44
FRR PRESENTATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW WOJCIECHOWSKI ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO MENTOR: CHRIS CREWS

FRR Presentation · 2020. 12. 10. · frr presentation university of south alabama launch society bill brown, beecher faust, rockwell garrido, carson schaff, michael wiesneth, matthew

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • FRRPRESENTATION

    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY

    BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW

    WOJCIECHOWSKI

    ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO

    MENTOR: CHRIS CREWS

  • Vehicle DimensionsOVERALL LENGTH: 93” BODY DIAMETER: 5” LIFT OFF WEIGHT: 22..93 LBS COUPLER LENGTH (

    AVIONICS BAY): 11”

    NOSE CONE LENGTH: 20” BODY

    LENGTH: 73”

    NOSE CONE SHAPE: OGIVE COMPONENT

    MATERIAL: FIBERGLASS

  • Key Vehicle Design Features

    ● Clipped Delta fin planform

    ● Aluminum tubing to shield servo wires

    ● Roll fin stabilization bracket

    ● Screw cap motor retention

  • FINAL PAYLOAD DESIGN

    • FINAL ROLL INDUCTION SYSTEM DESIGN

    • FINAL VERIFICATION SYSTEM

    • ELECTRICAL PAYLOAD COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE

    • PAYLOAD CONSTRUCTION AND INTEGRATION

    • PAYLOAD SAFETY DESIGN CRITERIA

  • Final Roll InductionSystem Design

    • ROLL FINS WILL BE CONNECTED DIRECTLY

    TO TWO SEPARATE SERVOS

    • AN ARDUINO MEGA WILL SEND EQUIVALENT

    SIGNALS TO BOTH SERVOS TO ENSURE

    EQUAL ROLL FIN DEFLECTION

  • Roll Fin Functionality and Design

    • ROLL FIN WILL BE PLACED INSIDE THE

    MAIN FIN AND FIXED TO SERVO SHAFT

    • MAX VELOCITY START CONDITION - 200 FT/S

    • ROLL FIN CANT PROFILE WILL BE

    • 3 SECONDS +45 DEGREES

    • 2 SECONDS -45 DEGREES

    • 1 SECOND NEUTRAL

  • Final Verification System Design

    • DUAL SENSOR REDUNDANCY TO BE USED AS VERIFICATION

    METHOD

    • DATA WILL BE RECORDED ONTO AN MICROSD CARD

    TO BE OBSERVED POST FLIGHT

    • BOTH SENSORS SHOWING COMPLETION OF PAYLOAD OBJECTIVE

    WILL SERVE AS SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Main Controller Constructed

