2
San Jose State University From the SelectedWorks of Madalyn Radlauer June, 2015 Frustrated ABC triblock terpolymers morphologies Madalyn R. Radlauer, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Yusuke Asai, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Christophe Sinturel, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Marc A. Hillmyer, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities Available at: https://works.bepress.com/madalyn-radlauer/ 19/

Frustrated ABC triblock terpolymers morphologies

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

San Jose State UniversityFrom the SelectedWorks of Madalyn Radlauer

June, 2015

Frustrated ABC triblock terpolymersmorphologiesMadalyn R. Radlauer, University of Minnesota - Twin CitiesYusuke Asai, University of Minnesota - Twin CitiesChristophe Sinturel, University of Minnesota - Twin CitiesMarc A. Hillmyer, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

Available at: https://works.bepress.com/madalyn-radlauer/

19/

normalized based on 1H NMR spectrum of SI-OH

end of chain (1) trace

THF

EO unit (2)

CH2-OH (1)

14.2 deg

-41.9 deg

In diblock polymers, composition and molecular weight are the most influential parameters on phase behavior. Adding more blocks makes

sequence a powerful influence as well.

An ABC triblock polymer can access a variety of morphologies that cannot be accessed in a diblock polymer. These morphologies are

driven, in part, by the incompatibility of the covalently linked blocks.

Frustrated ABC triblock terpolymer morphologiesMadalyn R. Radlauer, Yusuke Asai,† Christophe Sinturel,‡ Marc A. Hillmyer

Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455†Nagoya University, Japan ‡Université d’Orléans, France

Frustration of multiblock polymers

PS-b-PI-b-PLA synthesis and molecular characterization

Thermal characterization of the polymers

Probing bulk morphology by SAXS and TEM

Acknowledgements

Block assignment and thin film morphology from AFM

Advanced Photon Source DND-CAT

Data collected by Sam Dalsin

University of Minnesota and the U of M

Characterization Facility

Future work

aCalculated from relative integrations in the 1H NMR spectra that were normalized based on the end group in thediblock precursor. bDispersity from LS-SEC in THF at 25 °C. cVolume fractions determined using 140 °C densities ρ(PS) =0.969 g/cm3, ρ(PI) = 0.83 g/cm3, and ρ(PLA) = 1.154 g/cm3.

5 % mass loss occurred around 320 °C for both polymers.

0 100 200 300 400 500

0

20

40

60

80

100

Wei

ght

(%)

T (°C)

SIL (16/14/9)

SIL (16/14/19)

under N2

rate = 10 °C/min

TGA

-50 0 50 100 150

Hea

t Fl

ow (

Nor

mal

ized

) (W

/g)

T (°C)

SIL (16/14/9)

SIL (16/14/19)

0.1 W/g

under N2

rate = 10 °C/minexo down

Tg,PI = -60 °C

Tg,PLA = 53 °C

Tg,PS = 85 °C

The second heating thermal scan is shown. Tg’s of PI and PLA are clear from trace. Tg of PS confirmed by rheology.

DSC

DMA temperature sweep upon heating; rate = 5 °C/min; ω = 3rad/s (black) and 1 rad/s (green and blue); strain < 10 %. No TODT

observed.

Room temperature SAXS 1-D patterns. Samples were solvent cast for 1 week at ambient temperature and thermally annealed for 24 h at 120 °C. The peaksexpected for hexagonal symmetry are labeled relative to the measured principle scattering peak, q*.

Bailey, T. S.; Pham, H. D.; Bates F. S. Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 6994-7008.Epps, T. H.; Bailey, T. S.; Waletzko, R.; Bates, F. S. Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 2873-2881.

Degree of incompatability: χPI-PEO > χPS-PEO > χPS-PI

B A C

not frustrated FRUSTRATED

NA = NB = NC = NA’

NA = NA’ NA ≠ NA’

Synthesis modeled from: Touris, A.; Chanpuriya, S.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Bates, F. S. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 5551-5559.

SAXS consistent with hexagonal symmetry

50nm

DTEM ≈ 50 nm

Room temperature TEM images. Samples were solvent cast for 1 week at ambient temperature and thermally annealed for 24 h at 120 °C. Samples were stainedwith OsO4 and I2. Assignments based on staining and an etching experiment with AFM (below): matrix = PS, cylinder shell = PI, and cylinder core = PLA.

Legrand, P; Lesieur, S.; Bochot, A.; Gref, R.; Raatjes, W.; Barratt, G.; Vauthier, C. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 344, 33–43. Arichi, S.; Matsuura, H.; Tanimoto, Y.; Murata, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1966, 39, 434-439. Hiemenz, P. C.; Lodge, T. P. Polymer Chemistry, 2nd Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2007.

