Upload
thais-mallet
View
269
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/26/2019 Gaymard & Poupon 1968
1/18
R E S P O N S E O F N E U T R O N
AND
FORMATION DENSITY LOGS
I N
HYDROCARBON BEA RIN G FORMATIONS
by
R. GAYMARD and A. POUPO N
SPE Sch lumberger - P a r i s
E DIT OR S NOT E : In t h i s i n t e r e s t i n g p ap e r t h e au t h o r s
co n s i d e r t h e e f f ec t o f r e s i d u a l h y d ro ca rb o n s o n t h e r e -
s p o n s e of t h e Neu t ro n an d F orm a t io n D en s i t y
logs
I t
s h o u l d b e o f i n t e r e s t t o t h o s e wo rki n g w i t h t h e s e po ro s-
i t y t o o ls . P o s s i b l e a p p l i c a t i o n s a r e i n c l u d e d fo r bo t h
s h a l y fo rm a t i o n s o r co m p l ex l i t h o l o g i e s .
ABSTRACT
I t is u s u a l l y a s s u m e d t h a t , i n o i l b ea r i n g fo rm a ti o n s,
t h e Neu t ro n a n d F o rm a t i o n Den s i t y l o g s are n o t s i g n i f i -
c a n t l y a f f ec t e d b y t h e r e s i d u a l o i l i n t h e i n v ad ed zo n e
an d t h a t t h ey r e s p o n d as if t h e v o l u m e i n v es t i g a t ed was
en t i re ly f i l l ed wi th mud f i l t ra te . However when poros i t i es
a r e f a i r l y h i g h, t h e e f f ec t of t h i s r e s i d u a l o i l
is
n o t
a l way s n eg l i g i b l e , p a r t i c u l a r l y if t h e oil is l igh t .
C o m p u t a t io n s h a v e b e e n m a d e t o e v a l u a t e t h i s e f f e c t.
F o rm u l ae h av e b een d ev e l o p ed fo r c l e an oil o r g a s
bear in g fo rmat ions . Th es e fo rmulae permi t a more acc u-
ra t e eva lua t io n of the poros i ty . Some of the fo rmulae may
a l s o h a v e a p p l i c a t i o n i n t h e cases of sha ly fo rmat ions
an d of co m p l ex l i t h o l o g i e s .
EFFECT OF HYDROCARBONS
ON TH E NEU TRON LOG
In Neutron logging, a s o u r c e e m i t s f a s t n e u t ro n s i n t o
t h e fo rm a t io n . T h es e n eu t ro n s a r e s l o wed d o wn th rou g h
co l l i s ions , mos t ly wi th hydrogen nucle i of t h e s u r ro u n d -
i n g m ed i u m , an d a f t e r r e ach i n g t h e s o -ca l l ed t h e rm a l
l e v e l of en e rgy , a r e ab s o rb ed b y n u c l e i of the fo rmat ion ,
u s u a l l y h y d ro g en o r ch l o r i n e n u c l e i; e a ch cap t u re o f a
thermal neu t ron
is
fo l lowed by th e emiss ion o f gamma-
ray s of c ap tu re . A d e t ec t o r , a t some d i s t an ce f ro m t h e
n eu tro n s o u rce , m eas u re s e i t h e r t h e g am m a-rays of
cap tu re (Neu t ron-Gamma type o f too l ) o r the thermal
neu t ron s (Neu t ron-Thermal Neu t ron too l ) o r the neu-
t ro n s b efo re t h ey h av e r each e d t h e th e rm a l l ev
(Neu t ron-Ep i thermal Neu t ron too l) . F or
all
t o o l s , t
s l o wi n g d o wn
of
t h e
fast
neu t rons by hydrogen nuc le i
th e p redominan t phenomenon , and th e read ing , fo r g iv
h o l e co n d i t i o n s , d ep en d s m o s t ly o n t h e h y dro gen i n d
of the fo rmat ion , p ropor t ional to the qu an t i ty
of
hydrog
per un i t vo lume of fo rmat ion near t he bor e ho le .
