7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

1/23

Construction of New Faculties/Buildings, Expansions in theConstruction of New Faculties/Buildings, Expansions in the

Existing Buildings ,Existing Buildings , Renewing Works and Extension ofRenewing Works and Extension ofInfrastructuresInfrastructures

Garyounis University /BenghaziGaryounis University /Benghazi

DESIGN WORKS PROCEDUREDESIGN WORKS PROCEDURE

Doc. No. : GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-004-00

P r e p a r e d b y

Rev DateReason for

IssuePrepared By Checked By Approved by Approved by

ARCADIS

00 08.12.2010 First Issue A.AHN A.AHN B.DURUKAN

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

2/23

REVISION DESCRIPTION

ParaNo.

Description Page NoRevision Status

00 0A 01 01A 02 02A

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 2 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

3/23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Construction of New Faculties/Buildings, Expansions in the Existing Buildings , RenewingWorks and Extension of Infrastructures..........................................................................1Garyounis University /Benghazi.....................................................................................1DESIGN WORKS PROCEDURE...................................................................................11.PURPOSE AND SCOPE ............................................................................................42.DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................4

3.REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................54.RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................................................................................55.DESIGN REALIZATION PROCESS :..........................................................................76.INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.....................................................................147.ALTERATIONS TO THIS PROCEDURE..................................................................148.APPENDIXES...........................................................................................................15

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 3 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

4/23

1.PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of the Design Control procedure is to describe the control and verificationactivities to be performed in order to:

Ensure quality of documents, drawings and other deliverables. Ensure that all relevant information is correctly included and that specified input

requirements are met. This procedure describes the system for control and verification of design and

engineering activities performed by resources for construction design drawings andcalculations in Garyounis University Project.

Measures for control and verification of engineering activities includes: Self Checks (mandatory), Discipline Checks (mandatory), Inter-Discipline Checks (project related), Operational Reviews (project related), Client Reviews (Consultant/Client).

The Design Control procedure is an overall procedure, which in principal should cover allactivities in connection with planning and preparation of drawings/documents.

However, in projects, tenders or studies there may be need for more specificprocedures/plans in order to ensure implementation of control and verification with respect to

engineering activities. In such cases, this Design Control procedure will form basis for specificprocedures/plans.

2.DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Drawings/documentsDrawings/documents originating by Contractor which are subject todocument control.

Project Manager Responsible person for a specific work, i.e. project, tender, study

Discipline LeadResponsible person for a discipline i.e. engineering, operation.Business support in a project, study or tender.

Originator Responsible person for preparing the drawings/technical documents

Engineeringactivities All activities associated with planning and preparation ofdrawings/documents.

StudyAll activities in connection with planning and preparation ofdocuments/drawing which are not defined in a project or a tender.

Client ODAC (Organization for Development of Administrative Centers)

Consultant ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH

ContractorSembol Libya JS General Construction Company, Anayurt Libya JSGeneral Construction Company and Sembol and Anayurt JSGeneral Construction Company

SubcontractorCORPUSSubcontractor of Design, Engineering, Procurement and

HR providing service to GARUN projects Main Contractor.

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 4 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

5/23

3.REFERENCES

ISO 9001:2008 Quality management systems Requirements GARUN-36-QA-GN-GN-PR-0001-00 Document Numbering Procedure IBC 2006: General Design standards Mechanical: International Mechanical Code (IMC). American Society of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

Standard 62. International Plumbing Code (IPC). EN806.02 and .03, and EN 12056.02 and .03 plumbing code. NFPA 70 National Electrical Code ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings, Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings GECOL : General Electricity Company of Libya , GECOL DIN - Deutsches Institut fr Normung eV (German Institute for Standardization) NFPA 101: Life Safety Code

4.RESPONSIBILITIES

This procedure is under the responsibility of the Project Manager and shall not be alteredwithout his written consent.