PS-PI-P2VP (15/13/15) PS-PI-PEO (10/9/11)

Solubility parameters (cal/cm3)1/2 illustrate frustration and suggest origin of morphology: PLA, 11.4 > P2VP, 10.4 > PEO, 9.9 > PS, 9.1 > PI, 8.1

Tapping mode AFM phase (left) and height (right) images of SIL polymer thin films on HMDS modified Si substrates after annealing at 130 °C for 14 h, underreduced pressure. Sample thickness: 43 nm (for SIL (16/14/19)). PLA etched with 0.5 M NaOH solution in MeOH/H2O.

original height image PLA removed height image

7.0 nm

-15 nm

SIL (16/14/19) 5 min of solvent vapor annealing with THF

Tapping mode AFM phase images of SIL polymer thin films on unmodified Si substrates after solvent vapor annealingwith THF for 5 (top) or 10 (bottom) minutes. Sample thickness: 28 nm.

0.1 μm

0.1 μm

16.0 deg

-38.3 deg

SIL (16/14/19) 10 min of solvent vapor annealing with THF

14.0 deg

-33.9 deg

0.1 μm 0.1 μm

Zheng, W.; Wang, Z.-G. Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 7215-7223.

A B C

An example: PI-PS-PEO versus “frustrated” triblock, PS-PI-PEO

Polystyrene-b-polyisoprene-b-polylactide (SIL) triblock polymers present a highly frustrated system

that can be used to access interesting morphologies in the bulk and in thin films. SIL polymers with

equal volume fractions of the styrene and isoprene blocks have not been previously studied. We

aimed to characterize these materials and compare the

morphological consequences of frustration in the bulk and thin film.

Degree of incompatability: χPI-PLA > χPS-PLA > χPS-PI

1H NMR spectrum of SIL (16/14/19)LS-SEC, RI traces

Rheology of SIL (16/14/19)

• Electron tomography and AFM imaging of the surface of a bulk sample will be utilized to link the bulkand thin film morphologies.

• Bulk morphologies of asymmetric ABCA’ tetrablocks are unexplored. A multitude of molecularvariables in ABCA’ polymers can be systematically tuned. To that end we are targeting ABCA’tetrablock terpolymers: polystyrene-b-polyisoprene-b-polylactide-b-polystyrene (SILS’). We will focuson highly frustrated systems (circled in red) and vary the asymmetry (ξ) of the A and A’ blocks.

Bates, F. S.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Lodge, T. P.; Bates, C. M.; Delaney, K. T.; Fredrickson, G. H. Science, 2012, 336, 434-440.

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1

1

10

100

1000

Inte

nsi

ty (

a.u

.)

q (nm-1)

q*

(3)q*

2q*

(7)q*

3q*

(12)q*

(13)q*

4q*

(19)q*

(21)q*

5q*

(28)q*

(31)q*

6q*

DSAXS = 2π/q* = 54 nm

SIL (16/14/19)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.1

1

10

100

1000

Inte

nsi

ty (

a.u

.)

q (nm-1)

q*

(3)q*

2q*

(7)q*

3q*

(12)q*

(13)q*

4q*(19)q*

DSAXS = 2π/q* = 42 nmSIL (16/14/9)

SIL (16/14/19)DTEM ≈ 40 nmSIL (16/14/9)

50nm

TEM reveals core-shell cylinders with non-constant mean curvature

Comparison with other frustrated ABC triblock polymers at equal composition

Gido, S.P.; Schwark, D. W.; Thomas, E. L.; Goncalves, M. C. Macromolecules, 1993, 26, 2636-2640. Bailey, T. S.; Pham, H. D.; Bates, F. S. Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 6994-7008.

AFM confirms cylindrical core is PLA and reveals spheres-on-cylinders

AFM images of PS-PI-PLA (16/14/19) post thermal annealing and post PLA etching

Comparison of PS-PI-PLA (16/14/19) (left) and PS-PI-PLA (16/14/9) (right) post thermal annealing

Spheres-on-(parallel)-cylinders post solvent vapor annealing

original phase image

Spheres-on-cylinders favorability arises from trading IL contacts for SL contacts

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180103

104

105

106

107

108 G' (25 mm plates)

G'' (25 mm plates)

G' (25 mm plates)

G'' (25 mm plates)

G' (8 mm plates)

G'' (8 mm plates)

G' (

fille

d)

and

G''

(op

en)

(Pa)

T (°C)

22 24 26 28

Elution volume (mL)

SI (16/14)

SIL (16/14/19)

SIL (16/14/9)

A B C

7.0 nm

-15 nm

Mn PSa

(kg/mol)Mn PIa

(kg/mol)Mn PLAa

(kg/mol)Ðb ϕPS

c ϕPIc ϕPLA

c

SIL (16/14/19) 15.9 14.2 19.0 1.01 0.33 0.34 0.33

SIL (16/14/9) 15.9 14.2 09.2 1.01 0.40 0.41 0.19