In c l e an wa t e r b ea r i n g fo rm a t io n s , t h e h y d rog e n
found in th e water on ly , and wi th a conce n t ra t ion whic
is prac t ica l ly independen t f rom the combined effects
t em p e ra t u re an d p r e s s u re ; in t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s t h e Neu tro
read i n g
is
d i rec t ly re la ted to poros i ty . Hydrocarbon
l i k e wa t e r , co n t a i n h y d ro g en, b u t a t v a r i a b l e co n cen t r
t i o n s wh i ch d ep en d m o s t l y o n t h e d en s i t y of the hydr
ca rb o n s i n s i t u . F o r some o i l s , t h e h y d ro g en co n cen t r
t i o n w i l l b e p r a c t ic a l l y t h e s a m e a s in w a t e r ; b ut g
an d l i g h t o i l h av e s u b s t an t i a l l y l o wer h y dro gen co n ce
t r a t i o n s . A s a r e s u l t th e p r e s en ce
of
g as , o r l i g h t
oil,
t h e v o l u m e of fo rmat ion near the bore ho le , is l i k e l y
h av e a s u b s t a n t i a l e f f e c t o n t h e Neu tro n r ead in g .
L e t S r h : res idua l hydrocarbon sa tu ra t ion in invade
z o n e
=
: h y d rog en i n d ex o f t h e h y d ro ca rb o n s
: hydrogen index o f th e mud f i l t ra te .
I f th e Neu tron log
is
ca l i b r a t ed i n f r e s h wa t e r b e a r i n
fo rmat ions , we can wri te :
Neut ron log
p o r o s i t y = +
[ a s , h +
p
(1-
S,,
) ]
(
T h e h y d rog en i n d e x o f f r e s h wa t e r is 1, by def in i t io
the hydrogen index o f a sod ium ch lo r ide so lu t ion
s o m ewh a t s m a l l e r t h an
1.
I t w i l l b e a s s u m e d i n t h e fo l l o wi n g t h a t t h e Neu tro
l o g
is
ca l ib ra te d through cross -p lo t s Neu t ron-Format io
Den s i t y o r Neu t ro n -R es i s t i v i ty i n wa t e r b ea r i n g i n t e
v a l s ; t h en o n e can wr it e :
a
4 N = $
[ p S h
+ 1
s,,]
(2
THE
L O G A N A L Y S T
3
7/26/2019 Gaymard & Poupon 1968
2/18
EFF ECT OF HYDROCARBONS
ON THE FORMATION DENSITY LOG
Compound
F o rmu la
f'b
________ -~
Quartz
510, 2.654
Ca lc 1 tc
CaCO,
2.710
Dolomi te CaCO, MgCO,
2.870
Anhydr i te CaSO, 2.960
F r e s h
water
H
1.000
Sa l t water
200,000 ppm 1.146
II(CH2) 0.8501I
I
G a m m a r a y s of f a i r l y h i g h e n e r g y l e v e l a r e e m i t t e d
by a r a d i o a c t i v e s o u r c e . T h e i r i n t e n s i t y i s g r a d u al l y
a t t e n u a t e d t hr ou g h c o l l i s i o n s w i t h t h e e l e c t r o n s i n t h e
f o rm a t i on ( C o m p to n e f f e c t ) . T h e S c h l u m b e r g e r F o r m a t i o n
D e n s i t y l o g i s b a s e d o n t h e m e a su r e m e n t of t h e g a m m a
r ay d e c a y e d i n t e n s i ty a t
a
g i v e n d i s t a n c e fro m t h e
s o u r c e .
C
0.9985
0.9991
0.9977
0.9990
1.1101
1.0797
1.1407
A s t h e C o m p t o n e f f e c t i s p r o p o r ti o n a l t o t h e n u m b e r of
e l e c t r o n s p e r u n i t v o l u m e a n d as, i n f i r s t a p p r o x i m a t i o n,
t h e n u m b e r of e l e c t r o n s p e r u n i t v o lu m e i s p ro p o r t io n a l t o
t h e d e n s i t y of t h e f o r m a t io n , i t i s c l e a r t h a t t h e l o g
r e s p o n d s t o t h e d e n s i t y
of
t h e f o r m a t i o n .