The procedure is applicable for all Garyounis University Project personnel.

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 5 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

http://www.zawya.com/cm/profile.cfm/cid1001367http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Deutsches+Institut+f%C3%BCr+Normung+eVhttp://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Deutsches+Institut+f%C3%BCr+Normung+eVhttp://www.zawya.com/cm/profile.cfm/cid1001367

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

6/23

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 6 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

7/23

INTERNAL DESIGN REALISATIONPROCESS

5.DESIGN REALIZATION PROCESS :

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-004-00 Page 6 of 23

DELIVERY TOTHE SITE

Y

N

N

Y

N

Y

DESIGN SUBCONTRACTORCOMPLETION OF DRAFT DESIGN

OUTPUTS(LAD,TUNCA,AND OTHER THIRD

PARTY DESIGNERS etc.)

CONSULTANTS ??? DAYSREVIEW PROCESS

DETERMINATION OF DESIGN INPUTFINALISATION OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED

PROCESS, NEED

CONFIRMATION OF INPUTS AND APPROVALS(FROM WHOM WE GET THE DESIGN INPUT

DATAS?)

DECISIONS &APPROVALS OF

CONSULTANTON DESIGN

DATA

REALIZATION OF DESIGN

VERIFICATION OF DESIGN OUTPUTS

REVIEW OF DESIGN OUTPUTS

APPROVAL OFCORPUS

ISSUE TO CONSULTANTS REVIEW

APPROVAL OFDESIGN DOCUMENT

BY CONSULTANT

TransmittalForm

TransmittalForm

DETERMINATION OF CLIENTREQUIREMENTS (HOW? MAY BE BY PRE-

SCHEMATICS,SCHEATICS, FUNCTIONALITYREPORTS ETC.)

RECEIVING TECHNICAL DATA FROM CLIENT (HOW?? NEED TO GVE SOME DETAILS FOR

THIS PROCESS)

TransmittalForm

-Emails-MinutesofMeeting-ConceptualDesignApprovals-Officialletters?????????

TransmittalForm

CONTRACTOR

QUALITY REVIEW OF DESIGNDOCUMENT (KYS)

RELEASE FORCONSTRUCTION

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

8/23

5.1 Design planning

The design work scope, than the following process should be performed literally; Perform Design Basis review (may be part of the Contract review) in order to ensure

the Design Basis is complete, consistent, unambiguous and fully understood by thedesign team. Responsible to initiate and accomplish the design basis review is theProject Manager. The result should be a Design Basis report (Contract Reviewreport).

Establish document and drawing register and schedule with planned dates for startup; Inter-Discipline Check, External Review and Issue for Construction. Names ofOriginators shall be established.

Review of necessary Risk Management activities such as HAZID/HAZOP etc. andinclude in Risk Management Activity Plan.

Identify external interfaces and establish Interface plan/register.

5.2 VerificationThe different categories directly related to check/review/verify of drawings/documentsperformed by resources from Engineering department (or under the coordination ofengineering department in case of the works given to a design subcontractor) are asfollows:Self Check (SC)Discipline Check (DC)Inter-Discipline Check (IDC)Operational ReviewExternal Review(Third Party and Client)

Issue For Construction (IFC)

5.2.1 Self Check (SC) - Mandatory

Self Check shall be performed by Originator as the engineering work progresses and willin general be split into two phases:

In daily work to ensure that input requirements are incorporated at the end of the activityin order to ensure that work is completed and meets specified requirementsAll computer analysis shall, where possible, be verified by sufficient longhand calculations.All relevant analysis, drafts, sketches, longhand calculations, comments post DC and acopy of the document issued shall be kept and filed by the Originator within the History filesystem.

Originator is responsible for initiating Discipline Check (DC) which is a mandatory.

5.2.2 Discipline Check (DC) - Mandatory

After Originators Self Check the drawing/document shall be given to an appointedChecker for review in order to ensure that input requirements are met the engineeringwork and, if relevant, operation methods chosen are correct.

