1
The wool industry was once a huge economic force in the United States, from colonial times to the mid 1940’s. In 2015, the United States sheep industry has declined to 5.28 million heads of sheep across the country from 56 million heads of sheep in 1942 (USDA 2016). The United States had 80,000 sheep operations nationwide in 2012 (USDA/ASI 2013), producing over 27 million pounds of clean wool in 2015. (USDA 2015). US Wool Production Texas California Wyoming Colorado Utah 3,600,000 3,100,000 2,800,000 2,400,000 2,200,000 Top Wool Producing States in 2010 State Pounds Source: USDA/National Agriculture Statistics Data/ American Sheep Industry Association 2011 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 US Wool Production, 2000-2015 Year Million Pounds Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016 California is the second largest producer of wool in the United States. In 2013, California produced 3.141 million pounds of wool (FiberShed Wool Association 2013). Eighty three percent of the wool is fine enough (< 25 microns) for apparel use. California Wool Production 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 3.5 3.479 3.082 3.29 2.745 2.989 2.914 2.8035 2.6 2.898 California Wool Production in Pounds from 2005-2014 Year Pounds in Millions Source: Economic Research Service/ USDA/ Keithly G. Jones 2004 Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016 The decline in US wool production and wool textiles has been attributed to factors including (National Research Council 2008 pp. 1-4): Strong Foreign Competition – Australia has been the dominant wool producer. Australian wools are accounted for 51% wool apparel produced in the world (Australian Wool Innovation Limited). With second ranked sheep population in the world (9.5%), Australia also produced 27% of global greasy wool supply. Increasingly important is China which holds 15% and largest of the world’s sheep population. China is also the world’s largest importer of wool, valuing $1.3 billion in 2005. 1989 1991 199 3 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 0 100,000,000 200,000,000 300,000,000 400,000,000 500,000,000 600,000,000 US Wool Textile Imports From 1989 - 2014 Years Pounds Imported 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 0 50,000,000 100,000,000 150,000,000 200,000,000 250,000,000 US Wool Textile Exports from 1989 - 2014 Years Pounds Exported Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016 Loss of National Subsidies and Payment Programs – In 1994, the United States phased out its National Wool Act subsidy program. The Economic Research Service estimates that $551 million in income for sheep producers was effectively eliminated at the national level from 1994-1998 (Economic Research Service 1999 Report 105-558 p. 6). The lack of incentive programs increased the difficulty for United States producers to compete with large flock countries such as Australia and China. Change in the Income Distribution of Sheep Producers – For sheep producers, wool has become less and less profitable as compared to income from mutton and lamb meat. Wool contributed only about 10- 30% of total income for large range production farms and less than 5% in small farm flock production systems (National Research Council 2008 pp. 248). As the returns on wool decrease, farmers begin to focus more and more on sheep meat. Competition from Other Fibers – The increased demand for cotton and manufactured fiber (especially the synthetics) products also accounts for wool’s decline. In 2003 wool only accounted for 2.3% of total fiber use globally. The change in consumer preference has driven wool trade down significantly (Australian Wool Innovation 2005 p. 1). This low demand combined with increased competition and loss of government support are among reasons for a decreasing American wool industry. 198 9 199 1 199 3 199 5 199 7 199 9 2001 200 3 200 5 200 7 200 9 201 1 201 3 0 1,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 3,000,000,000 US Textile Exports By Fibers from 1989 - 2014 Cotton Linen Wool Silk Manmade Years Pounds Exported 0 2,000,000,000 4,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 10,000,000,000 12,000,000,000 US Textile Imports by Fibers From 1989 - 2014 Cotton Linen Wool Manmade Years Pounds Imported Wool Production Trend Source: National Agriculture Statistics Service/ California Agriculture Statistics Review 2015 Source: FiberShed Wool Mapping Project 2013 Wool Fiber Wool is a keratin protein fiber in colors from white to brown. Wool fibers vary greatly in diameters and in lengths from 4 – 100 cm long, depending on origins. Wool protein is composed of 18 different amino acids that combine together in a helix formation. The name of the polymer for wool is Keratin. Wool Production begins with the sheep. Different sheep produces different diameters and quality of wool. The most popular, the Merino sheep, is known for producing very fine high quality wool that is well suited for making comfortable clothing and garments. Breeds such as Suffolk and Hampshire are known for producing medium wool. At the other end of the spectrum are breeds such as the Lincoln breed and the Border Leicester breed, whose coarser fleeces are better for carpeting. Specialty wool can be derived from different breeds of animals. The popular cashmere is actually the fleece of the Cashmere Goat (Hatch 2006). Sheep Breeds Photo: Gordon Milligan/ Published: 06/06/2013 Photo: EAAP-Animal Genetic Bank Photo: Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images/ Published: 02/17/2016 Photo: Self-Sufficient Lving/ F. Ashan Published: 01/21/2014 Merino Sheep Lincoln Sheep Suffolk Sheep Cashmere Goat WOOL Count System – This system uses a unit of 560 yards called “Hanks”. Wool is graded based on how many hanks of yarns can be spun from 1 pound of wool fibers. For example, a 60 count system grade indicates that one pound of that wool would spin 60 Hanks or 60 x 560 or 33,600 yards of yarns. This is known as the indirect system in textiles, i.e., a larger grade indicates finer (smaller diameter) fibers. Micron System – This is the most accurate system, measuring the average fiber diameter by micrometer. This system was developed in the United States and is the standard for measuring United States wool. The general divide is fibers with diameters 25 microns and lower are considered fine while fibers 33 microns and higher are considered coarse. For apparel use, fibers under 25 microns are most commonly used. Fibers 30 microns and Source: American Wool Council – Wool Grades and the Sheep that Grow the Wool Wool Quality Source: American Wool Council – Wool Grades and the Sheep that Grow the Wool The fineness of the wool fiber affects properties such as comfort and hand. Wool fineness can be measured by (ASI-American Wool pp. 1-9): Blood System – This is the oldest measurement system based on the breed bloodline of the sheep that produces the wool. Beginning with breeds such as Merino and Rambouillet, which produce finer wools, the sheep is categorized based on how much the animal’s pedigree deviates from those breeds. From finest to coarsest, the 6 categories are: Full Blood, ½ Blood, 3/8, ¼, ¼ Low, and Common. Tex as Ari zona Cal ifornia Pen nsyl vania Iow a 8700 5000 4100 3800 3500 Top 5 States in Sheep Operations 2012 State Number of Operations Source: USDA/National Agriculture Statistics Service/ American Sheep 2013 Gary Hua, BS in ARE, TXC Minor (2016) University of California, Davis Sponsored by Prof. You-Lo Hsieh Textile Export-Import Trend The most distinguishing aspect of the wool fiber structure is the presence of scales that make up the cuticle of the fiber. Generally, the finer the fiber the more scales present, ranging from 700 scales per inch to 2000 scales per inch. The reason wool shrinks during wash is due to these scales in a process called felting shrinkage. This is when the individual fibers lock their scales onto each other and curl up when agitated in water. An interesting property of wool is its ability to resist flames. When exposed to a flame, wool will smolder and give off smoke before extinguishing itself. This is the result of its chemistry and ability to hold moisture (Hatch 2006).

