28
Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General

Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

  • Upload
    xylia

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. Kristi Shute Indiana Office of Inspector General. Contact Information. Kristi Shute [email protected] (317) 234-3993. Office of Inspector General 315 West Ohio Street Room 104 Indianapolis, IN 46202 www.in.gov/ig. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Kristi ShuteIndiana Office of Inspector General

Page 2: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Kristi [email protected](317) 234-3993

Office of Inspector General315 West Ohio Street

Room 104Indianapolis, IN 46202

www.in.gov/ig

Page 3: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

The Bottom Line:

A public employee’s statement, given during an internal

investigation, cannot be used against him in a later criminal

proceeding.

Page 4: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

The Run-down:

• Police Officers questioned re: fixing traffic tickets

• Told if they refused to answer, faced termination

• When they answered questions, answers were used

against them in criminal proceedings

Page 5: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

No!• The choice between:

– Losing your job OR– Self-incrimination

Constitutes coercion!

Therefore, the answers were not voluntary!

Page 6: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Protection of the Individual under the 14th amendment against coerced statements

prohibits use in subsequent criminal proceedings of statements obtained under threat of removal from office.

Applies to all members of the body politic! i.e. public employees

Page 7: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Public employee

Explicit threat of loss of job

Criminal proceeding

Page 8: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Police Officer appeared under Grand Jury subpoena

Refused “waiver of immunities”

Fired for refusal to waive immunity

Page 9: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Unless given use immunity, cannot be fired for refusal

If use immunity given, may be fired if continued refusal

to answerSpecific, directed questions

Page 10: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Sanitation employees summoned to testify re:

corruption

Fired when refused to relinquish 5th amendment rights

Page 11: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Public employees subject to dismissal if refuse to account for performance of their

public trust, after proper proceedings, which do not involve attempt to coerce relinquishment of constitutional rights.

Because state wished to use answers for criminal proceeding, and not merely

account of public trust, employees could not be dismissed

Page 12: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

NY statutes required public contracts to provide that if contractor refuses to waive immunity or testify concerning his state contracts, existing contracts

may be cancelled & could be disqualified for 5 years

Page 13: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

NY licensed architects refused to sign immunity waivers for grand jury

subpoena

Contracting authorities notified of the conduct

Architects challenged statutes as violating privilege against compelled

self-incrimination

Page 14: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Extends Garrity to contractors

Page 15: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Physician charged with distribution of a controlled substance

Appeared before ALJ to address the suspension of his DEA registration,

testified as an adverse witness.

Registration formally revoked.

Page 16: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Choice: Assert 5th amendment and ALJ could draw negative inference, or testify

and risk incriminating statements

Distinguishable: in Garrity refusal to waive alone resulted in loss of employment

Potential silence only one factor to be considered by ALJ when making

determination

Page 17: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Notice: Not a public employee involved

Page 18: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Fire Dept Employee questioned by federal agency after supervisor told

him they were downstairs

Employee answered questions

Then argued for suppression of answers based on Garrity

Page 19: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Interrogation did not violate Garrity:

Statements not obtained under threat of removal from fire department

position

Neither agents nor Supervisor mentioned to defendant that refusal to answer would result in removal

from employment

Page 20: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Police Officer charged with DUI

Argued to bar admission of breath test results arguing that he provided

sample only under threat of termination

Page 21: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Fifth Amendment applies only to testimonial or communicative

evidence, not physical evidence

Bisard

Page 22: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Fire Dept Capt accused of sexual harassment

2 hearings held resulting in termination

Page 23: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Garrity does not protect public employees from having to

answer questions concerning their conduct at their own

termination hearings in non-criminal investigation

Page 24: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

FSSA Caseworker

D interviewed separately: OIG special agents then agency personnel

Page 25: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Motion to Suppress

“Fruits” inadmissible also

Page 26: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Internal investigation?

Criminal investigation?

Training key

Page 27: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

A public employee’s statement, given during an internal

investigation, cannot be used against him in a later criminal

proceeding.

Keep internal and criminal investigations separate

Page 28: Garrity v. New Jersey HOW TO INVESTIGATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Thank you!Office of Inspector General

315 West Ohio StreetRoom 104

Indianapolis, IN 46202(317) 232-3850www.in.gov/ig