  • Electrical Payload Components

    ARDUINO MEGA

    • MICROCONTROLLER USED FOR SENSOR

    COMMUNICATION AND SERVO OUTPUT

  • Electrical Payload Components

    10 DOF IMU BREAKOUT

    • MAIN DATA COLLECTION DEVICE USED IN THE ROLL

    INDUCTION SYSTEM

    • ROTATIONAL VELOCITY AND ORIENTATION WILL

    BE COLLECTED

    • DATA WILL BE STORED ON A MICROSD FOR

    PAYLOAD OBJECTIVE COMPLETION VERIFICATION

  • Electrical Payload Components

    9 DOF IMU BREAKOUT

    • POSSESSES SIMILAR CAPABILITIES AND COMPONENTS

    OF THE 10 DOF

    • DATA WILL BE STORED ON A MICROSD FOR

    PAYLOAD OBJECTIVE COMPLETION VERIFICATION

  • Electrical Payload Components

    GPS BREAKOUT

    • WILL PROVIDE A DATA TIMESTAMP TO BE USED IN THE

    VERIFICATION SYSTEM

  • Electrical Payload Components

    MICROSD BREAKOUT

    • ROLL RATE AND ORIENTATION DATA WILL BE

    STORED FOR POST FLIGHT ANALYSIS

  • Hardware Payload Components

    PAYLOAD COUPLER

    • 9 INCH FIBERGLASS BAY

    • 0.08 INCH WALL THICKNESS

  • Hardware Payload Components

    BULKHEAD END CAPS

    • USED TO SEAL BOTH ENDS OF THE PAYLOAD

    COUPLER TUBE

    • PROTECTS PAYLOAD FROM BLACKPOWDER

    EXPLOSIONS NECESSARY FOR CHUTE DEPLOYMENT

  • Hardware Payload Components

    ELECTRONICS SLED

    • 3D PRINTED WITH MOUNTING HOLES

    COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARDUINO MEGA

    • BATTERY COMPARTMENT WILL BE USED

    TO SECURE THE POWER SOURCE

  • Hardware Payload Components

    TOWER PRO MG995R HIGH TORQUE SERVO

    • ONE SERVO WILL BE CONNECTED TO EACH OF THE

    TWO ROLL FINS

    • SERVO HORN WILL BE MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE

    ROLL FIN

  • Motor Description

    MOTOR SELECTED: K480W-P

    TOTAL IMPULSE: 515.93 LBF-S

    WITH THE AS BUILT MASS OF THE LAUNCH VEHICLE THIS MOTOR ACHIEVED AN ALTITUDE OF

    4538 FT.

    AS SIMULATED USING OPENROCKET AND ACTUAL MASSES OF THE FULL SCALE ROCKET.

