Partnerships may request an automatic five-month extension of time to file the Form 1065 and furnish copies of the Schedule K-1 to partners. Most information returns, including Forms 1099, 1098, and 1096, are required to be filed with the IRS by February 28 of the year following the year for which the information is being reported. Form W-2 is required to be filed with the Social Security Administration (SSA) by the last day of February. A copy of the information filed with the IRS is generally required to be furnished to payees by January 31 of the year following the year for which the information is being reported. In the case of payments reported on the Form 1099-B, statements to payees are required to be furnished by February 15, rather than January 31. The due date for filing information returns with the IRS or SSA is generally extended until March 31 if the returns are filed electronically. Reasons for Change Third-party information is used by taxpayers to assist them in preparing their income tax returns. However, many taxpayers do not receive Schedules K-1 before their income tax returns are due. As a result, taxpayers may not have accurate information when they file their income tax returns. Accelerating the taxpayer’s receipt of third-party information will reduce burden on taxpayers by providing them with accurate information when preparing their original returns and potentially reduce the number of amended returns filed by taxpayers.

Page 36: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

246

The IRS also uses third-party information to determine a taxpayer’s compliance with federal tax obligations. Accelerating the IRS’s receipt of third-party information will facilitate detection of non-compliance earlier in the filing season. Proposal The proposal would rationalize income tax return due dates so that taxpayers receive Schedules K-1 before the due date for filing their income tax returns. Under the proposal, calendar year S corporation filing deadlines would remain the same, and partnership filing deadlines would be made to conform to the current deadlines imposed on S corporations. Accordingly, all calendar year partnership and all calendar year S corporation returns (Forms 1065 and 1120-S) and Schedules K-1 furnished to partners and shareholders would be due March 15. In addition, returns of calendar year corporations other than S corporations would be due April 15 instead of March 15. The proposal would also accelerate the due date for filing information returns and eliminate the extended due date for electronically filed returns. Under the proposal, information returns would be required to be filed with the IRS (or SSA, in the case of Form W-2) by January 31, except that Form 1099-B would be required to be filed with the IRS by February 15. The due dates for the payee statements would remain the same. The proposal would be effective for returns required to be filed after December 31, 2014.

Page 37: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

267

REPEAL TECHNICAL TERMINATIONS OF PARTNERSHIPS Current Law Under section 707(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, if within a 12-month period, there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in partnership capital and profits, the partnership is treated as having terminated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Reasons for Change A termination of this kind is commonly referred to as a “technical termination” because the termination occurs solely for U.S. federal income tax purposes, even though the entity continues to exist for local law purposes and the business of the partnership continues. Even though the business of the partnership continues in the same legal form, several unanticipated consequences occur as a result of a technical termination, including, among other things, the restart of section 168 depreciation lives, the close of the partnership’s taxable year, and the loss of all partnership level elections. Accordingly, this rule currently serves as a trap for the unwary taxpayer or as an affirmative planning tool for the savvy taxpayer. Proposal The proposal would repeal section 708(b)(1)(B) effective for transfers on or after December 31, 2014.

Page 38: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

TA

BL

ES

OF

RE

VE

NU

E E

STIM

AT

ES

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Adj

ustm

ents

to th

e B

BED

CA

Bas

elin

ePe

rman

ently

ext

end

incr

ease

d re

fund

abilit

y of

the

Chi

ld T

ax C

redi

t 1/

00

00

-535

-10,

688

-10,

660

-10,

705

-10,

732

-10,

769

-10,

810

-11,

223

-64,

899

Perm

anen

tly e

xten

d Ea

rned

Inco

me

Tax

Cre

dit (

EITC

) mar

riage

pen

alty

relie

f 1/

00

00

-109

-1,4

50-1

,466

-1,4

88-1

,514

-1,5

44-1

,568

-1,5

59-9

,139

Perm

anen

tly e

xten

d th

e EI

TC fo

r lar

ger f

amilie

s 1/

0

00

0-1

02-1

,932

-1,9

61-1

,997

-2,0

35-2

,075

-2,1

15-2

,034

-12,

217

Perm

anen

tly e

xten

d th

e Am

eric

an O

ppor

tuni

ty T

ax C

redi

t (AO

TC) 1

/ 0

00

0-6

59-9

,795

-11,

939

-11,

752

-11,

489

-10,

947

-10,

726

-10,

454

-67,

307

Tota

l, A

djus

tmen

ts to

the

BB

EDC

A B

asel

ine

00

00

-1,4

05-2

3,86

5-2

6,02

6-2

5,94

2-2

5,77

0-2

5,33

5-2

5,21

9-2

5,27

0-1

53,5

62To

tal r

ecei

pt e

ffect

0

00

0-7

52-7

,919

-7,4

27-7

,282

-7,0

50-6

,554

-6,3

74-8

,671

-43,

358

Tota

l out

lay

effe

ct

00

00

653

15,9

4618

,599

18,6

6018

,720

18,7

8118

,845

16,5

9911

0,20

4

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Tre

asur

y

Not

es:

1/Th

is p

rovi

sion

affe

cts

both

rece

ipts

and

out

lays

. Th

e co

mbi

ned

effe

cts

are

show

n he

re a

nd th

e ou

tlay

effe

cts

incl

uded

in th

ese

estim

ates

are

det

aile

d in

the

tabl

e be

low

.

Perm

anen

tly e

xten

d in

crea

sed

refu

ndab

ility

of th

e C

hild

Tax

Cre

dit

00

00

535

10,6

8810

,660

10,7

0510

,732

10,7

6910

,810

11,2

2364

,899

Pe

rman

ently

ext

end

EITC

mar

riage

pen

alty

relie

f 0

00

023

9397

103

111

117

122

116

666

Pe

rman

ently

ext

end

the

EITC

for l

arge

r fam

ilies

00

00

951,

905

1,93

21,

965

2,00

02,

037

2,07

52,

000

12,0

09

Perm

anen

tly e

xten

d th

e AO

TC

00

00

03

260

591

05

887

587

75

858

583

83

260

3263

0

Tot

al o

utla

y ef

fect

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…..…

..……

……

…0

00

065

315

,946

18,5

9918

,660

18,7

2018

,781

18,8

4516

,599

110,

204

Tabl

e 1:

Rev

enue

Est

imat

es o

f Adj

ustm

ents

to th

e B

alan

ced

Bud

get a

nd E

mer

genc

y D

efic

it C

ontr

ol A

ct (B

BED

CA)

Bas

elin

e

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)

