Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Short title: 1
CrPIF1–CrGATA1 regulate vindoline biosynthesis 2
3
Corresponding authors: Ling Yuan and Sitakanta Pattanaik, Department of Plant and Soil 4
Sciences and Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center, University of Kentucky, 5
Lexington, KY, USA. 6
Email: [email protected] and [email protected] 7
Phone: 859-257-4806; 859-257-1976 8
Fax: 859-323-1077 9
10
GATA and PIF transcription factors regulate light-induced vindoline biosynthesis in 11
Catharanthus roseus 12
13
Yongliang Liu1,2 #, Barunava Patra2, #, Sitakanta Pattanaik2, Ying Wang1 and Ling Yuan1, 2 14
15
1Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic 16
Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, PR 17
China 18
2Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development 19
Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA 20
# These authors have contributed equally to this work. 21
One sentence summary: 22
A regulatory module consisting of Phytochrome Interacting Factor (PIF) and GATA transcription 23
factors regulates light-induced vindoline biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus seedlings. 24
Author contribution: 25
L.Y., B.P., S.P. and Y.W. designed the research; Y.L., B.P., and S.P. performed experiments; Y.L. 26
and B.P. analyzed data; and Y.L., B.P. S.P., Y.W. and L.Y. wrote the manuscript. 27
28
Funding information: 29
This work is supported partially by the Harold R. Burton Endowed Professorship to L.Y. and by 30
the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement no. 1355438 to L.Y. 31
32
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on May 13, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.19.00489
Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on May 13, 2019, as DOI:10.1104/pp.19.00489
Copyright 2019 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
ABSTRACT 33
Catharanthus roseus is the exclusive source of an array of terpenoid indole alkaloids including 34
the anticancer drugs vincristine and vinblastine, derived from the coupling of catharanthine and 35
vindoline. Leaf-synthesized vindoline is regulated by light. A seven-step enzymatic process is 36
involved in the sequential conversion of tabersonine to vindoline; however, the regulatory 37
mechanism controlling expression of genes encoding these enzymes has not been elucidated. 38
Here, we identified CrGATA1, an LLM-domain GATA transcription factor that regulates light-39
induced vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus seedlings. Expression of CrGATA1 and the vindoline 40
pathway genes T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H, and DAT was significantly induced by light. In addition, 41
CrGATA1 activated the promoters of five light-responsive vindoline pathway genes in plant 42
cells. Two GATC-motifs in the D4H promoter were critical for CrGATA1-mediated 43
transactivation. Transient overexpression of CrGATA1 in C. roseus seedlings resulted in 44
upregulation of vindoline pathway genes and increased vindoline accumulation. Conversely, 45
virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of CrGATA1 in young C. roseus leaves significantly 46
repressed key vindoline pathway genes and reduced vindoline accumulation. Furthermore, we 47
showed that a C. roseus Phytochrome Interacting Factor, CrPIF1, is a repressor of CrGATA1 and 48
vindoline biosynthesis. Transient overexpression or VIGS of CrPIF1 in C. roseus seedlings 49
altered CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway gene expression in the dark. CrPIF1 repressed 50
CrGATA1 and DAT promoter activity by binding to G/E-box/PBE elements. Our findings reveal 51
a regulatory module involving PIF–GATA that governs light-mediated biosynthesis of 52
specialized metabolites. 53
54
Key words: GATA transcription factor, phytochrome interacting factor (PIF), vindoline 55
biosynthesis, transcriptional regulation, Catharanthus roseus. 56
57
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
INTRODUCTION 58
Catharanthus roseus (Madagascar periwinkle) is the unique source of more than hundred of 59
terpenoid indole alkaloids (TIAs) including the two anticancer drugs, vincristine and vinblastine. 60
Biosynthesis of TIAs (Supplemental Fig. S1) starts with the production of strictosidine, which is 61
formed by the condensation of the terpenoid precursor secologanin and the indole precursor 62
tryptamine (Courdavault et al., 2014; Pan et al., 2016; Thamm et al., 2016). Strictosidine serves 63
as a universal precursor for various TIAs, including ajmalicine, serpentine, catharanthine, and 64
tabersonine. Tabersonine is sequentially converted to vindoline by a seven-step enzymatic 65
process, and genes encoding the seven enzymes have been characterized (Vazquez-Flota et al., 66
1997; St-Pierre et al., 1998; Levac et al., 2008; Liscombe et al., 2010; Besseau et al., 2013; Qu et 67
al., 2015). Vincristine and vinblastine are derived from coupling of vindoline and catharanthine. 68
Expression of TIA biosynthetic pathway genes in four different cell types is elicited by 69
environmental cues and phytohormones (Courdavault et al., 2014). 70
71
In C. roseus, a number of transcription factors (TFs) regulate TIA biosynthesis. These TFs 72
include the Apetala2/Ethylene Response Factors (AP2/ERFs) ORCA2/3/4/5 and CR1 (Menke et 73
al., 1999; van der Fits and Memelink, 2000; Pan et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017; 74
Paul et al., 2017), basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TFs CrMYC2, BIS1/2, and RMT1 (Zhang et al., 75
2011; Van Moerkercke et al., 2015; Van Moerkercke et al., 2016; Patra et al., 2018), Cys2/His2-76
type zinc finger proteins ZCT1/2/3 (Pauw et al., 2004), MYB-like factor CrBPF1 (van der Fits et 77
al., 2000; Li et al., 2015), G-box binding factors CrGBF1/2 (Sibéril et al., 2001; Sui et al., 2018), 78
WRKY TF CrWRKY1 (Suttipanta et al., 2011), and the jasmonate ZIM-domain (JAZ) proteins 79
(Patra et al., 2018). ORCA3, ORCA4 and ORCA5, which form a physical cluster, regulate a 80
number of genes in the TIA pathway through overlapping yet distinct mechanisms (van der Fits 81
and Memelink, 2000; Paul et al., 2017). CrMYC2 activates ORCA3 by binding to a qualitative 82
sequence in the promoter (Zhang et al., 2011), whereas it indirectly activates ORCA4 and 83
ORCA5 (Paul et al., 2017). In addition, CrMYC2 interacts with CrGBF1 and CrGBF2 to 84
modulate TIA biosynthesis (Sui et al., 2018). The CrMYC2–ORCA cascade has limited effects 85
on expression of genes in the iridoid branch of TIA pathway. However, a recent study has 86
demonstrated that transient overexpression of a de-repressed CrMYC2 (CrMYC2D126N
) in C. 87
roseus flower petals significantly activates expression of iridoid pathway genes (Schweizer et al., 88
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
2018). BIS1 and BIS2 are major regulators of the iridoid pathway (Van Moerkercke et al., 2015; 89
Van Moerkercke et al., 2016). Transient overexpression of CrMYC2D126N
, BIS1, and ORCA3 90
significantly induce the indole and iridoid pathway genes, resulting in increased accumulation of 91
strictosidine, 16-hydroxytabersonine, and horhammericine (Schweizer et al., 2018). The bHLH 92
TF RMT1 and JAZ proteins mediate crosstalk between iridoid and terpenoid pathways to 93
balance TIA accumulation (Patra et al., 2018). However, our knowledge is limited on regulation 94
of genes involved in the sequential conversion of tabersonine to vindoline in C. roseus leaves. 95
Combinatorial overexpression of wild-type or de-repressed CrMYC2 (CrMYC2D126N
), along with 96
BIS1 and/or ORCA3 does not induce the expression of vindoline pathway genes (Schweizer et al., 97
2018), suggesting that other TFs are likely involved in regulation of the vindoline pathway. 98
99
In C. roseus, while tabersonine is produced in leaves and roots, vindoline production is leaf-100
specific and light dependent (De Luca et al., 1986). In addition, previous studies suggest that the 101
conversion of tabersonine to vindoline is phytochrome dependent (Aerts and De Luca, 1992). 102
Light regulates a myriad of physiological and developmental processes in plants, including 103
photoperiodism, photomorphogenesis, seed germination and shade-avoidance (Jiao et al., 2007). 104
Light also plays crucial roles in biosynthesis of specialized metabolites. The TFs in bHLH, basic 105
leucine zipper (bZIP), and GATA families are known to control light-responsive gene expression 106
in plants (Richter et al., 2010; Toledo-Ortiz et al., 2014; Klermund et al., 2016). GATA TFs, 107
widely distributed in eukaryotes, are characterized by the class IV zinc finger motif (CX2CX17-108
20CX2C) (Lowry and Atchley, 2000). In Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa), GATA TFs are 109
divided into four conserved and distinct classes, A through D (Reyes et al., 2004). Class B 110
GATAs (B-GATAs) are further sub-divided into two families based on the presence of conserved 111
LLM (Leucine-Leucine-Methionine) domain or HAN (HANABA TARANU) domain (Behringer 112
and Schwechheimer, 2015). In Arabidopsis, expression of two homologous LLM B-GATAs, 113
GNC (GATA-nitrate-inducible-carbon metabolism-involved) and GNL (GNC-like/cytokinin-114
responsive GATA factor 1), is induced by light known to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis, 115
chloroplast development, nitrate metabolism, seed germination, flowering time, hypocotyl 116
elongation, and stomata development (Richter et al., 2010; Hudson et al., 2013; Richter et al., 117
2013a; Richter et al., 2013b; Klermund et al., 2016; Ranftl et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017; Bastakis 118
et al., 2018). In addition to GATA TFs, a small group of bHLH TFs, the Phytochrome Interacting 119
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
Factors (PIFs) play crucial role in light-responsive gene expression and downstream biological 120
processes through interacting with phytochromes in plants (Leivar and Monte, 2014). 121
Phytochromes are the receptor of red and far-red light signals and exist in either the inactive Pr 122
form or the active Pfr form (Pham et al., 2018). PIFs physically interact with the active Pfr, 123
leading to degradation by the 26S/ubiquitin proteasome system (26S/UPS). The PIF degradation 124
triggers massive transcriptional reprogramming that regulates various biological processes 125
(Leivar and Monte, 2014; Paik et al., 2017). Light-mediated anthocyanin accumulation in 126
Arabidopsis is regulated by PIFs (Shin et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2015). In Arabidopsis, GNC and 127
GNL are direct targets of PIFs in the regulation of seed germination, flowering time, hypocotyl 128
elongation, and stomata development (Richter et al., 2010; Klermund et al., 2016; Ranftl et al., 129
2016). In fungi, GATA-type TF Csm1 has been reported to regulate biosynthesis of the red 130
pigments bikaverin and fusarubins in Fusarium fujikuroi (Niehaus et al., 2017); it is unclear, 131
however, whether GATA TFs are involved in the regulation of specialized metabolite 132
biosynthesis in plants. 133
134
The light and phytochrome dependent nature of vindoline biosynthesis led us to hypothesize that 135
a light-associated transcriptional cascade is involved in the conversion of tabersonine to 136
vindoline in C. roseus seedlings. In this study, we characterized a light-induced C. roseus LLM 137
domain B-GATA, termed CrGATA1, which predominantly expresses in the leaf. CrGATA1 138
activates the promoters of key vindoline biosynthetic genes in plant cells. In addition, transient 139
overexpression or virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of CrGATA1 in C. roseus seedlings 140
significantly altered vindoline pathway gene expression and vindoline accumulation. We also 141
demonstrated that a C. roseus PIF (CrPIF1) acts as an upstream negative regulator of CrGATA1, 142
resulting in repression of vindoline biosynthetic genes in the dark. De-repression of CrGATA1, 143
presumably through degradation of CrPIF1 under light, leads to increased accumulation of 144
vindoline. Our findings reveal a previously uncharacterized regulatory module in C. roseus 145
involving PIF-GATA that governs light-induced vindoline biosynthesis in seedlings. 146
147
Results 148
Vindoline pathway is induced by light in C. roseus seedlings 149
Conversion of tabersonine to vindoline is responsive to developmental as well as environmental 150
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
cues, such as light, in C. roseus seedlings (De Luca et al., 1986). Of the seven genes involved in 151
the conversion, expression of deacetylvindoline-4-O-acetyltransferase (DAT) and 152
desacetoxyvindoline-4-hydroxylase (D4H) is induced by light (Vazquez-Flota et al., 1997; St-153
Pierre et al., 1998; Vazquez-Flota and De Luca, 1998). To determine the light-responsive 154
expression of tabersonine–vindoline conversion genes and alkaloid accumulation, seven-day-old 155
etiolated C. roseus seedlings were exposed to continuous white light for 1h, 4h, 10h, 24h, 48h, 156
and 96h, and the aerial parts of the seedlings were collected for gene expression and alkaloids 157
analysis. Expression of tabersonine-16-hydroxylase 2 (T16H2), tabersonine-3-oxygenase (T3O), 158
D4H, and DAT showed gradual increase upon exposure to light that peaked at 24h. Expression 159
of tabersonine-3-reductase (T3R) was highest at 48h of light treatment and declined thereafter 160
(Fig. 1A). However, expression of 16-hydroxytabersonine-O-methyltransferase (16OMT) and 3-161