  • STABILITY AT RAIL EXIT = 2.6

    STATIC STABILITY = 2.62

  • Center of Pressure and Center of Gravity Locations

    CENTER OF PRESSURE = 72.8 IN FROM NOSE CONE

    CENTER OF GRAVITY = 59.3 IN FROM NOSE CONE

    THESE ARE ACTUAL VALUES OBTAINED WITH THE FULL SCALE VEHICLE

    \

  • Thrust to Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Velocity

    AVERAGE THRUST / WEIGHT = 124.54 LB /22.93 LB = 5.43

    RAIL EXIT VELOCITY = 61 FT/S

    THIS IS ABOVE THE MINIMUM OF 52 FT/S

    OPENROCKET SIMULATION WITH ACTUAL MASSES OF THE FULL SCALE VEHICLE

  • Mass Statement

    TOTAL MASS WITH LOADED MOTOR = 22.93 LB

    TOTAL MASS WITH EMPTY MOTOR =20.22 LB

  • Recovery Subsystem - Parachutes

    DROGUE PARACHUTE: 24” NYLON

    MAIN PARACHUTE: 84” NYLON

    RECOVERY HARNESS: KEVLAR TIED TO WELDED EYEBOLTS

    KEVLAR SIZE: 0.55 IN

    HARNESS LENGTH: 24 FT

    DROGUE DESCENT RATE: 85.9 FT/S

    MAIN DESCENT RATE: 23.3 FT/S

  • Kinetic Energy At Key Phases

    WHEN MAIN PARACHUTE DEPLOYS THE BOOSTER SECTION EXPERIENCES 653 FT-LBS

    THESE VALUES ARE FOR LANDING IMPACT

  • Predicted Drift and Altitude

    DRIFT DISTANCE ALTITUDE

    5 MPH WIND: 150 FT 4526 FT

    10 MPH WIND: 250 FT 4486 FT

    15 MPH WIND: 550 FT 4441 FT

    20 MPH WIND: 850 FT 4371 FT

  • Payload Integration

    BULKHEAD CLOSES UP ONE END

    INSERT CENTER ROD

    INSERT ELECTRONICS SLED

    SEAL PAYLOAD WITH SECOND BULKHEAD

  • Payload Integration

    SERVO INSERTED INTO PLACE FROM OUTSIDE THE ROCKET BODY

    CENTERING PIN LINKING SERVO TO MAIN FIN

  • Payload Integration

    ASSEMBLED FROM OUTSIDE THE ROCKET

    INSERTED THROUGH THE REAR OF THE ROCKET

  • Testing

    • SOFTWARE TESTING

    • HARDWARE TESTING

    • PAYLOAD TESTING

  • Software Testing

    • PRELIMINARY DATA COLLECTION TEST

    • GPS AND SERVO COMPATIBILITY

    • SIMULTANEOUS I2C PORT READING

  • Hardware Testing

    • SERVO TORQUE OUTPUT TEST

    • CONTROL SYSTEM BATTERY LIFE TEST

  • Payload Testing

    • MAKESHIFT PAYLOAD CONSTRUCTED

    • TESTING IN WIND TUNNEL

    • MAX SPEED 88 FT/S

  • Payload Testing• CANTILEVER SUPPORT SYSTEM

    • 4 SUPPORTS FOR DISTRIBUTED LOAD

    • BEARING SYSTEM TO ALLOW ISOLATED ROTATION

    • BEARINGS FIXED INSIDE SUPPORTS

  • Payload Testing• ENTIRE ROCKET PLACED IN WIND TUNNEL

    • WEIGHTS USED TO COUNTERBALANCE

    • CANT PROFILE

    • 10 SECONDS +45

    • 5 SECONDS -45

    • 5 SECONDS NEUTRAL

  • Payload Testing Results

    • ROLL INDUCTION OF 6.9 REVOLUTIONS OVER 10 SECONDS

    • COUNTER ROLL STABILITY NEUTRALIZED ROLL

  • Full Scale Flight Test

    MOTOR USED = AEROTECH K535W-14A

    FULL SCALE THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO: 5.38

    APOGEE: 1881 FT

    SIMULATION APOGEE: 2466 FT

    MAX VELOCITY: 231 FT/S

  • Launch Results

    • KEVLAR FAILED AFTER MAIN CHUTE DEPLOYMENT

    • BOOSTER SECTION DETACHED

    • FREE DESCENT OF 700 FT

    • ELECTRONICS DESTROYED UPON IMPACT

    • MAJORITY OF ROCKET SALVAGEABLE

    • PLAN TO LAUNCH 3/11 IF ALLOWED

  • Recovery System Tests

    • THE TEAM WILL UTILIZE THE SAME DUAL

    DEPLOY RECOVERY SYSTEM AS USED IN

    PRELIMINARY ROCKETS

    • ALTIMETERS HAVE BEEN TESTED FOR

    FUNCTIONALITY

    • GROUND IGNITION TESTS SUCCESSFUL

  • Updated Team Derived Requirements

    ● Team must produce optimal roll

    fin system

    Verification: A square roll fin has been

    chosen as this design provides simplicity

    for airflow analysis

  • Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)

    ● Equalize Roll Fin Deflection

    Verification: Hexagonal cross section will

    be used for servo to roll fin shaft to

    minimize potential for angular offset

    between the servo and roll fin

  • Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)

    ● Implementation of derivative

    gain to reduce overshoot

    Verification: Team is pursuing an open

    loop control system as this should

    provide sufficient functionality

  • Interfaces With Ground Systems

    • THE FULL SCALE TEST LAUNCH ENSURED THAT

    THE VEHICLE IS COMPATIBLE WITH STANDARD

    LAUNCH RAILS AND LAUNCH PADS

    • A TRANSMITTER IS FIXED IN THE ROCKET TO ALL

    THE ROCKET TO BE TRACKED THROUGHOUT ITS

    FLIGHT

  • References1) Time-Domain Characteristics on Response Plot. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/help/control/ug/view-system-

    characteristics-on-response-plots.html

    2) Fried, Limor.Adafruit. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2016. https://www.adafruit.com

    3) Miguel, V. S. (2012). Mathematically Modeling Aeroelastic Flutter. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/vjs5077/projects/fin-

    flutter.html

    https://www.adafruit.com

  • Acknowledgements

    We would like to thank the Alabama Space

    Grant Consortium for providing generous

    funds to support this project.