279

Page 39: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Ince

ntiv

es fo

r man

ufac

turin

g, re

sear

ch, c

lean

ene

rgy,

and

inso

urci

ng a

nd c

reat

ing

jobs

Prov

ide

tax

ince

ntiv

es fo

r loc

atin

g jo

bs a

nd b

usin

ess

activ

ity in

the

Uni

ted

Stat

es a

nd

rem

ove

tax

dedu

ctio

ns fo

r shi

ppin

g jo

bs o

vers

eas

0-1

4-1

8-1

9-2

1-2

1-2

2-2

3-2

4-2

4-2

6-9

3-2

12En

hanc

e an

d m

ake

perm

anen

t the

Res

earc

h an

d Ex

perim

enta

tion

Tax

Cre

dit

-3,2

59-6

,524

-7,7

31-8

,671

-9,5

91-1

0,48

3-1

1,30

9-1

2,14

8-1

3,01

9-1

3,89

4-1

4,77

6-4

3,00

0-1

08,1

46Ex

tend

and

mod

ify c

erta

in e

mpl

oym

ent t

ax c

redi

ts, i

nclu

ding

ince

ntiv

es fo

r hiri

ng

vete

rans

-3

82-7

47-8

21-8

85-9

28-9

64-9

94-1

,029

-1,0

72-1

,115

-1,1

59-4

,345

-9,7

14M

odify

and

per

man

ently

ext

end

the

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Pro

duct

ion

Tax

Cre

dit 3

/ 0

-141

-499

-848

-1,1

93-1

,584

-2,0

02-2

,458

-2,9

63-3

,509

-4,0

89-4

,265

-19,

286

Mod

ify a

nd p

erm

anen

tly e

xten

d th

e de

duct

ion

for e

nerg

y-ef

ficie

nt c

omm

erci

al b

uild

ing

pr

oper

ty

-61

-190

-371

-515

-607

-675

-720

-738

-745

-751

-756

-2,3

58-6

,068

S

ubto

tal,

ince

ntiv

es fo

r man

ufac

turin

g, re

sear

ch, c

lean

ene

rgy,

and

inso

urci

ng

a

nd c

reat

ing

jobs

-3

,702

-7,6

16-9

,440

-10,

938

-12,

340

-13,

727

-15,

047

-16,

396

-17,

823

-19,

293

-20,

806

-54,

061

-143

,426

Tax

relie

f for

sm

all b

usin

ess

Exte

nd in

crea

sed

expe

nsin

g fo

r sm

all b

usin

ess

-6,7

12-9

,321

-7,1

97-6

,246

-5,5

63-4

,981

-4,7

03-4

,586

-4,6

22-4

,735

-4,8

74-3

3,30

8-5

6,82

8El

imin

ate

capi

tal g

ains

taxa

tion

on in

vest

men

ts in

sm

all b

usin

ess

stoc

k 0

00

00

-227

-719

-1,2

45-1

,762

-2,3

10-2

,939

-227

-9,2

02In

crea

se th

e lim

itatio

ns fo

r ded

uctib

le n

ew b

usin

ess

expe

nditu

res

and

cons

olid

ate

pr

ovis

ions

for s

tart-

up a

nd o

rgan

izat

iona

l exp

endi

ture

s 0

-360

-449

-446

-440

-434

-431

-428

-427

-424

-419

-2,1

29-4

,258

Expa

nd a

nd s

impl

ify th

e ta

x cr

edit

prov

ided

to q

ualif

ied

smal

l em

ploy

ers

for n

on-e

lect

ive

co

ntrib

utio

ns to

em

ploy

ee h

ealth

insu

ranc

e 3/

-2

19-3

13-3

22-2

19-1

33-9

5-6

6-5

2-5

0-4

8-2

8-1

082

-132

6

Sub

tota

l, ta

x re

lief f

or s

mal

l bus

ines

s ...

-6,9

31-9

,994

-7,9

68-6

,911

-6,1

36-5

,737

-5,9

19-6

,311

-6,8

61-7

,517

-8,2

60-3

6,74

6-7

1,61

4

Ince

ntiv

es to

pro

mot

e re

gion

al g

row

thM

odify

and

per

man

ently

ext

end

the

New

Mar

kets

Tax

Cre

dit

-17

-77

-191

-351

-548

-772

-1,0

13-1

,245

-1,4

29-1

,529

-1,5

58-1

,939

-8,7

13R

estru

ctur

e as

sist

ance

to N

ew Y

ork

City

, pro

vide

tax

ince

ntiv

es fo

r tra

nspo

rtatio

n

infra

stru

ctur

e 0

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-200

-1,0

00-2

,000

Ref

orm

and

exp

and

the

Low

-Inco

me

Hou

sing

Tax

Cre

dit (

LIH

TC):

Allo

w c

onve

rsio

n of

priv

ate

activ

ity b

ond

volu

me

cap

into

LIH

TCs

00

-20

-40

-70

-90

-110

-120

-130

-140

-140

-220

-860

Enco

urag

e m

ixed

inco

me

occu

panc

y by

allo

win

g LI

HTC

-sup

porte

d pr

ojec

ts to

ele

ct a

cr

iterio

n em

ploy

ing

a re

stric

tion

on a

vera

ge in

com

e N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctC

hang

e fo

rmul

as fo

r 70

perc

ent P

V an

d 30

per

cent

PV

LIH

TCs

0-3

-5-7

-7-7

-7-7

-7-7

-7-2

9-6

4Ad

d pr

eser

vatio

n of

fede

rally

ass

iste

d af

ford

able

hou

sing

to a

lloca

tion

crite

ria

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Mak

e th

e LI

HTC

ben

efic

ial t

o re

al e

stat

e in

vest

men

t tru

sts

0-2

5-4

1-4

9-5

0-5

0-5

1-5

1-5

1-4

9-4

9-2

15-4

66Im

plem

ent r

equi

rem

ent t

hat L

IHTC

-sup

porte

d ho

usin

g pr

otec

t vic

tims

of d

omes

tic a

buse

N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ct

Subt

otal

, ref

orm

and

exp

and

LIH

TC …

……

……

……

...…

……

……

……

……

……

…0

-28

-66

-96

-127

-147

-168

-178

-188

-196

-196

-464

-1,3

90

Sub

tota

l, in

cent

ives

to p

rom

ote

regi

onal

gro

wth

-1

7-3

05-4

57-6

47-8

75-1

,119

-1,3

81-1

,623

-1,8

17-1

,925

-1,9

54-3

,403

-12,

103

Ref

orm

U.S

. int

erna

tiona

l tax

sys

tem

Def

er d

educ

tion

of in

tere

st e

xpen

se re

late

d to

def

erre

d in

com

e of

fore

ign

subs

idia

ries

02,

976

5,02

85,

219

5,44

45,

651

5,86

44,

051

2,85

02,

962

3,09

324

,318

43,1

38D

eter

min

e th

e Fo

reig

n Ta

x C

redi

t on

a po

olin

g ba

sis

...0

3,96

36,

697

6,95

27,

251

7,52

77,

810

8,11

58,

436

8,76

69,

155

32,3

9074

,672

Tax

curr

ently

exc

ess

retu

rns

asso

ciat

ed w

ith tr

ansf

ers

of in

tang

ible

s of

fsho

re

01,

578

2,69

32,

787

2,83

22,

798

2,71

82,

664

2,63

62,

626

2,63

312

,688

25,9

65Li

mit

shift

ing

of in

com

e th

roug

h in

tang

ible

pro

perty

tran

sfer

s 0

7113

717

220

724

428

332

537

342

748

983

12,

728

Dis

allo

w th

e de

duct

ion

for e

xces

s no

n-ta

xed

rein

sura

nce

prem

ium

s pa

id to

affi

liate

s 0

366

632

682

721

755

794

833

882

928

975

3,15

67,

568

Res

trict

ded

uctio

ns fo

r exc

essi

ve in

tere

st o

f mem

bers

of f

inan

cial

repo

rting

gro

ups

01,

944

3,43

43,

778

4,15

64,

571

5,02

85,

531

6,08

46,

693

7,36

217

,883

48,5

81M

odify

tax

rule

s fo

r dua

l cap

acity

taxp

ayer

s 0

527

906

953

1,00

21,

049

1,09

61,

147

1,17

91,

233

1,29

04,

437

10,3

82Ta

x ga

in fr

om th

e sa

le o

f a p

artn

ersh

ip in

tere

st o

n lo

ok-th

roug

h ba

sis

013

924

125

326

527

929

330

732

333

935

61,

177

2,79

5Pr

even

t use

of l

ever

aged

dis

tribu

tions

from

rela

ted

corp

orat

ions

to a

void

div

iden

d

treat

men

t ...

018

831

833

134

535

837

138

640

141

743

31,

540

3,54

8Ex

tend

sec

tion

338(

h)(1

6) to

cer

tain

ass

et a

cqui

sitio

ns

060

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

460

960

Rem

ove

fore

ign

taxe

s fro

m a

sec

tion

902

corp

orat

ion'

s fo

reig

n ta

x po

ol w

hen

earn

ings

are

el

imin

ated

.

