Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

Galactic Glow, Thought to Be Dark Matter, NowHints at Hidden PulsarsA number of high-energy anomalies raised hopes that astrophysicists had seen their first directglimpses of dark matter. New studies suggest a different source may be responsible.

By Katia Moskvitch

Quanta Magazine; source: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SAO/NOAO

An artist’s view of a pulsar near the center of the Messier 82 galaxy.

In 2009, Dan Hooper and his colleagues found a glow coming from the center of our galaxy that noone had ever noticed before. After analyzing publicly available data from the Fermi Gamma RaySpace Telescope, a satellite launched a year earlier, the team concluded that the center of the MilkyWay was radiating more gamma rays than astrophysicists could account for.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

The finding was so unexpected that, at the time, few believed that it was real. It didn’t help thatHooper wasn’t a member of the Fermi collaboration, but rather an outsider picking over the datathat the Fermi team made public. One of the scientists working on Fermi called his work“amateurish,” arguing that Hooper simply didn’t know how to properly interpret the data.

Yet as time wore on, astrophysicists began to realize that there’s a lot more high-energy radiationstreaming through the galaxy than they could explain. Just a year before Hooper started analyzingFermi data, a gamma-ray detector in New Mexico called Milagro had found an abundance of super-energetic gamma rays that appeared to come from all across the galactic plane. And in 2014, theAlpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS), an experiment on the International Space Station, found moreantimatter streaming through the galaxy than could be accounted for, confirming earlierobservations by satellite and balloon experiments.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

Fermilab

Dan Hooper, a physicist at the University of Chicago and Fermilab, uncovered evidence of extra gamma rayscoming from the galactic center.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

These three anomalies — if real — showed that something was going on in the universe that wedidn’t know about. A number of astrophysicists, including Hooper, began to argue that two of thesemysterious signals were an astrophysical echo of dark matter, the profoundly mysterious substancethought to make up about a quarter of the universe.

This year, almost a decade after the launch of the Fermi telescope, researchers have nearly arrivedat a consensus. First, pretty much all astrophysicists now agree that the center of our Milky Wayproduces much more gamma radiation than our models of known gamma-ray sources suggest, saidLuigi Tibaldo, an astrophysicist at Stanford University and member of the Fermi collaboration, thusvalidating Hooper’s once-“amateurish” claims.

Second, all that extra radiation is probably not due to dark matter. A number of recent studies haveconvinced many researchers that pulsars — rapidly spinning neutron stars — can explain all threemysteries.

The only problem is that no one seems to be able to find them.

Dark Matter DaysThe center of the galaxy is a crowded place, dense with stars, dust and — presumably — darkmatter. Astrophysicists have long believed that dark matter is probably made out of particles thatdon’t readily interact with ordinary matter — so-called “weakly interacting massive particles,” orWIMPs. Occasionally these WIMPs might collide with one another. When they do, they couldproduce gamma rays. Perhaps that’s just what’s going on in the galactic center, Hooper suggestedback in 2009.

The theory dovetailed with another idea that Hooper had put forward just a year earlier. In 2008, heand three co-authors published a paper arguing that collisions of neutralinos — a type of WIMP —generated showers of exotic particles that then decayed into elementary particles. The processwould explain the anomalously high levels of positrons (the antimatter counterpart of electrons)found earlier by a space-based experiment called Pamela.

In this case, Hooper was in good company. Since Pamela’s first results, “without exaggeration”around 1,000 papers have tried to explain the positron excess mystery, said Tim Linden, anastrophysicist at Ohio State University. The majority of these papers favored the dark-matterinterpretation. In 2014, the Pamela results were buttressed by data coming from the AMS.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

NASA

The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, seen here in the foreground of the International Space Station, could eventuallysettle the dark matter-vs.-pulsars debate.

Yet other scientists quickly started to poke holes in both of these dark-matter–based explanations. Inthe case of the galactic center, WIMP collisions should create a smooth, hazy glow of gamma rays,like a floodlight seen through thick fog. When astrophysicists examined the gamma-ray glow indetail, however, they found a pointillist patchwork of light. It appeared as though the gamma rayswere coming from many individual point sources.

And if WIMPs were producing all those positrons, they should also be creating a lot of gamma rays.Yet when astronomers look out at nearby dwarf galaxies — thought to be home to a huge amount ofdark matter — the gamma rays don’t appear.

The tension in these dark-matter models has forced astrophysicists to consider some moreastrophysically prosaic options.

The Rise of PulsarsEven though most scientists are fairly certain that dark matter exists (even if we cannot directlyobserve it), the models are still considered exotic. What’s much less exotic are astrophysical sourcesof radiation that we can actually detect with our telescopes. So as the data began to undermine thecase for dark matter, many researchers, including Hooper, began to contemplate a much moremundane explanation: pulsars.

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

Katherine Taylor for Quanta Magazine

Tracy Slatyer, a physicist at MIT, found that pulsars could explain the gamma-ray glow coming from the galacticcenter.

Pulsars are ultra-dense, rapidly rotating objects — neutron stars, the dead cores of massive starsthat have gone supernova. They emit jets of radiation that spin around with the pulsar like the beamfrom a lighthouse. As this beam crosses Earth, our telescopes register a flash of energy.

In 2015, two groups — one led by Christoph Weniger, an astrophysicist at the University ofAmsterdam, and the other by Tracy Slatyer, a theoretical physicist at the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology — separately presented evidence that gave the pulsar theory a major boost. Each teamused slightly different methods, but essentially they both divided the region of the sky covering thegalactic center into numerous pixels. They then counted the number of fluctuations in each pixel —watching, essentially, for lighthouse beams to swing across the face of Earth. The researchersdiscovered big differences between pixels — hot and cold patches in the sky, which are much easierto explain if one assumes that the signal comes from different point sources. “This is what you wouldexpect from pulsars, because there could be brighter pulsars, or more pulsars, at some sky locationscompared to others,” said Linden.

