Upload
vuphuc
View
228
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL
FUNDAMENTALS OF LIQUID FILTRATION & FILTER TESTING
Christophe PEUCHOT, CEO
Jerry LYNCH, President
International Filter
Testing
Services Inc
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL2
CONTENT
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE / NEED
THEORIES OF LIQUID FILTRATION
CHARACTERIZATION OF PARTICLES/SUSPENSIONS
CHARACTERIZATION OF POROUS MEDIA/FILTERS
1
2
3
4
5
CONCLUSION6
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL3
•
SCOPE
SOLID-LIQUID
MIXTURES
CLARIFIED LIQUIDS
RECOVERED SOLIDS
SOLID-LIQUID SEPARATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL4
CLARIFICATION OF A LIQUID
Swimming
pool water
Drinking
waterInjectable Solutes
Wastewater Food oil
Sugar
Milk
Machining
fluid
Pharmaceutical proteins
EXPRESSION OF THE NEED
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL5
EXPRESSION OF THE NEED
RECOVERY / DEHYDRATION / UP GRADING OF SOLIDS
CoalSugar
Iron
ore
Phosphate
Grapes
wort
Waste
water sludge
Carbonate
Uranium ore
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL6
EXISTING SOLUTIONS
SOLID-LIQUID SEPARATION TECHNIQUES & PROCESSES:
•
A broad
family
of available
technologies
•
2 Principles
: Difference
of «density»
+ Flow through
porous
media-
Sedimentation, Centrifugation, Cycloning, Flottation, Magnetic
-
Sieving, Filtration, Centrifuge filtration, Membrane Separations
•
Hundreds
of machines and products
Listed
in IFTS’
TECHNOTHEQUE (Technical
Library)
•
Selection
optimisation : an expert task
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL7
FILTRATION / CLARIFICATION OF LIQUIDS
Diversity
of liquids, applications, aims
and requirements
Coarse
engine
lube
oil
filter
→
injectable solute
sterilizing
membrane filter
Broad variety
of filters
and filtering
media
Often
one product
= several
applications
Many
suppliers, open market, strong
competition
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL8
FILTRATION / CLARIFICATION OF LIQUIDS
Behaviour
directly
linked
to application: products
and conditions
Choice
by steps
= selection
on brochure claims, lab/pilot trials, final validation, purchase
Need
for clear
statements
of performance
Test methods
and equipments
Standardization
= agreement between
parties suppliers
/ end users
/ testing
organisations
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL9
AVAILABLE FILTRATION TECHNIQUES
Deep
bed
Belt
Precoat
Cartridge
Disc
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL10
FILTERING MEDIA FOR LIQUID CLARIFICATION
GRANULAR
UNIT GRAINS, POWDERS AND FIBERS
FOR DEEP BEDS (thickness
> 30 cm)
-
SAND, ANTHRACITE, CHARCOAL, GRENAT,
-
IN OPEN OR CLOSED FILTERS
FOR PRECOAT FILTERS (filter
aids)
-
DIATOMITES, PERLITES, CELLULOSE FIBERS, WOOD FLOUR,
-
ROTATING DRUMS, FRAME, DISCS, CANDLE FILTERS
A DISCONTINUOUS PROCESS
-
BACKWASHING
-
DISPOSAL OF CLOGGED MEDIA
MAINLY USED ON HIGH FLOWRATE FILTERS FOR THE CLARIFICATION OF LIQUIDS
Sand
Diatoms
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL11
FILTERING MEDIA FOR LIQUID CLARIFICATION
Wire
mesh
Cellulose nitrate
membrane
Polycarbonate membrane
Glass micro fibers
Cellulose paper
Syntheticnonwoven
STRUCTURED (MADE)
WOVEN FABRICS
-
WIRE (metallic) or THREAD (synthetic)
NON WOVENS AND «
PAPERS
»
-
FIBERS OF CELLULOSE, GLASS-
POLYMERIC (melt
blown, spun
bonded,…)
STACKS OF RINGS or DISCS
-
BEAD or FIBERS-
METAL, PLASTIC, CERAMIC
MEMBRANES
-
CERAMIC-
POLYMERIC
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL12