    Structure BookmarksSlideSpanFRRFRRFRR

    PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION

    UUUNIVERSITYOFSOUTHALABAMALAUNCHSOCIETY

    BBILLBROWN, BEECHERFAUST, ROCKWELLGARRIDO, CARSONSCHAFF, MICHAELWIESNETH, MATTHEWWOJCIECHOWSKI

    AADVISOR: CARLOSMONTALVO

    MMENTOR: CHRISCREWS

    SlideSpanFigureVehicle DimensionsVehicle DimensionsVehicle Dimensions

    OOOVERALLLENGTH: 93”BODYDIAMETER: 5”

    LLIFTOFFWEIGHT: 22..93 LBSCOUPLERLENGTH( AVIONICSBAY): 11”

    NNOSECONELENGTH: 20”BODYLENGTH: 73”

    NNOSECONESHAPE: OGIVECOMPONENTMATERIAL: FIBERGLASS

    SlideSpanKey Vehicle Design FeaturesKey Vehicle Design FeaturesKey Vehicle Design Features

    ●●●●●Clipped Delta fin planform

    ●●●Aluminum tubing to shield servo wires

    ●●●Roll fin stabilization bracket

    ●●●Screw cap motor retention

    FigureFigure

    SlideSpanFINALFINALFINALPAYLOAD DESIGN

    •••••FINALROLLINDUCTIONSYSTEMDESIGN

    •••FINALVERIFICATIONSYSTEM

    •••ELECTRICALPAYLOADCOMPONENTSANDHARDWARE

    •••PAYLOADCONSTRUCTIONANDINTEGRATION

    •••PAYLOADSAFETYDESIGNCRITERIA

    SlideSpanFinal Roll InductionFinal Roll InductionFinal Roll Induction

    System DesignSystem Design

    •••••ROLLFINSWILLBECONNECTEDDIRECTLY

    TOTOTWOSEPARATESERVOS

    ••••ANARDUINOMEGAWILLSENDEQUIVALENT

    SIGNALSSIGNALSTOBOTHSERVOSTOENSURE

    EQUALEQUALROLLFINDEFLECTION

    Figure

    SlideSpanRoll Fin Functionality and DesignRoll Fin Functionality and DesignRoll Fin Functionality and Design

    •••••ROLLFINWILLBEPLACEDINSIDETHE

    MAINMAINFINANDFIXEDTOSERVOSHAFT

    ••••MAXVELOCITYSTARTCONDITION-200 FT/S

    •••ROLLFINCANTPROFILEWILLBE

    ••••3 SECONDS+45 DEGREES

    •••2 SECONDS-45 DEGREES

    •••1 SECONDNEUTRAL

    Figure

    SlideSpanFinal Verification System DesignFinal Verification System DesignFinal Verification System Design

    •••••DUALSENSORREDUNDANCYTOBEUSEDASVERIFICATION

    METHODMETHOD

    ••••DATAWILLBERECORDEDONTOANMICROSD CARD

    TOTOBEOBSERVEDPOSTFLIGHT

    ••••BOTHSENSORSSHOWINGCOMPLETIONOFPAYLOADOBJECTIVE

    WILLWILLSERVEASSUCCESSCRITERIA

    Figure

    SlideSpanMain Controller ConstructedMain Controller ConstructedMain Controller Constructed