Check List Discipline Check in Attachment A shall be filled in by Originator and be

given to appointed Checker together with the drawing/document for review andverification.Check List Discipline Check, drawing/document signed by appointed Checker and

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 8 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

9/23

relevant comments from Checker, shall be returned to Originator for filing within theHistory file system.

5.2.3 Inter-Discipline Check (IDC)

The purpose of the Inter-Discipline Check is to ensure and confirm that all agreedtechnical interfaces are adhered to and that technical interface conflicts with otherdisciplines are avoided.Discipline Lead of originating discipline is responsible for issuing engineeringdrawings/documents for Inter-Discipline Check and for responding on comments in writingwithin governing time limits.Before initiating Inter-Discipline Check Check List Inter-Discipline Check in AttachmentB shall be filled in by Originator and be given to appointed Checker together with thedrawing/document for review and verification.

Checker shall sign Check List Inter-Discipline Check and the drawing/document beforeany further distribution.Check List Inter-Discipline Check, drawing/document signed by appointed Checkerand relevant comments from Checker, shall be returned to Originator for filing within theHistory file system.

Comments shall be addressed directly to Originator for filing within the History file system.All comments received shall be evaluated. In cases of disagreement, the subject shall bediscussed and agreed upon. If, however, an agreement is impossible to obtain, thecommenting discipline shall be informed. Agreements/disagreement of this sort shallresult in a written statement, which shall be filed within the History file system. DisciplineLead will handle the discussion if an agreement can not be obtained.

As an alternative, IDC may be arranged as a meeting where comments to the extentpossible are resolved on the spot and documented on the relevant drawings/documents.

Discipline Leads shall arrange a thorough check of incoming Inter-Discipline Check issuesby qualified personnel within the discipline.In case of need for clarifications, the responsible personnel are encouraged tocommunicate with the Originator of drawing/document.Inter-Discipline Check shall be carried out on all issues according to Check List Inter-Discipline Check in Attachment B.A completed copy of Check List Inter-Discipline Check , shall be signed byresponsible Checker on behalf of the discipline and returned together with relevantcomments to responsible person for further distribution and filing.

5.2.5 Signing off Quality Control Sheets

When the drawing is signed after step 5.2.4 , a copy of the drawing and the signed checklist shall be taken for the DC check. This copy (checked copy) shall be handed over to theappointed checking engineer for DC, together with a signed check list and the QCS(enclosure (i ) of this document).

The QCS shall be signed to verify that this check has been performed. In addition theResponsible Engineer shall specify on this sheet the status of the drawing and his/herown personal evaluation of the work performed before the document issue. This is a

relevant information to the Discipline Checker, Lead Discipline Engineer and JacketDesign Lead since the level of completion may vary depending on the reason for issue.

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 9 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

10/23

5.2.8 Operational Reviews

Operational Reviews may be performed by one or several in-house specialists who shalladdress the operational principles, assumptions, considerations and premises on whichthe decisions were taken.All Operational Reviews shall be identified in a Verification Plan, and shall go through thefollowing steps:Issue agenda and relevant drawings/documents to all participants including, as required,tailor made checklists.Minute all actions with action responsibilities and due dates.Establish action follow up log.Ensure all actions are closed before Issue for Construction.All relevant documentation related to Checks and Reviews shall be controlled and filed byDiscipline Lead.

