Upload
doanthuy
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GAO’s EnterprisGAO s EnterprisManageme
Frame
Versio
se Architecturese Architecture nt Maturity
kework
on 2.0
What is the
• Framework developed bi i iorganizations in success
maintaining, and using E• Version 1.0 in 2002• Version 1.1 in 2003Version 1.1 in 2003• Version 2.0 in 2010
e EAMMF?
by the GAO to assist f ll d l isfully developing,
Enterprise Architecture
How the EAMM
• Hierarchical stages of m• Categories of attributes
success in managing any• Elements of EA manage
MF Measures EA
management maturity;that are critical to
y endeavor; and,ement
Version 2.0
• Expanded from 5 to 7 St• Expanded from 31 to 59
• 33 are new Core Element• 19 Modified from origina• Only 7 are the same
• Provides flexibility to mvarying sets of attributesneed
0 Highlights
tages9 Core Elementstsal Core Elements
measure EA against s based on organizational
EAMMF VersiStage 1:Creating EAawareness
Stage 2:Building the EA managementfoundation
Stage 3: Devproducts
Attribute 1:Demonstratescommitment
•Adequate resources exist•Committee responsible for directing approving EA
•Written anfor developm
directing, approving EA
Attribute 2:Providescapabilityto meet
•Program office responsible for EA exists•Chief architect exists•EA developed using a
•Configurati
commitment p g
framework methodology and automated tool
Attribute 3: •Develop both As‐is & To‐b d l
•EA describeb dDemonstrates
satisfaction ofcommitment
be and transition plan•Described in terms of business, performance, data, service, technology•Addresses security
be and trans•Described ibusiness, peservice, tech•Addresses
Attribute 4:Verifiessatisfactionof commitment
•Plan to develop metrics for measuring progress, quality, compliance, ROI
•Progress mreported
of commitment
ion 1.1 Overviewveloping EA Stage 4: Completing EA
products Stage 5: Leveraging the EA to manage change
d approve policy ment
•Written and approved policy for maintenance
Written and approved policy for IT investment compliance with EA
ion management •IV&V •Process exists to formally manage change•EA is integral component of investment management gprocess
es both As‐is & To‐l
•As‐is & To‐Be described •EA is updatedlsition plan
in terms of erformance, data, hnologysecurity
•Security•CIO approval•Committee or investment review board has approved EA
•IT investments comply with EA•Organization head has approved current EA
measured and •Quality is measured and reported
•ROI is measured and reported•Compliance is measured and reportedand reported
Seven Stages
• Stage 0: Creating EA Aware• Stage 1: Establishing InstitutStage 1: Establishing Institut
Direction• Stage 2: Creating the Manag
D l t & UDevelopment & Use• Stage 3: Developing Initial E• Stage 4: Completing and UsiStage 4: Completing and Usi
Results• Stage 5: Expanding and Evo
Instit tional TransformationInstitutional Transformation• Stage 6: Continuously Impro
Achieve Corporate Optimizap p
s of Maturity
enesstional Commitment &tional Commitment &
gement Foundation for
EA Versionsing Initial EA for Targeteding Initial EA for Targeted
olving EA and its Use for
oving the EA and Its Use to ation
Stage 0: C t
Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l
Stage 2: Creating the M t
Stage 3DevelopEA VCreat
ing EA Awareness
Institutional Commitment & Direction
Management Foundation for Development
EA Ver
Attribute 1: DemonstratesCommitment
(1) Writtenand approvedpolicy exists(2) Exec
(9) EA budgetary needs are justified and
(19) Obusineand CXare act(2) Exec
committee exists for oversight(3) Proactive
d
justified and funded
are actengagedevelo
steps to reduce barriers to EA
3: ping Initial
i
Stage 4: Completing and U i I iti l EA
Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th EA
Stage 6: ContinuousI trsions Using Initial EA
for Targeted Results
Evolving the EA for Transformation
Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization
Org ess owner XO reps tively
(33) Exec committee has approved initial version of EA
(44) Org head has approved current version of EA
(53) EA is used by executive leadership to inform strategictively
ed in opment
version of EA(34) Key stakeholders have approved subordinate EA(35) EA i
version of EA(45) Org component heads or segment
h
inform strategicplanning and policy formulation
(35) EA is integral to execution of other institutional
owners have approved subordinateEA’s
mgmt disciplines
Stage 0: Creating
Stage 1: Establishing
Stage 2: Creating the Management g
EA Awareness
gInstitutional Commitment & Direction
gFoundation for Development
Att ib t 2 (4) E (10) EAAttribute 2: Providescapability to meet commitment
(4) Exec committee members are trained in EA principles and
(10) EA programoffice exists(11) Key program office leadership
concepts(5) Chiefarchitect exists(6) EA
positions are filled(12) Program office human capital plans
framework adopted
exists(13) EA development & maintenance methodology e odo ogyexists(14) Automated EA tools exist
Stage 3: Developing
Stage 4: Completing
Stage 5: Expanding and
Stage 6: Continuousp g
Initial EA Versions
p gand Using Initial EA for Targeted Results
p gEvolving the EA for Transformation
Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization
(20) H (36) P (46) (54) EAm (20) Human capital plans implemented(21) Program contractor
(36) Program office human capital needs met
(46) Integrated repository tools and common EA
(54) EA human capital improved(55) EA methodologie
support needs met(22) Program staff trained(23) (24)
framework and methodology used across enterprise
s and tools improved(56) EA management processes are
Methodologies & tools exist to determine compliance to
(47) Corporate and subordinateEA offices operated as a
improved and reflect results of external assessments
co p a ce osubord and corporate EA(25) EA risks identified, reported
ope a ed as asingle virtual office that shares resources
reported
Stage 0: C t
Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l
Stage 2: Creating the M t
StageDeveEA VCreat
ing EA Awareness
Institutional Commitment & Direction
Management Foundation for Development
EA V
Attribute 3: Demonstrates satisfaction of commitment
(6) EA purpose is clearly stated.