013

2736

4650

5050

5050

5117

242

3C

reat

e a

new

cat

egor

y of

Sub

part

F in

com

e fo

r tra

nsac

tions

invo

lvin

g di

gita

l goo

ds o

r

serv

ices

0

585

1,00

41,

055

1,10

71,

163

1,22

11,

282

1,34

61,

413

1,48

44,

914

11,6

60Pr

even

t avo

idan

ce o

f for

eign

bas

e co

mpa

ny s

ales

inco

me

thro

ugh

man

ufac

turin

g se

rvic

e

arra

ngem

ents

0

1,23

52,

120

2,22

62,

337

2,45

42,

576

2,70

52,

840

2,98

33,

132

10,3

7224

,608

Res

trict

the

use

of h

ybrid

arr

ange

men

ts th

at c

reat

e st

atel

ess

inco

me

038

6673

8088

9710

711

712

914

234

593

7Li

mit

the

appl

icat

ion

of e

xcep

tions

und

er S

ubpa

rt F

for c

erta

in tr

ansa

ctio

ns th

at u

se

reve

rse

hybr

ids

to c

reat

e st

atel

ess

inco

me

067

115

121

127

133

140

147

154

162

170

563

1,33

6Li

mit

the

abilit

y of

dom

estic

ent

ities

to e

xpat

riate

0

150

415

706

1,02

51,

375

1,75

62,

173

2,62

73,

120

3,65

73,

671

17,0

04

Sub

tota

l, re

form

U.S

. int

erna

tiona

l tax

sys

tem

0

13,9

0023

,933

25,4

4427

,045

28,5

9530

,197

29,9

2330

,398

32,3

4834

,522

118,

917

276,

305

Tabl

e 2:

Rev

enue

Est

imat

es o

f Res

erve

for L

ong-

Run

Rev

enue

-Neu

tral

Bus

ines

s Ta

x R

efor

m P

ropo

sals

1/ 2

/

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)

280

Page 40: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)R

efor

m tr

eatm

ent o

f fin

anci

al a

nd in

sura

nce

indu

stry

inst

itutio

ns a

nd p

rodu

cts

Req

uire

that

der

ivat

ive

cont

ract

s be

mar

ked

to m

arke

t with

resu

lting

gai

n or

loss

trea

ted

as

ord

inar

y .

02,

583

4,67

43,

900

2,60

01,

655

1,13

269

750

652

852

915

,412

18,8

04M

odify

rule

s th

at a

pply

to s

ales

of l

ife in

sura

nce

cont

ract

s 0

1442

4648

5054

5658

6265

200

495

Mod

ify p

rora

tion

rule

s fo

r life

insu

ranc

e co

mpa

ny g

ener

al a

nd s

epar

ate

acco

unts

0

353

607

652

682

691

688

676

668

657

643

2,98

56,

317

Expa

nd p

ro ra

ta in

tere

st e

xpen

se d

isal

low

ance

for c

orpo

rate

-ow

ned

life

insu

ranc

e 0

3291

168

268

392

540

706

900

110

91

340

951

554

6

Sub

tota

l, re

form

trea

tmen

t of f

inan

cial

and

insu

ranc

e in

dust

ry in

stitu

tions

and

pro

duct

s 0

2,98

25,

414

4,76

63,

598

2,78

82,

414

2,13

52,

132

2,35

62,

577

19,5

4831

,162

Elim

inat

e fo

ssil

fuel

pre

fere

nces

Elim

inat

e oi

l and

nat

ural

gas

pre

fere

nces

:R

epea

l enh

ance

d oi

l rec

over

y cr

edit

4/

...0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Rep

eal c

redi

t for

oil

and

natu

ral g

as p

rodu

ced

from

mar

gina

l wel

ls 4

/ 0

00

00

00

00

00

00

Rep

eal e

xpen

sing

of i

ntan

gibl

e dr

illing

cos

ts

02,

317

3,24

42,

348

1,80

31,

469

1,11

066

546

346

446

711

,181

14,3

50R

epea

l ded

uctio

n fo

r ter

tiary

inje

ctan

ts

010

1010

1010

1010

1010

1050

100

Rep

eal e

xcep

tion

to p

assi

ve lo

ss li

mita

tion

for w

orki

ng in

tere

sts

in o

il an

d na

tura

l gas

pr

oper

ties

05

77

76

66

55

532

59R

epea

l per

cent

age

depl

etio

n fo

r oil

and

natu

ral g

as w

ells

0

1,50

21,

568

1,46

91,

375

1,30

61,

261

1,21

91,

181

1,08

91,

060

7,22

013

,030

Rep

eal d

omes

tic m

anuf

actu

ring

dedu

ctio

n fo

r oil

and

natu

ral g

as p

rodu

ctio

n 0

963

1,61

41,

585

1,52

21,

453

1,42

11,

410

1,40

81,

416

1,42

67,

137

14,2

18In

crea

se g

eolo

gica

l and

geo

phys

ical

am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riod

for i

ndep

ende

nt p

rodu

cers

to

seve

n ye

ars

010

338

259

658

146

333

722

414

412

312

82

125

308

1

Subt

otal

, elim

inat

e oi

l and

nat

ural

gas

pre

fere

nces

……

……

……

……

……

……

…0

4,90

06,

825

6,01

55,

298

4,70

74,

145

3,53

43,

211

3,10

73,

096

27,7

4544

,838

Elim

inat

e co

al p

refe

renc

es:

Rep

eal e

xpen

sing

of e

xplo

ratio

n an

d de

velo

pmen

t cos

ts

039

6669

7377

7775

7370

6032

467

9R

epea

l per

cent

age

depl

etio

n fo

r har

d m

iner

al fo

ssil

fuel

s 0

167

173

182

195

203

211

218

225

234

244

920

2,05

2R

epea

l cap

ital g

ains

trea

tmen

t for

roya

lties

0

2043

4749

5255

5861

6162

211

508

Rep

eal d

omes

tic m

anuf

actu

ring

dedu

ctio

n fo

r the

pro

duct

ion

of c

oal a

nd o

ther

har

d

min

eral

foss

il fu

els

036

6367

7073

7780

8387

9030

972

6

Subt

otal

, elim

inat

e co

al p

refe

renc

es …

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…0

262

345

365

387

405

420

431

442

452

456

1,76

43,

965

S

ubto

tal,

elim

inat

e fo

ssil

fuel

pre

fere

nces

0

5,16

27,

170

6,38

05,

685

5,11

24,

565

3,96

53,

653

3,55

93,

552

29,5

0948

,803

Oth

er re

venu

e ch

ange

s an

d lo

opho

le c

lose

rsR

epea

l the

exc

ise

tax

cred

it fo

r dis

tille

d sp

irits

with

flav

or a

nd w

ine

addi

tives

0

8511

211

211

211

211

211

211

211

211

253

31,

093

Rep

eal l

ast-i

n, fi

rst-o

ut m

etho

d of

acc

ount

ing

for i

nven

torie

s .

04,

151

7,82

38,

786

8,96

58,

850

8,77

88,

818

8,91

78,

770

8,85

038

,575

82,7

08R

epea

l low

er-o

f-cos

t-or-

mar

ket i

nven

tory

acc

ount

ing

met

hod

..0

644

1,40

41,

526

1,53

790

327

028

329

630

932

36,

014

7,49

5M

odify

dep

reci

atio

n ru

les

for p

urch

ases

of g

ener

al a

viat

ion

pass

enge

r airc

raft

087

273

411

456

532

549

385

209

155

153

1,75

93,

210

Rep

eal g

ain

limita

tion

for d

ivid

ends

rece

ived

in re

orga

niza

tion

exch

ange

s 0

153

263

276

290

305

319

335

352

370

388

1,28

73,

051

Expa

nd th

e de

finiti

on o

f sub

stan

tial b

uilt-

in lo

ss fo

r pur

pose

s of

par

tner

ship

loss

tran

sfer

s 0

57

77

77

88

1010

3376

Exte

nd p

artn

ersh

ip b

asis

lim

itatio

n ru

les

to n

onde

duct

ible

exp

endi

ture

s 0

6390

9710

210

510

811

011

211

411

645

71,

017

Lim

it th

e im

porta

tion

of lo

sses

und

er re

late

d pa

rty lo

ss li

mita

tion

rule

s 0

5681

8792

9597

9910

010

210

441

191

3D

eny

dedu

ctio

n fo

r pun

itive

dam

ages

.

