GAO’s EnterprisGAO s EnterprisManageme

Frame

Versio

se Architecturese Architecture nt Maturity

kework

on 2.0

What is the

• Framework developed bi i iorganizations in success

maintaining, and using E• Version 1.0 in 2002• Version 1.1 in 2003Version 1.1 in 2003• Version 2.0 in 2010

e EAMMF?

by the GAO to assist f ll d l isfully developing,

Enterprise Architecture

How the EAMM

• Hierarchical stages of m• Categories of attributes

success in managing any• Elements of EA manage

MF Measures EA

management maturity;that are critical to

y endeavor; and,ement

Simplified Three‐Dimensional Viep ew of EAMMF

Version 2.0

• Expanded from 5 to 7 St• Expanded from 31 to 59

• 33 are new Core Element• 19 Modified from origina• Only 7 are the same

• Provides flexibility to mvarying sets of attributesneed

0 Highlights

tages9 Core Elementstsal Core Elements

measure EA against s based on organizational

EAMMF VersiStage 1:Creating EAawareness 

Stage 2:Building the EA managementfoundation 

Stage 3: Devproducts 

Attribute 1:Demonstratescommitment 

•Adequate resources exist•Committee responsible for directing approving EA

•Written anfor developm

directing, approving EA

Attribute 2:Providescapabilityto meet

•Program office responsible for EA exists•Chief architect exists•EA developed using a 

•Configurati

commitment p g

framework methodology and automated tool

Attribute 3: •Develop both As‐is & To‐b d l

•EA describeb dDemonstrates

satisfaction ofcommitment

be and transition plan•Described in terms of business, performance, data, service, technology•Addresses security

be and trans•Described ibusiness, peservice, tech•Addresses 

Attribute 4:Verifiessatisfactionof commitment

•Plan to develop metrics for measuring progress, quality, compliance, ROI

•Progress mreported

of commitment

ion 1.1 Overviewveloping EA  Stage 4: Completing EA 

products Stage 5: Leveraging the EA to manage change 

d approve policy ment

•Written and approved policy for maintenance

Written and approved policy for IT investment compliance with EA

ion management •IV&V •Process exists to formally manage change•EA is integral component of investment management gprocess

es both As‐is & To‐l

•As‐is & To‐Be described •EA is updatedlsition plan

in terms of erformance, data, hnologysecurity

•Security•CIO approval•Committee or investment review board has approved EA

•IT investments comply with EA•Organization head has approved current EA

measured and  •Quality is measured and reported

•ROI is measured and reported•Compliance is measured and reportedand reported

Seven Stages

• Stage 0: Creating EA Aware• Stage 1: Establishing InstitutStage 1: Establishing Institut

Direction• Stage 2: Creating the Manag

D l t & UDevelopment & Use• Stage 3: Developing Initial E• Stage 4: Completing and UsiStage 4: Completing and Usi

Results• Stage 5: Expanding and Evo

Instit tional TransformationInstitutional Transformation• Stage 6: Continuously Impro

Achieve Corporate Optimizap p

s of Maturity

enesstional Commitment &tional Commitment &

gement Foundation for

EA Versionsing Initial EA for Targeteding Initial EA for Targeted

olving EA and its Use for

oving the EA and Its Use to ation

Stage 0: C t

Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l

Stage 2: Creating the M t

Stage 3DevelopEA VCreat

ing EA Awareness

Institutional Commitment & Direction

Management Foundation for Development

EA Ver

Attribute 1: DemonstratesCommitment

(1) Writtenand approvedpolicy exists(2) Exec

(9) EA budgetary needs are justified and

(19) Obusineand CXare act(2) Exec

committee exists for oversight(3) Proactive

d

justified and funded

are actengagedevelo

steps to reduce barriers to EA

3: ping Initial

i

Stage 4: Completing and U i I iti l EA

Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th EA

Stage 6: ContinuousI trsions Using Initial EA

for Targeted Results

Evolving the EA for Transformation

Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization

Org ess owner XO reps tively

(33) Exec committee has approved initial version of EA

(44) Org head has approved current version of EA

(53) EA is used by executive leadership to inform strategictively

ed in opment

version of EA(34) Key stakeholders have approved subordinate EA(35) EA i

version of EA(45) Org component heads or segment

h

inform strategicplanning and policy formulation

(35) EA is integral to execution of other institutional

owners have approved subordinateEA’s

mgmt disciplines

Stage 0: Creating

Stage 1: Establishing

Stage 2: Creating the Management g

EA Awareness

gInstitutional Commitment & Direction

gFoundation for Development

Att ib t 2 (4) E (10) EAAttribute 2: Providescapability to meet commitment

(4) Exec committee members are trained in EA principles and

(10) EA programoffice exists(11) Key program office leadership

concepts(5) Chiefarchitect exists(6) EA

positions are filled(12) Program office human capital plans

framework adopted

exists(13) EA development & maintenance methodology e odo ogyexists(14) Automated EA tools exist