NON WOVEN AND SINTERED FILTERING MEDIA
STRUCTURE MATERIALS BINDING TECHNIQUE SHAPE
PAPERS
(fibers)
CELLULOSE
GLASS MICROFIBERS
COTTON
RESINSPLEATED
ROLLED
NON WOVEN
SYNTHETIC FIBERS
Polypropylene, polyamide,
Polyethylene, polyester, PTFE, PVC, …
THERMOFUSING
RESINS
SINTERING
INTERLACING
PLEATED
ROLLED
METALLIC FIBERSSINTERING
INTERLACING
WOUND
ROLLED
SINTERED WIRESYNTHETIC
METALLIC-
ROLLED
WOUND
SINTERED BEADS
METTALIC
PLASTIC
CERAMIC
SINTERINGTUBES
PLATES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL13
MEMBRANES
Organic Mineral
Cellulose ester/acetate/nitrate, Polysulfone, acrylonitrile, PFE,
polyamide, PVDF, polycarbonate, nylon
Ceramic, carbide, aluminate,
zirconium or titanium
oxyde
1 –
DEFINITION
A thin
(e < 300 µm), microporous
(0.05 < MPS < 10 µm) and homogenious
structure which
can
be
supported
2 -
NATURE
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL14
3 -
MANUFACTURING
POLYMERISATION / EVAPORATION
IRRADIATION / SELECTIVE DISSOLUTION
WARM STRETCHING
DEPOSITION / COOKING
MEMBRANES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL15
MEMBRANES
4 -
IMPLEMENTATION
PLEATED CARTRIDGES
MONO or MULTICHANNEL TUBES
DISC STACKS
SPIRAL MODULES
HOLLOW FIBRES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL16
TECHNOLOGY OF FILTERING CARTRIDGES
TYPESWOUND, AGGLOMERATED
PLEATED, ROLLED, DISCS, CAPSULES
CONSTITUTION
SUPPORT AND INTERFACES
. Central tube (perforated)
. CAGE = external
perforated
tube or grid
. END CAPS
. SEALS (flat, O-ring), …)
FILTERING MEDIA –pleated, stacked
or rollet)
. AT LEAST TWO LAYERS
protection
Prefilter
(s)
Filtering
media
Drainage
Support
. STICKED OR WELDED TO END CAPS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL17
TECHNOLOGY OF CARTRIDGE FILTERS
TYPES-
MONO or MULTICARTRIDGES
Up to 20 housing
-
VARIOUS MATERIALS
Stainless
steel, aluminium, steel, polycarbonate,
PVDF, PTFE, PVC, screwable, clampsable, …
ACCESSORIES (and functions)-
EVENT AND FLUSHING OUT
-
CLOGGING INDICATOR
Mechanical, electrical, …
-
BYPASS VALVE
-
ANTIDRAIN VALVE
-
SEALS (O-RING, FLAT, …)
-
SPRINGS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL18
APPLICATIONS OF CARTRIDGE FILTERS
APPLICATION AIMS RATING SUITED FILTERS
PREFILTRATION
COARSE FILTRATION (SIEVING)
PROTECTION OF A FINER FILTER
«
CLARIFICATION
»
OF VISQUOUS FLUIDS (varnish, syrups, cosmetics, …)
PROTECTION OF A MOVING PART (pump, valve, …)
REDUCTION OF SOLID CONTENT
S >
10 µm
WOUND
AGGLOMERATED
PLEATED NON WOVEN (one layer)
ROLLED TABLECLOTH
PLEATED WIRE MESH
FILTRATION
CLARIFICATION (less
turbide) (beverage, perfumes, solvents, …)
TROUBLE REDUCTION (water, varnish, …)
REDUCTION OF PARTICULATE CONTENT (cleanliness
classes : hydraulics, injectable solutes, …)
PROTECTION OF MOVING PARTS
PREFILTRATION FOR STERILISING FILTERS
0.5<S<10 µm
PLEATED (several
layers)
ROLLED TABLECLOTH
DISCS or LENS
CAPSULES
STERILISATION
REDUCTION OF COLLOIDS CONTENTS
RETENTION PYROGENES, BACTERIA AND VIRUSES
COLD STERILISATION
ULTRAPURE FLUIDS (microelectronics)
S < 0.5 µm
PLEATED CARTRIDGES
CAPSULES
DISCS or LENS
BEVERAGE
NUCLEAR
MICROELECTRONICS AEROSPACE
HEALTHCARE
CHEMISTRY
FLUID POWER
AUTOMOBILE
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL19
THEORIES OF LIQUID FILTRATION : FLOW
Flow of liquid through porous media
•
Darcy law
•
Bo
= permeability (mm2
or Darcy)
P = f (media + fluid)
0BAzQP
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL20
THEORIES OF FILTRATION : EFFICIENCY
Filtration efficiency = capture mechanisms
•
Mechanical sieving ↔ particle size