00

2536

3738

3840

4041

4313

633

8M

odify

like

-kin

d ex

chan

ge ru

les

for r

eal p

rope

rty

061

61,

875

1,89

41,

914

1,93

61,

958

1,98

12,

006

2,03

12,

059

8,23

518

,270

Con

form

cor

pora

te o

wne

rshi

p st

anda

rds

024

4851

5457

6063

6669

7223

456

4Pr

even

t elim

inat

ion

of e

arni

ngs

and

prof

its th

roug

h di

strib

utio

ns o

f cer

tain

sto

ck

222

3335

3739

4143

4547

4916

639

1

Sub

tota

l, ot

her r

even

ue c

hang

es a

nd lo

opho

le c

lose

rs

25,

906

12,0

3413

,318

13,6

0312

,979

12,3

3712

,277

12,2

6312

,130

12,2

7957

,840

119,

126

Tota

l, R

eser

ve fo

r Lon

g-R

un R

even

ue-N

eutr

al B

usin

ess

Tax

Ref

orm

Pro

posa

ls

-10,

648

10,0

3530

,686

31,4

1230

,580

28,8

9127

,166

23,9

7021

,945

21,6

5821

,910

131,

604

248,

253

Tota

l rec

eipt

effe

ct

-10,

637

10,1

1330

,853

31,6

9430

,985

29,4

2727

,837

24,7

8722

,928

22,8

2323

,264

133,

072

254,

711

Tota

l out

lay

effe

ct

1178

167

282

405

536

671

817

983

1,16

51,

354

1,46

86,

458

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Tre

asur

y

Not

es:

1/Pr

esen

tatio

n in

this

tabl

e do

es n

ot re

flect

the

orde

r in

whi

ch th

ese

prop

osal

s w

ere

estim

ated

.2/

Beca

use

the

Adm

inis

tratio

n be

lieve

s th

at th

ese

prop

osal

s sh

ould

be

enac

ted

in th

e co

ntex

t of c

ompr

ehen

sive

bus

ines

s ta

x re

form

, the

am

ount

s ar

e no

t ref

lect

ed in

the

budg

et re

ceip

t est

imat

es a

nd a

re n

ot c

ount

ed to

war

d m

eetin

g th

e Ad

min

istra

tion'

s

defic

it re

duct

ion

goal

s. T

he A

dmin

istra

tion'

s pr

opos

als

that

are

refle

cted

in th

e bu

dget

est

imat

es o

f rec

eipt

s ar

e pr

esen

ted

in T

able

12-

4 in

the

Anal

ytic

al P

ersp

ectiv

es o

f the

FY

2015

Bud

get.

The

se in

clud

e an

allo

wan

ce, a

lso

pres

ente

d be

low

, for

te

mpo

rary

rece

ipts

that

wou

ld b

e ge

nera

ted

by th

e tra

nsiti

on to

a re

form

ed b

usin

ess

tax

syst

em.

Tr

ansi

tion

to a

refo

rmed

bus

ines

s ta

x sy

stem

.

037

,500

37,5

0037

,500

37,5

000

00

00

015

0,00

015

0,00

03/

This

pro

visi

on a

ffect

s bo

th re

ceip

ts a

nd o

utla

ys.

The

com

bine

d ef

fect

s ar

e sh

own

here

and

the

outla

y ef

fect

s in

clud

ed in

thes

e es

timat

es a

re d

etai

led

in th

e ta

ble

belo

w.

M

odify

and

per

man

ently

ext

end

the

Ren

ewab

le E

lect

ricity

Pro

duct

ion

Tax

Cre

dit

028

120

241

382

523

661

811

978

1,15

81,

349

1,29

46,

251

Ex

pand

and

sim

plify

the

tax

cred

it pr

ovid

ed to

qua

lifie

d sm

all e

mpl

oyer

s fo

r non

-

e

lect

ive

cont

ribut

ions

to e

mpl

oyee

hea

lth in

sura

nce

1150

4741

2313

106

57

517

420

7

Tot

al o

utla

y ef

fect

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…..…

..……

……

…11

7816

728

240

553

667

181

798

31,

165

1,35

41,

468

6,45

84/

This

pro

visi

on is

est

imat

ed to

hav

e ze

ro re

ceip

t effe

ct u

nder

the

Adm

inis

tratio

n's

curr

ent e

cono

mic

pro

ject

ions

.