    Figure

    SlideSpanElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload Components

    AAARDUINOMEGA

    ••••MICROCONTROLLERUSEDFORSENSOR

    COMMUNICATIONCOMMUNICATIONANDSERVOOUTPUT

    Figure

    SlideSpanElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload Components

    10 DOF IMU B10 DOF IMU B10 DOF IMU BREAKOUT

    ••••MAINDATACOLLECTIONDEVICEUSEDINTHEROLL

    INDUCTIONINDUCTIONSYSTEM

    ••••ROTATIONALVELOCITYANDORIENTATIONWILL

    BEBECOLLECTED

    ••••DATAWILLBESTOREDONAMICROSD FOR

    PAYLOADPAYLOADOBJECTIVECOMPLETIONVERIFICATION

    Figure

    SlideSpanElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload Components

    9 DOF IMU B9 DOF IMU B9 DOF IMU BREAKOUT

    ••••POSSESSESSIMILARCAPABILITIESANDCOMPONENTS

    OFOFTHE10 DOF

    ••••DATAWILLBESTOREDONAMICROSD FOR

    PAYLOADPAYLOADOBJECTIVECOMPLETIONVERIFICATION

    Figure

    SlideSpanElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload Components

    GPS BGPS BGPS BREAKOUT

    ••••WILLPROVIDEADATATIMESTAMPTOBEUSEDINTHE

    VERIFICATIONVERIFICATIONSYSTEM

    Figure

    SlideSpanElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload ComponentsElectrical Payload Components

    MMMICROSD BREAKOUT

    ••••ROLLRATEANDORIENTATIONDATAWILLBE

    STOREDSTOREDFORPOSTFLIGHTANALYSIS

    Figure

    SlideSpanHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload Components

    PPPAYLOADCOUPLER

    ••••9 INCHFIBERGLASSBAY

    •••0.08 INCHWALLTHICKNESS

    Figure

    SlideSpanHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload Components

    BBBULKHEADENDCAPS

    ••••USEDTOSEALBOTHENDSOFTHEPAYLOAD

    COUPLERCOUPLERTUBE

    ••••PROTECTSPAYLOADFROMBLACKPOWDER

    EXPLOSIONSEXPLOSIONSNECESSARYFORCHUTEDEPLOYMENT

    Figure

    SlideSpanHardware Payload Components Hardware Payload Components Hardware Payload Components

    EEELECTRONICSSLED

    ••••3D PRINTEDWITHMOUNTINGHOLES

    COMPATIBLECOMPATIBLEWITHTHEARDUINOMEGA

    ••••BATTERYCOMPARTMENTWILLBEUSED

    TOTOSECURETHEPOWERSOURCE

    Figure

    SlideSpanHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload ComponentsHardware Payload Components

    TTTOWERPROMG995R HIGHTORQUESERVO

    ••••ONESERVOWILLBECONNECTEDTOEACHOFTHE

    TWOTWOROLLFINS

    ••••SERVOHORNWILLBEMOUNTEDDIRECTLYTOTHE

    ROLLROLLFIN

    Figure

    SlideSpanMotor DescriptionMotor DescriptionMotor Description

    MMMOTORSELECTED: K480W-P

    TTOTALIMPULSE: 515.93 LBF-S

    WWITHTHEASBUILTMASSOFTHELAUNCHVEHICLETHISMOTORACHIEVEDANALTITUDEOF4538 FT.

    AASSIMULATEDUSINGOPENROCKETANDACTUALMASSESOFTHEFULLSCALEROCKET.

    Figure

    SlideSpanFigureSSSTABILITYATRAILEXIT= 2.6

    SSTATICSTABILITY= 2.62

    Figure

    SlideSpanCenter of Pressure and Center of Gravity LocationsCenter of Pressure and Center of Gravity LocationsCenter of Pressure and Center of Gravity Locations

    CCCENTEROFPRESSURE= 72.8 INFROMNOSECONE

    CCENTEROFGRAVITY= 59.3 INFROMNOSECONE

    TTHESEAREACTUALVALUESOBTAINEDWITHTHEFULLSCALEVEHICLE

    \\

    SlideSpanThrust to Weight Ratio and Rail Exit VelocityThrust to Weight Ratio and Rail Exit VelocityThrust to Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Velocity