•
Electrostatic attraction
•
Approach to the media surface
Sedimentation –
Hydrodynamics –
Inertia –
Diffusion
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL21
THEORIES OF FILTRATION : CLOGGING
Filtering media clogging
d2t/dV2
= (dt/dV)n
Pore Total Clogging
Pore Progressive Clogging
Pore Partial Clogging
Cake Filtration
n=2 n=1
n=3/2 n=0
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL22
FILTERING MEDIA CLOGGING
LAWS OF FILTRATION
0
kV0
2
00
2/120
0
02
0kt0
00
0
kt0
n
q1
q1kVeqq
2kV1qqqqkV)V(fq
)tkq1(qq
q1
q1kt
1V2k
qqeqq)t(fq
q1V
2k
Vt)ktq1ln(kV
q1t
2k
Vt)e1(qV)t(fV
0n1n23n2n
dVdtk
²dVt²d
gingllogcginglogcginglogcCakePartialogressivePrTotalFunction
essurePrttanConsLaws1982HERMIA1936BREDEEHERMANS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL23
THEORY OF CAKE FILTRATION
Constant Pressure
Constant Flow Rate
Centrifuge Filtration
PRV
Pvt s
22
QRtQP s2
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3V (m3) x 104
t/V (s
.m-3) x
10-7
ΔP2Aωαμ
2cPA
R m
rf
rc ro
Pc
HQf
)²r²r(²21P f0l
])rRs()
rr
(Ln)1([
PH2Q
0c
0s
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL24
CHARACTERIZATION OF PARTICLES/SUSPENSIONS
INTRINSIC
Density, Particle Size Distribution, Concentration, Turbidity,
Viscosity, Surface Tension, Specific area, Surface Charge
BEHAVIORAL
Filterability, Compressibility, Settling rate, Specific resistance,
Rheology, CST, …
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL25
INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS
Viscosity
Surface Tension
Contact Angle
dCosP /4
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL26
INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS
Concentration
Turbidity
Surface Charge
NTU
mg/L
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL27
INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICLES
PARTICLE SIZE
1 dimension
?
2 dimensions
r
a
(r,l)As many dimensions as possible directions of measurement → Equivalent diameter
= “Diameter of the sphere with the same behaviour
with the property chosen”
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL28
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
EQUIVALENT DIAMETERS
Optical :
Longest
dimension by microscopy
Projected
area by microscopy
and light extinction
Diffraction
Scattering
Physical
:
Sieving
Settling
velocity
Displaced
volume by electrozone
REPORT OF RESULTS
By mass, volume or number
Cumulative (d>x) or differential
(x1 < d < x2)
Tables, figures and codes
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL29
PARTICLE COUNTING
MICROSCOPY
Transmitted or incident light at appropriate level
Magnification = f(sizes of interest) : 5 to 500 x
Membrane preparation (individuel objects)
Manual setting of grey level
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL30
LIGHT EXTINCTION
DDéémonstrationmonstration auau LaboratoireLaboratoire
V
Signal (mV) =
particle projected surface area
Particle=
Shadow on photodetector
Light extinction
Above
1µm, up to 40 mg/L ISO MTD, Fuels, Drinking
water, Hydraulic
fluids, Pharmaceutics
PARTICLE COUNTING
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL31
PARTICLE COUNTING
LIGHT SCATTERING
Below
3 µm, very
low
concentration (<100 part/mL)
Microelectronics, microfilter
testing
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL32
PARTICLE COUNTING
ELECTROSENSING ZONE (COULTER)
(volume)
Variation of electrical
conductivity
of sensing
volume
Aqueous
liquids
or organic
ones
with
salts
Size ranges : 0.5 to 500 µm and more (sedimentation!)
