Click here to load reader
Upload
try-muller
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Exploring the causal relationships within an the organizational work system using a non- profit FHIP program for a brief case study Prepared by Try L. Muller BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES 1 /20/2009
Citation preview
BUSINESS PERSPECTIVES
Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) System:
Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP)
Exploring the causal relationships within an the organizational work system using a non-profit FHIP program for a brief case study
Prepared by Try L. Muller 1 /20/2009
2
System Purpose
Piedmont Housing Alliance (PHA) is the area’s sole resource for fair housing. The Fair
Housing act of 1988 prohibits discrimination in the rental, sale and lending of housing
based on 8 protected classes: race, color, religion, national origin, gender, disability,
familial status and elderliness. The organizational system that regulates PHA’s Fair
Housing Program is essential to the worldwide and local efforts to end housing
discrimination. It regulates and supports the progress of PHA as a Fair Housing
Initiatives Program (FHIP). This is significant because it requires that PHA show how the
implementation of various programs has positive effects on the community. These
statistics and analysis must be put into a grant application for FHIP funding for the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Subsequently, PHA retains its
role as a HUD funded FHIP organization. The system is fundamental to both the Fair
Housing Program and the quality of living in the surrounding community.
Causal Loop Diagram: FHIP System
Optimal
Program
Performance
FHIP
Funding
Employee
Competency
Level
B
Implementation
Efficiency
Fair Housing
Enforcement
R
O
Availability
of training
seminars
O
S
S
S
S
S
3
System Components and Dynamics
The diagram depicts FHIP funding from HUD as the most pivotal factor in the
operational process. The FHIP funding assumes this role because PHA relies on this
money in order to be recognized as a Fair Housing Alliance. Without this funding from
HUD, the organization would have to submit multiple grant applications in order to
potentially receive the money they would get from a single grant.
The balancing loop
The balancing loop shows an initial reversal in the relationship between FHIP Funding to
the employee competency level. The employee competency level acts as a catalyst to the
FHIP funding as it reflects the overall efficiency of the program. The same can be said
for the time delay caused by the availability of educational seminars. If there are not
enough training opportunities, employee competency will not improve; in turn, affecting
funding. Yet, employee competency is directly related to the program’s performance.
The reinforcing Loop
The reinforcing loop is self explanatory. An increase in FHIP funding allows for quick
efficient implementation of various programs that have overhead costs. The efficient
implementation of programs in turn allows for more fair housing enforcement. The
programs set up property testing in order to catch violators of Fair Housing Law.
Effective enforcement then leads to the optimal program performance. Good program
performance incites more FHIP funding and more funding helps the organization fulfill
its role as a FHIP.