    AAAVERAGETHRUST/ WEIGHT= 124.54 LB/22.93 LB= 5.43

    RRAILEXITVELOCITY= 61 FT/S

    THISTHISISABOVETHEMINIMUMOF52 FT/S

    OOPENROCKETSIMULATIONWITHACTUALMASSESOFTHEFULLSCALEVEHICLE

    SlideSpanMass StatementMass StatementMass Statement

    TTTOTALMASSWITHLOADEDMOTOR= 22.93 LB

    TTOTALMASSWITHEMPTYMOTOR=20.22 LB

    FigureFigure

    SlideSpanRecovery Subsystem Recovery Subsystem Recovery Subsystem -Parachutes

    DDDROGUEPARACHUTE: 24” NYLON

    MMAINPARACHUTE: 84” NYLON

    RRECOVERYHARNESS: KEVLARTIEDTOWELDEDEYEBOLTS

    KKEVLARSIZE: 0.55 IN

    HHARNESSLENGTH: 24 FT

    DDROGUEDESCENTRATE: 85.9 FT/S

    MMAINDESCENTRATE: 23.3 FT/S

    SlideSpanFigureFigureKinetic Energy At Key PhasesKinetic Energy At Key PhasesKinetic Energy At Key Phases

    WWWHENMAINPARACHUTEDEPLOYSTHEBOOSTERSECTIONEXPERIENCES653 FT-LBS

    TTHESEVALUESAREFORLANDINGIMPACT

    SlideSpanFigurePredicted Drift and AltitudePredicted Drift and AltitudePredicted Drift and Altitude

    DDDRIFTDISTANCEALTITUDE

    5 5 MPHWIND: 150 FT4526 FT

    10 10 MPHWIND: 250 FT4486 FT

    15 15 MPHWIND: 550 FT4441 FT

    20 20 MPHWIND: 850 FT4371 FT

    SlideSpanPayload IntegrationPayload IntegrationPayload Integration

    BBBULKHEADCLOSESUPONEEND

    IINSERTCENTERROD

    IINSERTELECTRONICSSLED

    SSEALPAYLOADWITHSECONDBULKHEAD

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload IntegrationPayload IntegrationPayload Integration

    SSSERVOINSERTEDINTOPLACEFROMOUTSIDETHEROCKETBODY

    CCENTERINGPINLINKINGSERVOTOMAINFIN

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload IntegrationPayload IntegrationPayload Integration

    ASSEMBLEDASSEMBLEDASSEMBLEDFROMOUTSIDETHEROCKET

    IINSERTEDTHROUGHTHEREAROFTHEROCKET

    Figure

    SlideSpanTestingTestingTesting

    •••••SOFTWARETESTING

    •••HARDWARETESTING

    •••PAYLOADTESTING

    Figure

    SlideSpanSoftware TestingSoftware TestingSoftware Testing

    •••••PRELIMINARYDATACOLLECTIONTEST

    •••GPS ANDSERVOCOMPATIBILITY

    •••SIMULTANEOUSI2C PORTREADING

    Figure

    SlideSpanHardware TestingHardware TestingHardware Testing

    •••••SERVOTORQUEOUTPUTTEST

    •••CONTROLSYSTEMBATTERYLIFETEST

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload TestingPayload TestingPayload Testing

    •••••MAKESHIFTPAYLOADCONSTRUCTED

    •••TESTINGINWINDTUNNEL

    ••••MAXSPEED88 FT/S

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload TestingPayload TestingPayload Testing

    •••••CANTILEVERSUPPORTSYSTEM

    ••••4 SUPPORTSFORDISTRIBUTEDLOAD

    •••BEARINGSYSTEMTOALLOWISOLATEDROTATION

    ••••BEARINGSFIXEDINSIDESUPPORTS

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload TestingPayload TestingPayload Testing