Pharmaceuticals, chemicals, bioproducts,
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL33
PARTICLE COUNTING / SIZING
Volume of fluid
analysed
(N = V x C)
Bottle
sampler = controled
volume
Online sampler = controled
(flow rate + time) or volume
Coïncidence error
= several
particles
in the sensing
zone at
the
same
time
Noise level
= minimum electronic
(mV) tension below
which
particles
are not detected
Resolution
= ability
to differentiate
particles
with
very
close sizes
FACTORS OF INFLUENCE
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL34
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Particle
Size analysis by laser diffraction (NF X 11-666)
Ref. Imphy Loire - Pas d'ultrason - N° IFTS : 3814
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Diametres (µm)
Pass
ant c
umul
é en
%
Ref. Imphy Loire - Pas d'ultrason - N° IFTS : 3814
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
0,04 0,5 1,1 2 5 8,5 14 20 38 63 95 140 190 400 1000 1600 2200
Diametres (µm)
Dis
trib
utio
n re
lativ
e en
%
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL35
PARTICLE COUNTING/SIZING
Samples
representativity
: mix, disperse, degas
Particle
settling
Overlimit
concentration
Microbubbles
Immiscible or different
refractive
index liquids
Dilution ratio
Viscosity
and flow changes
Electrical
parasites
Mechanical
vibrations
SOURCES OF ERROS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL36
COUNTING/SIZING INSTRUMENTS
COMMON REQUIREMENTS = SIZE CALIBRATION
CERTIFIED MONOSIZED SPHERES TRACEABLE TO REFERENCE TECHNIQUES : Microscopy
calibrated
with
certified
graticules
CERTIFIED POLYDISPERSED SUSPENSIONS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL37
Field contamination monitor (FCM)
PORTABLE and ONLINE SYSTEMS
Doc. PARKER
Hydraulic
systems: aerospace, petroleum, earth
moving, mining, paper
millsFuels, lubricants
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION/COUNTS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL38
COUNTING/SIZING INSTRUMENTS
Count and / or size
Type of distribution : number, mass, volume
Information looked
for (filtered
liquid, pulp
to settle, floculated
particles)
Sample
concentration, volume, flowrate,
Batch / On line –
Laboratory
/ Process
Environment
/ Operation
conditions
Accuracy
required
CRITERIA OF CHOICE
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL39
Factors
of influence
Volume of fluid
analysed
(N = V x C)
Bottle
sampler = controled
volume
Online sampler = controled
(flow rate + time) or volume
Coïncidence error
= several
particles
in the sensing
zone at
the same
time
Noise level
= minimum electronic
(mV) tension below
which
particles
are not detected
Resolution
= ability
to differentiate
particles
with
very
close sizes
Calibration curve of an ACP
1
10
100
1000
10000
1 10 100
Size
Volta
ge (m
V) Noise level
> 4 µm c
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Concentration (mg/L)
Par
ticle
cou
nts
/ 25
mL
ACP 95 % line
Coïncidence level
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION/COUNTS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL40
Pore blockage
technique
Flow Decay
= P (particle
size / number)
Not particle
counting
but contamination
indication
Cannot
be
calibrated
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION/COUNTS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL41
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
100A
V
VV
STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES
POROSITY
-
Defined
by the ratio of void
volume to apparent volume
-
Measured
by pycnometry
-
Expressed
as a percentage
(%)
-
Not to be
confused
with
«
Filtration Rating
»
(in µm)
Not in micron !