A c t u a l l y t h e n u m b e r o f e l e c t r o n s p e r u n i t v o l u m e i s
n o t e x a c t l y p r o p o r t io n a l t o t h e d e n s i t y . I n t h e case of a n
e l e m e n t , if w e c a l l p b t h e t r ue d e n s i t y a n d
pe
t h e ( ( e l e c -
t r o ni c d e n s it y ) ) t o w h i c h t h e s o n d e r e s p o n d s , i t c a n b e
s h o w n t h a t :
Z
Z
=
a t o m i c n u m b e r
A
A = a t o m i c w e i g h t
wi t h C = 2- w h e r e
S i m i l a r r e l a t i o n s h i p s e x i s t f o r c o m p o u n d s . pe d i f f e r s
f r o m
p b o n ly t o t h e e x t e n t t h a t C i s n o t e x a c t l y e q u a l
t o 1.
For m o s t of t h e e l e m e n t s a n d c o m p o u n d s f o u nd i n
s e d i m e n t a r y f o r m a t i o n s C i s v e r y c l o s e t o o n e , a s s h o w n
i n t a b l e s h e r e b el o w :
Element
H
C
N O
S I
C I
Ca
A
L
~
5 - 2 1
A
1.008
12.011
16.000
22.99
28.09
35.46
40.08
6
R
1 1
1 4
1.9841
,9991
1 oooo
,9569
,9968
,9588
,9980
T h e . r a t h e r l a r g e d e p a r t u r e f r o m 1 w h i c h a p p e a r s for
o i l a n d w a t e r i s d u e t o t h e p r e s e n c e of h y d r o g e n , t h e C
of
whi ch is a l m o s t e q u a l t o 2.
To c o p e w i t h t h i s p r o b le m t h e t o o l r e s p o n s e is
c a l i b r a t e d i n c l e a n f r e s h w a t e r b e a r i n g l i m e s t o n e s w i th
p o r o s i t i e s r a n g i n g f ro m z e r o t o 40%; i n f r e s h w a t e r
b e a r i n g d o l o m i t e s
or
s a n d s t o n e s , t h e e r r or r e s u l t i n g f rom
t h i s c a l i b r a t i o n is v e r y s m a l l , a n d e n t i r e l y n e g li g i d l e .
F o r f r e s h w a t e r b e a r in g l i m e s t o n e t h e s t a n d a r d f o r m ul a
r e l a t i n g d e n s i t y t o p o r o s i ty c a n b e w r i t te n b o t h f or t r u e
d e n s i t y a n d f o r e l e c t r o n i c d e n s i t y :
(5)
By vi r tue of formula
(3),
e q u a t i o n (5) wr i t es :
By e l i mi na t i ng 4 b e t w e e n
(4)
a n d (6), t h e n r e p l a c i n g
p L s ,
w ,
C I S a nd Cw b y t h e i r n u m e r i c a l v a l u e s , w e g e t :
p b =
1.07
p -
0.188
S i n c e t h e l o g i s c a l i b r a t e d in s u c h a w a y t h a t p
p b i n f r e s h w a t e r b e a r i n g l i m e s t o n e s , i t r e s u l t s t h a t :
=
l o g
P l o g = 1.07
p -
0.188 (7)
T h i s , t h e n , i s t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p , be t w e e n t h e e l e c t r o n i c
d e n s i t y a n d t h e r e a d in g
of
t h e F o r m a t i o n D e n s i t y l o g .
L e t u s n o w r e v e r t t o o u r p ro b l em a n d c o n s i d e r a c l e a n
h y d r o c a rb o n b e a r i n g f o r m a ti o n . T h e f l u id i n t h e i n v e s -
t i g at e d z o n e i s m a de u p of Srh
of
hydrocarbon and
(1 - S r h ) of mud f i l t r a t e . Equat i ons (7) a n d
(6)
w r i t e :
f l o g
1.07
p
- 0.188 (7)
w h e r e C m a p,,, Cm, m f a n d C h
p h
a r e r e s p e c t i v e l y t h e
e l e c t r o n i c d e n s i t i e s o f t h e m a t r i x , of t h e m ud f i l t r a t e a n d
of t h e h y d r o c a r b o n s .