5.2.9 Clients Review/Approval (Client/Clients Represantative)

Contractually,Client(or Employer) and Third party shall review/approve the drawings/documents before they are subject to Issue for Construction.Project Manager is responsible for issuing drawings/documents for External Review andfor responding on comments in writing within governing time limits.Before initiating External Review, Check List External Review in Attachment C shallbe filled in by Originator and be given to appointed Checker together with thedrawing/document for review and verification.Check List External Review, drawing/document signed by appointed Checker andrelevant comments from Checker, shall be returned to Originator for filing within the

History file system.All drawings/documents subject to issue for External Review shall be approved by ProjectManager. Project Manager shall review the quality control performed and question thevalidity of items noted therein. Having verified the activities of Originator and Checker, theProject Manager shall sign the drawing/document. By this signature Project Managerconfirms that the drawing/document meets the specified requirements and accepts theassociated responsibility for external distribution.Drawings/documents shall be issued for External Review through the responsible personof document controlling who is also responsible for filing/protecting and distribution ofdrawings/documents by being in cooperation with the Originator. The external reviewperiods shall be planned and agreed upon with Client/Third party management.Comments shall be addressed directly to Originator for filing within the History file system.All comments received shall be evaluated. In cases of disagreement, the subject shall bediscussed and agreed upon. Any agreement of this sort shall result in a written statementwhich shall be filed within the History file system. If, however, an agreement is impossibleto obtain, further discussions will be handled by the Project Manager.

5.2.10 Issue for Construction (IFC)

When Employer/Employers Represantative comments are properly incorporated andContract requirements are implemented the drawings/documents shall be subject to Issuefor Construction.Project Manager is responsible for issuing drawings/documents for Construction.

Before initiating Issue for Construction Check List Issued for Construction inAttachment G shall be filled in by Originator and be given to the Checker whom appointedby the Client ,together with the drawing/document for review and verification.

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 10 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

11/23

Check List Issued for Construction, drawing/document signed by appointed Checker

and relevant comments from Checker, shall be returned to Originator for filing within theHistory file system.

All drawings/documents subject to issue for Construction shall be approved by ProjectManager. Project Manager shall review the quality control performed and question thevalidity of items noted therein. Having verified the activities of Originator and Checker, theProject Manager shall sign the drawing/document. By this signature Project Managerconfirms that the drawing/document meets the specified requirements and accepts theassociated responsibility for external distribution. The drawings/documents shall be readyto issue to the Employer/Engineers review and approval.,

All design assumptions and conditions identified through HAZOPs etc. shall be checked

and closed before Issued for Construction.

Drawings/documents shall be in a revision status which is , Issued for Construction, to theEmployer or through the responsible person of document controlling, who is alsoresponsible for filing,storing and retrieval of these drawings/documents.

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 11 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

12/23

1.3 Title Block

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 12 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

13/23

5.3 Signatures on Drawings/Documents on Title Block

Signatures on drawings/documents front sheet are evidence that the various checks havebeen performed to the satisfaction of the signatories.Required signatures are as follows:

All drawings/documents shall be signed by Originator on all issues and revisions. All drawings/documents issued for Discipline Check and Inter-Discipline Check shall be:-Checked and signed by appointed Checker

The issue for Discipline Check and Inter-Discipline Check may be combined.

All drawings/documents issued for Clients Review and Issued for Construction shall be:-Checked and signed by appointed Checker -Approved and signed by Project Manager and shallbe reviewed and approved by the Employer/Engineer.

5.4 Responsibilities

5.4.1 Check and VerificationThe principal requirement that each individual is responsible for own work shall beapplied, involving planning, execution and verifying that the engineering work is inaccordance with specified requirements.

5.4.2 Project Manager

Project Manager is responsible for:

Determine the extent of verification according to this procedure establishing a work

specific verification plan in order to ensure that this Design Control procedure is implemented inthe further work approval of drawings/documents for Clients Review, Issue for Construction andall following revisions .

5.4.3 Discipline Lead

Discipline Lead is responsible for:

Providing Originator with all relevant information for performance of the engineering work Ensuring availability of all necessary check lists Appointing the disciplines Checkers Ensuring that all checks are being performed Initiating Inter-Discipline Check

5.4.4 Originator

Originator is responsible for:

Perform engineering and design in accordance with good engineering practice seekingoptimal cost efficient design solutions Familiarising with input requirements and check lists Perform Self Check and initiate Discipline Check on drawings/documents

5.5 Revision Marking

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 13 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

14/23

Changes to document and drawings shall be marked with revision triangle placedadjacent to the text that has been changed from previous revision. A line shall be placed

in the margin to specify in detail where the changes have been done .