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL42
STRUCTURAL
PROPERTIES
PORE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
-
Equivalent pore = capillary
tube of same
diameter
as the actual
pore
-
Measured
by air porometry
(not more Mercury)
-
Application of JURIN’s
law
using
a known
wetting
liquid
P = air pressure
= contact angle
= surface tension
d = «pore»
diameter
dCosP
4
Air
θ
Wetting
Liquid
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL43
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
0102030405060
Pore diameter (µm)
Diff
eren
tial f
low
rate
(%)
Maxi diameter : 23.15 µmMini diameter : 7.988 µm50% diameter : 15.01 µm
Filter ref. XXX (IFTS 1619)PORE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
-
The pressure of appearance
of the first flow (the lowest
pressure) defines
the Buble
Point used
to check the integrity
of a filtering
cartridge
-
Shape of curve
helps
in predicting
filtration behaviour
(surface or depth
clogging)
Bubble
Point
Pressure
Air
flow
Dry
Wet
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL44
HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES
PERMEABILITY
-
Defined
by DARCY law
µ
= liquid
viscosity
z = media thickness
Qe
= liquid
flowrate
(laminar) AF
= filtration surface area
∆P = applied
pressure
-
Characterizes
the porous
media only
HEAD LOSS
-
∆P vs flow velocity
in m3
/ m².h
(media)
-
∆P vs flow rate in m3
/ h (filter)
-
Measured
with
standard or real fluid
(viscosity)
-
Applied
to size filter
cartridge
and housing
PAzQµB
F
eO
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL45
DETERMINATION OF ∆P vs Q CURVE
TYPICAL
TEST STAND
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL46
HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES
CURVE OF DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE vs FLOW RATE
Pressure drop measurement generated by oil flowrate through filter element
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Flow rate (L/min)
DP
(hPa
)
24 cSt
300 cSt
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL47
STANDARD MEASUREMENTS OF PERFORMANCE
DEFINITIONS
EFFICIENCYAbility
to retain
suspended
particulate
contaminants that
may
affect system or engine
durability, reliability
and performance
CAPACITYMass of solid
contaminant retained
by the filter
element
when
it
is
clogged
and needs
to be
replaced
ABSOLUTE RATINGSize of the largest
glass bead
able to pass
the filter
element
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL48
SEPARATIVE PROPERTIES
ABSOLUTE RATING
-
Diameter
of the largest
glass bead
passing through
the media or the filter
in standard conditions
-
Since
nothing
to see
with
reality, no discussion on meaning
of results
-
Very
accurate
and repeatable
-
Allows
tiny
differenciation
of media
-
Standard method
MIL F 8815
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL49
SEPARATIVE PROPERTIES
FILTRATION EFFICIENCY
-
Characterises
the ability
to retain
suspended
matters
-
Defined
by the ratio of what
is
retained
to what
is
offered
-
Determined
by measuring
turbidity, concentration, numbers
of particles
at
various
sizes
-
Quantified
by a percentage
or a ratio
or a Log Reduction
Value
-
Varies with
operating conditions and throughout
filter
life
A B
A
BAE 100%
11100%E
BA
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL50
VARIOUS OPTIONS CHOOSEN BY PROFESSIONALS
Liquid: Water, mineral
oil, fuel, …
Multipass
or single pass
Particles:
silica
powders, carbon
black, iron
oxyde, microorganisms, …
Size distribution:
suited
to the pore size distribution to find
both
low
and 100 % efficiencies
Upstream
contaminant concentration:
level
and steady
or cyclic, few µg/L to 100mg/L
Analysis
technique:
overall