hydroxy-16-methoxy-2,3-dihydrotabersonine N-methyltransferase (NMT) did not significantly 162
change in response to light (Fig. 1A), which corroborates with earlier studies showing the 163
activities of 16OMT and NMT were less sensitive to light (St-Pierre and De Luca, 1995; Levac 164
et al., 2008). We also measured the expression of two upstream TIA pathway genes 165
(Supplemental Fig. S1), tryptophan decarbxylase (TDC) and strictosidine synthase (STR), in 166
dark- and light-treated seedlings. In contrast to the rapid light induction for the vindoline 167
pathway genes (within 4 h), expression of TDC and STR did not significantly change by light-168
treatment up to 24 h (Supplemental Fig. S2A). In addition, we compared catharanthine, 169
tabersonine, and vindoline in etiolated and light-treated C. roseus seedlings. We did not observe 170
significant differences in catharanthine accumulation between dark- and light-treated seedlings 171
(Supplemental Fig. S2B). However, we detected a significant increase of vindoline and a 172
decrease of tabersonine in seedlings exposed to light for 24 and 96 h (Fig. 1B). We also 173
compared levels of catharanthine, tabersonine, and vindoline in normal, 11-day-old C. roseus 174
seedlings grown under continuous light to those of dark-grown seedlings exposed to light. We 175
found that vindoline levels were significantly higher in light grown seedlings (Supplemental Fig. 176
S2C) compared to the etiolated ones exposed to light for 24 and 96 h (Fig. 1B). Taken together, 177
the results suggest that expression of five of the seven vindoline pathway genes and vindoline 178
accumulation in C. roseus seedlings are light-inducible. 179
180
181
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
Putative light-responsive cis-elements are present in the promoters of light-inducible 182
vindoline pathway genes 183
The light-inducible expression of the five vindoline pathway genes prompted us to analyze their 184
promoters for presence of putative light-responsive cis-elements. We therefore retrieved the 185
promoter sequences (2kb upstream of the first ATG of coding frame) of the five light-responsive 186
genes, T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H, and DAT, from the Medicinal Plant Genomics Resource (MPGR; 187
http://medicinalplantgenomics.msu.edu/) and scanned the promoter sequences using PlantCARE 188
(Lescot et al., 2002). We identified multiple known light responsive cis-elements, of which the 189
GATA, Box 4, and Box I motifs are present in the promoters of all five light-responsive 190
vindoline pathway genes (Supplemental Table S1). GATA and GATC cis-elements were also 191
found in the promoters of two upstream vindoline pathway genes, TDC and STR, although their 192
expression were not significantly induced by light. The GATA-motif, consisting of W-G-A-T-A-193
R sequence (in which W denotes A or T, and R denotes A or G), and the GATC-motif are 194
binding sites for light-inducible GATA TFs (Lowry and Atchley, 2000; Newton et al., 2001; 195
Sugimoto et al., 2003; Manfield et al., 2007). Although the Box 4 and Box I elements have been 196
identified to be present in many promoters of light-inducible genes, the TFs targeting these 197
elements are unclear. Therefore, we focused on GATA family TFs of C. roseus for their potential 198
roles in regulating light-inducible vindoline biosynthesis. 199
200
CrGATA1 is light-inducible and co-expressed with vindoline pathway genes 201
We identified 24 putative GATA TFs in C. roseus genome. We next used C. roseus 202
transcriptomic resources (Góngora-Castillo et al., 2012) (Accession no. SRA030483) to perform 203
co-expression analysis of GATA TFs and genes involved in vindoline biosynthesis. Hierarchical 204
cluster analysis of the putative GATA TFs and the five light-inducible vindoline pathway genes 205
reveled that two GATA TFs (CRO_T134526 and CRO_T117711) are tightly co-expressed with 206
the vindoline pathway genes (Supplemental Fig. S3). Quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) was 207
performed to measure the expression of two GATA TFs and vindoline pathway genes in arial 208
parts and roots of C. roseus seedlings. As shown in Figure 2A, the vindoline pathway genes, as 209
well as CRO_T134526 and CRO_T117711, are preferentially expressed in aerial parts of the 210
seedlings (Fig. 2A). Expression of CRO_T134526 and CRO_T117711 were also measured in C. 211
roseus seedlings exposed to light for 1h, 4h, 10h, 24h, 48h, and 96h. Under light-treatment, only 212
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
CRO_T134526 expression was induced (Fig. 2B) and peaked at 4h, while CRO_T117711 was 213
repressed (Fig. 2C). Next, we cloned the CRO_T134526 promoter to drive the expression of the 214
GUS reporter gene. Two light-dependent (D4H and DAT) and a light-independent (CaMV35S) 215
promoters driving the expression of GUS reporter were used as controls. The promoter-GUS 216
reporter plasmids were used for Agro-infiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. GUS 217
activities were measured in discs of infiltrated leaves collected from dark or light incubated 218
plants. As shown in Fig. 2D, the GUS activity in light-treated leaves, infiltrated with CrGATA1-219
GUS, D4H-GUS or DAT-GUS, was significantly (3-4-fold) higher than that of the dark incubated 220
plants; however, we did not observe significant change of GUS activity in CaMV35S-GUS-221
infiltrated leaves of light or dark incubated plants, suggesting that the CRO_T134526 promoter is 222
light inducible. We selected CRO_T134526, hereafter designated as CrGATA1, for further 223
characterization and to elucidate its regulatory role in light-regulated vindoline biosynthesis. 224
225
Phylogenetic analysis showed that CrGATA1 is in the same clade with the light-inducible 226
Arabidopsis GATA TFs GNC and GNL (Supplemental Fig. S4) (Manfield et al., 2007; 227
Behringer and Schwechheimer, 2015). Like GNC and GNL, CrGATA1 belongs to LLM-domain 228
containing B-GATAs. Amino acid sequence alignment revealed that CrGATA1 shares 39-41% 229
sequence identity with Arabidopsis GATA TFs, GNC and GNL (Supplemental Fig. S5). To 230
determine the sub-cellular localization, CrGATA1 was fused in-frame to eGFP (enhanced GFP), 231
and the fusion gene was expressed in tobacco (N. tabacum) protoplasts. While the control eGFP 232
accumulated throughout the cell, CrGATA1-eGFP fusion protein was localized to the nucleus 233
(Fig. 2E). 234
235
Transient overexpression of CrGATA1 enhances vindoline production in C. roseus seedlings 236
To determine the role of CrGATA1 in vindoline biosynthesis, we transiently overexpressed 237
CrGATA1 in C. roseus seedlings using the FAST method (Weaver et al., 2014). Expression of 238
CrGATA1 and the five light-responsive vindoline pathway genes were measured in the aerial 239
parts of young seedlings infiltrated either with the empty-vector control pCAMBIA1300 (EV) or 240
the overexpression-vector pCAMBIA1300-CrGATA1 (CrGATA1-OX). The RT-qPCR results 241
reveled that, compared to EV, CrGATA1 overexpression resulted in 2.5- to 5-fold increase in the 242
expression of T16H2, D4H, and DAT; expression of T3O and T3R remained unchanged (Fig. 3A). 243
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
In addition, vindoline accumulation was significantly increased, while tabersonine was decreased, 244
in CrGATA1-OX seedlings relative to EV seedlings (Fig. 3B). These findings suggest that 245
CrGATA1 is a positive regulator of vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus. 246
247
VIGS of CrGATA1 reduces vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus leaves 248
VIGS was used to repress CrGATA1 expression in C. roseus leaves as previously described 249
(Liscombe and O’Connor, 2011). Expression of CrGATA1 and the five light-responsive 250
vindoline pathway genes were measured in young leaves of C. roseus plants inoculated either 251
with the pTRV2 empty-vector control (EV) or the VIGS vector pTRV2-CrGATA1 (CrGATA1-252
VIGS). We observed that CrGATA1 expression was repressed approximately by 63% in VIGS 253
leaves compared to the EV control (Fig. 3C). In addition, transcript levels of T3O, T3R, and DAT 254
were reduced by 43% - 58% in VIGS leaves compared to EV (Fig. 3C). Expression of T16H2 255
and D4H were not significantly affected in CrGATA1 VIGS lines. Moreover, the amount of 256
tabersonine was significantly elevated while vindoline was decreased in leaves of the CrGATA1-257
VIGS plants compared to the EV plants (Fig. 3D). The results further support that CrGATA1 is a 258
positive regulator of vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus. To determine whether CrGATA1 259
affects expression of the upstream vindoline pathway genes, we measured the expression of TDC 260
and STR in CrGATA1 overexpression and VIGS lines. We did not detect significant changes in 261
transcript levels compared to EV (Supplemental Fig. S6). 262
263
CrGATA1 transactivates the promoters of vindoline pathway genes 264
To determine whether CrGATA1 can directly activate the promoters of vindoline pathway genes, 265
we performed N. benthamiana leaf-based transactivation assays. The promoters of five light-266
inducible vindoline pathway genes were cloned in the binary vector pKYLX71-GUS to drive the 267
expression of GUS gene. The resulting plasmids were mobilized to A. tumefaciens and 268
individually infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves together with EV (pCAMBIA1300) or 269
pCAMBIA1300-CrGATA1. GUS activity assay showed that transactivation of the T16H2, T3R, 270
T3O, D4H, and DAT promoters by CrGATA1 were 1.8-2.9 folds compared to EV control (Fig. 271
4A), suggesting that the vindoline pathway genes are regulated by CrGATA1 in C. roseus. 272
273
274
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
GATC-motif is crucial for CrGATA1 activation of the D4H promoter 275
Previous studies have demonstrated that GATA TFs bind to both GATA and GATC motifs 276
(Newton et al., 2001; Sugimoto et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2017). The D4H promoter, highly 277
activated by CrGATA1 (Fig. 4A), was thus chosen for identification of potential binding sites of 278
CrGATA1. In silico analysis revealed that the D4H promoter contains two GATA and two 279
GATC motifs (Fig. 4B and C). First, we mutated the core sequence of the two GATA-motifs (-280
431 to -426 and -139 to -134, relative to first ATG in coding frame) to GGCA by PCR-based 281
site-directed mutagenesis (Pattanaik et al., 2010). Mutation of single or both GATA-motifs had 282
no effect on CrGATA1-mediated activation of the D4H promoter (Fig. 4B). However, 283
transactivation of the D4H promoter by CrGATA1 was abolished when both GATC-motifs (-617 284
to -614 and -541 to -538, relative to ATG) were mutated to GAAA, (Fig. 4C), suggesting that 285
GATC-motifs are crucial for activation of the D4H promoter by CrGATA1. 286
287
Phytochrome is likely involved in light-responsive expression of vindoline pathway genes 288
Plants sense red and far-red light signals through the photoreceptor phytochrome (Franklin and 289
Quail, 2010). Previous studies have shown that the red-light induced enzymatic activities of D4H 290
and DAT in C. roseus seedlings are reversed by far-red light (Aerts and De Luca, 1992; 291
Vazquez-Flota and De Luca, 1998), suggesting a phytochrome-dependent regulation of vindoline 292
biosynthesis. To test this hypothesis, expression of CrGATA1 and five light-inducible vindoline 293
pathway genes were monitored in C. roseus seedlings exposed red and then far-red light for 294
different durations. We used C. roseus ChlH, PORC and RCA as experimental controls, as their 295
orthologs in Arabidopsis and rice respond to red and far-red light in a phytochrome-dependent 296
manner (Liu et al., 1996; Moon et al., 2008; Inagaki et al., 2015) (Fig. 5). Gene expression 297
analysis showed that red light significantly induced the expression of CrGATA1 and vindoline 298
pathway genes, except for D4H (Fig. 5). The red light-mediated induction of vindoline pathway 299
genes was reversed following a two-hour exposure to far-red light (Fig. 5), suggesting the 300
involvement of phytochrome-dependent regulatory factors in the vindoline pathway. 301
302
CrPIF1 represses vindoline pathway gene expression and alkaloid accumulation in C. 303
roseus seedlings 304
PIFs act as negative regulators in light signaling pathway. PIF accumulates in dark and degrades 305
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
upon interaction with phytochromes in light (Pham et al., 2018). We thus asked whether C. 306
roseus PIFs are involved in the light regulation of vindoline biosynthesis. We identified three 307
putative PIFs in the C. roseus genome, designated here as CrPIF1, CrPIF3 and CrPIF4/5. CrPIFs 308
share 35-41% amino acid sequence identity with Arabidopsis PIF1, PIF3 and PIF4, while they 309
share 52-60% identity with tomato PIFs (Supplemental Fig. S7). In addition, C. roseus PIFs are 310
phylogenetically closer to tomato PIFs than those of Arabidopsis (Supplemental Fig. S8). Amino 311
acid sequence alignment of PIFs (Supplemental Fig. S7) showed that all three CrPIFs contain the 312
conserved bipartite nucleus localization signal (NLS) and phytochrome B binding (APB) motif, 313
indicating their conserved regulatory roles in phytochrome-PIF pathway in plants. Simiar to the 314
tomato PIFs (Rosado et al., 2016), CrPIFs appeared to be also regulated at transcriptional level 315
as their expression were affected by light (Supplemental Fig. S9). To determine the regulatory 316