Gary Hua Wool Research Project

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gary Hua Wool Research Project

The wool industry was once a huge economic force in the United States, from colonial times to the mid 1940’s.

In 2015, the United States sheep industry has declined to 5.28 million heads of sheep across the country from

56 million heads of sheep in 1942 (USDA 2016). The United States had 80,000 sheep operations nationwide

in 2012 (USDA/ASI 2013), producing over 27 million pounds of clean wool in 2015. (USDA 2015).

US Wool Production

Texas California Wyoming Colorado Utah

3,600,000

3,100,0002,800,000

2,400,0002,200,000

Top Wool Producing States in 2010

State

Pou

nds

Source: USDA/National Agriculture Statistics Data/ American Sheep Industry Association 2011

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

US Wool Production, 2000-2015

Year

Mill

ion

Pou

nds

Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016

California is the second largest producer of wool in the United States. In 2013, California produced 3.141 million pounds of wool (FiberShed Wool Association 2013). Eighty

three percent of the wool is fine enough (< 25 microns) for apparel use.

California Wool Production

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

43.5 3.479

3.0823.29

2.7452.989 2.914 2.8035

2.62.898

California Wool Production in Pounds from 2005-2014

Year

Pou

nds

in M

illio

ns

Source: Economic Research Service/ USDA/ Keithly G. Jones 2004

Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016

The decline in US wool production and wool textiles has been attributed to factors

including (National Research Council 2008 pp. 1-4):

Strong Foreign Competition – Australia has been the dominant wool producer.

Australian wools are accounted for 51% wool apparel produced in the world

(Australian Wool Innovation Limited). With second ranked sheep population in the

world (9.5%), Australia also produced 27% of global greasy wool supply.

Increasingly important is China which holds 15% and largest of the world’s sheep

population. China is also the world’s largest importer of wool, valuing $1.3 billion in

2005. 1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

0

100,000,000

200,000,000

300,000,000

400,000,000

500,000,000

600,000,000

US Wool Textile Imports From 1989 - 2014

Years

Pou

nds

Impo

rted

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

0

50,000,000

100,000,000

150,000,000

200,000,000

250,000,000US Wool Textile Exports from 1989 - 2014

Years

Pou

nds

Exp

orte

d

Source: USDA/ National Agriculture Statistics Service 2016

Loss of National Subsidies and Payment Programs – In 1994, the United

States phased out its National Wool Act subsidy program. The Economic

Research Service estimates that $551 million in income for sheep producers was

effectively eliminated at the national level from 1994-1998 (Economic Research

Service 1999 Report 105-558 p. 6). The lack of incentive programs increased the

difficulty for United States producers to compete with large flock countries such

as Australia and China.