(gravimetry, turbidity) or particle
counts
per mL
in different
size ranges
Test time:
initial, throughout
life, average, minimum counts
per size range
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL51
RETENTION CAPACITY (CR
)
-
Mass of solid
contaminants captured
until
a given
operating limit
is
achieved
-
Possible operating limits: given
∆P, percentage
flow reduction, time, particle
breakthrough
(loss
of efficiency),
-
Contaminants: silica, mixture of silica, sand, Fe2
O3
,
-
Measured
on a flat sheet
media what
allows
extrapolation
-
Often
measured
with
efficiency
(multi or single pass)
Cr’
= Mr
/ A (mg/cm2) (specific
retention
capacity)
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES :(Dirt
Holding Capacity)
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL52
A. Contaminant injection circuitB. Filter test circuitC. Dilution and counting system
M
M
A B
C
M
A. Contaminant injection circuitB. Filter test circuitC. Dilution and counting system
M
M
A B
C
M
Typical
international standard test stand schematic
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL53
Typical
European
standard test stand schematic
(drinking
water and industrial
liquid
cartridge
filters)
BEHAVIORAL PROPERTIES : SEPARATION EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL54
SEPARATIVE PROPERTIES
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 20 40 60 80 100 120Injected mass (g)
Flow
rate
(L/m
in)
Pump A
Pump B
Example
of effect
of a poorly
specified
test equipment:Filtration Efficiency
and Retention
Capacity
of a drinking
water filtering
cartridgeper NSF 42§7.4 «
mechanical
reduction
testing
»
Influence of test pump
on time required
to reach
a 75% test flow rate decay
thuson mass of dust
retained
and thuson efficiency
claimed
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100injected mass of ISO FTD (g)
Flow
rate
(L/m
in)
Pump A
Pump B
Cartridge B
Cartridge A
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL55
INFLUENCE OF TEST PUMP
Cartridge B
On final efficiency
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Particle size (µm)
Filtr
atio
n ef
ficie
ncy
(%)
Pump APump B
After injection of 89 g of ISO FTD
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL56
FILTER TESTS STANDARDS : RECENT IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENTS TO ISO STANDARDS
•
MORE PRECISELY DEFINED AND CONTROLLED OPERATING CONDITIONS : TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE, FLUID CONDUCTIVITY, FLOWRATE, WAVE SHAPE, …
•
NEW TEST CONTAMINANTS (EFFICIENCY & CAPACITY)ISO 16889, ISO TR 13353, ISO 19438, ISO 4548-12
ACFTD →
ISO MTD (UF, F, C) (ISO 12103-1) →
NIST SRM 2806 (ISO TR 16144)
•
NEW AUTOMATIC PARTICLE COUNTER CALIBRATION
ISO 4402 →
ISO 11171 calibration→
ISO 11943 on-line counting
•
TEST STAND VALIDATION PROTOCOLS
•
INTERNATIONAL VALIDATION ROUND ROBIN20 to 30 laboratories
IMPROVED TESTS EASIER AND MORE RELIABLE COMPARISON
BUT STILL A LACK OF STANDARD DESIGNATION
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL57
SEPARATIVE PROPERTIES
FILTRATION EFFICIENCY
typical
results: single pass
per EN 13443-2
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL58
A big
step
forward
in NF 45-303, EN 13443-2 and ISO 19438 : clear
and standard definitions
of filter
ratings.
Reference
Filtration Rating (S µm)
: dimension, in micrometres, of the ISO MTD or ISO CTD particles at which the overall mean cumulative filtration efficiency of a filtering cartridge tested in accordance with the procedure described in this European standard, is greater than or equal to
99,8 %
Filter
Reference
Rating
: Particle
size (in µm(c)) corresponding
to an initial efficiency
or a cumulative overall
efficiency
of 99%.