roles of CrPIFs in vindoline biosynthesis, CrPIFs were individually overexpressed in C. roseus 317
seedlings using the FAST method. CrPIF1 overexpression resulted in significant downregulation 318
of CrGATA1 and the light-responsive vindoline pathway genes in dark (Fig. 6A). However, 319
CrPIF3 or CrPIF4/5 had no effects on the expression of CrGATA1 and the vindoline pathway 320
genes (Supplemental Fig. S10). In addition, overexpression of CrPIF1 resulted in increased 321
tabersonine and decreased vindoline (Fig. 6B), indicating that CrPIF1 acts a negative regulator of 322
vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus. To determine the sub-cellular localization, CrPIF1 was 323
fused in-frame to eGFP (enhanced GFP), and the resulting CrPIF1-eGPF was expressed in 324
tobacco protoplasts. While the control eGFP accumulated throughout the cell, the CrPIF1-eGFP 325
fusion protein was localized to the nucleus (Fig. 6E). 326
327
VIGS of CrPIF1 increases vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus leaves 328
VIGS was used to repress CrPIF1 expression in young C. roseus leaves. Expression of CrPIF1, 329
CrGATA1, and the five light-responsive vindoline pathway genes (T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H, and 330
DAT) were measured in leaves of the dark-incubated VIGS plants. Plants inoculated with the 331
pTRV2 empty-vector (EV) served as control. CrPIF1 expression was repressed by approximately 332
70% in VIGS leaves compared to the EV control (Fig. 6C). CrPIF1-silencing resulted in 333
upregulation of CrGATA1 and five vindoline pathway genes by 2-8 folds in VIGS lines 334
compared to EV (Fig. 6C). Moreover, the amount of vindoline was elevated in leaves of the 335
CrPIF1-VIGS plants compared to the EV plants (Fig. 6D). These results further suggest that 336
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
CrPIF1 is a negative regulator of vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus seedlings. 337
CrPIF1 represses CrGATA1 and DAT through binding to the G/E/PBE-box 338
To determine whether CrGATA1 and the vindoline pathway genes are regulated by CrPIF1, we 339
performed transactivation assays in N. benthamiana leaves. The CrGATA1 promoter was cloned 340
into the plasmid pKYLX71-GUS to drive the expression of GUS gene. The GUS reporter 341
plasmids driven by the promoters of CrGATA1 and five vindoline pathway genes were 342
individually infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves together with either EV (pCAMBIA1300) or 343
pCAMBIA1300-CrPIF1. We observed that promoter activities of CrGATA1, T16H2, and DAT 344
were significantly repressed (40-50%) by CrPIF1 in dark (Fig. 6F), suggesting that CrPIF1 is a 345
repressor of the vindoline pathway. It is well documented that PIFs bind to G-box (CACGTG) or 346
PBE-box (CACATG/CATGTG) in the target promoters (Zhang et al., 2013). We identified a G-347
box (-142 to -137 relative to first ATG) in the CrGATA1 promoter (Fig. 6G) and a PBE-box (-348
1106 to -1101 relative to first ATG) in DAT promoter (Fig. 6H). The G-box in the CrGATA1 349
promoter and PBE-box (CACATG) in the DAT promoter were mutated to CAAAAG and 350
CACAAA, respectively. Transactivation assays using N. benthamiana leaves were performed to 351
evaluate the effects of CrPIF1 on the mutated CrGATA1 and DAT promoters. We found that the 352
repressive effect of CrPIF1 on the CrGATA1 and DAT promoters was abolished by mutations in 353
G-box and PBE-box, respectively (Fig. 6G and 6H). These findings suggest that CrPIF1 354
represses the activities of CrGATA1 and DAT likely by binding to the G-box or PBE-box motifs 355
in the promoters. 356
357
DISCUSSION 358
TIA biosynthesis in C. roseus is a highly complex and elaborated process that involves more than 359
30 different enzymes, multiple cell types and sub-cellular compartments. A number of TFs 360
regulating biosynthesis of TIAs, such as strictosidine that serve as precursor of tabersonine and 361
catharanthine, have been characterized (Menke et al., 1999; van der Fits and Memelink, 2000; 362
Suttipanta et al. 2011; Zhang et al., 2011; Pan et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Van Moerkercke et al., 363
2015; Van Moerkercke et al., 2016; Paul et al., 2017; Patra et al., 2018; Schweizer et al., 2018; 364
Sui et al. 2018). By comparison, our knowledge on transcriptional regulation of the vindoline 365
pathway and light-mediated TIA biosynthesis is extremely limited. Here, we identified and 366
characterized CrGATA1 and CrPIF1 for their roles in regulating vindoline biosynthesis in C. 367
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
roseus seedlings. 368
369
TIA biosynthesis is developmentally regulated and is influenced by environmental cues, such as 370
light. Tabersonine is present in both leaves and roots, whereas vindoline is predominantly found 371
in leaves (De Luca et al., 1986). Moreover, dark-grown, etiolated C. roseus seedlings accumulate 372
trace amount of vindoline which increases upon exposure to light. Correspondingly, the dark-373
grown seedlings accumulate a significant amount of tabersonine which declines upon exposure 374
to light (De Luca et al. 1986). In addition, light induces the expression of D4H and DAT and their 375
enzymatic activities in C. roseus seedlings (De Luca et al., 1986; De Carolis et al., 1990; 376
Vazquez-Flota and De Luca, 1998; St-Pierre et al., 1998). Our gene expression analysis revealed 377
that, in addition to D4H and DAT, expression of T16H2, T3O, and T3R are significantly induced 378
by light in C. roseus seedlings (Fig. 1A). In addition, the increase of vindoline accumulation is 379
accompanied by the decrease of tabersonine upon exposure to light (Fig. 1B), further confirming 380
the role of light in vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus seedlings. Light is also known to affect the 381
biosynthesis of other specialized metabolites, including SGA in tomato (Wang et al., 2018) and 382
anthocyanins in a number of plant species (Liu et al. 2018). Consistent with leaf-specific 383
vindoline accumulation, CrGATA1 and the five light-responsive vindoline pathway genes are 384
preferentially expressed in areal parts of the seedling (Fig. 2A). The leaf-specific expression of 385
CrGATA1 and the vindoline pathway genes relative to those in roots (Fig. 2A) are significantly 386
higher than light-induced expression in the seedling (Fig. 1A and Fig. 2B), because the basal 387
expression of these genes in roots are extremely low. 388
Cis-regulatory elements present in the gene promoters of metabolic pathways often provide clues 389
about the potential TFs involved in the regulatory network and have been used as a tool for 390
identification of regulators. For instance, CrMYC2 was initially isolated using the G-box element 391
present in C. roseus STR promoter and later demonstrated as a regulator of TIA biosynthesis 392
(Zhang et al. 2011; Schweizer et al., 2018; Sui et al. 2018). The presence of AT-rich motifs in the 393
jasmonate-responsive element (JRE) of the ORCA3 promoter led to the identification of the AT-394
hook regulators in C. roseus (Vom Endt et al., 2007). In addition, presence of putative MYB 395
binding sites in a betalain pathway gene promoter (Polturak and Aharoni, 2018) and G-box/G-396
box-like sequences in tomato SGA biosynthetic pathway genes (Cárdenas et al., 2016) indicate 397
the possible involvement of MYBs and MYC2, respectively, in the pathway regulations. Two 398
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
R2R3 MYBs have since been identified as regulators of betalain biosynthesis in beet (Polturak 399
and Aharoni, 2018). Our analysis of the vindoline pathway gene promoters revealed the presence 400
of a number of light-responsive elements, including the GATA/GATC and G/E-box motifs 401
(Supplementary Table S1). The presence of GATA/GATC motifs in the five light-responsive 402
promoters in vindoline biosynthetic pathway led us to speculate that GATA family TFs are 403
involved in the light regulation of vindoline biosynthesis. In addition, we noticed the presence of 404
G/E-box that are recognized by bHLH TFs, including PIFs, that are known to be involved in 405
light-responsive gene expression in plants (Yadav et al., 2005; Pham et al., 2018). 406
407
Transcriptomic and genomic resources are invaluable for identification of missing genes 408
encoding key enzymes, transporters, and regulatory proteins in C. roseus (Geu-Flores et al., 2012; 409
Van Moerkercke et al., 2015; Larsen et al., 2017; Paul et al. 2017; Payne et al., 2017; Caputi et al. 410
2018; Patra et al. 2018; Qu et al. 2019). Co-expression analysis of vindoline biosynthetic 411
pathway genes and GATA TFs identified two putative candidates for further characterization 412
(Supplemental Fig. S3). Similar to the vindoline pathway genes (Vazquez-Flota et al., 1997; St-413
Pierre et al., 1998; Besseau et al., 2013), CrGATA1 is preferentially expressed in leaves (Fig. 2A) 414
and significantly induced by light (Fig. 2B). Transient overexpression and VIGS of CrGATA1 415
significantly altered the expression of most of the vindoline pathway genes and vindoline 416
accumulation in C. roseus (Fig. 3). Expression of T3O and T3R were not increased in CrGATA1 417
overexpression while expression of T16H2 and D4H did not significantly change in VIGS lines. 418
These observations suggest that other regulators are also involved in the gene regulation. Similar 419
observations have been made for other regulators in the TIA pathway. For instance, a previous 420
study has shown that Catharanthus MYC2 (CrMYC2) regulates the AP2/ERF, ORCA3, by 421
binding to the T/G-box motif in the promoter. However, CrMYC2 overexpression does not 422
significantly affect ORCA3 transcripts, whereas silencing CrMYC2 in Catharanthus cells reduces 423
ORCA3 expression (Zhang et al., 2011). Similarly, ORCA3 is known to regulate the expression 424
of TDC. However, overexpression of ORCA3 in C. roseus hairy roots does not significantly 425
induce TDC expression (Peebles et al., 2009). Expression of TDC and STR were not affected by 426
overexpression or VIGS of CrGATA1, indicating that CrGATA1 does not regulate the upstream 427
TIA pathway genes in C. roseus seedlings. 428
Transactivation assay in N. benthamiana leaves showed that CrGATA1 activates the promoters 429
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
of key vindoline pathway genes (Fig. 4), suggesting that CrGATA1 is an activator in vindoline 430
biosynthesis. GATA TFs are involved in a number of developmental and physiological processes. 431
However, little is known about the roles of GATA TFs in light regulation of specialized 432
metabolism. Two well-characterized Arabidopsis GATA TFs, GNC and GNL, are light-inducible 433
and involved in chloroplast biogenesis and nitrogen metabolism (Richter et al., 2010; Hudson et 434
al., 2011). GNC and GNL bind the GATA motif in the GLU1 promoter (Hudson et al., 2011), 435
whereas the tobacco GATA TF, AGP1 activates NtMYC2 by binding to the GATC motif in the 436
NtMYC2 promoter (Sugimoto et al., 2003). Moreover, genome-wide binding analysis of GNC 437
and GNL reveals that both GATA and GATC cis-elements are enriched in the targets (Xu et al., 438
2017). We identified multiple GATA and GATC cis-elements in the promoters of DAT, D4H, T3R, 439
T3O, and T16H2. Mutation to the GATC element, but not the GATA element (Fig. 4B), in the 440
D4H promoter had a significant effect on the transactivation (Fig. 4C), suggesting that CrGATA1 441
likely recognizes the GATC element in activation of D4H. 442
443
Activities of D4H and DAT increase significantly upon exposure of C. roseus seedlings to red 444
light, and the effect is reversed by far-red light (Aerts and De Luca, 1992; Vazquez-Flota and De 445
Luca, 1998). In addition, transcript levels of D4H increase following exposure to red light 446
(Vazquez-Flota and De Luca, 1998). Phytochromes serve as receptors of red and far-red light in 447
plants and exist in two different forms, the inactive Pr and active Pfr. In the absence of red light, 448
the inactive Pr accumulates in cytosol; however, upon perception of red light, Pr converts to the 449
active Pfr that is subsequently translocated to the nucleus (Franklin and Quail, 2010). Here we 450
demonstrated that expression of CrGATA1, T16H2, T3O, T3R, and DAT in C. roseus seedling 451
increase upon exposure to red light and decrease following exposure to far-red light (Fig. 5), 452
suggesting a phytochrome-dependent regulation of vindoline biosynthesis. We did not observe an 453
apparent increase in D4H expression upon exposure to red light. This is most likely due to the 454
duration of treatment that affects its expression in seedlings. PIFs are known to interact with 455
phytochromes and regulate light-responsive gene expression in plants. PIFs regulate biosynthesis 456
of specialized metabolites, including anthocyanins (Shin et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2015) and SGAs 457
(Wang et al., 2018). For anthocyanins biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, PIF3 and HY5 act as 458
activators (Shin et al., 2007), whereas PIF4 and PIF5 function as repressors as overexpression of 459
PIF4 or PIF5 reduces anthocyanin accumulation (Liu et al., 2015). We identified three putative 460
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
PIFs in C. roseus genome. Transient overexpression or VIGS of CrPIF1 altered vindoline 461
pathway gene expression and vindoline accumulation in C. roseus seedlings (Fig. 6A-D). 462