Stage 3: Developing

Stage 4: Completing

Stage 5: Expanding and

Stage 6: Continuousp g

Initial EA Versions

p gand Using Initial EA for Targeted Results

p gEvolving the EA for Transformation

Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization

(20) H (36) P (46) (54) EAm (20) Human capital plans implemented(21) Program contractor

(36) Program office human capital needs met

(46) Integrated repository tools and common EA

(54) EA human capital improved(55) EA methodologie

support needs met(22) Program staff trained(23) (24)

framework and methodology used across enterprise

s and tools improved(56) EA management processes are

Methodologies & tools exist to determine compliance to

(47) Corporate and subordinateEA offices operated as a

improved and reflect results of external assessments

co p a ce osubord and corporate EA(25) EA risks identified, reported

ope a ed as asingle virtual office that shares resources

reported

Stage 0: C t

Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l

Stage 2: Creating the M t

StageDeveEA VCreat

ing EA Awareness

Institutional Commitment & Direction

Management Foundation for Development

EA V

Attribute 3: Demonstrates satisfaction of commitment

(6) EA purpose is clearly stated.

(15) EA mgmt plan exists(16) Work schedule to d l EA

(26) & Totrans(27)

develop EA exists(17) EA segments, federation

Desctermbusiperfdmembers, and

extendedmembers have been identified and prioritized

datatech(28) fedebeinp beindeve(29) accoframfram(30) per dmet(31) ( )usin

e 3: eloping Initial V i

Stage 4: Completing and U i I iti l EA

Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th EA

Stage 6: ContinuousI tVersions Using Initial EA

for Targeted Results

Evolving the EA for Transformation

Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization

Initial As-s o-Be & sition existsEA

(37) Initial As-is and To-be EA sequencing plan exists(38) I i i l EA

(48) CorporateEA and sequencing plan are

i

(57) EA products are continuously improved and

d dcribed in ms of ness, ormance, 

(38) Initial EA captures business, performance, data, service, 

enterprise wide in scope(49) Aligned with subordinate

updated

a, service, hnologySegment or 

erated EA ng

technology(39) One or more segment and/or federation

architectures(50) All segment or federated EA’s exist and are ng 

elopedDeveloped 

ording to mework

member architectures exist and is being implemented

horizontally and vertically integrated(51) Corporate andmework

Developed defined hodologyDeveloped 

implemented and subordinate EA’s extend to align with external partner EAp

g EA toolspartner EA

Stage 0: Creating EA A

Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l

Stage 2: Creating the M tAwareness Institutional

Commitment & Direction

Management Foundation for Development

Attribute 4: Verifies Satisfaction of C it t

(8) EA performance and accountability f k i

(18) Program office readiness is measured and

t dCommitment framework isestablished

reported

Stage 3: Developing I iti l EA

Stage 4: Completing

d U i

Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th

Stage 6: ContinuousI tInitial EA

Versionsand Using Initial EA for Targeted Results

Evolving the EA for Transformation

Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization

(32) Architecture development progress is

d d

(40) EA quality is measured and reported(41) EA

(52) EA products and management processes are

bj t t

(58) EA quality and results and measurement

th dmeasured and reported

(41) EA results and outcomes are measured and reported

subject to independent assessment

methods are continuously improved(59) EA continuous

(42) Investment compliance with corporate and

improvement efforts reflect the result of external assessmentsp

subordinate EA’s is measured and reported(43)(43)Subordinate EA alignment with corporate EA is measuredis measured and reported

Different ApproacDifferent ApproacArchite

• Federated• Segmented• Service-OrientedService Oriented• Extended

ches to Structuringches to Structuring ectures

Other Ways of

• Version 2.0 allows for a “fit th EAMMF lfit the EAMMF core elemorganization based on diff

• Critical Success AttributeVersion 1.1):– Demonstrates Commitmen– Provides capability to mee– Demonstrates satisfaction – Verifies satisfaction of com

Measuring EA

“modular” representation: t t b t fitments to best fit your

fferent slices of attributeses (Carried over from

ntet commitmentof commitment

mmitment

Version 2.0

• Functional Area ReprelElements:

– Governance– Content– Use– Measurement

0 Attributes

esentation of Core

Version 2 0Version 2.0

• OMB Capability Area lElements:

– Completion– Use– Results

0 Attributes0 Attributes

Representation of Core

Version 2 0Version 2.0

• EA Enabler Represent– Leadership– People– Processes– Tools

0 Attributes0 Attributes

tation of Core Elements:

Takea

• Version 2.0 provides a mh iapproach to measuring E

direction for more succe• More involvement with

engaging stakeholdersg g g• More emphasis on use o• Emphasis on flexibility• Emphasis on flexibility• Importance of Strategy!

aways

more comprehensive A d h idEA, and as such provides

essful implementation senior executives and

of EA

More Inf

• Full EAMMF Version 2GAO’ b iGAO’s website:

• http://www.gao.gov/new• Source: All quoted mate

copied from or derived fcopied from or derived fEAMMF.

formation

2.0 available from the

w.items/d10846g.pdferials and graphics are from GAO report onfrom GAO report on