281

Page 41: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Ince

ntiv

es fo

r job

cre

atio

n, c

lean

ene

rgy,

and

man

ufac

turin

gPr

ovid

e ad

ditio

nal t

ax c

redi

ts fo

r inv

estm

ent i

n qu

alifi

ed p

rope

rty u

sed

in a

qua

lifyi

ng

adva

nced

ene

rgy

man

ufac

turin

g pr

ojec

t 0

0-8

6-3

98-6

60-6

41-2

85-8

6166

55-1

,785

-1,8

96D

esig

nate

Pro

mis

e Zo

nes

3/

0-3

66-6

93-6

41-6

09-5

94-5

88-5

82-5

83-5

98-6

22-2

,903

-5,8

76Pr

ovid

e ne

w M

anuf

actu

ring

Com

mun

ities

Tax

Cre

dit

0-2

0-1

04-2

75-4

54-5

89-6

76-7

37-7

49-6

46-4

14-1

,442

-4,6

64Pr

ovid

e a

tax

cred

it fo

r the

pro

duct

ion

of a

dvan

ced

tech

nolo

gy v

ehic

les

0-7

05-6

75-7

53-8

75-9

84-8

50-5

37-2

128

129

4-3

,992

-4,8

25Pr

ovid

e a

tax

cred

it fo

r med

ium

- and

hea

vy-d

uty

alte

rnat

ive-

fuel

com

mer

cial

veh

icle

s 0

-54

-86

-71

-64

-65

-47

-14

00

0-3

40-4

01M

odify

tax-

exem

pt b

onds

for I

ndia

n tri

bal g

over

nmen

ts

0-4

-12

-12

-12

-12

-12

-12

-12

-12

-12

-52

-112

Exte

nd th

e ta

x cr

edit

for c

ellu

losi

c bi

ofue

ls

-30

-70

-121

-157

-178

-204

-236

-237

-210

-171

-114

-730

-1,6

98M

odify

and

ext

end

the

tax

cred

it fo

r the

con

stru

ctio

n of

ene

rgy-

effic

ient

new

hom

es

-78

-127

-137

-163

-182

-199

-215

-231

-246

-261

-287

-808

-2,0

48R

educ

e ex

cise

taxe

s on

liqu

efie

d na

tura

l gas

to b

ring

into

par

ity w

ith d

iese

l 0

-2-2

-2-2

-2-2

-2-2

-2-2

-10

-20

S

ubto

tal,

ince

ntiv

es fo

r job

cre

atio

n, c

lean

ene

rgy,

and

man

ufac

turin

g -1

08-1

,348

-1,9

16-2

,472

-3,0

36-3

,290

-2,9

11-2

,360

-1,7

62-1

,343

-1,1

02-1

2,06

2-2

1,54

0

Ince

ntiv

es fo

r inv

estm

ent i

n in

fras

truc

ture

Prov

ide

Amer

ica

Fast

For

war

d Bo

nds

(AFF

B) a

nd e

xpan

d el

igib

le u

ses

3/

00

-10

00

1-1

-10

1-1

-1Al

low

elig

ible

use

s of

AFF

B to

incl

ude

finan

cing

all

qual

ified

priv

ate

activ

ity b

ond

prog

ram

ca

tego

ries

3/

0-1

-4-1

0-1

4-2

1-2

7-3

2-3

9-4

6-5

2-5

0-2

46Al

low

cur

rent

refu

ndin

gs o

f Sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

tal b

onds

0

-3-5

-5-5

-5-5

-5-5

-5-5

-23

-48

Rep

eal t

he $

150

milli

on n

on-h

ospi

tal b

ond

limita

tion

on q

ualif

ied

sect

ion

501(

c)(3

) bon

ds

00

-1-3

-5-7

-9-1

1-1

3-1

6-1

7-1

6-8

2In

crea

se n

atio

nal l

imita

tion

amou

nt fo

r qua

lifie

d hi

ghw

ay o

r sur

face

frei

ght t

rans

fer f

acilit

y

bond

s 0

0-3

-16

-34

-52

-72

-92

-113

-133

-154

-105

-669

Elim

inat

e th

e vo

lum

e ca

p fo

r priv

ate

activ

ity b

onds

for w

ater

infra

stru

ctur

e 0

0-3

-5-9

-14

-20

-27

-33

-41

-49

-31

-201

Incr

ease

the

25-p

erce

nt li

mit

on la

nd a

cqui

sitio

n re

stric

tion

on p

rivat

e ac

tivity

bon

ds

00

-2-4

-8-1

1-1

5-1

9-2

3-2

7-3

2-2

5-1

41Al

low

mor

e fle

xibl

e re

sear

ch a

rran

gem

ents

for p

urpo

ses

of p

rivat

e bu

sine

ss u

se li

mits

0

00

0-1

-1-1

-1-3

-3-3

-2-1

3R

epea

l the

gov

ernm

ent o

wne

rshi

p re

quire

men

t for

cer

tain

type

s of

exe

mpt

faci

lity

bond

s 0

-14

-66

-140

-216

-290

-364

-437

-509

-579

-644

-726

-3,2

59Ex

empt

fore

ign

pens

ion

fund

s fro

m th

e ap

plic

atio

n of

the

Fore

ign

Inve

stm

ent i

n R

eal

Pr

oper

ty T

ax A

ct

.0

-114

-196

-205

-216

-227

-238

-250

-262

-275

-289

-958

-227

2

Sub

tota

l, in

cent

ives

for i

nves

tmen

t in

infr

astr

uctu

re

0-1

32-2

81-3

88-5

08-6

28-7

50-8

75-1

,001

-1,1

25-1

,244

-1,9

37-6

,932

Tax

cuts

for f

amili

es a

nd in

divi

dual

sEx

pand

the

EITC

for w

orke

rs w

ithou

t qua

lifyi

ng c

hild

ren

3/

0-4

90-6

,308

-6,3

35-6

,362

-6,4

44-6

,536

-6,6

53-6

,760

-6,8

74-6

,978

-25,

939

-59,

740

Prov

ide

for a

utom

atic

enr

ollm

ent i

n IR

As, i

nclu

ding

a s

mal

l em

ploy

er ta

x cr

edit,

and

dou

ble

th

e ta

x cr

edit

for s

mal

l em

ploy

er p

lan

star

t-up

cost

s 3/

0

0-8

17-1

,276

-1,3

09-1

,410

-1,5

52-1

,728

-1,9

02-2

,137

-2,3

76-4

,812

-14,

507

Expa

nd th

e C

hild

and

Dep

ende

nt C

are

Tax

Cre

dit 3

/ 0

-287

-1,0

64-1

,060

-1,0

56-1

,045

-1,0

39-1

,030

-1,0

21-1

,011

-997

-4,5

12-9

,610

Exte

nd e

xclu

sion

from

inco

me

for c

ance

llatio

n of

cer

tain

hom

e m

ortg

age

debt

-2

,687

-3,4

97-3

,343

-825

00

00

00

0-7

,665

-7,6

65Pr

ovid

e ex

clus

ion

from

inco

me

for s

tude

nt lo

an fo

rgiv

enes

s fo

r stu

dent

s in

cer

tain

in

com

e-ba

sed

or in

com

e-co

ntin

gent

repa

ymen

t pro

gram

s w

ho h

ave

com

plet

ed

paym

ent o

blig

atio

ns

.0

00

00

00

00

-2-3

0-5

Prov

ide

excl

usio

n fro

m in

com

e fo

r stu

dent

loan

forg

iven

ess

and

for c

erta

in s

chol

arsh

ip

amou

nts

for p

artic

ipan

ts in

the

Indi

an H

ealth

Ser

vice

Hea

lth P

rofe

ssio

ns P

rogr

ams

0-6

-14

-14

-15

-16

-18

-19

-20

-21

-22

-65

-165

Mak

e Pe

ll G

rant

s ex

clud

able

from

inco

me

and

from

tax

cred

it ca

lcul

atio

ns 3

/ 0

-23

-768

-118

4-1

116

-106

8-1

019

-977

-938

-904

-867

-415

9-8

864

S

ubto

tal,

tax

cuts

for f

amili

es a

nd in

divi

dual

s -2

,687

-4,3

03-1

2,31

4-1

0,69

4-9

,858

-9,9

83-1

0,16

4-1

0,40

7-1

0,64

1-1

0,94

9-1

1,24

3-4

7,15

2-1

00,5

56

Upp

er-in

com

e ta

x pr

ovis

ions

Red

uce

the

valu

e of

cer

tain

tax

expe

nditu

res

026

,587

43,3

5647

,943

53,2

5958

,632

63,7

5068

,720

73,6

4978

,581

83,5

8922

9,77

759

8,06

6Im

plem

ent t

he B

uffe

t Rul

e by

impo

sing

a n

ew "F

air S

hare

Tax

" 0

10,5

36-1

,241

1,60

94,

383

5,59

85,

874

6,17

36,

427

6,64

57,

022

20,8

8553

,026

S

ubto

tal,

uppe

r-in

com

e ta

x pr

ovis

ions

0

37,1

2342

,115

49,5

5257

,642

64,2

3069

,624

74,8

9380

,076

85,2

2690

,611

250,

662

651,

092

Mod

ify e

stat

e an

d gi

ft ta

x pr

ovis

ions

Res

tore

the

esta

te, g

ift, a

nd g

ener

atio

n-sk

ippi

ng tr

ansf

er (G

ST) t

ax p

aram

eter

s in

effe

ct

in 2

009

00

00

015

,930

17,3

0918

,846

20,4

1222

,250

23,5

3515

,930

118,

282

Req

uire

con

sist

ency

in v

alue

for t

rans

fer a

nd in

com

e ta

x pu

rpos

es

00

215

228

242

257

272

290

310

333

354

942

2,50

1R

equi

re a

min

imum

term

for g

rant

or re

tain

ed a

nnui

ty tr

usts

0

024

432

541

150

460

271

184

31,

004

1,06

71,

484

5,71

1Li

mit

dura

tion

of G

ST ta

x ex

empt

ion

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Coo

rdin

ate

certa

in in

com

e an

d tra

nsfe

r tax

rule

s ap

plic

able

to g

rant

or tr

usts

0

059

7797

125

157

201

256

326

346

358

1,64

4Ex

tend

the

lien

on e

stat

e ta

x de

ferr

als

whe

re e

stat

e co

nsis

ts la

rgel

y of

inte

rest

in c

lose

ly

held

bus

ines

s 0

019

2021

2223

2426

2830

8221

3M

odify

GST

tax

treat

men

t of H

ealth

and

Edu

catio

n Ex

clus

ion

Trus

ts

00

-30

-29

-27

-26

-24

-23

-21

-20

-18

-112

-218

Sim

plify

gift

tax

excl

usio

n fo

r ann

ual g

ifts

00

7013

820

526

832

835

843

551

760

568

12,

924

Expa

nd a

pplic

abilit

y of

def

initi

on o

f exe

cuto

r N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ct

Sub

tota

l, m

odify

est

ate

and

gift

tax

prov

isio

ns

00

577

759

949

17,0

8018

,667

20,4

0722

,261

24,4

3825

,919

19,3

6513

1,05

7

Tabl

e 3:

Rev

enue

Est

imat

es o

f FY

2015

Bud

get P

ropo

sals

1/ 2

/

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)

282

Page 42: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)R

efor

m tr

eatm

ent o

f fin

anci

al in

dust

ry in

stitu

tions

and

pro

duct

sIm

pose

a fi

nanc

ial c

risis

resp

onsi

bilit

y fe

e 0

03,

058

6,14

26,

271

6,39

56,

507

6,67

36,

830

6,99

37,

155

21,8

6656

,024

Req

uire

cur

rent

incl

usio

n in

inco

me

of a

ccru

ed m

arke

t dis

coun

t and

lim

it th

e ac

crua

l

amou

nt fo

r dis

tress

ed d

ebt

014

3847

4644

4136

3228

2418

935

0R

equi

re th

at th

e co

st b

asis

of s

tock

that

is a

cov

ered

sec

urity

mus

t be

dete

rmin

ed u

sing

an

ave

rage

cos

t bas

is m

etho

d .