Previous studies demonstrate that PIFs bind to the G/E-box/PBE elements in the target promoters. 463
Scanning of the promoters of CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes revealed the presence of 464
putative PIF binding sites (Fig. 6G and H). Transient transactivation assays showed that CrPIF1 465
repressed the promoter activities of CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes (Fig. 6G and H). 466
Site-directed mutagenesis of the PIF binding sites in the CrGATA1 and DAT promoters abolished 467
PIF-mediated repression, suggesting that CrPIF1 directly regulates CrGATA1 and DAT by 468
binding to the G/E-box/PBE elements in the promoters. The T16H2 promoter does not contain 469
canonical PBE (CACATG) motifs, but contains three E-box motifs (CAAATG, CAATTG and 470
CAGCTG) that are highly similar to the PBE. CrPIF1 likely suppresses T16H2 expression by 471
binding to the E-box (Fig. 6A). As TIA accumulation in C. roseus is developmentally regulated, 472
the difference in the alkaloid contents observed in this study between overexpression (Fig. 3B, 473
6B) and VIGS (Fig. 3D, 6D) lines of CrGATA1 or CrPIF1 is likely due to the age of the 474
seedlings used in the experiments. 475
476
In conclusion, our work elucidates a mechanism by which light influences vindoline biosynthesis 477
through the newly characterized CrGATA1 and CrPIF1. CrPIF1 represses the expression of 478
CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes in the dark, resulting in reduced vindoline accumulation. 479
CrPIF1 is possibly degraded in light by the 26S/UPS, leading to de-repression of CrGATA1. The 480
activation of CrGATA1 leads to upregulation of the vindoline pathway genes and increased 481
vindoline accumulation in C. roseus seedlings (Fig. 7). Other regulators are likely also involved 482
in vindoline biosynthesis. It remains unclear what transactivator regulates CrGATA1, which, 483
despite repression by CrPIF1, expresses at low (basal) level in the dark. Consequently, trace 484
amounts of vindoline can be detected in dark-grown C. roseus seedlings. Nevertheless, our 485
findings revealed a previously uncharacterized molecular mechanism that controls light-486
mediated TIA biosynthesis in C. roseus. The roles of PIF-mediated GATA TF regulation is 487
perhaps generally conserved in plant light-regulated biosynthesis of specialized metabolites. 488
489
MATERIALS and METHODS 490
491
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
Plant materials, growth condition and treatments 492
Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don var. ‘Little Bright Eye’ seeds obtained from NESeed 493
(neseed.com) were surface-sterilized using 30% (v/v) commercial bleach for 6 minutes, rinsed 494
five times with sterile water and incubated in dark at 28°C for germination on half-strength MS 495
medium. Seven-day-old etiolated seedlings were treated with white light (40 μmol m-2
s-1
), red 496
light (31 μmol m-2
s-1
) or far-red light (52 μmol m-2
s-1
). For white light treatment, seedlings were 497
incubated for 1, 4, 10, 24, 48 or 96 hours. For red and red/far-red light treatments, the seedlings 498
were exposed to red light for 2 and 4 hr, and then exposed to far-red light for two hours. Aerial 499
parts of seedlings were collected for RNA isolation or alkaloid extraction. 500
501
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative RT-PCR 502
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) were 503
performed as previously described (Paul et al., 2017). Primers used in RT-qPCR are listed in 504
Table S2. 505
506
In Silico analysis of putative regulators of vindoline in C. roseus 507
To identify C. roseus GATA TFs, sequences of all protein-coding genes were downloaded from 508
the latest version of the C. roseus genome from Dryad Digital Repository (Kellner et al., 2015). 509
BLAST search was preformed to identify the putative GATA and PIF TFs. To further validate 510
the BLAST search results, phylogenetic trees were constructed and visualized using Neighbor-511
Joining (N-J) method through MEGA5.1 software (Tamura et al., 2011). The statistical reliability 512
of individual nodes of the newly constructed trees was assessed by bootstrap analyses with 1,000 513
replications (Altschul et al., 1997). Alignments of amino acids were conducted by MAFFT 514
method (Katoh and Standley, 2013). 515
To analyze the expression patterns of C. roseus GATAs and vindoline pathway genes in five 516
different tissues (seedling, mature leaf, immature leaf, stem and root) (Góngora-Castillo et al., 517
2012), hierarchical clustering was performed as previously described (Paul et al., 2017). 518
519
520
Sub-cellular localization 521
To determine the sub-cellular localization of CrGATA1 or CrPIF1, full-length cDNA was 522
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
translationally fused with N-terminus of enhanced GFP (eGFP) in a pBlueScript (pBS) plasmid 523
as described earlier (Suttipanta et al., 2011). Expression of eGFP was driven by the CaMV 35S 524
promoter and the rbcS terminator. Plasmids were electroporated into tobacco (N. tabacum) 525
protoplasts and visualized with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE200, Nikon Corp.) 526
after 20 h of incubation in dark at room temperature. A pBS plasmid expressing only eGFP 527
served as a negative control. 528
529
Plasmid construction and transient gene overexpression in C. roseus seedling 530
For transient overexpression in C. roseus seedlings, CrGATA1, CrPIF1, CrPIF3 or CrPIF4/5 531
were cloned into a modified pCAMBIA1300 vector containing CaMV35S promoter and rbcS 532
terminator. C. roseus seedlings were transiently transformed with the plasmids using the Fast 533
Agro-mediated Seedling Transformation (FAST) method with some modifications (Weaver et al. 534
2014). Briefly, Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 harboring the plasmid was grown on Luria-535
Bertani (LB) plates containing 100 µg ml−1
kanamycin, 50 µg ml−1
gentamicin and 30 µg ml−1
536
rifampicin. A single colony was transferred to 2 ml liquid LB medium containing same 537
antibiotics and incubated at 250 rpm and 28°C. Overnight grown Agrobacterium cells were sub-538
cultured in 20 ml liquid LB medium for 16 h at 250 rpm and 28°C. Agrobacterium cultures were 539
then centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 540
MES, 100 µM acetosyringone) at an OD600 of 1.0, followed by incubation at 28°C for at least 3 h. 541
Seven-day-old C. roseus seedlings were immersed in the Agrobacterium cultures for 1 h. After 542
infiltration, seedlings were washed with sterile distilled water for five times and laid on petri 543
dishes with autoclaved wet filter papers. After three days, aerial parts of seedlings were collected 544
for RNA extraction and alkaloid analyses. 545
546
Virus-induced gene silencing in C. roseus plants 547
For virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) (Liu et al., 2002), the plasmids pTRV2-CrChlH, 548
pTRV2-CrGATA1 and pTRV2-CrPIF1 were generated by cloning partial coding sequences of 549
CrChlH (400 bp) or CrGATA1 (358 bp) or CrPIF1 (183 bp) in the multiple cloning sites (MCS) 550
of pTRV2 vector. C. roseus seedlings with two pairs of true leaves were used to perform the 551
VIGS assay using pinch method as previously described (Liscombe and O’Connor, 2011). 552
Harvest time was guided by the appearance of photobleaching of the corresponding leaves in 553
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
which CrChlH was silenced. As a control, plants were infected with an empty pTRV2 vector 554
(EV). The newly emerging pair of leaves following inoculation were harvested, frozen in liquid 555
nitrogen, and then stored in -80 °C until RNA and alkaloid extraction. 556
557
Plasmid construction and Nicotiana benthamiana leaf infiltration assays 558
The reporter plasmids for N. benthamiana leaf infiltration assays were generated by replacing the 559
CaMV 35S promoter in a modified pKYLX71 vector containing the GUS reporter and rbcS 560
terminator (Schardl et al., 1987) with T16H2 (1129 bp), T3O (703 bp), T3R (1129 bp), D4H (704 561
bp), DAT (1317 bp) or CrGATA1 (1189 bp) promoter. Mutants of the following cis-elements, 562
GATA-motifs (-430 to -427, and -138 to -135) and GATC-motifs in D4H promoter (-617 to -614, 563
and -541 to -538), G-box in CrGATA1 promoter (-142 to -137) and PBE-box in DAT promoter (-564
1106 to -1101) were generated by site-directed mutagenesis (Pattanaik et al., 2010). 565
pCAMBIA1300 vectors containing CrGATA1 or CrPIF1 were used as the effector plasmids. A 566
firefly luciferase (LUC) reporter, driven by CaMV 35S promoter and rbcS terminator, was used 567
as an internal control in the leaf infiltration assays. Infiltration solutions were prepared as 568
described in FAST method. Before infiltration, effector, reporter and internal control solutions 569
were combined at 1:1:1 ratios and mixed well. Infiltration of N. benthamiana leaves was 570
performed as previously described (Kumar and Bhatia, 2016). Two days after infiltration, leaf 571
discs were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to powder for protein extraction. LUC 572
and GUS activities were measured as previously described (Pattanaik et al., 2010). 573
574
Alkaloid extraction and analysis 575
To extract alkaloids, light-treated seedlings, Agro-infiltrated seedlings or leaves collected for 576
VIGS assay were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to powder. Samples were extracted twice 577
in methanol (1:100 w/v) for 24 h on a shaker. Pooled extracts were dried using a rotary 578
evaporator and diluted in methanol. Samples were analyzed with high-performance liquid 579
chromatography (HPLC), followed by electrospray-injection in tandem mass spectrometry, as 580
described previously (Suttipanta et al., 2011). The concentrations of the alkaloids were 581
calculated using standard curve. 582
583
ACCESSION NUMBERS 584
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
CrGATA1 (MK801106), CrPIF1 (ALI87040.1), CrPIF3 (ALI87041.1) and CrPIF4/5 585
(ALI87042.1) 586
587
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 588
Supplemental Figure S1. Simplified TIA biosynthetic pathway in C. roseus. 589
Supplemental Figure S2. Gene expression analysis and measurement of TIAs in C. roseus 590
seedlings. 591
Supplemental Figure S3. Co-expression of CrGATA genes with five light-inducible vindoline 592
pathway genes in different tissues of C. roseus. 593
Supplemental Figure S4. Phylogenetic analysis of AtGATAs and CrGATAs. 594
Supplemental Figure S5. Multiple sequence alignment of CrGATA1, and Arabidopsis GNC and 595
GNL. 596
Supplemental Figure S6. TDC and STR expression are not altered in CrGATA1 overexpression 597
and VIGS lines. 598
Supplemental Figure S7. Amino acid sequence alignment of PIFs from C. roseus, Arabidopsis, 599
and tomato. 600
Supplemental Figure S8. Phylogenetic analysis of PIFs from C. roseus, Arabidopsis and tomato. 601
Supplemental Figure S9. Expression of CrPIFs in response to light and dark. 602
Supplemental Figure S10. CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes are not altered by CrPIF3 and 603
CrPIF4/5 overexpression in C. roseus seedlings. 604
Supplemental Table S1. Light responsive cis-elements within promoters of five light-induced 605
vindoline. 606
Supplemental Tables S2. Primers used in this study. 607
608
609
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 610
We thank Dr. Bruce Downie of Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky for 611
assistance and advice on red/far-red light treatment of C. roseus seedlings, Mr. J. May and Ms. M. 612
Combs (Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Research Training Laboratories, 613
University of Kentucky) for assistance on LC-MS/MS. This work is supported partially by the 614
Harold R. Burton Endowed Professorship to L.Y. and by the National Science Foundation under 615
Cooperative Agreement no. 1355438 to L.Y. 616
617
Figure legends 618
Figure 1. Light-induced expression of vindoline pathway genes and vindoline production in 619
C. roseus seedlings. (A) Relative expression levels of seven vindoline pathway genes in aerial 620
parts of C. roseus seedlings. Seven-day-old, dark-grown, etiolated seedlings were exposed to 621
white light for different lengths of time (1 h, 4 h, 10 h, 24 h, 48 h, 96 h). Transcript levels of 622
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
T16H2, 16OMT, T3O, T3R, NMT, D4H and DAT were measured by RT-qPCR. The RPS9 gene 623
was used as an internal reference gene. (B) Accumulation of tabersonine and vindoline in aerial 624
parts of C. roseus seedlings. Here, “0 hour” refers to seven-day-old etiolated seedlings, which 625
were growing in dark (control) and then exposed to white light for 24 h and 96 h. Alkaloids were 626
extracted and analyzed by LC-MS/MS, and the concentrations of the alkaloids were estimated 627
based on peak areas compared to standards. Values represent means ± standard deviation from 628
three biological replicates. For each replicate, 8-10 seedlings were combined. Statistical 629
significance was determined by the Student’s t test (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01). 630
631
Figure 2. Identification of CrGATA1. (A) Expression of CRO_134526 (CrGATA1), 632
CRO_117711 and five light inducible vindoline pathway genes in aerial parts and roots of seven-633
day-old light-grown C. roseus seedlings. (B) Expression of CRO_134526 (CrGATA1) is quickly 634
induced while (C) CRO_117711 is repressed by light in areal parts of C. roseus seedlings. For 635