Figure 2. An example of revision triangle

5.6 History file

The History file system shall be used to file all revisions of a drawing/document, CheckLists, design input notes, comments and mark up documentation. Each drawing/documentshall be filed in a separate folder. The originator of the drawing/document shall establishthe folder and use it to organise the filing of the work related to the drawing/document.Upon completed drawing/document (Issued for Construction), the History file shall behanded over to the person responsible for document control.

5.7 Filing and retention of quality records

In addition to filing requirements described under each chapter/section above, specificrequirements for filing and retention of documentation as quality records given by Clientshall be observed.

As a minimum all check prints/Check Lists and Issued for Constructiondrawings/documents shall be kept in a safe place for 2 years or as long as the guaranteeperiod is effective.

Yukardaki ksmlar/blmlerde betimlenmi olan dosyalama artlarna ilave olarak,Mteri tarafndan kalite kaytlarnn saklanmasyla ilgili verilen zel artlar dagzetilecektir.Tm kontrol ktlar/kontrol listeleri ve naat iin Yaymlanan izimler/dkmanlar gvenlibir yerde en az 2 yl garanti periyodunun geerli olduu sre boyunca muhafazaedilmelidir.

6. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

It is the policy of Sembol Anayurt JV to protect and actively manage its IntellectualProperty Rights. Sembol Anayurt JV personnel shall thus actively manage our IntellectualProperty and obtain protecetion of the key features that differentiate us from our clients,suppliers and competitors through the application of patents, trademarks, registereddesigns and confidentiality / secrecy agreements with his members of staff areencouraged to identify and propose patentable or otherwise commercially viableinventions to Project Director who will recommend/not recommend and send to TechnicalDepartment in CORPUSs Head Quarters for further action.

7. ALTERATIONS TO THIS PROCEDURE

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 14 of 23

Rev01

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

15/23

This procedure is the responsibility of the QA/QC Manager and cannot be altered withouthis written consent.

8.APPENDIXES

A. FLOWCHART FOR QUALITY CHECKING OF DRAWINGSB. FLOWCHART FOR QUALITY CHECKING OF DRAWINGSC. CHECK LIST - DISCIPLINE CHECK (DC)D. CHECK LIST INTER DISCIPLINE CHECK (IDC)E. CHECK LIST EXTERNAL REVIEW (ER)F. CHECK LIST ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)G. CHECK LIST ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)H. QUALITY CONTROL SHEET(QCS)

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 15 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

16/23

A. FLOWCHART FOR QUALITY CHECKING OF DRAWINGS:

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 16 of 23

ResponsibleEngineer(Originator)

Prepare Input to DrawingPerform Self Check of Input

DisciplineChecker

Perform Discipline Check, incl. clarifications w/Resp. Eng.Prepare and sign DCL and sign Check CopyInclude a brief status of the drawing in the QCS

Forward Check Copy, QCS, SCL & DCL to Lead DisciplineEngineer who approves by signing the Check Copy and the DCL

DisciplineChecker

ResponsibleEngineer(Originator)

Update Drawing, re-evaluate SCL, QCS.

Forward Check Copy, QCS, SCL, DCL and updated drawing toDiscipline Checker

Review updated drawing, check that agreed comments areincorporated. Sign OCS and include additional comments on the QCS.Forward Updated Drawing, Check copy, QCS, SCL & DCL to JacketDesign Lead for Approval

QEHSRepresentative

Ensure that the drawing is quality checked according to thisQuality Checking Proc. & appr. by signing the QCS

Issue drawingaccording tointerfacedistribution

Issue IDCS w/drawing to all Lead Disp.Lead DisciplineEngineer

Collect comments

Other Lead Disc.Eng.