(15) EA mgmt plan exists(16) Work schedule to d l EA
(26) & Totrans(27)
develop EA exists(17) EA segments, federation
Desctermbusiperfdmembers, and
extendedmembers have been identified and prioritized
datatech(28) fedebeinp beindeve(29) accoframfram(30) per dmet(31) ( )usin
e 3: eloping Initial V i
Stage 4: Completing and U i I iti l EA
Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th EA
Stage 6: ContinuousI tVersions Using Initial EA
for Targeted Results
Evolving the EA for Transformation
Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization
Initial As-s o-Be & sition existsEA
(37) Initial As-is and To-be EA sequencing plan exists(38) I i i l EA
(48) CorporateEA and sequencing plan are
i
(57) EA products are continuously improved and
d dcribed in ms of ness, ormance,
(38) Initial EA captures business, performance, data, service,
enterprise wide in scope(49) Aligned with subordinate
updated
a, service, hnologySegment or
erated EA ng
technology(39) One or more segment and/or federation
architectures(50) All segment or federated EA’s exist and are ng
elopedDeveloped
ording to mework
member architectures exist and is being implemented
horizontally and vertically integrated(51) Corporate andmework
Developed defined hodologyDeveloped
implemented and subordinate EA’s extend to align with external partner EAp
g EA toolspartner EA
Stage 0: Creating EA A
Stage 1: Establishing I tit ti l
Stage 2: Creating the M tAwareness Institutional
Commitment & Direction
Management Foundation for Development
Attribute 4: Verifies Satisfaction of C it t
(8) EA performance and accountability f k i
(18) Program office readiness is measured and
t dCommitment framework isestablished
reported
Stage 3: Developing I iti l EA
Stage 4: Completing
d U i
Stage 5: Expanding and E l i th
Stage 6: ContinuousI tInitial EA
Versionsand Using Initial EA for Targeted Results
Evolving the EA for Transformation
Improvement and Its to Achieve Optimization
(32) Architecture development progress is
d d
(40) EA quality is measured and reported(41) EA
(52) EA products and management processes are
bj t t
(58) EA quality and results and measurement
th dmeasured and reported
(41) EA results and outcomes are measured and reported
subject to independent assessment
methods are continuously improved(59) EA continuous
(42) Investment compliance with corporate and
improvement efforts reflect the result of external assessmentsp
subordinate EA’s is measured and reported(43)(43)Subordinate EA alignment with corporate EA is measuredis measured and reported
Different ApproacDifferent ApproacArchite
• Federated• Segmented• Service-OrientedService Oriented• Extended
ches to Structuringches to Structuring ectures
Other Ways of
• Version 2.0 allows for a “fit th EAMMF lfit the EAMMF core elemorganization based on diff
• Critical Success AttributeVersion 1.1):– Demonstrates Commitmen– Provides capability to mee– Demonstrates satisfaction – Verifies satisfaction of com
Measuring EA
“modular” representation: t t b t fitments to best fit your
fferent slices of attributeses (Carried over from
ntet commitmentof commitment
mmitment
Version 2.0
• Functional Area ReprelElements:
– Governance– Content– Use– Measurement
0 Attributes
esentation of Core
Version 2 0Version 2.0
• OMB Capability Area lElements:
– Completion– Use– Results
0 Attributes0 Attributes
Representation of Core
Version 2 0Version 2.0
• EA Enabler Represent– Leadership– People– Processes– Tools
0 Attributes0 Attributes
tation of Core Elements:
Takea
• Version 2.0 provides a mh iapproach to measuring E
direction for more succe• More involvement with
engaging stakeholdersg g g• More emphasis on use o• Emphasis on flexibility• Emphasis on flexibility• Importance of Strategy!
aways
more comprehensive A d h idEA, and as such provides
essful implementation senior executives and
of EA