light treatment, seven-day-old etiolated seedlings were exposed to white light for different 636
lengths if time. Transcript levels of vindoline pathway genes, CrGATA1 and CRO_117711 were 637
measured by RT-qPCR with RPS9 as internal reference gene. (D) D4H, DAT and CrGATA1 638
promoters are light inducible in N. benthamiana leaf. CaMV35S promoter is used as negative 639
control. D4H, DAT and CrGATA1 promoters were cloned in pKYLX71 vector, respectively, to 640
drive the expression of GUS gene. The promoter-GUS plasmids were infiltrated in N. 641
benthamiana leaves. Plants were kept in dark or light for three days. GUS activities were 642
normalized by luciferase activities. Values represent means ± SD from three biological replicates. 643
Statistical significance was determined by the Student’s t test (** P < 0.01). (E) eGFP is 644
accumulated throughout the cell (left) whereas eGFP-CrGATA1 is localized to the nucleus 645
(right). The experiment was repeated two times and a representative result is shown here. 646
647
Figure 3. CrGATA1 positively regulates vindoline biosynthesis in C. roseus. Transient 648
overexpression of CrGATA1 in C. roseus seedlings elevates expression of vindoline pathway 649
genes (A) and vindoline production (B). (A) Relative expression of CrGATA1 and five light-650
inducible vindoline pathway genes in empty vector (EV) controls and CrGATA1 overexpression 651
(OX) seedlings measured by RT-qPCR. (B) Measurement of tabersonine and vindoline in EV 652
controls and CrGATA1 OX lines. (C) Expression of vindoline pathway genes in CrGATA1 VIGS 653
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
leaves. Relative expression of CrGATA1 and five light-inducible vindoline pathway genes in 654
empty vector (EV) controls and CrGATA1 VIGS leaves were measured by RT-qPCR. (D) 655
Measurement of tabersonine and vindoline in EV controls and CrGATA1 VIGS lines. Alkaloids 656
were extracted and analyzed by LC-MS/MS, and the concentrations of the alkaloids were 657
estimated based on peak areas compared to standards. For RT-qPCR, The RPS9 gene was used 658
as an internal reference gene. In all cases, values represent means ± SD from three biological 659
replicates. Statistical significance was calculated using the Student’s t-test (* P < 0.05; ** P < 660
0.01). 661
662
Figure 4. CrGATA1 transactivates promoters of five light-inducible vindoline pathway 663
genes through GATC-motifs. (A) Transactivation of T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H and DAT 664
promoters (-pro), fused to the GUS reporter, by CrGATA1. Effector (CrGATA1) and reporter 665
(promoter-GUS) constructs were co-infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves. A plasmid containing 666
luciferase reporter, driven by CaMV35S promoter and rbcS terminator, was used as a 667
normalization control. Luciferase and GUS activities were measured two days after infiltration. 668
GUS activity was normalized against luciferase activity. Control represents the reporter with 669
empty vector (EV). (B) Schematic diagram showing the GATA-motifs in the D4H promoter. 670
Point mutations in the GATA-motifs are indicated by red letters. Mutation in the GATA-motif 671
has no effects on the activation of the D4H promoter by CrGATA1. (C) Schematic diagram 672
showing the GATC-motifs in the D4H promoter. Mutations in the GATC-motifs are indicated by 673
red letters. Mutation in the GATC-motif affects the activation of the D4H promoter by 674
CrGATA1. Data presented here are the means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical 675
significance was calculated using the Student’s t-test (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01). 676
Figure 5. Expression of CrGATA1 and five light-inducible vindoline pathway genes in C. 677
roseus seedlings exposed to red and far-red light. Seven-day-old etiolated C. roseus seedlings 678
were treated with red light for 4 h (measured at 2 h and 4 h), followed by far-red light for 2 h. 679
Gene expression in aerial parts of the seedlings was measured by RT-qPCR. The CrChlH, 680
CrPORC and CrRCA were used as positive controls. The RPS9 gene was used as an internal 681
reference gene. Data represent means ± standard deviation of three biological samples. Different 682
letters denote statistical differences as assessed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (P < 0.05). 683
684
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
Figure 6. CrPIF1 negatively regulates CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes through G-685
box or PBE box. (A) Relative expression of CrGATA1 and five light-inducible vindoline 686
pathway genes in empty vector (EV) controls and CrPIF1 overexpression (OX) seedlings were 687
measured by RT-qPCR. Seven-day-old seedlings were infiltrated and kept in dark for three days 688
before sample collection. (B) Measurement of tabersonine and vindoline in EV controls and 689
CrPIF1 OX lines. (C) Expression of CrGATA1 and vindoline pathway genes in CrPIF1 VIGS 690
leaves. Relative expression of CrPIF1, CrGATA1 and five vindoline pathway genes in EV and 691
CrGATA1 VIGS leaves were measured by RT-qPCR. (D) Measurement of tabersonine and 692
vindoline in EV controls and CrPIF1 VIGS lines. For RT-qPCR, the RPS9 gene was used as an 693
internal reference gene. For tabersonine and vindoline contents, alkaloids were extracted and 694
analyzed by LC-MS/MS, and the concentrations of the alkaloids were estimated based on peak 695
areas compared to standards. (E) Sub-cellular localization of CrPIF1 in tobacco (N. tabacum) 696
protoplasts. eGFP is accumulated throughout the cell (left) whereas eGFP-CrPIF1 is localized to 697
the nucleus (right). (F) Transactivation of CrGATA1, T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H and DAT 698
promoters (-pro), fused to the GUS reporter, by CrPIF1. Transactivation assays were carried out 699
by co-infiltration of the CrGATA1-expression vector with a pro-GUS construct into N. 700
benthamiana leaves. The plants were incubated in dark after infiltration. A plasmid containing 701
luciferase reporter, driven by CaMV 35S promoter and rbcS terminator, was used as a 702
normalization control. Luciferase and GUS activities were measured two days after infiltration. 703
GUS activity was normalized against luciferase activity. Control represents the reporter with EV. 704
(G) Mutation in the G-box sequence (top panel) affects the transactivation of the CrGATA1 705
promoter by CrPIF1. (H) Mutation in the PBE-box sequence (top panel) affects the 706
transactivation of the DAT promoter by CrPIF1. All data presented here are the means ± SD of 707
three biological replicates. Statistical significance was calculated using the Student’s t-test (* P < 708
0.05). 709
710
Figure 7. Models depicting the regulatory roles of CrPIF1-CrGATA1 module in light-711
induced of vindoline biosynthesis. Left panel: CrPIF1 is likely accumulated in the dark and 712
represses the expression of CrGATA1, T16H2 and DAT by binding to their promoters. 713
Repression of CrGATA1 results in downregulation of vindoline pathway genes, T16H2, T3O, 714
T3R, D4H and DAT, leading to limited vindoline production and increased tabersonine 715
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
accumulation. One or more unknown TF (TF?) mediates the low (basal) expression of CrGATA1 716
despite CrPIF1 repression. Right panel: CrPIF1 is possibly degraded upon exposure of C. roseus 717
seedlings to light, which is mediated by the red light sensed by phytochrome. De-repression of 718
CrGATA1 results in the activation of vindoline pathway genes and vindoline accumulation. The 719
seven genes involved in conversion of tabersonine to vindoline are listed in the inserted box. 720
Genes in red are responsive to light induction. 721
722
REFERENCES 723
724
Aerts RJ, De Luca V (1992) Phytochrome is involved in the light-regulation of vindoline biosynthesis in 725 Catharanthus. Plant Physiol 100: 1029-1032 726
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and 727 PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402 728
Bastakis E, Hedtke B, Klermund C, Grimm B, Schwechheimer C (2018) LLM-domain B-GATA transcription 729 factors play multifaceted roles in controlling greening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 30: 582-599 730
Behringer C, Schwechheimer C (2015) B-GATA transcription factors–insights into their structure, regulation, and 731 role in plant development. Front Plant Sci 6: 90 732
Besseau S, Kellner F, Lanoue A, Thamm AM, Salim V, Schneider B, Geu-Flores F, Höfer R, Guirimand G, 733 Guihur A, Oudin A, Glevarec G, Foureau E, Papon N, Clastre M, Giglioli-Guivarc'h N, St-Pierre 734 B, Werck-Reichhart D, Burlat V, De Luca V, O'Connor SE, Courdavault V (2013) A pair of 735 tabersonine 16-hydroxylases initiates the synthesis of vindoline in an organ-dependent manner in 736 Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol 163: 1792-1803 737
Caputi L, Franke J, Farrow SC, Chung K, Payne RM, Nguyen T-D, Dang T-TT, Carqueijeiro IST, 738 Koudounas K, de Bernonville TD, Ameyaw B, Jones DM, Vieira IJC, Courdavault V, O'Connor SE 739 (2018) Missing enzymes in the biosynthesis of the anticancer drug vinblastine in Madagascar periwinkle. 740 Science 360: 1235-1239 741
Cárdenas PD, Sonawane PD, Pollier J, Bossche RV, Dewangan V, Weithorn E, Tal L, Meir S, Rogachev I, 742 Malitsky S, Giri AP, Goossens A, Burdman S, Aharoni A (2016) GAME9 regulates the biosynthesis of 743 steroidal alkaloids and upstream isoprenoids in the plant mevalonate pathway. Nat Commun 7: 10654 744
Courdavault V, Papon N, Clastre M, Giglioli-Guivarc’h N, St-Pierre B, Burlat V (2014) A look inside an 745 alkaloid multisite plant: the Catharanthus logistics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 19: 43-50 746
De Carolis E, Chan F, Balsevich J, De Luca V (1990) Isolation and characterization of a 2-oxoglutarate dependent 747 dioxygenase involved in the second-to-last step in vindoline biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 94: 1323-1329 748
De Luca V, Balsevich J, Tyler R, Eilert U, Panchuk B, Kurz W (1986) Biosynthesis of indole alkaloids: 749 developmental regulation of the biosynthetic pathway from tabersonine to vindoline in Catharanthus roseus. 750 J Plant Physiol 125: 147-156 751
Franklin KA, Quail PH (2010) Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development. J Exp Bot 61: 11-24 752 Geu-Flores F, Sherden NH, Courdavault V, Burlat V, Glenn WS, Wu C, Nims E, Cui Y, O’connor SE (2012) 753
An alternative route to cyclic terpenes by reductive cyclization in iridoid biosynthesis. Nature 492: 138-142 754 Góngora-Castillo E, Childs KL, Fedewa G, Hamilton JP, Liscombe DK, Magallanes-Lundback M, Mandadi 755
KK, Nims E, Runguphan W, Vaillancourt B, Varbanova-Herde M, DellaPenna D, McKnight TD, 756 O’Connor S and Buell CR (2012) Development of transcriptomic resources for interrogating the 757 biosynthesis of monoterpene indole alkaloids in medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 7: e52506 758
Hudson D, Guevara DR, Hand AJ, Xu Z, Hao L, Chen X, Zhu T, Bi Y-M, Rothstein SJ (2013) Rice cytokinin 759 GATA transcription Factor1 regulates chloroplast development and plant architecture. Plant Physiol 162: 760 132-144 761
Hudson D, Guevara D, Yaish MW, Hannam C, Long N, Clarke JD, Bi Y-M, Rothstein SJ (2011) GNC and 762 CGA1 modulate chlorophyll biosynthesis and glutamate synthase (GLU1/Fd-GOGAT) expression in 763 Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 6: e26765 764
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
Inagaki N, Kinoshita K, Kagawa T, Tanaka A, Ueno O, Shimada H, Takano M (2015) Phytochrome B 765 mediates the regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis through transcriptional regulation of ChlH and GUN4 766 in rice seedlings. PLoS ONE 10: e0135408 767
Jiao Y, Lau OS, Deng XW (2007) Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat Rev Genet 8: 217-768 230 769
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in 770 performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30: 772-780 771
Kellner F, Kim J, Clavijo BJ, Hamilton JP, Childs KL, Vaillancourt B, Cepela J, Habermann M, Steuernagel 772 B, Clissold L, McLay K, Buell CR, O'Connor SE (2015) Genome-guided investigation of plant natural 773 product biosynthesis. Plant J 82: 680-692 774
Klermund C, Ranftl QL, Diener J, Bastakis E, Richter R, Schwechheimer C (2016) LLM-domain B-GATA 775 transcription factors promote stomatal development downstream of light signaling pathways in Arabidopsis 776 thaliana hypocotyls. Plant Cell 28: 646-660 777
Kumar S, Bhatia S (2016) A polymorphic (GA/CT) n-SSR influences promoter activity of tryptophan 778 decarboxylase gene in Catharanthus roseus L. Don. Sci Rep 6: 33280 779
Larsen B, Fuller VL, Pollier J, Van Moerkercke A, Schweizer F, Payne R, Colinas M, O’connor SE, Goossens 780 A, Halkier BA (2017) Identification of iridoid glucoside transporters in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Cell 781 Physiol 58: 1507-1518 782
Leivar P, Monte E (2014) PIFs: systems integrators in plant development. Plant Cell 26: 56-78 783 Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouzé P, Rombauts S (2002) PlantCARE, 784
a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter 785 sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 325-327 786
Levac D, Murata J, Kim WS, De Luca V (2008) Application of carborundum abrasion for investigating the leaf 787 epidermis: molecular cloning of Catharanthus roseus 16-hydroxytabersonine-16-O-methyltransferase. Plant 788 J 53: 225-236 789