Most astrophysicists now think that the strange abundance of positrons in the galaxy may also bedue to pulsars. Pulsars generate huge magnetic fields that spin along with the rest of the object. Aspinning magnetic field will generate an electric field, and this electric field pulls electrons from thesurface of the pulsar and accelerates them rapidly. As the electrons curve through the magneticfields, the electrons will emit high-energy gamma rays. Some of this radiation is energetic enough to

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

spontaneously morph into pairs of electrons and positrons that then escape from the pulsar’s strongmagnetic grasp.

There are a lot of steps in this process, and a lot of uncertainty. Specifically, researchers want toknow how much of the pulsar’s energy goes into making these electron-positron pairs. Is it a fractionof a percentage point? Or a significant total, something like 20 or even 40 percent of the pulsar’senergy? If the latter, pulsars might be making enough positrons to explain the antimatter excess.

Researchers had to find a way to measure the number of electrons and positrons coming out ofpulsars. Unfortunately, this is an extremely difficult task. Electrons and positrons, being chargedparticles, will loop and twist their way through the galaxy. If you detect one from Earth, it’s hard toknow where it came from.

Jordana Goodman

The High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Gamma-Ray Observatory (HAWC) detects high-energy gamma rays and cosmicrays.

Gamma rays, on the other hand, stick to a straight path. With this in mind, researchers working withthe High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Gamma-Ray Observatory (HAWC) in Mexico have recently madedetailed studies of two relatively bright and relatively nearby pulsars, Geminga and Monogem. Theyexamined not just the gamma rays coming from the pulsar itself, but also the super-energeticgamma rays (1,000 times more energetic than the excess streaming from the galactic center) thatappeared as a relatively broad halo around the pulsars. Throughout this halo, high-energy electronscoming from the pulsar collided with low-energy photons from ambient starlight. The collisionstransferred huge amounts of energy to the poky photons, like a sledgehammer smashing golf balls

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

into orbit.

Earlier this year, a team that included Hooper and Linden published a study that compared thebrightness of the pulsars with the brightness of their halos. They concluded that 8 to 27 percent ofGeminga’s energy had to be converted to electrons and positrons, said Linden. For Monogem, it wastwice as much. “This means that pulsars produce a tremendous population of electrons andpositrons within our galaxy,” said Linden.

Slatyer said the research is “the first time we’ve really had any handle on the spectrum of high-energy positrons produced by pulsars, so this is a big step forward.”

The work also helps to explain the strange excess of very-high-energy gamma rays that were found adecade ago by the Milagro detector in New Mexico. The radiation could be coming from pulsar-generated electrons and positrons accelerating ambient starlight.

Dark Matter’s RevengeOne hurdle remains: finding enough pulsars to account for all the mysterious emission. “We shouldsee about 50 [bright] pulsars in the galactic center to produce the excess,” said Linden. “Insteadwe’ve only found a handful.” Similarly, we don’t yet know of enough pulsars in the rest of the galaxyto explain away the positron excess or the abundance of ultra-high-energy gamma rays found byMilagro and HAWC.

The issue doesn’t bother pulsar proponents that much, though. They hope that in the near future anew generation of radio telescopes — such as MeerKAT in South Africa and its planned successor,the Square Kilometer Array in South Africa and Australia — will find the so far invisible radiosources in our galaxy.

So is the dark matter-vs.-pulsars debate settled? For positrons, it appears to be so. While many moreresearchers used to favor the dark matter interpretation originally, most now lean towards pulsars.

And in the galactic center, pulsars are “the Occam’s razor candidate,” said Slatyer. “You couldexplain the data just as well with a dark-matter-annihilation scenario, but we knew pulsars werethere and we don’t know if dark matter annihilates, so you could consider the pulsar scenario to besimpler.”

According to Slatyer, the dark-matter explanation for the galactic center could yet make acomeback, and there is indeed another way to test the dark-matter hypothesis. When cosmic raysinteract with interstellar material, and — in theory — during dark-matter annihilations, they produceantiprotons, the antiparticle twin of a proton. Pulsars cannot produce antiprotons. If researcherswere to find more antiprotons than could be accounted for by cosmic rays, the discovery would boostthe dark-matter scenario. This is exactly what preliminary results from AMS have shown: a possibleexcess of antiprotons that may be consistent with annihilating dark-matter particles. AMS scientistsaren’t making any conclusions about the source of the antiprotons, but two papers came out thisyear arguing that dark matter could be behind the antiproton excess.

For Linden, the pulsar confirmation would mean even more. For decades, he said, when we havethought about the energetics of cosmic rays in our universe, we’ve always thought aboutsupernovas, producing protons that then generate all of the cosmic rays detected. “We have had thisreally pretty picture where supernovas produce everything,” said Linden. “Everything links togetherand looks perfect.”

Quanta Magazine

https://www.quantamagazine.org/galactic-glow-thought-to-be-dark-matter-now-points-to-hidden-pulsars-20171114/ November 14, 2017

But in setting up that model, the energetics from pulsars are generally neglected, he added —despite pulsars’ being among the highest-energy objects in space. “So if this new picture holds up,and pulsars produce these excesses, then it really changes our interpretation of the source of mostof the very energetic radiation in galaxies, and maybe throughout the universe,” said Linden.

It might be a case of Pulsars: 3, Dark Matter: 0, at least for now. “But I would be lying if I said Ididn’t want these signals to turn out to be dark matter,” said Linden. “That would be so, so muchmore exciting.”

This article was reprinted on Wired.com.