By e l i mi na t i ng p , b e t w e e n
(7)
a n d (8), and no t i c i ng
t h a t :
= 1.07
Cma p,, -
0.188
p m o
4
S E P T E M B E R
-
OC T OB E R , 196
7/26/2019 Gaymard & Poupon 1968
3/18
w e g e t t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n pb ( log read ing) and 4
( t rue poros i ty ):
T h e ap p a ren t p o ro s i t y
$,,
d e r i v ed f ro m t h e Den s i t y
log , by def in i t ion :
p m a - pb
D
=
,
is
given by:
p m a
-
P m f
INFLUENCE OF MUD SAL INITY
T h e fo l lo wi n g p a ram e t e r s , u s ed i n fo rm u l ae (2 ) an d
( lo ) , depend on mud f i l t ra te sa l in i ty :
mud f i l t ra te hydrogen inde x ,
p m f m ud f i l t r a t e d en s i t y ,
C, pd
m ud f i l t r a t e e l e c t ro n i c d en s i t y .
We
s h a l l l i m i t o u r s t u d y t o t h e
case
where the mud
f i l t r a te c a n b e c o n s id e r e d as a p u re NaC l s o l u t i o n .
In t h e fo rm u l ae t h e f i l t r a t e s a l i n i t y w i l l b e g i v en a s
a funct ion of the parameter:
NaC l C o n cen t r a t i o n (p p m )
P =
1 ,000 ,000
T h e fo l l o wi n g ap p ro x i m a t e fo rm u l ae h av e b een
es-
b l i s h ed :
(11)
=
1 - . 4 P
pm f =
1 + . 7 P
(12)
Cmfpmf =
1.11
+ .65
P
(13)
INFLUENCE OF HYDROCARBON DENSITY
a.
On N e u t r o n log
In fo rmula (2 ) above (Neu t ron equat ion) D
is
t h e
hydrogen index of the hydrocar bons o r, more p re c i se l y ,
t h e r a t i o of the hydrogen con ten t per un i t vo lume of
hydrocarbons over tha t of water . I t can be shown tha t
D
is given by the fol lowing formula:
wh e re n H
is
the p roport ion of hydrogen by weight in the
hydrocarbons .
B y p l o tt i n g n H v s p h
for
a number of saturated hydro-
carbons (C,H,, ,) u n d e r av e ra g e r e s e rv o i r co n d i t i o n s ,
a n d a s s u m i ng t h e h e a v i e s t c o m p o n e n ts t o h a v e a d en s i
o f 0.9, we h a v e o b t a i n ed t h e fo l l owi n g em p i r i c a l f o rm u l
F o r m e t h a n e w h ic h h a s
a
dens i ty o f 0 .2
f 25%
u n d
m o s t of r e s e rv o i r co n d i t i o n s , t h e fo rm u la g i v e s n H =
0 .25 , the co rre c t f igu re ,
i f
o n e t a k e s
ph
= 0.2.
For
h eav y o i l ,
i.e. p h
=
0 .9 , t h e fo rm u l a g i v e s n H
0.15, which
is
a good approx imat ion s in ce the low
l i m i t .
fo r h eav y s a t u ra t ed h y d ro ca rb o n s
is:
1
7
--
- 0 , 1 4 3
B y e l i m i n a t i n g n H b e t ween (1 4 ) a n d (15), we o b t a
=
as a
funct ion of p ,only:
(16
2
a
= 9
p, f0.15
+
0.2
0.9-
p,)
1
Grap h i ca l s t u d y of t h i s t h ird d eg re e fu n c t io n s h o w
t h a t i t c a n r e a s o n ab l y b e a s s i m i l a t e d t o t w o d i f fe r e
l i n ea r fu n c t i o n s , d ep en d i n g o n t h e r a n g e of
P,
v a l u e
(s e e f ig . 1 ) :
-
i f
0 .2 5
p h