Li CY, Leopold AL, Sander GW, Shanks JV, Zhao L, Gibson SI (2015) CrBPF1 overexpression alters transcript 790 levels of terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthetic and regulatory genes. Front Plant Sci 6: 818 791
Li CY, Leopold AL, Sander GW, Shanks JV, Zhao L, Gibson SI (2013) The ORCA2 transcription factor plays a 792 key role in regulation of the terpenoid indole alkaloid pathway. BMC Plant Biol 13: 155 793
Liscombe DK, O’Connor SE (2011) A virus-induced gene silencing approach to understanding alkaloid 794 metabolism in Catharanthus roseus. Phytochemistry 72: 1969-1977 795
Liscombe DK, Usera AR, O’Connor SE (2010) Homolog of tocopherol C methyltransferases catalyzes N 796 methylation in anticancer alkaloid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 18793-18798 797
Liu J, Gao F, Ren J, Lu X, Ren G, Wang R (2017) A novel AP2/ERF transcription factor CR1 regulates the 798 accumulation of vindoline and serpentine in Catharanthus roseus. Front Plant Sci 8: 2082 799
Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar S (2002) Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J 31: 777-786 800 Liu Y, Tikunov Y, Schouten RE, Marcelis LF, Visser RG, Bovy A (2018) Anthocyanin biosynthesis and 801
degradation mechanisms in Solanaceous vegetables: a review. Front Chem 6: 52 802 Liu Z, Taub CC, McClung CR (1996) Identification of an Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate 803
carboxylase/oxygenase activase (RCA) minimal promoter regulated by light and the circadian clock. Plant 804 Physiol 112: 43-51 805
Liu Z, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li P, Zhao C, Chen Y, Bi Y (2015) Phytochrome-interacting factors PIF4 and PIF5 806 negatively regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis under red light in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Sci 238: 64-72 807
Lowry JA, Atchley WR (2000) Molecular evolution of the GATA family of transcription factors: conservation 808 within the DNA-binding domain. J Mol Evol 50: 103-115 809
Manfield IW, Devlin PF, Jen C-H, Westhead DR, Gilmartin PM (2007) Conservation, convergence, and 810 divergence of light-responsive, circadian-regulated, and tissue-specific expression patterns during evolution 811 of the Arabidopsis GATA gene family. Plant Physiol 143: 941-958 812
Menke FL, Champion A, Kijne JW, Memelink J (1999) A novel jasmonate and elicitor-responsive element in the 813 periwinkle secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene Str interacts with a jasmonate and elicitor inducible AP2 814 domain transcription factor, ORCA2. EMBO J 18: 4455-4463 815
Moon J, Zhu L, Shen H, Huq E (2008) PIF1 directly and indirectly regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis to optimize 816 the greening process in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9433-9438 817
Newton A, Mackay J, Crossley M (2001) The N-terminal zinc finger of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 818 binds GATC motifs in DNA. J Biol Chem 276: 35794-35801 819
Niehaus EM, Schumacher J, Burkhardt I, Rabe P, Münsterkötter M, Güldener U, Sieber CM, Dickschat JS, 820
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
Tudzynski B (2017) The GATA-type transcription factor Csm1 regulates conidiation and secondary 821 metabolism in Fusarium fujikuroi. Front Microbiol 8: 1175 822
Paik I, Kathare PK, Kim JI, Huq E (2017) Expanding roles of PIFs in signal integration from multiple processes. 823 Mol Plant 10: 1035-1046 824
Pan Q, Mustafa NR, Tang K, Choi YH, Verpoorte R (2016) Monoterpenoid indole alkaloids biosynthesis and its 825 regulation in Catharanthus roseus: a literature review from genes to metabolites. Phytochem Rev 15: 221-826 250 827
Pan Q, Wang Q, Yuan F, Xing S, Zhao J, Choi YH, Verpoorte R, Tian Y, Wang G, Tang K (2012) 828 Overexpression of ORCA3 and G10H in Catharanthus roseus plants regulated alkaloid biosynthesis and 829 metabolism revealed by NMR-metabolomics. PLoS ONE 7: e43038 830
Patra B, Pattanaik S, Schluttenhofer C, Yuan L (2018) A network of jasmonate‐responsive bHLH factors 831 modulate monoterpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol 217: 1566-1581 832
Pattanaik S, Werkman JR, Kong Q, Yuan L (2010) Site-directed mutagenesis and saturation mutagenesis for the 833 functional study of transcription factors involved in plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Methods Mol 834 Biol 643: 47-57 835
Paul P, Singh SK, Patra B, Sui X, Pattanaik S, Yuan L (2017) A differentially regulated AP2/ERF transcription 836 factor gene cluster acts downstream of a map kinase cascade to modulate terpenoid indole alkaloid 837 biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol 213: 1107-1123 838
Pauw B, Hilliou FA, Martin VS, Chatel G, de Wolf CJ, Champion A, Pré M, van Duijn B, Kijne JW, van der 839 Fits L, Memelink J (2004) Zinc finger proteins act as transcriptional repressors of alkaloid biosynthesis 840 genes in Catharanthus roseus. J Biol Chem 279: 52940-52948 841
Payne RM, Xu D, Foureau E, Carqueijeiro MIST, Oudin A, de Bernonville TD, Novak V, Burow M, Olsen C-842 E, Jones DM, Tatsis EC, Pendle A, Ann Halkier B, Geu-Flores F, Courdavault V, Nour-Eldin 843 HH, O'Connor SE (2017) An NPF transporter exports a central monoterpene indole alkaloid intermediate 844 from the vacuole. Nat Plants 3: 16208 845
Peebles CA, Hughes EH, Shanks JV, San KY (2009) Transcriptional response of the terpenoid indole 846
alkaloid pathway to the overexpression of ORCA3 along with jasmonic acid elicitation of 847
Catharanthus roseus hairy roots over time. Metab Eng 11: 76–86 848 Pham VN, Kathare PK, Huq E (2018) Phytochromes and phytochrome interacting factors. Plant Physiol 176: 849
1025-1038 850 Polturak G, Aharoni A (2018) "La Vie en Rose": Biosynthesis, sources, and applications of betalain pigments. Mol 851
Plant 11: 7-22 852 Qu Y, Easson ML, Froese J, Simionescu R, Hudlicky T, De Luca V (2015) Completion of the seven-step 853
pathway from tabersonine to the anticancer drug precursor vindoline and its assembly in yeast. Proc Natl 854 Acad Sci USA 112: 6224-6229 855
Qu Y, Safonova O, De Luca V (2019) Completion of the canonical pathway for assembly of anticancer drugs 856 vincristine/vinblastine in Catharanthus roseus. Plant J 97:257-266. 857
Ranftl QL, Bastakis E, Klermund C, Schwechheimer C (2016) LLM-domain containing B-GATA factors control 858 different aspects of cytokinin-regulated development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 170: 2295-2311 859
Reyes JC, Muro-Pastor MI, Florencio FJ (2004) The GATA family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis and 860 rice. Plant Physiol 134: 1718-1732 861
Richter R, Bastakis E, Schwechheimer C (2013a) Cross-repressive interactions between SOC1 and the GATAs 862 GNC and GNL/CGA1 in the control of greening, cold tolerance, and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant 863 Physiol 162: 1992-2004 864
Richter R, Behringer C, Müller IK, Schwechheimer C (2010) The GATA-type transcription factors GNC and 865 GNL/CGA1 repress gibberellin signaling downstream from DELLA proteins and PHYTOCHROME-866 INTERACTING FACTORS. Genes Dev 24: 2093-2104 867
Richter R, Behringer C, Zourelidou M, Schwechheimer C (2013b) Convergence of auxin and gibberellin 868 signaling on the regulation of the GATA transcription factors GNC and GNL in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc 869 Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 13192-13197 870
Rosado D, Gramegna G, Cruz A, Lira BS, Freschi L, de Setta N, Rossi M (2016) Phytochrome Interacting 871 Factors (PIFs) in Solanum lycopersicum: Diversity, evolutionary history and expression profiling during 872 different developmental processes. PLoS ONE 11: e0165929 873
Schardl CL, Byrd AD, Benzion G, Altschuler MA, Hildebrand DF, Hunt AG (1987) Design and construction of 874 a versatile system for the expression of foreign genes in plants. Gene 61: 1-11 875
Schweizer F, Colinas M, Pollier J, Van Moerkercke A, Bossche RV, de Clercq R, Goossens A (2018) An 876
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
engineered combinatorial module of transcription factors boosts production of monoterpenoid indole 877 alkaloids in Catharanthus roseus. Metab Eng 48: 150-162 878
Shin J, Park E, Choi G (2007) PIF3 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in an HY5‐dependent manner with both 879 factors directly binding anthocyanin biosynthetic gene promoters in Arabidopsis. Plant J 49: 981-994 880
Sibéril Y, Benhamron S, Memelink J, Giglioli-Guivarc'h N, Thiersault M, Boisson B, Doireau P, Gantet P 881 (2001) Catharanthus roseus G-box binding factors 1 and 2 act as repressors of strictosidine synthase gene 882 expression in cell cultures. Plant Mol Biol 45: 477-488 883
St-Pierre B, De Luca V (1995) A cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase catalyzes the first step in the conversion of 884 tabersonine to vindoline in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol 109: 131-139 885
St-Pierre B, Laflamme P, Alarco AM, De Luca V (1998) The terminal O-acetyltransferase involved in vindoline 886 biosynthesis defines a new class of proteins responsible for coenzyme A-dependent acyl transfer. Plant J 14: 887 703-713 888
Sugimoto K, Takeda S, Hirochika H (2003) Transcriptional activation mediated by binding of a plant GATA-type 889 zinc finger protein AGP1 to the AG-motif (AGATCCAA) of the wound-inducible Myb gene NtMyb2. 890 Plant J 36: 550-564 891
Sui X, Kumar Singh S, Patra B, Schluttenhofer C, Guo W, Pattanaik S, Yuan L (2018) Cross-family 892 transcription factor interaction between MYC2 and GBFs modulates terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis. 893 J Exp Bot 69: 4267-4281 894
Suttipanta N, Pattanaik S, Kulshrestha M, Patra B, Singh SK, Yuan L (2011) The transcription factor 895 CrWRKY1 positively regulates the terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant 896 Physiol 157: 2081-2093 897
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary 898 genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. 899 Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739 900
Thamm AM, Qu Y, De Luca V (2016) Discovery and metabolic engineering of iridoid/secoiridoid and 901 monoterpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Phytochem Rev 15: 339-361 902
Toledo-Ortiz G, Johansson H, Lee KP, Bou-Torrent J, Stewart K, Steel G, Rodríguez-Concepción M, 903 Halliday KJ (2014) The HY5-PIF regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of 904 photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genet 10: e1004416 905
van der Fits L, Memelink J (2000) ORCA3, a jasmonate-responsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and 906 secondary metabolism. Science 289: 295-297 907
van der Fits L, Zhang H, Menke FL, Deneka M, Memelink J (2000) A Catharanthus roseus BPF-1 homologue 908 interacts with an elicitor-responsive region of the secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene Str and is induced 909 by elicitor via a JA-independent signal transduction pathway. Plant Mol Biol 44: 675-685 910
Van Moerkercke A, Steensma P, Gariboldi I, Espoz J, Purnama PC, Schweizer F, Miettinen K, Vanden 911 Bossche R, De Clercq R, Memelink J, Goossens A (2016) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor 912 BIS2 is essential for monoterpenoid indole alkaloid production in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. 913 Plant J 88: 3-12 914
Van Moerkercke A, Steensma P, Schweizer F, Pollier J, Gariboldi I, Payne R, Bossche RV, Miettinen K, 915 Espoz J, Purnama PC, Kellner F, Seppänen-Laakso T, O'Connor SE, Rischer H, Memelink 916 J, Goossens A (2015) The bHLH transcription factor BIS1 controls the iridoid branch of the 917 monoterpenoid indole alkaloid pathway in Catharanthus roseus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 8130-8135 918
Vazquez-Flota F, De Carolis E, Alarco AM, De Luca V (1997) Molecular cloning and characterization of 919 desacetoxyvindoline-4-hydroxylase, a 2-oxoglutarate dependent-dioxygenase involved in the biosynthesis 920 of vindoline in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Plant Mol Biol 34: 935-948 921
Vazquez-Flota FA, De Luca V (1998) Developmental and light regulation of desacetoxyvindoline 4-hydroxylase in 922 Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Evidence of a multilevel regulatory mechanism. Plant Physiol 117: 1351-923 1361 924
Vom Endt D, e Silva MS, Kijne JW, Pasquali G, Memelink J (2007) Identification of a bipartite jasmonate-925 responsive promoter element in the Catharanthus roseus ORCA3 transcription factor gene that interacts 926 specifically with AT-Hook DNA-binding proteins. Plant Physiol 144: 1680-1689 927
Wang C, Meng L, Gao Y, Grierson D, Fu D (2018) Manipulation of light signal transduction factors as a means of 928 modifying steroidal glycoalkaloids accumulation in tomato leaves. Front Plant Sci 9: 437 929
Weaver J, Goklany S, Rizvi N, Cram EJ, Lee-Parsons CW (2014) Optimizing the transient Fast Agro-mediated 930 Seedling Transformation (FAST) method in Catharanthus roseus seedlings. Plant Cell Rep 33: 89-97 931
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
Xu Z, Casaretto JA, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ (2017) Genome-wide binding analysis of AtGNC and AtCGA1 932 demonstrates their cross‐regulation and common and specific functions. Plant Direct 1: e00016 933
Yadav V, Mallappa C, Gangappa SN, Bhatia S, Chattopadhyay S (2005) A basic helix-loop-helix transcription 934 factor in Arabidopsis, MYC2, acts as a repressor of blue light–mediated photomorphogenic growth. Plant 935 Cell 17: 1953-1966 936