All other
labels
(Nominal or Absolute) are only
commercial
ones. They
are meaningless
since
not standardised, i.e. not agreed
on by the filtration community
COMPARISON/QUALIFICATIONOF FILTER EFFICIENCIES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL59
NEW MULTIPASS TEST : CYCLIC FLOW
Principle
: ISO CD 23369
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL60
Test equipment
validation : wave
shape
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (s)
Q a
nd P
Q = f(t)P = f(t)
CYCLIC MULTIPASS TEST RESULTS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL61
CYCLIC MULTIPASS TEST
Test equipment
validation : wave
shape
+ online counts
stability
Comparative pressure drop with or without cyclic flowrate variation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Time (min)
P (b
ar)
Delta P - 20 L/min DP -20<->50 Lmin 1 Hz Delta P - 50 L/min DP (bar) 20<->50 Lmin 0,1 Hz
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL62
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time (min)
Part
icle
cou
nts
/10
mL
>4 µm c > 5 µm c > 6 µm c > 7 µm c > 8 µm c > 9 µm c > 10 µm c > 12 µm c>4 µm c > 5 µm c > 6 µm c > 7 µm c > 8 µm c > 9 µm c > 10 µm c > 12 µm c
UpstreamDownstream
Online particle
counts
CYCLIC MULTIPASSTEST RESULTS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL63
Typical
average
efficiency curve
(15 mg/L)
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Particle size (> µm(c))
Filtr
atio
n ef
ficie
ncy
(%)
ISO CD 23369 (1) ISO CD 23369 (2) ISO 16889
Efficiency decreases when flow cycles
Co = 15 mg/L ISO MTDQT = 25-100 L/min ; f = 0.1 Hz
CYCLIC MULTIPASS TEST
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL64
FILTER MEDIA PROPERTIES AND CHARACTERISATION
LogNsLogNe
BACTERIAL RETENTION
-
LRV = LOG REDUCTION VALUE = -
STANDARD MICROORGANISMS-
STERILE CONDITIONS-
SPECIFIC GROWTH CONDITIONS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL65
HIGH DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE (Element
burst/collapse pressure)
- ٧ = 500 mm²/s- max ∆P = 350 kPa
by steps
of 25 kPa
during
1 min (or as agreed
between
parties)-
use particulate
contaminant or high
viscosity
fluid
to increase
∆P if requiered
MEASUREMENTS OF RESISTANCE TO VARIOUS STRESSES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL66
HIGH TEMPERATURE
Immersion in hot fluid. E.g. lubricating
oil
filters·
2 x (96 h at
135 ±
2°C)·
Compare (Q, ∆P) before
and after
cooking
•
Circulation of hot fluid
through
clogged
media/cartridge
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Temps (min)
Para
met
res
Température *10 (°C) Pression différentielle 2 (mbar) Pression différentielle 1 (mbar)
MEASUREMENTS OF RESISTANCE TO VARIOUS STRESSES
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL67
ALL MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS
FILTRATION RATING
→ CHOICE OF FILTER MEDIA TYPECompatibility, max ∆P, …
→ DEFINITION OF REFERENCE RATING XX
= 200 for hydraulic filters (ISO 16889)EX
= 99.8% for automotive filtersLubricants (ISO 4548-12) ; fuels (ISO 19438)
EX
= 99.8% for industrial filters (NF X 45-303)EX
= 99.8% for drinking water filters (EN 13343-2)
CLEAN DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE→ EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS
∆P = f(VF
, ) VF & AF
mini
→ DARCY LAW
OMF B
ZµPQA
CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING AND SIZING CARTRIDGE FILTERS
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL68
CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING AND SIZING CARTRIDGE FILTERS
RETENTION CAPACITY (CR
)
→ CHOICE OF MEDIA ASSEMBLY
→ MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE MASS OF CONTAMINANT
RETAINED BEFORE EFFICIENCY DECREASES
- CR
= g or C’R = g/m²
(specific)
-
Determined by standard testsISO 16889, ISO 4548-12, ISO 19438NF X 45-303, NF L 51-134, EN 13343-2
→ MASS OF “SOLIDS”
FILTERED (MF
)
MF
= CF
x QF
x
CF = solid concentration (mg/L)QF = filtrate flowate
(L/day)
= filter life (day)
FILTRATION SURFACE AREA
FF
R
QCC
R
RF C
CA'
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL69
STANDARD TESTING ALLOWS CLEAR COMPARISONS
PARTICLE COUNTS / EFFICIENCY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL70
STANDARD TESTING ALLOWS CLEAR COMPARISONS
CLOGGING CURVES / CAPACITY
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL71
INTEGRITY TESTING
BUBBLE POINT AND PRESSURE HOLD TEST
dCosP
4
Pd
Wth
L
Relation RATING/BUBBLE POINT/PRESSURE DROP
DIA
09-3
5
Filtration 2009, 18-19 November 2009, Chicago, IL72
CONCLUSION
Variety
of filtering
media
Methods
and apparatus
of characterization
of particles
and suspensions
Methods
and equipment
of characterization
of porous
media and filter
elements
Validation of test methods/stands and calibration of measuring
instruments
Standard methods
to make
results
comparable