00

5316

227

940

648

150

152

254

456

790

03

515

S

ubto

tal,

refo

rm tr

eatm

ent o

f fin

anci

al in

dust

ry in

stitu

tions

and

pro

duct

s 0

143,

149

6,35

16,

596

6,84

57,

029

7,21

07,

384

7,56

57,

746

22,9

5559

,889

Loop

hole

clo

sers

Tax

carr

ied

(pro

fits)

inte

rest

s as

ord

inar

y in

com

e 0

2,15

31,

951

1,76

21,

474

1,40

31,

443

1,21

997

276

565

58,

743

13,7

97R

equi

re n

on-s

pous

e be

nefic

iarie

s of

dec

ease

d IR

A ow

ners

and

retir

emen

t pla

n

parti

cipa

nts

to ta

ke in

herit

ed d

istri

butio

ns o

ver n

o m

ore

than

five

yea

rs

091

235

388

543

702

735

693

642

591

539

1,95

95,

159

Lim

it th

e to

tal a

ccru

al o

f tax

-favo

red

retir

emen

t ben

efits

0

1,48

22,

157

2,33

42,

512

2,69

72,

940

3,23

33,

479

3,63

83,

905

11,1

8228

,377

Con

form

SEC

A ta

xes

for p

rofe

ssio

nal s

ervi

ce b

usin

esse

s 0

2,15

13,

009

3,22

73,

461

3,69

13,

936

4,20

74,

470

4,69

14,

836

15,5

3937

,679

S

ubto

tal,

loop

hole

clo

sers

0

5,87

77,

352

7,71

17,

990

8,49

39,

054

9,35

29,

563

9,68

59,

935

37,4

2385

,012

Oth

er re

venu

e ra

iser

sIn

crea

se O

il Sp

ill Li

abilit

y Tr

ust F

und

finan

cing

rate

by

one

cent

and

upd

ate

the

law

to

incl

ude

othe

r sou

rces

of c

rude

s 0

6082

8892

9499

102

108

111

115

416

951

Rei

nsta

te S

uper

fund

taxe

s:R

eins

tate

and

ext

end

Supe

rfund

exc

ise

taxe

s 0

633

852

863

870

879

888

895

903

911

917

4,09

78,

611

Rei

nsta

te S

uper

fund

env

ironm

enta

l inc

ome

tax

096

91

333

142

21

467

150

11

515

154

91

592

163

41

677

669

214

659

Su

btot

al, r

eins

tate

Sup

erfu

nd ta

xes

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

01,

602

2,18

52,

285

2,33

72,

380

2,40

32,

444

2,49

52,

545

2,59

410

,789

23,2

70In

crea

se to

bacc

o ta

xes

and

inde

x fo

r inf

latio

n 0

7,79

79,

936

9,35

08,

738

8,20

37,

721

7,26

76,

840

6,43

85,

927

44,0

2478

,217

Mak

e un

empl

oym

ent i

nsur

ance

sur

tax

perm

anen

t 0

1,05

11,

461

1,49

31,

524

1,55

11,

575

1,59

91,

623

1,64

91,

674

7,08

015

,200

Prov

ide

shor

t-ter

m ta

x re

lief t

o em

ploy

ers

and

expa

nd F

UTA

bas

e 0

-2,6

62-3

,119

9,34

410

,817

6,98

87,

295

8,08

07,

155

8,03

67,

048

21,3

6858

,982

Enha

nce

and

mod

ify th

e co

nser

vatio

n ea

sem

ent d

educ

tion:

Enha

nce

and

mak

e pe

rman

ent i

ncen

tives

for t

he d

onat

ion

of c

onse

rvat

ion

ease

men

ts

00

-5-8

-12

-16

-28

-51

-67

-70

-74

-41

-331

Elim

inat

e th

e de

duct

ion

for c

ontri

butio

ns o

f con

serv

atio

n ea

sem

ents

on

golf

cour

ses

037

5355

5961

6468

7174

7726

561

9R

estri

ct d

educ

tions

and

har

mon

ize

the

rule

s fo

r con

tribu

tions

of c

onse

rvat

ion

ease

men

ts

for h

isto

ric p

rese

rvat

ion

08

1116

2226

2728

3132

3383

234

Su

btot

al, e

nhan

ce a

nd m

odify

the

cons

erva

tion

ease

men

t ded

uctio

n …

……

……

045

5963

6971

6345

3536

3630

752

2El

imin

ate

dedu

ctio

n fo

r div

iden

ds o

n st

ock

of p

ublic

ly-tr

aded

cor

pora

tions

hel

d in

em

ploy

ee s

tock

ow

ners

hip

plan

s 0

618

767

777

788

798

808

818

827

837

845

3,74

87,

883

S

ubto

tal,

othe

r rev

enue

rais

ers

08,

511

11,3

7123

,400

24,3

6520

,085

19,9

6420

,355

19,0

8319

,652

18,2

3987

,732

185,

025

Red

uce

the

tax

gap

and

mak

e re

form

sEx

pand

info

rmat

ion

repo

rting

:R

equi

re in

form

atio

n re

porti

ng fo

r priv

ate

sepa

rate

acc

ount

s of

life

insu

ranc

e co

mpa

nies

0

00

11

11

11

11

38

Req

uire

a c

ertif

ied

TIN

from

con

tract

ors

and

allo

w c

erta

in w

ithho

ldin

g 0

2661

103

141

147

154

161

168

176

184

478

1,32

1M

odify

repo

rting

of t

uitio

n ex

pens

es a

nd s

chol

arsh

ips

on F

orm

109

8-T

3/

05

6565

6565

6667

6870

7026

560

6Pr

ovid

e fo

r rec

ipro

cal r

epor

ting

of in

form

atio

n in

con

nect

ion

with

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

FA

TCA

No

reve

nue

effe

ct

Subt

otal

, exp

and

info

rmat

ion

repo

rting

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…0

3112

616

920

721

322

122

923

724

725

574

61,

935

Impr

ove

com

plia

nce

by b

usin

esse

s:R

equi

re g

reat

er e

lect

roni

c fil

ing

of re

turn

s N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

Impl

emen

t sta

ndar

ds c

larif

ying

whe

n em

ploy

ee le

asin

g co

mpa

nies

can

be

held

liab

le fo

r

thei

r clie

nts'