Zhang H, Hedhili S, Montiel G, Zhang Y, Chatel G, Pré M, Gantet P, Memelink J (2011) The basic helix-loop-937
helix transcription factor CrMYC2 controls the jasmonate-responsive expression of the ORCA genes that 938 regulate alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant J 67: 61-71 939
Zhang Y, Mayba O, Pfeiffer A, Shi H, Tepperman JM, Speed TP, Quail PH (2013) A quartet of PIF bHLH 940 factors provides a transcriptionally centered signaling hub that regulates seedling morphogenesis through 941 differential expression-patterning of shared target genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 9: e1003244 942
943
944
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6 T16H2 16OMT2 9 T3O
6T3R 2 NMT 3 D4H DAT
DarkLight
4
2
0
42
0
1
0
1
0
0
0 0
6
3
2
1
4321
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
A
B
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
LightDark
0
400
800
1200 Tabersonine Vindoline
0
300
600
900
ng m
g-1
DW
0 24 96 0 24 96
LightDark
8
Time (h) Time (h)
*
***
*
*
**
**
**** ** **
****
**
** ** **
**
** **
**
** ** ****
**
**
**
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
**
****
**
**
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
RootsAerial parts
05
10100
10000
20000
30000
40000
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
CRO_T134526 (CrGATA1)
**
**
**
**
1 4 10 24 48 96Time (h)
0
1
2 CRO_T117711
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
****
0
1
2
3
4
5
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity
eGFP eGFP-CrGATA1
A B
C D
E
DarkLight
DarkLight
**
****
DarkLight
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
* *
****
0
3
6
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
0
1
2
**
Tabersonine Vindoline
Tabersonine Vindoline
0
500
1000
1500
2000
ng m
g-1
DW
0204060
20005000
10000
ng m
g-1
DW
*
*
*
**
A B
C D
ControlCrGATA1-OX
ControlCrGATA1-OX
** **
ControlCrGATA1-VIGS
ControlCrGATA1-VIGS
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
0
1
2
3
4
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity*
****
***
A
C
EV + promoter-GUSCrGATA1 + promoter-GUS
GATC GATC
GAAA GATC
GATC GAAA
GAAA GAAA
- 617 - 614 - 541 - 538
WT
MUT1
MUT2
M1M2
D4H
-pro
WT MUT1 MUT2 M1M20
1
2
3
4R
elat
ive
GU
S ac
tivity
EV + D4H-pro-GUSCrGATA1 + D4H-pro-GUS
**
*- 1
ATG
ATG
ATG
ATG
B
GATA GATA
GGCA GATA
GATA GGCA
GGCA GGCA
- 430 - 427 - 138 - 135
WT
MUT1
MUT2
M1M2
D4H
-pro
- 1ATG
ATG
ATG
ATGWT MUT1 MUT2 M1M2
0
1
2
3
4
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity
EV + D4H-pro-GUSCrGATA1 + D4H-pro-GUS
* * * *
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrChlH
D4H DAT
CrGATA1
CrPORC CrRCA
T3O
T3R
T16H2
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
0
1
2
3
Rel
ativ
e ex
pres
sion
0
1
2
0
1
2
3
0
2
4
6
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
0
1
2
0 2 4 6
R FR0 2 4 6
R FR
0 2 4 6
R FR
cb
a
c
b ba
bc
bc
ab
ba a
c ba a
c dc
ab
cb
ab a a a
b
b ba
c
Time (h)
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
***
EV + promoter-GUSCrPIF1 + promoter-GUS
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity
F
G
CACGTG
- 142 - 137
WT
MUT CAAAAG
CrGATA1 promoter
CACATG
- 1106 - 1101
WT
MUT
DAT promoterH
CACAAA
EV + CrGATA1-pro-GUSCrPIF1 + CrGATA1-pro-GUS
EV + DAT-pro-GUSCrPIF1 + DAT-pro-GUS**
WT MUT WT MUT0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity
- 1
ATG
ATG
- 1
ATG
ATG
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Rel
ativ
e Ex
pres
sion
Tabersonine Vindoline0
400
800
1200
1600
ng m
g-1D
W
ControlCrPIF1-OX
ControlCrPIF1-OX
*
* * **
*
** **
0
0.5
1.0
Rel
ativ
e G
US
activ
ity 1.5
CrGATA1 T16H2 T3O T3R D4H DAT
A B
0
2
4
6
8
10
Rel
ativ
e Ex
pres
sion
ControlCrPIF1-VIGS
C D
E
**
****
**
**
**
ng m
g-1D
W
0
50
8000
16000
**
*
Tabersonine Vindoline
**
ControlCrPIF1-VIGS
eGFP eGFP-CrPIF1
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
CrGATA1
CrPIF1
CrPIF1
T3O, T3R, D4H
CrGATA1
CrGATA1
T16H2, DAT
CrPIF1
Red lightCrPIF1
CrPIF1
T16H2, DAT
T16H2, T3O, T3R, D4H, DAT
CrGATA1
Tabersonine Vindoline
Vindoline Tabersonine
TF?
CrGATA1
TF?
Basal activation of CrGATA1Strong activation of CrGATA1
Tabersonine
Vindoline
T16H216OMTT3OT3RNMTD4HDAT
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsAerts RJ, De Luca V (1992) Phytochrome is involved in the light-regulation of vindoline biosynthesis in Catharanthus. Plant Physiol 100:1029-1032
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generationof protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Bastakis E, Hedtke B, Klermund C, Grimm B, Schwechheimer C (2018) LLM-domain B-GATA transcription factors play multifacetedroles in controlling greening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 30: 582-599
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Behringer C, Schwechheimer C (2015) B-GATA transcription factors–insights into their structure, regulation, and role in plantdevelopment. Front Plant Sci 6: 90
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Besseau S, Kellner F, Lanoue A, Thamm AM, Salim V, Schneider B, Geu-Flores F, Höfer R, Guirimand G, Guihur A, Oudin A, GlevarecG, Foureau E, Papon N, Clastre M, Giglioli-Guivarc'h N, St-Pierre B, Werck-Reichhart D, Burlat V, De Luca V, O'Connor SE,Courdavault V (2013) A pair of tabersonine 16-hydroxylases initiates the synthesis of vindoline in an organ-dependent manner inCatharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol 163: 1792-1803
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Caputi L, Franke J, Farrow SC, Chung K, Payne RM, Nguyen T-D, Dang T-TT, Carqueijeiro IST, Koudounas K, de Bernonville TD,Ameyaw B, Jones DM, Vieira IJC, Courdavault V, O'Connor SE (2018) Missing enzymes in the biosynthesis of the anticancer drugvinblastine in Madagascar periwinkle. Science 360: 1235-1239
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Cárdenas PD, Sonawane PD, Pollier J, Bossche RV, Dewangan V, Weithorn E, Tal L, Meir S, Rogachev I, Malitsky S, Giri AP, GoossensA, Burdman S, Aharoni A (2016) GAME9 regulates the biosynthesis of steroidal alkaloids and upstream isoprenoids in the plantmevalonate pathway. Nat Commun 7: 10654
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Courdavault V, Papon N, Clastre M, Giglioli-Guivarc'h N, St-Pierre B, Burlat V (2014) A look inside an alkaloid multisite plant: theCatharanthus logistics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 19: 43-50
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
De Carolis E, Chan F, Balsevich J, De Luca V (1990) Isolation and characterization of a 2-oxoglutarate dependent dioxygenaseinvolved in the second-to-last step in vindoline biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 94: 1323-1329
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
De Luca V, Balsevich J, Tyler R, Eilert U, Panchuk B, Kurz W (1986) Biosynthesis of indole alkaloids: developmental regulation of thebiosynthetic pathway from tabersonine to vindoline in Catharanthus roseus. J Plant Physiol 125: 147-156
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Franklin KA, Quail PH (2010) Phytochrome functions in Arabidopsis development. J Exp Bot 61: 11-24Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Geu-Flores F, Sherden NH, Courdavault V, Burlat V, Glenn WS, Wu C, Nims E, Cui Y, O'connor SE (2012) An alternative route to cyclicterpenes by reductive cyclization in iridoid biosynthesis. Nature 492: 138-142
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Góngora-Castillo E, Childs KL, Fedewa G, Hamilton JP, Liscombe DK, Magallanes-Lundback M, Mandadi KK, Nims E, Runguphan W,Vaillancourt B, Varbanova-Herde M, DellaPenna D, McKnight TD, O'Connor S and Buell CR (2012) Development of transcriptomicresources for interrogating the biosynthesis of monoterpene indole alkaloids in medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 7: e52506
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hudson D, Guevara DR, Hand AJ, Xu Z, Hao L, Chen X, Zhu T, Bi Y-M, Rothstein SJ (2013) Rice cytokinin GATA transcription Factor1regulates chloroplast development and plant architecture. Plant Physiol 162: 132-144
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hudson D, Guevara D, Yaish MW, Hannam C, Long N, Clarke JD, Bi Y-M, Rothstein SJ (2011) GNC and CGA1 modulate chlorophyllbiosynthesis and glutamate synthase (GLU1/Fd-GOGAT) expression in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 6: e26765
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Inagaki N, Kinoshita K, Kagawa T, Tanaka A, Ueno O, Shimada H, Takano M (2015) Phytochrome B mediates the regulation ofchlorophyll biosynthesis through transcriptional regulation of ChlH and GUN4 in rice seedlings. PLoS ONE 10: e0135408
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jiao Y, Lau OS, Deng XW (2007) Light-regulated transcriptional networks in higher plants. Nat Rev Genet 8: 217-230Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. MolBiol Evol 30: 772-780
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kellner F, Kim J, Clavijo BJ, Hamilton JP, Childs KL, Vaillancourt B, Cepela J, Habermann M, Steuernagel B, Clissold L, McLay K, BuellCR, O'Connor SE (2015) Genome-guided investigation of plant natural product biosynthesis. Plant J 82: 680-692
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Klermund C, Ranftl QL, Diener J, Bastakis E, Richter R, Schwechheimer C (2016) LLM-domain B-GATA transcription factors promotestomatal development downstream of light signaling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyls. Plant Cell 28: 646-660
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kumar S, Bhatia S (2016) A polymorphic (GA/CT) n-SSR influences promoter activity of tryptophan decarboxylase gene in Catharanthusroseus L. Don. Sci Rep 6: 33280
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Larsen B, Fuller VL, Pollier J, Van Moerkercke A, Schweizer F, Payne R, Colinas M, O'connor SE, Goossens A, Halkier BA (2017)Identification of iridoid glucoside transporters in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Cell Physiol 58: 1507-1518
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Leivar P, Monte E (2014) PIFs: systems integrators in plant development. Plant Cell 26: 56-78Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouzé P, Rombauts S (2002) PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 325-327
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Levac D, Murata J, Kim WS, De Luca V (2008) Application of carborundum abrasion for investigating the leaf epidermis: molecularcloning of Catharanthus roseus 16-hydroxytabersonine-16-O-methyltransferase. Plant J 53: 225-236
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li CY, Leopold AL, Sander GW, Shanks JV, Zhao L, Gibson SI (2015) CrBPF1 overexpression alters transcript levels of terpenoidindole alkaloid biosynthetic and regulatory genes. Front Plant Sci 6: 818
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Li CY, Leopold AL, Sander GW, Shanks JV, Zhao L, Gibson SI (2013) The ORCA2 transcription factor plays a key role in regulation ofthe terpenoid indole alkaloid pathway. BMC Plant Biol 13: 155
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liscombe DK, O'Connor SE (2011) A virus-induced gene silencing approach to understanding alkaloid metabolism in Catharanthusroseus. Phytochemistry 72: 1969-1977
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liscombe DK, Usera AR, O'Connor SE (2010) Homolog of tocopherol C methyltransferases catalyzes N methylation in anticanceralkaloid biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 18793-18798
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Liu J, Gao F, Ren J, Lu X, Ren G, Wang R (2017) A novel AP2/ERF transcription factor CR1 regulates the accumulation of vindoline andserpentine in Catharanthus roseus. Front Plant Sci 8: 2082
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar S (2002) Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J 31: 777-786Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu Y, Tikunov Y, Schouten RE, Marcelis LF, Visser RG, Bovy A (2018) Anthocyanin biosynthesis and degradation mechanisms inSolanaceous vegetables: a review. Front Chem 6: 52
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu Z, Taub CC, McClung CR (1996) Identification of an Arabidopsis thaliana ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenaseactivase (RCA) minimal promoter regulated by light and the circadian clock. Plant Physiol 112: 43-51
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liu Z, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li P, Zhao C, Chen Y, Bi Y (2015) Phytochrome-interacting factors PIF4 and PIF5 negatively regulateanthocyanin biosynthesis under red light in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Sci 238: 64-72
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lowry JA, Atchley WR (2000) Molecular evolution of the GATA family of transcription factors: conservation within the DNA-bindingdomain. J Mol Evol 50: 103-115
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Manfield IW, Devlin PF, Jen C-H, Westhead DR, Gilmartin PM (2007) Conservation, convergence, and divergence of light-responsive,circadian-regulated, and tissue-specific expression patterns during evolution of the Arabidopsis GATA gene family. Plant Physiol 143:941-958
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Menke FL, Champion A, Kijne JW, Memelink J (1999) A novel jasmonate and elicitor-responsive element in the periwinkle secondarymetabolite biosynthetic gene Str interacts with a jasmonate and elicitor inducible AP2 domain transcription factor, ORCA2. EMBO J 18:4455-4463
