25
From Technologies to Market Lithography Technologies for More than Moore Amandine Pizzagalli From Technologies to Market 2018 LETI – Lithography Workshop

From Technologies to Market - CEA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: From Technologies to Market - CEA

From Technologies to Market

Lithography Technologies for More than

Moore

Amandine Pizzagalli

From Technologies to Market

2018 LETI – Lithography Workshop

Page 2: From Technologies to Market - CEA

2©2018 | www.yole.fr | About Yole Développement

YOLE DEVELOPPEMENT – 4 DIVISIONS

Life Sciences

& Healthcare o Microfluidic

o BioMEMS

o Inkjet Printing

o Solid-State Medical Imaging& BioPhotonics

o BioTechnologies

Power

& Wireless

o RF Devices&Technology

o Compound Semiconductors& Emerging Materials

o Power Electronics

o Batteries & Energy Management

Semiconductor

& Software o Package &Assembly & Substrates

o SemiconductorManufacturing

o Memory

o Software & Computing

Photonics,

Sensing & Display

o Solid-State Lighting & Display

o MEMS,Sensors & Actuators

o Imaging

o Photonics & Optoelectronics

Semiconductor

& Software

Power & Wireless

Photonics,

Sensing

& Display

Life

Sciences &

Healthcare

Page 3: From Technologies to Market - CEA

3©2018 | www.yole.fr | About Yole Développement

OUR GLOBAL ACTIVITY

30%of our business

40%of our business 30%

of our business

Greater

China office

Yole Japan

HQ in Lyon

Nantes

Paris

Nice

Vénissieux

Europe office

Frankfurt

Hsinchu

Tokyo

Yole Inc.

Phoenix

Yole Korea

Seoul

Palo Alto

Page 4: From Technologies to Market - CEA

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lithography technology and trends for More than Moore devices

• Overview of the lithography technologies

• Lithography requirements for More than Moore devices

• Lithography equipment suppliers in the More than Mooredevices

• Conclusions

Page 5: From Technologies to Market - CEA

5

• There are five main technologies that could be used in the semiconductor area

• Today, patterning is performed by various photolithography solutions such as mask aligners, projection steppers, and scanners• There are two laser patterning types (laser direct imaging and laser ablation that could be alternative solutions

to the lithography technologies currently used)

Patterning technologies

Mask aligner Projection

Stepper

Projection scanner

Laser direct imaging Laser ablation NanoImprint(NIL)

LITHOGRAPHY TECHNOLOGIES - OVERVIEW

Patterning in semiconductor is used in microfabrication to pattern parts of a thin film or the bulk of a substrate. It is used for Via formation, bumping process, RDL…

In production

In production

In production Disruptive technologiesCurrent technologies

Page 6: From Technologies to Market - CEA

6

WHAT IS THE PRICE/COST GAP?

From a technical feature perspective, steppers are very attractive but there is a price penalty to pay

Price ($M)

Resolution (µm)

$1M

$2M

$3M

$4M

Mask AlignerWafer

StepperWafer/Panel

Projection

scanner

Wafer

Laser

ablationWafer/Panel

1 µm 2 µm 3 µm 4 µm

Laser Direct

ImagingWafer/Panel

>5 µm

Page 7: From Technologies to Market - CEA

© 2016

Lithography requirement for More than Moore devices

Page 8: From Technologies to Market - CEA

8

LITHOGRAPHY CONCERNS ARE DIFFERENT IN ADVANCED PACKAGING & MEMS

Differentiation between Front-end and More than Moore device

Needs and challenges in packaging lithography are different from front-end lithography

Resolution

Wafer bow

Larger Depth of

focus

Exposure field size

Sidewall coverage

IR alignmentcapabilities

Overlay

Manufacturing requirements in commonbetween front-end and More than Moore

Throughput& Cost

Overlay

Resolution

New key requirements different from the

Front-end area

Page 9: From Technologies to Market - CEA

9

Stepper

Laser direct imagingPCB board

TECHNICAL GAPS BETWEEN THE WAFER AND PCB INFRASTRUCTURES

Filled by the More than Moore devices infrastructure

• In terms of technical features, a big gap exists between the front-end and back-end/PCB infrastructures

Between the front-end and

PCB areas, a gap exists in terms

of coststructure and

technicalfeatures

2 µm

Line/Space

(L/S)

8 µm 20 µm

FO WLP/WLCSP

Low-cost solution required

5 µm

2.5D interposer

IC substrate

100 µm

Cost

Mask aligner

Front-end technologies

Wafer size (300 mm)

MEMS & Sensors

RF devicesCMOS Image

Sensors

Page 10: From Technologies to Market - CEA

10

MIN RESOLUTION REQUIRED

More than Moore devices

MEMS & Sensors

Min Resolution L/S (µm)

100µm10µm5 µm4 µm3 µm2 µm1 µm

Advanced

Packaging

LED

Inertial MEMS

0.3 µm

MicrophoneOptical MEMS Pressure sensor

HB LEDPSS MicroLED

WLCSP

2.5D interposer eWLP3D TSV ICsFC BGA/FC CSP

RF devices

PowerIGBTMOSFET

SAW

Depends on the frequency range required

0.13 µm

BAW

0.5 µm

InFO WLP

Page 11: From Technologies to Market - CEA

11

LITHOGRAPHY RESOLUTION VS WAFER SIZE

More than Moore devices

Min Resolution L/S (µm)

100µm10µm5 µm4 µm3 µm2 µm1 µm0.3 µm0.13 µm 0.5 µm

Wafer size

(mm)