    •••••ENTIREROCKETPLACEDINWINDTUNNEL

    ••••WEIGHTSUSEDTOCOUNTERBALANCE

    •••CANTPROFILE

    ••••10 SECONDS+45

    •••5 SECONDS-45

    •••5 SECONDSNEUTRAL

    Figure

    SlideSpanPayload Testing ResultsPayload Testing ResultsPayload Testing Results

    •••••ROLLINDUCTIONOF6.9 REVOLUTIONSOVER10 SECONDS

    •••COUNTERROLLSTABILITYNEUTRALIZEDROLL

    FigureFigure

    SlideSpanFull Scale Flight TestFull Scale Flight TestFull Scale Flight Test

    MMMOTORUSED= AEROTECHK535W-14A

    FFULLSCALETHRUSTTOWEIGHTRATIO: 5.38

    AAPOGEE: 1881 FT

    SSIMULATIONAPOGEE: 2466 FT

    MMAXVELOCITY: 231 FT/S

    Figure

    SlideSpanLaunch ResultsLaunch ResultsLaunch Results

    •••••KEVLARFAILEDAFTERMAINCHUTEDEPLOYMENT

    •••BOOSTERSECTIONDETACHED

    ••••FREEDESCENTOF700 FT

    •••ELECTRONICSDESTROYEDUPONIMPACT

    •••MAJORITYOFROCKETSALVAGEABLE

    ••••PLANTOLAUNCH3/11 IFALLOWED

    SlideSpanRecovery System TestsRecovery System TestsRecovery System Tests

    •••••THETEAMWILLUTILIZETHESAMEDUALDEPLOYRECOVERYSYSTEMASUSEDINPRELIMINARYROCKETS

    •••ALTIMETERSHAVEBEENTESTEDFORFUNCTIONALITY

    •••GROUNDIGNITIONTESTSSUCCESSFUL

    Figure

    SlideSpanUpdated Team Derived RequirementsUpdated Team Derived RequirementsUpdated Team Derived Requirements

    ●●●●●Team must produce optimal roll fin system

    Verification: A square roll fin has been Verification: A square roll fin has been Verification: A square roll fin has been chosen as this design provides simplicity for airflow analysis

    Figure

    SlideSpanUpdated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)

    ●●●●●Equalize Roll Fin Deflection

    Verification: Hexagonal cross section will Verification: Hexagonal cross section will Verification: Hexagonal cross section will be used for servo to roll fin shaft to minimize potential for angular offset between the servo and roll fin

    Figure

    SlideSpanUpdated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)Updated Team Derived Requirements (cont.)

    ●●●●●Implementation of derivative gain to reduce overshoot

    Verification: Team is pursuing an open Verification: Team is pursuing an open Verification: Team is pursuing an open loop control system as this should provide sufficient functionality

    Figure

    SlideSpanInterfaces With Ground SystemsInterfaces With Ground SystemsInterfaces With Ground Systems

    FigureSpan•••••THEFULLSCALETESTLAUNCHENSUREDTHATTHEVEHICLEISCOMPATIBLEWITHSTANDARDLAUNCHRAILSANDLAUNCHPADS

    •••A TRANSMITTERISFIXEDINTHEROCKETTOALLTHEROCKETTOBETRACKEDTHROUGHOUTITSFLIGHT

    Figure

    SlideSpanReferencesReferencesReferences

    1) Time1) Time1) Time-Domain Characteristics on Response Plot. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.mathworks.com/help/control/ug/view-system-characteristics-on-response-plots.html

    2) Fried, Limor.Adafruit. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2016. 2) Fried, Limor.Adafruit. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2016. https://www.adafruit.comhttps://www.adafruit.comSpan

    3) Miguel, V. S. (2012). Mathematically Modeling Aeroelastic Flutter. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/vjs5077/proj3) Miguel, V. S. (2012). Mathematically Modeling Aeroelastic Flutter. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/vjs5077/projects/fin-flutter.html

    SlideSpanAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

    We would like to thank the Alabama Space We would like to thank the Alabama Space We would like to thank the Alabama Space Grant Consortium for providing generous funds to support this project.

    Figure