Check Drawing, Prepare andSign QCS.Forward Check copy, QCS,SCL to Discipline Checker

(Lead Disc. Eng.)

Review drawing, commenting, sign off IDCSand return to Lead Disc. Engineer

Lead DisciplineEngineer

Prepare DrawingPerform Drafting Self checkReturn Drawing to Resp. Eng.

Draftsman

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

17/23

B. FLOWCHART FOR QUALITY CHECKING OF REPORTS:

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 17 of 23

ResponsibleEngineer(Originator)

Prepare ReportPerform Self checkPrepare QCS and SCLForward Check copy, SCL, QCS to DC

DisciplineChecker

Perform Discipline Check, incl. clarifications w/Resp. Eng.Prepare and sign DCL and sign Check CopyInclude a brief status of the report in the QCS

Forward Check Copy, QCS, SCL & DCL to LeadDiscipline Engineer who approves by signing the CheckCopy and the DCL

DisciplineChecker

ResponsibleEngineer

(Originator)

Update Report, re-evaluate SCL, QCS.Forward Check Copy, QCS, SCL, DCL and Updated Report toDiscipline Checker

Review updated report, check that agreed comments areincorporated.Sign OCS and include additional comments on the QCSForward Updated Report, Check copy, QCS, SCL & DCL to JacketDesign Lead for Approval

QEHSRepresentrative

Ensure that the reports quality checked according to this QualityChecking Procedure and approve by signing the QCS

Issue reportaccording tointerfacedistribution

Issue IDCS w/report to all Lead Disp. Eng.Lead DisciplineEngineer

Review report, commenting, sign off IDCSand return to Lead Discipline Engineer.

Other Lead DisciplineEngineers

(Lead Discipline Eng.)

Collect commentsLead DisciplineEngineer

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

18/23

CHECK LIST - DISCIPLINE CHECK (DC)

Purpose: The purpose of the Discipline Check (DC) is to ensure that the work is carried outcorrectly according to requirements, regulations and current practice.

Administration: Originator shall file original copy of Check List.

Check Point Text/references Date Sign.A Check that input to calculations and

drawing/document are in accordancewith input specifications, regulatorybodies requirements and WarrantySurveyors requirements

B Check that calculations and

drawing/document are correct, e.g.numbers, scales of drawings, notationsetc. are correct

C Check overall drawing/document quality,i.e. assumptions and reference made,consistency of data used, structuring andformat of drawing/document andlanguage

D Check adequacy of calculation methods,assumptions and computer programused, including validation check ofprograms as found required

E Check calculations and analysis toensure all required load and functionalconditions are considered

F Check adequacy of results and possiblequalifications made, if necessary bysimple long-hand calculations

G Check if adequate safety considerationshave been made in the overall detaileddesign of systems, structures andoperations

H Check if adequate operational practicality

considerations have been made in theoverall detailed design of systems,structures and operations

I Identify and pay special attention to the 3most critical areas of the document.

1)2)3)

J Is the document clear, readable and inaccordance with project procedures?

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 18 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

19/23

C. CHECK LIST INTER DISCIPLINE CHECK (IDC)

Purpose: The purpose of the Inter-Discipline Check (IDC) is to ensure that agreed solutionsare adhered to, and that interface conflicts are avoided

Administration: Originator shall file original copy of Check List.

Check Point Text/references Date Sign.A Check and identify possible

conflicts/problems at the interface withother engineering disciplines, e.g.arrangements, safety, access, loadingetc.

B Check of conformance to technical andfunctional requirements to systems,structures and operations

C Check of conflict with establishedmethods and schedules for construction and operations

D Check of conflict with contractual andadministrative routines and obligations,hereunder also document format, formof presentation, reference to workbasis documents and other relevantdeliverables etc.