100

200

300

150

LED

CISPower devices

MEMS & SensorsRF devices

Advanced Packaging

Page 12: From Technologies to Market - CEA

12

GENERAL LITHOGRAPHY REQUIREMENTS

Value required

Key Lithography Requirements

Minimum resolution: 1µm

Overlay accuracy: 0.3µm (layer to layer)

Exposure field size: > 45mm²

IR alignment: < 1µm

Depth of focus: >15µm @ 2µm

Wafer warpage: 5 mm

CD control/sidewall angle: <10%/80°

Lithography

requirements for

Advanced Packaging

Page 13: From Technologies to Market - CEA

13

RESOLUTION TRENDS (L/S = LINE/SPACE) - SEMICONDUCTOR ROADMAP

2016 2017 2018

FO WLP

FC BGA/FC CSP

2.5D interposer/3D IC

8/8 µm 5/5 µm 2/2 µm

30/30 µm, dropping to 12/12 µm 10/10 µm to 8/8 µm

Embedded die

FO WLP panel/organic/glass

panel interposer 25/25 µm 15/15 µm

HDI PCBs

PCB

rigid/flex

Advanced Packaging

Courtesy of

System Plus

30/30 µm 20/20 µm

2019 2020 2021 2022

15/15 µm

40/40 µm 30/30 µm 20/20 µm

WLCSP 10/10 µm 5/5 µm 3/3 µm 2/2 µm

25/25 µm 10/10 µm15/15 µm

2/2 µm 1/1 µm 500/ 500 nm

Page 14: From Technologies to Market - CEA

14| Report | www.yole.fr | ©2017

LITHOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES BY MORE THAN MOORE DEVICE

Advanced Packaging

(all advanced packaging

platforms included)

MEMS devices LED devices Power devices RF devices

Equipment

t suppliers

Mask aligner

Projection

Stepper

Projection

on

scanner

Laser ablation

Not appliedLaser direct imaging

NanoImprint (NIL) Not applied Not applied

Currently used in

Low/Medium Volume

productionUnder Evaluation

Currently used in

HVM production

Page 15: From Technologies to Market - CEA

15

ADVANCED PACKAGING PROJECTION SYSTEMS

Advanced Packaging projection systems breakdown 2017 vs 2023

Projection steppers represent the majority of lithography systems used for Advanced Packaging

In revenue In revenue

Page 16: From Technologies to Market - CEA

16

MEMS PROJECTION SYSTEMS

MEMS & Sensors projection systems breakdown 2017 vs 2023

Mask aligners represent the majority of projection systems used for MEMS devices

Mask aligners are mainly used for non-CMOS processes in MEMS devices

Steppers are used for the CMOS part of MEMS devices or for the most challenging lithography step

In revenue In revenue

Refurbished equipment

Page 17: From Technologies to Market - CEA

© 2016

Lithography equipment suppliers

Page 18: From Technologies to Market - CEA

18| Report | www.yole.fr | ©2017

LITHOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT COMPETING LANDSCAPE

Key Equipment Suppliers

Wide variety of lithography equipment suppliers

GermanyAustria

China

Japan

*

USA

Israel

Netherlands

Page 19: From Technologies to Market - CEA

19

LITHOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS BY DEVICE (NON EXHAUSTIVE LIST)

Advanced Packaging

(all advanced packaging

platforms included)

MEMS devices LED devices Power devices RF devices

Equipment

nt suppliers

suppliers

Mask aligner

Projection

(Stepper &

& full-field)

Laser

ablation

Not appliedLaser direct

direct

imaging

Refurbished equipment

Page 20: From Technologies to Market - CEA

20

LITHOGRAPHY EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY

Price vs Resolution capabilities

Top-tiers vs specializedequipmentvendors

Price ($M)

Resolution (µm)

$1M

$2M

$3M

$4M

1 µm 2 µm 3 µm 4 µm

Laser ablation

Laser Direct Imaging

Page 21: From Technologies to Market - CEA

21

PROJECTION TOOL VENDORS: POSSIBLE RESHAPING OF THE INDUSTRY

There are barriers to entry for both front-end and back-end lithography vendors

Front-End area

(Mainstream)

Back-end/PCB areaMore than Moore applications

Projection

system

equipment

players

Barrier to entry Barrier to entry

DOF

Field

size

Cost of the

tool

Resolution

Overlay

THP

Wafer

warpage

Acquisition

Page 22: From Technologies to Market - CEA

22

EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS’ MARKET SHARES

New Brand Equipment

Lithographyvendors’ marketsharesacrossAdvanced Packagingand MEMS

Advanced Packaging MEMS devices

Veeco/Ultratech

60%

SUSS MicroTec

13%

Canon

12%

SMEE

9%

Others, 6%

SUSS MicroTec

60%

Ushio

18%

EVG

22%

LED devices

SMEE

55%

Veeco/Ultratech

35%

Others, 10%

Page 23: From Technologies to Market - CEA

© 2016

The Last Word …

Page 24: From Technologies to Market - CEA

24

CONCLUSIONS

• More than Moore devices have very complex technical specifications which differ from those associated with the front-end area.

• There is a compromise between cost effectiveness and better performances that is becoming increasingly important in the photolithography business

• Some More than Moore devices have relaxed specifications compared to the packaging area.

• MEMS photolithography market benefits from a high percentage of re-used/retrofitted equipment coming from the mainstream front end semiconductor industry.

• Although mask aligner and steppers are already well established, disruptive technologies such as laser direct imaging (LDI) and laser ablation might emerge and could contribute and gain a small market share in coming years.

Page 25: From Technologies to Market - CEA

25

FOR MORE INFORMATION …

Take a look at our websites

www.yole.fr

and

www.i-micronews.com

Online free registration to YOLE publications

Amandine Pizzagalli

Email: [email protected]