Fed

eral

em

ploy

men

t tax

es

04

56

66

77

78

827

64In

crea

se c

erta

inty

with

resp

ect t

o w

orke

r cla

ssifi

catio

n 4

7938

675

991

41,

000

1,09

11,

187

1,28

91,

396

1,50

93,

138

9,61

0In

crea

se in

form

atio

n sh

arin

g to

adm

inis

ter e

xcis

e ta

xes

04

913

1415

1718

1919

2055

148

Su

btot

al, i

mpr

ove

com

plia

nce

by b

usin

esse

s …

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…4

8740

077

893

41,

021

1,11

51,

212

1,31

51,

423

1,53

73,

220

9,82

2St

reng

then

tax

adm

inis

tratio

n:Im

pose

liab

ility

on s

hare

hold

ers

to c

olle

ct u

npai

d in

com

e ta

xes

of a

pplic

able

cor

pora

tions

30

932

545

047

449

752

154

456

859

361

964

72,

267

5,23

8In

crea

se le

vy a

utho

rity

for p

aym

ents

to M

edic

are

prov

ider

s w

ith d

elin

quen

t tax

deb

t 0

5071

7476

7677

7880

8081

347

743

Impl

emen

t a p

rogr

am in

tegr

ity s

tatu

tory

cap

adj

ustm

ent f

or ta

x ad

min

istra

tion

037

01,

265

2,58

43,

978

5,42

66,

620

7,43

17,

850

8,13

78,

343

13,6

2352

,004

Stre

amlin

e au

dit a

nd a

djus

tmen

t pro

cedu

res

for l

arge

par

tner

ship

s 0

144

192

191

188

183

177

177

180

182

184

898

1,79

8R

evis

e of

fer-

in-c

ompr

omis

e ap

plic

atio

n ru

les

01

11

22

22

22

27

17Ex

pand

IRS

acce

ss to

info

rmat

ion

in th

e N

atio

nal D

irect

ory

of N

ew H

ires

for t

ax

adm

inis

tratio

n pu

rpos

es

No

reve

nue

effe

ctM

ake

repe

ated

willf

ul fa

ilure

to fi

le a

tax

retu

rn a

felo

ny

00

00

11

11

22

22

10Fa

cilit

ate

tax

com

plia

nce

with

loca

l jur

isdi

ctio

ns

01

11

12

22

22

26

16Ex

tend

sta

tute

of l

imita

tions

whe

re S

tate

adj

ustm

ent a

ffect

s Fe

dera

l tax

liab

ility

00

00

14

44

44

45

25Im

prov

e in

vest

igat

ive

disc

losu

re s

tatu

te

00

00

11

11

22

22

10R

equi

re ta

xpay

ers

who

pre

pare

thei

r ret

urns

ele

ctro

nica

lly b

ut fi

le th

eir r

etur

ns o

n pa

per t

o

prin

t the

ir re

turn

s w

ith a

sca

nnab

le c

ode

No

reve

nue

effe

ct

283

Page 43: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)Al

low

the

IRS

to a

bsor

b cr

edit

and

debi

t car

d pr

oces

sing

fees

for c

erta

in ta

x pa

ymen

ts

01

22

22

22

22

29

19Pr

ovid

e th

e R

S w

ith g

reat

er fl

exib

ility

to a

ddre

ss c

orre

ctib

le e

rror

s 3/

0

715

1617

1719

1920

2122

7217

3M

ake

e-fil

ing

man

dato

ry fo

r exe

mpt

org

aniz

atio

ns

No

reve

nue

effe

ctAu

thor

ize

the

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Tre

asur

y to

requ

ire a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

to b

e in

clud

ed

in e

lect

roni

cally

file

d Fo

rm 5

500

Ann

ual R

epor

ts a

nd e

lect

roni

c fil

ing

of c

erta

in o

ther

em

ploy

ee b

enef

it pl

an re

ports

N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

Impo

se a

pen

alty

on

failu

re to

com

ply

with

ele

ctro

nic

filin

g re

quire

men

ts

00

00

11

11

22

22

10Pr

ovid

e w

hist

lebl

ower

s w

ith p

rote

ctio

n fro

m re

talia

tion

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Prov

ide

stro

nger

pro

tect

ion

from

impr

oper

dis

clos

ure

of ta

xpay

er in

form

atio

n in

w

hist

lebl

ower

act

ions

N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

Inde

x al

l pen

altie

s fo

r inf

latio

n 0

4560

6162

6365

6668

7071

291

631

Exte

nd p

aid

prep

arer

EIT

C d

ue d

iligen

ce re

quire

men

ts to

the

Chi

ld T

ax C

redi

t N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctEx

tend

IRS

auth

ority

to re

quire

a tr

unca

ted

Soci

al S

ecur

ity N

umbe

r on

Form

W-2

N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctAd

d ta

x cr

imes

to th

e Ag

grav

ated

Iden

tity

Thef

t Sta

tute

N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctIm

pose

a c

ivil

pena

lty o

n ta

x id

entit

y th

eft c

rimes

N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctAl

low

Sta

tes

to s

end

notic

es o

f int

ent t

o of

fset

Fed

eral

tax

refu

nds

to c

olle

ct S

tate

tax

ob

ligat

ions

by

regu

lar f

irst-c

lass

mai

l ins

tead

of c

ertif

ied

mai

l N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

Expl

icitl

y pr

ovid

e th

at th

e D

epar

tmen

t of t

he T

reas

ury

and

IRS

have

aut

horit

y to

regu

late

al

l pai

d re

turn

pre

pare

rs 4

/ N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctR

atio

naliz

e ta

x re

turn

filin

g du

e da

tes

so th

ey a

re s

tagg

ered

3/

021

022

023

024

225

226

327

328

529

730

91,

154

2,58

1In

crea

se th

e pe

nalty

app

licab

le to

pai

d ta

x pr

epar

ers

who

eng

age

in w

illful

or r

eckl

ess

co

nduc

t 0

00

11

11

11

11

38

Enha

nce

adm

inis

trabi

lity

of th

e ap

prai

ser p

enal

ty

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Su

btot

al, s

treng

then

tax

adm

inis

tratio

n …

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…30

91,

154

2,27

73,

635

5,07

06,

552

7,77

98,

626

9,09

39,

423

9,67

418

,688

63,2

83

Sub

tota

l, re

duce

the

tax

gap

and

mak

e re

form

s 31

31,

272

2,80

34,

582

6,21

17,

786

9,11

510

,067

10,6

4511

,093

11,4

6622

,654

75,0

40

Sim

plify

the

tax

syst

emSi

mpl

ify th

e ru

les

for c

laim

ing

the

EITC

for w

orke

rs w

ithou

t qua

lifyi

ng c

hild

ren

3/

0-4

4-5

87-5

99-6

12-5

98-6

09-6

21-6

32-5

98-6

09-2

,440

-5,5

09M

odify

ado

ptio

n cr

edit

to a

llow

trib

al d

eter

min

atio

n of

spe

cial

nee

ds

00

00

0-1

-1-1

-1-1

-1-1

-6Si

mpl

ify m

inim

um re

quire

d di

strib

utio

n ru

les

0-5

-5-3

519

3860

8812

216

511

484

Allo

w a

ll in

herit

ed p

lan

and

RA

bala

nces

to b

e ro

lled

over

with

in 6

0 da

ys

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Rep

eal n

on-q

ualif

ied

pref

erre

d st

ock

desi

gnat

ion

031

5251

5047

4439

3430

2723

140

5R

epea

l pre

fere

ntia

l div

iden

d ru

le fo

r pub

licly

trad

ed a

nd p

ublic

ly o

ffere

d R

EITs

N

eglig

ible

reve

nue

effe

ctR

efor

m e

xcis

e ta

x ba

sed

on in

vest

men

t inc

ome

of p

rivat

e fo

unda

tions

0

0-4

-4-5

-5-5

-5-6

-6-7

-18

-47

Rem

ove

bond

ing

requ

irem

ents

for c

erta

in ta

xpay

ers

subj

ect t

o Fe

dera

l exc

ise

taxe

s on

di

stille

d sp

irits

, win

e, a

nd b

eer

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Sim

plify

arb

itrag

e in

vest

men

t res

trict

ions

0

-2-1

0-1

8-2

8-3

8-4

6-5

8-6

8-7

6-8

7-9

6-4

31Si

mpl

ify s

ingl

e-fa

mily

hou

sing

mor

tgag

e bo

nd ta

rget

ing

requ

irem

ents

0

-1-3

-5-7

-10

-12

-17

-20

-22

-24

-26

-121

Stre

amlin

e pr

ivat

e bu

sine

ss li

mits

on

gove

rnm

enta

l bon

ds

0-1

-3-5

-7-9

-11

-13

-15

-17

-19

-25

-100

Excl

ude

self-

cons

truct

ed a

sset

s of

sm

all t

axpa

yers

from

the

unifo

rm c

apita

lizat

ion

rule

s 0

-47

-50

-68

-71

-90

-95

-98

-103

-107

-112

-326

-841

Rep

eal t

echn

ical

term

inat

ions

of p

artn

ersh

ips

016

2021

2223

2324

2525

2610

222

5R

epea

l ant

i-chu

rnin

g ru

les

of s

ectio

n 19

7 .