E Check if adequate safetyconsiderations have been made in theoverall detailed design of systems,structures and operations

F Intellectual Property awareness. Aresolutions/methods developed subjectto protection of inventions/designs bysecrecy agreement, applications forpatents, trademarks, design rights etc.Infringement of others IntellectualProperty?

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 19 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

20/23

D. INTER DISCIPLINE CIRCULATION SHEET

INTER DISCIPLINE CIRCULATION SHEET:PROJECTNO.:

TITLE: CLIENT:

DOCUMENTS/DRAWINGS SUBJECT FOR CHECKNUMBER: TITLE: Issuing Disc.

Acceptance code (AC):

AC = 1 No commentsAC = 2 CommentsAC = 3 Doc./Drawing considered as not relevant for the DisciplineDiscipline:

Str. AnalysesTemporaryPhase

Str. AnalysesPermanentPhase

Civil/StructuralDesign

ArchitecturalDesign

MechanicalDesign

ElectricalDesign

Rev./Date:

AC/sign/date AC/sign/date AC/sign/date AC/sign/date AC/sign/date AC/sign/date

Comments from Str. Analyses Temporary Phase:Rev.:

Rev.:

Comments from Str. Analyses Permanent Phase:Rev.:

Rev.:

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 20 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

21/23

Comments from Civil/Structural Design:Rev.:

Rev.:

Comments from Architectural Design:Rev.:

Rev.:

Comments from Mechanical Design:Rev.:

Rev.:

Comments from Electrical&Instrument Design:Rev.:

Rev.:

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 21 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

22/23

E. CHECK LIST CLIENTS REVIEW

Purpose: The purpose of the Clients Review is to ensure that Inter-Discipline Checkcomments are properly incorporated.

Administration: Originator shall file original copy of Check List.

Check Point Text/references Date Sign.A Check if IDC comments are in conflict

with established methods andschedules for construction andoperations

B Check if IDC comments are in conflictwith contractual and administrative

routines and obligations, hereunderalso document format, form ofpresentation, references to workbasis documents and other relevantdeliverables etc

C Are all IDC comments acceptable? Ifnot, is the matter solved with the IDCchecker and a written statement ofthe result enclosed to the Check List?

D Are any other comments than IDCcomments received at this stage? If

yes, are they incorporated?E Are all IDC comments properly

incorporated in the document beforeissue?

F Have any approved changeproposals/variation orders affectedthis drawing/document?

G Intellectual Property awareness. Aresolutions/methods developed subjectto protection of inventions/designs by

secrecy agreement, applications forpatents, trademarks, design rightsetc. Infringement of othersIntellectual Property?

GARUN-4-XXX-QU-XXX-PR-0004-00 Page 22 of 23

DESIGN WORKS PROSEDURE

7/30/2019 Garun 4 Xxx Qu Xxx Pr 004 00 Design Works Procedure as 20.11.2010

23/23

Design Works Procedure

F. CHECK LIST ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION (IFC)

Purpose: The purpose of the Issued for Construction is to ensure that Third Part Verification

comments are properly incorporated and that the Contract requirements areimplemented.

Administration: Originator shall file original of Check List.

Check Point Text/references Date Sign.A Check if Client/Consultant comments are

in conflict with established methods andschedules for construction andoperations.

BCheck if Client/Consultant comments arein conflict with contractual obligations.

C Are Client/Consultant comments of suchnature that they should result in aVariation Proposal?

D Are all Third Party commentsacceptable? If not, is the matter solvedwith the IDC checker and a writtenstatement of the result enclosed to theCheck List?

E Are any other comments than Third Partycomments received at this stage? If yes,are they incorporated?

F Are all Third Party comments properlyincorporated in the document beforeIFC?

G Have any approved changeproposals/variation orders affected thisdrawing/document?

H Are all assumptions and conditionsidentified in Risk Register closed?