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Moon J, Zhu L, Shen H, Huq E (2008) PIF1 directly and indirectly regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis to optimize the greening process inArabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9433-9438
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Newton A, Mackay J, Crossley M (2001) The N-terminal zinc finger of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 binds GATC motifs inDNA. J Biol Chem 276: 35794-35801
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Niehaus EM, Schumacher J, Burkhardt I, Rabe P, Münsterkötter M, Güldener U, Sieber CM, Dickschat JS, Tudzynski B (2017) TheGATA-type transcription factor Csm1 regulates conidiation and secondary metabolism in Fusarium fujikuroi. Front Microbiol 8: 1175
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Paik I, Kathare PK, Kim JI, Huq E (2017) Expanding roles of PIFs in signal integration from multiple processes. Mol Plant 10: 1035-1046Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pan Q, Mustafa NR, Tang K, Choi YH, Verpoorte R (2016) Monoterpenoid indole alkaloids biosynthesis and its regulation inCatharanthus roseus: a literature review from genes to metabolites. Phytochem Rev 15: 221-250
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pan Q, Wang Q, Yuan F, Xing S, Zhao J, Choi YH, Verpoorte R, Tian Y, Wang G, Tang K (2012) Overexpression of ORCA3 and G10H inCatharanthus roseus plants regulated alkaloid biosynthesis and metabolism revealed by NMR-metabolomics. PLoS ONE 7: e43038
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Patra B, Pattanaik S, Schluttenhofer C, Yuan L (2018) A network of jasmonate‐responsive bHLH factors modulate monoterpenoidindole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol 217: 1566-1581
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Pattanaik S, Werkman JR, Kong Q, Yuan L (2010) Site-directed mutagenesis and saturation mutagenesis for the functional study oftranscription factors involved in plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Methods Mol Biol 643: 47-57
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Paul P, Singh SK, Patra B, Sui X, Pattanaik S, Yuan L (2017) A differentially regulated AP2/ERF transcription factor gene cluster actsdownstream of a map kinase cascade to modulate terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. New Phytol 213:1107-1123
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pauw B, Hilliou FA, Martin VS, Chatel G, de Wolf CJ, Champion A, Pré M, van Duijn B, Kijne JW, van der Fits L, Memelink J (2004) Zincfinger proteins act as transcriptional repressors of alkaloid biosynthesis genes in Catharanthus roseus. J Biol Chem 279: 52940-52948
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Payne RM, Xu D, Foureau E, Carqueijeiro MIST, Oudin A, de Bernonville TD, Novak V, Burow M, Olsen C-E, Jones DM, Tatsis EC,Pendle A, Ann Halkier B, Geu-Flores F, Courdavault V, Nour-Eldin HH, O'Connor SE (2017) An NPF transporter exports a centralmonoterpene indole alkaloid intermediate from the vacuole. Nat Plants 3: 16208
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Peebles CA, Hughes EH, Shanks JV, San KY (2009) Transcriptional response of the terpenoid indole alkaloid pathway to theoverexpression of ORCA3 along with jasmonic acid elicitation of Catharanthus roseus hairy roots over time. Metab Eng 11: 76–86
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Pham VN, Kathare PK, Huq E (2018) Phytochromes and phytochrome interacting factors. Plant Physiol 176: 1025-1038Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Polturak G, Aharoni A (2018) "La Vie en Rose": Biosynthesis, sources, and applications of betalain pigments. Mol Plant 11: 7-22Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qu Y, Easson ML, Froese J, Simionescu R, Hudlicky T, De Luca V (2015) Completion of the seven-step pathway from tabersonine to theanticancer drug precursor vindoline and its assembly in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 6224-6229
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Qu Y, Safonova O, De Luca V (2019) Completion of the canonical pathway for assembly of anticancer drugs vincristine/vinblastine inCatharanthus roseus. Plant J 97:257-266.
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Ranftl QL, Bastakis E, Klermund C, Schwechheimer C (2016) LLM-domain containing B-GATA factors control different aspects ofcytokinin-regulated development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 170: 2295-2311
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Reyes JC, Muro-Pastor MI, Florencio FJ (2004) The GATA family of transcription factors in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol 134: 1718-1732
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Richter R, Bastakis E, Schwechheimer C (2013a) Cross-repressive interactions between SOC1 and the GATAs GNC and GNL/CGA1 inthe control of greening, cold tolerance, and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 162: 1992-2004
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Richter R, Behringer C, Müller IK, Schwechheimer C (2010) The GATA-type transcription factors GNC and GNL/CGA1 repressgibberellin signaling downstream from DELLA proteins and PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS. Genes Dev 24: 2093-2104
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Richter R, Behringer C, Zourelidou M, Schwechheimer C (2013b) Convergence of auxin and gibberellin signaling on the regulation ofthe GATA transcription factors GNC and GNL in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 13192-13197
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Rosado D, Gramegna G, Cruz A, Lira BS, Freschi L, de Setta N, Rossi M (2016) Phytochrome Interacting Factors (PIFs) in Solanumlycopersicum: Diversity, evolutionary history and expression profiling during different developmental processes. PLoS ONE 11:e0165929
Pubmed: Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schardl CL, Byrd AD, Benzion G, Altschuler MA, Hildebrand DF, Hunt AG (1987) Design and construction of a versatile system for theexpression of foreign genes in plants. Gene 61: 1-11
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Schweizer F, Colinas M, Pollier J, Van Moerkercke A, Bossche RV, de Clercq R, Goossens A (2018) An engineered combinatorialmodule of transcription factors boosts production of monoterpenoid indole alkaloids in Catharanthus roseus. Metab Eng 48: 150-162
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Shin J, Park E, Choi G (2007) PIF3 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in an HY5‐dependent manner with both factors directly bindinganthocyanin biosynthetic gene promoters in Arabidopsis. Plant J 49: 981-994
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sibéril Y, Benhamron S, Memelink J, Giglioli-Guivarc'h N, Thiersault M, Boisson B, Doireau P, Gantet P (2001) Catharanthus roseus G-box binding factors 1 and 2 act as repressors of strictosidine synthase gene expression in cell cultures. Plant Mol Biol 45: 477-488
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
St-Pierre B, De Luca V (1995) A cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase catalyzes the first step in the conversion of tabersonine tovindoline in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol 109: 131-139
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
St-Pierre B, Laflamme P, Alarco AM, De Luca V (1998) The terminal O-acetyltransferase involved in vindoline biosynthesis defines anew class of proteins responsible for coenzyme A-dependent acyl transfer. Plant J 14: 703-713
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sugimoto K, Takeda S, Hirochika H (2003) Transcriptional activation mediated by binding of a plant GATA-type zinc finger protein AGP1to the AG-motif (AGATCCAA) of the wound-inducible Myb gene NtMyb2. Plant J 36: 550-564
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sui X, Kumar Singh S, Patra B, Schluttenhofer C, Guo W, Pattanaik S, Yuan L (2018) Cross-family transcription factor interactionbetween MYC2 and GBFs modulates terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis. J Exp Bot 69: 4267-4281
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Suttipanta N, Pattanaik S, Kulshrestha M, Patra B, Singh SK, Yuan L (2011) The transcription factor CrWRKY1 positively regulates theterpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant Physiol 157: 2081-2093
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis usingmaximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731-2739
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Thamm AM, Qu Y, De Luca V (2016) Discovery and metabolic engineering of iridoid/secoiridoid and monoterpenoid indole alkaloidbiosynthesis. Phytochem Rev 15: 339-361
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Toledo-Ortiz G, Johansson H, Lee KP, Bou-Torrent J, Stewart K, Steel G, Rodríguez-Concepción M, Halliday KJ (2014) The HY5-PIFregulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genet 10: e1004416
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
van der Fits L, Memelink J (2000) ORCA3, a jasmonate-responsive transcriptional regulator of plant primary and secondary metabolism.Science 289: 295-297
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
van der Fits L, Zhang H, Menke FL, Deneka M, Memelink J (2000) A Catharanthus roseus BPF-1 homologue interacts with an elicitor-responsive region of the secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene Str and is induced by elicitor via a JA-independent signaltransduction pathway. Plant Mol Biol 44: 675-685
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Van Moerkercke A, Steensma P, Gariboldi I, Espoz J, Purnama PC, Schweizer F, Miettinen K, Vanden Bossche R, De Clercq R,Memelink J, Goossens A (2016) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor BIS2 is essential for monoterpenoid indole alkaloid www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
production in the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus. Plant J 88: 3-12Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Van Moerkercke A, Steensma P, Schweizer F, Pollier J, Gariboldi I, Payne R, Bossche RV, Miettinen K, Espoz J, Purnama PC, Kellner F,Seppänen-Laakso T, O'Connor SE, Rischer H, Memelink J, Goossens A (2015) The bHLH transcription factor BIS1 controls the iridoidbranch of the monoterpenoid indole alkaloid pathway in Catharanthus roseus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 8130-8135
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vazquez-Flota F, De Carolis E, Alarco AM, De Luca V (1997) Molecular cloning and characterization of desacetoxyvindoline-4-hydroxylase, a 2-oxoglutarate dependent-dioxygenase involved in the biosynthesis of vindoline in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.Plant Mol Biol 34: 935-948
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vazquez-Flota FA, De Luca V (1998) Developmental and light regulation of desacetoxyvindoline 4-hydroxylase in Catharanthus roseus(L.) G. Don. Evidence of a multilevel regulatory mechanism. Plant Physiol 117: 1351-1361
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vom Endt D, e Silva MS, Kijne JW, Pasquali G, Memelink J (2007) Identification of a bipartite jasmonate-responsive promoter elementin the Catharanthus roseus ORCA3 transcription factor gene that interacts specifically with AT-Hook DNA-binding proteins. PlantPhysiol 144: 1680-1689
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang C, Meng L, Gao Y, Grierson D, Fu D (2018) Manipulation of light signal transduction factors as a means of modifying steroidalglycoalkaloids accumulation in tomato leaves. Front Plant Sci 9: 437
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Weaver J, Goklany S, Rizvi N, Cram EJ, Lee-Parsons CW (2014) Optimizing the transient Fast Agro-mediated Seedling Transformation(FAST) method in Catharanthus roseus seedlings. Plant Cell Rep 33: 89-97
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Xu Z, Casaretto JA, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ (2017) Genome-wide binding analysis of AtGNC and AtCGA1 demonstrates their cross‐regulation and common and specific functions. Plant Direct 1: e00016
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yadav V, Mallappa C, Gangappa SN, Bhatia S, Chattopadhyay S (2005) A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor in Arabidopsis,MYC2, acts as a repressor of blue light–mediated photomorphogenic growth. Plant Cell 17: 1953-1966
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang H, Hedhili S, Montiel G, Zhang Y, Chatel G, Pré M, Gantet P, Memelink J (2011) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factorCrMYC2 controls the jasmonate-responsive expression of the ORCA genes that regulate alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthusroseus. Plant J 67: 61-71
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang Y, Mayba O, Pfeiffer A, Shi H, Tepperman JM, Speed TP, Quail PH (2013) A quartet of PIF bHLH factors provides atranscriptionally centered signaling hub that regulates seedling morphogenesis through differential expression-patterning of sharedtarget genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 9: e1003244
Pubmed: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon June 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2019 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.