0-2

5-1

06-2

09-2

78-3

13-3

28-3

31-3

31-3

31-3

31-9

31-2

,583

Rep

eal s

peci

al e

stim

ated

tax

paym

ent p

rovi

sion

for c

erta

in in

sura

nce

com

pani

es

Neg

ligib

le re

venu

e ef

fect

Rep

eal t

he te

leph

one

exci

se ta

x 0

-419

-357

-302

-253

-213

-178

-148

-122

-102

-83

-1,5

44-2

,177

Incr

ease

the

stan

dard

mile

age

rate

for a

utom

obile

use

by

volu

ntee

rs

0-1

6-4

7-4

5-4

4-4

4-4

4-4

5-4

6-4

8-4

9-1

96-4

28

Sub

tota

l, si

mpl

ify th

e ta

x sy

stem

0

-513

-1,1

00-1

,186

-1,2

28-1

,232

-1,2

24-1

,214

-1,1

97-1

,131

-1,1

04-5

,259

-11,

129

Use

r fee

Ref

orm

inla

nd w

ater

way

s fu

ndin

g 0

8211

311

311

311

311

311

311

311

311

453

41

100

S

ubto

tal,

user

fee

082

113

113

113

113

113

113

113

113

114

534

1,10

0

Oth

er in

itiat

ives

Allo

w o

ffset

of F

eder

al in

com

e ta

x re

fund

s to

col

lect

del

inqu

ent s

tate

inco

me

taxe

s fo

r

out-o

f-sta

te re

side

nts

No

reve

nue

effe

ctAu

thor

ize

the

limite

d sh

arin

g of

bus

ines

s ta

x re

turn

info

rmat

ion

to im

prov

e th

e ac

cura

cy o

f

impo

rtant

mea

sure

s of

the

econ

omy

No

reve

nue

effe

ctEl

imin

ate

certa

in re

view

s co

nduc

ted

by th

e U

.S. T

reas

ury

Insp

ecto

r Gen

eral

for T

ax

Adm

inis

tratio

n N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

Mod

ify in

dexi

ng to

pre

vent

def

latio

nary

adj

ustm

ents

N

o re

venu

e ef

fect

S

ubto

tal,

othe

r ini

tiativ

es

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Tota

l, FY

201

5 B

udge

t Pro

posa

ls

-2,4

8246

,583

51,8

6977

,728

89,2

3610

9,49

911

8,51

712

7,54

113

4,52

414

3,22

414

9,33

737

4,91

51,

048,

058

Tota

l rec

eipt

effe

ct

-2,4

8247

,127

59,9

7387

,668

100,

609

122,

465

133,

219

144,

091

152,

977

163,

581

171,

656

417,

842

1,18

3,36

6To

tal o

utla

y ef

fect

0

544

8,10

49,

940

11,3

7312

,966

14,7

0216

,550

18,4

5320

,357

22,3

1942

,927

135,

308

Dep

artm

ent o

f the

Tre

asur

y

284

Page 44: General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal …...General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals Department of the Treasury March 2014

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2015

-201

920

15-2

024

Fisc

al Y

ears

(in m

illion

s of

dol

lars

)N

otes

:1/

Pres

enta

tion

in th

is ta

ble

does

not

refle

ct th

e or

der i

n w

hich

thes

e pr

opos

als

wer

e es

timat

ed.

2/Ta

ble

12-4

in th

e An

alyt

ical

Per

spec

tives

of t

he F

Y 20

15 B

udge

t inc

lude

s th

e ef

fect

s of

a n

umbe

r of p

ropo

sals

that

are

not

refle

cted

her

e. T

hese

pro

posa

ls w

ould

: lev

y a

fee

on th

e pr

oduc

tion

of h

ardr

ock

min

eral

s to

rest

ore

aban

done

d m

ines

, ret

urn

fe

es o

n th

e pr

oduc

tion

of c

oal t

o pr

e-20

06 le

vels

to re

stor

e ab

ando

ned

min

es, p

rovi

de a

utho

rity

to re

adily

sha

re b

enef

icia

l ow

ners

hip

of U

.S. c

ompa

nies

with

law

enf

orce

men

t, en

hanc

e U

nem

ploy

men

t Ins

uran

ce in

tegr

ity, i

ncre

ase

fees

for M

igra

tory

Bi

rd H

untin

g an

d C

onse

rvat

ion

Stam

ps, e

stab

lish

a m

anda

tory

sur

char

ge fo

r air

traffi

c se

rvic

es, r

eaut

horiz

e sp

ecia

l ass

essm

ent o

n do

mes

tic n

ucle

ar u

tiliti

es, p

erm

anen

tly e

xten

d an

d re

allo

cate

the

trave

l pro

mot

ion

surc

harg

e, e

xten

d th

e G

ener

aliz

ed

Syst

em o

f Pre

fere

nces

, tra

nsiti

on to

a re

form

ed b

usin

ess

tax

syst

em, a

nd e

nact

com

preh

ensi

ve im

mig

ratio

n re

form

.3/

This

pro

visi

on a

ffect

s bo

th re

ceip

ts a

nd o

utla

ys.

The

com

bine

d ef

fect

s ar

e sh

own

here

and

the

outla

y ef

fect

s in

clud

ed in

thes

e es

timat

es a

re d

etai

led

in th

e ta

ble

belo

w.

D

esig

nate

Pro

mis

e Zo

nes

011

2323

2526

2830

3133

3610

826

6

Prov

ide

Amer

ica

Fast

For

war

d Bo

nds

(AAF

B) a

nd e

xpan

d el

igib

le u

ses

021

696

62,

051

3,22

14,

505

5,87

87,

325

8,82

610

,360

11,9

1410

,959

55,2

62

Allo

w e

ligib

le u

ses

of A

FFB

to in

clud

e fin

anci

ng a

ll qu

alifi

ed p

rivat

e ac

tivity

bon

d

p

rogr

am c

ateg

orie

s 0

5022

748

976

51,

054

1,35

61,

668

1,99

02,

319

2,65

12,

585

12,5

69

Expa

nd th

e EI

TC fo

r wor

kers

with

out q

ualif

ying

chi

ldre

n 0

272

5,43

65,

457

5,47

65,

545

5,62

35,

722

5,81

15,

900

5,98

122

,186

51,2

23

Prov

ide

for a

utom

atic

enr

ollm

ent i

n IR

As, i

nclu

ding

a s

mal

l em

ploy

er ta

x cr

edit,

and

d

oubl

e th

e ta

x cr

edit

for s

mal

l em

ploy

er p

lan

star

t-up

cost

s 0

096

148

150

152

153

156

160

164

168

546

1,34

7

Expa

nd th

e C

hild

and

Dep

ende

nt C

are

Tax

Cre

dit

00

347

342

348

352

362

368

374

382

392

1,38

93,

267

M

ake

Pell

Gra

nts

excl

udab

le fr

om in

com

e an

d fro

m ta

x cr

edit

calc

ulat

ions

0

054

795

990

686

282

479

376

473

570

43,

274

7,09

4

Mod

ify re

porti

ng o

f tui

tion

expe

nses

and

sch

olar

ship

s on

For

m 1

098-

T 0

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

0-2

1-2

1-8

0-1

82

Prov

ide

the

IRS

with

gre

ater

flex

ibilit

y to

add

ress

cor

rect

ible

err

ors

0-3

-6-7

-7-7

-8-8

-8-9

-9-3

0-7

2

Rat

iona

lize

tax

retu

rn fi

ling

due

date

s so

they

are

sta

gger

ed

0-2

8-2

8-2

8-2

9-2

9-3

0-3

0-3

1-3

2-3

3-1

42-2

98

Sim

plify

the

rule

s fo

r cla

imin

g th

e EI

TC fo

r wor

kers

with

out q

ualif

ying

chi

ldre

n 0

2651

652

653

852

653

654

655

652

653

62,

132

4,83

2

Tot

al o

utla

y ef

fect

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

……

…..…

..……

……

…0

544

8,10

49,

940

11,3

7312

,966

14,7

0216

,550

18,4

5320

,357

22,3

1942

,927

135,

308

4/Th

is e

stim

ate

and

the

corr

espo

ndin

g ba

selin

e re

venu

e w

ere

prep

ared

prio

r to

the

deci

sion

of t

he C

ourt

of A

ppea

ls in

Lov

ing

v. C

omm

issi

oner

. Th

e ba

selin

e th

us a

ssum

ed th

at th

e IR

S's

posi

tion

in L

ovin

g v.

Com

mis

sion

er w

as c

orre

ct.

Con

sequ

ently

,

the

prop

osal

gen

erat

es o

nly

negl

igib

le re

venu

e.

285