GE 10 Lab Exercise # 1PACINGSubmitted to:Engr. Trishia C.
GuevaraInstructor
Submitted by:CGE TEN TEAMChristian Galope - LeaderPatricia
Leriezz CorpuzJeanine BalomitJA HoksonChristine CacdacRaul Mendoza.
Jr.Joel Andrew SollestreAyra OlmedoMary Rosei MonzonKim Lloyd
PagapongPACINGDate of Fieldwork: February 6, 2015Weather Condition:
SunnyI. ObjectivesThe main purpose of this lab exercise is to
determine individual pace factor. It also aims for good precision
through checking the consistency of the paces made with rough
estimates to measure length using human pace. Usually, it is useful
when there are no instruments present though it lacks accuracy. It
also an evaluation on how we understood and must apply the tape
corrections rule for better results.II. Group
CompositionPacers:Christian GalopePatricia Leriezz CorpuzJeanine
BalomitJA HoksonChristine CacdacRaul Mendoza. Jr.Joel Andrew
SollestreAyra OlmedoMary Rosei MonzonKim Lloyd PagapongIII.
Instruments and Accessories UsedThe instrument used to layout the
desired distance of 50 meters, is the steel tape. Chalk serve as
our marker and the important details and field notes were written
in the field book.IV. ProceduresOur group met at the Engineering
Steps before proceeding to the Instruments Room on the 1st Floor to
borrow the necessary equipment. After waiting a few minutes for the
technician to arrive, we borrowed a steel tape. We then went to the
bike lane of the Academic Oval and started measuring a distance of
50 meters. We made sure that the tape was tout and straight when we
measured the distance and marked the starting point (A) and the
50-meter point (B) with a chalk. After putting down our bags and
anything of considerable weight, we fell in line on the starting
point and began pacing with each person following a few steps
behind the one in front of them. We then recorded the number of
steps it took to traverse the 50-meter distance. Once someone
reached Point B, he/she has to wait for the rest of the group to
join him/her at Point B, and vice versa. Afterwards, the group
would once again fall in line and start pacing in the same manner
as before. The purpose of this was to make sure that there was no
counterflow, which could affect our pace. We then repeated this
process for 10 trials and recorded our data in our field book.V.
DataThe following tables show the data for the lab exercise for
each member.1. Balomit , JeanineLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1730.6849315068
0.6808579953
BA273
500.6849315068
AB3750.666666667
BA4740.6756756757
AB571.50.6993006993
BA673.50.6802721088
AB7730.6849315068
BA873.50.6802721088
AB9750.666666667
BA10730.6849315068
2. Cacdac , ChristineLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1700.7142857143
0.6903073758
BA271
500.7042253521
AB3720.694444444
BA4720.694444444
AB5730.6849315068
BA6730.6849315068
AB7740.6756756757
BA8730.6849315068
AB973.50.6802721088
BA10730.6849315068
3. Corpuz, Pat LeriezzLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB170.50.7092198682
0.7145692468
BA270.5
500.7092198682
AB372.50.6896551724
BA471.50.6993006993
AB5710.7042253521
BA6680.7352941176
AB7700.7142857143
BA868.50.7299270073
AB9690.7246376812
BA1068.50.7299270073
4. Galope, ChristianLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1700.7142857143
0.724864885
BA265.5
500.7633587786
AB3720.694444444
BA4680.7352941176
AB5700.7142857143
BA6680.7352941176
AB7700.7142857143
BA869.750.7168458781
AB9700.7142857143
BA10670.746268567
5. Hokson , JALINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1710.7042253521
0.7263837095
BA268
500.7352941176
AB369.50.7194244604
BA469.50.7194244604
AB568.50.7299270073
BA668.50.7299270073
AB7680.7352941176
BA8680.7352941176
AB967.50.7407407407
BA10700.7142857143
6. Mendoza , Raul Jr.LINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB165.50.7633587786
0.775362223
BA263
500.7936507937
AB3630.7936507937
BA4650.7692307692
AB5640.78125
BA6650.7692307692
AB7640.78125
BA8660.7575757576
AB9650.7692307692
BA1064.50.7751937984
7. Monzon, Mary RoseiLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1700.7142857143
0.6969543905
BA271
500.7042253521
AB371.50.6993006993
BA471.50.6993006993
AB5720.694444444
BA6720.694444444
AB7730.6849315068
BA872.50.6896551724
AB972.50.6896551724
BA1071.50.6993006993
8. Olmedo, AyraLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1740.6756756757
0.6842106384
BA272
500.694444444
AB3720.694444444
BA4710.7042253521
AB5730.6849315068
BA6720.694444444
AB7740.6756756757
BA8750.666666667
AB9730.6849315068
BA10750.666666667
9. Pagapong, Kim LloydLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB160.50.826446281
0.8420913604
BA262
500.8064516129
AB3580.8620689655
BA459.50.8403361345
AB558.50.8547008547
BA659.50.8403361345
AB757.50.8695652174
BA859.50.8403361345
AB959.50.8403361345
BA1059.50.8403361345
10. Sollestre, JoelLINETRIALSNO. OF PACESTAPED
DITANCE(m)CORRESPONDING PACE FACTOR(m/pace)MEAN PACE
FACTOR(m/pace)
AB1780.641025641
0.6577009589
BA275.5
500.6622516556
AB375.50.6622516556
BA475.50.6622516556
AB578.50.6369426752
BA6750.666666667
AB7780.641025641
BA8740.6756756757
AB975.50.6622516556
BA10750.666666667
VI. ComputationsTo get the corresponding pace factor for every
trial, we used the equation Pace factor =
Using Kim Lloyd Pagapongs data, here is the computation of his
pace factor for trail 1
Pace Factor =
= 0.82644281
To get the Mean Pace Factor, We get the summation of the pace
factors of each person and divide it by the number if trials made.
0.82644621 + 0.8064516129 + 0.8620689655 + 0.8403361345 +
0.8547008547 + 0.8403361345 + 0.8695652174 + 0.8403361345 +
0.8403361345 + 0.840336134510
We used these equations to get the pace factors for every trail
of each member of the group and each ones mean pace factor (given
that there are 10 members in the group and 10 trials were performed
for each).VII. Results and ConclusionWe determined that the member
with the greatest pace factor was Kim Lloyd Pagapong with
0.8420913604 m/pace.VIII. Individual Contribution to the Final
ReportGalope and Hokson Editing and Proof readingOlmedo, Balomit,
Sollestre, Pagapong Objectives, Instruments Used, Results and
ConclusionCorpuz, Mozon, Cacdac, Mendoza Jr. Data Input and
Calculations