Change in the Income Distribution of Sheep Producers – For sheep

producers, wool has become less and less profitable as compared to income

from mutton and lamb meat. Wool contributed only about 10- 30% of total

income for large range production farms and less than 5% in small farm flock

production systems (National Research Council 2008 pp. 248). As the returns on

wool decrease, farmers begin to focus more and more on sheep meat.

Competition from Other Fibers – The increased demand for cotton and

manufactured fiber (especially the synthetics) products also accounts for wool’s

decline. In 2003 wool only accounted for 2.3% of total fiber use globally. The

change in consumer preference has driven wool trade down significantly

(Australian Wool Innovation 2005 p. 1).

This low demand combined with increased competition and loss of government

support are among reasons for a decreasing American wool industry.

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

0500,000,000

1,000,000,0001,500,000,0002,000,000,0002,500,000,0003,000,000,000

US Textile Exports By Fibers from 1989 - 2014

Cotton Linen WoolSilk Manmade

YearsPou

nds

Exp

orte

d

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

0

2,000,000,000

4,000,000,000

6,000,000,000

8,000,000,000

10,000,000,000

12,000,000,000

US Textile Imports by Fibers From 1989 - 2014

Cotton Linen Wool Manmade

Years

Pou

nds

Impo

rted

Wool Production TrendSource: National Agriculture Statistics Service/ California Agriculture Statistics Review 2015Source: FiberShed Wool Mapping Project 2013

Wool FiberWool is a keratin protein fiber in colors from white to brown. Wool fibers vary greatly in diameters and in lengths

from 4 – 100 cm long, depending on origins. Wool protein is composed of 18 different amino acids that combine

together in a helix formation. The name of the polymer for wool is Keratin.

Wool Production begins with the sheep. Different sheep produces different diameters and quality of wool. The most popular, the

Merino sheep, is known for producing very fine high quality wool that is well suited for making comfortable clothing and garments.

Breeds such as Suffolk and Hampshire are known for producing medium wool. At the other end of the spectrum are breeds such

as the Lincoln breed and the Border Leicester breed, whose coarser fleeces are better for carpeting. Specialty wool can be

derived from different breeds of animals. The popular cashmere is actually the fleece of the Cashmere Goat (Hatch 2006).

Sheep Breeds

Photo: Gordon Milligan/ Published: 06/06/2013 Photo: EAAP-Animal Genetic Bank

Photo: Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images/ Published: 02/17/2016

Photo: Self-Sufficient Lving/ F. Ashan Published: 01/21/2014

Merino Sheep Lincoln Sheep

Suffolk Sheep Cashmere Goat

WOOL

• Count System – This system uses a unit of 560

yards called “Hanks”. Wool is graded based on

how many hanks of yarns can be spun from 1

pound of wool fibers. For example, a 60 count

system grade indicates that one pound of that

wool would spin 60 Hanks or 60 x 560 or 33,600

yards of yarns. This is known as the indirect

system in textiles, i.e., a larger grade indicates

finer (smaller diameter) fibers.

• Micron System – This is the most accurate

system, measuring the average fiber diameter

by micrometer. This system was developed in

the United States and is the standard for

measuring United States wool. The general

divide is fibers with diameters 25 microns and

lower are considered fine while fibers 33

microns and higher are considered coarse. For

apparel use, fibers under 25 microns are most

commonly used. Fibers 30 microns and higher

can be felt by the skin, causing irritation.

Source: American Wool Council – Wool Grades and the Sheep that Grow the Wool

Wool Quality

Source: American Wool Council – Wool Grades and the Sheep that Grow the Wool

The fineness of the wool fiber affects properties such as comfort and hand. Wool fineness can be measured by (ASI-American Wool

pp. 1-9):

• Blood System – This is the oldest measurement system based on the breed bloodline of the sheep that produces the wool.

Beginning with breeds such as Merino and Rambouillet, which produce finer wools, the sheep is categorized based on how

much the animal’s pedigree deviates from those breeds. From finest to coarsest, the 6 categories are: Full Blood, ½ Blood,

3/8, ¼, ¼ Low, and Common.

Texas Ari zona Cal i fornia Pennsylvania Iowa

8700

5000

4100

3800

3500

Top 5 States in Sheep Operations 2012

StateN

umbe

r of O

pera

tions

Source: USDA/National Agriculture Statistics Service/ American Sheep 2013

Gary Hua, BS in ARE, TXC Minor (2016)University of California, DavisSponsored by Prof. You-Lo Hsieh

Textile Export-Import Trend

The most distinguishing aspect of the wool fiber structure

is the presence of scales that make up the cuticle of the

fiber. Generally, the finer the fiber the more scales

present, ranging from 700 scales per inch to 2000 scales

per inch. The reason wool shrinks during wash is due to

these scales in a process called felting shrinkage. This is

when the individual fibers lock their scales onto each

other and curl up when agitated in water. An interesting

property of wool is its ability to resist flames. When

exposed to a flame, wool will smolder and give off smoke

before extinguishing itself. This is the result of its

chemistry and ability to hold moisture (Hatch 2006).